e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
Commission file number 001-15925
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
13-3893191 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
4000 Meridian Boulevard
|
|
37067 |
Franklin, Tennessee
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
(Registrants telephone number)
615-465-7000
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of July 22, 2011, there were outstanding 93,212,756 shares of the Registrants Common
Stock, $0.01 par value.
Community Health Systems, Inc.
Form 10-Q
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
1
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
191,432 |
|
|
$ |
299,169 |
|
Patient accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,793,404 and
$1,639,198 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
1,792,404 |
|
|
|
1,714,542 |
|
Supplies |
|
|
342,268 |
|
|
|
329,114 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,464 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
115,819 |
|
|
|
115,819 |
|
Prepaid expenses and taxes |
|
|
117,458 |
|
|
|
100,754 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
175,109 |
|
|
|
193,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,734,490 |
|
|
|
2,871,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
8,798,266 |
|
|
|
8,383,122 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(2,291,842 |
) |
|
|
(2,058,685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
6,506,424 |
|
|
|
6,324,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,227,970 |
|
|
|
4,150,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
1,356,531 |
|
|
|
1,352,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
14,825,415 |
|
|
$ |
14,698,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
70,112 |
|
|
$ |
63,139 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
583,924 |
|
|
|
526,338 |
|
Current income tax payable |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
8,882 |
|
|
|
8,882 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
145,146 |
|
|
|
146,415 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
854,329 |
|
|
|
897,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,662,742 |
|
|
|
1,642,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
8,781,443 |
|
|
|
8,808,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
608,177 |
|
|
|
608,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,026,069 |
|
|
|
1,001,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
12,078,431 |
|
|
|
12,060,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
376,658 |
|
|
|
387,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value per share, 300,000,000 shares authorized;
93,210,424 shares issued and 92,234,875 shares outstanding at
June 30, 2011, and 93,644,862 shares issued and 92,669,313 shares
outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,119,205 |
|
|
|
1,126,751 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 975,549 shares at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
(6,678 |
) |
|
|
(6,678 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(200,533 |
) |
|
|
(230,927 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,396,095 |
|
|
|
1,299,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
|
2,309,021 |
|
|
|
2,189,464 |
|
Noncontrolling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
61,305 |
|
|
|
60,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
2,370,326 |
|
|
|
2,250,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
14,825,415 |
|
|
$ |
14,698,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net operating revenues |
|
$ |
3,433,829 |
|
|
$ |
3,080,646 |
|
|
$ |
6,787,881 |
|
|
$ |
6,149,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
1,384,096 |
|
|
|
1,231,559 |
|
|
|
2,763,463 |
|
|
|
2,478,240 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
433,002 |
|
|
|
367,002 |
|
|
|
832,971 |
|
|
|
733,503 |
|
Supplies |
|
|
449,279 |
|
|
|
430,574 |
|
|
|
907,096 |
|
|
|
852,686 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
654,737 |
|
|
|
559,962 |
|
|
|
1,269,530 |
|
|
|
1,116,581 |
|
Rent |
|
|
62,431 |
|
|
|
60,851 |
|
|
|
125,601 |
|
|
|
122,908 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
161,376 |
|
|
|
149,779 |
|
|
|
319,531 |
|
|
|
293,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
3,144,921 |
|
|
|
2,799,727 |
|
|
|
6,218,192 |
|
|
|
5,597,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
288,908 |
|
|
|
280,919 |
|
|
|
569,689 |
|
|
|
551,658 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
163,230 |
|
|
|
160,759 |
|
|
|
326,448 |
|
|
|
320,182 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(12,017 |
) |
|
|
(10,980 |
) |
|
|
(30,151 |
) |
|
|
(23,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
137,695 |
|
|
|
131,140 |
|
|
|
273,392 |
|
|
|
255,046 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
44,821 |
|
|
|
42,761 |
|
|
|
88,913 |
|
|
|
82,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
92,874 |
|
|
|
88,379 |
|
|
|
184,479 |
|
|
|
172,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations of entities sold and held for sale |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
(2,037 |
) |
|
|
(1,443 |
) |
|
|
(1,398 |
) |
Impairment of hospitals held for sale |
|
|
(39,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
(39,327 |
) |
|
|
(2,037 |
) |
|
|
(52,607 |
) |
|
|
(1,398 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
53,547 |
|
|
|
86,342 |
|
|
|
131,872 |
|
|
|
171,338 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
18,158 |
|
|
|
16,277 |
|
|
|
35,159 |
|
|
|
31,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. |
|
$ |
35,389 |
|
|
$ |
70,065 |
|
|
$ |
96,713 |
|
|
$ |
140,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to Community
Health Systems, Inc. common stockholders (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
1.64 |
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.43 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.58 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Community
Health Systems, Inc. common stockholders (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.43 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.57 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
91,130,672 |
|
|
|
93,358,771 |
|
|
|
91,069,876 |
|
|
|
92,491,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
91,783,725 |
|
|
|
94,711,919 |
|
|
|
91,960,610 |
|
|
|
93,779,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total per share amounts may not add due to rounding. |
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
131,872 |
|
|
$ |
171,338 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
324,367 |
|
|
|
301,060 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
20,732 |
|
|
|
20,418 |
|
Loss on sale |
|
|
3,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of hospitals held for sale |
|
|
47,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit relating to stock-based compensation |
|
|
(4,659 |
) |
|
|
(10,104 |
) |
Other non-cash expenses, net |
|
|
4,313 |
|
|
|
(2,342 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patient accounts receivable |
|
|
(83,082 |
) |
|
|
(63,896 |
) |
Supplies, prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
9,374 |
|
|
|
(1,147 |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and income taxes |
|
|
129,518 |
|
|
|
114,100 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
12,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
584,685 |
|
|
|
541,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of facilities and other related equipment |
|
|
(204,264 |
) |
|
|
(2,413 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(351,383 |
) |
|
|
(263,924 |
) |
Proceeds from disposition of ancillary operations |
|
|
18,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
8,034 |
|
|
|
2,307 |
|
Increase in other non-operating assets |
|
|
(75,211 |
) |
|
|
(64,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(604,360 |
) |
|
|
(328,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
18,831 |
|
|
|
53,615 |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit relating to stock-based compensation |
|
|
4,659 |
|
|
|
10,104 |
|
Stock buy-back |
|
|
(50,002 |
) |
|
|
(12,242 |
) |
Proceeds from noncontrolling investors in joint ventures |
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
5,155 |
|
Redemption of noncontrolling investments in joint ventures |
|
|
(3,303 |
) |
|
|
(2,395 |
) |
Distributions to noncontrolling investors in joint ventures |
|
|
(30,078 |
) |
|
|
(29,371 |
) |
Repayments of long-term indebtedness |
|
|
(28,798 |
) |
|
|
(34,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(88,062 |
) |
|
|
(9,291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(107,737 |
) |
|
|
204,213 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
299,169 |
|
|
|
344,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
191,432 |
|
|
$ |
548,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payments |
|
$ |
327,717 |
|
|
$ |
320,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (refunds received) paid, net |
|
$ |
(25,697 |
) |
|
$ |
79,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Community Health Systems, Inc.
and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S.
GAAP). In the opinion of management, such information contains all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for such periods.
All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The results of operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2011. Certain information and disclosures
normally included in the notes to consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted
as permitted by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
The Company believes the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended
December 31, 2010, contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Noncontrolling interests in less-than-wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries of the parent are
presented as a component of total equity on the condensed consolidated balance sheets to
distinguish between the interests of the parent company and the interests of the noncontrolling
owners. Noncontrolling interests that are redeemable or may become redeemable at a fixed or
determinable price at the option of the holder or upon the occurrence of an event outside of the
control of the Company are presented in mezzanine equity on the condensed consolidated balance
sheets.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company sold a multi-specialty physician
clinic and made the decision to sell a hospital. In June 2011, the Company entered into a
definitive agreement to sell two of its hospitals in Oklahoma. As of June 30, 2011, the Company
has three hospitals held for sale. The condensed consolidated statement of income for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010 has been restated to reclassify the results of operations for
these entities to discontinued operations. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December
31, 2010 has been restated to present the long-lived assets of the disposal group as held for sale
in other assets, net for comparative purposes with the June 30, 2011 presentation.
Throughout these notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements, Community Health
Systems, Inc. (the Parent), and its consolidated subsidiaries are referred to on a collective
basis as the Company. This drafting style is not meant to indicate that the publicly-traded
Parent or any subsidiary of the Parent owns or operates any asset, business, or property. The
hospitals, operations and businesses described in this filing are owned and operated, and
management services provided, by distinct and indirect subsidiaries of Community Health Systems,
Inc.
2. ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock-based compensation awards are granted under the Community Health Systems, Inc. 2000
Stock Option and Award Plan, amended and restated as of March 24, 2009 (the 2000 Plan), and the
Community Health Systems, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan, amended and restated as of March
18, 2011 (the 2009 Plan).
The 2000 Plan allows for the grant of incentive stock options intended to qualify under
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), as well as stock options which do not so qualify,
stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance-based shares or
units and other share awards. Prior to being amended in 2009, the 2000 Plan also allowed for the
grant of phantom stock. Persons eligible to receive grants under the 2000 Plan include the
Companys directors, officers, employees and consultants. To date, all options granted under the
2000 Plan have been nonqualified stock options for tax purposes. Generally, vesting of these
granted options occurs in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the award
date. Options granted prior to 2005 have a 10-year contractual term, options granted in 2005
through 2007 have an eight-year contractual term and options granted in 2008 or later have a
10-year contractual term. As of June 30, 2011, 127,250 shares of unissued common stock were
reserved for future grants under the 2000 Plan.
5
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
The 2009 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options intended to qualify under
Section 422 of the IRC and for the grant of stock options which do not so qualify, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance-based shares or units
and other share awards. Persons eligible to receive grants under the 2009 Plan include the
Companys directors, officers, employees and consultants. Options granted in 2011 have a 10-year
contractual term. As of June 30, 2011, 2,897,129 shares of unissued common stock were reserved for
future grants under the 2009 Plan.
The exercise price of all options granted is equal to the fair value of the Companys common
stock on the option grant date.
The following table reflects the impact of total compensation expense related to stock-based
equity plans on the reported operating results for the respective periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Effect on income from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
(10,814 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,655 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,732 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,418 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on net income |
|
$ |
(6,867 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,473 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,165 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011, $79.5 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense was expected
to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 26 months. Of that amount, $17.2 million related
to outstanding unvested stock options was expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 26 months and $62.3 million related to outstanding unvested restricted stock, restricted stock
units and phantom shares was expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 26 months.
There were no modifications to awards during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.
The fair value of stock options was estimated using the Black Scholes option pricing model
with the following assumptions and weighted-average fair values during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
38.1 |
% |
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
|
33.6 |
% |
Expected dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected term |
|
4 years |
|
|
3 years |
|
|
4 years |
|
|
3.1 years |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.35 |
% |
|
|
1.20 |
% |
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
1.47 |
% |
In determining expected term, the Company examined concentrations of option holdings and
historical patterns of option exercises and forfeitures, as well as forward-looking factors, in an
effort to determine if there were any discernable employee populations. From this analysis, the
Company identified two primary employee populations, one consisting of certain senior executives
and the other consisting of substantially all other recipients.
The expected volatility rate was estimated based on historical volatility. In determining
expected volatility, the Company also reviewed the market-based implied volatility of actively
traded options of its common stock and determined that historical volatility utilized to estimate
the expected volatility did not differ significantly from the implied volatility.
The expected term computation is based on historical exercise and cancellation patterns and
forward-looking factors, where present, for each population identified. The risk-free interest rate
is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The pre-vesting
forfeiture rate is based on historical rates and forward-looking factors for each population
identified. The Company adjusts the estimated forfeiture rate to its actual experience.
6
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Options outstanding and exercisable under the 2000 Plan and the 2009 Plan as of June 30, 2011,
and changes during each of the three-month periods following December 31, 2010, were as follows (in
thousands, except share and per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted - |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Value as of |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
7,834,332 |
|
|
$ |
32.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
1,329,000 |
|
|
|
37.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(595,431 |
) |
|
|
30.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and cancelled |
|
|
(64,508 |
) |
|
|
34.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
8,503,393 |
|
|
|
33.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
28.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(23,579 |
) |
|
|
29.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and cancelled |
|
|
(50,342 |
) |
|
|
32.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
8,474,472 |
|
|
$ |
33.08 |
|
|
5.8 years |
|
$ |
9,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
5,804,556 |
|
|
$ |
32.78 |
|
|
4.3 years |
|
$ |
7,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the three months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $8.89 and $10.07, respectively, and $10.29 and $8.54 during the
six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value (the number of
in-the-money stock options multiplied by the difference between the Companys closing stock price
on the last trading day of the reporting period ($25.68) and the exercise price of the respective
stock options) in the table above represents the amount that would have been received by the option
holders had all option holders exercised their options on June 30, 2011. This amount changes based
on the market value of the Companys common stock. The aggregate intrinsic value of options
exercised during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $0.2 million and $18.6 million,
respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010 was $6.1 million and $28.2 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value
of options vested and expected to vest approximates that of the outstanding options.
The Company has also awarded restricted stock under the 2000 Plan and the 2009 Plan to its
directors and employees of certain subsidiaries. The restrictions on these shares generally lapse
in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the award date. Certain of the
restricted stock awards granted to the Companys senior executives contain a performance objective
that must be met in addition to any vesting requirements. If the performance objective is not
attained, the awards will be forfeited in their entirety. Once the performance objective has been
attained, restrictions will lapse in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries
of the award date. Notwithstanding the above-mentioned performance objectives and vesting
requirements, the restrictions will lapse earlier in the event of death, disability or termination
of employment by the Company for any reason other than for cause of the holder of the restricted
stock, or change in control of the Company. Restricted stock awards subject to performance
standards are not considered outstanding for purposes of determining earnings per share until the
performance objectives have been satisfied.
7
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Restricted stock outstanding under the 2000 Plan and the 2009 Plan as of June 30, 2011, and
changes during each of the three-month periods following December 31, 2010, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Unvested at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,125,291 |
|
|
$ |
27.92 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,084,949 |
|
|
|
37.96 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(962,662 |
) |
|
|
27.27 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
2,247,578 |
|
|
|
33.04 |
|
Granted |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
28.12 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
33.49 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
2,243,578 |
|
|
|
33.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On February 25, 2009, under the 2000 Plan, each of the Companys outside directors received a
grant of shares of phantom stock equal in value to approximately $130,000 divided by the closing
price of the Companys common stock on that date ($18.18), or 7,151 shares per director (a total of
42,906 shares of phantom stock). Pursuant to a March 24, 2009 amendment to the 2000 Plan, all
subsequent grants of this type are denominated as restricted stock unit awards. On May 19, 2009,
the newly elected outside director received a grant of 7,151 restricted stock units under the 2000
Plan, having a value at the time of $180,706 based upon the closing price of the Companys common
stock on that date of $25.27. On February 24, 2010, six of the Companys seven outside directors
each received a grant of 4,130 restricted stock units under the 2000 Plan, having a value at the
time of approximately $140,000 based upon the closing price of the Companys common stock on that
date of $33.90. One outside director, who did not stand for reelection in 2010, did not receive
such a grant. On February 23, 2011, each of the Companys six outside directors received a grant
of 3,688 restricted stock units under the 2009 Plan, having a value at the time of approximately
$140,000 based upon the closing price of the Companys common stock on that date of $37.96. Vesting
of these shares of phantom stock and restricted stock units occurs in one-third increments on each
of the first three anniversaries of the award date. During the three months ended June 30, 2011,
2,384 shares vested at a weighted-average grant date fair value of $25.27. During the six months
ended June 30, 2011, 22,560 shares vested at a weighted-average grant date fair value of $24.68.
None of these grants were canceled during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. As of June
30, 2011, there were 52,956 shares of phantom stock and restricted stock units unvested at a
weighted-average grant date fair value of $31.67.
Under the Directors Fees Deferral Plan, the Companys outside directors may elect to receive
share equivalent units in lieu of cash for their directors fees. These share equivalent units are
held in the plan until the director electing to receive the share equivalent units retires or
otherwise terminates his/her directorship with the Company. Share equivalent units are converted to
shares of common stock of the Company at the time of distribution based on the closing market price
of the Companys common stock on that date. The following table represents the amount of directors
fees which were deferred during each of the respective periods, and the number of share equivalent
units into which such directors fees would have converted had each of the directors who had
deferred such fees retired or terminated his/her directorship with the Company as of the end of the
respective periods (in thousands, except share equivalent units):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Directors fees earned and deferred into plan |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share equivalent units |
|
|
2,142 |
|
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
|
3,517 |
|
|
|
2,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011, a total of 22,318 share equivalent units were deferred in the plan with an
aggregate fair value of $0.6 million, based on the closing market price of the Companys common
stock at June 30, 2011 of $25.68.
8
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
3. COST OF REVENUE
Substantially all of the Companys operating costs and expenses are cost of revenue items.
Operating costs that could be classified as general and administrative by the Company would include
the Companys corporate office costs at its Franklin, Tennessee office, which were $47.8 million
and $42.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $89.5
million and $80.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Included
in these amounts is stock-based compensation expense of $10.8 million and $10.7 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $20.7 million and $20.4 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
4. USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated
financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions
or conditions.
5. ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES
Acquisitions
The Company accounts for all transactions that represent business combinations after January
1, 2009 using the acquisition method of accounting, where the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquired entity are recognized and
measured at their fair values on the date the Company obtains control in the acquiree. Such fair
values that are not finalized for reporting periods following the acquisition date are estimated
and recorded as provisional amounts. Adjustments to these provisional amounts during the
measurement period (defined as the date through which all information required to identify and
measure the consideration transferred, the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interests has been obtained, limited to one year from the acquisition date) are
recorded as of the date of acquisition. Any material impact to comparative information for periods
after acquisition, but before the period in which adjustments are identified, is reflected in those
prior periods as if the adjustments were considered as of the acquisition date. Goodwill is
determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration conveyed in the acquisition over
the fair value of the net assets acquired.
Effective May 1, 2011, one or more subsidiaries of the Company completed the acquisition of
Mercy Health Partners based in Scranton, Pennsylvania, a healthcare system of two acute care
hospitals, a long-term acute care facility and other healthcare providers. This healthcare system
includes Regional Hospital of Scranton (198 licensed beds) located in Scranton, Pennsylvania, and
Tyler Memorial Hospital (48 licensed beds) located in Tunkhannock, Pennsylvania. This healthcare
system also includes a long-term acute care facility, Special Care Hospital (67 licensed beds)
located in Nanticoke, Pennsylvania, as well as several outpatient clinics and other ancillary
facilities. The total cash consideration paid for fixed assets was approximately $150.5 million,
with additional consideration of $12.3 million assumed in liabilities as well as a credit applied
at closing of $2.1 million for negative acquired working capital, for a total consideration of
$160.7 million. Based upon the Companys preliminary purchase price allocation relating to this
acquisition as of June 30, 2011, approximately $42.1 million of goodwill has been recorded. The
preliminary allocation of the purchase price has been determined by the Company based on available
information and is subject to settling amounts related to purchased working capital and final
appraisals of tangible and intangible assets. Adjustments to the purchase price allocation are not
expected to be material.
Effective October 1, 2010, one or more subsidiaries of the Company completed the acquisition
of Forum Health based in Youngstown, Ohio, a healthcare system of two acute care hospitals, a
rehabilitation hospital and other healthcare providers. This healthcare system includes Northside
Medical Center (355 licensed beds) located in Youngstown, Ohio, and Trumbull Memorial Hospital (311
licensed beds) located in Warren, Ohio. This healthcare system also includes Hillside
Rehabilitation Hospital (69 licensed beds) located in Warren, Ohio, as well as several outpatient
clinics and other ancillary facilities. The total cash consideration paid for fixed assets and
working capital was approximately $93.4 million and $27.8 million, respectively, with additional
consideration of $40.3 million assumed in liabilities, for a total consideration of $161.5 million.
Based upon the Companys final purchase price allocation relating to this acquisition as of June
30, 2011, approximately $8.1 million of goodwill has been recorded.
9
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Effective October 1, 2010, one or more subsidiaries of the Company completed the acquisition
of Bluefield Regional Medical Center (240 licensed beds) located in Bluefield, West Virginia. The
total cash consideration paid for fixed assets was approximately $35.4 million, with additional
consideration of $8.9 million assumed in liabilities as well as a credit applied at closing of $1.8
million for negative acquired working capital, for a total consideration of $42.5 million. Based
upon the Companys final purchase price allocation relating to this acquisition as of June 30,
2011, approximately $2.4 million of goodwill has been recorded.
Effective July 7, 2010, one or more subsidiaries of the Company completed the acquisition of
Marion Regional Healthcare System located in Marion, South Carolina. This healthcare system
includes Marion Regional Hospital (124 licensed beds), an acute care hospital, along with a related
skilled nursing facility and other ancillary services. The total cash consideration paid for fixed
assets and working capital was approximately $18.6 million and $5.8 million, respectively, with
additional consideration of $3.9 million assumed in liabilities, for a total consideration of $28.3
million. Based upon the Companys final purchase price allocation relating to this acquisition as
of June 30, 2011, no goodwill has been recorded.
Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company paid approximately $55.1
million to acquire the operating assets and related businesses of certain physician practices,
clinics and other ancillary businesses that operate within the communities served by its hospitals.
In connection with these acquisitions, the Company allocated approximately $14.7 million of the
consideration paid to property and equipment, $3.4 million to net working capital, $1.5 million to
other intangible assets, and the remainder, approximately $35.5 million consisting of intangible
assets that do not qualify for separate recognition, was allocated to goodwill.
Approximately $5.3 million and $1.2 million of acquisition costs related to prospective and
closed acquisitions were expensed during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, and $8.7 million and $1.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
Discontinued Operations
Effective February 1, 2011, the Company sold Willamette Community Medical Group, which is a
physician clinic operating as Oregon Medical Group (OMG), located in Springfield, Oregon, with a
carrying amount of net assets, including an allocation of reporting unit goodwill, of $19.7 million
to Oregon Healthcare Resources, LLC, for $14.6 million in cash.
In March 2011, the Company made the decision to sell one of its hospitals. In June 2011, the
Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell two of its hospitals. Accordingly, these three
hospitals are classified as held for sale at June 30, 2011.
The Company has classified the results of operations for OMG and the three hospitals held for
sale as discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Net operating revenues and loss from discontinued operations for the respective periods are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net operating revenues |
|
$ |
68,479 |
|
|
$ |
90,378 |
|
|
$ |
140,563 |
|
|
$ |
182,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations of entities sold
and held for sale before income taxes |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
(3,232 |
) |
|
|
(2,280 |
) |
|
|
(1,994 |
) |
Impairment of hospitals held for sale |
|
|
(38,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, before taxes |
|
|
(38,208 |
) |
|
|
(3,232 |
) |
|
|
(59,036 |
) |
|
|
(1,994 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
(1,195 |
) |
|
|
(6,429 |
) |
|
|
(596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
$ |
(39,327 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,037 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,607 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,398 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense was allocated to discontinued operations based on sale proceeds available for
debt repayment.
10
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
The long-lived assets and allocated goodwill as of December 31, 2010 of the physician clinic
sold during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and the three hospitals classified as held for sale at
June 30, 2011 totaled approximately $182.7 million, and are included in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet in other assets, net.
The long-lived assets and allocated goodwill as of June 30, 2011 of the three hospitals held
for sale, net of impairment, totaled approximately $122.6 million and are included in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet in other assets, net.
6. INCOME TAXES
The total amount of unrecognized benefit that would affect the effective tax rate, if
recognized, was approximately $7.7 million as of June 30, 2011. It is the Companys policy to
recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized benefits in its condensed consolidated
statements of income as income tax expense. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company
increased liabilities by $0.1 million and increased interest and penalties by approximately $0.2
million. A total of approximately $1.5 million of interest and penalties is included in the amount
of the liability for uncertain tax positions at June 30, 2011.
The Company believes that it is reasonably possible that approximately $2.3 million of its
current unrecognized tax benefit may be recognized within the next 12 months as a result of a lapse
of the statute of limitations and settlements with taxing authorities.
The Company, or one of its subsidiaries, files income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. The Company has extended the federal statute of
limitations for Triad Hospitals, Inc. (Triad) for the tax periods ended December 31, 1999,
December 31, 2000, April 30, 2001, June 30, 2001, December 31, 2001, December 31, 2002 and December
31, 2003. The Company is currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
regarding the federal tax return of Triad for the tax periods ended December 31, 2004, December 31,
2005, December 31, 2006 and July 25, 2007. The Company believes the results of this examination
will not be material to its consolidated results of operations or consolidated financial position.
With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to state income tax examinations for years
prior to 2007 and federal income tax examinations with respect to Community Health Systems, Inc.
federal returns for years prior to 2007. The Companys federal income tax returns for the 2007 and
2008 tax years are currently under examination by the IRS. The Company believes the results of
this examination will not be material to its consolidated results of operations or consolidated
financial position.
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds received, resulted in a net cash refund of $25.0
million and net cash paid of $78.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30,
2010, respectively. Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds received, resulted in a net cash
refund of $25.7 million and net cash paid of $79.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011
and June 30, 2010, respectively.
7. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2011, are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010 (as previously reported) |
|
$ |
4,199,905 |
|
Goodwill allocated to disposal and hospitals held for sale |
|
|
(49,658 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010 (as adjusted) |
|
|
4,150,247 |
|
Goodwill acquired as part of acquisitions during 2011 |
|
|
77,760 |
|
Consideration adjustments and purchase price
allocation adjustments for prior years acquisitions |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
4,227,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit, which is defined as an operating
segment or one level below the operating segment (referred to as a component of the entity).
Management has determined that the Companys operating segments meet the criteria to be classified
as reporting units. At June 30, 2011, the hospital operations reporting unit, the home care agency
operations reporting unit, and the hospital management services reporting unit had approximately
$4.2 billion, $35.9 million and $33.3 million, respectively, of goodwill.
11
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment at the same time every year and when an event occurs or
circumstances change that, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below
its carrying value. There is a two-step method for determining goodwill impairment. Step one is to
compare the fair value of the reporting unit with the units carrying amount, including goodwill.
If this test indicates the fair value is less than the carrying value, then step two is required to
compare the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill with the carrying value of the
reporting units goodwill. The Company has selected September 30 as its annual testing date. The
Company performed its last annual goodwill evaluation as of September 30, 2010, which evaluation
took place during the fourth quarter of 2010. No impairment was indicated by this evaluation.
The Company estimates the fair value of the related reporting units using both a discounted
cash flow model as well as an EBITDA multiple model. The cash flow forecasts are adjusted by an
appropriate discount rate based on the Companys estimate of a market participants
weighted-average cost of capital. These models are both based on the Companys best estimate of
future revenues and operating costs and are reconciled to the Companys consolidated market
capitalization, with consideration of the amount a potential acquirer would be required to pay, in
the form of a control premium, in order to gain sufficient ownership to set policies, direct
operations and control management decisions.
The gross carrying amount of the Companys other intangible assets subject to amortization was
$61.7 million at June 30, 2011 and $60.5 million at December 31, 2010, and the net carrying amount
was $34.1 million at June 30, 2011 and $36.1 million at December 31, 2010. The carrying amount of
the Companys other intangible assets not subject to amortization was $44.1 million and $44.4
million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Other intangible assets are included
in other assets, net on the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheets. Substantially all of
the Companys intangible assets are contract-based intangible assets related to operating licenses,
management contracts, or non-compete agreements entered into in connection with prior acquisitions.
The weighted-average amortization period for the intangible assets subject to amortization is
approximately nine years. There are no expected residual values related to these intangible assets.
Amortization expense on these intangible assets was $2.3 million and $3.1 million during the three
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $4.2 million and $6.3 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Amortization expense on intangible assets is
estimated to be $3.9 million for the remainder of 2011, $7.1 million in 2012, $4.5 million in 2013,
$2.9 million in 2014, $2.5 million in 2015 and $13.2 million in 2016 and thereafter.
The gross carrying amount of capitalized software for internal use was approximately $396.9
million and $356.5 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and the net
carrying amount considering accumulated amortization was approximately $219.1 million and $209.4
million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The estimated amortization period for
capitalized internal-use software is generally three years, except for capitalized costs related to
significant system conversions, which is generally eight years. There is no expected residual
value for capitalized internal-use software. At June 30, 2011, there was approximately $76.6
million of capitalized costs for internal-use software that is currently in the development stage
and will begin amortization once the software project is complete and ready for its intended use.
Amortization expense on capitalized internal-use software was $16.7 million and $11.0 million
during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $34.7 million and $20.2
million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Amortization expense on
capitalized internal-use software is estimated to be $37.5 million for the remainder of 2011, $75.1
million in 2012, $45.1 million in 2013, $18.1 million in 2014, $15.7 million in 2015 and $27.6
million in 2016 and thereafter.
12
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
8. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the components of the numerator and denominator for the
computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for income from continuing operations,
discontinued operations and net income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. common
stockholders (in thousands, except share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of taxes |
|
$ |
92,874 |
|
|
$ |
88,379 |
|
|
$ |
184,479 |
|
|
$ |
172,736 |
|
Less: Income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling
interests, net of taxes |
|
|
18,158 |
|
|
|
16,313 |
|
|
|
35,159 |
|
|
|
31,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to Community Health
Systems, Inc. common stockholders basic and diluted |
|
$ |
74,716 |
|
|
$ |
72,066 |
|
|
$ |
149,320 |
|
|
$ |
141,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
$ |
(39,327 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,037 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,607 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,398 |
) |
Less: Loss from discontinued operations attributable to
noncontrolling interests, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to Community
Health Systems, Inc. common stockholders basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(39,327 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,001 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,607 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,332 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding basic |
|
|
91,130,672 |
|
|
|
93,358,771 |
|
|
|
91,069,876 |
|
|
|
92,491,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
|
263,876 |
|
|
|
522,496 |
|
|
|
258,871 |
|
|
|
423,442 |
|
Employee stock options |
|
|
381,632 |
|
|
|
815,455 |
|
|
|
623,662 |
|
|
|
847,380 |
|
Other equity-based awards |
|
|
7,545 |
|
|
|
15,197 |
|
|
|
8,201 |
|
|
|
16,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
91,783,725 |
|
|
|
94,711,919 |
|
|
|
91,960,610 |
|
|
|
93,779,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive securities outstanding not included in the computation of earnings
per share because their effect is antidilutive: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options |
|
|
6,726,417 |
|
|
|
3,503,906 |
|
|
|
5,560,855 |
|
|
|
4,432,069 |
|
13
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
9. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Authorized capital shares of the Company include 400,000,000 shares of capital stock
consisting of 300,000,000 shares of common stock and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Each of
the aforementioned classes of capital stock has a par value of $0.01 per share. Shares of preferred
stock, none of which were outstanding as of June 30, 2011, may be issued in one or more series
having such rights, preferences and other provisions as determined by the Board of Directors
without approval by the holders of common stock.
On September 15, 2010, the Company commenced a new open market repurchase program for up to
4,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock, not to exceed $100 million in repurchases. This
program will conclude at the earliest of three years from the commencement date, when the maximum
number of shares has been repurchased or when the maximum dollar amount has been expended. During
the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company repurchased and retired 1,763,566 shares
at a weighted-average price of $28.31 under this program. The cumulative number of shares that
have been repurchased and retired under this program through June 30, 2011 is 2,214,838 shares at a
weighted-average price of $28.82 per share.
On December 9, 2009, the Company commenced the predecessor open market repurchase program for
up to 3,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock, not to exceed $100 million in repurchases.
This program concluded in September 2010 when purchases approximated the total permitted maximum
dollar amount allowed under the program. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the
Company repurchased and retired 356,000 shares at a weighted-average price of $34.24 under this
program. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company repurchased and retired 2,964,528
shares, which is the cumulative number of shares that were repurchased under this program, at a
weighted-average price of $33.69 per share.
14
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
The following schedule presents the reconciliation of the carrying amount of total equity,
equity attributable to the Company, and equity attributable to the noncontrolling interests for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Health Systems, Inc. Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Interests |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Interests |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
387,472 |
|
|
|
$ |
936 |
|
|
$ |
1,126,751 |
|
|
$ |
(6,678 |
) |
|
$ |
(230,927 |
) |
|
$ |
1,299,382 |
|
|
$ |
60,913 |
|
|
$ |
2,250,377 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
25,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,713 |
|
|
|
9,948 |
|
|
|
106,661 |
|
Net change in fair value of
interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,477 |
|
Net change in fair value of
available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
Amortization and recognition
of unrecognized pension
cost components |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
25,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,394 |
|
|
|
96,713 |
|
|
|
9,948 |
|
|
|
137,055 |
|
Distributions to
noncontrolling interests,
net of contributions |
|
|
(19,387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,828 |
) |
|
|
(9,828 |
) |
Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(2,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(498 |
) |
Other reclassifications of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(2,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
Adjustment to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(11,842 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,842 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(50,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,020 |
) |
Issuance of common stock in connection with the exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
18,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,837 |
|
Cancellation of restricted stock for tax withholdings on vested shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(13,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,113 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,659 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
20,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
376,658 |
|
|
|
$ |
932 |
|
|
$ |
1,119,205 |
|
|
$ |
(6,678 |
) |
|
$ |
(200,533 |
) |
|
$ |
1,396,095 |
|
|
$ |
61,305 |
|
|
$ |
2,370,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following schedule discloses the effects of changes in the Companys ownership interest in
its less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries on Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders equity (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Net income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. |
|
$ |
96,713 |
|
Transfers to the noncontrolling interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in Community Health Systems, Inc. paid-in capital
for purchase of subsidiary partnership interests |
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transfers to the noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change to Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders equity
from net income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc.
and transfers to noncontrolling interests |
|
$ |
96,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
15
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
10. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The following table presents the components of comprehensive income, net of related taxes (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
53,547 |
|
|
$ |
86,342 |
|
|
$ |
131,872 |
|
|
$ |
171,338 |
|
Net change in fair value of interest rate swaps |
|
|
(8,969 |
) |
|
|
(33,694 |
) |
|
|
27,477 |
|
|
|
(45,051 |
) |
Net change in fair value of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
Amortization and recognition of unrecognized pension cost components |
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
5,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
45,653 |
|
|
|
53,882 |
|
|
|
162,266 |
|
|
|
132,150 |
|
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
18,158 |
|
|
|
16,277 |
|
|
|
35,159 |
|
|
|
31,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. |
|
$ |
27,495 |
|
|
$ |
37,605 |
|
|
$ |
127,107 |
|
|
$ |
100,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net change in fair value of the interest rate swaps, the net change in fair value of
available-for-sale securities and the amortization and recognition of unrecognized pension cost
components are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets.
11. EQUITY INVESTMENTS
As of June 30, 2011, the Company owned equity interests of 27.5% in four hospitals in Las
Vegas, Nevada, and 26.1% in one hospital in Las Vegas, Nevada, in which Universal Health Systems,
Inc. owns the majority interest, and an equity interest of 38.0% in three hospitals in Macon,
Georgia, in which HCA Inc. owns the majority interest.
Summarized combined financial information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, for these unconsolidated entities in which the Company owns an equity interest is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Revenues |
|
$ |
373,448 |
|
|
$ |
358,586 |
|
|
$ |
746,039 |
|
|
$ |
716,065 |
|
Operating costs and expenses |
|
|
334,765 |
|
|
|
321,457 |
|
|
|
652,752 |
|
|
|
645,977 |
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes |
|
|
38,652 |
|
|
|
37,113 |
|
|
|
93,236 |
|
|
|
70,045 |
|
The summarized financial information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
was derived from the unaudited financial information provided to the Company by those
unconsolidated entities.
The Companys investment in all of its unconsolidated affiliates was $421.0 million and $409.5
million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and is included in other assets, net
in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Included in the Companys results of
operations is the Companys equity in pre-tax earnings from all of its investments in
unconsolidated affiliates, which was $12.0 million and $11.0 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $30.2 million and $23.6 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
16
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
12. LONG-TERM DEBT
Credit Facility and Notes
In connection with the consummation of the acquisition of Triad in July 2007, the Companys
wholly-owned subsidiary CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. (CHS) obtained approximately $7.2
billion of senior secured financing under a new credit facility (the Credit Facility) with a
syndicate of financial institutions led by Credit Suisse, as administrative agent and collateral
agent, and issued approximately $3.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 8.875% senior notes due
2015 (the Notes). The Company used the net proceeds of $3.0 billion from the Notes offering and
the net proceeds of approximately $6.1 billion of term loans under the Credit Facility to acquire
the outstanding shares of Triad, to refinance certain of Triads indebtedness and the Companys
indebtedness, to complete certain related transactions, to pay certain costs and expenses of the
transactions and for general corporate uses. Specifically, the Company repaid its outstanding debt
under the previously outstanding credit facility, the 6.50% senior subordinated notes due 2012 and
certain of Triads existing indebtedness.
The Credit Facility consisted of an approximately $6.1 billion funded term loan facility with
a maturity of seven years, a $400 million delayed draw term loan facility with a maturity of seven
years and a $750 million revolving credit facility with a maturity of six years. As of December 31,
2007, the $400 million delayed draw term loan facility had been reduced to $300 million at the
request of CHS. During the fourth quarter of 2008, $100 million of the delayed draw term loan was
drawn by CHS, reducing the delayed draw term loan availability to $200 million at December 31,
2008. In January 2009, CHS drew down the remaining $200 million of the delayed draw term loan. The
revolving credit facility also includes a subfacility for letters of credit and a swingline
subfacility. The Credit Facility requires quarterly amortization payments of each term loan
facility equal to 0.25% of the outstanding amount of the term loans. On November 5, 2010, CHS
entered into an amendment and restatement of its existing Credit Facility. The amendment extends
by two and a half years, until January 25, 2017, the maturity date of $1.5 billion of the existing
term loans under the Credit Facility and increases the pricing on these term loans to LIBOR plus
350 basis points. If more than $50 million of the Notes remain outstanding on April 15, 2015,
without having been refinanced, then the maturity date for the extended term loans will be
accelerated to April 15, 2015. The maturity date of the balance of the term loans of approximately
$4.5 billion remains unchanged at July 25, 2014. The amendment also increases CHSs ability to
issue additional indebtedness under the uncommitted incremental facility to $1.0 billion from $600
million, permits CHS to issue Term A term loans under the incremental facility, and provides up to
$2.0 billion of borrowing capacity from receivable transactions, an increase of $0.5 billion, of
which $1.7 billion would be required to be used for repayment of existing term loans.
The term loan facility must be prepaid in an amount equal to (1) 100% of the net cash proceeds
of certain asset sales and dispositions by the Company and its subsidiaries, subject to certain
exceptions and reinvestment rights, (2) 100% of the net cash proceeds of issuances of certain debt
obligations or receivables based financing by the Company and its subsidiaries, subject to certain
exceptions, and (3) 50%, subject to reduction to a lower percentage based on the Companys leverage
ratio (as defined in the Credit Facility generally as the ratio of total debt on the date of
determination to the Companys EBITDA, as defined, for the four quarters most recently ended prior
to such date), of excess cash flow (as defined) for any year, commencing in 2008, subject to
certain exceptions. Voluntary prepayments and commitment reductions are permitted in whole or in
part, without any premium or penalty, subject to minimum prepayment or reduction requirements.
The obligor under the Credit Facility is CHS. All of the obligations under the Credit Facility
are unconditionally guaranteed by the Company and certain existing and subsequently acquired or
organized domestic subsidiaries. All obligations under the Credit Facility and the related
guarantees are secured by a perfected first priority lien or security interest in substantially all
of the assets of the Company, CHS and each subsidiary guarantor, including equity interests held by
the Company, CHS or any subsidiary guarantor, but excluding, among others, the equity interests of
non-significant subsidiaries, syndication subsidiaries, securitization subsidiaries and joint
venture subsidiaries.
17
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
The loans under the Credit Facility bear interest on the outstanding unpaid principal amount
at a rate equal to an applicable percentage plus, at CHSs option, either (a) an Alternate Base
Rate (as defined) determined by reference to the greater of (1) the Prime Rate (as defined)
announced by Credit Suisse or (2) the Federal Funds Effective Rate (as defined) plus one-half of
1.0% or (3) the adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) on such day for a three-month
interest period commencing on the second business day after such day plus 1%, or (b) a reserve
adjusted LIBOR for dollars (Eurodollar rate) (as defined). The applicable percentage for Alternate
Base Rate loans is 1.25% for term loans due 2014 and is 2.25% for term loans due 2017. The
applicable percentage for Eurodollar rate loans is 2.25% for term loans due 2014 and 3.5% for term
loans due 2017. The applicable percentage for revolving loans is 1.25% for Alternate Base Rate
revolving loans and 2.25% for Eurodollar revolving loans, in each case subject to reduction based
on the Companys leverage ratio. Loans under the swingline subfacility bear interest at the rate
applicable to Alternate Base Rate loans under the revolving credit facility.
CHS has agreed to pay letter of credit fees equal to the applicable percentage then in effect
with respect to Eurodollar rate loans under the revolving credit facility times the maximum
aggregate amount available to be drawn under all letters of credit outstanding under the
subfacility for letters of credit. The issuer of any letter of credit issued under the subfacility
for letters of credit will also receive a customary fronting fee and other customary processing
charges. CHS was initially obligated to pay commitment fees of 0.50% per annum (subject to
reduction based upon the Companys leverage ratio) on the unused portion of the revolving credit
facility. For purposes of this calculation, swingline loans are not treated as usage of the
revolving credit facility. With respect to the delayed draw term loan facility, CHS was also
obligated to pay commitment fees of 0.50% per annum for the first nine months after the closing of
the Credit Facility, 0.75% per annum for the next three months after such nine-month period and
thereafter, 1.0% per annum. In each case, the commitment fee was paid on the unused amount of the
delayed draw term loan facility. After the draw down of the remaining $200 million of the delayed
draw term loan in January 2009, CHS no longer pays any commitment fees for the delayed draw term
loan facility. CHS paid arrangement fees on the closing of the Credit Facility and pays an annual
administrative agent fee.
The Credit Facility contains customary representations and warranties, subject to limitations
and exceptions, and customary covenants restricting the Companys and its subsidiaries ability,
subject to certain exceptions, to, among other things (1) declare dividends, make distributions or
redeem or repurchase capital stock, (2) prepay, redeem or repurchase other debt, (3) incur liens or
grant negative pledges, (4) make loans and investments and enter into acquisitions and joint
ventures, (5) incur additional indebtedness or provide certain guarantees, (6) make capital
expenditures, (7) engage in mergers, acquisitions and asset sales, (8) conduct transactions with
affiliates, (9) alter the nature of the Companys businesses, (10) grant certain guarantees with
respect to physician practices, (11) engage in sale and leaseback transactions or (12) change the
Companys fiscal year. The Company is also required to comply with specified financial covenants
(consisting of a leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio) and various affirmative covenants.
Events of default under the Credit Facility include, but are not limited to, (1) CHSs failure
to pay principal, interest, fees or other amounts under the credit agreement when due (taking into
account any applicable grace period), (2) any representation or warranty proving to have been
materially incorrect when made, (3) covenant defaults subject, with respect to certain covenants,
to a grace period, (4) bankruptcy events, (5) a cross default to certain other debt, (6) certain
undischarged judgments (not paid within an applicable grace period), (7) a change of control, (8)
certain ERISA-related defaults and (9) the invalidity or impairment of specified security
interests, guarantees or subordination provisions in favor of the administrative agent or lenders
under the Credit Facility.
The Notes were issued by CHS in connection with the Triad acquisition in the principal amount
of approximately $3.0 billion. The Notes will mature on July 15, 2015. The Notes bear interest at
the rate of 8.875% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on January 15 and July 15, commencing
January 15, 2008. Interest on the Notes accrues from the date of original issuance. Interest is
calculated on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months.
18
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Except as set forth below, CHS is not entitled to redeem the Notes prior to July 15, 2011.
On and after July 15, 2011, CHS is entitled, at its option, to redeem all or a portion of the
Notes upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days notice, at the redemption prices (expressed as a
percentage of principal amount on the redemption date), plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any,
to the redemption date (subject to the right of holders of record on the relevant record date to
receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date), if redeemed during the 12-month period
commencing on July 15 of the years set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
Redemption Price |
2011 |
|
|
104.438 |
% |
2012 |
|
|
102.219 |
% |
2013 and thereafter |
|
|
100.000 |
% |
CHS is entitled, at its option, to redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to
July 15, 2011, upon not less than 30 or more than 60 days notice, at a redemption price equal to
100% of the principal amount of Notes redeemed plus the Applicable Premium (as defined), and
accrued and unpaid interest, if any, as of the applicable redemption date.
Pursuant to a registration rights agreement entered into at the time of the issuance of the
Notes, as a result of an exchange offer made by CHS, substantially all of the Notes issued in July
2007 were exchanged in November 2007 for new notes (the Exchange Notes) having terms
substantially identical in all material respects to the Notes (except that the Exchange Notes were
issued under a registration statement pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended).
References to the Notes shall also be deemed to include the Exchange Notes unless the context
provides otherwise.
As of June 30, 2011, the availability for additional borrowings under the Credit Facility was
$750 million pursuant to the revolving credit facility, of which $37.9 million was set aside for
outstanding letters of credit. CHS has the ability to amend the Credit Facility to provide for one
or more tranches of term loans in an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion, which CHS has not
yet accessed. CHS also has the ability to add up to $300 million of borrowing capacity from
receivable transactions (including securitizations) under the Credit Facility, which has not yet
been accessed. As of June 30, 2011, the weighted-average interest rate under the Credit Facility,
excluding swaps, was 3.2%.
The Company paid interest of $101.6 million and $99.9 million on borrowings during the three
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $327.7 million and $320.2 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
13. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The fair value of financial instruments has been estimated by the Company using available
market information as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and valuation methodologies
considered appropriate. The estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of amounts the
Company could realize in a current market exchange (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
191,432 |
|
|
$ |
191,432 |
|
|
$ |
299,169 |
|
|
$ |
299,169 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
33,097 |
|
|
|
33,097 |
|
|
|
31,570 |
|
|
|
31,570 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
38,709 |
|
|
|
38,709 |
|
|
|
35,092 |
|
|
|
35,092 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Facility |
|
|
5,974,321 |
|
|
|
5,806,274 |
|
|
|
5,999,337 |
|
|
|
5,882,124 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
2,784,331 |
|
|
|
2,846,978 |
|
|
|
2,784,331 |
|
|
|
2,923,548 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
43,478 |
|
|
|
43,478 |
|
|
|
36,122 |
|
|
|
36,122 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents. The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term
maturity of these instruments (less than three months).
Available-for-sale securities. Estimated fair value is based on closing price as quoted in
public markets.
19
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Trading securities. Estimated fair value is based on closing price as quoted in public
markets.
Credit Facility. Estimated fair value is based on information from the Companys bankers
regarding relevant pricing for trading activity among the Companys lending institutions.
Senior notes. Estimated fair value is based on the average bid and ask price as quoted by the
bank who served as underwriter in the sale of these notes.
Other debt. The carrying amount of all other debt approximates fair value due to the nature
of these obligations.
Interest rate swaps. The fair value of interest rate swap agreements is the amount at which
they could be settled, based on estimates calculated by the Company using a discounted cash flow
analysis based on observable market inputs and validated by comparison to estimates obtained from
the counterparty. The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments (CVAs) to appropriately
reflect both its own nonperformance or credit risk and the respective counterpartys nonperformance
or credit risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its interest rate
swap agreements for the effect of nonperformance or credit risk, the Company has considered the
impact of any netting features included in the agreements.
The Company assesses the effectiveness of its hedge instruments on a quarterly basis. For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company completed an assessment of the cash
flow hedge instruments and determined the hedges to be highly effective. The Company has also
determined that the ineffective portion of the hedges do not have a material effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position, operations or cash flows. The counterparties to the
interest rate swap agreements expose the Company to credit risk in the event of nonperformance.
However, at June 30, 2011, each swap agreement entered into by the Company was in a net liability
position so that the Company would be required to make the net settlement payments to the
counterparties; the Company does not anticipate nonperformance by those counterparties. The Company
does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
20
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Interest rate swaps consisted of the following at June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Fixed Interest |
|
Termination |
|
Fair Value |
Swap # |
|
(in 000s) |
|
Rate |
|
Date |
|
(in 000s) |
1 |
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
|
5.1140 |
% |
|
August 8, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,533 |
|
2 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
4.7185 |
% |
|
August 19, 2011 |
|
|
605 |
|
3 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
4.7040 |
% |
|
August 19, 2011 |
|
|
603 |
|
4 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
4.6250 |
% |
|
August 19, 2011 |
|
|
592 |
|
5 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
4.9300 |
% |
|
August 30, 2011 |
|
|
1,551 |
|
6 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
3.0920 |
% |
|
September 18, 2011 |
|
|
1,248 |
|
7 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.0230 |
% |
|
October 23, 2011 |
|
|
869 |
|
8 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
4.4815 |
% |
|
October 26, 2011 |
|
|
2,712 |
|
9 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
4.0840 |
% |
|
December 3, 2011 |
|
|
3,279 |
|
10 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.8470 |
% |
|
January 4, 2012 |
|
|
1,822 |
|
11 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.8510 |
% |
|
January 4, 2012 |
|
|
1,824 |
|
12 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.8560 |
% |
|
January 4, 2012 |
|
|
1,826 |
|
13 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
3.7260 |
% |
|
January 8, 2012 |
|
|
3,610 |
|
14 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
3.5065 |
% |
|
January 16, 2012 |
|
|
3,514 |
|
15 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
5.0185 |
% |
|
May 30, 2012 |
|
|
10,654 |
|
16 |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
5.0250 |
% |
|
May 30, 2012 |
|
|
6,401 |
|
17 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
4.6845 |
% |
|
September 11, 2012 |
|
|
10,208 |
|
18 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.3520 |
% |
|
October 23, 2012 |
|
|
3,798 |
|
19 |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
4.3745 |
% |
|
November 23, 2012 |
|
|
6,794 |
|
20 |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
4.3800 |
% |
|
November 23, 2012 |
|
|
4,082 |
|
21 |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
5.0200 |
% |
|
November 30, 2012 |
|
|
9,618 |
|
22 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
2.2420 |
% |
|
February 28, 2013 |
|
|
5,561 |
|
23 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
5.0230 |
% |
|
May 30, 2013 |
|
|
8,262 |
|
24 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
5.2420 |
% |
|
August 6, 2013 |
|
|
27,964 |
|
25 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
5.0380 |
% |
|
August 30, 2013 |
|
|
9,101 |
|
26 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
3.5860 |
% |
|
October 23, 2013 |
|
|
3,130 |
|
27 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
3.5240 |
% |
|
October 23, 2013 |
|
|
3,063 |
|
28 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
5.0500 |
% |
|
November 30, 2013 |
|
|
9,857 |
|
29 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
2.0700 |
% |
|
December 19, 2013 |
|
|
5,715 |
|
30 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
5.2310 |
% |
|
July 25, 2014 |
|
|
11,994 |
|
31 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
5.2310 |
% |
|
July 25, 2014 |
|
|
11,998 |
|
32 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
5.1600 |
% |
|
July 25, 2014 |
|
|
23,584 |
|
33 |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
5.0405 |
% |
|
July 25, 2014 |
|
|
8,571 |
|
34 |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
5.0215 |
% |
|
July 25, 2014 |
|
|
14,218 |
|
35 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
2.6210 |
% |
|
July 25, 2014 |
|
|
4,349 |
|
36 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.1100 |
% |
|
July 25, 2014 |
|
|
5,788 |
|
37 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.2580 |
% |
|
July 25, 2014 |
|
|
6,222 |
|
38 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
2.6930 |
% |
|
October 26, 2014 |
|
|
7,504 |
(1) |
39 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
3.4470 |
% |
|
August 8, 2016 |
|
|
18,662 |
(2) |
40 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
3.4285 |
% |
|
August 19, 2016 |
|
|
12,096 |
(3) |
41 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.4010 |
% |
|
August 19, 2016 |
|
|
6,019 |
(4) |
42 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
3.5000 |
% |
|
August 30, 2016 |
|
|
12,529 |
(5) |
43 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.0050 |
% |
|
November 30, 2016 |
|
|
4,196 |
|
21
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This interest rate swap becomes effective October 26, 2011, concurrent with the termination of swap #8. |
|
(2) |
|
This interest rate swap becomes effective August 8, 2011, concurrent with the termination of swap #1. |
|
(3) |
|
This interest rate swap becomes effective August 19, 2011, concurrent with the termination of swaps #2 and #4. |
|
(4) |
|
This interest rate swap becomes effective August 19, 2011, concurrent with the termination of swap #3. |
|
(5) |
|
This interest rate swap becomes effective August 30, 2011, concurrent with the termination of swap #5. |
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The risk
managed by using derivative instruments is interest rate risk. Interest rate swaps are entered into
to manage interest rate fluctuation risk associated with the term loans in the Credit Facility.
Companies are required to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at
fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The Company designates its interest rate
swaps as cash flow hedges. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow
hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of
other comprehensive income (OCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods
during which the hedged transactions affect earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative
representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of
effectiveness are recognized in current earnings.
Assuming no change in June 30, 2011 interest rates, approximately $176.7 million of interest
expense resulting from the spread between the fixed and floating rates defined in each interest
rate swap agreement will be recognized during the next 12 months. If interest rate swaps do not
remain highly effective as a cash flow hedge, the derivatives gains or losses resulting from the
change in fair value reported through OCI will be reclassified into earnings.
The following tabular disclosure provides the amount of pre-tax loss recognized in the
condensed consolidated balance sheets as a component of OCI during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging |
|
Amount of Pre-Tax Loss Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion) |
Relationships |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
(67,685 |
) |
|
$ |
(107,656 |
) |
|
$ |
(63,572 |
) |
|
$ |
(178,564 |
) |
The following tabular disclosure provides the location of the effective portion of the pre-tax
loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) into interest expense on the
condensed consolidated statements of income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Loss Reclassified from |
|
|
AOCL into Income (Effective |
|
Amount of Pre-Tax Loss Reclassified from AOCL into Income (Effective Portion) |
Portion) |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
53,649 |
|
|
$ |
55,009 |
|
|
$ |
106,573 |
|
|
$ |
108,173 |
|
The fair values of derivative instruments in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
|
Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
|
Location |
|
Value |
|
Location |
|
Value |
|
|
Location |
|
Value |
|
Location |
|
Value |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
Other assets, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other assets, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Other
long-term
liabilities |
|
$ |
297,526 |
|
|
Other
long-term
liabilities |
|
$ |
340,526 |
|
22
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
14. FAIR VALUE
Fair Value Hierarchy
Fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a
fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would
use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in
fair value measurements, the Company utilizes the U.S. GAAP fair
value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data
obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified
within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entitys own assumption about market
participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
The inputs used to measure fair value are classified into the following fair value hierarchy:
|
Level 1: |
|
Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
Level 2: |
|
Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by
market data. |
|
|
Level 3: |
|
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and
are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 includes values
determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar
techniques reflecting the Companys own assumptions. |
In instances where the determination of the fair value hierarchy measurement is based on
inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy
within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Companys assessment of the
significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment
of factors specific to the asset or liability.
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the financial assets
and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
33,097 |
|
|
$ |
33,097 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Trading securities |
|
|
38,709 |
|
|
|
38,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
71,806 |
|
|
$ |
71,806 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of interest rate swap agreements |
|
$ |
297,526 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
297,526 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
297,526 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
297,526 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
31,570 |
|
|
$ |
31,570 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Trading securities |
|
|
35,092 |
|
|
|
35,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
66,662 |
|
|
$ |
66,662 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of interest rate swap agreements |
|
$ |
340,526 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
340,526 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
340,526 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
340,526 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Available-for-sale securities and trading securities classified as Level 1 are measured using
quoted market prices.
The valuation of the Companys interest rate swap agreements is determined using market
valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each
agreement. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the agreement, including the period to
maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including forward interest rate curves. The fair
value of interest rate swap agreements are determined by netting the discounted future fixed cash
payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based
on the expectation of future interest rates based on observable market forward interest rate curves
and the notional amount being hedged.
The Company incorporates CVAs to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance or credit
risk and the respective counterpartys nonperformance or credit risk in the fair value
measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its interest rate swap agreements for the effect of
nonperformance or credit risk, the Company has considered the impact of any netting features
included in the agreements. The CVA on the Companys interest rate swap agreements at June 30, 2011
resulted in a decrease in the fair value of the related liability of $11.6 million and an after-tax
adjustment of $7.4 million to OCI. The CVA on the Companys interest rate swap agreements at
December 31, 2010 resulted in a decrease in the fair value of the related liability of $3.9 million
and an after-tax adjustment of $2.5 million to OCI.
The majority of the inputs used to value its interest rate swap agreements, including the
forward interest rate curves and market perceptions of the Companys credit risk used in the CVAs,
are observable inputs available to a market participant. As a result, the Company has determined
that the interest rate swap valuations are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the assets recorded
at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Hospitals held for sale |
|
$ |
122,632 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
122,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
122,632 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
122,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company made the decision to sell three of its
hospitals. The carrying value of these hospitals held for sale, including an allocation of $45.3
million of reporting unit goodwill, was adjusted to the fair value,
which equals the price in the definitive sale agreements less costs to sell, resulting in an
after-tax impairment charge of $47.9 million.
15. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In August 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) 2010-24, which provides clarification to companies in the healthcare industry on the
accounting for professional liability insurance. This ASU states that receivables related to
insurance recoveries should not be netted against the related claim liability and such claim
liabilities should be determined without considering insurance recoveries. This ASU is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and was adopted by the Company on January 1,
2011. The adoption of this ASU increased other current assets by $2.5 million, other assets, net
by $41.1 million and long-term liabilities by $43.6 million in the condensed consolidated balance
sheet at June 30, 2011 and had no impact to the condensed consolidated statement of income for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011.
In August 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-23, which requires a company in the healthcare
industry to use its direct and indirect costs of providing charity care as the measurement basis
for charity care disclosures. This ASU also requires additional disclosures of the method used to
determine such costs. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2011. In the ordinary course of
business, the Company renders services to patients who are financially unable to pay for hospital
care. Included in the provision for contractual allowances is the value (at the Companys standard
charges) of these services to patients who are unable to pay that is eliminated from net operating
revenues when it is determined they qualify under the Companys charity care policy. The estimated
cost incurred by the Company to provide these services to patients who are unable to pay was
approximately $28.0 million and $25.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, and $54.1 million and $50.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. The estimated cost of these charity care services was determined using a ratio of
cost to gross charges and applying that ratio to the gross charges associated with providing care
to charity patients for the period. Gross charges associated with providing
care to charity patients includes only the related charges for those patients who are
financially unable to pay and qualify under the Companys charity care policy and that do not
otherwise qualify for reimbursement from a governmental program.
24
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
In July 2011, the
FASB issued ASU 2011-07, which requires healthcare organizations that perform services for patients for
which the ultimate collection of all or a portion of the amounts billed or billable cannot be
determined at the time services are rendered to present all bad debt expense associated with
patient service revenue as an offset to the patient service revenue line item in the statement of
operations. The ASU also requires qualitative disclosures about the Companys policy for
recognizing revenue and bad debt expense for patient service transactions and quantitative
information about the effects of changes in the assessment of collectibility of patient service
revenue. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, and will be
adopted by the Company in the first quarter of 2012. The Company is currently assessing the
potential impact the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated results of operations and
consolidated financial position.
16. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company operates in three distinct operating segments, represented by hospital operations
(which includes its general acute care hospitals and related healthcare entities that provide
inpatient and outpatient healthcare services), home care agency operations (which provide in-home
outpatient care), and hospital management services (which provides executive management and
consulting services to non-affiliated acute care hospitals). Only the hospital operations segment
meets the criteria as a separate reportable segment. The financial information for the home care
agencies and hospital management services segments do not meet the quantitative thresholds for a
separate identifiable reportable segment and are combined into the corporate and all other
reportable segment.
The distribution between reportable segments of the Companys revenues and income from
continuing operations before income taxes is summarized in the following tables (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital operations |
|
$ |
3,361,706 |
|
|
$ |
3,018,147 |
|
|
$ |
6,646,174 |
|
|
$ |
6,018,587 |
|
Corporate and all other |
|
|
72,123 |
|
|
|
62,499 |
|
|
|
141,707 |
|
|
|
130,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,433,829 |
|
|
$ |
3,080,646 |
|
|
$ |
6,787,881 |
|
|
$ |
6,149,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing
operations
before income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital operations |
|
$ |
184,426 |
|
|
$ |
171,711 |
|
|
$ |
362,539 |
|
|
$ |
331,010 |
|
Corporate and all other |
|
|
(46,731 |
) |
|
|
(40,571 |
) |
|
|
(89,147 |
) |
|
|
(75,964 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
137,695 |
|
|
$ |
131,140 |
|
|
$ |
273,392 |
|
|
$ |
255,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17. CONTINGENCIES
The Company is a party to various legal proceedings incidental to its business. In the opinion
of management, any ultimate liability with respect to these actions will not have a material
adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of
operations. With respect to all litigation matters, the Company considers the likelihood of a
negative outcome. If the Company determines the likelihood of a negative outcome is probable and
the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company records an estimated loss for the
expected outcome of the litigation. If the likelihood of a negative outcome is reasonably possible
and the Company is able to determine an estimate of the possible loss or a range of loss, the
Company discloses that fact together with the estimate of the possible loss or range of loss.
However, it is difficult to predict the outcome or estimate a possible loss or range of loss in
some instances because litigation is subject to significant uncertainties.
25
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Reasonably Possible Contingencies
For all of the legal matters below, the Company believes that a negative outcome is reasonably
possible, but the Company is unable to determine an estimate of the possible loss or a range of
loss.
On February 10, 2006, the Company received a letter from the Civil Division of the Department
of Justice requesting documents in an investigation it was conducting involving the Company. The
inquiry related to the way in which different state Medicaid programs apply to the federal
government for matching or supplemental funds that are ultimately used to pay for a small portion
of the services provided to Medicaid and indigent patients. These programs are referred to by
different names, including intergovernmental payments, upper payment limit programs, and
Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments. The February 2006 letter focused on the
Companys hospitals in three states: Arkansas, New Mexico, and South Carolina. On August 31, 2006,
the Company received a follow up letter from the Department of Justice requesting additional
documents relating to the programs in New Mexico and the payments to the Companys three hospitals
in that state. Through the beginning of 2009, the Company provided the Department of Justice with
requested documents, met with its personnel on numerous occasions, and otherwise cooperated in its
investigation. During the course of the investigation, the Civil Division notified the Company that
it believed that the Company and its three New Mexico hospitals caused the State of New Mexico to
submit improper claims for federal funds, in violation of the Federal False Claims Act. At one
point, the Civil Division calculated that the three hospitals received ineligible federal
participation payments from August 2000 to June 2006 of approximately $27.5 million and said that
if it proceeded to trial, it would seek treble damages plus an appropriate penalty for each of the
violations of the Federal False Claims Act. This investigation has culminated in the federal
governments intervention in a qui tam lawsuit styled U.S. ex rel. Baker vs. Community Health
Systems, Inc., pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico. The
federal government filed its complaint in intervention on June 30, 2009. The relator filed a second
amended complaint on July 1, 2009. Both of these complaints expand the time period during which
alleged improper payments were made. The Company filed motions to dismiss all of the federal
governments and the relators claims on August 28, 2009. On March 19, 2010, the court granted in
part and denied in part the Companys motion to dismiss as to the relators complaint. On July 7,
2010, the court denied the Companys motion to dismiss the federal governments complaint in
intervention. On July 21, 2010, the Company filed its answer and pretrial discovery began. On
June 2, 2011, the relator filed a Third Amended Complaint adding subsidiaries Community Health
Systems Professional Services Corporation and CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. as defendants. On
June 6, 2011, the government filed its First Amended Complaint in intervention adding Community
Health Systems Professional Services Corporation as a defendant. Discovery is continuing. The
discovery deadline is currently set for September 30, 2011, the deadline for filing of Motions for
Summary Judgment is November 21, 2011 and there is currently no trial date set. The Company is
vigorously defending this action.
On June 12, 2008, two of the Companys hospitals received letters from the U.S. Attorneys
Office for the Western District of New York requesting documents in an investigation it is
conducting into billing practices with respect to kyphoplasty procedures performed during the
period January 1, 2002, through June 9, 2008. On September 16, 2008, one of the Companys hospitals
in South Carolina also received an inquiry. Kyphoplasty is a surgical spine procedure that returns
a compromised vertebrae (either from trauma or osteoporotic disease process) to its previous
height, reducing or eliminating severe pain. The Company has been informed that similar
investigations have been initiated at unaffiliated facilities in Alabama, South Carolina, Indiana
and other states. The Company believes that this investigation is related to a qui tam settlement
between the same U.S. Attorneys office and the manufacturer and distributor of the Kyphon product,
which is used in performing the kyphoplasty procedure. The Company is cooperating with the
investigation by collecting and producing material responsive to the requests. The Company is
continuing to evaluate and discuss this matter with the federal government.
Matters for which an Outcome Cannot be Assessed
For all of the legal matters below, the Company cannot at this time assess what the outcome
may be and is further unable to determine any estimate of loss or range of loss. Because the
allegations were made so recently and the investigations are at a very preliminary stage, there are
not sufficient facts available to make these assessments.
On April 8, 2011, the Company received a document subpoena, dated March 31, 2011, from the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (the OIG), in
connection with an investigation of possible improper claims submitted to Medicare and Medicaid.
The subpoena, issued from the OIGs Chicago, Illinois office, requested documents from all of the
Companys hospitals and appears to concern emergency department processes and procedures, including
the Companys hospitals use of the Pro-MED Clinical Information System, which is a third-party
software system that assists with the management of patient care
and provides operational support and data collection for emergency department management and
has the ability to track discharge,
26
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
transfer and admission recommendations of emergency department
physicians. The subpoena also requested other information about the Companys relationships with
emergency department physicians, including financial arrangements. The subpoenas requests were
very similar to those contained in the Civil Investigative Demands received by the Companys Texas
hospitals from the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Texas on November 15, 2010. The
Company is continuing to cooperate with the government in this investigation.
On April 11, 2011, Tenet Healthcare Corporation (Tenet) filed suit against the Company,
Wayne T. Smith and W. Larry Cash in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
The suit alleged the Company committed violations of certain federal securities laws by making
certain statements in various proxy materials filed with the SEC in connection with the Companys
offer to purchase Tenet. Tenet alleged that the Company engaged in a practice to under-utilize
observation status and over-utilize inpatient admission status and asserts that by doing so, the
Company created undisclosed financial and legal liability to federal, state and private payors.
The suit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief and Tenets costs. On April 19, 2011, the Company
filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On April 28, 2011, the Company responded to the
allegations during its earnings release conference call as discussed in the Companys Form 8-K
furnished on April 28, 2011. On May 16, 2011, Tenet filed an amended complaint. On June 29, 2011,
the Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. A hearing on the Companys motion to
dismiss is expected to occur in September 2011. The Company will continue to vigorously defend
this suit.
On April 22, 2011, a joint motion was filed by the relator and the U.S. Department of Justice
in the case styled United States ex rel. and Reuille vs. Community Health Systems Professional
Services Corporation and Lutheran Musculoskeletal Center, LLC d/b/a Lutheran Hospital, in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. The lawsuit
was originally filed under seal on January 7, 2009. The suit is brought under the False Claims Act
and alleges that Lutheran Hospital of Indiana billed the Medicare program for (a) false 23 hour
observation after outpatient surgeries and procedures, and (b) intentional assignment of inpatient
status to one-day stays for cases that do not meet Medicare criteria for inpatient intensity of
service or severity of illness. The relator had worked in the case management department of
Lutheran Hospital of Indiana but was reassigned to another department in the fall of 2006. This
facility was acquired by the Company as part of the July 25, 2007 merger transaction with Triad.
The complaint also includes allegations of age discrimination in Ms. Reuilles 2006 reassignment
and retaliation in connection with her resignation on October 1, 2008. The Company had cooperated
fully with the government in its investigation of this matter, but had been unaware of the exact
nature of the allegations in the complaint. On December 27, 2010, the government filed a notice
that it declined to intervene in this suit. The motion contained additional information about how
the government intended to proceed with an investigation regarding allegations of improper billing
for inpatient care at other hospitals associated with Community Health Systems, Inc. . . . asserted
in other qui tam complaints in other jurisdictions. The motion stated that the Department of
Justice has consolidated its investigations of the Company and other related entities and that
the Civil Division of the Department of Justice, multiple United States Attorneys offices, and
the Office of Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services (the HHS) are now
closely coordinating their investigation of these overlapping allegations. The Attorney General of
Texas has initiated an investigation; the United States intends to work cooperatively with Texas
and any other States investigating these allegations. The motion also stated that the Office of
Audit Services for the Office of Investigations for HHS has been engaged to conduct a national
audit of certain of the Companys Medicare claims. The government confirmed that it considers the
allegations made in the complaint styled Tenet Healthcare Corporation vs. Community Health Systems,
Inc., et al. filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas
Division on April 11, 2011 to be related to the allegations in the qui tam and to what the
government is now describing as a consolidated investigation. Because qui tam suits are filed
under seal, no one but the relator and the government knows that the suit has been filed or what
allegations are being made by the relator on behalf of the government. Initially, the government
has 60 days to make a determination about whether to intervene in a case and to act as the
plaintiff or to decline to intervene and allow the relator to act as the plaintiff in the suit, but
extensions of time are frequently granted to allow the government additional time to investigate
the allegations. Even if, in the course of an investigation, the court partially unseals a
complaint to allow the government and a defendant to work to a resolution of the complaints
allegations, the defendant is prohibited from revealing to anyone even that the partial unsealing
has occurred. As the investigation proceeds, the Company may learn of additional qui tam suits
filed against the Company or its affiliated hospitals or related entities, or that contact letters,
document requests, or medical record requests the Company has received in the past from various
governmental agencies are generated from qui tam cases filed under seal. The motion filed on April
22, 2011 concluded by requesting a stay of the litigation in the Reuille case for 180 days, and on
April 25, 2011, the court granted the motion. The Companys management company subsidiary,
Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation, the defendant in the Reuille case,
consented to the request for the stay. The Company is cooperating fully with the government in its
investigations.
Three purported class action shareholder federal securities cases have been filed in the
United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee namely, Norfolk
County Retirement System v. Community Health Systems, Inc., Wayne T.
27
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Smith and W. Larry Cash, filed May 5, 2011; De Zheng v. Community Health Systems, Inc., Wayne
T. Smith and W. Larry Cash, filed May 12, 2011; and Minneapolis Firefighters Relief Association v.
Community Health Systems, Inc., Wayne T. Smith, W. Larry Cash and Thomas Mark Buford, filed June 2,
2011. All three seek class certification on behalf of purchasers of the Companys common stock
between July 27, 2006 and April 11, 2011 and allege that misleading statements resulted in
artificially inflated prices for the Companys common stock. Two shareholder derivative actions
have also been filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee; Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 630 Pension Annuity
Trust Fund v. Wayne T. Smith, W. Larry Cash, T. Mark Buford, John A. Clerico, James S. Ely III,
John A. Fry, William Norris Jennings, Julia B. North and H. Mitchell Watson, Jr., filed May 24,
2011, and Roofers Local No. 149 Pension Fund v. Wayne T. Smith, W. Larry Cash, John A. Clerico,
James S. Ely, III, John A. Fry, William Norris Jennings, Julia B. North and H. Mitchell Watson,
Jr., filed June 21, 2011. These two cases allege breach of fiduciary duty arising out of allegedly
improper inpatient admission practices, mismanagement, waste and unjust enrichment. The Company
believes all of these matters are without merit and will vigorously defend them.
The Company incurred the following pre-tax charges in connection with the Tenet acquisition
lawsuit, government investigations and shareholder lawsuits of possible improper claims submitted
to Medicare and Medicaid during the three and six months ending June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Professional fees and other related costs |
|
$ |
6,174 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,174 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company evaluated all material events occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date for
events requiring disclosure or recognition in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
In July 2011, one or more subsidiaries of the Company entered into a definitive agreement to
acquire substantially all of the assets of Moses Taylor Health Care System, located in northeast
Pennsylvania. This healthcare system includes Moses Taylor Hospital in Scranton, Pennsylvania (217
licensed beds) and Mid-Valley Hospital in Peckville, Pennsylvania (25 licensed beds). The
transaction, subject to customary federal and state regulatory approvals including review and
approval by the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, is expected to be completed
in late 2011 or early 2012.
Also in July 2011, one or more subsidiaries of the Company entered into a definitive
agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of Tomball Regional Medical Center
(357 licensed beds), located in Tomball, Texas and serving the greater northwest Houston
market. The transaction, subject to customary federal and state regulatory approvals, is
expected to be completed in 2011.
19. SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION
In connection with the consummation of the Triad acquisition, CHS obtained approximately $7.2
billion of senior secured financing under the Credit Facility and issued the Notes in the aggregate
principal amount of approximately $3.0 billion. The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of CHS
and are guaranteed on a senior basis by the Company and by certain of its existing and subsequently
acquired or organized 100% owned domestic subsidiaries.
The Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis. The following
condensed consolidating financial statements present Community Health Systems, Inc. (as parent
guarantor), CHS (as the issuer), the subsidiary guarantors, the subsidiary non-guarantors and
eliminations. These condensed consolidating financial statements have been prepared and presented
in accordance with SEC Regulation S-X Rule 3-10 Financial Statements of Guarantors and Issuers of
Guaranteed Securities Registered or Being Registered.
The accounting policies used in the preparation of this financial information are consistent
with those elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements of the Company, except as noted
below:
|
|
|
Intercompany receivables and payables are presented gross in the supplemental
consolidating balance sheets. |
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from intercompany transactions are presented in cash flows from financing
activities, as changes in intercompany balances with affiliates, net. |
28
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
|
Income tax expense is allocated from the parent guarantor to the income producing
operations (other guarantors and non-guarantors) and the issuer through stockholders
equity. As this approach represents an allocation, the income tax expense allocation is
considered non-cash for statement of cash flow purposes. |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net has been presented to reflect net interest expense and interest
income from outstanding long-term debt and intercompany balances. |
The Companys intercompany activity consists primarily of daily cash transfers for purposes of
cash management, the allocation of certain expenses and expenditures paid for by the parent on
behalf of its subsidiaries, and the push down of investment in its subsidiaries. The Companys
subsidiaries generally do not purchase services from each other; thus, the intercompany
transactions do not represent revenue generating transactions. All intercompany transactions
eliminate in consolidation.
From time to time, the Company sells and/or repurchases noncontrolling interests in
consolidated subsidiaries, which may change subsidiaries between guarantors and non-guarantors.
Amounts for prior periods are restated to reflect the status of guarantors or non-guarantors as of
June 30, 2011.
29
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
80,552 |
|
|
$ |
110,880 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
191,432 |
|
Patient accounts receivable,
net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,043,386 |
|
|
|
749,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,792,404 |
|
Supplies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,873 |
|
|
|
129,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342,268 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
115,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,819 |
|
Prepaid expenses and taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
85,760 |
|
|
|
31,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,458 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,501 |
|
|
|
64,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
115,819 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,533,072 |
|
|
|
1,085,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,734,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany receivable |
|
|
1,190,786 |
|
|
|
9,441,127 |
|
|
|
1,438,751 |
|
|
|
1,534,314 |
|
|
|
(13,604,978 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,069,371 |
|
|
|
2,437,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,506,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,380,891 |
|
|
|
1,847,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,227,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net of accumulated amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,845 |
|
|
|
594,289 |
|
|
|
644,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,356,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
1,637,169 |
|
|
|
5,856,743 |
|
|
|
2,306,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,800,021 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,943,774 |
|
|
$ |
15,415,732 |
|
|
$ |
12,322,483 |
|
|
$ |
7,548,425 |
|
|
$ |
(23,404,999 |
) |
|
$ |
14,825,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49,954 |
|
|
$ |
17,073 |
|
|
$ |
3,085 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70,112 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
402,806 |
|
|
|
181,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583,924 |
|
Current income tax payable |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
8,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,882 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,034 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,146 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
7,580 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
576,614 |
|
|
|
269,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
854,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
16,811 |
|
|
|
195,595 |
|
|
|
996,604 |
|
|
|
453,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,662,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,709,456 |
|
|
|
46,194 |
|
|
|
25,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,781,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,575,989 |
|
|
|
8,923,510 |
|
|
|
5,979,987 |
|
|
|
(19,479,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
608,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
608,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
9,765 |
|
|
|
297,525 |
|
|
|
401,585 |
|
|
|
317,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,026,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
634,753 |
|
|
|
13,778,565 |
|
|
|
10,367,893 |
|
|
|
6,776,706 |
|
|
|
(19,479,486 |
) |
|
|
12,078,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in
equity of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders
equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
932 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,119,205 |
|
|
|
663,410 |
|
|
|
709,243 |
|
|
|
120,485 |
|
|
|
(1,493,138 |
) |
|
|
1,119,205 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(6,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,678 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(200,533 |
) |
|
|
(200,533 |
) |
|
|
(10,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,607 |
|
|
|
(200,533 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,396,095 |
|
|
|
1,174,290 |
|
|
|
1,255,420 |
|
|
|
213,269 |
|
|
|
(2,642,979 |
) |
|
|
1,396,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Community Health Systems, Inc.
stockholders equity |
|
|
2,309,021 |
|
|
|
1,637,167 |
|
|
|
1,954,590 |
|
|
|
333,756 |
|
|
|
(3,925,513 |
) |
|
|
2,309,021 |
|
Noncontrolling interests in equity
of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
2,309,021 |
|
|
|
1,637,167 |
|
|
|
1,954,590 |
|
|
|
395,061 |
|
|
|
(3,925,513 |
) |
|
|
2,370,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
2,943,774 |
|
|
$ |
15,415,732 |
|
|
$ |
12,322,483 |
|
|
$ |
7,548,425 |
|
|
$ |
(23,404,999 |
) |
|
$ |
14,825,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
212,035 |
|
|
$ |
87,134 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
299,169 |
|
Patient accounts receivable,
net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
971,220 |
|
|
|
743,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,714,542 |
|
Supplies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,957 |
|
|
|
132,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329,114 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
115,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,819 |
|
Prepaid expenses and taxes |
|
|
118,464 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
89,172 |
|
|
|
11,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,218 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
138,923 |
|
|
|
54,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
234,283 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
1,608,307 |
|
|
|
1,028,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,871,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany receivable |
|
|
1,079,295 |
|
|
|
9,002,158 |
|
|
|
1,145,185 |
|
|
|
1,484,130 |
|
|
|
(12,710,768 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,816,098 |
|
|
|
2,508,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,324,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,331,452 |
|
|
|
1,818,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,150,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net of accumulated amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,352 |
|
|
|
625,472 |
|
|
|
595,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,352,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
1,510,062 |
|
|
|
5,315,871 |
|
|
|
2,061,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,887,465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,823,640 |
|
|
$ |
14,449,538 |
|
|
$ |
11,588,046 |
|
|
$ |
7,435,132 |
|
|
$ |
(21,598,233 |
) |
|
$ |
14,698,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49,953 |
|
|
$ |
11,063 |
|
|
$ |
2,123 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
63,139 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,154 |
|
|
|
164,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
526,338 |
|
Current income tax payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
8,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,882 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,297 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,415 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
7,595 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
569,991 |
|
|
|
319,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
897,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
16,477 |
|
|
|
196,817 |
|
|
|
943,324 |
|
|
|
485,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,642,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,734,473 |
|
|
|
44,819 |
|
|
|
29,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,808,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,667,662 |
|
|
|
8,385,414 |
|
|
|
5,911,829 |
|
|
|
(17,964,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
608,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
608,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
9,522 |
|
|
|
340,526 |
|
|
|
372,693 |
|
|
|
278,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,001,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
634,176 |
|
|
|
12,939,478 |
|
|
|
9,746,250 |
|
|
|
6,705,275 |
|
|
|
(17,964,905 |
) |
|
|
12,060,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in
equity of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders
equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
936 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,126,751 |
|
|
|
640,683 |
|
|
|
682,686 |
|
|
|
103,401 |
|
|
|
(1,426,770 |
) |
|
|
1,126,751 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(6,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,678 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(230,927 |
) |
|
|
(230,927 |
) |
|
|
(12,990 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,917 |
|
|
|
(230,927 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,299,382 |
|
|
|
1,100,304 |
|
|
|
1,172,099 |
|
|
|
178,069 |
|
|
|
(2,450,472 |
) |
|
|
1,299,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Community Health Systems, Inc.
stockholders equity |
|
|
2,189,464 |
|
|
|
1,510,060 |
|
|
|
1,841,796 |
|
|
|
281,472 |
|
|
|
(3,633,328 |
) |
|
|
2,189,464 |
|
Noncontrolling interests in equity
of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
2,189,464 |
|
|
|
1,510,060 |
|
|
|
1,841,796 |
|
|
|
342,385 |
|
|
|
(3,633,328 |
) |
|
|
2,250,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
2,823,640 |
|
|
$ |
14,449,538 |
|
|
$ |
11,588,046 |
|
|
$ |
7,435,132 |
|
|
$ |
(21,598,233 |
) |
|
$ |
14,698,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net operating revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,002,412 |
|
|
$ |
1,431,417 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,433,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
767,262 |
|
|
|
616,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,384,096 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259,583 |
|
|
|
173,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
433,002 |
|
Supplies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262,909 |
|
|
|
186,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449,279 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393,916 |
|
|
|
260,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
654,737 |
|
Rent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,007 |
|
|
|
31,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,431 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,559 |
|
|
|
65,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,810,236 |
|
|
|
1,334,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,144,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,176 |
|
|
|
96,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,212 |
|
|
|
123,347 |
|
|
|
17,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,230 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(35,389 |
) |
|
|
(39,072 |
) |
|
|
(45,752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,196 |
|
|
|
(12,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from
continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
35,389 |
|
|
|
16,860 |
|
|
|
114,581 |
|
|
|
79,061 |
|
|
|
(108,196 |
) |
|
|
137,695 |
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,529 |
) |
|
|
41,364 |
|
|
|
21,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
35,389 |
|
|
|
35,389 |
|
|
|
73,217 |
|
|
|
57,075 |
|
|
|
(108,196 |
) |
|
|
92,874 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations of entities
sold and held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,813 |
|
|
|
(2,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
|
Impairment of hospitals held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,562 |
) |
Loss on sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of
taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,749 |
) |
|
|
(2,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,327 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
35,389 |
|
|
|
35,389 |
|
|
|
36,468 |
|
|
|
54,497 |
|
|
|
(108,196 |
) |
|
|
53,547 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Community
Health Systems, Inc. |
|
$ |
35,389 |
|
|
$ |
35,389 |
|
|
$ |
36,468 |
|
|
$ |
36,339 |
|
|
$ |
(108,196 |
) |
|
$ |
35,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net operating revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,770,800 |
|
|
$ |
1,309,846 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,080,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663,919 |
|
|
|
567,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,231,559 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,065 |
|
|
|
146,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,002 |
|
Supplies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,931 |
|
|
|
187,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,574 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309,698 |
|
|
|
250,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
559,962 |
|
Rent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,838 |
|
|
|
32,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,851 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,401 |
|
|
|
63,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,551,852 |
|
|
|
1,247,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,799,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,948 |
|
|
|
61,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,433 |
|
|
|
118,682 |
|
|
|
13,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,759 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(70,065 |
) |
|
|
(82,583 |
) |
|
|
(27,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,966 |
|
|
|
(10,980 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
70,065 |
|
|
|
54,150 |
|
|
|
127,564 |
|
|
|
48,327 |
|
|
|
(168,966 |
) |
|
|
131,140 |
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,915 |
) |
|
|
46,694 |
|
|
|
11,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
70,065 |
|
|
|
70,065 |
|
|
|
80,870 |
|
|
|
36,345 |
|
|
|
(168,966 |
) |
|
|
88,379 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations of entities
sold and held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
(3,826 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,037 |
) |
Impairment of hospitals held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of
taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
(3,826 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,037 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
70,065 |
|
|
|
70,065 |
|
|
|
82,659 |
|
|
|
32,519 |
|
|
|
(168,966 |
) |
|
|
86,342 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Community
Health Systems, Inc. |
|
$ |
70,065 |
|
|
$ |
70,065 |
|
|
$ |
82,659 |
|
|
$ |
16,242 |
|
|
$ |
(168,966 |
) |
|
$ |
70,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net operating revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,932,956 |
|
|
$ |
2,854,925 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,787,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,510,301 |
|
|
|
1,253,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,763,463 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
499,434 |
|
|
|
333,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
832,971 |
|
Supplies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525,911 |
|
|
|
381,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
907,096 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
738,800 |
|
|
|
530,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,269,530 |
|
Rent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,608 |
|
|
|
63,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,601 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,419 |
|
|
|
130,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,525,473 |
|
|
|
2,692,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,218,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407,483 |
|
|
|
162,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
569,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,315 |
|
|
|
244,740 |
|
|
|
31,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326,448 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(96,713 |
) |
|
|
(114,604 |
) |
|
|
(77,710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
258,876 |
|
|
|
(30,151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
96,713 |
|
|
|
64,289 |
|
|
|
240,453 |
|
|
|
130,813 |
|
|
|
(258,876 |
) |
|
|
273,392 |
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,424 |
) |
|
|
86,803 |
|
|
|
34,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
96,713 |
|
|
|
96,713 |
|
|
|
153,650 |
|
|
|
96,279 |
|
|
|
(258,876 |
) |
|
|
184,479 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations of entities
sold and held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,158 |
|
|
|
(5,601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,443 |
) |
Impairment of hospitals held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,930 |
) |
Loss on sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of
taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,772 |
) |
|
|
(8,835 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,607 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
96,713 |
|
|
|
96,713 |
|
|
|
109,878 |
|
|
|
87,444 |
|
|
|
(258,876 |
) |
|
|
131,872 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Community
Health Systems, Inc. |
|
$ |
96,713 |
|
|
$ |
96,713 |
|
|
$ |
109,878 |
|
|
$ |
52,285 |
|
|
$ |
(258,876 |
) |
|
$ |
96,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net operating revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,546,129 |
|
|
$ |
2,603,129 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,149,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,342,015 |
|
|
|
1,136,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,478,240 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
442,530 |
|
|
|
290,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733,503 |
|
Supplies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
482,632 |
|
|
|
370,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
852,686 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
613,430 |
|
|
|
503,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,116,581 |
|
Rent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,253 |
|
|
|
64,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,908 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,605 |
|
|
|
123,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,109,465 |
|
|
|
2,488,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,597,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436,664 |
|
|
|
114,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,447 |
|
|
|
235,294 |
|
|
|
27,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320,182 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(140,072 |
) |
|
|
(166,296 |
) |
|
|
(50,851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
333,649 |
|
|
|
(23,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
140,072 |
|
|
|
108,849 |
|
|
|
252,221 |
|
|
|
87,553 |
|
|
|
(333,649 |
) |
|
|
255,046 |
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,223 |
) |
|
|
92,817 |
|
|
|
20,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
140,072 |
|
|
|
140,072 |
|
|
|
159,404 |
|
|
|
66,837 |
|
|
|
(333,649 |
) |
|
|
172,736 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations of entities
sold and held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,231 |
|
|
|
(7,629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,398 |
) |
Impairment of hospitals held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of
taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,231 |
|
|
|
(7,629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,398 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
140,072 |
|
|
|
140,072 |
|
|
|
165,635 |
|
|
|
59,208 |
|
|
|
(333,649 |
) |
|
|
171,338 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Community
Health Systems, Inc. |
|
$ |
140,072 |
|
|
$ |
140,072 |
|
|
$ |
165,635 |
|
|
$ |
27,942 |
|
|
$ |
(333,649 |
) |
|
$ |
140,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
1,490 |
|
|
$ |
(37,658 |
) |
|
$ |
338,117 |
|
|
$ |
282,736 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
584,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of facilities and other related equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(162,692 |
) |
|
|
(41,572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(204,264 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187,760 |
) |
|
|
(163,623 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(351,383 |
) |
Proceeds from disposition of ancillary operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,464 |
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
7,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,034 |
|
Increase in other non-operating assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,120 |
) |
|
|
(17,091 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(407,691 |
) |
|
|
(196,669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(604,360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
18,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,831 |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
Excess tax benefit relating to stock-based compensation |
|
|
4,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,659 |
|
Stock buy-back |
|
|
(50,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,002 |
) |
Proceeds from noncontrolling investors in joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
863 |
|
Redemption of noncontrolling investments in joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,303 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,303 |
) |
Distributions to noncontrolling investors in joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,078 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,078 |
) |
Changes in intercompany balances with affiliates, net |
|
|
25,022 |
|
|
|
62,908 |
|
|
|
(59,406 |
) |
|
|
(28,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,016 |
) |
|
|
(2,504 |
) |
|
|
(1,278 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,798 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(1,490 |
) |
|
|
37,658 |
|
|
|
(61,910 |
) |
|
|
(62,320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88,062 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131,484 |
) |
|
|
23,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,737 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,035 |
|
|
|
87,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
80,551 |
|
|
$ |
110,881 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
191,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(100,143 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,029 |
) |
|
$ |
539,874 |
|
|
$ |
145,090 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
541,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of facilities and other related equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
(2,024 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,413 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169,311 |
) |
|
|
(94,613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(263,924 |
) |
Proceeds from disposition of ancillary operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,307 |
|
Increase in other non-operating assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,750 |
) |
|
|
(32,508 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(199,299 |
) |
|
|
(128,989 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(328,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
53,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,615 |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit relating to stock-based compensation |
|
|
10,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,104 |
|
Stock buy-back |
|
|
(12,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,242 |
) |
Proceeds from noncontrolling investors in joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,155 |
|
Redemption of noncontrolling investments in joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,395 |
) |
Distributions to noncontrolling investors in joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,371 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,371 |
) |
Changes in intercompany balances with affiliates, net |
|
|
48,666 |
|
|
|
64,765 |
|
|
|
(73,906 |
) |
|
|
(39,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,736 |
) |
|
|
(9,996 |
) |
|
|
(2,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
100,143 |
|
|
|
43,029 |
|
|
|
(83,902 |
) |
|
|
(68,561 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,673 |
|
|
|
(52,460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
204,213 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238,495 |
|
|
|
106,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
495,168 |
|
|
$ |
53,586 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
548,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read this discussion together with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes included herein.
Throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Community Health Systems, Inc., the parent
company, and its consolidated subsidiaries are referred to on a collective basis using words like
we, our, us and the Company. This drafting style is not meant to indicate that the
publicly-traded parent company or any subsidiary of the parent company owns or operates any asset,
business, or property. The hospitals, operations and businesses described in this filing are owned
and operated, and management services provided, by distinct and indirect subsidiaries of Community
Health Systems, Inc.
Executive Overview
We are one of the largest publicly-traded operators of hospitals in the United States. We
provide healthcare services through these hospitals that we own and operate in non-urban and
selected urban markets. We generate revenue primarily by providing a broad range of general
hospital healthcare services to patients in the communities in which we are located. We currently
own and operate 133 hospitals comprised of 129 general acute care hospitals and four stand-alone
rehabilitation or psychiatric hospitals, including three hospitals held for sale. In addition, we
own and operate home care agencies, located primarily in markets where we also operate a hospital,
and through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Quorum Health Resources, LLC, or QHR, we provide
management and consulting services to non-affiliated general acute care hospitals located
throughout the United States. For the hospitals and home care agencies that we own and operate, we
are paid for our services by governmental agencies, private insurers and directly by the patients
we serve. For our management and consulting services, we are paid by the non-affiliated hospitals
utilizing our services. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we sold a multi-specialty
physician clinic and identified a hospital as held for sale. In June 2011, we entered into a
definitive agreement to sell two additional hospitals. We anticipate closing on the sale of each
of these three hospitals by September 30, 2011. Accordingly, the related results of operations,
impairment of long-lived assets held for sale and the loss on sale have been classified as
discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated statements of income for the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Our net operating revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased to approximately
$3.4 billion, as compared to approximately $3.1 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Income from continuing operations, before noncontrolling interests, for the three months ended June
30, 2011 increased 5.1% over the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $92.9 million compared to
$88.4 million. This increase in income from continuing operations during the three months ended
June 30, 2011, as compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2010, is due primarily to hospital acquisitions, higher revenues from an increase in outpatient surgeries offsetting a
decrease in inpatient admissions, an increase in the average acuity of inpatient admissions and the
elimination of certain unprofitable services in a few of our hospitals. We also benefitted from general rate and
reimbursement increases and continued to benefit from management of our labor and supply costs
which offset increases in our provisions for bad debts and other operating expenses. Net operating
revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 included revenue related to the final settlement
of a rate-related reimbursement dispute settled in our favor and other operating expenses for the
three months ended June 30, 2011 included a charge related to the final settlement of a real estate
matter against us. The amounts were individually immaterial and had a
net favorable impact on income from
continuing operations of approximately $1 million. Our successful physician recruiting efforts
continue to be a key driver in the execution of our operating strategies. Total inpatient
admissions for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased 0.6%, compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2010, and adjusted admissions for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased
5.3%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. On a same-store basis, admissions
decreased 5.6% and adjusted admissions decreased 0.7%, compared with the three months ended June
30, 2010.
Our net operating revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased to approximately
$6.8 billion, as compared to approximately $6.1 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Income from continuing operations, before noncontrolling interests, for the six months ended June
30, 2011 increased 6.8% over the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $184.5 million compared to
$172.7 million. This increase in income from continuing operations during the six months ended June
30, 2011, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010, is
due primarily to hospital acquisitions, higher revenues from an increase in outpatient surgeries offsetting a decrease in
inpatient admissions, an increase in the average acuity of inpatient admissions and the elimination
of certain unprofitable services in a few of our hospitals. We also benefitted from general rate and reimbursement increases
and continued to benefit from management of our labor and supply costs which offset increases in
our provisions for bad debts and other operating expenses. Our successful physician recruiting
efforts continue to be a key driver in the execution of our operating strategies. Total inpatient
admissions for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased 1.2%, compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2010, and adjusted
38
admissions for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased 5.1%, compared to the six months
ended June 30, 2010. On a same-store basis, admissions decreased 4.4% and adjusted admissions
decreased 0.2%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Self-pay revenues represented approximately 12.0% and 11.4% of our net operating revenues for
the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and approximately 12.2% and 11.4% of
our net operating revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The
amount of foregone revenue related to providing charity care services as a percentage of net
operating revenues was approximately 4.4% and 4.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, respectively, and approximately 4.4% and 4.0% of our net operating revenues for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Direct and indirect costs incurred by us in
providing charity care services were approximately 0.8% of net operating revenues for the
three-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and
2010.
On
July 19, 2011, we announced that one or more of our subsidiaries has executed a definitive
agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of Moses Taylor Health Care System, located in
northeast Pennsylvania. The system includes Moses Taylor Hospital (217 licensed beds) in Scranton
and Mid-Valley Hospital (25 licensed beds) in Peckville.
Also in July 2011, one or more of our subsidiaries entered into a definitive agreement to
acquire substantially all of the assets of Tomball Regional Medical Center (357 licensed
beds), located in Tomball, Texas and serving the greater northwest Houston market. The
transaction, subject to customary federal and state regulatory approvals, is expected to be
completed in 2011.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or PPACA, was signed into law on March 23,
2010. In addition, the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010, or
Reconciliation Act, which contains a number of amendments to PPACA, was signed into law on March
30, 2010. These healthcare acts, referred to collectively as the Reform Legislation, include a
mandate that requires substantially all U.S. citizens to maintain medical insurance coverage which
will ultimately increase the number of persons with access to health insurance in the United
States. The Reform Legislation should result in a reduction in uninsured patients, which should
reduce our expense from uncollectible accounts receivable; however, this legislation makes a number
of other changes to Medicare and Medicaid, such as reductions to the Medicare annual market basket
update for federal fiscal years 2010 through 2019, a productivity offset to the Medicare market
basket update beginning October 1, 2011, and a reduction to the Medicare and Medicaid
disproportionate share payments, that could adversely impact the reimbursement received under these
programs. The various provisions in the Reform Legislation that directly or indirectly affect
reimbursement are scheduled to take effect over a number of years, and we cannot predict their
impact at this time. Other provisions of the Reform Legislation, such as requirements related to
employee health insurance coverage, should increase our operating costs.
Also included in the Reform Legislation are provisions aimed at reducing fraud, waste and
abuse in the healthcare industry. These provisions allocate significant additional resources to
federal enforcement agencies and expand the use of private contractors to recover potentially
inappropriate Medicare and Medicaid payments. The Reform Legislation amends several existing
federal laws, including the federal anti-kickback statute and the False Claims Act, making it
easier for government agencies and private plaintiffs to prevail in lawsuits brought against
healthcare providers. These amendments also make it easier for potentially severe fines and
penalties to be imposed on healthcare providers accused of violating applicable laws and
regulations.
In a number of markets, we have partnered with local physicians in the ownership of our
facilities. Such investments have been permitted under an exception to the physician self-referral
law, or the Stark Law, that allows physicians to invest in an entire hospital (as opposed to
individual hospital departments). The Reform Legislation changes the whole hospital exception to
the Stark Law. The Reform Legislation permits existing physician investments in a whole hospital
to continue under a grandfather clause if the arrangement satisfies certain requirements and
restrictions, but physicians became prohibited, from the time the Reform Legislation became
effective, from increasing the aggregate percentage of their ownership in the hospital. The Reform
Legislation also restricts the ability of existing physician-owned hospitals to expand the capacity
of their facilities. Physician investments in hospitals that are under development are protected
by the grandfather clause only if the physician investments were made prior to the time the Reform
Legislation became effective and the hospital has a Medicare provider agreement with an effective
date on or prior to December 31, 2010.
The impact of the Reform Legislation on each of our hospitals will vary depending on payor mix
and a variety of other factors. We anticipate that many of the provisions in the Reform
Legislation will be subject to further clarification and modification through the rule-making
process, the development of agency guidance and judicial interpretations. Moreover, a number of
state attorneys general are challenging the legality of certain aspects of the Reform Legislation.
Currently, rulings in five separate Federal District Courts, regarding the constitutionality of the
Reform Legislation, have been split, with three courts ruling in favor of the legislation and two
courts ruling that part or all of the Reform Legislation was unconstitutional. These decisions are
likely to be appealed and may ultimately end up before the United States Supreme Court. We cannot
predict the impact the Reform Legislation may have on our business, results of operations, cash
flow, capital resources and liquidity or the ultimate outcome of the judicial rulings.
Furthermore, we cannot predict whether we will be able to modify certain aspects of our operations
to offset any potential adverse consequences from the Reform Legislation.
39
In addition to the Reform Legislation, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
included provisions for implementing health information technology under the Health Information
Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH Act. These provisions were designed to
increase the use of electronic health records, or EHR, technology and establish the requirements
for a Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments program beginning in 2011 for eligible hospitals and
providers that adopt and meaningfully use certified EHR technology. These incentive payments are
intended to offset a portion of the cost incurred to implement and qualify as a meaningful user of
EHR. Rules adopted in July 2010 by the Department of Health and Human Services established an
initial set of standards and certification criteria. Our hospital facilities are scheduled to
implement EHR technology on a facility-by-facility basis beginning in 2011. We anticipate
recognizing revenues related to the Medicare or Medicaid incentive payments as we are able to
implement the certified EHR technology and meet the defined meaningful use criteria. However,
there can be no assurance that we will ultimately qualify for these incentive payments and should
we qualify, the amounts received may vary from estimates as they are dependent on the availability
of federal funding for both Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments, timing of the approval of
state Medicaid incentive plans by the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services, or CMS, and the timing of
our ability to implement and demonstrate meaningful use of the EHR technology. The timing of
recognizing revenue from the incentive payments will not correlate with the timing of recognizing
operating expenses and incurring capital costs in connection with the implementation of EHR
technology which may result in material period-to-period changes in our future results of
operations. Hospitals that do not qualify as a meaningful user of EHR technology by 2015 are
subject to a reduced market basket update to the inpatient prospective payment system standardized
amount in 2015 and each subsequent fiscal year. Although we believe that our hospital facilities
will be in compliance with the EHR standards by 2015, there can be no assurance that all of our
facilities will be in compliance and therefore not subject to the penalty provisions of the HITECH
Act.
As a result of our current levels of cash, available borrowing capacity, long-term outlook on
our debt repayments and our continued projection of our ability to generate cash flows, we do not
anticipate a significant impact on our ability to invest the necessary capital in our business over
the next twelve months and into the foreseeable future. We believe there continues to be ample
opportunity for growth in substantially all of our markets by decreasing the need for patients to
travel outside their communities for healthcare services. Furthermore, we continue to benefit from
synergies from the acquisition of Triad Hospitals, Inc., or Triad, as well as our more recent
acquisitions and will continue to strive to improve operating efficiencies and procedures in order
to improve our profitability at all of our hospitals.
Sources of Consolidated Net Operating Revenues
The following table presents the approximate percentages of net operating revenues derived
from Medicare, Medicaid, managed care, self-pay and other sources for the periods indicated. The
data for the periods presented are not strictly comparable due to the effect that hospital
acquisitions have had on these statistics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Medicare |
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
|
27.8 |
% |
Medicaid |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
Managed Care and other
third-party payors |
|
|
51.1 |
% |
|
|
50.1 |
% |
|
|
50.8 |
% |
|
|
50.3 |
% |
Self-pay |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As shown above, we receive a substantial portion of our revenues from the Medicare and
Medicaid programs. Included in Managed Care and other third-party payors is net operating revenues
from insurance companies with which we have insurance provider contracts, Medicare Managed Care,
insurance companies for which we do not have insurance provider contracts, workers compensation
carriers, and non-patient service revenue, such as rental income and cafeteria sales. In the
future, we generally expect revenues received from the Medicare and Medicaid programs to increase
due to the general aging of the population. In addition, the Reform Legislation will increase the
number of insured patients which should reduce revenues from self-pay patients and reduce the
provision for bad debts. The Reform Legislation, however, imposes significant reductions in
amounts the government pays Medicare Managed Care plans. Other provisions in the Reform
Legislation impose minimum medical-loss ratios and require insurers to meet specific benefit
requirements. In addition, specified managed care programs, insurance companies, and employers are
actively negotiating the amounts paid to hospitals. The trend toward increased enrollment in
managed care may adversely affect our net
40
operating revenue growth. There can be no assurance that we will retain our existing reimbursement
arrangements or that these third-party payors will not attempt to further reduce the rates they pay
for our services.
Net operating revenues include amounts estimated by management to be reimbursable by Medicare
and Medicaid under prospective payment systems and provisions of cost-based reimbursement and other
payment methods. In addition, we are reimbursed by non-governmental payors using a variety of
payment methodologies. Amounts we receive for treatment of patients covered by these programs are
generally less than the standard billing rates. We account for the differences between the
estimated program reimbursement rates and the standard billing rates as contractual allowance
adjustments, which we deduct from gross revenues to arrive at net operating revenues. Final
settlements under some of these programs are subject to adjustment based on administrative review
and audit by third parties. We account for adjustments to previous program reimbursement estimates
as contractual allowance adjustments and report them in the periods that such adjustments become
known. Contractual allowance adjustments related to final settlements and previous program
reimbursement estimates impacted net operating revenues and net income by an insignificant amount
in each of the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. In the future, we
expect the percentage of revenues received from the Medicare program to increase due to the general
aging of the population.
Currently, several states utilize supplemental reimbursement programs for the purpose of
providing reimbursement to providers to offset a portion of the cost of providing care to Medicaid
and indigent patients. These programs are designed with input from CMS and are funded with a
combination of state and federal resources, including, in certain instances, fees or taxes levied
on the providers. Similar programs are also being considered by other states. After these
supplemental programs are signed into law, we recognize revenue and related expenses in the period
in which amounts are estimable and collection is reasonably assured. Reimbursement under these
programs is reflected in net operating revenues and included as Medicaid revenues in the table
above, and fees, taxes or other program related costs are reflected in other operating costs and
expenses.
The payment rates under the Medicare program for hospital inpatient and outpatient acute care
services are based on a prospective payment system, depending upon the diagnosis of a patients
condition. These rates are indexed for inflation annually, although increases have historically
been less than actual inflation. On August 16, 2010, CMS issued the final rule to adjust this index
by 2.6% for hospital inpatient acute care services that are reimbursed under the prospective
payment system. The final rule also makes other payment adjustments that, coupled with the 0.25%
reduction to hospital inpatient rates implemented pursuant to the Reform Legislation referred to
below, yield a net 0.4% reduction in reimbursement for hospital inpatient acute care services
beginning October 1, 2010. The Reform Legislation implemented a 0.25% reduction to hospital
inpatient rates effective April 1, 2010 and 0.25% reductions to hospital outpatient rates effective
each of January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2011. Reductions in the rate of increase or overall
reductions in Medicare reimbursement may cause a decline in the growth of our net operating
revenues. In addition, specified managed care programs, insurance companies and employers are
actively negotiating the amounts paid to hospitals. The trend toward increased enrollment in
managed care may adversely affect our net operating revenue growth.
Results of Operations
Our hospitals offer a variety of services involving a broad range of inpatient and outpatient
medical and surgical services. These include general acute care, emergency room, general and
specialty surgery, critical care, internal medicine, obstetrics, diagnostic services, psychiatric
and rehabilitation services. The strongest demand for hospital services generally occurs during
January through April and the weakest demand for these services occurs during the summer months.
Accordingly, eliminating the effect of new acquisitions, our net operating revenues and earnings
are historically highest during the first quarter and lowest during the third quarter.
41
The following tables summarize, for the periods indicated, selected operating data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
(Expressed as a percentage of net operating revenues) |
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Operating expenses (a) |
|
|
(86.8 |
) |
|
|
(86.1 |
) |
|
|
(86.9 |
) |
|
|
(86.3 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
June 30, 2011 |
Percentage increase (decrease) from same
period
prior year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
Admissions |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Adjusted admissions (b) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Average length of stay |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Net income attributable to Community
Health Systems, Inc. (c) |
|
|
(49.5 |
) |
|
|
(31.0 |
) |
Same-store percentage increase (decrease)
from same period prior year (d): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
Admissions |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
Adjusted admissions (b) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Operating expenses include salaries and benefits, provision for bad debts, supplies, rent and other operating expenses. |
|
(b) |
|
Adjusted admissions is a general measure of combined inpatient and outpatient volume. We computed adjusted admissions
by multiplying admissions by gross patient revenues and then dividing that number by gross inpatient revenues. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes loss from discontinued operations. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes acquired hospitals to the extent we operated them in both periods. |
42
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
Net operating revenues increased $353.2 million to approximately $3.4 billion for the three
months ended June 30, 2011, from approximately $3.1 billion for the three months ended June 30,
2010. Growth from hospitals owned throughout both periods contributed
$177.7 million of that
increase and hospitals acquired in 2010 along with the final settlement
of a rate-related reimbursement contributed $175.5 million. On a same-store basis, net
operating revenues increased 5.8%. The increased net operating revenues contributed by hospitals
that we owned throughout both periods were primarily attributable to general rate and reimbursement
increases including revenues from states with provider assessment programs.
On a consolidated basis, inpatient admissions increased by 0.6% and adjusted admissions
increased by 5.3% during the three months ended June 30, 2011. This increase in inpatient and
adjusted admissions was due primarily to acquisitions during the past twelve months. On a
same-store basis, inpatient admissions decreased by 5.6% during the three months ended June 30,
2011. This decrease in same-store inpatient admissions was due primarily to a decrease in
admissions from womens services including obstetrics and gynecology, reductions in one day stays
from the emergency room with a corresponding increase in outpatient visits, reductions in one day
stays with no emergency room charge with a corresponding increase in outpatient visits and
reductions due to competition, weather and certain service closures
in a few of our hospitals during the three months ended
June 30, 2011, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization, as a percentage of net operating
revenues, increased 0.7% to 86.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 86.1% for
the three months ended June 30, 2010. Salaries and benefits, as a percentage of net operating
revenues, increased 0.3% to 40.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 40.0% for
the three months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is due primarily to the impact of recent
acquisitions and an increase in the number of employed physicians, which offset efficiencies gained
at hospitals owned throughout both periods. Provision for bad debts as a percentage of net
operating revenues, increased 0.7% to 12.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to
11.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is due primarily to the increase in
self-pay revenues as a percentage of total net operating revenues. Supplies, as a percentage of
net operating revenues, decreased 0.9% to 13.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as
compared to 14.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. This decrease is due primarily to
lower implant costs, medical supply costs, drug costs, pacemaker costs and an improvement in
vendor rebates. Other operating expenses, as a percentage of net operating revenues, increased
0.8% to 19.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 18.2% for the three months
ended June 30, 2010. This increase is due primarily to an increase in provider taxes from states
with provider assessment programs and increased legal expenses and other costs relating to the
Tenet lawsuit, shareholder lawsuits and the governmental investigations discussed in more detail in
Legal Proceedings in Part II, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. Rent, as a percentage of net
operating revenues, decreased 0.2% to 1.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to
2.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, as
a percentage of net operating revenues, decreased 0.1% to 0.3% for the three months ended June 30,
2011, compared to 0.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Depreciation and amortization, as a percentage of net operating revenues, decreased 0.1% to
4.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 4.8% for the three months ended June
30, 2010.
Interest expense, net, increased by $2.5 million from $160.8 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 to $163.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. An increase in
interest rates during the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the three months ended June
30, 2010, resulted in an increase in interest expense of $6.4 million. These increases were offset
by a decrease in interest expense of $0.6 million due to a decrease in our average outstanding debt
during the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to June 30, 2010. Additionally, interest
expense decreased by $3.3 million as a result of more interest being capitalized during the three
months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010, as the current
year period had more major construction projects.
The net of the above mentioned changes resulted in income from continuing operations before
income taxes increasing $6.6 million from $131.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010
to $137.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Provision for income taxes increased from $42.8 million for the three months ended June 30,
2010 to $44.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, due primarily to an increase in
income from continuing operations before income taxes in the comparable period in 2010, as
discussed above. Our effective tax rates remained consistent at 32.6% for each of the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
43
Income from continuing operations, as a percentage of net operating revenues, decreased from
2.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to 2.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The
decrease in income from continuing operations, as a percentage of net operating revenues, is
primarily a result of the increases in operating expenses discussed above. Net income, as a
percentage of net operating revenues, decreased from 2.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2010
to 1.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in net income, as a percentage of
net operating revenues, is primarily due to the loss on discontinued operations from the impairment
of hospitals held for sale.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a percentage of net operating revenues,
increased 0.1% to 0.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 0.5% for the three
months ended June 30, 2010.
Net income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. was $35.4 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $70.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010,
representing a decrease of 49.5%. The decrease in net income is primarily due to the loss on
discontinued operations from the impairment of hospitals held for sale.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Net operating revenues increased $638.6 million to approximately $6.8 billion for the six
months ended June 30, 2011, from approximately $6.1 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Growth from hospitals owned throughout both periods contributed $344.2 million of that increase and
hospitals acquired in 2010 along with the final settlement of a
rate-related reimbursement dispute contributed $294.4 million. On a same-store basis, net operating
revenues increased 5.6%. The increased net operating revenues contributed by hospitals that we
owned throughout both periods were primarily attributable to general rate and reimbursement
increases including revenues from states with provider assessment programs.
On a consolidated basis, inpatient admissions increased by 1.2% and adjusted admissions
increased by 5.1% during the six months ended June 30, 2011. This increase in inpatient and
adjusted admissions was due primarily to acquisitions during the past twelve months. On a
same-store basis, inpatient admissions decreased by 4.4% during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
This decrease in same-store inpatient admissions was due primarily to a decrease in admissions from
womens services including obstetrics and gynecology, reductions in one day stays from the
emergency room with a corresponding increase in outpatient visits, reductions in one day stays with
no emergency room charge with a corresponding increase in outpatient visits and reductions due to
competition, weather and certain service closures in a few of our
hospitals during the six months ended June 30, 2011, as
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization, as a percentage of net operating
revenues, increased 0.6% to 86.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 86.3% for the
six months ended June 30, 2010. Salaries and benefits, as a percentage of net operating revenues,
increased 0.4% to 40.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 40.3% for the six
months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is due primarily to the impact of recent acquisitions
and an increase in the number of employed physicians, which offset efficiencies gained at hospitals
owned throughout both periods. Provision for bad debts as a percentage of net operating revenues,
increased 0.4% to 12.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 11.9% for the six
months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is due primarily to the increase in self-pay revenues as
a percentage of total net operating revenues. Supplies, as a percentage of net operating
revenues, decreased 0.5% to 13.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 13.9% for
the six months ended June 30, 2010. This decrease is due primarily to lower implant costs, medical
supply costs, drug costs, pacemaker costs and an improvement in vendor rebates. Other operating
expenses, as a percentage of net operating revenues, increased 0.4% to 18.6% for the six months
ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 18.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is
due primarily to an increase in provider taxes from states with provider assessment programs and
increased legal expenses and other costs relating to the Tenet lawsuit, shareholder lawsuits and
the governmental investigations discussed in more detail in Legal Proceedings in Part II,
Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. Rent, as a percentage of net operating revenues, decreased 0.1% to 1.9%
for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 2.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, as a percentage of net operating revenues,
remained consistent at 0.4% for each of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Depreciation and amortization, as a percentage of net operating revenues, remained consistent
at 4.7% for each of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Interest expense, net, increased by $6.3 million from $320.2 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 to $326.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. An increase in interest
rates during the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010,
resulted in an increase in interest expense of $11.5 million. These increases were offset by a
decrease in interest expense of $1.3 million due to a decrease in our average outstanding debt
during the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to June 30, 2010. Additionally, interest
expense decreased by $3.9 million as a result of more interest being capitalized
44
during the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010,
as the current year period had more major construction projects.
The net of the above mentioned changes resulted in income from continuing operations before
income taxes increasing $18.4 million from $255.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to
$273.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Provision for income taxes increased from $82.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010
to $88.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, due primarily to an increase in income
from continuing operations before income taxes in the comparable period in 2010, as discussed
above. Our effective tax rates were 32.5% and 32.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, respectively.
Income from continuing operations, as a percentage of net operating revenues, decreased from
2.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to 2.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The
decrease in income from continuing operations, as a percentage of net operating revenues, is
primarily a result of the increased operating costs as a percentage of net revenue discussed above.
Net income, as a percentage of net operating revenues, decreased from 2.8% for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 to 1.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in net income, as
a percentage of net operating revenues, is primarily due to the loss on discontinued operations
from the loss on sale, impairment of hospitals held for sale and loss on entities sold and held for
sale.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a percentage of net operating revenues,
remained consistent at 0.5% for each of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Net income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. was $96.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2011, compared to $140.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
representing a decrease of 31.0%. The decrease in net income is primarily due to the loss on
discontinued operations from the loss on sale, impairment of hospitals held for sale and loss on
entities sold and held for sale.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $42.9 million, from $541.8 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 to $584.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The
increase in cash provided by operating activities, in comparison to the prior year period, is
primarily due to an increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $23.3 million, impairment
of long-lived assets of $47.9 million, an increase in all other non-cash expenses of $15.7 million,
an increase in cash flow from the change in supplies, prepaid expenses and other current assets of
$10.5 million and an increase in cash flow from the change in accounts payable, accrued liabilities
and income taxes of $15.4 million, due primarily to the timing of payments during the periods.
These increases were offset by a decrease in net income of $39.5 million, a decrease in cash flow
from the change in accounts receivable of $19.2 million and a decrease in cash flow from the change
in other assets and liabilities of $11.2 million.
The cash used in investing activities was $604.4 million for the six months ended June 30,
2011, compared to $328.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in cash used
in investing activities, in comparison to the prior year period, is primarily due to an increase in
cash used for acquisition of facilities and other related equipment of $201.9 million, an increase
in cash used for purchasing property and equipment of $87.5 million and an increase in cash used
for other assets, which consists primarily of purchases and development of
internal-use software and payments made under non-employee physician recruiting agreements, of
$10.9 million. Other changes in cash used in investing activities were an increase in proceeds
from the disposition of ancillary operations of $18.5 million and an increase in proceeds received
from the sale of property and equipment of $5.7 million.
The cash used in financing activities was $88.1 million for the six months ended June 30,
2011, compared to $9.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in cash used in
financing activities, in comparison to the prior year period, is due primarily to a decrease in
proceeds from the exercise of stock options and an increase in cash used to purchase outstanding
shares under our open market repurchase program.
Capital Expenditures
Cash expenditures related to purchases of facilities were $204.3 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2011, compared to $2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The
expenditures during the six months ended June 30, 2011 were for the purchase of three hospitals in
Pennsylvania, surgery centers and physician practices and the settlement of working capital items
from 2010
45
acquisitions. The expenditures during the six months ended June 30, 2010 were for the purchase
of non-hospital facilities and the settlement of working capital items from a prior year
acquisition, and no hospitals were acquired during that period.
Excluding the cost to construct replacement hospitals, our cash expenditures for routine
capital for the six months ended June 30, 2011 totaled $269.3 million, compared to $260.4 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2010. These capital expenditures related primarily to the
purchase of additional equipment, minor renovations and information systems infrastructure. Costs
to construct replacement hospitals for the six months ended June 30, 2011 totaled $82.1 million,
compared to $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The costs to construct replacement
hospitals for the six months ended June 30, 2011 represented both planning and construction costs
for the four replacement hospitals discussed below. The costs to construct replacement hospitals
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 represented planning costs for future construction projects
since there were no replacement hospitals under construction.
Pursuant
to purchase agreements in effect as of June 30, 2011 and where
certificate of need approval has been
obtained, we have commitments to build the following three replacement facilities: As required by
an amendment to our lease agreement entered into in 2005, we agreed to build a replacement hospital
at our Barstow, California location by November 2012. As part of an acquisition in 2007, we agreed
to build a replacement hospital in Valparaiso, Indiana by
April 2011; however, due to delays in
receiving government approved building and zoning permits, completion is not expected until the
fourth quarter of 2012. These delays did not result in any penalties under the terms of the
agreement and we do not expect such delays to result in any significant increase in the costs to
construct the replacement facility. As part of an acquisition in 2009, we agreed to build a
replacement hospital in Siloam Springs, Arkansas by February 2013. Construction costs, including
equipment costs, for these three replacement facilities are currently estimated to be approximately
$318.5 million, of which approximately $128.3 million has been incurred to date. In addition, in
October 2008, after the purchase of the noncontrolling owners interest in our Birmingham, Alabama
facility, we initiated the purchase of a site, which includes a partially constructed hospital
structure, for a potential replacement to our existing Birmingham facility. In September 2010, we
received approval of our request for a certificate of need from the Alabama Certificate of Need
Review Board; however, this certificate of need remains subject to an appeal process. Our
estimated construction costs, including the acquisition of the site and equipment costs, are
approximately $280.0 million for the Birmingham replacement facility.
Capital Resources
Net working capital was approximately $1.072 billion at June 30, 2011, compared to
approximately $1.229 billion at December 31, 2010. The decrease in net working capital is
primarily due to the use of free cash flow and cash on hand to
complete acquisitions of a hospital system
and several physician practices, repurchase outstanding shares under our repurchase
program, and make repayments of certain long-term indebtedness.
In connection with the consummation of the Triad acquisition in July 2007, we obtained
approximately $7.2 billion of senior secured financing under a Credit Facility with a syndicate of
financial institutions led by Credit Suisse, as administrative agent and collateral agent. The
Credit Facility consisted of an approximately $6.1 billion funded term loan facility with a
maturity of seven years, a $300 million delayed draw term loan facility (reduced by us from $400
million) with a maturity of seven years and a $750 million revolving credit facility with a
maturity of six years. During the fourth quarter of 2008, $100 million of the delayed draw term
loan had been drawn down by us, reducing the delayed draw term loan availability to $200 million at
December 31, 2008. In January 2009, we drew down the remaining $200 million of the delayed draw
term loan. The revolving credit facility also includes a subfacility for letters of credit and a
swingline subfacility. The Credit Facility requires quarterly amortization payments of each term
loan facility equal to 0.25% of the outstanding amount of the term loans. On November 5, 2010, we
entered into an amendment and restatement of our existing Credit Facility. The amendment extends
by two and a half years, until January 25, 2017, the maturity date of $1.5 billion of the existing
term loans under the Credit Facility and increases the pricing on these term loans to London
Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus 350 basis points. If more than $50 million of our Notes
remain outstanding on April 15, 2015, without having been refinanced, then the maturity date for
the extended term loans will be accelerated to April 15, 2015. The maturity date of the balance of
the term loans of approximately $4.5 billion remains unchanged at July 25, 2014. The amendment
also increases our ability to issue additional indebtedness under the uncommitted incremental
facility to $1.0 billion from $600 million, permits us to issue Term A term loans under the
incremental facility, and provides up to $2.0 billion of borrowing capacity from receivable
transactions, an increase of $0.5 billion, of which $1.7 billion would be required to be used for
repayment of existing term loans.
The term loan facility must be prepaid in an amount equal to (1) 100% of the net cash proceeds
of certain asset sales and dispositions by us and our subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions
and reinvestment rights, (2) 100% of the net cash proceeds of issuances of certain debt obligations
or receivables based financing by us and our subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions, and (3)
50%, subject to reduction to a lower percentage based on our leverage ratio (as defined in the
Credit Facility generally as the ratio of total debt on the date of determination to our EBITDA, as
defined, for the four quarters most recently ended prior to such date), of
46
excess cash flow (as defined) for any year, commencing in 2008, subject to certain exceptions.
Voluntary prepayments and commitment reductions are permitted in whole or in part, without any
premium or penalty, subject to minimum prepayment or reduction requirements.
The obligor under the Credit Facility is CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., or CHS, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Community Health Systems, Inc. All of our obligations under the Credit
Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by Community Health Systems, Inc. and certain existing and
subsequently acquired or organized domestic subsidiaries. All obligations under the Credit Facility
and the related guarantees are secured by a perfected first priority lien or security interest in
substantially all of the assets of Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS and each subsidiary
guarantor, including equity interests held by us or any subsidiary guarantor, but excluding, among
others, the equity interests of non-significant subsidiaries, syndication subsidiaries,
securitization subsidiaries and joint venture subsidiaries.
The loans under the Credit Facility bear interest on the outstanding unpaid principal amount
at a rate equal to an applicable percentage plus, at our option, either (a) an Alternate Base Rate
(as defined) determined by reference to the greater of (1) the Prime Rate (as defined) announced by
Credit Suisse or (2) the Federal Funds Effective Rate (as defined) plus one-half of 1.0% or (3) the
adjusted LIBOR rate on such day for a three-month interest period commencing on the second business
day after such day plus 1%, or (b) a reserve adjusted LIBOR for dollars (Eurodollar rate) (as
defined). The applicable percentage for Alternate Base Rate loans is 1.25% for term loans due 2014
and 2.25% for term loans due 2017. The applicable percentage for Eurodollar rate loans is 2.25%
for term loans due 2014 and 3.5% for term loans due 2017. The applicable percentage for revolving
loans was initially 1.25% for Alternate Base Rate revolving loans and 2.25% for Eurodollar
revolving loans, in each case subject to reduction based on our leverage ratio. Loans under the
swingline subfacility bear interest at the rate applicable to Alternate Base Rate loans under the
revolving credit facility.
We have agreed to pay letter of credit fees equal to the applicable percentage then in effect
with respect to Eurodollar rate loans under the revolving credit facility times the maximum
aggregate amount available to be drawn under all letters of credit outstanding under the
subfacility for letters of credit. The issuer of any letter of credit issued under the subfacility
for letters of credit will also receive a customary fronting fee and other customary processing
charges. We were initially obligated to pay commitment fees of 0.50% per annum (subject to
reduction based upon our leverage ratio), on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility.
For purposes of this calculation, swingline loans are not treated as usage of the revolving credit
facility. With respect to the delayed draw term loan facility, we were also obligated to pay
commitment fees of 0.50% per annum for the first nine months after the close of the Credit Facility
and 0.75% per annum for the next three months after such nine-month period and thereafter 1.0% per
annum. In each case, the commitment fee was based on the unused amount of the delayed draw term
loan facility. After the draw down of the remaining $200 million of the delayed draw term loan in
January 2009, we no longer pay any commitment fees for the delayed draw term loan facility. We also
paid arrangement fees on the closing of the Credit Facility and pay an annual administrative agent
fee.
The Credit Facility contains customary representations and warranties, subject to limitations
and exceptions, and customary covenants restricting our and our subsidiaries ability, subject to
certain exceptions, to, among other things, (1) declare dividends, make distributions or redeem or
repurchase capital stock, (2) prepay, redeem or repurchase other debt, (3) incur liens or grant
negative pledges, (4) make loans and investments and enter into acquisitions and joint ventures,
(5) incur additional indebtedness or provide certain guarantees, (6) make capital expenditures, (7)
engage in mergers, acquisitions and asset sales, (8) conduct transactions with affiliates, (9)
alter the nature of our businesses, (10) grant certain guarantees with respect to physician
practices, (11) engage in sale and leaseback transactions or (12) change our fiscal year. We and
our subsidiaries are also required to comply with specified financial covenants (consisting of a
leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio) and various affirmative covenants.
Events of default under the Credit Facility include, but are not limited to, (1) our failure
to pay principal, interest, fees or other amounts under the credit agreement when due (taking into
account any applicable grace period), (2) any representation or warranty proving to have been
materially incorrect when made, (3) covenant defaults subject, with respect to certain covenants,
to a grace period, (4) bankruptcy events, (5) a cross default to certain other debt, (6) certain
undischarged judgments (not paid within an applicable grace period), (7) a change of control, (8)
certain ERISA-related defaults and (9) the invalidity or impairment of specified security
interests, guarantees or subordination provisions in favor of the administrative agent or lenders
under the Credit Facility.
As of June 30, 2011, the availability for additional borrowings under our Credit Facility was
approximately $750 million pursuant to the revolving credit facility, of which $37.9 million was
set aside for outstanding letters of credit. We believe that these funds, along with internally
generated cash and continued access to the bank credit and capital markets, will be sufficient to
finance future acquisitions, capital expenditures and working capital requirements through the next
12 months and into the foreseeable future.
47
As of June 30, 2011, we are a party to the following interest rate swap agreements to limit
the effect of changes in interest rates on approximately 90% of our variable rate debt. On each of
these swaps, we receive a variable rate of interest based on the three-month LIBOR in exchange for
the payment by us of a fixed rate of interest. We currently pay, on a quarterly basis, a margin
above LIBOR of 225 basis points for revolving credit and term loans due 2014 and 350 basis points
for term loans due 2017 under the Credit Facility.
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Fixed Interest |
|
Termination |
|
Fair Value |
Swap # |
|
(in 000s) |
|
Rate |
|
Date |
|
(in 000s) |
1
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
|
5.1140 |
% |
|
August 8, 2011
|
|
$ |
1,533 |
|
2
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
4.7185 |
% |
|
August 19, 2011
|
|
|
605 |
|
3
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
4.7040 |
% |
|
August 19, 2011
|
|
|
603 |
|
4
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
4.6250 |
% |
|
August 19, 2011
|
|
|
592 |
|
5
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
4.9300 |
% |
|
August 30, 2011
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
6
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
3.0920 |
% |
|
September 18, 2011
|
|
|
1,248 |
|
7
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.0230 |
% |
|
October 23, 2011
|
|
|
869 |
|
8
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
4.4815 |
% |
|
October 26, 2011
|
|
|
2,712 |
|
9
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
4.0840 |
% |
|
December 3, 2011
|
|
|
3,279 |
|
10
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.8470 |
% |
|
January 4, 2012
|
|
|
1,822 |
|
11
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.8510 |
% |
|
January 4, 2012
|
|
|
1,824 |
|
12
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.8560 |
% |
|
January 4, 2012
|
|
|
1,826 |
|
13
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
3.7260 |
% |
|
January 8, 2012
|
|
|
3,610 |
|
14
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
3.5065 |
% |
|
January 16, 2012
|
|
|
3,514 |
|
15
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
5.0185 |
% |
|
May 30, 2012
|
|
|
10,654 |
|
16
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
5.0250 |
% |
|
May 30, 2012
|
|
|
6,401 |
|
17
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
4.6845 |
% |
|
September 11, 2012
|
|
|
10,208 |
|
18
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.3520 |
% |
|
October 23, 2012
|
|
|
3,798 |
|
19
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
4.3745 |
% |
|
November 23, 2012
|
|
|
6,794 |
|
20
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
4.3800 |
% |
|
November 23, 2012
|
|
|
4,082 |
|
21
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
5.0200 |
% |
|
November 30, 2012
|
|
|
9,618 |
|
22
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
2.2420 |
% |
|
February 28, 2013
|
|
|
5,561 |
|
23
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
5.0230 |
% |
|
May 30, 2013
|
|
|
8,262 |
|
24
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
5.2420 |
% |
|
August 6, 2013
|
|
|
27,964 |
|
25
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
5.0380 |
% |
|
August 30, 2013
|
|
|
9,101 |
|
26
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
3.5860 |
% |
|
October 23, 2013
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
27
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
3.5240 |
% |
|
October 23, 2013
|
|
|
3,063 |
|
28
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
5.0500 |
% |
|
November 30, 2013
|
|
|
9,857 |
|
29
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
2.0700 |
% |
|
December 19, 2013
|
|
|
5,715 |
|
30
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
5.2310 |
% |
|
July 25, 2014
|
|
|
11,994 |
|
31
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
5.2310 |
% |
|
July 25, 2014
|
|
|
11,998 |
|
32
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
5.1600 |
% |
|
July 25, 2014
|
|
|
23,584 |
|
33
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
5.0405 |
% |
|
July 25, 2014
|
|
|
8,571 |
|
34
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
5.0215 |
% |
|
July 25, 2014
|
|
|
14,218 |
|
35
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
2.6210 |
% |
|
July 25, 2014
|
|
|
4,349 |
|
36
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.1100 |
% |
|
July 25, 2014
|
|
|
5,788 |
|
37
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.2580 |
% |
|
July 25, 2014
|
|
|
6,222 |
|
38
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
2.6930 |
% |
|
October 26, 2014
|
|
|
7,504 |
(1)
|
39
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
3.4470 |
% |
|
August 8, 2016
|
|
|
18,662 |
(2)
|
40
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
3.4285 |
% |
|
August 19, 2016
|
|
|
12,096 |
(3)
|
41
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.4010 |
% |
|
August 19, 2016
|
|
|
6,019 |
(4)
|
42
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
3.5000 |
% |
|
August 30, 2016
|
|
|
12,529 |
(5)
|
43
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.0050 |
% |
|
November 30, 2016
|
|
|
4,196 |
|
49
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This interest rate swap becomes effective October 26, 2011, concurrent with the termination of swap #8. |
|
(2) |
|
This interest rate swap becomes effective August 8, 2011, concurrent with the termination of swap #1. |
|
(3) |
|
This interest rate swap becomes effective August 19,
2011, concurrent with the termination of swaps #2 and #4. |
|
(4) |
|
This interest rate swap becomes effective August 19, 2011, concurrent with the termination of swap #3. |
|
(5) |
|
This interest rate swap becomes effective August 30, 2011, concurrent with the termination of swap #5. |
The Credit Facility and/or the Notes contain various covenants that limit our ability to take
certain actions including, among other things, our ability to:
|
|
|
incur, assume or guarantee additional indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
issue redeemable stock and preferred stock; |
|
|
|
|
repurchase capital stock; |
|
|
|
|
make restricted payments, including paying dividends and making investments; |
|
|
|
|
redeem debt that is junior in right of payment to the notes; |
|
|
|
|
create liens without securing the notes; |
|
|
|
|
sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
enter into agreements that restrict dividends from subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
merge, consolidate, sell or otherwise dispose of substantial portions of our assets; |
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates; and |
|
|
|
|
guarantee certain obligations. |
In addition, our Credit Facility contains restrictive covenants and requires us to maintain
specified financial ratios and satisfy other financial condition tests. Our ability to meet these
restricted covenants and financial ratios and tests can be affected by events beyond our control,
and we cannot assure you that we will meet those tests. A breach of any of these covenants could
result in a default under our Credit Facility and/or the Notes. Upon the occurrence of an event of
default under our Credit Facility or the Notes, all amounts outstanding under our Credit Facility
and the Notes may become due and payable and all commitments under the Credit Facility to extend
further credit may be terminated.
We believe that internally generated cash, availability for additional borrowings under our
Credit Facility of $750 million (consisting of a $750 million revolving credit facility, of which
$37.9 million is set aside for outstanding letters of credit as of June 30, 2011) and our ability
to amend the Credit Facility to provide for one or more tranches of term loans in an aggregate
principal amount of $1.0 billion, our ability to add up to $300 million of borrowing capacity from
receivable transactions (including securitizations) and our continued access to the bank credit and
capital markets will be sufficient to finance acquisitions, capital expenditures and working
capital requirements through the next 12 months. We believe these same sources of cash, borrowings
under our Credit Facility as well as access to bank credit and capital markets will be available to
us beyond the next 12 months and into the foreseeable future.
50
On December 22, 2008, we filed a universal automatic shelf registration statement on Form
S-3ASR that will permit us, from time to time, in one or more public offerings, to offer debt
securities, common stock, preferred stock, warrants, depositary shares, or any combination of such
securities. The shelf registration statement will also permit our subsidiary, CHS, to offer debt
securities that would be guaranteed by us, from time to time in one or more public offerings. The
terms of any such future offerings would be established at the time of the offering.
The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the six months ended June 30, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1) |
|
1.70x |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
There are no shares of preferred stock outstanding. |
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
Our consolidated operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, included
$125.8 million and $120.5 million, respectively, of net operating revenues and $10.1 million and
$11.3 million, respectively, of income from operations generated from five hospitals operated by us
under operating lease arrangements. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP, the respective assets and the future lease obligations
under these arrangements are not recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. Lease costs
under these arrangements are included in rent expense and totaled approximately $6.0 million and
$6.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The current terms of
these operating leases expire between June 2012 and December 2020, not including lease extension
options. If we allow these leases to expire, we would no longer generate revenue nor incur expenses
from these hospitals.
In the past, we have utilized operating leases as a financing tool for obtaining the
operations of specified hospitals without acquiring, through ownership, the related assets of the
hospital and without a significant outlay of cash at the front end of the lease. We utilize the
same operating strategies to improve operations at those hospitals held under operating leases as
we do at those hospitals that we own. We have not entered into any operating leases for hospital
operations since December 2000.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, we entered into an agreement with the lessor of
Cleveland Regional Medical Center, or Cleveland Regional, our leased facility in Cleveland, TX, to
exchange our ownership interest in certain real estate at Hill Regional Medical Center, or Hill
Regional, in Hillsboro, TX for the lessors ownership interest in the real estate at Cleveland
Regional. The related lease agreement was amended to incorporate Hill Regional as a leased asset
with no change to the remaining lease term or payment schedule. No monetary consideration was
exchanged in this transaction, and the transaction qualifies as a non-taxable, like-kind exchange
under the regulations in Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. The assets of Cleveland
Regional were recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at fair value on the date of
this transaction; however, as a result of our continuing involvement in the Hill Regional assets,
the exchange with the lessor does not qualify for sale treatment under U.S. GAAP. Accordingly, the
transaction has been accounted for as a financing obligation and the assets of Hill Regional will
remain on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as assets recorded under a financing obligation.
Starting in the fourth quarter of 2010, future payments under the lease are amortized against the
financing obligation rather than recorded as rent expense.
Noncontrolling Interests
We have sold noncontrolling interests in certain of our subsidiaries or acquired subsidiaries
with existing noncontrolling interest ownership positions. As of June 30, 2011, we have hospitals
in 24 of the markets we serve, with noncontrolling physician ownership interests ranging from less
than 1% to 40%, including one hospital that also had a non-profit entity as a partner. In addition,
we have three other hospitals with noncontrolling interests owned by non-profit entities.
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries was $376.7 million and
$387.5 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Noncontrolling interests
in equity of consolidated subsidiaries was $61.3 million and $60.9 million as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. The amount of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
was $18.2 million and $16.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, and $35.2 million and $31.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. As a result of the change in the Stark Law whole hospital exception included in
the Reform Legislation, we will not introduce physician ownership at any of our wholly-owned
facilities or increase the aggregate percentage of physician ownership in any of our existing joint
ventures.
51
Reimbursement, Legislative and Regulatory Changes
The Reform Legislation was enacted in the context of other ongoing legislative and regulatory
efforts, which would reduce or otherwise adversely affect the payments we receive from Medicare and
Medicaid. Within the statutory framework of the Medicare and Medicaid programs, including programs
currently unaffected by the Reform Legislation, there are substantial areas subject to
administrative rulings, interpretations, and discretion which may further affect payments made
under those programs, and the federal and state governments might, in the future, reduce the funds
available under those programs or require more stringent utilization and quality reviews of
hospital facilities. Additionally, there may be a continued rise in managed care programs and
additional restructuring of the financing and delivery of healthcare in the United States. These
events could cause our future financial results to decline. We cannot estimate the impact of
Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement changes that have been enacted or are under consideration. We
cannot predict whether additional reimbursement reductions will be made or whether any such changes
would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, results of operations,
cash flow, capital resources and liquidity.
Inflation
The healthcare industry is labor intensive. Wages and other expenses increase during periods
of inflation and when labor shortages occur in the marketplace. In addition, our suppliers pass
along rising costs to us in the form of higher prices. We have implemented cost control measures,
including our case and resource management program, to curb increases in operating costs and
expenses. We have generally offset increases in operating costs by increasing reimbursement for
services, expanding services and reducing costs in other areas. However, we cannot predict our
ability to cover or offset future cost increases, particularly any increases in our cost of
providing health insurance benefits to our employees as a result of the Reform Legislation.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based
upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements. Actual
results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments
and uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different results under different
assumptions and conditions. We believe that our critical accounting policies are limited to those
described below.
Third Party Reimbursement
Net operating revenues include amounts estimated by management to be reimbursable by Medicare
and Medicaid under prospective payment systems and provisions of cost-reimbursement and other
payment methods. In addition, we are reimbursed by non-governmental payors using a variety of
payment methodologies. Amounts we receive for treatment of patients covered by these programs are
generally less than the standard billing rates. Contractual allowances are automatically calculated
and recorded through our internally developed automated contractual allowance system. Within the
automated system, actual Medicare DRG data and payors historical paid claims data are utilized to
calculate the contractual allowances. This data is automatically updated on a monthly basis. All
hospital contractual allowance calculations are subjected to monthly review by management to ensure
reasonableness and accuracy. We account for the differences between the estimated program
reimbursement rates and the standard billing rates as contractual allowance adjustments, which we
deduct from gross revenues to arrive at net operating revenues. The process of estimating
contractual allowances requires us to estimate the amount expected to be received based on payor
contract provisions. The key assumption in this process is the estimated contractual reimbursement
percentage, which is based on payor classification and historical paid claims data. Due to the
complexities involved in these estimates, actual payments we receive could be different from the
amounts we estimate and record. If the actual contractual reimbursement percentage under government
programs and managed care contracts differed by 1% at June 30, 2011 from our estimated
reimbursement percentage, net income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 would have changed by
approximately $33.0 million, and net accounts receivable at June 30, 2011 would have changed by
$52.3 million. Final settlements under some of these programs are subject to adjustment based on
administrative review and audit by third parties. We account for adjustments to previous program
reimbursement estimates as contractual allowance adjustments and report them in the periods that
such adjustments become known. Contractual allowance adjustments related to final settlements and
previous program reimbursement estimates impacted net operating revenues and net income by an
insignificant amount in each of the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
52
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Substantially all of our accounts receivable are related to providing healthcare services to
our hospitals patients. Collection of these accounts receivable is our primary source of cash and
is critical to our operating performance. Our primary collection risks relate to uninsured patients
and outstanding patient balances for which the primary insurance payor has paid some but not all of
the outstanding balance, with the remaining outstanding balance (generally deductibles and
co-payments) owed by the patient. At the point of service, for patients required to make a
co-payment, we generally collect less than 15% of the related revenue. For all procedures scheduled
in advance, our policy is to verify insurance coverage prior to the date of the procedure.
Insurance coverage is not verified in advance of procedures for walk-in and emergency room
patients.
We estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts by reserving a percentage of all self-pay
accounts receivable without regard to aging category, based on collection history, adjusted for
expected recoveries and, if present, anticipated changes in trends. For all other non-self-pay
payor categories, we reserve 100% of all accounts aging over 365 days from the date of discharge.
The percentage used to reserve for all self-pay accounts is based on our collection history. We
believe that we collect substantially all of our third-party insured receivables, which include
receivables from governmental agencies.
Collections are impacted by the economic ability of patients to pay and the effectiveness of
our collection efforts. Significant changes in payor mix, business office operations, economic
conditions or trends in federal and state governmental healthcare coverage could affect our
collection of accounts receivable. The process of estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts
requires us to estimate the collectability of self-pay accounts receivable, which is primarily
based on our collection history, adjusted for expected recoveries and, if available, anticipated
changes in collection trends. Significant change in payor mix, business office operations, economic
conditions, trends in federal and state governmental healthcare coverage or other third-party
payors could affect our estimates of accounts receivable collectability. If the actual collection
percentage differed by 1% at June 30, 2011 from our estimated collection percentage as a result of
a change in expected recoveries, net income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 would have
changed by $18.3 million, and net accounts receivable at June 30, 2011 would have changed by $29.1
million. We also continually review our overall reserve adequacy by monitoring historical cash
collections as a percentage of trailing net revenue less provision for bad debts, as well as by
analyzing current period net revenue and admissions by payor classification, aged accounts
receivable by payor, days revenue outstanding and the impact of recent acquisitions and
dispositions.
Our policy is to write-off gross accounts receivable if the balance is under $10.00 or when
such amounts are placed with outside collection agencies. We believe this policy accurately
reflects our ongoing collection efforts and is consistent with industry practices. We had
approximately $2.2 billion and $2.1 billion at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively,
being pursued by various outside collection agencies. We expect to collect less than 3%, net of
estimated collection fees, of the amounts being pursued by outside collection agencies. As these
amounts have been written-off, they are not included in our gross accounts receivable or our
allowance for doubtful accounts. Collections on amounts previously written-off are recognized as a
reduction to bad debt expense when received. However, we take into consideration estimated
collections of these future amounts written-off in evaluating the reasonableness of our allowance
for doubtful accounts.
All of the following information is derived from our hospitals, excluding clinics, unless
otherwise noted.
Patient accounts receivable from our hospitals represent approximately 95% of our total
consolidated accounts receivable.
Days revenue outstanding was 47 days and 46 days at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. Our target range for days revenue outstanding is 46 to 56 days.
Total gross accounts receivable (prior to allowance for contractual adjustments and doubtful
accounts) was approximately $7.7 billion and $7.2 billion as of June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively.
53
The approximate percentage of total gross accounts receivable (prior to allowances for
contractual adjustments and doubtful accounts) summarized by payor category is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Insured receivables |
|
|
63.7 |
% |
|
|
63.9 |
% |
Self-pay receivables |
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
36.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the hospital segment, the combined total of the allowance for doubtful accounts for
self-pay accounts receivable and related allowances for other self-pay discounts and contractuals,
as a percentage of gross self-pay receivables, was approximately 84% at both June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010. If the receivables that have been written-off, but where collections are still
being pursued by outside collection agencies, were included in both the allowances and gross
self-pay receivables specified above, the percentage of combined allowances to total self-pay
receivables would have been approximately 91% at both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Goodwill represents the excess of the fair value of the consideration conveyed in the
acquisition over the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment at the
same time every year and when an event occurs or circumstances change that, more likely than not,
reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. There is a two-step method
for determining goodwill impairment. Step one is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit
with the units carrying amount, including goodwill. If this test indicates the fair value is less
than the carrying value, then step two is required to compare the implied fair value of the
reporting units goodwill with the carrying value of the reporting units goodwill. We have
selected September 30 as our annual testing date. Based on the results of our most recent annual
impairment test, we have concluded that we do not have any reporting units that are at risk of
failing step one of the goodwill impairment test.
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values of certain
long-lived assets may be impaired, we project the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated
by these assets. If the projections indicate that the reported amounts are not expected to be
recovered, such amounts are reduced to their estimated fair value based on a quoted market price,
if available, or an estimate based on valuation techniques available in the circumstances.
Professional Liability Insurance Claims
As part of our business of owning and operating hospitals, we are subject to legal actions
alleging liability on our part. We accrue for losses resulting from such liability claims, as well
as loss adjustment expenses that are out-of-pocket and directly related to such liability claims.
These direct out-of-pocket expenses include fees of outside counsel and experts. We do not accrue
for costs that are part of our corporate overhead, such as the costs of our in-house legal and risk
management departments. The losses resulting from professional liability claims primarily consist
of estimates for known claims, as well as estimates for incurred but not reported claims. The
estimates are based on specific claim facts, our historical claim reporting and payment patterns,
the nature and level of our hospital operations, and actuarially determined projections. The
actuarially determined projections are based on our actual claim data, including historic reporting
and payment patterns which have been gathered over approximately a 20-year period. As discussed
below, although we purchase excess insurance on a claims-made basis that transfers risk to
third-party insurers, the liability we accrue does include an amount for the losses covered by our
excess insurance. We also record a receivable for the expected reimbursement of losses covered by
our excess insurance. Since we believe that the amount and timing of our future claims payments
are reliably determinable, we discount the amount we accrue for losses resulting from professional
liability claims using the risk-free interest rate corresponding to the timing of our expected
payments.
The net present value of the projected payments was discounted using a weighted-average
risk-free rate of 1.3% and 1.4% in 2010 and 2009, respectively. This liability is adjusted for new
claims information in the period such information becomes known to us. Professional malpractice
expense includes the losses resulting from professional liability claims and loss adjustment
expense, as well as paid excess insurance premiums, and is presented within other operating
expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.
54
Our processes for obtaining and analyzing claims and incident data are standardized across all
of our hospitals and have been consistent for many years. We monitor the outcomes of the medical
care services that we provide and for each reported claim, we obtain various information concerning
the facts and circumstances related to that claim. In addition, we routinely monitor current key
statistics and volume indicators in our assessment of utilizing historical trends. The average lag
period between claim occurrence and payment of a final settlement is between four and five years,
although the facts and circumstances of individual claims could result in the timing of such
payments being different from this average. Since claims are paid promptly after settlement with
the claimant is reached, settled claims represent less than 1.0% of the total liability at the end
of any period.
For purposes of estimating our individual claim accruals, we utilize specific claim
information, including the nature of the claim, the expected claim amount, the year in which the
claim occurred and the laws of the jurisdiction in which the claim occurred. Once the case accruals
for known claims are determined, information is stratified by loss layers and retentions, accident
years, reported years, geography, and claims relating to the acquired Triad hospitals versus claims
relating to our other hospitals. Several actuarial methods are used against this data to produce
estimates of ultimate paid losses and reserves for incurred but not reported claims. Each of these
methods uses our company-specific historical claims data and other information. This
company-specific data includes information regarding our business, including historical paid losses
and loss adjustment expenses, historical and current case loss reserves, actual and projected
hospital statistical data, a variety of hospital census information, employed physician
information, professional liability retentions for each policy year, geographic information and
other data.
Based on these analyses we determine our estimate of the professional liability claims. The
determination of managements estimate, including the preparation of the reserve analysis that
supports such estimate, involves subjective judgment of management. Changes in reserving data or
the trends and factors that influence reserving data may signal fundamental shifts in our future
claim development patterns or may simply reflect single-period anomalies. Even if a change reflects
a fundamental shift, the full extent of the change may not become evident until years later.
Moreover, since our methods and models use different types of data and we select our liability from
the results of all of these methods, we typically cannot quantify the precise impact of such
factors on our estimates of the liability. Due to our standardized and consistent processes for
handling claims and the long history and depth of our company-specific data, our methodologies have
produced reliably determinable estimates of ultimate paid losses.
We are primarily self-insured for these claims; however, we obtain excess insurance that
transfers the risk of loss to a third-party insurer for claims in excess of our self-insured
retentions. Our excess insurance is underwritten on a claims-made basis. For claims reported prior
to June 1, 2002, substantially all of our professional and general liability risks were subject to
a $0.5 million per occurrence self-insured retention and for claims reported from June 1, 2002
through June 1, 2003, these self-insured retentions were $2.0 million per occurrence. Substantially
all claims reported after June 1, 2003 and before June 1, 2005 are self-insured up to $4 million
per claim. Substantially all claims reported on or after June 1, 2005 are self-insured up to $5
million per claim. Management, on occasion, has selectively increased the insured risk at certain
hospitals based upon insurance pricing and other factors and may continue that practice in the
future. Excess insurance for all hospitals has been purchased through commercial insurance
companies and generally covers us for liabilities in excess of the self-insured retentions. The
excess coverage consists of multiple layers of insurance, the sum of which totals up to $95 million
per occurrence and in the aggregate for claims reported on or after June 1, 2003 and up to $145
million per occurrence and in the aggregate for claims incurred and reported after January 1, 2008.
For certain policy years, if the first aggregate layer of excess coverage becomes fully utilized,
then the self-insured retention could increase to $10 million per claim for any subsequent claims
in that policy year until our total aggregate coverage is met.
Effective January 1, 2008, the former Triad hospitals are insured on a claims-made basis as
described above and through commercial insurance companies as described above for substantially all
claims occurring on or after January 1, 2002 and reported on or after January 1, 2008.
Substantially all losses for the former Triad hospitals in periods prior to May 1, 1999 were
insured through a wholly-owned insurance subsidiary of HCA Inc., or HCA, Triads owner prior to
that time, and excess loss policies maintained by HCA. HCA has agreed to indemnify the former Triad
hospitals in respect of claims covered by such insurance policies arising prior to May 1, 1999.
From May 1, 1999 through December 31, 2006, the former Triad hospitals obtained insurance coverage
on a claims incurred basis from HCAs wholly-owned insurance subsidiary with excess coverage
obtained from other carriers that is subject to certain deductibles. Effective for claims incurred
after December 31, 2006, Triad began insuring its claims from $1 million to $5 million through its
wholly-owned captive insurance company, replacing the coverage provided by HCA. Substantially all
claims occurring during 2007 were self-insured up to $10 million per claim.
There have been no significant changes in our estimate of the reserve for professional
liability claims during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.
55
Income Taxes
We must make estimates in recording provision for income taxes, including determination of
deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities and any valuation allowances that might be
required against the deferred tax assets. We believe that future income will enable us to realize
certain deferred tax assets, subject to the valuation allowance we have established.
The total amount of unrecognized benefit that would impact the effective tax rate, if
recognized, was approximately $7.7 million as of June 30, 2011. It is our policy to recognize
interest and penalties related to unrecognized benefits in our condensed consolidated statements of
income as income tax expense. A total of approximately $1.5 million of interest and penalties is
included in the amount of liability for uncertain tax positions at June 30, 2011. During the six
months ended June 30, 2011, we increased liabilities by $0.1 million and increased interest and
penalties by approximately $0.2 million.
We believe it is reasonably possible that approximately $2.3 million of our current
unrecognized tax benefit may be recognized within the next 12 months as a result of a lapse of the
statute of limitations and settlements with taxing authorities.
We, or one or more of our subsidiaries, file income tax returns in the United States federal
jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. We have extended the federal statute of limitations
for Triad for the tax periods ended December 31, 1999, December 31, 2000, April 30, 2001, June 30,
2001, December 31, 2001, December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2003. We are currently under
examination by the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, regarding the federal tax return of Triad for
the tax periods ended December 31, 2004, December 31, 2005, December 31, 2006 and July 25, 2007. We
believe the results of this examination will not be material to our consolidated results of
operations or consolidated financial position. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to
state income tax examinations for years prior to 2007 and federal income tax examinations with
respect to Community Health Systems, Inc. federal returns for years prior to 2007. Our federal
income tax returns for the 2007 and 2008 tax years are currently under examination by the IRS. We
believe the results of this examination will not be material to our consolidated results of
operations or consolidated financial position.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards
Update, or ASU, 2010-24, which provides clarification to companies in the healthcare industry on
the accounting for professional liability insurance. This ASU states that receivables related to
insurance recoveries should not be netted against the related claim liability and such claim
liabilities should be determined without considering insurance recoveries. This ASU is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and was adopted by us on January 1, 2011. The
adoption of this ASU increased other current assets by $2.5 million, other assets, net by $41.1
million and long-term liabilities by $43.6 million in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at
June 30, 2011 and no impact to the condensed consolidated statement of income for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011.
In August 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-23, which requires a company in the healthcare
industry to use its direct and indirect costs of providing charity care as the measurement basis
for charity care disclosures. This ASU also requires additional disclosures of the method used to
determine such costs. We adopted this ASU on January 1, 2011. In the ordinary course of business,
we render services to patients who are financially unable to pay for hospital care. Included in the
provision for contractual allowances is the value (at our standard charges) of these services to
patients who are unable to pay that is eliminated from net operating revenues when it is determined
they qualify under our charity care policy. The estimated cost incurred by us to provide these
services to patients who are unable to pay was approximately $28.0 million and $25.3 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $54.1 million and $50.8 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The estimated cost of these charity
care services was determined using a ratio of cost to gross charges and applying that ratio to the
gross charges associated with providing care to charity patients for the period. Gross charges
associated with providing care to charity patients includes only the related charges for those
patients who are financially unable to pay and qualify under our charity care policy and that do
not otherwise qualify for reimbursement from a governmental program.
In
July 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-07, which requires healthcare organizations that perform services for patients for
which the ultimate collection of all or a portion of the amounts billed or billable cannot be
determined at the time services are rendered to present all bad debt expense associated with
patient service revenue as an offset to the patient service revenue line item in the statement of
operations. The ASU also requires qualitative disclosures about our policy for recognizing
revenue and bad debt expense for patient service transactions and quantitative information about
the effects of changes in the assessment of collectibility of patient service revenue. This ASU
is effective for fiscal years beginning after
56
December 15, 2011, and will be adopted by us in the first quarter of 2012. We are currently
assessing the potential impact the adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated results of
operations and consolidated financial position.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the matters discussed in this report include forward-looking statements. Statements
that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions or that
include words such as expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, estimates,
thinks, and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results and
performance to be materially different from any future results or performance expressed or implied
by these forward-looking statements. These factors include the following:
|
|
|
general economic and business conditions, both nationally and in the regions in which
we operate; |
|
|
|
|
implementation and effect of recently-adopted and potential federal and state
healthcare legislation; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with our substantial indebtedness, leverage and debt service
obligations; |
|
|
|
|
demographic changes; |
|
|
|
|
changes in, or the failure to comply with, governmental regulations; |
|
|
|
|
potential adverse impact of known and unknown government investigations, audits, and
Federal and State False Claims Act litigation and other legal proceedings; |
|
|
|
|
our ability, where appropriate, to enter into and maintain managed care provider
arrangements and the terms of these arrangements; |
|
|
|
|
changes in, or the failure to comply with, managed care provider contracts could result
in disputes and changes in reimbursement that could be applied retroactively; |
|
|
|
|
changes in inpatient or outpatient Medicare and Medicaid payment levels; |
|
|
|
|
increases in the amount and risk of collectability of patient accounts receivable; |
|
|
|
|
increases in wages as a result of inflation or competition for highly technical
positions and rising supply costs due to market pressure from pharmaceutical companies and
new product releases; |
|
|
|
|
liabilities and other claims asserted against us, including self-insured malpractice
claims; |
|
|
|
|
competition; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract and retain, without significant employment costs, qualified
personnel, key management, physicians, nurses and other healthcare workers; |
|
|
|
|
trends toward treatment of patients in less acute or specialty healthcare settings,
including ambulatory surgery centers or specialty hospitals; |
|
|
|
|
changes in medical or other technology; |
|
|
|
|
changes in U.S. GAAP; |
|
|
|
|
the availability and terms of capital to fund additional acquisitions or replacement
facilities; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully acquire additional hospitals and complete the sale of
hospitals held for sale; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully integrate any acquired hospitals or to recognize expected
synergies from such acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain adequate levels of general and professional liability insurance;
and |
|
|
|
|
timeliness of reimbursement payments received under government programs. |
57
Although we believe that these statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, we can give
no assurance that our goals will be achieved. Given these uncertainties, prospective investors are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are made as of the date of this filing. We assume no obligation to update or revise them
or provide reasons why actual results may differ.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
We are exposed to interest rate changes, primarily as a result of our Credit Facility which
bears interest based on floating rates. In order to manage the volatility relating to the market
risk, we entered into interest rate swap agreements described under the heading Liquidity and
Capital Resources in Item 2. We do not anticipate any material changes in our primary market risk
exposures in 2011. We utilize risk management procedures and controls in executing derivative
financial instrument transactions. We do not execute transactions or hold derivative financial
instruments for trading purposes. Derivative financial instruments related to interest rate
sensitivity of debt obligations are used with the goal of mitigating a portion of the exposure when
it is cost effective to do so.
A 1% change in interest rates on variable rate debt in excess of that amount covered by
interest rate swaps would have resulted in interest expense fluctuating approximately $1.6 million
and $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and approximately
$3.2 million and $3.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, with the participation of other
members of management, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such
evaluations, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such
date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective (at the reasonable assurance level) to
ensure that the information required to be included in this report has been recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms and
to ensure that the information required to be included in this report was accumulated and
communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended June 30, 2011, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect
our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
From time to time, we receive various inquiries or subpoenas from state regulators, fiscal
intermediaries, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Department of Justice
regarding various Medicare and Medicaid issues. In addition to the subpoenas discussed below, we
are currently responding to subpoenas for matters such as: blood administration practices of a
single physician at an Illinois hospital, DME vendor relationships and patient choice discharge
instructions at our Washington hospitals, and operations of a cardiovascular surgery department at
our Oregon hospital. In addition, we are subject to other claims and lawsuits arising in the
ordinary course of our business. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation that is
not covered by insurance policies or reserved for in our financial statements or which we believe
would have a material adverse impact on us; however, some pending or threatened proceedings against
us may involve potentially substantial amounts as well as the possibility of civil, criminal, or
administrative fines, penalties, or other sanctions, which could be material. Settlements of suits
involving Medicare and Medicaid issues routinely require both monetary payments as well as
corporate integrity agreements. Additionally, qui tam or whistleblower actions initiated under
the civil False Claims Act may be pending but placed under seal by the court to comply with the
False Claims Acts requirements for filing such suits.
Community Health Systems, Inc. Legal Proceedings
On February 10, 2006, we received a letter from the Civil Division of the Department of
Justice requesting documents in an investigation it was conducting involving the Company. The
inquiry related to the way in which different state Medicaid programs apply to the federal
government for matching or supplemental funds that are ultimately used to pay for a small portion
of the services provided to Medicaid and indigent patients. These programs are referred to by
different names, including intergovernmental payments, upper payment limit programs, and
Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments. The February 2006 letter
58
focused on our hospitals in three states: Arkansas, New Mexico, and South Carolina. On August
31, 2006, we received a follow up letter from the Department of Justice requesting additional
documents relating to the programs in New Mexico and the payments to
our three hospitals
in that state. Through the beginning of 2009, we provided the Department of Justice with requested
documents, met with its personnel on numerous occasions, and otherwise cooperated in its
investigation. During the course of the investigation, the Civil Division notified us that it
believed that we and these three New Mexico hospitals caused the State of New Mexico to submit
improper claims for federal funds, in violation of the Federal False Claims Act. At one point, the
Civil Division calculated that the three hospitals received ineligible federal participation
payments from August 2000 to June 2006 of approximately $27.5 million and said that if it proceeded
to trial, it would seek treble damages plus an appropriate penalty for each of the violations of
the Federal False Claims Act. This investigation has culminated in the federal governments
intervention in a qui tam lawsuit styled U.S. ex rel. Baker vs. Community Health Systems, Inc.,
pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico. The federal government
filed its complaint in intervention on June 30, 2009. The relator filed a second amended complaint
on July 1, 2009. Both of these complaints expand the time period during which alleged improper
payments were made. We filed motions to dismiss all of the federal governments and the relators
claims on August 28, 2009. On March 19, 2010, the court granted in part and denied in part our
motion to dismiss as to the relators complaint. On July 7, 2010, the court denied our motion to
dismiss the federal governments complaint in intervention. On July 21, 2010, we filed our answer
and pretrial discovery began. On June 2, 2011, the relator filed a Third Amended Complaint adding
subsidiaries Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation and CHS/Community Health
Systems, Inc. as defendants. On June 6, 2011, the government filed its First Amended Complaint in
intervention adding Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation as a defendant.
Discovery is continuing. The discovery deadline is currently set for September 30, 2011, the
deadline for filing of Motions for Summary Judgment is November 21, 2011 and there is currently no
trial date set. We are vigorously defending this action.
On June 12, 2008, two of our hospitals received letters from the United States Attorneys Office for
the Western District of New York requesting documents in an investigation it was conducting into
billing practices with respect to kyphoplasty procedures performed during the period January 1,
2002 through June 9, 2008. On September 16, 2008, one of our hospitals in South Carolina also
received an inquiry. Kyphoplasty is a surgical spine procedure that returns a compromised vertebrae
(either from trauma or osteoporotic disease process) to its previous height, reducing or
eliminating severe pain. We have been informed that similar investigations have been initiated at
unaffiliated facilities in Alabama, South Carolina, Indiana and other states. We believe that this
investigation is related to a qui tam settlement between the same United States Attorneys office and the
manufacturer and distributor of the Kyphon product, which is used in performing the kyphoplasty
procedure. We are cooperating with the investigation by collecting and producing material
responsive to the requests. We are continuing to evaluate and discuss this matter with the federal
government.
On April 19, 2009, we were served in Roswell, New Mexico with an answer and counterclaim in
the case of Roswell Hospital Corporation d/b/a Eastern New Mexico Medical Center vs. Patrick
Sisneros and Tammie McClain (sued as Jane Doe Sisneros). The case was originally filed as a
collection matter. The counterclaim was filed as a putative class action and alleged theories of
breach of contract, unjust enrichment, misrepresentation, prima facie tort, Fair Trade Practices
Act and violation of the New Mexico RICO statute. On May 7, 2009, the hospital filed a notice of
removal to federal court. On July 27, 2009, the case was remanded to state court for lack of a
federal question. A motion to dismiss and a motion to dismiss misjoined counterclaim plaintiffs
were filed on October 20, 2009. These motions were denied. Extensive discovery has been conducted.
A motion for class certification for all uninsured patients was heard on March 3 through March 5,
2010 and on April 13, 2010, the state district court judge certified the case as a class action.
Discovery is ongoing. A hearing was conducted on March 1, 2011 to assess the sufficiency of the
methodology used to determine class damages. On May 13, 2011, the court ordered plaintiffs to
respond by June 27, 2011 with a definitive statement of how plaintiffs intend to remedy their
failure to present an acceptable methodology. On July 5, 2011, we objected to plaintiffs response
and on July 18, 2011 we filed a motion seeking a status hearing. We are vigorously defending this
action.
On December 7, 2009, we received a document subpoena from the United States Department of Health and
Human Services, Office of the Inspector General, or OIG, requesting documents related to our
hospital in Laredo, Texas. The categories of documents requested included case management, resource
management, admission criteria, patient medical records, coding, billing, compliance, the Joint
Commission accreditation, physician documentation, payments to referral sources, transactions
involving physicians, disproportionate share hospital status, and audits by the hospitals Quality
Improvement organization. On January 22, 2010, we received a request for information or
assistance from the OIGs Office of Investigation requesting patient medical records from Laredo
Medical Center in Laredo, Texas for certain Medicaid patients with an extended length of stay.
Additional requests for records have also been received, including a request containing follow-up
questions received on January 5, 2011. On May 16, 2011, we received a subpoena dated May 10, 2011
from the Houston Office of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, OIG, requesting 71
patient medical records from our hospital in Shelbyville, Tennessee, and directing the return of
the records to the Assistant United States Attorney handling the Laredo investigation. We are unaware of
any connection between these two facilities other than they are both affiliated with us. We are
cooperating fully with these investigations.
59
On September 20, 2010, we received a letter from the United States Department of Justice, Civil
Division, advising us that an investigation is being conducted to determine whether certain
hospitals have improperly submitted claims for payment for implantable cardioverter defibrillators,
or ICD. The period of time covered by the investigation is 2003 to the present. The letter states
that the Department of Justices data indicates that many of our hospitals have claims that need to
be reviewed to determine if Medicare payment was appropriate. We understand that the Department of
Justice has submitted similar requests to many other hospitals and hospital systems across the
country as well as to the ICD manufacturers themselves. We are fully cooperating with the
government in this investigation and are providing requested records and documents. Because we are
in the early stages of this investigation, we are unable to evaluate the outcome of this
investigation.
On November 15, 2010, we were served with substantially identical Civil Investigative Demands
(CIDs) from the Office of Attorney General, State of Texas for all our 18 affiliated Texas
hospitals. The subject of the requests appears to concern emergency department procedures and
billing. We are cooperating fully with these requests and are providing documentation and reports
regarding the Pro-MED System. Because we are in the early stages of this investigation, we are
unable to evaluate the outcome of this investigation.
On April 8, 2011, we received a document subpoena, dated March 31, 2011, from the United States
Department of Health and Human Services, OIG, in connection with an investigation of possible
improper claims submitted to Medicare and Medicaid. The subpoena, issued from the OIGs Chicago,
Illinois office, requested documents from all of our hospitals and appears to concern emergency
department processes and procedures, including our hospitals use of the Pro-MED Clinical
Information System, which is a third-party software system that assists with the management of
patient care and provides operational support and data collection for emergency department
management and has the ability to track discharge, transfer and admission recommendations of
emergency department physicians. The subpoena also requested other information about our
relationships with emergency department physicians, including financial arrangements. The
subpoenas requests were very similar to those contained in the Civil Investigative Demands
received by our Texas hospitals from the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Texas on
November 15, 2010 (described above). We are continuing to cooperate with the government in this
investigation.
On April 11, 2011, Tenet Healthcare Corporation, or Tenet, filed suit against the Company,
Wayne T. Smith and W. Larry Cash in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
The suit alleged we committed violations of certain federal securities laws by making certain
statements in various proxy materials filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, in
connection with our offer to purchase Tenet. Tenet alleged that we engaged in a practice to
under-utilize observation status and over-utilize inpatient admission status and asserts that by
doing so, we created undisclosed financial and legal liability to federal, state and private
payors. The suit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief and Tenets costs. On April 19, 2011, we
filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On April 28, 2011, we responded to the allegations during
our earnings release conference call (see our Form 8-K furnished on April 28, 2011). On May 16,
2011, Tenet filed an amended complaint. On June 29, 2011, we filed a motion to dismiss the amended
complaint. A hearing on our motion to dismiss is expected to occur in September 2011. We will
continue to vigorously defend this suit.
On April 22, 2011, a joint motion was filed by the relator and the United States Department of Justice
in the case styled United States ex rel. and Reuille vs. Community Health Systems Professional
Services Corporation and Lutheran Musculoskeletal Center, LLC d/b/a Lutheran Hospital, in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. The lawsuit
was originally filed under seal on January 7, 2009. The suit is brought under the False Claims Act
and alleges that Lutheran Hospital of Indiana billed the Medicare program for (a) false 23 hour
observation after outpatient surgeries and procedures, and (b) intentional assignment of inpatient
status to one-day stays for cases that do not meet Medicare criteria for inpatient intensity of
service or severity of illness. The relator had worked in the case management department of
Lutheran Hospital of Indiana but was reassigned to another department in the fall of 2006. This
facility was acquired by us as part of the July 25, 2007 merger transaction with Triad Hospitals,
Inc. The complaint also includes allegations of age discrimination in Ms. Reuilles 2006
reassignment and retaliation in connection with her resignation on October 1, 2008. We had
cooperated fully with the government in its investigation of this matter, but had been unaware of
the exact nature of the allegations in the complaint. On December 27, 2010, the government filed a
notice that it declined to intervene in this suit. The motion contained additional information
about how the government intended to proceed with an investigation regarding allegations of
improper billing for inpatient care at other hospitals associated with Community Health Systems,
Inc. . . . asserted in other qui tam complaints in other jurisdictions. The motion stated that the
Department of Justice has consolidated its investigations of the Company and other related
entities and that the Civil Division of the Department of Justice, multiple United States
Attorneys offices, and the Office of Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human
Services, or HHS, are now closely coordinating their investigation of these overlapping
allegations. The Attorney General of Texas has initiated an investigation; the United States
intends to work cooperatively with Texas and any other States investigating these allegations. The
60
motion also stated that the Office of Audit Services for the Office of Investigations for HHS
has been engaged to conduct a national audit of certain of our Medicare claims. The
government confirmed that it considers the allegations made in the complaint styled Tenet
Healthcare Corporation vs. Community Health Systems, Inc., et al. filed in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division on April 11, 2011 to be related
to the allegations in the qui tam and to what the government is now describing as a consolidated
investigation. Because qui tam suits are filed under seal, no one but the relator and the
government knows that the suit has been filed or what allegations are being made by the relator on
behalf of the government. Initially, the government has 60 days to make a determination about
whether to intervene in a case and to act as the plaintiff or to decline to intervene and allow the
relator to act as the plaintiff in the suit, but extensions of time are frequently granted to allow
the government additional time to investigate the allegations. Even if, in the course of an
investigation, the court partially unseals a complaint to allow the government and a defendant to
work to a resolution of the complaints allegations, the defendant is prohibited from revealing to
anyone even that the partial unsealing has occurred. As the investigation proceeds, we may learn of
additional qui tam suits filed against us or our affiliated hospitals or related entities, or that
contact letters, document requests, or medical record requests we have received in the past from
various governmental agencies are generated from qui tam cases filed under seal. The motion filed
on April 22, 2011 concluded by requesting a stay of the litigation in the Reuille case for 180
days, and on April 25, 2011, the court granted the motion. Our management company subsidiary,
Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation, the defendant in the Reuille case,
consented to the request for the stay. We are cooperating fully with the government in its
investigations.
On May 13, 2011, we received a subpoena from the SEC requesting documents related to or
requested in connection with the various inquiries, lawsuits, and investigations regarding,
generally, emergency room admissions or observation practices at our hospitals. The subpoena also
requested documents relied upon by us in responding to the Tenet litigation, as well as
other communications about the Tenet litigation. As with all government investigations, we are
cooperating fully with the SEC.
Three purported class action shareholder federal securities cases have been filed in the
United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee,
namely: Norfolk
County Retirement System v. Community Health Systems, Inc., Wayne T. Smith and W. Larry Cash, filed
May 5, 2011; De Zheng v. Community Health Systems, Inc., Wayne T. Smith and W. Larry Cash, filed
May 12, 2011; and Minneapolis Firefighters Relief Association v. Community Health Systems, Inc.,
Wayne T. Smith, W. Larry Cash and Thomas Mark Buford, filed June 2, 2011. All three seek class
certification on behalf of purchasers of our common stock between July 27, 2006 and April 11, 2011
and allege that misleading statements resulted in artificially inflated prices for our common
stock. Two shareholder derivative actions have also been filed in the
United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Plumbers and
Pipefitters Local Union No. 630 Pension Annuity Trust Fund v. Wayne T. Smith, W. Larry Cash, T.
Mark Buford, John A. Clerico, James S. Ely III, John A. Fry, William Norris Jennings, Julia B.
North and H. Mitchell Watson, Jr., filed May 24, 2011, and Roofers Local No. 149 Pension Fund v.
Wayne T. Smith, W. Larry Cash, John A. Clerico, James S. Ely, III, John A. Fry, William Norris
Jennings, Julia B. North and H. Mitchell Watson, Jr., filed June 21, 2011. These two cases allege
breach of fiduciary duty arising out of allegedly improper inpatient admission practices,
mismanagement, waste and unjust enrichment. We believe all of these matters are without merit and
will vigorously defend them.
On June 2, 2011, an order was entered unsealing a relators qui tam complaint in the matter of
U.S. ex. rel Wood M. Deming, MD, individually and on behalf of Regional Cardiology Consultants, PC
v. Jackson-Madison County General Hospital, an Affiliate of West Tennessee Healthcare, Regional
Hospital of Jackson, a Division of Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation,
James Moss, individually, Timothy Puthoff, individually, Joel Perchik, MD, individually, and Elie
H. Korban, MD, individually. The action is pending in the Western District of Tennessee, Jackson
Division. Regional Hospital of Jackson is an affiliated hospital and Mr. Puthoff is a former chief
executive officer there. The Order recited that the United States had elected to intervene to a
limited degree only concerning the claims against Dr. Korban for false and fraudulent billing for
allegedly unnecessary stent procedures and for causing the submission of false claims by the
hospitals. The United States expressly declined to intervene in all other claims against all other
named defendants. On July 28, 2011, we were served by the relator. We believe the claims against our
hospital are without merit and we will vigorously defend this case.
On June 13, 2011, our hospital in Easton, Pennsylvania received a document subpoena from the
Philadelphia office of the United States Department of Justice. The documents requested included medical
records for certain urological procedures performed by a non-employed physician who is no longer on
the medical staff and other records concerning the hospitals relationship with the physician.
Certain procedures performed by the physician had been previously reviewed and appropriate
repayments had been made. We are cooperating fully with the government in this investigation.
61
Management of Significant Legal Proceedings
In accordance with our governance documents, including our Governance Guidelines and the
charter of the Audit and Compliance Committee, our management of significant legal proceedings is
overseen by the independent members of the Board of Directors and, in particular, the Audit and
Compliance Committee. The Audit and Compliance Committee is charged with oversight of compliance,
regulatory and litigation matters, and enterprise risk management. All significant legal
proceedings and allegations of financial statement fraud, error, or misstatement are promptly
referred to the Audit and Compliance Committee for its oversight and evaluation. Consistent with
New York Stock Exchange and Sarbanes-Oxley independence requirements, the Audit and Compliance
Committee is comprised entirely of individuals who are independent of Company management, and all three
members of the Audit and Compliance Committee are audit committee financial experts as defined in the Exchange Act.
In addition, the Audit and Compliance Committee and the other independent members of the Board
of Directors oversee the functions of the voluntary compliance program, including its auditing and
monitoring functions and confidential disclosure program. In recent years, the voluntary
compliance program has addressed the potential for a variety of billing errors that might be the
subject of audits and payment denials by the CMS Recovery Audit Contractors permanent project,
including MS-DRG coding, outpatient hospital and physician coding and billing, and medical
necessity for services (including a focus on hospital stays of very short duration). Efforts by
management, through the voluntary compliance program, to identify and limit risk from these
government audits included significant policy and guidance revisions, training and education, and
auditing. With respect to Medicare inpatient admissions, improvements in case management,
including updating of inpatient medical necessity criteria, heightened focus on correct use of
observation status, and new policies requiring unambiguous signed physician orders prior to
billing, were all adopted in 2009 and 2010. These activities were communicated to and discussed
with the Audit and Compliance Committee.
With respect to the various assertions of third parties about the Audit and Compliance
Committees oversight:
|
|
|
The September 2010 allegation made by CtW Investment Group (that a high percentage of
our hospitals had a high percentage of Medicare short-stay inpatient admissions, which
could signal billing improprieties) was promptly referred to the Audit and Compliance
Committee and an investigation was authorized and initiated with outside counsel and
consultants in December 2010; |
|
|
|
|
Prior to the receipt of the civil investigative demands in Texas in November 2010, no
concerns had been raised that the Pro-MED emergency department management system
inappropriately caused physicians or hospitals to order tests or admit patients, and we
continue to dispute that it does so; and |
|
|
|
|
The purported observation rate metric, which served as a basis for allegations
contained in Tenets lawsuit, is not generally accepted in the industry and we continue to
dispute the validity of the metric in the manner used by Tenet or that the metric is a
meaningful indicator of incorrect billing practices. |
Since the filing of the Tenet lawsuit on April 11, 2011, our Audit and Compliance Committee
and/or Board of Directors has met ten (10) times to review the status of the lawsuits and
investigations relating to allegations of improper billing for inpatient care at our hospitals and
to oversee management in connection with our investigation and defense of these matters. At many
of those meetings, the independent members of the Board of Directors have met in separate session,
first with outside counsel handling the investigations and lawsuits, and then alone, to discuss
their duties and oversight of these matters. At this time, the independent members of the Board of
Directors have determined that (a) the Audit and Compliance
Committee is the correct and most capable group of directors to oversee these matters and, given
the independence and authority of the Audit and Compliance Committee, there is no need to form a
further special committee to oversee these matters, and (b) outside counsel is handling the
investigation and defense of these matters in the best interests of us and our stockholders and
there is no need to engage separate counsel in connection with the investigation of these matters.
We intend to provide additional updates about these matters as we are able to do so (taking
into account any potential impact on these matters) through appropriate, widely-disseminated means.
Triad Hospitals, Inc. Legal Proceedings
In a case styled U.S. ex rel. Bartlett vs. Quorum Health Resources, Inc., et al., pending in
the Western District of Pennsylvania, Johnstown Division, the relator alleges in his second amended
complaint, filed in January 2006 (the first amended complaint having been dismissed), that QHR
conspired with an unaffiliated hospital to pay illegal remuneration in violation of the federal
anti-kickback statute and the Stark Law, thus causing false claims to be filed. A renewed motion to
dismiss was filed in March 2006 asserting that the second amended complaint did not cure the
defects contained in the first amended complaint. In September 2006, the hospital and one of the
other defendants affiliated with the hospital filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the federal
bankruptcy code, which imposed an automatic stay on proceedings in the case. Relators entered into
a settlement agreement with the hospital, subject to confirmation of the hospitals reorganization
plan. The District Court conducted a status conference on January 30, 2009 and later convened
another conference on March 30, 2009 and heard arguments on whether to proceed with a motion to
dismiss, but did not make a ruling. The government and relator have reached a settlement with the
hospital. On March 22, 2011, the court denied all other defendants motions to dismiss. Initial
prediscovery proceedings in Federal Court are beginning. We believe this case is without merit and
will continue to vigorously defend it.
62
There have been no material changes with regard to risk factors previously disclosed in our
most recent annual report on Form 10-K.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
The following table contains information about our purchases of common stock during the three
months ended June 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
|
Shares That May Yet Be |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Publicly Announced |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Plans(a) |
|
|
Plans or Programs(a) |
|
April 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,548,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2011 |
|
|
1,516,400 |
|
|
|
28.30 |
|
|
|
1,516,400 |
|
|
|
2,032,328 |
|
|
June 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
247,166 |
|
|
|
28.40 |
|
|
|
247,166 |
|
|
|
1,785,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,763,566 |
|
|
$ |
28.31 |
|
|
|
1,763,566 |
|
|
|
1,785,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
On September 15, 2010, we commenced a new open market repurchase
program for up to 4,000,000 shares of our common stock, not to
exceed $100 million in repurchases. This program will conclude at
the earliest of three years from the commencement date, when the
maximum number of shares has been repurchased or when the maximum
dollar amount has been expended. During both the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011, we repurchased and retired 1,763,566
shares at a weighted-average price of $28.31 per share. The
cumulative number of shares that have been repurchased and retired
under this program through June 30, 2011 are 2,214,838 shares at a
weighted-average price of $28.82. |
We have not paid any cash dividends since our inception, and do not anticipate the
payment of cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Our Credit Facility limits our ability to pay
dividends and/or repurchase stock to an amount not to exceed $50 million in the aggregate after
November 5, 2010, the date of our amendment and restatement of our Credit Facility. In addition,
our Credit Facility allows us to repurchase stock in an amount not to exceed the aggregate amount
of proceeds from the exercise of stock options. The indenture governing our Notes also limits our
ability to pay dividends and/or repurchase stock. As of June 30, 2011, under the most restrictive
test under these agreements, we have approximately $65.8 million remaining available with which to
pay permitted dividends and/or make stock and Note repurchases.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
(Removed and Reserved) |
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
None
63
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
4.1
|
|
Tenth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.s 8 7/8% Senior Notes
due 2015, dated as of June 30, 2011, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the
guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association |
|
12
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
64
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Wayne T. Smith
|
|
|
|
Wayne T. Smith |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ W. Larry Cash
|
|
|
|
W. Larry Cash |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Director
(principal financial officer) |
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ T. Mark Buford
|
|
|
|
T. Mark Buford |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(principal accounting officer) |
|
|
Date: July 29, 2011
65
Index to Exhibits
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
4.1
|
|
Tenth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.s 8 7/8% Senior Notes
due 2015, dated as of June 30, 2011, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the
guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association |
|
12
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
66
exv4w1
Exhibit 4.1
TENTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE (this Supplemental Indenture), dated as of June 30, 2011, among
CHS/COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the Issuer), each of the parties
identified as a New Subsidiary Guarantor on the signature pages hereto (each, a New Subsidiary
Guarantor and collectively, the New Subsidiary Guarantors) and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Trustee under the Indenture (the Trustee).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS the Issuer has heretofore executed and delivered to the Trustee an Indenture (the
Indenture), dated as of July 25, 2007, providing for the issuance of the
87/8% Senior Notes due 2015 (the Securities);
WHEREAS, each of the undersigned New Subsidiary Guarantors has deemed it advisable and in its
best interest to execute and deliver this Supplemental Indenture, and to become a New Subsidiary
Guarantor under the Indenture; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9.01(4) of the Indenture, the Trustee, the Issuer and the New
Subsidiary Guarantors are authorized to execute and deliver this Supplemental Indenture.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for good and valuable consideration, the
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Issuer, the New Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
mutually covenant and agree for the equal and ratable benefit of the Holders of the Securities as
follows:
SECTION 1. Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have
the meanings assigned to them in the Indenture.
SECTION 2. Guaranties. Each New Subsidiary Guarantor hereby agrees to guarantee the
Issuers obligations under the Securities on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in
Article 10 of the Indenture and to be bound by all other applicable provisions of the Indenture as
a Subsidiary Guarantor.
SECTION 3. Ratification of Indenture; Supplemental Indentures Part of Indenture.
Except as expressly amended hereby, the Indenture is in all respects ratified and confirmed and all
the terms, conditions and provisions thereof shall remain in full force and effect. This
Supplemental Indenture shall form a part of the Indenture for all purposes, shall inure to the
benefit of the Trustee and every Holder of Securities heretofore or hereafter authenticated and the
Issuer, the Trustee and every Holder of Securities heretofore or hereafter authenticated and
delivered shall be bound hereby.
SECTION 4. Governing Law. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND
CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
SECTION 5. Trustee Makes No Representation. The Trustee makes no representation as to
the validity or sufficiency of this Supplemental Indenture.
SECTION 6. Counterparts. The parties may sign any number of copies of this
Supplemental Indenture. Each signed copy shall be an original, but all of them together represent
the same agreement.
SECTION 7. Effect of Headings. The Section headings herein are for convenience only
and shall not effect the construction of this Supplemental Indenture.
[Signature page follows]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Supplemental
Indenture to be duly executed as of this 30th day of
June, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
a Delaware corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Rachel A. Seifert |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rachel A. Seifert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Secretary & General Counsel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bullhead City Hospital Corporation, |
|
|
|
|
an Arizona corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Rachel A. Seifert |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rachel A. Seifert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bullhead City Hospital Corporation, |
|
|
|
|
a Delaware corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Rachel A. Seifert |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rachel A. Seifert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nanticoke Hospital Company, LLC, |
|
|
|
|
a Delaware limited liability company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Rachel A. Seifert |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rachel A. Seifert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scranton Holdings, LLC, |
|
|
|
|
a Delaware limited liability company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Rachel A. Seifert |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rachel A. Seifert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scranton Hospital Company, LLC, |
|
|
|
|
a Delaware limited liability company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Rachel A. Seifert |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rachel A. Seifert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tunkhannock Hospital Company, LLC, |
|
|
|
|
a Delaware limited liability company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Rachel A. Seifert |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rachel A. Seifert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Bank National Association, |
|
|
|
|
as Trustee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Wally Jones |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wally Jones
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President |
|
|
exv12
Exhibit 12
STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
273,392 |
|
Income from equity investees |
|
|
(30,151 |
) |
Distributed income from equity investees |
|
|
22,606 |
|
Interest and amortization of deferred finance costs |
|
|
326,448 |
|
Amortization of capitalized interest |
|
|
2,743 |
|
Implicit rental interest expense |
|
|
31,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Earnings |
|
$ |
626,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Charges |
|
|
|
|
Interest and amortization of deferred finance costs |
|
$ |
326,448 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
9,830 |
|
Implicit rental interest expense |
|
|
31,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed charges |
|
$ |
367,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |
|
|
1.70 |
x |
|
|
|
|
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
I, Wayne T. Smith, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Community Health Systems, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors:
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: July 29, 2011
|
|
/s/ Wayne T. Smith |
|
|
|
|
Wayne T. Smith
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
I, W. Larry Cash, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Community Health Systems, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors:
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: July 29, 2011
|
|
/s/ W. Larry Cash |
|
|
|
|
W. Larry Cash
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Director |
|
|
exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Community Health Systems, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wayne T. Smith, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Wayne T. Smith |
|
|
|
|
Wayne T. Smith
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
July 29, 2011
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Community Health Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Community Health Systems, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exv32w2
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Community Health Systems, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Larry Cash, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ W. Larry Cash |
|
|
|
|
W. Larry Cash
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director |
|
|
July 29, 2011
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Community Health Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Community Health Systems, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.