SEC Filing | Community Health Systems, Inc.

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Download XBRL

Form 10-K

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

☑	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the year ended December 31, 2016

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-15925

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		13-3893191
(State of incorporation)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

4000 Meridian Boulevard Franklin, Tennessee		37067 (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(615) 465-7000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of Each Class		Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $.01 par value		New York Stock Exchange
Stock Purchase Rights		New York Stock Exchange
Contingent Value Rights		The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES ☑ NO ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. YES ☐ NO ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ☑ NO ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment to the Form 10-K. ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer ☑	Accelerated filer ☐	Non-accelerated filer ☐	Smaller reporting company ☐
	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES ☐ NO ☑

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $1,321,763,644. Market value is determined by reference to the closing price on June 30, 2016 of the Registrant’s Common Stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange. The Registrant does not (and did not at June 30, 2016) have any non-voting common stock outstanding. As of February 15, 2017, there were 113,849,339 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain information required for Part III of this annual report is incorporated by reference to portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2017 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the Registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

Year ended December 31, 2016


		Page
	PART I
Item 1.	Business		1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		30
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments		44
Item 2.	Properties		44
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings		49
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		55

	PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		56
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data		59
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		60
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		95
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		96
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		172
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures		172
Item 9B.	Other Information		172

	PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance		175
Item 11.	Executive Compensation		177
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		177
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence		177
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services		177

	PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules		178

Item 1. Business of Community Health Systems, Inc.

Overview of Our Company

We are one of the largest publicly-traded hospital companies in the United States and a leading operator of general acute care hospitals and outpatient facilities in communities across the country. We were originally founded in 1986 and were reincorporated in 1996 as a Delaware corporation. We provide healthcare services through the hospitals that we own and operate and affiliated businesses in non-urban and selected urban markets throughout the United States. As of December 31, 2016, we owned or leased 155 hospitals included in continuing operations, with an aggregate of 26,222 licensed beds, comprised of 152 general acute care hospitals and three stand-alone rehabilitation or psychiatric hospitals. These hospitals are geographically diversified across 21 states, with the majority of our hospitals located in regional networks or in close geographic proximity to one or more of our other hospitals. We also owned or leased three hospitals included in discontinued operations at December 31, 2016. We generate revenues by providing a broad range of general and specialized hospital healthcare services and outpatient services to patients in the communities in which we are located. Services provided through our hospitals and affiliated businesses include general acute care, emergency room, general and specialty surgery, critical care, internal medicine, obstetrics, diagnostic, psychiatric and rehabilitation services. We also provide additional outpatient services at urgent care centers, occupational medicine clinics, imaging centers, cancer centers, ambulatory surgery centers and home health and hospice agencies. An integral part of providing these services is our network of affiliated physicians at our hospitals and affiliated businesses. As of December 31, 2016, we employed approximately 3,000 physicians and an additional 1,000 licensed healthcare practitioners. Through our management and operation of these businesses, we provide standardization and centralization of operations across key business areas; strategic assistance to expand and improve services and facilities; implementation of patient safety and quality of care improvement programs and assistance in the recruitment of additional physicians and licensed healthcare practitioners to the markets in which our hospitals are located. In a number of our markets, we have partnered with local physicians or not-for-profit providers, or both, in the ownership of our facilities. The financial information for our reportable operating segments is presented in Note 15 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or Form 10-K.

Our business strategy has historically included growth by acquisition. In this regard, we have generally targeted hospitals in growing, non-urban and selected urban healthcare markets for acquisition because of their favorable demographic and economic trends and competitive conditions. Because non-urban and suburban service areas have smaller populations, there are generally fewer hospitals and other healthcare service providers in these communities and generally a lower level of managed care presence in these markets. We believe that communities with smaller populations generally view the local hospital as an integral part of the community and support less direct competition for hospital-based services. Since 2007, we have substantially increased the size of our business and the number of hospitals we operate through the acquisitions of hospitals from Triad Hospitals, Inc., or Triad, and Health Management Associates, Inc., or HMA. Our growth strategy has also included developing or acquiring select physician practices, physician-owned ancillary service providers and other outpatient capabilities in markets where we already had a hospital presence. More recently, our efforts have focused on creating regional networks in select urban markets. We believe opportunities exist for skilled, disciplined operators to create networks between urban and non-urban hospitals while improving physician alignment in both markets and making the hospitals more attractive to managed care.

We have been implementing a portfolio rationalization and deleveraging strategy by divesting hospitals and non-hospital businesses that are attractive to strategic and other buyers. Generally, these businesses are not in one of our strategically beneficial service areas, are less complementary to our business strategy and/or have lower operating margins. More recently, in connection with our announced divestiture initiative, strategic buyers have made offers to buy certain of our assets. Through consideration of these offers we have divested or may divest hospitals and non-hospital businesses when we find such offers to be attractive and in line with our operating strategy. In addition, we expect to return to our acquisition strategy when our portfolio rationalization and deleveraging strategy has been sufficiently completed.

On January 27, 2014, we completed the acquisition of HMA for approximately $7.3 billion, including the assumption of approximately $3.8 billion of indebtedness, which is referred to in this report as the HMA merger. Additional details regarding the HMA merger are set forth in the Executive Overview section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

On April 29, 2016, we completed a spin-off of 38 hospitals and Quorum Health Resources, LLC, or QHR (our subsidiary through which we provided management advisory and consulting services to non-affiliated general acute care hospitals located throughout the United States), into Quorum Health Corporation, or QHC, and distributed, on a pro rata basis, all of the shares of QHC common stock to our stockholders of record as of April 22, 2016. These stockholders received one share of QHC common stock for every four shares of our common stock held as of the record date plus cash in lieu of any fractional shares. The transaction was structured to be generally tax free to us and our stockholders. In recognition of the spin-off, we recorded a non-cash dividend of approximately $713 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, representing the net assets of QHC distributed to our stockholders. Following the spin-off, QHC became an independent public company with its common stock listed for trading under the symbol “QHC” on the New York Stock Exchange. Financial and statistical data reported in this Form 10-K include QHC operating results through the spin-off date. Same-store operating results and statistical data exclude information for the hospitals divested in the spin-off of QHC in the years ended December 31, 2016, and for the comparable periods in 2015 and 2014.

In connection with the spin-off, we entered into a separation and distribution agreement as well as certain ancillary agreements with QHC on April 29, 2016. These agreements allocate between QHC and us the various assets, employees, liabilities and obligations (including investments, property and employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) that comprise the separate companies and govern certain relationships between, and activities of, QHC and us for a period of time after the spin-off.

Throughout this Form 10-K, we refer to Community Health Systems, Inc., or the Parent Company, and its consolidated subsidiaries in a simplified manner and on a collective basis, using words like “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company.” This drafting style is suggested by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and is not meant to indicate that the publicly-traded Parent Company or any particular subsidiary of the Parent Company owns or operates any asset, business or property. The hospitals, operations and businesses described in this filing are owned and operated, and management services provided, by distinct and indirect subsidiaries of Community Health Systems, Inc.

In addition, our Board of Directors adopted a Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement on October 3, 2016. The Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement will not prevent our takeover, but may cause substantial dilution to a person or group that acquires 15% or more of our common stock, which may inhibit or render more difficult a merger, tender offer or other business combination involving us that is not supported by our Board of Directors. The Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement will expire on April 1, 2017.

Available Information

Our website address is www.chs.net and the investor relations section of our website is located at www.chs.net/investor-relations. We make available free of charge, through the investor relations section of our website, annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K as well as amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practical after they are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Our filings are also available to the public at the website maintained by the SEC, www.sec.gov.

We also make available free of charge, through the investor relations section of our website, our By-laws, our Governance Guidelines, our Code of Conduct and the charters of our Audit and Compliance Committee, Compensation Committee and Governance and Nominating Committee.

We have included the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer certifications regarding the public disclosure required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2 to this Form 10-K.

Our Business Strategy

Our objective is to increase shareholder value by providing high-quality patient care using cost effective and efficient operations. The key elements of our business strategy to achieve this objective are to:

•

expand and strengthen regional networks,

•

increase revenue at our facilities,

•

increase productivity and operating efficiency,

•

improve patient safety and quality of care,

•

rationalize our portfolio through divestitures of hospitals and non-hospital businesses, and

•

grow through selective acquisitions.

Expand and Strengthen Regional Networks

We believe opportunities exist in select urban markets to create networks between urban hospitals and non-urban hospitals in order to expand the breadth of services offerings in the non-urban hospitals while improving alignment in these markets and making them more attractive to managed care.

Currently, 74 of our hospitals operate in 11 unique regional networks, which are comprised of one or more larger hospitals with smaller hospitals located in nearby communities. Within each regional network, we leverage the network’s brand and local scale to expand our continuum of care, enhance access to our facilities, provide a more integrated service offering and reduce costs through increased operating efficiencies. Additionally, 34 of our hospitals operate in close geographic proximity to one or more of our other hospitals in 13 geographic areas. For these hospitals, we seek to develop or expand similar specialty services and outpatient services as our regional networks to yield high patient and physician satisfaction, improve revenue and gain operational efficiencies. As of December 31, 2016, we estimate that approximately 70% of our facilities are located in regional networks or are in close proximity to another CHS hospital.

Increase Revenue at Our Facilities

Overview. We are implementing a strategy to expand and rationalize service lines. We believe this focused, service line strategy facilitates better capital allocation, and drives volume, acuity and rate growth in desirable areas. In addition, we are expanding the medical services we provide through the recruitment of additional primary care physicians and specialists. We also work with local hospital boards, management teams and medical staffs to determine the number and type of additional physician specialties needed. In recent years, we have built through acquisitions and consolidation several major networks of affiliated hospitals in key states in which we operate. We believe these hospital networks allow us to provide more integrated services and maximize the usage of our strong physician base.

Our initiatives to increase revenue include:

•

recruiting and/or employing additional primary care physicians and specialists,

•

expanding patient access points and the breadth of services offered at our hospitals, our affiliated businesses and in the communities in which we operate, through targeted capital expenditures and physician alignment to support the addition of more convenient or complex services, including orthopedics, cardiovascular services, urology and urgent care,

•

providing the capital to invest in technology and the physical plant at our facilities, particularly in our emergency rooms, surgery departments, critical care departments and in diagnostic services, and

•

executing select managed care contracts through a centrally managed review process.

Physician Recruiting. The primary method of adding or expanding medical services is the recruitment of new primary care physicians and specialists into the community. A core group of primary care physicians is necessary as an initial contact point for all local healthcare. The addition of specialists who offer services, including general surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, cardiovascular services, orthopedics and urology, completes the full range of medical and surgical services required to meet a community’s core healthcare needs. At the time we acquire a hospital, and from time to time thereafter, we identify the healthcare needs of the community in which such hospital is located by analyzing demographic data and patient referral trends. As a result of this analysis, we are able to determine what we believe to be the optimum mix of primary care physicians and specialists. We employ recruiters at the corporate level to support the local hospital managers in their recruitment efforts. In some markets, we employ physicians, often acquiring their practice at the onset of the arrangement. We have increased the number of physicians affiliated with us through our recruiting and employment efforts. The percentage of recruited or employed physicians commencing practice with us that were specialists was over 70% in 2016. However, most of the physicians in our communities remain in private practice and are not our employees. We believe we have been successful in recruiting and employing physicians because of the practice opportunities afforded physicians in our markets, as well as lower managed care penetration as compared to larger urban areas.

Expansion of Services and Capital Investment. In an effort to better meet the healthcare needs of the communities we serve and to capture a greater portion of the healthcare spending in our markets, we have added a broad range of services to our facilities and, in certain markets, acquired physician practices to broaden our service offerings. These services range from various types of diagnostic equipment capabilities to additional and renovated emergency rooms, surgical and critical care suites and specialty services. We have concentrated our focus on expanding our service lines to those service offerings that we believe have the greatest growth potential, including orthopedics, neuroscience, cardiovascular care, women’s health and cancer care. We have been able to expand these service lines through providing additional access points separate from the traditional hospital service location, the maximization of physician practice utilization, creation of free-standing emergency departments, joint venture partnerships with third-party urgent care, diagnostic, imaging and other retail service locations, expansion of outside diagnostic and surgery center locations, and advancing tele-health strategies. Focused initiatives in these areas are intended to provide quicker access to care in a lower cost setting, increase the number of patient transfer centers to better coordinate care, and implement digital health solutions to improve patient engagement and satisfaction. Some of these initiatives include:

•

expanding our orthopedic program and creating a more standardized process of orthopedic care;

•

expanding and renovating existing emergency rooms to improve service and reduce waiting times;

•

increasing the number of patient transfer centers to better coordinate care among our physicians, hospitals and outpatient centers. Transfer centers enable patients to be transported to facilities that provide the services they need in our hospitals; and

•

leveraging digital tools to create virtual access points and improve our patient and physician experiences. These digital solutions use clinical protocols and analytics to drive patient outreach for scheduling appointments, assist with referral management to keep patients in-network when possible and provide post care follow-up, including treatment plans, health education, prescription reminders and prevention screening. We also have introduced a tool that enables patients to compare pricing for select outpatient services among our facilities and those of competitors in our markets.

In addition to these initiatives, we believe our investment in expanding our footprint through free-standing emergency departments, ambulatory surgery centers and urgent care centers will generate increased revenues and earnings from businesses with higher growth and operating margins. We believe that appropriate capital investments in our outpatient facilities combined with the development of our service capabilities will increase patient retention while providing an attractive return on investment.

We spent approximately $192 million on 93 major construction projects that were completed in 2016. These projects included new emergency rooms, cardiac catheterization laboratories, hospital additions and surgical suites as well as improvements to various diagnostic and other inpatient and outpatient service capabilities. We also employ a small group of clinical consultants at our corporate headquarters to assist the hospitals in their development of surgery, emergency, critical care, cardiovascular and hospitalist services. In addition to spending capital on expanding services at our existing hospitals, we also build replacement facilities in certain markets to better meet the healthcare needs in those communities. In 2015, we completed Grandview Medical Center, a replacement hospital in Birmingham, Alabama. Transfer of all operations to this new facility was completed on October 10, 2015. As part of an acquisition in 2012, we agreed to build a replacement hospital in York, Pennsylvania by July 2017. The total cost of the replacement hospital in York, Pennsylvania is estimated to be $125 million. In 2016, we spent $12 million on the construction project related to the York replacement hospital. In 2015, we spent $123 million on construction projects related to the Birmingham and York replacement hospitals.

Managed Care Strategy. Managed care continues to grow in the United States as health plans expand service areas and membership in an attempt to control rising medical costs. As we service primarily non-urban markets, we do not have significant relationships with individual managed care organizations, including Medicare Advantage. We have responded to the growth in managed care with a proactive and carefully considered strategy developed specifically for each of our facilities. Our experienced corporate managed care department reviews and approves all managed care contracts, which are organized and monitored using a central database. The primary mission of this department is to select and evaluate appropriate managed care opportunities, manage existing reimbursement arrangements and negotiate increases in reimbursement. Generally, we do not intend to enter into capitated or risk sharing contracts. However, some purchased hospitals have risk sharing contracts at the time we acquire them. We seek to discontinue these contracts to eliminate risk retention related to payment for patient care. We do not believe that we have, at the present time, any risk sharing contracts that would have a material impact on our results of operations.

Increase Productivity and Operating Efficiency

Overview. We focus on improving operating efficiency to enhance our operating margins. We seek to implement cost containment programs and adhere to operating philosophies that focus on standardizing and centralizing our methods of operation and management, including:

•

monitoring and enhancing productivity of our human resources,

•

capitalizing on purchasing efficiencies through the use of company-wide standardized purchasing contracts and terminating or renegotiating specified vendor contracts,

•

installing standardized management information systems, resulting in more streamlined clinical operations and more efficient billing and collection procedures, and

•

improving patient safety and optimizing resource allocation through our case and resource management program, which assists in improving clinical care and containing costs.

In addition, each of our hospital management teams is supported by our centralized operational, reimbursement, regulatory and compliance expertise, as well as by our senior management team that has substantial industry knowledge and a proven track record of operations success in the hospital industry. Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer each have over 30 years of experience in the healthcare industry and have worked together since 1973. Our five division presidents have each worked at the Company for many years and average 21 years of experience in hospital and division executive roles. Additionally, we have recently made several key external hires to further strengthen our senior management team.

Standardization and Centralization. Our standardization and centralization initiatives encompass nearly every aspect of our business, from developing standard policies and procedures with respect to patient accounting and physician practice management to implementing standard processes to initiate, evaluate and complete construction projects. Our standardization and centralization initiatives are a key element in improving our operating results.

•

Billing and Collections. We have adopted standard policies and procedures with respect to billing and collections. We have also automated and standardized various components of the collection cycle, including statement and collection letters and the movement of accounts through the collection cycle. Upon completion of an acquisition, our management information systems team converts the hospital’s existing information system to our standardized system. This enables us to quickly implement our business controls and cost containment initiatives. Additionally, we have consolidated local billing and collection functions into six centralized business offices and have completed the transition of our hospitals to this new system and have started to benefit from lower patient denials, underpayment recoveries and reduced operating expenses.

•

Physician Support. We support our newly recruited physicians to enhance their transition into our communities. All newly recruited physicians who enter into contracts with us participate in an online orientation that covers issues related to starting up or joining a practice. For our employed physicians, we are leveraging software solutions that monitor physician practice performance. We have also implemented programs to improve physician workflow, reduce physician turnover, optimize staffing at physician clinics and standardize onboarding processes.

•

Procurement and Materials Management. We have standardized and centralized our operations with respect to medical supplies, equipment and pharmaceuticals used in our hospitals. We have a participation agreement with HealthTrust Purchasing Group, L.P., or HealthTrust, a group purchasing organization, or GPO. HealthTrust contracts with certain vendors who supply a substantial portion of our medical supplies, equipment and pharmaceuticals. The current term of our agreement with HealthTrust expires in January 2018, with automatic renewal terms of one year unless either party terminates by giving notice of non-renewal.

•

Facilities Management. We have standardized interiors, lighting and furniture programs. We have also implemented a standard process to initiate, evaluate and complete construction projects. Our corporate staff monitors all construction projects, and reviews and pays all construction project invoices. Our initiatives in this area have reduced our construction costs and shortened our project completion times while maintaining the same high level of quality.

•

Other Initiatives. We have also improved efficiency and productivity by implementing standard programs with respect to ancillary services in various areas, including emergency rooms, pharmacy, laboratory, imaging, home care, skilled nursing, centralized outpatient scheduling and health information management. Moreover, we have implemented initiatives intended to realize employee benefit savings on medical benefits, prescription services and high medical claims and to reduce

overtime and use of temporary staffing to align with patient admissions. We work to identify and communicate best practices and monitor these improvements throughout the Company.

•

Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting. We have centralized many of our significant internal controls over financial reporting and standardized those other controls that are performed at our hospital locations. We continuously monitor compliance with and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting.

Case and Resource Management. The primary goal of our case management program is to ensure the delivery of safe, high quality care in an efficient and cost effective manner. The program focuses on:

•

appropriate management of length of stay consistent with national standards and benchmarks,

•

reducing unnecessary utilization,

•

developing and implementing operational best practices,

•

discharge planning, and

•

compliance with all regulatory standards.

Our case management program integrates the functions of utilization review, discharge planning, assessment of medical necessity and resource management. Patients are assessed upon presentation to the hospital and throughout their course of care with ongoing reviews. Industry standard criteria are utilized in patient assessments, and discharge plans are adjusted according to patient needs. Cases are monitored to prevent delays in service or unnecessary utilization of resources. When a patient is ready for discharge, a case manager works with the patient’s attending physician to evaluate and coordinate the patient’s needs for continued care in the post-acute setting. Each hospital has the support of a physician advisor to act as a liaison to the medical staff and assist with all the activities of the program.

Improve Patient Safety and Quality of Care

Each of our hospitals is operated by a corporate board of directors that has established a local board of trustees, which includes members of the hospital’s medical staff. The board of directors delegates certain matters to the board of trustees, including establishing policies concerning the hospital’s medical, professional, and ethical practices, monitoring these practices, and responsibility for ensuring that these practices conform to legally required standards. We maintain quality assurance programs to support and monitor quality of care standards and to meet Medicare and Medicaid accreditation and regulatory requirements. Patient care evaluations and other quality of care assessment activities are reviewed and monitored continuously with comparison to regional and national benchmarks when available.

We maintain an emphasis on patient safety, the provision of quality care and improving clinical outcomes. We understand that high levels of quality are only achieved with a company-wide focus that embraces patient, physician and employee satisfaction and continual, systematic clinical improvements. We believe that a focus on continuous improvement yields the best results for patients, reduces risk and improves revenue through achievement of quality measures. We have developed and implemented programs to support and monitor patient safety and quality of care that include:

•

standardized data and benchmarks to monitor hospital performance and quality improvement efforts;

•

recommended policies and procedures based on the best medical and scientific evidence as well as training on evidence-based tools for improving patient, physician and employee satisfaction;

•

leveraging of technology and sharing of evidence-based clinical best practices;

•

training programs for hospital management and clinical staff regarding regulatory and reporting requirements; and

•

implementation of specific leadership methods and error-prevention tools to create safer care environments for patients and staff.

As a result of these efforts, we have made significant progress in patient safety and clinical quality.

In 2011, we established a component patient safety organization, or PSO, which was listed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality on January 11, 2012. We believe our PSO has assisted, and will continue to assist, us in improving patient safety at our hospitals. The PSO was recertified in 2014 through 2018.

Divestiture and Acquisition Strategy

Divestiture and Acquisition Criteria. Acquisitions have been a core part of our growth strategy historically. We have been implementing a portfolio rationalization and deleveraging strategy by divesting hospitals and non-hospital businesses that are attractive to strategic and other buyers. Generally, these businesses are not in one of our strategically beneficial service areas, are less complementary to our business strategy and/or have lower operating margins. In addition to the spin-off of the 38 facilities to QHC which was completed in April 2016 as noted above, in 2016 we divested two facilities and an 80% ownership interest in our home care division, which, as of December 31, 2016, owned and operated 74 licensed home care agencies and 15 licensed hospice agencies. For additional information regarding potential additional dispositions, see the Executive Overview of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.

Although we are not actively pursuing hospital acquisition opportunities at this time, we have continued to invest capital strategically in selected physician practice and ancillary service locations that will enhance the service lines and patient access points for our existing hospitals. We intend to focus again on hospital acquisitions once our portfolio rationalization has been sufficiently completed, and, at that time return to a disciplined and targeted approach to hospital acquisitions and seek opportunities that are complementary to our existing markets or represent new markets that fit our operating criteria. At that time, we may pursue acquisition candidates that:

•

are located in a market that has a stable or growing population base,

•

are the sole or primary provider of acute care services in the community,

•

are located in an area with the potential for service expansion,

•

are not located in an area that is dependent upon a single employer or industry, and

•

have financial performance that we believe will benefit from our management’s operating skills.

In 2016 we acquired three hospitals located in Fayetteville, Arkansas; La Porte, Indiana and Knox, Indiana. We believe that our access to capital, reputation for providing quality care and ability to recruit physicians makes us an attractive partner for these communities. No hospital acquisitions closed during 2015.

On January 27, 2014, we completed the merger with HMA, which at the time of acquisition owned or leased 71 hospitals. In addition to the HMA hospitals, during 2014 we acquired four other hospitals located in Ocala, Florida; Sharon, Pennsylvania; Natchez, Mississippi; and Gaffney, South Carolina.

Acquisition Efforts. A key part of our strategy has involved establishing a broader presence in our states and markets of operation and expanding and strengthening our regional networks where appropriate. Apart from our

acquisition of Triad hospitals in 2007 and HMA in 2014, most of the hospitals that we have acquired have been municipal or other not-for-profit hospitals. We believe that our access to capital, ability to recruit physicians and reputation for providing quality care make us an attractive partner for these communities. In addition, we have found that communities located in states where we already operate a hospital are more receptive to our acquiring their hospitals, because they are aware of our operating track record with respect to our other hospitals within the state.

At the time we have acquired a hospital, we may commit to an amount of capital expenditures, such as a replacement facility, renovations, or equipment over a specified period of time.

Pursuant to a hospital purchase agreement in effect as of December 31, 2016, we have committed to build replacement facilities in both La Porte, Indiana and Knox, Indiana by March 2021. Construction costs, including equipment costs, for the La Porte and Knox replacement facilities are currently estimated to be approximately $125 million and $15 million, respectively. No costs have been incurred to date on those facilities. Additionally, we are required to build a replacement facility in York, Pennsylvania by July 2017. Estimated construction costs, including equipment costs, are approximately $125 million for this replacement facility, of which approximately $17 million has been incurred to date. Under other purchase agreements in effect as of December 31, 2016, we have committed to spend $464 million, generally over a five to seven year period after acquisition, for costs such as capital improvements, equipment, selected leases and physician recruiting. Through December 31, 2016, we have incurred approximately $209 million related to these commitments.

Industry Overview

According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, national healthcare expenditures in 2016 are projected to have grown 4.8% to approximately $3.4 trillion. In addition, these CMS projections, published 2017, indicate that total U.S. healthcare spending will grow at an average annual rate of 5.9% for 2018 through 2019 and by an average of 5.8% annually from 2020 through 2025. However, these projections do not take into account initiatives, programs or other developments that may result from the 2016 federal elections, including any potential significant modifications to or repeal of the Affordable Care Act. CMS also projected that total U.S. healthcare annual expenditures will exceed $5.5 trillion by 2025, accounting for approximately 19.9% of the total U.S. gross domestic product. CMS expects healthcare spending to be largely influenced by changes in economic growth and population aging, and anticipates faster growth in medical prices.

Hospital services, the market within the healthcare industry in which we primarily operate, is the largest single category of healthcare expenditures. In 2016, hospital care expenditures are projected to have grown 4.9%, amounting to over $1 trillion. CMS estimates that the hospital services category will exceed $1.1 trillion in 2017, and projects growth in this category at an average of 5.5% annually from 2016 through 2025.

U.S. Hospital Industry. The U.S. hospital industry is broadly defined to include acute care, rehabilitation and psychiatric facilities that are either public (government owned and operated), not-for-profit private (religious or secular), or for-profit institutions (investor owned). According to the American Hospital Association, there are 4,800 community hospitals in the U.S. which are not-for-profit owned, investor owned, or state or local government owned. Of these hospitals, nearly 40% are located in non-urban communities. We believe that a majority of these hospitals are owned by not-for-profit or governmental entities. These facilities offer a broad range of healthcare services, including internal medicine, general surgery, cardiology, oncology, orthopedics, OB/GYN and emergency services. In addition, hospitals offer other ancillary services, including psychiatric, diagnostic, rehabilitation, home care and outpatient surgery services.

Urban vs. Non-Urban Hospitals. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 19.3% of the U.S. population lives in communities designated as non-urban. In these non-urban communities, hospitals are typically the primary source of healthcare. In many cases a single hospital is the only provider of general healthcare services in these communities.

Factors Affecting Performance. Among the many factors that can influence a hospital’s financial and operating performance are:

•

facility size and location,

•

facility ownership structure (i.e., tax-exempt or investor owned),

•

a facility’s ability to participate in GPOs, and

•

facility payor mix.

Patients needing the most complex care are more often served by the larger and/or more specialized urban hospitals. We believe opportunities exist in selected urban markets to create networks between urban hospitals and non-urban hospitals in order to expand the breadth of services offered in the non-urban hospitals while improving physician alignment in those markets and making them more attractive to managed care organizations.

Hospital Industry Trends

Demographic Trends. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2015, there were approximately 48 million Americans aged 65 or older in the U.S. comprising approximately 14.9% of the total U.S. population. By the year 2030, the number of Americans aged 65 or older is expected to climb to 72 million, or 19.3% of the total population. Due to the increasing life expectancy of Americans, the number of people aged 85 years and older is also expected to increase from 6 million in 2015 to 9 million by the year 2030. This increase in life expectancy will increase demand for healthcare services and, as importantly, the demand for innovative, more sophisticated means of delivering those services. Hospitals, as the largest category of care in the healthcare market, will be among those impacted most directly by this increase in demand. Based on data compiled for us, the populations of the service areas where our hospitals are located grew 4.6% from 2011 to 2016 and are expected to grow by 4.3% from 2016 to 2021. The number of people aged 65 or older in these service areas grew by 17.7% from 2011 to 2016 and is expected to grow by 17.4% from 2016 to 2021. People aged 65 or older comprised 17.1% of the total population in our service areas in 2016, yet they could comprise 19.3% of the total population in our service areas by 2021.

Consolidation. In addition to our own acquisitions in recent years, consolidation activity in the hospital industry, primarily through mergers and acquisitions involving both for-profit and not-for-profit hospital systems, is continuing. Reasons for this activity include:

•

ample supply of available capital,

•

valuation levels,

•

financial performance issues, including challenges associated with changes in reimbursement and collectability of self-pay revenue,

•

the desire to enhance the local availability of healthcare in the community,

•

the need and ability to recruit primary care physicians and specialists,

•

the need to achieve general economies of scale and to gain access to standardized and centralized functions, including favorable supply agreements and access to malpractice coverage,

•

changes to healthcare payment models that emphasize cost-effective delivery of service and quality of outcomes for the entire episode of care, and

•

regulatory changes.

The payor industry is also consolidating and acquiring health services providers in an effort to offer more expansive, competitive programs.

Trends in Payment for Healthcare Services. As discussed in more detail in the Government Regulation section of this Form 10-K, the impact of healthcare reform legislation, combined with the growing financial and economic pressures on the healthcare industry, has resulted in challenges to traditional reimbursement trends. For example, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, collectively, the Affordable Care Act, has encouraged the adoption of new payment models that emphasize cost effective delivery of care and quality of outcomes. Although health insurance coverage has expanded, patients may face higher deductibles and increased co-payment requirements, which may result in greater write-offs of uncollectible amounts from those patients.

Shift to Outpatient Services. Because of the growing availability of stand-alone outpatient healthcare facilities and the increase in the services that are able to be provided at these locations, many individuals are seeking a broader range of services at outpatient facilities. This trend has contributed to an increase in outpatient services while inhibiting the growth of inpatient admissions.

Selected Operating Data

The following table sets forth operating statistics for our hospitals for each of the years presented, which are included in our continuing operations. Statistics for 2016 include a full year of operations for 152 hospitals and partial periods for three hospitals acquired during the year reflecting the operations of these hospitals following the completion of the acquisition. Statistics for 2015 include a full year of operations for 194 hospitals. Statistics for 2014 include a full year of operations for 127 hospitals and partial periods for 70 hospitals acquired during the year reflecting the operations of these hospitals following the completion of the acquisition. Statistics for hospitals included in discontinued operations are excluded from all periods presented.


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
	(Dollars in millions)
Consolidated Data
Number of hospitals (at end of period)		155			194			197
Licensed beds (at end of period)(1)		26,222			29,853			30,137
Beds in service (at end of period)(2)		23,229			26,312			27,000
Admissions(3)		857,412			940,292			924,557
Adjusted admissions(4)		1,867,348			2,038,103			1,969,770
Patient days(5)		3,832,104			4,175,214			4,091,183
Average length of stay (days)(6)		4.5			4.4			4.4
Occupancy rate (beds in service)(7)		43.1	%		43.3	%		43.8	%
Net operating revenues	$	18,438		$	19,437		$	18,639
Net inpatient revenues as a % of net patient revenues before provision for bad debts		43.2	%		42.8	%		43.9	%
Net outpatient revenues as a % of net patient revenues before provision for bad debts		56.8	%		57.2	%		56.1	%
Net (loss) income attributable to Community Health Systems Inc. stockholders	$	(1,721	)	$	158		$	92
Net (loss) income attributable to Community Health Systems Inc. stockholders as a % of net operating revenues		(9.3	)%		0.8	%		0.5	%
Adjusted EBITDA(8)	$	2,225		$	2,670		$	2,777
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of net operating revenues(8)		12.1	%		13.7	%		14.9	%
Liquidity Data
Net cash flows provided by operating activities	$	1,137		$	921		$	1,615


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
	(Dollars in millions)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities as a % of net operating revenues		6.2	%		4.7	%		8.7	%
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities	$	630		$	(1,051	)	$	(4,351	)
Net cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities	$	(1,713	)	$	(195	)	$	2,872



	Year Ended December 31,						(Decrease)
	2016			2015			Increase
	(Dollars in millions)
Same-Store Data(9)
Admissions(3)		818,559			834,383			(1.9	)%
Adjusted admissions(4)		1,773,093			1,782,134			(0.5	)%
Patient days(5)		3,678,397			3,752,264
Average length of stay (days)(6)		4.5			4.5
Occupancy rate (beds in service)(7)		43.4	%		44.3	%
Net operating revenues	$	17,481		$	17,248			1.4	%
Income from operations	$	1,069		$	1,498			(28.6	)%
Income from operations as a % of net operating revenues		6.1	%		8.7	%
Depreciation and amortization	$	1,045		$	1,030
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	$	(14	)	$	(11	)

(1)	Licensed beds are the number of beds for which the appropriate state agency licenses a facility regardless of whether the beds are actually available for patient use.

(2)	Beds in service are the number of beds that are readily available for patient use.

(3)	Admissions represent the number of patients admitted for inpatient treatment.

(4)	Adjusted admissions is a general measure of combined inpatient and outpatient volume. We computed adjusted admissions by multiplying admissions by gross patient revenues and then dividing that number by gross inpatient revenues.

(5)	Patient days represent the total number of days of care provided to inpatients.

(6)	Average length of stay (days) represents the average number of days inpatients stay in our hospitals.

(7)	We calculated occupancy rate percentages by dividing the average daily number of inpatients by the weighted-average number of beds in service.

(8)

EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure which consists of net (loss) income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA, also a non-GAAP financial measure, is EBITDA adjusted to add back net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and to exclude the effect of discontinued operations, loss from early extinguishment of debt, impairment and (gain) loss on sale of business, gain on sale of investments in unconsolidated affiliates, acquisition and integration expenses from the acquisition of HMA, expense incurred related to the spin-off of QHC, expense incurred related to the sale of a majority ownership interest in our home care division, expense related to government and other legal settlements and related costs, and (income) expense from fair value adjustments on the CVR agreement liability accounted for at fair value related to the HMA legal proceedings, and related legal expenses. We have from time to time sold noncontrolling interests in certain of our subsidiaries or acquired subsidiaries with existing noncontrolling interest ownership positions. We believe that it is useful to present Adjusted EBITDA because it adds back the portion of EBITDA attributable to these third-party interests and clarifies for investors our portion of EBITDA generated by continuing

operations. We now report Adjusted EBITDA as a measure of financial performance rather than as a liquidity measure. Adjusted EBITDA is a key measure used by our management to assess the operating performance of our hospital operations and to make decisions on the allocation of resources. Adjusted EBITDA is also used to evaluate the performance of our executive management team and is one of the primary targets used to determine short-term cash incentive compensation. In addition, our management utilizes Adjusted EBITDA in assessing our consolidated results of operations and operational performance and in comparing our results of operations between periods. We believe it is useful to provide investors and other users of our financial statements this performance measure to align with how management assesses our results of operations. Adjusted EBITDA also is comparable to a similar metric called Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in our senior secured credit facility, which is a key component in the determination of our compliance with some of the covenants under our senior secured credit facility (including our ability to service debt and incur capital expenditures), and is used to determine the interest rate and commitment fee payable under the senior secured credit facility (although Adjusted EBITDA does not include all of the adjustments described in the senior secured credit facility). For further discussion of Consolidated EBITDA and how that measure is utilized in the calculation of our debt covenants, see the Capital Resources section of Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.

Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income, operating income, or any other performance measure calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA are significant components in understanding and evaluating financial performance. We believe such adjustments are appropriate as the magnitude and frequency of such items can vary significantly and are not related to the assessment of normal operating performance. Additionally, our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

The following table reflects the reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA, as defined, to net (loss) income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders as derived directly from our Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (in millions):


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015		2014
Net (loss) income attributable to Community Health
Systems, Inc. stockholders	$	(1,721	)	$	158	$	92
Adjustments:
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes		(104	)		116		82
Depreciation and amortization		1,100			1,172		1,106
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		95			101		111
Loss from discontinued operations		15			36		57
Amortization of software to be abandoned		-			-		75
Interest expense, net		962			973		972
Loss from early extinguishment of debt		30			16		73
Impairment and (gain) loss on sale of businesses, net		1,919			68		41
Gain on sale of investments in unconsolidated affiliates		(94	)		-		-
Expenses related to the acquisition and integration of HMA		-			1		69
Expense from government and other legal settlements and related costs		16			4		105
(Income) expense from fair value adjustments and legal expenses related to cases covered by the CVR		(6	)		8		(6	)
Expenses related to the sale of a majority interest in home care division		1			-		-
Expenses related to the spin-off of Quorum
Health Corporation		12			17		-

Adjusted EBITDA	$	2,225		$	2,670	$	2,777

(9)

Same-store operating results and statistical data exclude information for the hospitals divested in the spin-off of QHC in both the year ended December 31, 2016 and the comparable periods in 2015 and 2014. Same-store operating results include former HMA hospitals for the periods from January 1 through December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, as if such hospitals were owned during each of these comparable periods. For all hospitals owned throughout both periods, the same-store operating results and statistical data reflects the indicated periods. The same-store information does not reflect the application of purchase accounting adjustments as if the HMA merger had been completed on January 1, 2014. Therefore, this information is not intended to present pro forma information prepared under the guidelines of Articles 3-05 and 11 of the SEC. However, management believes the information provides investors with useful information about the hospital admissions, adjusted admissions and net operating revenues had the HMA facilities been owned for the indicated periods. This same-store information for the hospitals acquired in the HMA merger for the period from January 1 through December 31, 2014 is non-GAAP financial information and may not be comparable to the information provided for the comparable 2015 period due to the aforementioned purchase accounting adjustments not having been applied. In addition, same-store comparisons exclude our hospitals that have previously been classified as discontinued operations for accounting purposes.

Sources of Revenue

We receive payment for healthcare services provided by our hospitals from:

•

the federal Medicare program,

•

state Medicaid or similar programs,

•

healthcare insurance carriers, health maintenance organizations or “HMOs,” preferred provider organizations or “PPOs,” and other managed care programs, and

•

patients directly.

The following table presents the approximate percentages of operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before provision for bad debts), by payor source for the periods indicated. The data for the years presented are not strictly comparable due to the effect that hospital acquisitions have had on these statistics.


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Medicare		23.9	%		24.1	%		24.7	%
Medicaid		10.5			11.2			10.8
Managed Care and other third-party payors		53.4			52.4			51.5
Self-pay		12.2			12.3			13.0

Total		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

As reflected above, we receive a substantial portion of our revenues from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Included in Managed Care and other third-party payors is operating revenues from insurance companies with which we have insurance provider contracts, Medicare managed care, insurance companies for which we do not have insurance provider contracts, workers’ compensation carriers and non-patient service revenue, such as rental income and cafeteria sales. The Affordable Care Act has increased the number of insured patients, particularly in states that have expanded Medicaid, which, in turn, has reduced the percentage of our revenues from self-pay patients. However, the outcome of the 2016 federal elections has cast considerable uncertainty on the future of the Affordable Care Act, and it is unclear whether the trend of increased coverage will continue. In addition, several private health insurers have withdrawn, or have announced their intent to withdraw, from the health insurance exchanges established pursuant to the Affordable Care Act, which may

threaten the stability of those marketplaces. Legislation or regulation resulting from the repeal, replacement or amendment of the Affordable Care Act may result in payment reductions under the Medicare or Medicaid programs that could negatively impact our business.

Medicare is a federal program that provides medical insurance benefits to persons age 65 and over, some disabled persons, and persons with end-stage renal disease. Medicaid is a federal-state funded program, administered by the states, that provides medical benefits to individuals who would otherwise be unable to afford healthcare. All of our hospitals are certified as providers of Medicare and Medicaid services. Amounts received under the Medicare and Medicaid programs are generally significantly less than a hospital’s customary charges for the services provided. Further, the Affordable Care Act imposes significant reductions in amounts the government pays healthcare providers and Medicare managed care plans. Since a substantial portion of our revenue comes from patients under Medicare and Medicaid programs, our ability to operate our business successfully in the future will depend in large measure on our ability to adapt to changes in these programs. The trend toward increased enrollment in Medicare managed care may adversely affect our operating revenue.

In addition to government programs, we are paid by private payors, which include insurance companies, HMOs, PPOs, other managed care companies and employers, and by patients directly. Blue Cross payors are included in the “Managed Care and other third-party payors” line in the above table. Patients are generally not responsible for any difference between customary hospital charges and amounts paid for hospital services by Medicare and Medicaid programs, insurance companies, HMOs, PPOs and other managed care companies, but are responsible for services not covered by these programs or plans, as well as for deductibles and co-insurance obligations of their coverage. The amount of these deductibles and co-insurance obligations has increased in recent years. Collection of amounts due from individuals is typically more difficult than collection of amounts due from government or business payors. To further reduce their healthcare costs, an increasing number of insurance companies, HMOs, PPOs and other managed care companies negotiate discounted fee structures or fixed amounts for hospital services performed, rather than paying healthcare providers the amounts billed, and utilize structures such as narrow networks that restrict the providers that enrollees may utilize. We negotiate discounts with managed care companies, which are typically smaller than discounts under government programs. If an increased number of insurance companies, HMOs, PPOs and other managed care companies succeed in negotiating discounted fee structures or fixed amounts or if we are unable to participate in managed care networks serving our markets, our results of operations may be negatively affected. There can be no assurance that we will retain our existing reimbursement arrangements or that these third-party payors will not attempt to further reduce the rates they pay for our services. For more information on the payment programs on which our revenues depend, see “Payment” on page 22.

As of December 31, 2016, Florida, Texas, Pennsylvania and Indiana represented our only areas of significant geographic concentration. Operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before the provision for bad debts), generated by our hospitals in Florida (which became an area of geographic concentration in 2014 as a result of the HMA merger), as a percentage of consolidated operating revenues, were 14.1% in 2016, 13.6% in 2015 and 13.0% in 2014. Operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before the provision for bad debts), generated by our hospitals in Texas, as a percentage of consolidated operating revenues, were 11.4% in 2016, 11.1% in 2015 and 10.9% in 2014. Operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before the provision for bad debts), generated by our hospitals in Pennsylvania, as a percentage of consolidated operating revenues, were 11.2% in 2016, 10.6% in 2015 and 11.1% in 2014. Operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before the provision for bad debts), generated by our hospitals in Indiana, as a percentage of consolidated operating revenues, were 8.6% in 2016, 7.3% in 2015, and 7.6% in 2014.

Hospital revenues depend upon inpatient occupancy levels, the volume of outpatient procedures and the charges or negotiated payment rates for hospital services provided. Charges and payment rates for routine inpatient services vary significantly depending on the type of service performed and the geographic location of

the hospital. In recent years, we have experienced a significant increase in revenue received from outpatient services. We attribute this increase to:

•

advances in technology, which have permitted us to provide more services on an outpatient basis and

•

pressure from Medicare or Medicaid programs, insurance companies and managed care plans to reduce the length and number of inpatient hospital stays and to reduce costs by having services provided on an outpatient rather than on an inpatient basis.

Health care facility operations are also subject to certain seasonal fluctuations, including decreases in patient utilization during holiday periods and increases in colder weather months.

Government Regulation

Overview. The healthcare industry is required to comply with extensive government regulation at the federal, state and local levels. Under these regulations, hospitals must meet requirements to be certified as hospitals and qualified to participate in government programs, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs. These requirements include those relating to the adequacy of medical care, equipment, personnel, operating policies and procedures; billing and coding for services; properly handling overpayments; classifications of levels of care provided; preparing and filing of cost reports; relationships with referral sources and referral recipients; maintenance of adequate records; hospital use; rate-setting; compliance with building codes; environmental protection; and privacy and security. There are also extensive laws and regulations governing a hospital’s participation in these government programs. If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we may be subject to criminal penalties and civil sanctions, our hospitals could lose their licenses and we could lose our ability to participate in these government programs. Further, government regulations may change. If that happens, we may have to make changes in our facilities, equipment, personnel and services so that our hospitals remain certified as hospitals and qualified to participate in these programs. We believe that our hospitals are currently in substantial compliance with current federal, state and local regulations and standards. We cannot be certain that governmental officials responsible for enforcing these laws or whistleblowers will not assert that we are in violation of them or that such statutes or regulations will be interpreted by the courts in a manner consistent with our interpretation.

Hospitals are subject to periodic inspection by federal, state and local authorities to determine their compliance with applicable regulations and requirements necessary for licensing and certification. All of our hospitals are licensed under appropriate state laws and are qualified to participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs. In addition, most of our hospitals are accredited by The Joint Commission. This accreditation indicates that a hospital satisfies the applicable health and administrative standards to participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs.

Healthcare Reform. Over the last decade, the U.S. Congress and certain state legislatures have introduced and passed a large number of proposals and legislation designed to make major changes in the healthcare system, including changes that increased access to health insurance. The most prominent of these recent efforts, the Affordable Care Act, affects how healthcare services are covered, delivered, and reimbursed. However, the future of the Affordable Care Act is uncertain following the 2016 federal elections. The newly elected presidential administration and certain members of Congress have stated their intent to repeal or make significant changes to the Affordable Care Act, its implementation or interpretation but have not yet agreed upon specific proposals for replacement reforms. In addition, a presidential executive order has been signed that directs agencies to minimize “economic and regulatory burdens” of the Affordable Care Act, but it is unclear how this will be implemented. The impact and timing of any potential repeal of or changes to the Affordable Care Act and any alternative provisions on the healthcare industry is unknown.

The Affordable Care Act, as currently structured, mandates that substantially all U.S. citizens maintain health insurance coverage and increases health insurance coverage through a combination of public program expansion

and private sector health insurance reforms. Expansion in public program coverage has been driven primarily by adjusting eligibility requirements for Medicaid coverage. A number of states opted out of the Medicaid expansion provisions, which they may do without losing federal funding. States that have opted out include Florida, Tennessee and Texas, where we operated a significant number of hospitals as of December 31, 2016. Some states that have opted out are evaluating options such as waiver plans to operate an alternative Medicaid expansion plan.

We believe that the Affordable Care Act has had a positive impact on net operating revenues and income from continuing operations as the result of the expansion of private sector and Medicaid coverage that has occurred. However, other provisions of the Affordable Care Act, such as requirements related to employee health insurance coverage, have increased our operating costs. In addition, the Affordable Care Act has made changes to Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement that could adversely impact the reimbursement we receive under these programs. These changes include reductions to the Medicare annual market basket update for federal fiscal years 2010 through 2019, a productivity offset to the Medicare market basket update, and reductions to the Medicare and Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments.

Substantial uncertainty remains regarding the ongoing net effect of the Affordable Care Act due to the results of the 2016 federal elections, the possibility of repeal or significant change to the Affordable Care Act following such elections, and other factors, including clarifications and modifications resulting from executive orders, the rule-making process, the outcome of court challenges, the development of agency guidance, whether and how many states ultimately decide to expand Medicaid coverage, the number of uninsured who elect to purchase health insurance coverage and budgetary issues at federal and state levels.

Fraud and Abuse Laws. Participation in the Medicare program is heavily regulated by federal statute and regulation. If a hospital fails to comply substantially with the requirements for participating in the Medicare program, the hospital’s participation may be terminated and/or civil or criminal penalties may be imposed. Further, a hospital may lose its ability to participate in the Medicare program if it engages in any of the following acts:

•

making claims to Medicare for services not provided or misrepresenting actual services provided in order to obtain higher payments,

•

paying money to induce the referral of patients where services are reimbursable under a federal health program, or

•

paying money to limit or reduce the services provided to Medicare beneficiaries.

Any person or entity that knowingly and willfully defrauds or attempts to defraud a healthcare benefit program, including private healthcare plans, may be subject to fines, imprisonment or both. Additionally, any person or entity that knowingly and willfully falsifies or conceals a material fact or makes any material false or fraudulent statements in connection with the delivery or payment of healthcare services by a healthcare benefit plan is subject to a fine, imprisonment or both.

A section of the Social Security Act, known as the “anti-kickback statute” prohibits some business practices and relationships under Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs. These practices include the payment, receipt, offer, or solicitation of remuneration of any kind in exchange for items or services that are reimbursed under most federal or state healthcare programs.

The Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, or OIG, is responsible for identifying and investigating fraud and abuse activities in federal healthcare programs. As part of its duties, the OIG provides guidance to healthcare providers by identifying types of activities that could violate the anti-kickback statute. The OIG also publishes regulations outlining activities and business relationships that would be deemed not to violate the anti-kickback statute. These regulations are known as “safe harbor” regulations. The

failure of a particular activity to comply with the safe harbor regulations does not necessarily mean that the activity violates the anti-kickback statute; however, such failure may lead to increased scrutiny by government enforcement authorities.

The OIG has identified the following incentive arrangements as potential violations of the anti-kickback statute:

•

payment of any incentive by the hospital when a physician refers a patient to the hospital,

•

use of free or significantly discounted office space or equipment for physicians in facilities usually located close to the hospital,

•

provision of free or significantly discounted billing, nursing, or other staff services,

•

free training for a physician’s office staff, including management and laboratory techniques (but excluding compliance training),

•

guarantees which provide that, if the physician’s income fails to reach a predetermined level, the hospital will pay any portion of the remainder,

•

low-interest or interest-free loans, or loans which may be forgiven if a physician refers patients to the hospital,

•

payment of the costs of a physician’s travel and expenses for conferences,

•

payment of services which require few, if any, substantive duties by the physician, or payment for services in excess of the fair market value of the services rendered,

•

coverage on the hospital’s group health insurance plans at an inappropriately low cost to the physician,

•

purchasing goods or services from physicians at prices in excess of their fair market value,

•

rental of space in physician offices, at other than fair market value, or

•

physician-owned entities (often referred to as physician-owned distributorships, or PODS) that derive revenue from selling, or arranging for the sale of, implantable medical devices ordered by their physician-owners for use on procedures that physician-owners perform on their own patients at hospitals or ASCs.

We have a variety of financial relationships with physicians who refer patients to our hospitals. Physicians own interests in a number of our facilities. Physicians may also own our stock. We also have contracts with physicians providing for a variety of financial arrangements, including employment contracts, leases, management agreements and professional service agreements. We provide financial incentives to recruit physicians to relocate to communities served by our hospitals. These incentives include relocation, reimbursement for certain direct expenses, income guarantees and, in some cases, loans. Although we strive to comply with the anti-kickback statute, taking into account available guidance including the “safe harbor” regulations, we cannot assure you that regulatory authorities will not determine otherwise. If that happens, we could be subject to criminal and civil penalties and/or exclusion from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, or other government healthcare programs. Pursuant to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, civil monetary penalties increased substantially in 2016, were further increased in 2017, and will continue to increase annually based on updates to the consumer price index.

The Social Security Act also includes a provision commonly known as the “Stark Law.” This law prohibits physicians from referring Medicare and Medicaid patients to healthcare entities in which they or any of their

immediate family members have ownership interests or other financial arrangements. These types of referrals are commonly known as “self referrals.” There are ownership and compensation arrangement exceptions to the self-referral prohibition. One exception, known as the “whole hospital” exception, allows a physician to make a referral to a hospital if the physician owns an interest in the entire hospital, as opposed to an ownership interest in a department of the hospital. Another exception allows a physician to refer patients to a healthcare entity in which the physician has an ownership interest if the entity is located in a rural area, as defined in the statute. There are also exceptions for many of the customary financial arrangements between physicians and providers, including employment contracts, leases and recruitment agreements. From time to time, the federal government has issued regulations which interpret the provisions included in the Stark Law.

The Affordable Care Act narrowed the “whole hospital” exception to the Stark Law. The Affordable Care Act permitted existing physician investments in a whole hospital to continue under a “grandfather” clause if the arrangement satisfies certain requirements and restrictions, but physicians are prohibited, from the time the Affordable Care Act became effective, from increasing the aggregate percentage of their ownership in the hospital. The Affordable Care Act also restricts the ability of existing physician-owned hospitals to expand the capacity of their aggregate licensed beds, operating rooms and procedure rooms. The whole hospital exception also contains additional public disclosure requirements.

Taking into account 2017 updates to such penalties, sanctions for violating the Stark Law include denial of payment, civil monetary penalties of up to $24,253 per claim submitted and exclusion from federal healthcare programs, and a penalty of up to $161,692 for a scheme intended to circumvent the Stark Law prohibitions. These civil monetary penalties will increase annually based on updates to the consumer price index.

In addition to the restrictions and disclosure requirements applicable to physician-owned hospitals under the Stark Law, CMS regulations require physician-owned hospitals and their physician owners to disclose certain ownership information to patients. Physician-owned hospitals must disclose their physician ownership in writing to patients and must make a list of their physician owners available upon request. Additionally, each physician owner who is a member of a physician-owned hospital’s medical staff must agree, as a condition of continued medical staff membership or admitting privileges, to disclose in writing to all patients whom they refer to the hospital their (or an immediate family member’s) ownership interest in the hospital. A hospital is considered to be physician-owned if any physician, or an immediate family member of a physician, holds debt, stock or other types of investment in the hospital or in any owner of the hospital, excluding physician ownership through publicly-traded securities that meet certain conditions. If a hospital fails to comply with these regulations, the hospital could lose its Medicare provider agreement and be unable to participate in Medicare.

Evolving interpretations of current, or the adoption of new, federal or state laws or regulations could affect many of the arrangements entered into by each of our hospitals. In addition, law enforcement authorities, including the OIG, the courts and Congress are increasing scrutiny of arrangements between healthcare providers and potential referral sources to ensure that the arrangements are not designed as a mechanism to improperly pay for patient referrals and/or other business. Investigators also have demonstrated a willingness to look behind the formalities of a business transaction to determine the underlying purpose of payments between healthcare providers and potential referral sources.

Many states in which we operate have also adopted laws that prohibit payments to physicians in exchange for referrals similar to the federal anti-kickback statute or that otherwise prohibit fraud and abuse activities. Many states have also passed self-referral legislation similar to the Stark Law, prohibiting the referral of patients to entities with which the physician has a financial relationship. Often these state laws are broad in scope and may apply regardless of the source of payment for care. These statutes typically provide criminal and civil penalties, as well as loss of licensure. Little precedent exists for the interpretation or enforcement of these state laws.

Our operations could be adversely affected by the failure of our arrangements to comply with the anti-kickback statute, the Stark Law, billing laws and regulations, current state laws or other legislation or regulations in these areas adopted in the future. We are unable to predict whether other legislation or regulations at the

federal or state level in any of these areas will be adopted, what form such legislation or regulations may take or how they may affect our operations. We are continuing to enter into new financial arrangements with physicians and other providers in a manner structured to comply in all material respects with these laws. We strive to comply with applicable fraud and abuse laws. We cannot assure you, however, that governmental officials responsible for enforcing these laws or whistleblowers will not assert that we are in violation of them or that such statutes or regulations ultimately will be interpreted by the courts in a manner consistent with our interpretation.

Federal False Claims Act and Similar State Laws. Another trend affecting the healthcare industry is the increased use of the federal False Claims Act, or FCA, which can be used to prosecute Medicare and other government program fraud involving issues such as coding errors, billing for service not provided and submitting false cost reports. Further, the FCA covers payments involving federal funds in connection with the health insurance exchanges created under the Affordable Care Act, if those payments involve any federal funds. Liability under the FCA often arises when an entity knowingly submits a false claim for reimbursement to the federal government. The FCA broadly defines the term “knowingly.” Although simple negligence will not give rise to liability under the FCA, submitting a claim with reckless disregard to its truth or falsity may constitute “knowingly” submitting a false claim and result in liability. Among the many other potential bases for liability under the FCA is the knowing and improper failure to report and refund amounts owed to the government within 60 days of identifying an overpayment. An overpayment is deemed to be identified when a person has, or should have through reasonable diligence, determined that an overpayment was received and quantified the overpayment. Submission of a claim for an item or service generated in violation of the anti-kickback statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim under the FCA. In some cases, whistleblowers, the federal government and courts have taken the position that providers who allegedly have violated other statutes, such as the Stark Law, have thereby submitted false claims under the FCA.

When a defendant is determined by a court of law to be liable under the FCA, the defendant must pay three times the actual damages sustained by the government, plus mandatory civil penalties of between $10,957 and $21,916 for each separate false claim, after taking into account 2017 updates to such penalties. These civil monetary penalties will increase annually based on updates to the consumer price index. Settlements entered into prior to litigation usually involve a less severe calculation of damages. The FCA also contains “qui tam” or whistleblower provisions, which allow private individuals to bring actions on behalf of the government alleging that the defendant has defrauded the federal government. If the government intervenes in the action and prevails, the party filing the initial complaint may share in any settlement or judgment. If the government does not intervene in the action, the whistleblower plaintiff may pursue the action independently and may receive a larger share of any settlement or judgment. When a private party brings a qui tam action under the FCA, the defendant generally will not be made aware of the lawsuit until the government commences its own investigation or determines whether it will intervene. Every entity that receives at least $5 million annually in Medicaid payments must have written policies for all employees, contractors and agents providing detailed information about false claims, false statements and whistleblower protections under certain federal laws, including the FCA, and similar state laws.

A number of states, including states in which we operate, have adopted their own false claims provisions as well as their own whistleblower provisions whereby a private party may file a civil lawsuit in state court. Federal law provides an incentive to states to enact false claims laws that are comparable to the FCA. From time to time, companies in the healthcare industry, including ours, may be subject to actions under the FCA or similar state laws.

Corporate Practice of Medicine; Fee-Splitting. Some states have laws that prohibit unlicensed persons or business entities, including corporations, from employing physicians. Some states also have adopted laws that prohibit direct or indirect payments to, or entering into fee-splitting arrangements with, physicians and unlicensed persons or business entities. Possible sanctions for violations of these restrictions include loss of a physician’s license, civil and criminal penalties and rescission of business arrangements. These laws vary from state to state, are often vague and have seldom been interpreted by the courts or regulatory agencies. We structure

our arrangements with healthcare providers to comply with the relevant state law. However, we cannot provide assurance that governmental officials responsible for enforcing these laws will not assert that we, or transactions in which we are involved, are in violation of these laws. These laws may also be interpreted by the courts in a manner inconsistent with our interpretations.

Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act imposes requirements as to the care that must be provided to anyone who comes to facilities providing emergency medical services seeking care before they may be transferred to another facility or otherwise denied care. Sanctions for failing to fulfill these requirements include exclusion from participation in Medicare and Medicaid programs and civil money penalties. These civil monetary penalties increased significantly in 2016, were further adjusted in 2017, and will be increased annually based on updates to the consumer price index. In addition, the law creates private civil remedies that enable an individual who suffers personal harm as a direct result of a violation of the law to sue the offending hospital for damages and equitable relief. A medical facility that suffers a financial loss as a direct result of another participating hospital’s violation of the law also has a similar right. Although we believe that our practices are in compliance with the law, we can give no assurance that governmental officials responsible for enforcing the law will not assert we are in violation of this law.

Conversion Legislation. Many states, including some where we have hospitals and others where we may in the future acquire hospitals, have adopted legislation regarding the sale or other disposition of hospitals operated by not-for-profit entities. In other states that do not have specific legislation, the attorneys general have demonstrated an interest in these transactions under their general obligations to protect charitable assets from waste. These legislative and administrative efforts primarily focus on the appropriate valuation of the assets divested and the use of the proceeds of the sale by the not-for-profit seller. While these reviews and, in some instances, approval processes can add additional time to the closing of a hospital acquisition, we have not had any significant difficulties or delays in completing the process. There can be no assurance, however, that future actions on the state level will not seriously delay or even prevent our ability to acquire hospitals. If these activities are widespread, they could limit our ability to acquire hospitals.

Certificates of Need. The construction of new facilities, the acquisition of existing facilities and the addition of new services at our facilities may be subject to state laws that require prior approval by state regulatory agencies. These CON laws generally require that a state agency determine the public need and give approval prior to the construction or acquisition of facilities or the addition of new services. As of December 31, 2016, we operated 83 hospitals in 12 states that have adopted CON laws for acute care facilities. If we fail to obtain necessary state approval, we will not be able to expand our facilities, complete acquisitions or add new services in these states. Violation of these state laws may result in the imposition of civil sanctions or the revocation of a hospital’s licenses.

HIPAA Administrative Simplification and Privacy and Security Requirements. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, requires the use of uniform electronic data transmission standards for healthcare claims and payment transactions submitted or received electronically. These provisions are intended to encourage electronic commerce in the healthcare industry. HHS has established electronic data transmission standards that all healthcare providers must use when submitting or receiving certain healthcare transactions electronically. In addition, HIPAA requires that each provider use a National Provider Identifier. All healthcare providers covered by HIPAA were required to transition to updated standard code sets for certain diagnoses and procedures, known as ICD-10 code sets, by October 1, 2015. We have transitioned all of our hospitals to the ICD-10 coding system. The Affordable Care Act requires the HHS to adopt standards for additional electronic transactions and to establish operating rules to promote uniformity in the implementation of each standardized electronic transaction.

As required by HIPAA, HHS has issued privacy and security regulations that extensively regulate the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health-related information and require covered entities, including health plans and most healthcare providers, to implement administrative, physical and technical practices to protect the security of individually identifiable health information that is electronically maintained or transmitted. Certain

provisions of the security and privacy regulations apply to business associates (entities that handle identifiable health-related information on behalf of covered entities), and business associates are subject to direct liability for violation of the regulations. In addition, a covered entity may be subject to penalties as a result of a business associate violating HIPAA, if the business associate is found to be an agent of the covered entity. We have developed and utilize a HIPAA compliance plan as part of our effort to comply with HIPAA privacy and security requirements. The privacy regulations and security regulations have and will continue to impose significant costs on us in order to comply with these standards.

Covered entities must report breaches of unsecured protected health information to affected individuals without unreasonable delay, but not to exceed 60 days of discovery of the breach by the covered entity or its agents. Notification must also be made to HHS and, in certain situations involving large breaches, to the media. HHS is required to publish on its website a list of all covered entities that report a breach involving more than 500 individuals. All non-permitted uses or disclosures of unsecured protected health information are presumed to be breaches unless the covered entity or business associate establishes that there is a low probability the information has been compromised. Various state laws and regulations may also require us to notify affected individuals in the event of a data breach involving individually identifiable information.

Violations of the HIPAA privacy and security regulations may result in criminal penalties and in civil penalties of up to $55,910 per violation for a maximum of $1,677,299 in a calendar year for violations of the same requirement. These penalties will increase annually based on updates to the consumer price index. HHS is required to perform compliance audits. In addition to enforcement by HHS, state attorneys general are authorized to bring civil actions seeking either injunction or damages in response to violations of HIPAA privacy and security regulations that threaten the privacy of state residents. HHS may resolve HIPAA violations through informal means, such as allowing a covered entity to implement a corrective action plan, but HHS has the discretion to move directly to impose monetary penalties and is required to impose penalties for violations resulting from willful neglect. Our facilities also are subject to any federal or state privacy-related laws that are more restrictive than the privacy regulations issued under HIPAA. These laws vary and could impose additional penalties. For example, the Federal Trade Commission uses its consumer protection authority to initiate enforcement actions in response to data breaches.

Payment

Medicare. Under the Medicare program, we are paid for inpatient and outpatient services performed by our hospitals.

Payments for inpatient acute services are generally made pursuant to a prospective payment system, commonly known as “PPS.” Under PPS, our hospitals are paid a predetermined amount for each hospital discharge based on the patient’s diagnosis. Specifically, each discharge is assigned to a diagnosis-related group, commonly known as a “DRG,” based upon the patient’s condition and treatment during the relevant inpatient stay. Each DRG is assigned a payment rate using 100% of the national average cost per case and 100% of the severity-adjusted DRG weights. DRG payments are based on national averages and not on charges or costs specific to a hospital. Severity-adjusted DRGs more accurately reflect the costs a hospital incurs for caring for a patient and account more fully for the severity of each patient’s condition. However, DRG payments are adjusted by a predetermined geographic adjustment factor assigned to the geographic area in which the hospital is located. While a hospital generally does not receive payment in addition to a DRG payment, hospitals may qualify for an “outlier” payment when the relevant patient’s treatment costs are extraordinarily high and exceed a specified regulatory threshold.

The DRG payment rates are adjusted by an update factor on October 1 of each year, the beginning of the federal fiscal year. The index used to adjust the DRG payment rates, known as the “market basket index,” gives consideration to the inflation experienced by hospitals in purchasing goods and services. DRG payment rates were increased by the full “market basket index,” for the federal fiscal years 2016 and 2017 by 2.4% and 2.7% respectively, subject to certain reductions. For federal fiscal year 2016, the DRG payment rates were reduced by

0.8% for documentation and coding; reduced by 0.5% for the multi-factor productivity adjustment; and reduced by 0.2% in accordance with the Affordable Care Act. There was also a 0.2% downward adjustment to offset projected spending increases associated with admission and medical review criteria for inpatient services commonly known as the “two midnight rule.” For federal fiscal year 2017, the DRG payment rates were reduced by 1.5% for documentation and coding; reduced by 0.3% for the multi-factor productivity adjustment; and reduced by 0.75% in accordance with the Affordable Care Act. There is also a positive 0.8% adjustment to remove the effects of prior adjustments intended to offset projected spending increases associated with the “two midnight rule.” Under the rule, services to Medicare beneficiaries are only payable as inpatient hospital services when there is a reasonable expectation that the hospital care is medically necessary and will be required across two midnights, absent unusual circumstances. A 25% reduction to the market basket index occurs if patient quality data is not submitted, and a reduction of 75% of the market basket index update occurs for hospitals that fail to demonstrate meaningful use of certified electronic health records, or EHR, technology without receiving a hardship exception. Future legislation may decrease the rate of increase for DRG payments or even decrease such payment rates, but we are unable to predict the amount of any reduction or the effect that any reduction will have on us.

The DRG payment rates are also adjusted to promote value-based purchasing, linking payments to quality and efficiency. First, hospitals that meet or exceed certain quality performance standards will receive greater reimbursement under CMS’s value-based purchasing program, while hospitals that do not satisfy certain quality performance standards will receive reduced Medicare inpatient hospital payments. The amount collected from the reductions is pooled and used to fund the payments that reward hospitals based on a set of quality measures that have been linked to improved clinical processes of care and patient satisfaction. CMS scores each hospital on its achievement relative to other hospitals and improvement relative to that hospital’s own past performance. Second, hospitals experiencing “excess readmissions” for conditions designated by CMS within 30 days from the patient’s date of discharge will receive inpatient payments reduced by an amount determined by comparing that hospital’s readmission performance to a risk-adjusted national average. Third, the 25% of hospitals with the worst national risk-adjusted hospital acquired condition, or HAC, rates in the previous year will have their total inpatient operating Medicare payments reduced by 1%. HHS has indicated that it will increase its efforts to promote, develop and use alternative payment models such as Accountable Care Organizations, or ACOs, and bundled payment arrangements.

In addition, hospitals may qualify for Medicare disproportionate share payments when their percentage of low income patients exceeds specified regulatory thresholds. A majority of our hospitals qualify to receive Medicare disproportionate share payments. Medicare disproportionate share payments are reduced by 75% and earmarked for an uncompensated care payment pool, in accordance with the Affordable Care Act. The uncompensated care pool is further reduced each year by a formula that reflects reductions in the U.S. uninsured population that is under 65 years of age. Thus, the greater the level of coverage for the uninsured, the more the Medicare uncompensated care pool will be reduced. Each eligible hospital is then paid, out of the uncompensated care pool, an amount based upon its estimated cost of providing uncompensated care. At this time, we cannot predict an impact for this change. These Medicare disproportionate share and uncompensated care payments as a percentage of operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before the provision for bad debts), were 1.0% and 1.2% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Hospitals may also qualify for Medicaid disproportionate share payments when they qualify under the state established guidelines. These Medicaid disproportionate share payments as a percentage of operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before the provision for bad debts), were 0.3% and 0.4% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

We also receive Medicare reimbursement for outpatient services through a PPS. The outpatient conversion factor was increased 2.4% effective January 1, 2016; however, there was a 0.2% downward adjustment in accordance with the Affordable Care Act, a 0.5% downward productivity adjustment and a 2.0% downward adjustment to address what CMS views as inflated payments for laboratory tests packaged with payments for hospital outpatient services. The outpatient conversion factor was increased 2.7% effective January 1, 2017;

however, there was a 0.75% downward adjustment in accordance with the Affordable Care Act and a 0.3% downward productivity adjustment and other payment adjustments, for an estimated 1.65% increase. Taking into account these and other payment adjustments, CMS estimates the 2017 update will result in a 1.7% increase in outpatient PPS payments to hospitals. For fiscal year 2017, an additional 2.0% reduction applies to hospitals that do not submit required patient quality data. We are complying with this data submission requirement.

The Medicare reimbursement discussed above was reduced beginning in 2013 due to the Budget Control Act of 2011 that required across-the-board spending cuts to the federal budget, also known as sequestration. These sequestration cuts included reductions in payments for Medicare and other federally funded healthcare programs, including TRICARE. The cuts began on March 1, 2013, with the sequester-related Medicare reimbursement cuts beginning April 1, 2013. These reductions have been extended through 2025.

Payment under the Medicare program for physician services is based upon the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, or MPFS, under which CMS has assigned a national relative value unit, or RVU, to most medical procedures and services that reflects the resources required to provide the services relative to all other services. Each RVU is calculated based on a combination of the time and intensity of work required, overhead expense attributable to the service, and malpractice insurance expense. These elements are each modified by a geographic adjustment factor to account for local practice costs and are then aggregated. MACRA provides for a 0.5% update to the MPFS for each calendar year through 2019. MACRA also requires the establishment of the Quality Payment Program, or QPP, a payment methodology intended to reward high-quality patient care. Beginning in 2017, physicians and certain other healthcare clinicians are required to participate in one of two QPP tracks. Under both tracks, performance data collected in 2017 will affect Medicare payments in 2019. CMS expects to transition increasing financial risk to providers as QPP evolves. Under the Advanced Alternative Payment Model, or Advanced APM, track, incentive payments are available based on participation in specific innovative payment models approved by CMS. Providers may earn a Medicare incentive payment and will be exempt from the reporting requirements and payment adjustments imposed under the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System, or MIPS, if the provider has sufficient participation in an Advanced APM. Alternatively, providers may participate in the MIPS track, under which physicians will receive performance-based payment incentives or payment reductions based on their performance with respect to clinical quality, resource use, clinical improvement activities, and meaningful use of EHR. MIPS will consolidate components of certain existing physician incentive programs.

In addition to changing Medicare physician payment methodology, MACRA extended the Medicare Inpatient Low Volume payment and Medicare Dependent Hospital programs to qualifying hospitals through September 30, 2017. If additional legislation is not passed to extend these Medicare hospital payment programs, we could experience a reduction in future reimbursement.

Medicaid. Most state Medicaid payments are made under a PPS or under programs which negotiate payment levels with individual hospitals. Medicaid is funded jointly by state and federal government. The federal government and many states are currently considering significantly reducing Medicaid funding, while at the same time expanding Medicaid benefits. Currently, several states utilize supplemental reimbursement programs for the purpose of providing reimbursement to providers to offset a portion of the cost of providing care to Medicaid and indigent patients. These programs are designed with input from CMS and are funded with a combination of state and federal resources, including, in certain instances, fees or taxes levied on the providers. Similar programs are also being considered by other states. We can provide no assurance that reductions to Medicaid funding will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations. Further, the Affordable Care Act prohibits the use of federal funds under the Medicaid program to reimburse providers for medical services provided to treat HACs.

TRICARE. TRICARE is the Department of Defense’s healthcare program for members of the armed forces. For inpatient services, TRICARE generally reimburses hospitals based on a DRG system modeled on the Medicare inpatient PPS. For outpatient services, TRICARE reimburses hospitals based on a PPS that is similar to that utilized for services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries.

Annual Cost Reports. Hospitals participating in the Medicare and some Medicaid programs, whether paid on a reasonable cost basis or under a PPS, are required to meet specified financial reporting requirements. Federal and, where applicable, state regulations require submission of annual cost reports identifying medical costs and expenses associated with the services provided by each hospital to Medicare beneficiaries and Medicaid recipients.

Annual cost reports required under the Medicare and some Medicaid programs are subject to routine governmental audits. These audits may result in adjustments to the amounts ultimately determined to be due to us under these reimbursement programs. Finalization of these audits often takes several years. Providers can appeal any final determination made in connection with an audit. DRG outlier payments have been and continue to be the subject of CMS audit and adjustment. The OIG is also actively engaged in audits and investigations into alleged abuses of the DRG outlier payment system.

Commercial Insurance and Managed Care Companies. Our hospitals provide services to individuals covered by private healthcare insurance or by health plans administered by managed care companies. These payors pay our hospitals or in some cases reimburse their policyholders based upon the hospital’s established charges and the coverage provided in the insurance policy. They try to limit the costs of hospital services by negotiating discounts, including PPS, which would reduce payments by commercial insurers or health plans to our hospitals. Commercial insurers and managed care companies also seek to reduce payments to hospitals by establishing payment rules that in effect re-characterize the services ordered by physicians. For example, some payors vigorously review each patient’s length of stay in the hospital and recharacterize as outpatient all in-patient stays of less than a particular duration (e.g. 24 hours). Reductions in payments for services provided by our hospitals to individuals covered by these payors could adversely affect us.

Medicare Administrative Contractors. CMS competitively bids the Medicare fiscal intermediary and Medicare carrier functions to Medicare Administrative Contractors, or MACs, in 12 jurisdictions. Each MAC is geographically assigned and serves both Part A and Part B providers within a given jurisdiction. Chain providers had the option of having all hospitals use one home office MAC, and we chose to do so. However, CMS has not converted all of our hospitals to one MAC and currently does not have an established date to accomplish the conversion. CMS periodically re-solicits bids, and the MAC servicing a geographic area can change as a result of the bid competition. MAC transition periods can impact claims processing functions and the resulting cash flow.

Medicare Integrity. CMS contracts with third parties to promote the integrity of the Medicare program through review of quality concerns and detection of improper payments. Quality Improvement Organizations, or QIOs, for example, are groups of physicians and other healthcare quality experts which work on behalf of CMS to ensure that Medicare pays only for goods and services that are reasonable and necessary and that are provided in the most appropriate setting. Under the Recovery Audit Contractor, or RAC, program, CMS contracts with RACs nationwide to conduct post-payment reviews to detect and correct improper payments in the Medicare program, as required by statute. RACs review claims submitted to Medicare for billing compliance, including correct coding and medical necessity. Compensation for RACs is on a contingency basis and based upon the amount of overpayments and underpayments identified, if any. CMS limits the number of claims that RACs may audit by limiting the number of records that RACs may request from hospitals based on each provider’s claim denial rate for the previous year.

The RAC program’s scope also includes Medicaid claims. States may coordinate with Medicaid RACs regarding recoupment of overpayments and refer suspected fraud and abuse to appropriate law enforcement agencies. Under the Medicaid Integrity Program, CMS employs private contractors, referred to as Medicaid Integrity Contractors, or MICs, to perform reviews and post-payment audits of Medicaid claims and identify overpayments. MICs are assigned to five geographic jurisdictions. Besides MICs, several other contractors and state Medicaid agencies have increased their review activities.

We maintain policies and procedures to respond to the RAC requests and payment denials. Payment recoveries resulting from RAC reviews and denials are appealable, and we pursue reversal of adverse determinations at

appropriate appeal levels. Currently, there are significant delays in the assignment of new Medicare appeals to Administrative Law Judges. According to the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals, the average processing time in fiscal year 2016 was nearly two and a half years. HHS has finalized rules intended to streamline the process and improve efficiency, but has also stressed the need for additional funding. Thus, we may experience significant delays in appealing any RAC payment denials. To ease the backlog of appeals, CMS has made available an administrative settlement process for disputed claims, offering to pay 66% of the net allowable amount in exchange for a hospital’s withdrawal of all medical claims appealed. We are participating in this settlement process. Depending upon the growth of RAC programs and our success in appealing claims in future periods, our cash flows and results of operations could be negatively impacted.

Accountable Care Organizations. With the aim of reducing healthcare costs by improving quality and operational efficiency, ACOs are gaining traction in both the public and private sectors. An ACO is a network of providers and suppliers (including hospitals, physicians and other designated professionals) which work together to invest in infrastructure and redesign delivery processes to achieve high quality and efficient delivery of services. ACOs are intended to produce savings as a result of improved quality and operational efficiency. Pursuant to the Affordable Care Act, HHS established a Medicare Shared Savings Program that seeks to promote accountability and coordination of care through the creation of ACOs. Medicare-approved ACOs that achieve quality performance standards established by HHS are eligible to share in a portion of the amounts saved by the Medicare program. HHS has significant discretion to determine key elements of ACO programs. Certain waivers are available from fraud and abuse laws for ACOs.

Bundled Payment Initiatives. The CMS Innovation Center is responsible for establishing demonstration projects and other initiatives in order to identify, develop, test and encourage the adoption of new methods of delivering and paying for healthcare that create savings under the Medicare and Medicaid programs, while maintaining or improving quality of care. For example, providers participating in bundled payment initiatives accept accountability for costs and quality of care by agreeing to receive one payment for services provided to Medicare patients for certain medical conditions or episodes of care. By rewarding providers for increasing quality and reducing costs and penalizing providers if costs exceed a certain amount, bundled payment models are intended to lead to higher quality, more coordinated care at a lower cost to the Medicare program. The CMS Innovation Center has implemented a voluntary bundled payment program known as the Bundled Payment for Care Improvement, or BPCI, initiative. We are participating in BPCI initiatives in eleven of our markets. More recently, the CMS Innovation Center has established mandatory bundled payment programs for hospitals in selected geographic areas, including some of our hospitals. These mandatory initiatives focus on orthopedic and cardiac care.

Supply Contracts

In March 2005, we began purchasing items, primarily medical supplies, medical equipment and pharmaceuticals, under an agreement with HealthTrust, a GPO in which we are a noncontrolling partner. As of December 31, 2016, we had a 23.1% ownership interest in HealthTrust. By participating in this organization, we are able to procure items at competitively priced rates for our hospitals. There can be no assurance that our arrangement with HealthTrust will continue to provide the discounts that we have historically received.

Competition

The hospital industry is highly competitive. An important part of our business strategy is to continue to acquire hospitals in non-urban markets and selected urban markets. However, other for-profit hospital companies and not-for-profit hospital systems generally attempt to acquire the same type of hospitals as we do. In addition, some hospitals are sold through an auction process, which may result in higher purchase prices than we believe are reasonable.

In addition to the competition we face for acquisitions, we must also compete with other hospitals and healthcare providers for patients. The competition among hospitals and other healthcare providers for patients

has intensified in recent years. The majority of our hospitals are located in non-urban service areas in which we are the sole provider of general acute care health services. Those hospitals in non-urban service areas face no direct competition because there are no other hospitals in their primary service areas. However, these hospitals face competition from hospitals outside of their primary service area, including hospitals in urban areas that provide more complex services. Patients in those service areas may travel to these other hospitals for a variety of reasons, including the need for services we do not offer or physician referrals. Patients who are required to seek services from these other hospitals may subsequently shift their preferences to those hospitals for services we do provide. Those hospitals in selected urban service areas may face competition from hospitals that are more established than our hospitals. Certain of these competing facilities offer services, including extensive medical research and medical education programs, which are not offered by our facilities. In addition, in certain markets where we operate, there are large teaching hospitals that provide highly specialized facilities, equipment and services that may not be available at our hospitals. We also face competition from other specialized care providers, including outpatient surgery, orthopedic, oncology and diagnostic centers. Some competitors are implementing physician alignment strategies, such as employing physicians, acquiring physician practice groups, and participating in ACOs, or other clinical integration models. We believe that we will continue to face increased competition in outpatient service models that become more integrated through acquisitions or partnerships between physicians, specialized care providers, and managed care payors.

In most markets in which we are not the sole provider of general acute care health services, our primary competitor is a not-for-profit hospital. These hospitals are owned by tax-supported governmental agencies or not-for-profit entities supported by endowments and charitable contributions. These hospitals do not pay income or property taxes, and can make capital expenditures without paying sales tax. These financial advantages may better position such hospitals to maintain more modern and technologically upgraded facilities and equipment and offer services more specialized than those available at our hospitals.

The number and quality of the physicians on a hospital’s staff is an important factor in a hospital’s competitive position. Physicians decide whether a patient is admitted to the hospital and the procedures to be performed. Admitting physicians may be on the medical staffs of other hospitals in addition to those of our hospitals. We attempt to attract our physicians’ patients to our hospitals by offering quality services and facilities, convenient locations and state-of-the-art equipment. In addition, CMS publicizes on its Hospital Compare website data that hospitals submit in connection with Medicare reimbursement claims, including performance data related to quality measures and patient satisfaction surveys. Federal law provides for the future expansion of the number of quality measures that must be reported. Additional quality measures and other future trends toward clinical transparency may have a potential impact on our competitive position and patient volumes in ways that we are unable to predict. In addition, hospitals must either make public a list of their standard charges, or their policies for allowing the public to view a list of these charges in response to an inquiry.

Compliance Program

We take an operations team approach to compliance and utilize corporate experts for program design efforts and facility leaders for employee-level implementation. We believe compliance is another area that demonstrates our utilization of standardization and centralization techniques and initiatives which yield efficiencies and consistency throughout our facilities. We recognize that our compliance with applicable laws and regulations depends on individual employee actions as well as company operations. Our approach focuses on integrating compliance responsibilities with operational functions. This approach is intended to reinforce our company-wide commitment to operate strictly in accordance with the laws and regulations that govern our business.

Our company-wide compliance program has been in place since 1997. Currently, the program’s elements include leadership, management and oversight at the highest levels, a Code of Conduct, risk area specific policies and procedures, employee education and training, an internal system for reporting concerns, auditing and monitoring programs and a means for enforcing the program’s policies.

The compliance program continues to be expanded and developed to meet the industry’s expectations and our needs. Specific written policies, procedures, training and educational materials and programs, as well as auditing

and monitoring activities, have been prepared and implemented to address the functional and operational aspects of our business. Included within these functional areas are materials and activities for business sub-units, including laboratory, radiology, pharmacy, emergency, surgery, observation, home care, skilled nursing and clinics. Specific areas identified through regulatory interpretation and enforcement activities have also been addressed in our program. Claims preparation and submission, including coding, billing and cost reports, comprise the bulk of these areas. Financial arrangements with physicians and other referral sources, including compliance with the federal anti-kickback statute and the Stark Law, emergency department treatment and transfer requirements and other patient disposition issues, are also the focus of policy and training, standardized documentation requirements and review and audit. Another focus of the program is the interpretation and implementation of the HIPAA standards for privacy and security.

We have a Code of Conduct which applies to all directors, officers, employees and consultants, and a confidential disclosure program to enhance the statement of ethical responsibility expected of our employees and business associates who work in the accounting, financial reporting and asset management areas of our Company. Our Code of Conduct is posted on our website at www.chs.net/company-overview/code-of-conduct.

Corporate Integrity Agreement

On August 4, 2014, we announced that we had entered into a civil settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice, other federal agencies and identified relators that concluded previously announced investigations and litigation related to short stay admissions through emergency departments at certain of our affiliated hospitals. See the “Legal Proceedings” discussion in Part II, Item 1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014 for further discussion of the background of this matter and details of the settlement. In addition to the amounts paid in the settlement, we executed a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement, or CIA, with the OIG that has been incorporated into our existing and comprehensive compliance program.

The compliance measures and reporting and auditing requirements contained in the CIA include:

•

continuing the duties and activities of our Corporate Compliance Officer, Corporate Compliance Work Group, and Facility Compliance Officers and committees;

•

maintaining our written Code of Conduct, which sets forth our commitment to full compliance with all statutes, regulations, and guidelines applicable to federal healthcare programs;

•

maintaining our written policies and procedures addressing the operation of our Compliance Program, including adherence to medical necessity and admissions standards for inpatient hospital stays;

•

continuing our general compliance training;

•

providing specific training for appropriate personnel on billing, case management and clinical documentation;

•

engaging an independent third party to perform an annual review of our compliance with the CIA;

•

continuing our Confidential Disclosure Program and hotline to enable employees or others to disclose issues or questions regarding possible inappropriate policies or behavior;

•

enhancing our screening program to ensure that we do not hire or engage employees or contractors who are ineligible persons for federal healthcare programs;

•

reporting any material deficiency which resulted in an overpayment to us by a federal healthcare program; and

•

submitting annual reports to the OIG which describe in detail the operations of our corporate Compliance Program for the past year.

Material, uncorrected violations of the CIA could lead to our suspension or disbarment from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal and state healthcare programs and repayment obligations. In addition, we are subject to possible civil penalties for failure to substantially comply with the terms of the CIA, including stipulated penalties ranging from $1,000 to $2,500 per day. We are also subject to a stipulated penalty of $50,000 for each false certification made by us or on our behalf in connection with reports required under the CIA. The CIA increases the amount of information we must provide to the federal government regarding our healthcare practices and our compliance with federal regulations. The reports we provide in connection with the CIA could result in greater scrutiny by regulatory authorities. We believe our existing Compliance Program addresses compliance with the operational terms of the CIA.

Employees and Medical Staff

At December 31, 2016, we had approximately 120,000 employees, including approximately 24,000 part-time employees. References herein to “employees” refer to employees of our affiliates. We are subject to various state and federal laws that regulate wages, hours, benefits and other terms and conditions relating to employment. At December 31, 2016, certain employees at 23 of our hospitals are represented by various labor unions. It is likely that union organizing efforts will take place at additional hospitals in the future. We consider our employee relations to be good and have not experienced work stoppages that have materially, adversely affected our business or results of operations. Our hospitals, like most hospitals, have experienced rising labor costs. In some markets, nurse and medical support personnel availability has become a significant operating issue to healthcare providers. To address this challenge, we have implemented several initiatives to improve retention, recruiting, compensation programs and productivity.

Our hospitals are staffed by licensed physicians, including both employed physicians and physicians who are not employees of our hospitals. Some physicians provide services in our hospitals under contracts, which generally describe a term of service, provide and establish the duties and obligations of such physicians, require the maintenance of certain performance criteria and fix compensation for such services. Any licensed physician may apply to be accepted to the medical staff of any of our hospitals, but the hospital’s medical staff and the appropriate governing board of the hospital, in accordance with established credentialing criteria, must approve acceptance to the staff. Members of the medical staffs of our hospitals often also serve on the medical staffs of other hospitals and may terminate their affiliation with one of our hospitals at any time.

We may be required to continue to enhance wages and benefits to recruit and retain nurses and other medical support personnel or to hire more expensive temporary or contract personnel. As a result, our labor costs could increase. We also depend on the available labor pool of semi-skilled and unskilled employees in each of the markets in which we operate. Certain proposed changes in federal labor laws and the National Labor Relations Board’s pending modification of its election procedures could increase the likelihood of employee unionization attempts. To the extent a significant portion of our employee base unionizes, our costs could increase significantly. In addition, the states in which we operate could adopt mandatory nurse-staffing ratios or could reduce mandatory nurse-staffing ratios already in place. State-mandated nurse-staffing ratios could significantly affect labor costs, and have an adverse impact on revenues if we are required to limit patient admissions in order to meet the required ratios.

Professional Liability Claims

As part of our business of owning and operating hospitals, we are subject to legal actions alleging liability on our part. To cover claims arising out of the operations of hospitals, we maintain professional malpractice liability insurance and general liability insurance on a claims made basis in excess of those amounts for which we are self-insured, in amounts we believe to be sufficient for our operations. We also maintain umbrella liability coverage for claims which, due to their nature or amount, are not covered by our other insurance policies.

However, our insurance coverage does not cover all claims against us or may not continue to be available at a reasonable cost for us to maintain adequate levels of insurance. For a further discussion of our insurance coverage, see our discussion of professional liability claims in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.

Environmental Matters

We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the use, discharge and disposal of hazardous materials, including medical and pharmaceutical waste products. We do not currently expect compliance with these laws and regulations to have a material adverse effect on us. It is possible, however, that environmental issues may arise in the future which we cannot now predict.

We are insured for damages of personal property or environmental injury arising out of environmental impairment for both above ground and underground storage tank issues under one insurance policy for all of our hospitals. Our policy coverage is $5 million per occurrence with a $50,000 deductible and a $20 million annual aggregate. This policy also provides pollution legal liability coverage.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business faces a variety of risks. If any of the events or circumstances described in any of the following risk factors occurs, our business, results of operations or financial condition could be materially and adversely affected, and our actual results may differ materially from those predicted in any forward-looking statements we make in any public disclosures. Additional factors that could affect our business, results of operations and financial condition are discussed elsewhere in this Report (including in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K). Additional risks or uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently deem immaterial, also may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our level of indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to refinance existing indebtedness or raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry and prevent us from meeting our obligations under the agreements related to our indebtedness.

We have a significant amount of indebtedness, which is more fully described in the Capital Resources section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K and the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. As of December 31, 2016, we had approximately $8.8 billion aggregate principal amount of senior secured indebtedness outstanding, and approximately $6.4 billion of senior unsecured indebtedness outstanding. A substantial amount of our outstanding indebtedness under our senior secured credit facility and outstanding notes is scheduled to mature at various dates beginning in December 2018 and through 2019. Our substantial leverage could have important consequences for you, including the following:

•

it may limit our ability to refinance existing indebtedness or obtain additional debt or equity financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes;

•

our ability to refinance our indebtedness on favorable terms, or at all, is dependent on (among other things) conditions in the credit and capital markets, which are beyond our control;

•

a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations will be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness and will not be available for other purposes, including to fund our operations, capital expenditures, and future business opportunities;

•

the debt service requirements of our indebtedness could make it more difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations;

•

some of our borrowings, including borrowings under our credit facility, accrue interest at variable rates, exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates;

•

it may limit our ability to make strategic acquisitions or cause us to make certain divestitures;

•

it may limit our ability to adjust to changing market conditions and place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that are less leveraged; and

•

it may increase our vulnerability in connection with adverse changes in general economic, industry or competitive conditions or government regulations or other adverse developments.

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness, and we may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness, which may not be successful.

Our ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance our indebtedness depends on our financial and operating performance, which is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to financial, business, regulatory and other factors beyond our control. We cannot assure you that we will maintain a level of cash flows from operating activities sufficient to permit us to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness.

In addition, we are a holding company with no direct operations. Our principal assets are the equity interests we hold in our operating subsidiaries. As a result, we are dependent upon dividends and other payments from our subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to meet our outstanding debt service and other obligations. Our subsidiaries may not generate sufficient cash from operations to enable us to make principal and interest payments on our indebtedness. In addition, any payments of dividends, distributions, loans or advances to us by our subsidiaries are subject to certain legal and contractual restrictions, including under our credit facility and indentures.

We may find it necessary or prudent to refinance certain of our outstanding indebtedness, the terms of which may not be favorable to us. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness on favorable terms, or at all, is directly affected by the then current general economic and financial conditions. In addition, our ability to incur secured indebtedness (which would generally enable us to achieve better pricing than the incurrence of unsecured indebtedness) depends in part on the value of our assets, which depends, in turn, on the strength of our cash flows and results of operations, and on economic and market conditions and other factors.

If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we could face substantial liquidity problems and may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets or operations, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. We cannot assure you that we would be able to take any of these actions, that these actions would be successful and permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations or that these actions would be permitted under the terms of our existing or future debt agreements, including our credit facility and the indentures governing our outstanding notes. For example, our credit facility and the indentures governing our outstanding notes restrict our ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from any dispositions. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions and any proceeds we receive may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due.

Restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our indebtedness may adversely affect us.

Our credit facility and the indentures governing our outstanding notes contain various covenants that limit our ability to take certain actions, including our ability to:

•

incur, assume or guarantee additional indebtedness;

•

issue redeemable stock and preferred stock;

•

repurchase capital stock;

•

make restricted payments, including paying dividends and making certain loans, acquisitions and investments;

•

redeem debt that is subordinated in right of payment to our outstanding notes;

•

create liens;

•

sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of subsidiaries;

•

impair the security interests;

•

enter into agreements that restrict dividends and certain other payments from subsidiaries;

•

merge, consolidate, sell or otherwise dispose of substantially all our assets;

•

enter into transactions with affiliates; and

•

guarantee certain obligations.

In addition, our credit facility contains restrictive covenants and requires us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy other financial condition tests. Our ability to meet these restrictive covenants and financial ratios and tests may be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we will meet those tests.

A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under our credit facility and the indentures governing our outstanding notes. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under our credit facility or the indentures governing our outstanding notes, all amounts outstanding under our credit facility and our outstanding notes may become immediately due and payable and all commitments under the credit facility to extend further credit may be terminated. The acceleration of any such indebtedness will result in an event of default under all of our other long-term indebtedness.

Our variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt service obligations to increase significantly.

Our borrowings under our credit facility are at variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk. If interest rates increase, our debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness would increase even though the amount borrowed remained the same, and our net income would decrease. Our interest expense, net, for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $ 962 million. For the year ended December 31, 2016, a fluctuation in interest rates of 1% on our variable rate debt that is not hedged by interest rate swaps would have resulted in a fluctuation in our interest expense of approximately $50 million.

Despite current indebtedness levels, we may still be able to incur substantially more debt. This could further exacerbate the risks described above.

We and our subsidiaries have the ability to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future, subject to restrictions contained in our credit facilities and the indentures governing our outstanding notes. Our credit facility as well as a separate receivables facility provide for commitments and borrowings of up to approximately $8.2 billion in the aggregate, of which approximately $7.2 billion is outstanding at December 31, 2016. Our credit facility also gives us the ability to provide for one or more additional tranches of term loans and increases in our revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of up to the greater of (x) $1.5 billion and (y) an amount such that our senior secured net leverage ratio would not exceed 4.50:1.00 without the consent of the existing lenders if specified criteria are satisfied. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks

that we now face could be further exacerbated. For the 12-month period ended December 31, 2016, (a) the interest coverage ratio financial covenant in our credit facilities required the ratio of consolidated EBITDA, as defined, to consolidated interest expense to be greater than or equal to 2.00 to 1.00 and (b) the secured net leverage ratio financial covenant in our credit facilities limited the ratio of secured debt to consolidated EBITDA, as defined, to less than or equal to 4.50 to 1.00. We were in compliance with all such covenants at December 31, 2016, with an interest coverage ratio of approximately 2.43 to 1.00 and a secured net leverage ratio of approximately 3.96 to 1.00. If additional indebtedness is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we currently face related to indebtedness as noted above could increase.

Failure to improve operations at certain hospitals acquired from HMA could adversely affect us.

We have achieved synergies from the HMA merger as a result of eliminating duplicate corporate functions and centralizing many support functions. However, we cannot be certain whether, and to what extent, additional operating improvements and efficiencies in connection with the HMA merger will be achieved in the future. In addition, operational improvement of some of the HMA hospitals has been more difficult to achieve than anticipated. Moreover, costs associated with HMA’s legal proceedings and other loss contingencies may be greater than expected, and could exceed the amount of any reduction in payment under the contingent value rights, or CVRs, issued in the HMA merger to HMA stockholders.

In order to obtain the intended benefits of the merger, we must achieve additional efficiencies and improve operations at certain of the former HMA hospitals. Such operational improvement may be complex and the failure to do so efficiently and effectively may negatively affect earnings.

We are the subject of various legal, regulatory and governmental proceedings that, if resolved unfavorably, could have an adverse effect on us, and we may be subject to other loss contingencies, both known and unknown.

We are a party to various legal, regulatory and governmental proceedings and other related matters. Those proceedings include, among other things, government investigations. In addition, we are and may become subject to other loss contingencies, both known and unknown, which may relate to past, present and future facts, events, circumstances and occurrences. Should an unfavorable outcome occur in connection with our legal, regulatory or governmental proceedings or other loss contingencies, or if we become subject to any such loss contingencies in the future, there could be an adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

In particular, government investigations, as well as qui tam lawsuits, may lead to significant fines, penalties, damages payments or other sanctions, including exclusion from government healthcare programs. Settlements of lawsuits involving Medicare and Medicaid issues routinely require both monetary payments and corporate integrity agreements, each of which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows.

The impact of past acquisitions, as well as potential future acquisitions, could have a negative effect on our operations.

Our business strategy has historically included growth by acquisitions. However, not-for-profit hospital systems and other for-profit hospital companies generally attempt to acquire the same type of hospitals as we do. LifePoint Health, Inc. is a principal competitor for acquisitions. Other competitors include HCA Holdings, Inc., Universal Health Services, Inc., other non-public, for profit hospitals and local market hospitals. Some of the competitors for our acquisitions have greater financial resources than we have. Furthermore, some hospitals are sold through an auction process, which may result in higher purchase prices than we believe are reasonable. Therefore, we may not be able to acquire additional hospitals on terms favorable to us.

In addition, many of the hospitals we have acquired have had lower operating margins than we do and operating losses incurred prior to the time we acquired them. Hospitals acquired in the future may have similar

financial performance issues. In the past, we have experienced delays in improving the operating margins or effectively integrating the operations of certain acquired hospitals. In the future, if we are unable to improve the operating margins of acquired hospitals, operate them profitably, or effectively integrate their operations, our results of operations and business may be adversely affected.

Moreover, hospitals that we have acquired, or in the future could acquire, may have unknown or contingent liabilities, including liabilities for failure to comply with healthcare laws and regulations. Although we generally seek indemnification from sellers covering these matters, we may nevertheless have material liabilities for past activities of acquired hospitals.

If we are unable to complete divestitures that are currently contemplated, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

As noted above, we have been implementing a portfolio rationalization and deleveraging strategy by divesting hospitals and non-hospital businesses that are attractive to strategic and other buyers. Generally, these businesses are not in one of our strategically beneficial service areas, are less complementary to our business strategy and/or have lower operating margins. However, there is no assurance that these contemplated dispositions will be completed, will be completed within our contemplated timeframe, or will be completed on terms favorable to us or on terms sufficient to allow us to achieve our deleveraging strategy. Additionally, the results of operations for these hospitals we plan to divest and the potential gains or losses on the sales of those businesses may adversely affect our profitability. Moreover, we may incur asset impairment charges related to divestitures that reduce our profitability.

In addition, after entering into a definitive agreement, we may be subject to the satisfaction of pre-closing conditions as well as necessary regulatory and governmental approvals, which, if not satisfied or obtained, may prevent us from completing the sale. Dispositions may also involve continued financial exposure related to the divested business, such as through indemnities or retained obligations, that present risk to us.

Our planned divestiture activities may present financial, managerial, and operational risks. Those risks include diversion of management attention from improving existing operations; additional restructuring charges and the related impact from separating personnel, renegotiating contracts, and restructuring financial and other systems; adverse effects on existing business relationships with patients and third-party payors; and the potential that the collectability of any patient accounts receivable retained from any divested hospital may be adversely impacted. Any of these factors could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

State efforts to regulate the construction, acquisition or expansion of healthcare facilities could limit our ability to build or acquire additional healthcare facilities, renovate our facilities or expand the breadth of services we offer.

Some states in which we operate require a CON or other prior approval for the construction or acquisition of healthcare facilities, capital expenditures exceeding a prescribed amount, changes in bed capacity or services and some other matters. In evaluating a proposal, these states consider the need for additional or expanded healthcare facilities or services. If we are not able to obtain required CONs or other prior approvals, we would not be able to acquire, operate, replace or expand our facilities or expand the breadth of services we offer. Furthermore, if a CON or other prior approval upon which we relied to invest in construction of a replacement or expanded facility were to be revoked or lost through an appeal process, we may not be able to recover the value of our investment.

State efforts to regulate the sale of hospitals operated by municipal or not-for-profit entities could prevent us from acquiring these types of hospitals.

Many states have adopted legislation regarding the sale or other disposition of hospitals operated by municipal or not-for-profit entities. In some states that do not have specific legislation, the attorneys general have demonstrated an interest in these transactions under their general obligation to protect the use of charitable assets.

These legislative and administrative efforts focus primarily on the appropriate valuation of the assets divested and the use of the proceeds of the sale by the non-profit seller. While these review and, in some instances, approval processes can add additional time to the closing of a hospital acquisition, we have not had any significant difficulties or delays in completing acquisitions. However, future state actions could seriously delay or even prevent our ability to acquire hospitals once we return to our acquisition strategy.

If we are unable to effectively compete for patients, local residents could use other hospitals and healthcare providers.

The healthcare industry is highly competitive among hospitals and other healthcare providers for patients, affiliations with physicians and acquisitions. The competition among hospitals and other healthcare providers for patients has intensified in recent years. However, the majority of our hospitals are located in non-urban service areas where we believe we are the sole provider of general acute care health services. As a result, the most significant competition our hospitals face typically comes from hospitals outside of our primary service areas, including hospitals in urban areas that provide more complex services. Patients in our primary service areas may travel to these other hospitals because of physician referrals or their need for services we do not offer, among other reasons. Patients who receive services from these other hospitals may subsequently shift their preferences to those hospitals for the services we provide. Competition for patients is also increasing among other healthcare providers, including outpatient surgery, orthopedic, oncology and diagnostic centers. Our hospitals and our competitors are implementing physician alignment strategies, such as acquiring physician practice groups, employing physicians and participating in ACOs or other clinical integration models, which may impact our competitive position.

At December 31, 2016, 59 of our hospitals competed with more than one other hospital in their respective primary service areas. In most markets in which we are not the sole provider of general acute care health services, our primary competitor is a municipal or not-for-profit hospital. These hospitals are owned by tax-supported governmental agencies or not-for-profit entities supported by endowments and charitable contributions. They do not pay income or property taxes, and can make capital expenditures without paying sales tax. These financial advantages may better position these hospitals to maintain more modern and technologically upgraded facilities and equipment and offer services more specialized than those available at our hospitals. If our competitors are better able to attract patients with these offerings, we may experience an overall decline in patient volume.

Trends toward clinical transparency and value-based purchasing may have an unanticipated impact on our competitive position and patient volumes. The CMS Hospital Compare website makes available to the public certain data that hospitals submit in connection with Medicare reimbursement claims, including performance data related to quality measures and patient satisfaction surveys. Federal law provides for the future expansion of the number of quality measures that must be reported. Further, every hospital must establish and update annually a public listing of the hospital’s standard charges for items and services or publish its policies for allowing the public to view a list of these charges in response to an inquiry. If any of our hospitals achieve poor results (or results that are lower than our competitors) on these quality measures or on patient satisfaction surveys, or if our standard charges are higher than our competitors, we may attract fewer patients.

We expect these competitive trends to continue. If we are unable to compete effectively with other hospitals and other healthcare providers, local residents may seek healthcare services at providers other than our hospitals and affiliated businesses.

The failure to obtain our medical supplies at favorable prices could cause our operating results to decline.

We have a participation agreement with HealthTrust, a GPO. The current term of this agreement expires in January 2018, with automatic renewal terms of one year unless either party terminates by giving notice of non-renewal. GPOs attempt to obtain favorable pricing on medical supplies with manufacturers and vendors, sometimes by negotiating exclusive supply arrangements in exchange for discounts. To the extent these exclusive

supply arrangements are challenged or deemed unenforceable, we could incur higher costs for our medical supplies obtained through HealthTrust. Further, costs of supplies and drugs may continue to increase due to market pressure from pharmaceutical companies and new product releases. Higher costs could continue to adversely impact our operating results. Also, there can be no assurance that our arrangement with HealthTrust will provide the discounts we expect to achieve.

If the fair value of our reporting units declines, a material non-cash charge to earnings from impairment of our goodwill could result.

At December 31, 2016, we had approximately $6.5 billion of goodwill recorded on our books. We expect to recover the carrying value of this goodwill through our future cash flows. On an ongoing basis, under GAAP, we evaluate, based on the fair value of our reporting units, whether the carrying value of our goodwill is impaired when events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying value may not be recoverable. GAAP requires us to test goodwill for impairment at least annually.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, we identified certain indicators of impairment requiring an interim goodwill impairment evaluation. Those indicators were primarily the decline in our market capitalization and fair value of long-term debt during the three months ended June 30, 2016, and a decline in our projected future earnings compared to our most recent annual evaluation. We performed an estimated calculation of fair value in step one of the impairment test at June 30, 2016, which indicated that the carrying value of our hospital operations reporting unit exceeded its fair value, which calculation was updated during the three months ended September 30, 2016. In addition, a step two calculation was performed to determine the implied value of goodwill in a hypothetical purchase price allocation. Based on these analyses, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $1.395 billion to goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2016 based on the fair value and resulting implied goodwill at that time.

We performed our annual goodwill evaluation during the fourth quarter of 2016. While no impairment was indicated by this evaluation, the reduction in our fair value and the resulting goodwill impairment charge recorded during 2016 reduced the excess of fair value calculated in the step two analysis over the carrying value of our hospital operations reporting unit to an amount less than 1% of our carrying value. This minimal amount in the excess fair value over carrying value of our hospital operations reporting unit increases the risk that future declines in fair value could result in goodwill impairment.

The testing of goodwill for impairment requires us to make significant estimates about our future performance and cash flows, as well as other assumptions related to our cost of capital and other factors impacting our fair value models. These estimates can be affected by various factors, including changes in economic, industry or other market assumptions, changes in our business operations, estimates of future revenue and expenses, estimated marked multiples, expected capital expenditures, potential changes in our stock price and market capitalization, and the fair value of our long-term debt. Changes in these factors, or changes in our actual performance compared with our estimates of future projections, could affect our calculation of the fair value of our reporting units, which could result in a material impairment charge to goodwill and a material non-cash charge to earnings during the period in which the impairment is determined.

A significant decline in operating results or other indicators of impairment at one or more of our facilities could result in a material, non-cash charge to earnings to impair the value of long-lived assets.

Our operations are capital intensive and require significant investment in long-lived assets, such as property, equipment and other long-lived intangible assets, including capitalized internal-use software. If one of our facilities experiences declining operating results or is adversely impacted by one or more of these risk factors, we may not be able to recover the carrying value of those assets through our future operating cash flows. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate whether changes in future undiscounted cash flows reflect an impairment in the fair value of our long-lived assets. If the carrying value of our long-lived assets is impaired, we may incur a material non-cash charge to earnings.

We are unable to predict the ultimate impact of the Affordable Care Act, and our business may be adversely affected if the Affordable Care Act is repealed entirely or if provisions benefitting our operations are significantly modified.

In recent years, the U.S. Congress and certain state legislatures have introduced and passed a large number of proposals and legislation designed to make major changes in the healthcare system, including changes that increased access to health insurance. The most prominent of these efforts, the Affordable Care Act, affects how healthcare services are covered, delivered, and reimbursed. As currently structured, the Affordable Care Act mandates that substantially all U.S. citizens maintain health insurance coverage, expands health insurance coverage through a combination of public program expansion and private sector health insurance reforms, reduces Medicare reimbursement to hospitals, and promotes value-based purchasing. There are currently several public and private initiatives that aim to transition payment models from passive volume-based reimbursement to models that are tied to the quality and value of services.

The 2016 federal elections resulted in a new administration that, along with certain members of Congress, have stated their intent to repeal or make significant changes to the Affordable Care Act, its implementation and/or its interpretation. There is uncertainty regarding whether, when, and how the Affordable Care Act will be changed, what alternative provisions, if any, will be enacted, the timing of enactment and implementation of alternative provisions, and the impact of alternative provisions on providers as well as other healthcare industry participants. In addition, a presidential executive order has been signed that directs agencies to minimize “economic and regulatory burdens” of the Affordable Care Act, but it is unclear how this will be implemented. Further, Congress could eliminate or alter provisions beneficial to us while leaving in place provisions reducing our reimbursement. Government efforts to repeal or change the Affordable Care Act may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flow, capital resources and liquidity.

If reimbursement rates paid by federal or state healthcare programs or commercial payors are reduced, if we are unable to maintain favorable contract terms with payors or comply with our payor contract obligations, if insured individuals move to insurance plans with greater coverage exclusions or narrower networks, or if insurance coverage is otherwise restricted, our net operating revenues may decline.

In 2016, 34.4% of our operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before the provision for bad debts), came from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Federal healthcare expenditures continue to increase and state governments continue to face budgetary shortfalls as a result of current economic conditions and increasing Medicaid enrollment. As a result of such events and also pursuant to the Affordable Care Act, federal and state governments have made, and continue to make, significant changes in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, including reductions in reimbursement levels and supplemental payment programs like disproportionate share payments. Some of these changes have decreased, or could decrease, the amount of money we receive for our services relating to these programs.

In addition, government and commercial payors as well as other third parties from whom we receive payment for our services attempt to control healthcare costs by, for example, requiring hospitals to discount payments for their services in exchange for exclusive or preferred participation in their benefit plans, restricting coverage through utilization review, reducing coverage of inpatient services and shifting care to outpatient settings, requiring prior authorizations, and implementing alternative payment models. The ability of commercial payors to control healthcare costs using these measures may be enhanced by the increasing consolidation of insurance and managed care companies.

In 2016, 53.4% of our operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before the provision for bad debts), came from commercial payors. Our contracts with payors require us to comply with a number of terms related to the provision of services and billing for services. If we are unable to negotiate increased reimbursement rates, maintain existing rates or other favorable contract terms, effectively respond to payor cost controls or comply with the terms of our payor contracts, the payments we receive for our services may be reduced or we may be involved in disputes with payors and experience payment denials, both

prospectively and retroactively. In addition, some individuals may move from existing coverage under health insurance plans with higher reimbursement rates for our services and lower co-pays and deductibles to plans, such as those purchased on the health insurance exchanges, that may provide for lower reimbursement for our services along with higher co-pays and deductibles or even exclusion of our hospitals and employed physicians from coverage.

The demand for services provided by our hospitals can be impacted by factors beyond our control.

Our admissions and adjusted admissions as well as acuity trends may be impacted by factors beyond our control. For example, seasonal fluctuations in the severity of influenza and other critical illnesses, unplanned shutdowns or unavailability of our facilities due to weather or other unforeseen events, decreases in trends in high acuity service offerings, changes in competition from outside service providers, turnover in physicians affiliated with our hospitals, or changes in medical technology can have an impact on the demand for services at our hospitals. The impact of these or other factors beyond our control could have an adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.

We may be adversely affected by consolidation among health insurers.

In recent years, a number of health insurers have merged or increased efforts to consolidate with other payors as well as providers, in part, as a result of the insurance industry challenges resulting from the Affordable Care Act. Our ability to negotiate prices and favorable terms with health insurers in certain markets could be affected negatively as a result of this consolidation. Also, the shift toward value-based payment models could be accelerated if larger insurers find these models to be financially beneficial. We cannot predict whether we will be able to respond effectively to the impact of increased consolidation in the payor industry.

If we fail to comply with extensive laws and government regulations, including fraud and abuse laws, we could suffer penalties or be required to make significant changes to our operations.

The healthcare industry is governed by laws and regulations at the federal, state and local government levels. These laws and regulations include standards addressing, among other issues, the adequacy of medical care, equipment, personnel, operating policies and procedures; billing and coding for services; properly handling overpayments; classification of levels of care provided; preparing and filing of cost reports; relationships with referral sources and referral recipients; maintenance of adequate records; compliance with building codes; environmental protection; and privacy and security. Examples of these laws include, but are not limited to, HIPAA, the Stark Law, the federal anti-kickback statute, the FCA, the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act and similar state laws. If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations we could suffer civil sanctions and criminal penalties, including the loss of our operating licenses and our ability to participate in the Medicare, Medicaid and other federal and state healthcare programs.

In addition, there are heightened coordinated civil and criminal enforcement efforts by both federal and state government agencies relating to the healthcare industry, including the hospital segment. Recent enforcement actions have focused on financial arrangements between hospitals and physicians, billing for services without adequately documenting medical necessity and billing for services outside the coverage guidelines for such services. Specific to our hospitals, we have received inquiries and subpoenas from various governmental agencies regarding these and other matters, and we are also subject to various claims and lawsuits relating to such matters. For a further discussion of these matters, see “Legal Proceedings” in Part I, Item 3 of this Form 10-K.

In the future, evolving interpretations or enforcement of these laws and regulations could subject our current practices to allegations of impropriety or illegality or could require us to make changes in our facilities, equipment, personnel, services, capital expenditure programs and operating expenses.

If we become subject to significant legal actions, we could be subject to substantial uninsured liabilities or increased insurance costs.

Physicians, hospitals and other healthcare providers have become subject to an increasing number of legal actions alleging malpractice, product liability, or related legal theories. Even in states that have imposed caps on damages, litigants are seeking recoveries under new theories of liability that might not be subject to the caps on damages. Many of these actions involve large claims and significant defense costs. To protect us from the cost of these claims, we maintain claims made professional malpractice liability insurance and general liability insurance coverage in excess of those amounts for which we are self-insured. This insurance coverage is in amounts that we believe to be sufficient for our operations; however, our insurance coverage may not continue to be available at a reasonable cost for us to maintain adequate levels of insurance. Additionally, our insurance coverage does not cover all claims against us, such as fines, penalties, or other damage and legal expense payments resulting from qui tam lawsuits.

We could be subject to increased monetary penalties and/or other sanctions, including exclusion from federal health care programs, if we fail to comply with the terms of the Corporate Integrity Agreement.

On August 4, 2014, we announced that we had entered into a civil settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice, other federal agencies and identified relators that concluded previously announced investigations and litigation related to short stay admissions through emergency departments at certain of our affiliated hospitals. See our discussion of this matter under the section “Business of Community Health Systems, Inc.” in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K and “Legal Proceedings” in Part II, Item 1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014 for further discussion of the background of this matter and details of the settlement. In addition to the amounts paid in the settlement, we executed the CIA with the OIG that has been incorporated into our existing and comprehensive compliance program.

Material, uncorrected violations of the CIA could lead to our suspension or disbarment from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal and state healthcare programs and repayment obligations. In addition, we are subject to possible civil penalties for failure to substantially comply with the terms of the CIA, including stipulated penalties ranging between $1,000 to $2,500 per day. We are also subject to a stipulated penalty of $50,000 for each false certification made by us or on our behalf, pursuant to the reporting provisions of the CIA. The CIA increases the amount of information we must provide to the federal government regarding our healthcare practices and our compliance with federal regulations. The reports we provide in connection with the CIA could result in greater scrutiny by regulatory authorities.

If we experience growth in self-pay volume and revenues, or if we experience deterioration in the collectability of patient responsibility accounts, our financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our primary collection risks relate to uninsured patients and outstanding patient balances for which the primary insurance payor has paid some but not all of the outstanding balance, with the remaining outstanding balance (generally deductibles and co-payments) owed by the patient. Collections are impacted by the economic ability of patients to pay and the effectiveness of our collection efforts. Significant changes in payor mix, business office operations, economic conditions or trends in federal and state governmental healthcare coverage may affect our collection of accounts receivable and are considered in our estimates of accounts receivable collectability.

Since the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, our self-pay revenues as a percentage of total revenue have decreased, primarily resulting from a shift from self-pay to Medicaid and private insurers for a portion of our patient population, driven by the insurance coverage expansion provisions of the Affordable Care Act. However, the outcome of the 2016 federal elections has cast considerable uncertainty on the future of the Affordable Care Act. In addition, it is difficult to predict the ultimate impact of the Affordable Care Act on the uninsured population and the percentage of our total revenue comprised of self-pay revenues because of, among other variables, uncertainty regarding the number and identity of states that ultimately choose to expand

Medicaid and the number of uninsured who elect to purchase health insurance. Moreover, we may still be adversely affected by the growth in patient responsibility accounts as a result of increases in the adoption of plan structures, including health savings accounts, narrow networks and tiered networks, which shift greater responsibility for care to individuals through greater exclusions and copayment and deductible amounts. Further, our ability to collect patient responsibility accounts may be limited by statutory, regulatory and investigatory initiatives, including private lawsuits directed at hospital charges and collection practices for uninsured and underinsured patients. In addition, a deterioration of economic conditions in the United States could potentially lead to higher levels of uninsured patients, result in higher levels of patients covered by lower paying government programs, result in fiscal uncertainties at both government payors and private insurers and/or limit the economic ability of patients to make payments for which they are responsible. If we experience growth in self-pay volume or deterioration in collectability of patient responsibility accounts, our financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.

Many of the non-urban communities in which we operate continue to face challenging economic conditions, and the failure of certain employers, or the closure of certain manufacturing and other facilities in our markets, could have a disproportionate impact on our hospitals.

While the U.S. economy as a whole has improved, improvement in many of the non-urban communities in which we operate has lagged behind the larger urban communities. In addition, the economies in the non-urban communities in which our hospitals primarily operate are often dependent on a small number of large employers, especially manufacturing or other facilities. These employers often provide income and health insurance for a disproportionately large number of community residents who may depend on our hospitals for care. The failure of one or more large employers, or the closure or substantial reduction in the number of individuals employed at manufacturing or other facilities located in or near many of the non-urban communities in which our hospitals primarily operate, could cause affected employees to move elsewhere for employment or lose insurance coverage that was otherwise available to them. When patients are experiencing personal financial difficulties or have concerns about general economic conditions, they may:

•

delay or forgo elective procedures;

•

purchase a high-deductible insurance plan or no insurance at all, which increases a hospital’s dependence on self-pay revenue; or

•

choose to seek care in emergency rooms.

The occurrence of these events may cause a reduction in our revenues and adversely impact our results of operations.

If there are delays in regulatory updates by governmental entities to federal and state healthcare programs, we may experience increased volatility in our operating results as such delays may result in a timing difference between when such program revenues are earned and when they become known or estimable for purposes of accounting recognition.

We derive a significant amount of our net operating revenues from governmental healthcare programs, primarily Medicare and Medicaid. The reimbursements due to us from those programs are subject to legislative and regulatory changes that can have a significant impact on our operating results. When delays occur in the implementation of regulations or passage of legislation, there is the potential for material increases or decreases in operating revenues to be recognized in periods subsequent to when such related services were performed, resulting in the potential for an adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations.

If our adoption and utilization of electronic health record systems fails to achieve the required measures for meaningful use, our consolidated results of operations could be adversely affected.

As a result of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH, eligible hospitals and healthcare professionals can receive incentive payments for their adoption and meaningful use of

EHR technology. The incentive payments are available for a maximum period of five or six years, depending on the program. The implementation of EHR technology that meets the meaningful use criteria requires a significant capital investment, and we have and intend to continue to offset some of these costs by maximizing our receipt of incentive payments. Eligible hospitals and professionals that fail to demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology and have not applied and qualified for a hardship exception are subject to reduced reimbursement from Medicare. Thus, if our hospitals and employed professionals are unable to comply with the meaningful use standards, we will not be eligible to receive incentive payments that could offset some of the costs of implementing EHR systems (to the extent incentive payments remain available), and we could be subject to penalties that may have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations.

A cyber-attack or security breach could cause a loss of confidential data, give rise to remediation and other expenses, expose us to liability under HIPAA, consumer protection laws, common law or other theories, subject us to litigation and federal and state governmental inquiries, damage our reputation, and otherwise be disruptive to our business.

We rely extensively on our computer systems to manage clinical and financial data, communicate with our patients, payors, vendors and other third parties and summarize and analyze operating results. We have made significant investments in technology to protect our systems and information from cybersecurity risks. During the second quarter of 2014, our computer network was the target of an external, criminal cyber-attack in which the attacker successfully copied and transferred certain data outside the Company. This data included certain non-medical patient identification data (such as patient names, addresses, birthdates, telephone numbers and social security numbers) considered protected under HIPAA, but did not include patient credit card, medical or clinical information. The remediation efforts in response to the attack have been substantial, including continued development and enhancement of our controls, processes and practices designed to protect our systems, computers, software, data and networks from attack, damage or unauthorized access. Also in connection with the cyber-attack, we have been subject to multiple purported class action lawsuits and may be subject to additional litigation, potential governmental inquiries and potential reputation damages.

In spite of our security measures, there can be no assurance that we will not be subject to additional cyber-attacks or security breaches in the future. Such attacks or breaches could result in loss of protected health information or other data subject to privacy laws or disrupt our information technology systems or business. Additionally, growing cyber-security threats related to the use of ransomware and other malicious software threaten the access and utilization of critical information technology and data. We continue to prioritize cybersecurity and the development of practices and controls to protect our systems. Our ability to recover from a ransomware or other cyber-attack is dependent on these practices, including successful backup systems and other recovery procedures. As cyber-threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities. If we are subject to cyber-attacks or security breaches in the future, this could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

A pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of a contagious disease in the markets in which we operate or that otherwise impacts our facilities could adversely impact our business.

If a pandemic or other public health crisis were to affect our markets, our business could be adversely affected. Such a crisis could diminish the public trust in healthcare facilities, especially hospitals that fail to accurately or timely diagnose, or that are treating (or have treated) patients affected by contagious diseases. If any of our facilities were involved in treating patients for such a contagious disease, other patients might cancel elective procedures or fail to seek needed care at our facilities. Further, a pandemic might adversely impact our business by causing a temporary shutdown or diversion of patients, by disrupting or delaying production and delivery of materials and products in the supply chain or by causing staffing shortages in our facilities. Although we have disaster plans in place and operate pursuant to infectious disease protocols, the potential impact of a pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of a contagious disease with respect to our markets or our facilities is difficult to predict and could adversely impact our business.

Our performance depends on our ability to recruit and retain quality physicians.

Although we employ some physicians, physicians are often not employees at our healthcare facilities at which they practice. The success of our healthcare facilities depends in part on the number and quality of the physicians on the medical staffs of our healthcare facilities, our ability to employ quality physicians, the admitting and utilization practices of employed and independent physicians, maintaining good relations with those physicians and controlling costs related to the employment of physicians. In many of the markets we serve, many physicians have admitting privileges at other healthcare facilities in addition to our healthcare facilities. Such physicians may terminate their affiliation with or employment by our healthcare facilities at any time. If we are unable to provide adequate support personnel or technologically advanced equipment and facilities that meet the needs of those physicians and their patients, they may be discouraged from referring patients to our facilities, admissions may decrease and our operating performance may decline.

Our labor costs could be adversely affected by competition for staffing, the shortage of experienced nurses and labor union activity.

In addition to our physicians, the operations of our hospitals are dependent on the efforts, abilities and experience of our management and medical support personnel, such as nurses, pharmacists and lab technicians. We compete with other healthcare providers in recruiting and retaining qualified management and support personnel responsible for the daily operations of our hospitals, including nurses and other non-physician healthcare professionals. In some markets, the availability of nurses and other medical support personnel has been a significant operating issue to healthcare providers. We may be required to continue to enhance wages and benefits to recruit and retain nurses and other medical support personnel or to hire more expensive temporary or contract personnel. In addition, the states in which we operate could adopt mandatory nurse-staffing ratios or could reduce mandatory nurse-staffing ratios already in place. State-mandated nurse-staffing ratios could significantly affect labor costs and have an adverse impact on revenues if we are required to limit admissions in order to meet the required ratios.

Increased or ongoing labor union activity is another factor that could adversely affect our labor costs or otherwise adversely impact us. To the extent a significant portion of our employee base unionizes, our labor costs could increase significantly. In addition, when negotiating collective bargaining agreements with unions, whether such agreements are renewals or first contracts, there is the possibility that strikes could occur during the negotiation process, and our continued operation during any strikes could increase our labor costs and otherwise adversely impact us.

If our labor costs increase, we may not be able to raise rates to offset these increased costs. Because a significant percentage of our revenues consists of fixed, prospective payments, our ability to pass along increased labor costs is constrained. In the event we are not entirely effective at recruiting and retaining qualified management, nurses and other medical support personnel, or in controlling labor costs, this could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

The industry trend towards value-based purchasing may negatively impact our revenues.

The trend toward value-based purchasing of healthcare services is gaining momentum across the healthcare industry among both government and commercial payors. Generally, value-based purchasing initiatives tie payment to the quality and efficiency of care. For example, hospital payments may be negatively impacted by the occurrence of HACs. The 25% of hospitals with the worst national risk-adjusted HAC rates for all hospitals in the previous year receive a 1% reduction in their total Medicare payments. Medicare does not reimburse for care related to HACs. In addition, federal funds may not be used under the Medicaid program to reimburse providers for services provided to treat HACs. Hospitals that experience excess readmissions for designated conditions receive reduced payments for all inpatient discharges. HHS also reduces Medicare inpatient hospital payments for all discharges by a required percentage and pools the amount collected from these reductions to fund payments to reward hospitals that meet or exceed certain quality performance standards. Further, Medicare and Medicaid require hospitals to report certain quality data to receive full reimbursement updates.

HHS has indicated that it is particularly focused on tying Medicare payments to quality or value through alternative payment models, which generally aim to make providers attentive to the quality and cost of care they deliver to patients. Examples of alternative payment models include ACOs and bundled payment arrangements. HHS currently requires hospitals in certain geographic areas to participate in a bundled payment program for specified joint replacement procedures and will implement a mandatory program with a cardiac focus in 2017. HHS may increasingly establish similar mandatory programs. It is unclear whether alternative payment models will successfully coordinate care and reduce costs or whether they will decrease aggregate reimbursement. Several of the nation’s largest commercial payors have also expressed an intent to increase reliance on value-based reimbursement arrangements. Further, many large commercial payors require hospitals to report quality data, and several commercial payors do not reimburse hospitals for certain preventable adverse events.

We expect value-based purchasing programs, including programs that condition reimbursement on patient outcome measures, to become more common and to involve a higher percentage of reimbursement amounts. We are unable at this time to predict how this trend will affect our results of operations, but it could negatively impact our revenues or our cost of operations, or both.

Our revenues are somewhat concentrated in a small number of states which will make us particularly sensitive to regulatory and economic changes in those states.

Our revenues are particularly sensitive to regulatory and economic changes in states in which we generate a significant portion of our revenues, including Florida, Pennsylvania, Texas, Indiana and Tennessee. Accordingly, any change in the current demographic, economic, competitive or regulatory conditions in these states could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Changes to the Medicaid programs in these states could also have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. For example, the Texas Medicaid Waiver Program provides funding for uncompensated care and delivery system reform initiatives and allows Texas to continue receiving supplemental Medicaid reimbursement while expanding its Medicaid managed care program. CMS has extended the waiver through December 31, 2017. Texas has submitted an application to extend its Medicaid Waiver Program through September 30, 2019, but CMS has not yet issued a decision. We cannot predict whether the Texas Medicaid Waiver Program will be extended, continue in its current form or guarantee that revenues recognized from the program will not decrease.

In addition, some of our hospitals in Florida, Texas and other areas along the Gulf Coast are located in hurricane-prone areas. In the past, hurricanes have had a disruptive effect on the operations of our hospitals in Florida, Texas and other coastal states and the patient populations in those states. Our business activities could be harmed by a particularly active hurricane season or even a single storm, and the property insurance we obtain may not be adequate to cover losses from future hurricanes or other natural disasters.

The Company’s Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement could delay or prevent a change in control of the Company, which could have a negative effect on the price of the Company’s common stock.

The Board of Directors of the Company adopted a Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement on October 3, 2016. Under the terms of the Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement, any person (together with certain affiliated persons) that acquires 15% or more of the Company’s common stock could suffer substantial dilution of its ownership interest in the Company through the issuance of a large amount of stock to shareholders other than the acquiring person.

Our Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement was adopted in order to prevent the accumulation of a potentially controlling block of the Company’s common stock pending our exploration of potential strategic options and alternatives. However, our Stockholders Protection Rights Agreement may impede an attempt to acquire a significant or controlling ownership interest in the Company, and may prevent or make more difficult takeovers or unsolicited corporate transactions involving the Company not supported by our Board of Directors, even if such a transaction were considered beneficial by some of our stockholders. The Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement will expire on April 1, 2017.

There can be no assurance that our exploration of strategic alternatives will result in any transaction, and exploration of strategic alternatives may impact our ability to pursue other opportunities.

As initially disclosed on September 19, 2016, with the assistance of advisors, we are exploring a variety of options with financial sponsors, as well as other potential alternatives. These discussions are ongoing. There can be no certainty that the exploration will result in any kind of transaction. We do not expect to make further public comment regarding these matters while the exploration takes place unless and until we otherwise deem further public comment is appropriate or required. In addition, the process of exploring strategic alternatives has involved and may continue to involve the dedication of significant resources, including the time and attention of our management, and the incurrence of significant costs and expenses. Moreover, uncertainty regarding the possible outcome of our exploration of strategic alternatives may increase the challenge of recruiting and retaining talented and skilled personnel. It is also possible that potentially inaccurate market speculation regarding the outcome of the process may cause our stock to trade based on factors other than our financial and operating performance and prospects as a stand-alone company.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None

Item 2. Properties

Corporate Headquarters

We own our corporate headquarters building located in Franklin, Tennessee.

Hospitals

Our hospitals are general care hospitals offering a wide range of inpatient and outpatient medical services. These services generally include general acute care, emergency room, general and specialty surgery, critical care, internal medicine, obstetrics, diagnostic, psychiatric and rehabilitation services. In addition, some of our hospitals provide skilled nursing and home care services based on individual community needs.

For each of our hospitals owned or leased as of December 31, 2016, the following table shows its location, the date of its acquisition or lease inception and the number of licensed beds:

Hospital

City

Licensed
Beds(1)

Date of
Acquisition/Lease
Inception

Ownership
Type

Alabama

South Baldwin Regional Medical Center

Foley

112

June, 2000

Leased

Grandview Medical Center

Birmingham

372

July, 2007

Owned

Flowers Hospital

Dothan

235

July, 2007

Owned

Medical Center Enterprise

Enterprise

131

July, 2007

Owned

Gadsden Regional Medical Center

Gadsden

346

July, 2007

Owned

Crestwood Medical Center

Huntsville

180

July, 2007

Owned

Stringfellow Memorial Hospital

Anniston

125

January, 2014

Leased

Alaska

Mat-Su Regional Medical Center

Palmer

July, 2007

Owned

Arizona

Western Arizona Regional Medical Center

Bullhead City

139

July, 2000

Owned

Northwest Medical Center

Tucson

300

July, 2007

Owned

Oro Valley Hospital

Oro Valley

146

July, 2007

Owned

Hospital

City

Licensed
Beds(1)

Date of
Acquisition/Lease
Inception

Ownership
Type

Arkansas

Northwest Health System

Northwest Medical Center - Bentonville

Bentonville

128

July, 2007

Owned

Northwest Medical Center - Springdale

Springdale

222

July, 2007

Owned

Willow Creek Women’s Hospital

Johnson

July, 2007

Owned

Northwest Health Physician’s Specialty Hospital

Fayetteville

April, 2016

Leased

Siloam Springs Regional Hospital

Siloam Springs

February, 2009

Owned

Medical Center of South Arkansas

El Dorado

166

April, 2009

Leased

Sparks Regional Medical Center

Fort Smith

492

January, 2014

Owned

Sparks Medical Center - Van Buren

Van Buren

103

January, 2014

Leased

Florida

Lake Wales Medical Center

Lake Wales

160

December, 2002

Owned

North Okaloosa Medical Center

Crestview

110

March, 1996

Owned

Bayfront Health Brooksville

Brooksville

120

January, 2014

Leased

Bayfront Health Dade City

Dade City

120

January, 2014

Owned

Bayfront Health Port Charlotte

Port Charlotte

254

January, 2014

Owned

Bayfront Health Punta Gorda

Punta Gorda

208

January, 2014

Owned

Bayfront Health St. Petersburg

St. Petersburg

480

January, 2014

Leased

Bayfront Health Spring Hill

Spring Hill

124

January, 2014

Leased

Heart of Florida Regional Medical Center

Davenport

193

January, 2014

Owned

Highlands Regional Medical Center

Sebring

126

January, 2014

Leased

Lower Keys Medical Center

Key West

167

January, 2014

Leased

Physicians Regional Healthcare System - Collier

Naples

100

January, 2014

Owned

Physicians Regional Healthcare System - Pine Ridge

Naples

101

January, 2014

Owned

Santa Rosa Medical Center

Milton

129

January, 2014

Leased

Sebastian River Medical Center

Sebastian

154

January, 2014

Owned

Seven Rivers Regional Medical Center

Crystal River

128

January, 2014

Owned

Shands Lake Shore Regional Medical Center

Lake City

January, 2014

Leased

Shands Live Oak Regional Medical Center

Live Oak

January, 2014

Owned

Shands Starke Regional Medical Center

Starke

January, 2014

Owned

St. Cloud Regional Medical Center

St. Cloud

January, 2014

Owned

Venice Regional Bayfront Health

Venice

312

January, 2014

Owned

Wuesthoff Health System - Melbourne

Melbourne

119

January, 2014

Owned

Wuesthoff Health System - Rockledge

Rockledge

298

January, 2014

Owned

Munroe Regional Medical Center

Ocala

421

April, 2014

Leased

Georgia

East Georgia Regional Medical Center

Statesboro

149

January, 2014

Owned

Hospital

City

Licensed
Beds(1)

Date of
Acquisition/Lease
Inception

Ownership
Type

Indiana

Porter Hospital

Valparaiso

301

May, 2007

Owned

Lutheran Health Network

Bluffton Regional Medical Center

Bluffton

July, 2007

Owned

Dupont Hospital

Fort Wayne

131

July, 2007

Owned

Lutheran Hospital

Fort Wayne

396

July, 2007

Owned

Lutheran Musculoskeletal Center

Fort Wayne

July, 2007

Owned

Lutheran Rehabilitation Hospital (rehabilitation)

Fort Wayne

July, 2007

Owned

St. Joseph’s Hospital

Fort Wayne

191

July, 2007

Owned

Dukes Memorial Hospital

Peru

July, 2007

Owned

Kosciusko Community Hospital

Warsaw

July, 2007

Owned

La Porte Hospital

La Porte

227

March, 2016

Owned

Starke Hospital

Knox

March, 2016

Leased

Louisiana

Byrd Regional Hospital

Leesville

October, 1994

Owned

Northern Louisiana Medical Center

Ruston

171

April, 2007

Owned

Lake Area Medical Center

Lake Charles

July, 2007

Owned

Mississippi

Merit Health Wesley

Hattiesburg

211

July, 2007

Owned

Merit Health River Region

Vicksburg

341

July, 2007

Owned

Merit Health Biloxi

Biloxi

198

January, 2014

Leased

Merit Health Central

Jackson

462

January, 2014

Leased

Merit Health Rankin

Brandon

134

January, 2014

Leased

Merit Health Gilmore Memorial

Amory

January, 2014

Owned

Merit Health Madison

Canton

January, 2014

Owned

Merit Health Northwest Mississippi

Clarksdale

181

January, 2014

Leased

Merit Health River Oaks

Flowood

160

January, 2014

Owned

Merit Health Batesville

Batesville

112

January, 2014

Owned

Merit Health Woman’s Hospital

Flowood

109

January, 2014

Owned

Merit Health Natchez

Natchez

179

October, 2014

Owned

Missouri

Moberly Regional Medical Center

Moberly

101

November, 1993

Owned

Northeast Regional Medical Center

Kirksville

December, 2000

Leased

Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center

Poplar Bluff

442

January, 2014

Owned

Twin Rivers Regional Medical Center

Kennett

116

January, 2014

Owned

New Jersey

Memorial Hospital of Salem County

Salem

126

September, 2002

Owned

New Mexico

Eastern New Mexico Medical Center

Roswell

162

April, 1998

Owned

Carlsbad Medical Center

Carlsbad

115

July, 2007

Owned

Lea Regional Medical Center

Hobbs

202

July, 2007

Owned

Mountain View Regional Medical Center

Las Cruces

168

July, 2007

Owned

Hospital

City

Licensed
Beds(1)

Date of
Acquisition/Lease
Inception

Ownership
Type

North Carolina

Lake Norman Regional Medical Center

Mooresville

123

January, 2014

Owned

Davis Regional Medical Center

Statesville

130

January, 2014

Owned

Ohio

Valleycare System of Ohio

Northside Medical Center

Youngstown

355

October, 2010

Owned

Trumbull Memorial Hospital

Warren

311

October, 2010

Owned

Hillside Rehabilitation Hospital (rehabilitation)

Warren

October, 2010

Owned

Oklahoma

AllianceHealth Ponca City

Ponca City

140

May, 2006

Owned

AllianceHealth Deaconess

Oklahoma City

238

July, 2007

Owned

AllianceHealth Woodward

Woodward

July, 2007

Leased

AllianceHealth Clinton

Clinton

January, 2014

Leased

AllianceHealth Madill

Madill

January, 2014

Leased

AllianceHealth Pryor

Pryor

January, 2014

Leased

AllianceHealth Durant

Durant

148

January, 2014

Owned

AllianceHealth Midwest

Midwest City

255

January, 2014

Leased

AllianceHealth Seminole

Seminole

January, 2014

Leased

Pennsylvania

Commonwealth Health Network

Berwick Hospital

Berwick

101

March, 1999

Owned

Wilkes-Barre General Hospital

Wilkes-Barre

412

April, 2009

Owned

First Hospital Wyoming Valley (psychiatric)

Wilkes-Barre

193

April, 2009

Owned

Regional Hospital of Scranton

Scranton

186

May, 2011

Owned

Tyler Memorial Hospital

Tunkhannock

May, 2011

Owned

Moses Taylor Hospital

Scranton

214

January, 2012

Owned

Brandywine Hospital

Coatesville

169

June, 2001

Owned

Chestnut Hill Hospital

Philadelphia

148

February, 2005

Owned

Easton Hospital

Easton

254

October, 2001

Owned

Jennersville Regional Hospital

West Grove

October, 2001

Owned

Pottstown Memorial Medical Center

Pottstown

232

July, 2003

Owned

Phoenixville Hospital

Phoenixville

151

August, 2004

Owned

Memorial Hospital

York

100

July, 2012

Owned

Carlisle Regional Medical Center

Carlisle

165

January, 2014

Owned

Heart of Lancaster Regional Medical Center

Lititz

148

January, 2014

Owned

Lancaster Regional Medical Center

Lancaster

214

January, 2014

Owned

Sharon Regional Health System

Sharon

258

April, 2014

Owned

South Carolina

Springs Memorial Hospital

Lancaster

225

November, 1994

Owned

Mary Black Memorial Hospital

Spartanburg

207

July, 2007

Owned

Carolinas Hospital System

Florence

396

July, 2007

Owned

Carolinas Hospital System - Marion

Mullins

124

July, 2010

Owned

Chester Regional Medical Center

Chester

January, 2014

Leased

Mary Black Health System - Gaffney

Gaffney

125

November, 2014

Owned

Hospital

City

Licensed
Beds(1)

Date of
Acquisition/Lease
Inception

Ownership
Type

Tennessee

Tennova - Lakeway Regional Hospital

Morristown

135

May, 1993

Owned

Tennova - Regional Jackson

Jackson

150

January, 2003

Owned

Tennova - Dyersburg Regional

Dyersburg

225

January, 2003

Owned

Tennova - Volunteer Martin

Martin

100

January, 2003

Owned

Tennova Healthcare - Shelbyville

Shelbyville

July, 2005

Owned

Tennova Healthcare - Cleveland

Cleveland

351

October, 2005

Owned

Tennova Healthcare - Clarksville

Clarksville

270

July, 2007

Owned

Tennova Healthcare - Harton

Tullahoma

135

January, 2014

Owned

Tennova Healthcare - Jamestown

Jamestown

January, 2014

Owned

Tennova - Jefferson Memorial Hospital

Jefferson City

January, 2014

Leased

Tennova - LaFollette Medical Center

LaFollette

January, 2014

Leased

Tennova - Newport Medical Center

Newport

130

January, 2014

Owned

Tennova - North Knoxville Medical Center

Powell

108

January, 2014

Owned

Tennova - Physicians Regional Medical Center

Knoxville

401

January, 2014

Owned

Tennova - Turkey Creek Medical Center

Knoxville

101

January, 2014

Owned

Tennova Healthcare - Lebanon

Lebanon

245

January, 2014

Owned

Texas

Hill Regional Hospital

Hillsboro

116

October, 1994

Leased

Lake Granbury Medical Center

Granbury

January, 1997

Leased

South Texas Regional Medical Center

Jourdanton

November, 2001

Owned

Laredo Medical Center

Laredo

326

October, 2003

Owned

Weatherford Regional Medical Center

Weatherford

103

November, 2006

Leased

Abilene Regional Medical Center

Abilene

231

July, 2007

Owned

Brownwood Regional Medical Center

Brownwood

188

July, 2007

Owned

College Station Medical Center

College Station

167

July, 2007

Owned

Navarro Regional Hospital

Corsicana

162

July, 2007

Owned

Longview Regional Medical Center

Longview

230

July, 2007

Owned

Woodland Heights Medical Center

Lufkin

149

July, 2007

Owned

San Angelo Community Medical Center

San Angelo

171

July, 2007

Owned

DeTar Healthcare System

Victoria

304

July, 2007

Owned

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center

Cedar Park

December, 2007

Owned

Tomball Regional Medical Center

Tomball

350

October, 2011

Owned

Virginia

Southern Virginia Regional Medical Center

Emporia

March, 1999

Owned

Southampton Memorial Hospital

Franklin

105

March, 2000

Owned

Southside Regional Medical Center

Petersburg

300

August, 2003

Owned

Washington

Rockwood Health System

Deaconess Hospital

Spokane

388

October, 2008

Owned

Valley Hospital

Spokane Valley

123

October, 2008

Owned

Yakima Regional Medical and Cardiac Center

Yakima

214

January, 2014

Owned

Toppenish Community Hospital

Toppenish

January, 2014

Owned

Hospital

City

Licensed
Beds(1)

Date of
Acquisition/Lease
Inception

Ownership
Type

West Virginia

Plateau Medical Center

Oak Hill

July, 2002

Owned

Greenbrier Valley Medical Center

Ronceverte

122

July, 2007

Owned

Bluefield Regional Medical Center

Bluefield

October, 2010

Owned

Williamson Memorial Hospital

Williamson

January, 2014

Owned

Total Licensed Beds at December 31, 2016

26,476

Total Hospitals at December 31, 2016

158

(1)	Licensed beds are the number of beds for which the appropriate state agency licenses a facility regardless of whether the beds are actually available for patient use.

The real property of substantially all of our wholly-owned hospitals is also encumbered by mortgages to support obligations under our credit facility and outstanding senior secured notes.

The following table lists the hospitals owned by joint venture entities in which we do not have a consolidating ownership interest, along with our percentage ownership interest in the joint venture entity as of December 31, 2016. Information on licensed beds was provided by the majority owner and manager of each joint venture. A subsidiary of HCA Holdings, Inc. is the majority owner of Macon Healthcare LLC.


Joint Venture	Facility Name	City	State	Licensed Beds
Macon Healthcare LLC	Coliseum Medical Center (38%)	Macon	GA	250
Macon Healthcare LLC	Coliseum Psychiatric Center (38%)	Macon	GA	60
Macon Healthcare LLC	Coliseum Northside Hospital (38%)	Macon	GA	103

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we receive inquiries or subpoenas from state regulators, state Medicaid Fraud Control units, fiscal intermediaries, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Department of Justice and other government entities regarding various Medicare and Medicaid issues. In addition to the matters discussed below, we are currently responding to subpoenas and administrative demands concerning (a) certain cardiology procedures, medical records and policies at a New Mexico hospital, (b) an inquiry regarding a sleep lab at a Louisiana hospital, (c) a subpoena regarding wound care services at one of our Florida hospitals (which appears to be related to unsealed cases against Healogics, Inc.), (d) a subpoena concerning provider based billing status for hyperbaric oxygen therapy at one of our Tennessee hospitals, (e) a subpoena concerning a physician relationship at one of our Texas hospitals and (f) a civil investigative demand concerning short-term Medicaid eligibility determinations processed by third party vendors at one of our Pennsylvania hospitals. In addition, we are subject to other claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of our business including lawsuits and claims related to billing practices and the administration of charity care policies at our hospitals. Based on current knowledge, management does not believe that loss contingencies arising from pending legal, regulatory and governmental matters, including the matters described herein, will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or liquidity of the Company. However, in light of the inherent uncertainties involved in pending legal, regulatory and governmental matters, some of which are beyond our control, and the very large or indeterminate damages sought in some of these matters, an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters could be material to our results of operations or cash flows for any particular reporting period. Settlements of suits involving Medicare and Medicaid issues routinely require both monetary payments as well as corporate integrity agreements. Additionally, qui tam or “whistleblower” actions initiated under the civil False Claims Act may be pending but placed under seal by the court to comply with the False Claims Act’s requirements for filing such suits. In September 2014, the Criminal Division of the United States Department of

Justice, or DOJ, announced that all qui tam cases will be shared with their Division to determine if a parallel criminal investigation should be opened. The Criminal Division has also frequently stated an intention to pursue corporations in criminal prosecutions. From time to time, we detect issues of non-compliance with Federal healthcare laws pertaining to claims submission and reimbursement practices and/or financial relationships with physicians. We avail ourselves of various mechanisms to address potential overpayments arising out of these issues, including repayment of claims, rebilling of claims, and participation in voluntary disclosure protocols offered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Office of the Inspector General. Participating in voluntary repayments and voluntary disclosure protocols can have the potential for significant settlement obligations or even enforcement action.

The following legal proceedings are described in detail because, although they may not be required to be disclosed in this Part I, Item 3 under SEC rules, due to the nature of the business of the Company, we believe that the following discussion of these matters may provide useful information to security holders. This discussion does not include claims and lawsuits covered by medical malpractice, general liability or employment practices insurance and risk retention programs, none of which claims or lawsuits would in any event be required to be disclosed in this Part I, Item 3 under SEC rules. Certain of the matters referenced below are also discussed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements at Part II, Item 8 under Note 17 “Commitment and Contingencies.”

Community Health Systems, Inc. Legal Proceedings

Shareholder Litigation

Class Action Shareholder Federal Securities Cases. Three purported class action cases have been filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee; namely, Norfolk County Retirement System v. Community Health Systems, Inc., et al., filed May 9, 2011; De Zheng v. Community Health Systems, Inc., et al., filed May 12, 2011; and Minneapolis Firefighters Relief Association v. Community Health Systems, Inc., et al., filed June 21, 2011. All three seek class certification on behalf of purchasers of our common stock between July 27, 2006 and April 11, 2011 and allege that misleading statements resulted in artificially inflated prices for our common stock. In December 2011, the cases were consolidated for pretrial purposes and NYC Funds and its counsel were selected as lead plaintiffs/lead plaintiffs’ counsel. In lieu of ruling on our motion to dismiss, the court permitted the plaintiffs to file a first amended consolidated class action complaint which was filed on October 5, 2015. Our motion to dismiss was filed on November 4, 2015 and oral argument took place on April 11, 2016. Our motion to dismiss was granted on June 16, 2016 and on June 27, 2016, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. The matter is fully briefed and we are waiting on the setting of a date for oral argument. We believe this consolidated matter is without merit and will vigorously defend this case.

Shareholder Derivative Actions. Three purported shareholder derivative actions have also been filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee; Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 630 Pension Annuity Trust Fund v. Wayne T. Smith, et al., filed May 24, 2011; Roofers Local No. 149 Pension Fund v. Wayne T. Smith, et al., filed June 21, 2011; and Lambert Sweat v. Wayne T. Smith, et al., filed October 5, 2011. These three cases allege breach of fiduciary duty arising out of allegedly improper inpatient admission practices, mismanagement, waste and unjust enrichment. These cases have been consolidated into a single, consolidated action. The plaintiffs filed an operative amended derivative complaint in these three consolidated actions on March 15, 2012. Our motion to dismiss was argued on June 13, 2013. On September 27, 2013, the court issued an order granting in part and denying in part our motion to dismiss. This case was settled pursuant to a final order entered on January 17, 2017. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, we are required to adopt and maintain for a specified period certain corporate governance measures. For more information, see the order and stipulation of settlement filed as Exhibit 99.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Other Government Investigations

Dothan, Alabama – Independent Lab Billing. On February 12, 2015, our hospital in Dothan, Alabama received a Civil Investigative Demand, or CID, from the United States Department of Justice for information

concerning its status as a “covered hospital” under certain lab billing regulations. These regulations discuss permissible billing of the technical component of lab tests performed for hospital patients by an independent laboratory. The CID seeks documentation and explanation whether the hospital qualifies as a covered hospital for billing purposes under the applicable regulations. We are cooperating fully with this investigation.

Commercial Litigation and Other Lawsuits

Becker v. Community Health Systems, Inc. d/b/a Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation d/b/a Community Health Systems d/b/a Community Health Systems PSC, Inc. d/b/a Rockwood Clinic P.S. and Rockwood Clinic, P.S. (Superior Court, Spokane, Washington). This suit was filed on February 29, 2012, by a former chief financial officer at Rockwood Clinic in Spokane, Washington. Becker claims he was wrongfully terminated for allegedly refusing to certify a budget for Rockwood Clinic in 2012. On February 29, 2012, he also filed an administrative complaint with the Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration alleging that he is a whistleblower under Sarbanes-Oxley, which was dismissed by the agency and was appealed to an administrative law judge for a hearing that occurred on January 19-26, 2016. In a decision dated November 9, 2016, the law judge awarded Becker approximately $1.9 million for front pay, back pay and emotional damages with attorney fees to be later determined. We have appealed the award to the Administrative Review Board and briefing is currently underway. At a hearing on July 27, 2012, the trial court dismissed Community Health Systems, Inc. from the state case and subsequently certified the state case for an interlocutory appeal of the denial to dismiss his employer and the management company. The appellate court accepted the interlocutory appeal, and it was argued on April 30, 2014. On August 14, 2014, the court denied our appeal. On October 20, 2014, we filed a petition to review the denial with the Washington Supreme Court. Our appeal was accepted and oral argument was heard on June 9, 2015. On September 15, 2015, the court denied our appeal and remanded to the trial court; a previous trial setting of September 12, 2016 has been vacated and not reset. We continue to vigorously defend these actions.

Eliel Ntakirutimana, M.D. and Anesthesia Healthcare Partners of Laredo, P.A., Jose Berlioz, M.D. and Jose Berlioz, M.D., P.A. d/b/a Safari Pediatrics v. Laredo Texas Hospital Company, L.P. d/b/a Laredo Medical Center, CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Webb Hospital Corporation, Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation, Community Health Systems, Inc., Abraham “Abe” Martinez, Argelia “Argie” Martinez, Michael Portacci, Wayne Smith, Timothy P. Adams, and Timothy Schmidt. On December 28, 2012, two physicians and each of their professional associations, who previously contracted as independent contractors with Laredo Medical Center under contracts that could be terminated without cause upon certain written notice, filed a first amended complaint. The first amended complaint alleged claims for breaches of contracts, unjust enrichment, violation of the Texas Theft Liability Act, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, knowing participation in breach of fiduciary duty, defamation and business disparagement, R.I.C.O., economic duress/coercion, tortious interference with contracts or prospective business relations, conspiracy, respondent superior, actual and apparent authority, ratification, vice-principal liability, and joint enterprise liability. The first amended complaint, in part, alleges facts concerning payments made by Dr. Eliel Ntakirutimana to former Laredo Medical Center CEO, Abe Martinez, who is also a defendant in the suit. On October 23, 2013, an order staying the case until further notice was entered. On April 13, 2016, the magistrate judge entered an order lifting the stay and set a scheduling conference that was held on June 8, 2016. On July 22, 2016, we filed several motions for summary judgment. Additional motions for summary judgment have been filed. We continue to vigorously defend this matter.

Cyber Attack. As previously disclosed on a Current Report on Form 8-K filed by us on August 18, 2014, our computer network was the target of an external, criminal cyber-attack that we believe occurred between April and June, 2014. We and Mandiant (a FireEye Company), the forensic expert engaged by us in connection with this matter, believe the attacker was a foreign “Advanced Persistent Threat” group who used highly sophisticated malware and technology to attack our systems. The attacker was able to bypass our security measures and successfully copy and transfer outside the Company certain non-medical patient identification data (such as patient names, addresses, birthdates, telephone numbers and social security numbers), but not including patient

credit card, medical or clinical information. We continue to work closely with federal law enforcement authorities in connection with their investigation and possible prosecution of those determined to be responsible for this attack. Mandiant has conducted a thorough investigation of this incident and continues to advise us regarding security and monitoring efforts. We have provided appropriate notification to affected patients and regulatory agencies as required by federal and state law. We are offering identity theft protection services to individuals affected by this attack.

We have incurred certain expenses to remediate and investigate this matter, and expect to continue to incur expenses of this nature in the foreseeable future. In addition, multiple purported class action lawsuits have been filed against us and certain subsidiaries. These lawsuits allege that sensitive information was unprotected and inadequately encrypted by us. The plaintiffs claim breach of contract and other theories of recovery, and are seeking damages, as well as restitution for any identity theft. On February 4, 2015, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered the transfer of the purported class actions pending outside of the District Court for the Northern District of Alabama to the District Court for the Northern District of Alabama for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. A consolidated complaint was filed and we filed a motion to dismiss on September 21, 2015, which was partially argued on February 10, 2016. In an oral ruling from the bench, the court greatly limited the potential class by ruling only plaintiffs with specific injury resulting from the breach had standing to sue. Further, on jurisdictional grounds, the court dismissed Community Health Systems, Inc. from all non-Tennessee based cases. Finally, the court set April 15, 2016 for further argument on whether the remaining plaintiffs have sufficiently stated a cause of action to continue their cases. On April 15, 2016 in an oral ruling from the bench, the court dismissed additional claims and following this oral ruling only eight of the forty plaintiffs remained with significant limitations imposed on their ability to assert claims for damages. These oral rulings were confirmed in a written order filed on September 12, 2016. On October 20, 2016, the plaintiffs filed a renewed motion for interlocutory appeal from the motion to dismiss ruling and on February 15, 2017 this motion was denied. At this time, we are unable to predict the outcome of this litigation or determine the potential impact, if any, that could result from this litigation, but we intend to vigorously defend these lawsuits. This matter may subject us to additional litigation, potential governmental inquiries, potential reputational damage, and additional remediation, operating and other expenses.

Mounce v. Community Health Systems, Inc. This case is a purported class action lawsuit served on July 29, 2015, claiming our affiliated Arkansas hospitals violated payor contracts by allegedly improperly asserting hospital liens against third-party tortfeasors and seeking class certifications for any similarly situated plaintiffs at any affiliated Arkansas hospital. A motion of summary judgment and a motion of class certification have been filed and both are currently pending. We believe these claims are without merit and will vigorously defend the case.

Morrow v. Community Health Systems, Inc. This case is a purported class action lawsuit filed on July 25, 2016, in the United States District Court, Middle District of Tennessee alleging our affiliated hospital, South Baldwin Regional Medical Center in Foley, AL, violated a payor contract by allegedly improperly asserting a hospital lien against a third-party tortfeasor and allegedly unjustly enriching the hospital. The plaintiff seeks certification of a class for any similarly situated plaintiffs at any Company affiliated hospital. A motion to dismiss has been filed. We believe the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend the case.

Certain Legal Proceedings Related to HMA

Medicare/Medicaid Billing Lawsuits

Beginning during the week of December 16, 2013 eleven qui tam lawsuits filed by private individuals against HMA were unsealed in various United States district courts. The United States has elected to intervene in all or part of eight of these matters; namely U.S. ex rel. Craig Brummer v. Health Management Associates, Inc. et al. (Middle District Georgia) (“Brummer”); U.S. ex rel. Ralph D. Williams v. Health Management Associates, Inc. et al. (Middle District Georgia) (“Williams”); U.S. ex rel. Scott H. Plantz, M.D. et al. v. Health Management Associates, Inc., et al. (Northern District Illinois) (“Plantz”); U.S. ex rel. Thomas L. Mason, M.D. et al. v. Health Management Associates, Inc. et al. (Western District North Carolina) (“Mason”); U.S. ex rel. Jacqueline Meyer,

et al. v. Health Management Associates, Inc., Gary Newsome et al. (“Jacqueline Meyer”) (District of South Carolina); U.S. ex rel. George Miller, et al. v. Health Management Associates, Inc. (Eastern District of Pennsylvania) (“Miller”); U.S. ex rel. Bradley Nurkin v. Health Management Associates, Inc. et al. (Middle District of Florida) (“Nurkin”); and U.S. ex rel. Paul Meyer v. Health Management Associates, Inc. et al. (Southern District Florida) (“Paul Meyer”). The United States has elected to intervene with respect to allegations in these cases that certain HMA hospitals inappropriately admitted patients and then submitted reimbursement claims for treating those individuals to federal healthcare programs in violation of the False Claims Act or that certain HMA hospitals had inappropriate financial relationships with physicians which violated the Stark law, the Anti-Kickback Statute, and the False Claims Act. Certain of these complaints also allege the same actions violated various state laws which prohibit false claims. The United States has declined to intervene in three of the eleven matters, namely U.S. ex rel. Anita France, et al. v. Health Management Associates, Inc. (Middle District Florida) (“France”) which involved allegations of wrongful billing and was settled; U.S. ex rel. Sandra Simmons v. Health Management Associates, Inc. et al. (Eastern District Oklahoma) (“Simmons”) which alleges unnecessary surgery by an employed physician and which was settled as to all allegations except alleged wrongful termination; and U.S. ex rel. David Napoliello, M.D. v. Health Management Associates, Inc. (Middle District Florida) (“Napoliello”) which alleges inappropriate admissions. On April 3, 2014, the Multi District Litigation Panel ordered the transfer and consolidation for pretrial proceedings of the eight intervened cases, plus the Napoliello matter, to the District of the District of Columbia under the name In Re: Health Management Associates, Inc. Qui Tam Litigation. On June 2, 2014, the court entered a stay of this matter until October 6, 2014, which was subsequently extended until February 27, 2015, May 27, 2015, September 25, 2015, January 25, 2016, May 25, 2016, September 26, 2016, December 27, 2016 and now until April 27, 2017. We intend to defend against the allegations in these matters, but have also been cooperating with the government in the ongoing investigation of these allegations. We have been in discussions with the Civil Division of the DOJ regarding the resolution of these matters. During the first quarter of 2015, we were informed the Criminal Division continues to investigate former executive-level employees of HMA and continues to consider whether any HMA entities should be held criminally liable for the acts of the former HMA employees. We are voluntarily cooperating with these inquiries and have not been served with any subpoenas or other legal process.

Qui Tam Matters Where the Government Declined Intervention

U.S. ex rel. Richard M. O’Keeffe, Jr., M.D. v. The River Oaks Management Company, LLC, et al. (SD Mississippi). By order filed on February 10, 2017, the court ordered the unsealing of this matter. The unsealing revealed that on February 3, 2017 the United States had declined to intervene in the allegations that an HMA subsidiary had an inappropriate financial relationship with the relator because his employment contract allegedly was not fair market value in violation of the Stark law, the Anti-Kickback Statute and the False Claims Act. We believe this matter is without merit and will vigorously defend this case.

Securities and Exchange Commission Investigations

On April 25, 2013, HMA received a subpoena from the SEC, issued pursuant to an investigation, requesting documents related to accounts receivable, billing write-downs, contractual adjustments, reserves for doubtful accounts, and accounts receivable aging, and revenue from Medicare, Medicaid and from privately insured or uninsured patients. On June 5, 2013, HMA received a supplemental subpoena from the SEC which requests additional financial reports. Subsequent subpoenas have been directed to us, our accountants, the former accountants for HMA and certain individuals. On July 17, 2014, we received an additional subpoena from the SEC seeking numerous categories of documents relating to the financial statement adjustments taken in the fourth quarter of 2013 in the areas described above. This investigation is ongoing and we are unable to determine the potential impact, if any, of this investigation.

Class Action Lawsuits

On April 30, 2012, two class action lawsuits that were brought against HMA and certain of its then executive officers, one of whom was at that time also a director, were consolidated in the United States District Court for

the Middle District of Florida under the caption In Re: Health Management Associates, Inc., et al. and three pension fund plaintiffs were appointed as lead plaintiffs. On July 30, 2012, the lead plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated complaint purportedly on behalf of stockholders who purchased HMA’s common stock during the period from July 27, 2009, through January 9, 2012. The amended consolidated complaint (i) alleges that HMA made false and misleading statements in certain public disclosures regarding its business and financial results and (ii) asserts claims for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Among other things, the plaintiffs claim that HMA inflated its earnings by engaging in fraudulent Medicare billing practices that entailed admitting patients to observation status when they should not have been admitted at all and to inpatient status when they should have been admitted to observation status. The plaintiffs seek unspecified monetary damages. On October 22, 2012, the defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended consolidated complaint for failure to state a claim or plead facts required by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. The plaintiffs filed an unopposed stipulation and proposed order to suspend briefing on the defendants’ motion to dismiss because they intended to seek leave of court to file a proposed second amended consolidated complaint. On December 15, 2012, the court entered an order approving the stipulation and providing a schedule for briefing with respect to the proposed amended pleadings. On February 25, 2013, the plaintiffs filed a second amended consolidated complaint, which asserted substantially the same claims as the amended consolidated complaint. As of August 15, 2013, the defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint for failure to state a claim and plead facts required by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act was fully briefed and awaiting the Court’s decision. On May 22, 2014, the court granted the motion to dismiss and on June 20, 2014 the plaintiffs appealed to the Eleventh Circuit, where oral argument was heard on February 6, 2015. On May 11, 2015, the Eleventh Circuit Court affirmed the granting of the motion to dismiss. On June 11, 2015, plaintiffs filed an application for an en banc review. On June 24, 2016 the application for en banc review was denied. On November 21, 2016, plaintiff filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. On February 6, 2017, we filed a brief in opposition. We intend to vigorously defend against the allegations in this lawsuit. We are unable to predict the outcome or determine the potential impact, if any, that could result from its final resolution.

Lopez v. Yakima Regional Medial & Cardiac Center and Toppenish Community Hospital is a class action lawsuit arising out of alleged conduct at these hospitals prior to the HMA acquisition. The suit alleges the hospitals’ charity care policies did not comply with Washington state law. The trial court has certified a class and granted partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. This matter has now been settled.

Management of Significant Legal Proceedings

In accordance with our governance documents, including our Governance Guidelines and the charter of the Audit and Compliance Committee, our management of significant legal proceedings is overseen by the independent members of the Board of Directors and, in particular, the Audit and Compliance Committee. The Audit and Compliance Committee is charged with oversight of compliance, regulatory and litigation matters, and enterprise risk management. Management has been instructed to refer all significant legal proceedings and allegations of financial statement fraud, error, or misstatement to the Audit and Compliance Committee for its oversight and evaluation. Consistent with New York Stock Exchange, NASDAQ and Sarbanes-Oxley independence requirements, the Audit and Compliance Committee is comprised entirely of individuals who are independent of our management, and all three members of the Audit and Compliance Committee are “audit committee financial experts” as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

In addition, the Audit and Compliance Committee and the other independent members of the Board of Directors oversee the functions of the voluntary compliance program, including its auditing and monitoring functions and confidential disclosure program. In recent years, the voluntary compliance program has addressed the potential for a variety of billing errors that might be the subject of audits and payment denials by the CMS Recovery Audit Contractors’ permanent project, including MS-DRG coding, outpatient hospital and physician coding and billing, and medical necessity for services (including a focus on hospital stays of very short duration). Efforts by management, through the voluntary compliance program, to identify and limit risk from these

government audits have included significant policy and guidance revisions, training and education, and auditing. The Board of Directors now oversees and reviews periodic reports of our compliance with the Corporate Integrity Agreement, or CIA, that we entered into with the United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General during 2014.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

We completed an initial public offering of our common stock on June 14, 2000. Our common stock began trading on June 9, 2000 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CYH. As of February 15, 2017, there were approximately 188 record holders of our common stock. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sale prices per share of our common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange.


	High		Low
Year Ended December 31, 2015
First Quarter	$	46.46	$	37.46
Second Quarter		53.50		40.27
Third Quarter		52.66		33.35
Fourth Quarter		37.41		20.16
Year Ended December 31, 2016
First Quarter	$	27.30	$	12.86
Second Quarter		21.38		11.70
Third Quarter		13.59		9.66
Fourth Quarter		11.74		4.15

Stock Performance Graph

The following graph sets forth the cumulative return of our common stock during the five year period ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the cumulative return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index (S&P 500) and the cumulative return of the Dow Jones Healthcare Index. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and the reinvestment of dividends where applicable. The comparisons in the graph below are based on historical data and are not indicative of, or intended to forecast, future performance of our common stock. The market price of our common stock used to calculate the cumulative return has been adjusted in prior periods for the impact of the April 2016 QHC spin-off and related distribution of QHC common stock to our stockholders.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN

Among Community Health Systems, Inc., the S&P 500 Index, and the Dow Jones US Health Care Index

LOGO

The Company is a holding company which operates through its subsidiaries. Our Credit Facility and the indentures governing the senior and senior secured notes contain various covenants under which the assets of our subsidiaries are subject to certain restrictions relating to, among other matters, dividends and distributions, as referenced in the paragraph below.

With the exception of a special cash dividend of $0.25 per share paid by us in December 2012, historically, we have not paid any cash dividends. Subject to certain exceptions, our Credit Facility limits the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends and make distributions to us, and limits our ability to pay dividends and/or repurchase stock, to an amount not to exceed $200 million in the aggregate plus an additional $25 million in any particular year plus the aggregate amount of proceeds from the exercise of stock options. The indentures governing the senior and senior secured notes also restrict our subsidiaries from, among other matters, paying dividends and making distributions to us, which thereby limits our ability to pay dividends and/or repurchase stock. The non-cash dividend of approximately $713 million recorded by us during the year ended December 31, 2016 to reflect the distribution of the net assets of QHC was a permitted transaction under our Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2016, under the most restrictive test under these agreements (and subject to certain exceptions),

we have approximately $318 million remaining available with which to pay permitted dividends and/or repurchase shares of our stock or our senior and senior secured notes.

On November 6, 2015, we adopted a new open market repurchase program for up to 10,000,000 shares of our common stock, not to exceed $300 million in repurchases. This repurchase program will expire at the earliest of three years from the commencement date, when the maximum number of shares has been repurchased, or when the maximum dollar amount has been expended. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we repurchased and retired 532,188 shares, which is the cumulative number of shares repurchased and retired under this program, at a weighted-average price of $27.31 per share. No shares were repurchased under this program during the year ended December 31, 2016.

On December 10, 2014, we adopted an open market repurchase program for up to 5,000,000 shares of our common stock, not to exceed $150 million in repurchases. This repurchase program expired on December 1, 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we repurchased and retired the maximum 5,000,000 shares of our common stock authorized for repurchase under this program at a weighted-average price of $28.84 per share.

On December 14, 2011, we adopted an open market repurchase program for up to 4,000,000 shares of our common stock, not to exceed $100 million in repurchases. This repurchase program expired on December 13, 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we repurchased and retired 175,000 shares at a weighted-average price of $49.72 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we repurchased and retired 706,023 shares at a weighted-average price of $38.39 per share. The cumulative number of shares repurchased and retired under this program was 881,023 shares at a weighted-average price of $40.64 per share.


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased (a)		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(b)		Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(b)
October 1, 2016 - October 31, 2016		4,522	$	11.54		-		9,467,812
November 1, 2016 - November 30, 2016		-		-		-		9,467,812
December 1, 2016 - December 31, 2016		1,095		5.73		-		9,467,812


Total		5,617	$	10.41		-		9,467,812

(a)

Includes 5,617 shares withheld by us to satisfy the payment of tax obligations related to the vesting of restricted stock awards.

(b)

On November 9, 2015, we announced the adoption of a new open market repurchase program for up to 10,000,000 shares of our common stock, not to exceed $300 million in repurchases. The new repurchase program will expire on the earlier of November 5, 2018, when the maximum number of shares has been repurchased, or when the maximum dollar amount has been expended. No shares were repurchased under this program during the three months ended December 31, 2016.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table summarizes specified selected financial data and should be read in conjunction with our related Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Community Health Systems, Inc.

Five Year Summary of Selected Financial Data


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014			2013			2012
	(in millions, except share and per share data)
Consolidated Statement of (Loss) Income Data
Net operating revenues	$	18,438		$	19,437		$	18,639		$	12,819		$	12,833
(Loss) income from operations		(860	)		1,337			1,339			917			1,216
(Loss) income from continuing operations		(1,611	)		295			260			242			358
Net (loss) income		(1,626	)		259			203			217			346
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		95			101			111			76			80
Net (loss) income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders		(1,721	)		158			92			141			266
Basic (loss) earnings per share attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. common stockholders (1):
Continuing operations	$	(15.41	)	$	1.69		$	1.33		$	1.80		$	3.11
Discontinued operations		(0.13	)		(0.31	)		(0.51	)		(0.27	)		(0.13	)

Net (loss) income	$	(15.54	)	$	1.38		$	0.82		$	1.52		$	2.98

Diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. common stockholders (1):
Continuing operations	$	(15.41	)	$	1.68		$	1.32		$	1.77		$	3.09
Discontinued operations		(0.13	)		(0.31	)		(0.51	)		(0.27	)		(0.13	)

Net (loss) income	$	(15.54	)	$	1.37		$	0.82		$	1.51		$	2.96

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding:
Basic		110,730,971			114,454,674			111,579,088			92,633,332			89,242,949
Diluted (2)		110,730,971			115,272,404			112,549,320			93,815,013			89,806,937
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
Cash and cash equivalents	$	238		$	184		$	509		$	373		$	388
Total assets		21,944			26,595			27,118			16,972			16,439
Long-term obligations		16,775			18,847			18,915			11,024			11,131
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries		554			571			531			358			368
Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders’ equity		1,615			4,019			4,003			3,068			2,731
Noncontrolling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries		113			86			80			64			65

(1)

Total per share amounts may not add due to rounding.

(2)

See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read this discussion together with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and “Selected Financial Data” included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Executive Overview

We are one of the largest publicly traded hospital companies in the United States and a leading operator of general acute care hospitals and outpatient facilities in communities across the country. We provide healthcare services through the hospitals that we own and operate and affiliated businesses in non-urban and selected urban markets throughout the United States. We generate revenues by providing a broad range of general and specialized hospital healthcare services and outpatient services to patients in the communities in which we are located. As of December 31, 2016, we owned or leased 155 hospitals included in continuing operations, comprised of 152 general acute care hospitals and three stand-alone rehabilitation or psychiatric hospitals. We also owned or leased three hospitals included in discontinued operations at December 31, 2016. For the hospitals that we own and operate, we are paid for our services by governmental agencies, private insurers and directly by the patients we serve.

As noted above, we have been implementing a portfolio rationalization and deleveraging strategy by divesting hospitals and non-hospital businesses that are attractive to strategic and other buyers. Generally, these businesses are not in one of our strategically beneficial service areas, are less complementary to our business strategy and/or have lower operating margins. More recently, in connection with our announced divestiture initiative, strategic buyers have made offers to buy certain of our assets. Through consideration of these offers we have divested or may divest hospitals and non-hospital businesses when we find such offers to be attractive and in line with our operating strategy.

In furtherance of this strategy, on April 29, 2016, we completed a spin-off of 38 hospitals and Quorum Health Resources, or QHR (our subsidiary that provided management advisory and consulting services to non-affiliated general acute care hospitals located throughout the United States), into Quorum Health Corporation, or QHC, and distributed, on a pro rata basis, all of the shares of QHC common stock to our stockholders of record as of April 22, 2016. These stockholders received a distribution of one share of QHC common stock for every four shares of our common stock held as of the record date plus cash in lieu of any fractional shares. The transaction was structured to be generally tax free to us and our stockholders. In recognition of the spin-off, we recorded a non-cash dividend of approximately $713 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, representing the net assets of QHC distributed to our stockholders. Immediately following the completion of the spin-off, our stockholders owned 100% of the outstanding shares of QHC common stock. Following the spin-off, QHC became an independent public company with its common stock listed for trading under the symbol “QHC” on the New York Stock Exchange. Financial and statistical data reported in this Form 10-K include QHC operating results through the spin-off date. Same-store operating results and statistical data exclude information for the hospitals divested in the spin-off of QHC for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the comparable period in 2015.

In connection with the spin-off, we entered into a separation and distribution agreement as well as certain ancillary agreements with QHC on April 29, 2016. These agreements allocated between QHC and us the various assets, employees, liabilities and obligations (including investments, property and employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) that comprise the separate companies and govern certain relationships between, and activities of, QHC and us for a period of time after the spin-off.

On March 1, 2016, we completed the acquisition of an 80% ownership interest in a joint venture with Indiana University Health that includes IU Health La Porte Hospital (227 licensed beds) in La Porte, Indiana and IU Health Starke Hospital (50 licensed beds) in Knox, Indiana, and affiliated outpatient centers and physician practices.

On April 1, 2016, we completed the acquisition of 80% interest in Physicians’ Specialty Hospital (20 licensed beds), a Medicare-certified specialty surgical hospital in Fayetteville, Arkansas.

On April 29, 2016, we sold our unconsolidated minority equity interests in Valley Health System, LLC, a joint venture with Universal Health Systems, Inc., or UHS, representing four hospitals in Las Vegas, Nevada, in which we owned a 27.5% interest, and in Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC, a joint venture with UHS representing one hospital in Las Vegas, Nevada, in which we owned a 26.1% interest. We received $403 million in cash in return for the sale of these equity interests and recognized a gain of approximately $94 million on the sale of our investment during the year ended December 31, 2016.

On September 29, 2016, we signed a definitive agreement with subsidiaries of Curae Health, Inc. to sell the hospitals and associated assets at Merit Health Gilmore Memorial (95 licensed beds) in Amory, Mississippi, Merit Health Batesville (112 licensed beds) in Batesville, Mississippi, and Merit Health Northwest Mississippi (181 licensed beds) in Clarksdale, Mississippi. We have classified these hospitals as held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Based on the sales price for the sale of these hospitals, we recorded impairment charges of approximately $31 million related to the allocated hospital reporting unit goodwill and $20 million related to the adjustment of the fair value of certain long-lived assets during the year ended December 31, 2016.

On November 17, 2016, we signed a definitive agreement for the sale of two hospitals, a clinic and their associated assets to MultiCare Health System. Facilities included in the transaction include Deaconess Hospital (388 licensed beds) in Spokane, Washington, Valley Hospital (123 licensed beds) in Spokane Valley, Washington and the multi-specialty Rockwood Clinic in Spokane, Washington. We have classified these hospitals as held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Based on the sales price for the sale of these hospitals, we recorded an impairment charge of approximately $168 million related to the allocated hospital reporting unit goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2016.

On December 13, 2016, we signed a definitive agreement to sell two hospitals and their associated assets to subsidiaries of Sunnyside Community Hospital and Clinics. Facilities included in the transaction are Yakima Regional Medical and Cardiac Center (214 licensed beds) in Yakima, Washington and Toppenish Community Hospital (63 licensed beds) in Toppenish, Washington. We have classified these hospitals as held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Based on the sales price for the sale of these hospitals, we recorded impairment charges of approximately $20 million related to the allocated hospital reporting unit goodwill and $26 million related to the adjustment of the fair value of certain long-lived assets during the year ended December 31, 2016.

On December 22, 2016, we completed the sale and leaseback of ten medical office buildings for net proceeds of $159 million to HCP, Inc. The buildings, with a combined total of 756,183 square feet, are located in five states and support a wide array of diagnostic, medical and surgical services in an outpatient setting for the respective nearby hospitals. Because of our continuing involvement in these leased buildings, the transaction does not qualify for sale treatment and the related leases have been recorded as financing obligations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016.

On December 31, 2016, we sold an 80% majority ownership interest in the home care division to a subsidiary of Almost Family, Inc. for $128 million. In connection with the divestiture of a controlling interest in the home care division, we recorded a gain of approximately $91 million on December 31, 2016.

On February 16, 2017, we signed a definitive agreement for the sale of eight hospitals and their associated assets to subsidiaries of Steward Health, Inc. The facilities included in this transaction are Easton Hospital (254 licensed beds) in Easton, Pennsylvania, Sharon Regional Health System (258 licensed beds) in Sharon, Pennsylvania, Northside Medical Center (355 licensed beds) in Youngstown, Ohio, Trumbull Memorial Hospital (311 licensed beds) in Warren, Ohio, Hillside Rehabilitation Hospital (69 licensed beds) in Warren, Ohio, Wuesthoff Health System – Rockledge (298 licensed beds) in Rockledge, Florida, Wuesthoff Health System – Melbourne (119 licensed beds) in Melbourne, Florida and Sebastian River Medical Center (154 licensed beds) in Sebastian, Florida.

Including the hospitals identified above, we have entered into definitive agreements or non-binding letters of intent to sell 25 hospitals. Based on the current status of those negotiations, we currently anticipate those transactions to close in 2017; however, there can be no assurance that these dispositions will be completed or, if they are completed, the ultimate timing of the completion of these dispositions or the aggregate amount of proceeds we will receive from the divestitures. These additional hospitals represented annual net operating revenues in 2016 of approximately $3.0 billion, and based on currently expected terms we estimate that we will receive potential net proceeds of approximately $1.5 billion in the event we dispose all of these hospitals. There may be changes from time to time in the composition of the particular hospitals where we have entered into non-binding letters of intent as the result of various factors, including changes in any potential buyer or the negotiations with respect to the potential sale of any such hospital. These potential dispositions, as well as the dispositions that were completed in 2016 are intended to further implement our portfolio rationalization and deleveraging strategy as described above. When consistent with this strategy, we intend to continue to evaluate offers from potential buyers for additional divestitures and optimize our hospital asset portfolio.

Operating results and statistical data for the year ended December 31, 2016, exclude our hospitals that have previously been classified as discontinued operations for accounting purposes. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2015, we divested seven hospitals previously recorded in discontinued operations and one additional hospital. Two of these hospitals were required to be divested by the Federal Trade Commission as a condition of its approval of our acquisition of Health Management Associates, Inc., or HMA.

Our net operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased $999 million to approximately $18.4 billion compared to approximately $19.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2015. On a same-store basis, net operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased $233 million. Our provision for bad debts decreased to $2.8 billion, or 13.3% of operating revenues (before the provision for bad debts) for the year ended December 31, 2016, from $3.1 billion, or 13.9% of operating revenues (before the provision for bad debts) for the year ended December 31, 2015.

We had a loss from continuing operations of $1.6 billion during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to income from continuing operations of $295 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Loss from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 included the following:

•

an after-tax expense of $10 million for government and other legal settlements and related legal expenses,

•

an after-tax charge of $320 million for the impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets of hospitals sold or held for sale based on their estimated fair values, which was partially offset by after-tax income of $52 million for the gain on the sale of a majority ownership interest in our home care division,

•

an after-tax charge of $11 million related to costs incurred for the spin-off of QHC,

•

an after-tax charge of $19 million for loss from early extinguishment of debt,

•

an after-tax charge of $1 million for costs incurred related to the sale of a majority ownership interest in our home care division,

•

an after-tax charge of $1.5 billion related to the impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets based on their estimated fair values,

•

after-tax income of $4 million from fair value adjustments on the CVR agreement liability accounted for at fair value related to the HMA legal proceedings, and related legal expenses and

•

after-tax income of $60 million for the gain on sale of investments as noted above.

Income from continuing operations before noncontrolling interests for the year ended December 31, 2015 included the following:

•

an after-tax charge of $10 million for loss from early extinguishment of debt,

•

an after-tax charge of $1 million for acquisition and integration costs from the HMA merger,

•

an after-tax charge of $3 million for government legal settlements for several qui tam matters settled in principle and related legal expenses,

•

an after-tax charge of $41 million for the impairment of long-lived assets,

•

an after-tax charge of $5 million from fair value adjustments on the CVR agreement liability accounted for at fair value related to the HMA legal proceedings, and related legal expenses,

•

an after-tax charge of $10 million related to costs incurred for the planned spin-off of QHC and

•

an after tax charge of $108 million related to the increase in the provision for bad debts.

Consolidated inpatient admissions for the year ended December 31, 2016, decreased 8.8%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, and consolidated adjusted admissions for the year ended December 31, 2016, decreased 8.4%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. Same-store inpatient admissions for the year ended December 31, 2016, decreased 1.9%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, and same-store adjusted admissions for the year ended December 31, 2016, decreased 0.5%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.

Self-pay revenues represented approximately 12.2% and 12.3% of net operating revenues for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The amount of foregone revenue related to providing charity care services as a percentage of net operating revenues was approximately 2.6% and 2.3% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Direct and indirect costs incurred in providing charity care services as a percentage of net operating revenues were approximately 0.4% and 0.3% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The U.S. Congress and certain state legislatures have introduced and passed a large number of proposals and legislation designed to make major changes in the healthcare system, including changes that increased access to health insurance. The Affordable Care Act, as currently structured, mandates that substantially all U.S. citizens maintain health insurance and increases health insurance coverage through a combination of public program expansion and private sector health insurance reforms.

If this expansion of Medicaid coverage and private sector health insurance remains in effect, we believe this expansion would, over time, result in an increase in the number of patients using our facilities who have health insurance coverage. We expect this would increase our reimbursement related to providing services to individuals who were previously uninsured, which would reduce our expense from uncollectible accounts receivable. We

operate hospitals in five of the ten states that experienced the largest reductions in uninsured rates among adult residents between 2013 and 2015. The states with the greatest reductions in the number of uninsured adult residents have expanded Medicaid. A number of states have opted out of the Medicaid coverage expansion provisions, but could ultimately decide to expand their programs at a later date. Of the 21 states in which we operated hospitals that were included in continuing operations as of December 31, 2016, 10 states have taken action to expand their Medicaid programs, including Louisiana, which initiated Medicaid coverage expansion in July of 2016. At this time, the other 11 states have not, including Florida, Tennessee and Texas, where we operated a significant number of hospitals as of December 31, 2016. Some states that have opted out are evaluating options such as waiver plans to operate an alternative Medicaid expansion plan. Failure to expand Medicaid or implement an effective alternative in these states will likely have a negative impact on the goal of reducing the number of uninsured individuals.

The Affordable Care Act makes a number of changes to Medicare and Medicaid, such as reductions to the Medicare annual market basket update for federal fiscal years 2010 through 2019, a productivity offset to the Medicare market basket update, and a reduction to the Medicare and Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments, each of which could adversely impact the reimbursement received under these programs.

The Affordable Care Act also includes provisions aimed at reducing fraud, waste and abuse in the healthcare industry. It amends several existing federal laws, including the Anti-Kickback Statute and the False Claims Act, to make it easier for government agencies and private plaintiffs to prevail in lawsuits brought against healthcare providers and for potentially severe fines and penalties to be imposed on healthcare providers that violate applicable laws and regulations.

The various provisions in the Affordable Care Act that directly or indirectly affect reimbursement take effect over a number of years. We believe that the Affordable Care Act has had a positive impact on net operating revenues and income from continuing operations as the result of the expansion of private sector and Medicaid coverage that has occurred. However, other provisions of the Affordable Care Act, such as requirements related to employee health insurance coverage, have increased our operating costs. In addition, the Affordable Care Act has made changes to Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement that could adversely impact the reimbursement we receive under these programs. These changes include reductions to the Medicare annual market basket update for federal fiscal years 2010 through 2019, a productivity offset to the Medicare market basket update, and reductions to the Medicare and Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments. Each of these changes could adversely impact the reimbursement.

While the Affordable Care Act remains in effect, it is difficult to predict the ultimate effect of the statute due to executive orders or clarifications and modifications resulting from the rule-making process, future judicial interpretations resulting from court challenges to its constitutionality and interpretation, whether and how many states ultimately decide to expand Medicaid coverage, the number of uninsured who elect to purchase health insurance coverage and budgetary issues at federal and state levels. We may not be able to fully realize the positive impact the Affordable Care Act may otherwise have on our business, results of operations, cash flow, capital resources and liquidity. Furthermore, we cannot predict whether we will be able to modify certain aspects of our operations to offset any potential adverse consequences from the Affordable Care Act.

As described herein, the future of the Affordable Care Act is uncertain following the 2016 federal elections. The impact and timing of any potential repeal of or changes to the Affordable Care Act and any alternative provisions on our business is unknown.

The federal government has implemented a number of regulations and programs designed to promote the use of electronic health records, or EHR, technology and pursuant to the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH, established requirements for a Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments program for eligible hospitals and professionals that adopt and meaningfully use certified EHR technology. These payments are available for a maximum period of five or six years, depending on the program.

Our hospital facilities have been implementing EHR technology on a facility-by-facility basis since 2011. We recognize incentive reimbursement related to the Medicare or Medicaid incentives as we are able to implement the certified EHR technology and meet the defined “meaningful use criteria,” and information from completed cost report periods is available from which to calculate the incentive reimbursement. The timing of recognizing incentive reimbursement does not correlate with the timing of recognizing operating expenses and incurring capital costs in connection with the implementation of EHR technology which may result in material period-to-period changes in our future results of operations.

As of October 1, 2014, eligible hospitals and, as of January 1, 2015, professionals that have not demonstrated meaningful use of certified EHR technology and have not applied and qualified for a hardship exception are subject to payment adjustments. Eligible hospitals are subject to a reduced market basket update to the inpatient prospective payment system standardized amount as of 2015 and for each subsequent fiscal year. Eligible professionals are subject to a 1% per year cumulative reduction applied to the Medicare physician fee schedule amount for covered professional services, subject to a cap of 5%. Payment adjustments for eligible professionals failing to demonstrate meaningful use will no longer be applicable beginning in 2019, when the program is scheduled to be replaced by MIPS.

Although we believe that our hospital facilities are currently in compliance with the meaningful use standards, there can be no assurance that all of our facilities will remain in compliance and therefore not be subject to the HITECH payment reductions. We recognized approximately $70 million, $160 million and $259 million during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for HITECH incentive reimbursements from Medicare and Medicaid related to certain of our hospitals and for certain of our employed physicians, which are presented as a reduction of operating expenses. As our hospital facilities and affiliated professionals have achieved substantial compliance with the HITECH standards and continue to complete the maximum time period for receiving incentive payments, the amount of incentive reimbursements will continue to decline in 2017.

As a result of our current levels of cash, available borrowing capacity, long-term outlook on our debt repayments, the refinancing of our term loans and our continued projection of our ability to generate cash flows, we anticipate that we will be able to invest the necessary capital in our business over the next twelve months. We believe there continues to be ample opportunity for growth in substantially all of our markets by decreasing the need for patients to travel outside their communities for healthcare services. Furthermore, we will continue to strive to improve operating efficiencies and procedures in order to improve our profitability at all of our hospitals.

Completed Acquisitions and Divestitures

On March 1, 2016, we completed the acquisition of an 80% ownership interest in a joint venture entity with Indiana University Health that includes substantially all of the assets of IU Health La Porte Hospital (“La Porte”) in La Porte, Indiana (227 licensed beds) and IU Health Starke Hospital (“Starke”) in Knox, Indiana (50 licensed beds), and affiliated outpatient centers and physician practices. The total cash consideration paid for the 80% ownership interest in this joint venture was approximately $96 million with additional consideration of $8 million assumed in liabilities, for a total consideration of $104 million. The value of the noncontrolling interest at acquisition was $25 million. Based upon our preliminary purchase price allocation relating to this acquisition as of December 31, 2016, approximately $45 million of goodwill has been recorded. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price has been determined by us based on available information and is subject to settling amounts related to purchased working capital and final appraisals of tangible and intangible assets. Adjustments to the purchase price allocation are not expected to be material.

On April 1, 2016, we completed the acquisition of an 80% interest in Physicians’ Specialty Hospital (20 licensed beds), a Medicare-certified specialty surgical hospital in Fayetteville, Arkansas. The total cash consideration paid for the 80% ownership interest in this joint venture was approximately $12 million, with additional consideration of $2 million assumed in liabilities, for a total consideration of $14 million. The value of the noncontrolling interest at acquisition was $2 million. Based upon our preliminary purchase price allocation

relating to this acquisition as of December 31, 2016, approximately $12 million of goodwill has been recorded. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price has been determined by us based on available information and is subject to settling amounts related to purchased working capital and final appraisals of tangible and intangible assets. Adjustments to the purchase price allocation are not expected to be material.

During 2016, we paid approximately $16 million to acquire the operating assets and related businesses of certain physician practices, clinics and other ancillary businesses that operate within the communities served by our hospitals. In connection with these acquisitions, we allocated approximately $8 million of the consideration paid to property and equipment and net working capital, and the remainder, approximately $14 million consisting of intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition, was allocated to goodwill. The value of the noncontrolling interest acquired in these acquisitions was $6 million.

Effective January 1, 2016, we sold Bartow Regional Medical Center (72 licensed beds) in Bartow Florida, and related outpatient services to BayCare Health Systems, Inc. for approximately $60 million in cash, which was received at the preliminary closing on December 31, 2015.

Effective February 1, 2016, we sold Lehigh Regional Medical Center (88 licensed beds) in Lehigh Acres, Florida, and related outpatient services to Prime for approximately $11 million in cash.

Effective September 3, 2016, we finalized an agreement to terminate the lease and cease operations of Alliance Health Blackwell (53 licensed beds) in Blackwell, Oklahoma, agreeing to terminate the lease with the landlord, The Blackwell Hospital Trust Authority. Income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 includes an impairment charge of approximately $3 million related to the write-off of certain intangible assets abandoned as part of exiting the lease to operate this hospital.

Sources of Revenue

The following table presents the approximate percentages of operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before provision for bad debts), by payor source for the periods indicated. The data for the periods presented are not strictly comparable due to the effect that hospital acquisitions and divestitures have had on these statistics.


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Medicare		23.9	%		24.1	%		24.7	%
Medicaid		10.5			11.2			10.8
Managed Care and other third-party payors		53.4			52.4			51.5
Self-pay		12.2			12.3			13.0

Total		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

As shown above, we receive a substantial portion of our revenues from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Included in Managed Care and other third-party payors is operating revenues from insurance companies with which we have insurance provider contracts, Medicare managed care, insurance companies for which we do not have insurance provider contracts, workers’ compensation carriers and non-patient service revenue, such as rental income and cafeteria sales. In the future, we generally expect revenues received from the Medicare and Medicaid programs to increase due to the general aging of the population. In addition, the Affordable Care Act has increased and is expected to continue to increase the number of insured patients in states that have expanded Medicaid, which in turn, has reduced and is expected to continue to reduce the percentage of revenues from self-

pay patients. The Affordable Care Act, however, imposes significant reductions in amounts the government pays Medicare managed care plans. The trend toward increased enrollment in Medicare managed care may adversely affect our operating revenue growth. Other provisions in the Affordable Care Act impose minimum medical-loss ratios and require insurers to meet specific benefit requirements. Furthermore, in the normal course of business, managed care programs, insurance companies and employers actively negotiate the amounts paid to hospitals. The trend toward increased enrollment in managed care may adversely affect our operating revenue growth. There can be no assurance that we will retain our existing reimbursement arrangements or that these third-party payors will not attempt to further reduce the rates they pay for our services.

Net operating revenues include amounts estimated by management to be reimbursable by Medicare and Medicaid under prospective payment systems and provisions of cost-based reimbursement and other payment methods. In addition, we are reimbursed by non-governmental payors using a variety of payment methodologies. Amounts we receive for the treatment of patients covered by Medicare, Medicaid and non-governmental payors are generally less than the standard billing rates. We account for the differences between the estimated program reimbursement rates and the standard billing rates as contractual allowance adjustments, which we deduct from gross revenues to arrive at net operating revenues. Final settlements under some of these programs are subject to adjustment based on administrative review and audit by third parties. We account for adjustments to previous program reimbursement estimates as contractual allowance adjustments and report them in the periods that such adjustments become known. Contractual allowance adjustments related to final settlements and previous program reimbursement estimates impacted net operating revenues and net (loss) income by an insignificant amount in each of the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.

The payment rates under the Medicare program for hospital inpatient and outpatient acute care services are based on a prospective payment system, depending upon the diagnosis of a patient’s condition. These rates are indexed for inflation annually, although increases have historically been less than actual inflation. On August 2, 2016, CMS issued the final rule to increase this index by 2.7% for hospital inpatient acute care services that are reimbursed under the prospective payment system, beginning October 1, 2016. The final rule provides for a 1.5% reduction for documentation and coding, a 0.3% multifactor productivity reduction, a 0.75% reduction to hospital inpatient rates implemented pursuant to the Affordable Care Act, and a 0.8% increase to remove the effects of prior adjustments intended to offset projected spending increases associated with the “two midnight rule.” These, together with other payment adjustments, will yield an estimated net 1.0% increase in reimbursement for hospitals. An additional reduction applies to hospitals that do not submit required patient quality data. We are complying with this data submission requirement.

Payments may also be affected by admission and medical review criteria for inpatient services commonly known as the “two midnight rule.” Under the rule, for admissions on or after October 1, 2013, services to Medicare beneficiaries are only payable as inpatient hospital services when there is a reasonable expectation that the hospital care is medically necessary and will be required across two midnights, absent unusual circumstances. Stays expected to need less than two midnights of hospital care are subject to medical review on a case-by-case basis. Reductions in the rate of increase or overall reductions in Medicare reimbursement may cause a decline in the growth of our net operating revenues.

Currently, several states utilize supplemental reimbursement programs for the purpose of providing reimbursement to providers to offset a portion of the cost of providing care to Medicaid and indigent patients. These programs are designed with input from CMS and are funded with a combination of state and federal resources, including, in certain instances, fees or taxes levied on the providers. Similar programs are also being considered by other states. The programs are generally authorized for a specified period of time and require CMS’s approval to be extended. CMS has indicated that it will take into account a state’s status with respect to expanding its Medicaid program in considering whether to extend these supplemental programs. We are unable to predict whether or on what terms CMS will extend the supplemental programs in the states in which we operate, including Texas. Some of these programs are scheduled to expire in 2017. As a result of existing supplemental programs, we recognize revenue and related expenses in the period in which the fixed and

determinable amounts are estimable and collection is reasonably assured. Reimbursement under these programs is reflected in net operating revenues and included as Medicaid revenue in the table above, and fees, taxes or other program related costs are reflected in other operating expenses.

Results of Operations

Our hospitals offer a variety of services involving a broad range of inpatient and outpatient medical and surgical services. These include general acute care, emergency room, general and specialty surgery, critical care, internal medicine, obstetrics, diagnostic services, psychiatric and rehabilitation services. The strongest demand for hospital services generally occurs during January through April and the weakest demand for these services generally occurs during the summer months. Accordingly, eliminating the effects of new acquisitions and/or divestitures, our net operating revenues and earnings are historically highest during the first quarter and lowest during the third quarter.

The following tables summarize, for the periods indicated, selected operating data.


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Operating results, as a percentage of net operating revenues:
Net operating revenues		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Operating expenses (a)		(88.3	)		(86.8	)		(86.3	)
Depreciation and amortization		(6.0	)		(6.0	)		(6.3	)
Impairment and (gain) loss on sale of businesses, net		(10.4	)		(0.3	)		(0.2	)

(Loss) income from operations		(4.7	)		6.9			7.2
Interest expense, net		(5.2	)		(5.0	)		(5.3	)
Loss from early extinguishment of debt		(0.2	)		(0.1	)		(0.4	)
Gain on sale of investments in unconsolidated affiliates		0.5			-			-
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates		0.3			0.3			0.3

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes		(9.3	)		2.1			1.8
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes		0.6			(0.6	)		(0.4	)

(Loss) income from continuing operations		(8.7	)		1.5			1.4
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(0.1	)		(0.2	)		(0.3	)

Net (loss) income		(8.8	)		1.3			1.1
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(0.5	)		(0.5	)		(0.6	)

Net (loss) income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders		(9.3	)%		0.8	%		0.5	%


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
Percentage (decrease) increase from prior year:
Net operating revenues		(5.1	)%		4.3	%
Admissions		(8.8	)		1.7
Adjusted admissions (b)		(8.4	)		3.5
Average length of stay		2.3			-
Net (loss) income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. (c)		(1,189.2	)		71.7
Same-store percentage increase (decrease) from prior year (d):
Net operating revenues		1.4	%		2.4	%
Admissions		(1.9	)		(1.8	)
Adjusted admissions (b)		(0.5	)		0.3

(a)	Operating expenses include salaries and benefits, supplies, other operating expenses, government and other legal settlements and related costs, electronic health records incentive reimbursement and rent.

(b)	Adjusted admissions is a general measure of combined inpatient and outpatient volume. We computed adjusted admissions by multiplying admissions by gross patient revenues and then dividing that number by gross inpatient revenues.

(c)	Includes loss from discontinued operations.

(d)

Includes acquired hospitals to the extent we operated them in both periods and excludes our hospitals that have previously been classified as discontinued operations for accounting purposes. In addition, also excludes information for the hospitals divested in the spin-off of QHC, sold or closed during the year ended December 31, 2016, and the comparable period in 2015.

Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015

Net operating revenues decreased by 5.1% to approximately $18.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016, from approximately $19.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our provision for bad debts decreased to $2.8 billion, or 13.3% of operating revenues (before the provision for bad debts) for the year ended December 31, 2016, from $3.1 billion, or 13.9% of operating revenues (before the provision for bad debts) for the year ended December 31, 2015. Net operating revenues from same-store hospitals increased $233 million, or 1.4% during the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. Non-same-store net operating revenues decreased $1.2 billion during the year ended December 31, 2016, in comparison to the prior year period, with the decrease attributable to the spin-off of QHC. The increase in same-store net operating revenues was attributable to favorable changes in payor mix partially offset by lower admissions. On a consolidated basis, inpatient admissions decreased by 8.8% and adjusted admissions decreased by 8.4% during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. On a same-store basis, net operating revenues per adjusted admissions increased 1.9%, while inpatient admissions decreased by 1.9% and adjusted admissions decreased by 0.5% during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.

Operating expenses, as a percentage of net operating revenues, increased from 93.1% during the year ended December 31, 2015 to 104.7% during the year ended December 31, 2016. Operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization and impairment and (gain) loss on sale of businesses, as a percentage of net operating revenues, increased from 86.8% for the year ended December 31, 2015 to 88.3% for the year ended December 31, 2016. Salaries and benefits, as a percentage of net operating revenues, increased from 46.3% for the year ended December 31, 2015 to 46.8% for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase in salaries and benefits, as a percentage of net operating revenues, was primarily due to increases in physician employment, annual merit increases and an increase in the cost of employee health benefits. Supplies, as a percentage of net operating revenues, increased from 15.7% for the year ended December 31, 2015 to 16.3% for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily as a result of an increase in drug and implant costs due to an increase in surgical case mix over the prior year. Other operating expenses, as a percentage of net operating revenues, decreased from 23.2% for the year ended December 31, 2015 to 23.1% for the year ended December 31, 2016. Government and other legal settlements and related costs, as a percentage of net revenues increased from less than 0.1% for the year ended December 31, 2015 to 0.1% for the year ended December 31, 2016. Rent, as a percentage of net operating revenues, was 2.4% for both the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

EHR incentive reimbursements represent those incentives under HITECH for which the recognition criterion has been met. We recognized approximately $70 million and $160 million of incentive reimbursements, or 0.4% and 0.8% of net operating revenues, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We received cash payments of $123 million and $75 million for these incentives during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization, as a percentage of net operating revenues, was 6.0% for both the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Impairment and gain (loss) on sale of businesses was $1.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $68 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets for the year ended December 31, 2016 included impairment of approximately $12 million related to the allocated reporting unit goodwill and fixed assets of two hospitals sold during the three months ended March 31, 2016, impairment of approximately $326 million related to the allocated reporting unit goodwill and certain long-lived assets of the 18 hospitals designated as held for sale during the year ended December 31, 2016, impairment of approximately $7 million related to certain long-lived assets at one of our smaller hospitals permanently closed, impairment of $1.395 billion of goodwill related to declines in fair value of our hospital reporting unit and $270 million related to the adjustment of the fair value of certain long-lived assets at certain hospitals we intend to sell and for other underperforming hospitals. These charges were partially offset by the gain of $91 million recorded on the sale of an 80% majority ownership interest in the home care division. Impairment and gain (loss) on sale of businesses for the year ended December 31, 2015 includes an impairment charge of approximately $6 million related to the reporting unit goodwill allocated to one hospital sold during the year ended December 31, 2015 and $62 million related to the impairment of certain long-lived assets for several smaller hospitals recorded in the quarter ended December 31, 2015. These hospitals were identified as having permanent indicators of impairment due to a history of negative operating results and declining volumes, resulting in a decline in projections of future cash flows and estimated fair values.

Interest expense, net, decreased by $11 million to $962 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $973 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to a decrease in our average outstanding debt during the year ended December 31, 2016, which resulted in a decrease in interest expense of $59 million, partially offset by an increase in interest rates during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, which resulted in an increase in interest expense of $38 million. Additionally, interest expense increased $7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as a result of less interest being capitalized as compared to the same period in 2015 due to the decline in major construction projects during the year, and an increase in interest expense of $3 million due to one additional day of interest expense since 2016 was a leap year.

The loss from early extinguishment of debt of $30 million was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2016 resulting from the repayment of certain outstanding notes and term loans under the Credit Facility. The loss from early extinguishment of debt of $16 million was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2015 resulting from the repayment of certain outstanding term loans as part of the amendment of the Credit Facility.

The gain on sale of investments in unconsolidated affiliates of $94 million was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2016 resulting from the sale of our unconsolidated minority equity interests in Valley Health System LLC, a joint venture with UHS representing four hospitals in Las Vegas, Nevada, in which we owned a 27.5% interest, and in Summerlin Hospital Medical Center LLC, a joint venture with UHS representing one hospital in Las Vegas, Nevada, in which we owned a 26.1% interest.

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, as a percentage of net operating revenues, was 0.3% for both the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

The net results of the above-mentioned changes resulted in income from continuing operations before income taxes decreasing $2.1 billion from income of $411 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to a loss of $1.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016.

The provision for income taxes on income from continuing operations decreased from $116 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to a benefit of $104 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to the decrease in income from continuing operations before income taxes. Our effective tax rates were 6.1% and 28.4% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The decrease in our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2016, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, was primarily due to the impairment of non-deductible goodwill and the non-deductible nature of certain costs incurred to complete the spin-off of QHC. Including the expense related to income attributable to noncontrolling interests, the

effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 would have been 5.7% and 37.6%, respectively. This decrease was primarily due to the non-deductible nature of goodwill written off for impairment and divestitures, as well as the non-deductible nature of certain costs incurred to complete the spin-off of QHC.

Income (loss) from continuing operations, as a percentage of net operating revenues, decreased from 1.5% for the year ended December 31, 2015 to (8.7)% for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Discontinued operations for these periods include the results of operations of certain hospitals owned or leased by us as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, which were classified as being held for sale or sold. The operation of these hospitals resulted in a loss, net of taxes, of $7 million and $27 million included in discontinued operations during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. An after-tax impairment charge of $8 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2016, based on the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying value of the assets held for sale compared to an impairment charge of $5 million during the year ended December 31, 2015. In addition, a loss on the sale of hospitals, net of tax, of $4 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2015. Overall, discontinued operations during the year ended December 31, 2016, consisted of a loss, net of taxes, of $15 million, compared to a loss, net of taxes, of $36 million during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Net income (loss), as a percentage of net operating revenues, decreased from income of 1.3% for the year ended December 31, 2015 to a loss of (8.8)% for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, as a percentage of net operating revenues, was 0.5% for both the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Net loss attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. was $1.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to net income of $158 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease in net income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. was primarily due to the impairment of goodwill and certain long-lived assets based on their estimated fair values.

Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014

Net operating revenues increased by 4.3% to approximately $19.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2015, from approximately $18.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2014. Our provision for bad debts increased to $3.1 billion, or 13.9% of operating revenues (before the provision for bad debts) for the year ended December 31, 2015, from $2.9 billion, or 13.6% of operating revenues (before the provision for bad debts) for the year ended December 31, 2014. During the fourth quarter of 2015, we noted that two key indicators analyzed as part of the estimate for the allowance for doubtful accounts – cash collections as a percentage of trailing twelve months revenue and days revenue outstanding – had trended unfavorably since the end of the third quarter of 2015. We also updated our analysis of historical collection rates utilized in the estimate for the allowance for doubtful accounts, which revealed a deterioration in overall collectability of accounts receivable. As a result, we refined our estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts and recorded an increase to the provision for bad debts, which has been accounted for as a change in estimate during the fourth quarter of 2015. We believe the increase in uncollectible accounts was the result of slightly lower benefits from healthcare reform compared to what was previously estimated and deterioration in the quality of certain categories of self-pay accounts being pursued for collection by our in-house collection agency. These specific categories of self-pay accounts included decreases in collections of deductibles and co-pays, increases in personal bankruptcies, and declines in the growth of scheduled time payments.

The $798 million increase in net operating revenues included $404 million of revenues related to the operations of the hospitals acquired in the HMA merger due to having an additional 26 days of operations for such hospitals during the year ended December 31, 2015. In addition, net operating revenues from same-store hospitals, excluding hospitals acquired in the HMA merger, increased $434 million. These increases in revenue were offset by a decrease of $40 million in revenue related to non-same-store net operating revenue, primarily

from the other four hospitals acquired in 2014 and impacted by the change in estimate of the provision for bad debts discussed above. On a same-store basis, net operating revenue increased 2.4% during the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in same-store net operating revenues was attributable to favorable changes in payor mix with corresponding reductions in charity care and self-pay discounts as a percentage of revenue. On a consolidated basis, inpatient admissions increased by 1.7% and adjusted admissions increased by 3.5% during the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. On a same-store basis, net operating revenues per adjusted admissions increased 2.1%, while inpatient admissions decreased by 1.8% and adjusted admissions increased by 0.3% during the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2014.

Operating expenses as a percentage of net operating revenues increased from 92.8% during the year ended December 31, 2014 to 93.1% during the year ended December 31, 2015. Operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization and impairment of long-lived assets, as a percentage of net operating revenues, increased from 86.3% for the year ended December 31, 2014 to 86.8% for the year ended December 31, 2015. Salaries and benefits, as a percentage of net operating revenues, increased from 46.2% for the year ended December 31, 2014 to 46.3% for the year ended December 31, 2015. This increase in salaries and benefits, as a percentage of net operating revenues, was primarily due to annual merit increases and increases in physician employment, offset by increased productivity during 2015. Supplies, as a percentage of net operating revenues, increased from 15.4% for the year ended December 31, 2014 to 15.7% for the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily as a result of an increase in drug costs over the prior year. Other operating expenses, as a percentage of net operating revenues, decreased from 23.3% for the year ended December 31, 2014 to 23.2% for the year ended December 31, 2015. This decrease in other operating expenses, as a percentage of net operating revenues, was primarily due to decreases in expenses related to achieving meaningful use compliance and acquisition and integration-related expenses, primarily related to the HMA merger. Government settlement and related costs, as a percentage of net revenues, was 0.5% for the year ended December 31, 2014. There was a nominal amount of government settlement and related costs for the year ended December 31, 2015. Rent, as a percentage of net operating revenues, increased from 2.3% for the years ended December 31, 2014 to 2.4% for the year ended December 31, 2015.

EHR incentive reimbursements represent those incentives under HITECH for which the recognition criterion has been met. We recognized approximately $160 million and $259 million of incentive reimbursements, or 0.8% and 1.4% of net operating revenues, for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We received cash payments of $75 million and $253 million for these incentives during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. No deferred revenue was recorded as of December 31, 2015 and $81 million was recorded as deferred revenue as of December 31, 2014, as all criteria for gain recognition had not been met at that date.

Depreciation and amortization as a percentage of net operating revenues, which for the year ended December 31, 2014 included $75 million of amortization expense recognized for software to be abandoned, decreased from 6.3% for the year ended December 31, 2014 to 6.0% for the year ended December 31, 2015. This decrease was due primarily to the shortening of the remaining useful life of software that was previously in use and impaired during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Impairment for long-lived assets increased by $27 million to $68 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to $41 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. Included in this $68 million amount was an impairment charge of approximately $6 million related to the reporting unit goodwill allocated to one hospital sold during the year ended December 31, 2015 and $62 million related to the impairment of certain long-lived assets for several smaller hospitals recorded in the quarter ended December 31, 2015. These hospitals were identified as having permanent indicators of impairment due to a history of negative operating results and declining volumes, resulting in a decline in projections of future cash flows and estimated fair values. During the year ended December 31, 2014, in connection with the HMA merger, we further analyzed our intangible assets related to internal-use software used in certain of our hospitals for patient and clinical systems, including

software required to meet criteria for meaningful use attestation and ICD-10 compliance. This analysis resulted in management reassessing its usage of certain software products and rationalizing that, with the addition of the HMA hospitals in the first quarter of 2014, those software applications were going to be discontinued and replaced with new applications that better integrated meaningful use and ICD-10 compliance, were more cost effective and could be implemented at a greater efficiency of scale over future implementations. Because of this decision by management, an impairment charge of approximately $24 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2014. In addition, an impairment of $17 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2014 on certain long-lived assets at two of our smaller hospitals due to a reduction in volumes in recent years resulting in a decline in projections of future cash flows and estimated fair values, and one hospital because of our decision to cease operating as an acute care hospital.

Interest expense, net, increased by $1 million to $973 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to $972 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, primarily due to an increase in our average outstanding debt during the year ended December 31, 2015, which was primarily due to the additional debt incurred at the end of January 2014 to acquire HMA, which resulted in an increase in interest expense of $64 million. This increase was offset by a decrease in interest expense of $57 million, which resulted from a decrease in interest rates during the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014, and a decrease in interest expense of $6 million as a result of more interest being capitalized during the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, due to the growth in major construction projects in the current year.

A loss from early extinguishment of debt of $16 million was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2015 resulting from the repayment of certain outstanding term loans as part of the amendment of the Credit Facility. The loss from early extinguishment of debt of $73 million was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2014 resulting from the repayment of the term loans due 2014 as part of the refinancing in the first quarter of 2014.

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, as a percentage of net operating revenues, remained consistent at 0.3% for both the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

The net results of the above mentioned changes resulted in income from continuing operations before income taxes increasing $69 million from $342 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 to $411 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Provision for income taxes from continuing operations increased from $82 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 to $116 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 due to the increase in income from continuing operations before income taxes. Our effective tax rates were 28.4% and 23.8% for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The increase in our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2015 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 was primarily related to a disproportionate substantial increase in income from continuing operations before income taxes, when compared to a decrease in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for those same periods, which is not tax affected in our consolidated financial statements. Including the expense related to income attributable to noncontrolling interests, the effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 would have been 37.6% and 35.5%, respectively.

Income from continuing operations, as a percentage of net operating revenues, increased from 1.4% for the year ended December 31, 2014 to 1.5% for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Discontinued operations for these periods include the results of operations of certain hospitals owned or leased by us as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, which were classified as being held for sale or sold. The operation of these hospitals resulted in a loss, net of taxes, of $27 million included in discontinued operations during the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to a loss, net of taxes, of $7 million included in discontinued operations during the year ended December 31, 2014. An after-tax impairment charge of $5 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2015, based on the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying value of the assets held for sale, including an allocation of reporting unit goodwill, compared to an impairment charge of $50 million during the year ended December 31, 2014. In addition, a loss on the sale of hospitals, net of tax, of

$4 million was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2015. There was no loss on sale of hospitals during the year ended December 31, 2014. Overall, discontinued operations during the year ended December 31, 2015, consisted of a loss, net of taxes, of $36 million, compared to a loss, net of taxes, of $57 million during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Net income, as a percentage of net operating revenues, increased from 1.1% for the year ended December 31, 2014 to 1.3% for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, as a percentage of net operating revenues, decreased from 0.6% for the year ended December 31, 2014 to 0.5% for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Net income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. was $158 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to $92 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in net income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. was primarily due to a decrease in the amortization of software to be abandoned, the government settlement and other related costs, loss from early extinguishment of debt and discontinued operations, as a percentage of net operating revenues, as discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

2016 Compared to 2015

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $216 million, from approximately $921 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to approximately $1.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily the result of an improvement in cash receipts related to the collections of accounts receivable, a decrease in cash outflow related to the timing of payments on supplies and other current assets, and an increase in cash due to the timing of payments on payroll and other employee compensation liabilities, which was impacted by having 26 pay periods in 2016 compared to 27 pay periods in 2015, offset by an increase in cash outflow related to the timing of payments on accounts payable and an increase in payments on professional liability claims. Total cash paid for interest during the year ended December 31, 2016 increased to approximately $930 million compared to $925 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, which is related to the increase in interest rates. Approximately $16 million was received as a net income tax refund for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to approximately $12 million paid for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2015. Included in net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $123 million of cash received for HITECH incentive reimbursements, compared to $75 million received for the year ended December 31, 2015.

The cash provided by investing activities increased $1.7 billion, from approximately $1.1 billion in cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 to approximately $630 million in cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in cash provided by investing activities was primarily due to the distribution received from QHC of $1.2 billion as part of the spin-off transaction, as well as a decrease in the cash used for the purchase of property and equipment of $209 million, and an increase in cash provided by the sale of investments in unconsolidated affiliates of $403 million, related to the sale of our unconsolidated interest in Valley Health System, LLC, a joint venture with UHS representing four hospitals in Las Vegas, Nevada, and Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC, a joint venture with UHS representing one hospital in Las Vegas, Nevada. The increase in cash provided by investing activities was partially offset by an increase in the cash used in the acquisition of facilities and other related equipment of $66 million as a result of the acquisition of three hospitals during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to no hospital acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease in proceeds from the disposition of hospitals and other ancillary operations of $12 million, a decrease in the net impact of the purchases and sales of available-for-sale securities of $35 million and an increase in cash used for other investments (primarily from internal-use software expenditures and physician recruiting costs) of $37 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Included in cash outflows for other investments for the year ended December 31, 2016 is approximately $68 million of capital expenditures related to the purchase and implementation of certified EHR technology, including implementation of Cerner software at several hospital locations. The remaining cash outflows for other

investments for the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily consists of purchases and development of other internal-use software and payments made under non-employee physician recruiting agreements of $174 million. We anticipate being able to fund future routine capital expenditures with cash flows generated from operations.

Our net cash used in financing activities was $1.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $195 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in cash used in financing activities, in comparison to the prior year period, is primarily due to an increase in repayments of our long-term debt of $1.7 billion utilizing the cash received from QHC as part of the spin-off transaction, as well as the proceeds from the sale of our investments in the joint ventures in Las Vegas, Nevada and the sale of an 80% majority ownership in our home care division. Net changes in our financing activity also include a decrease in our long-term borrowings of $43 million, a decrease in the proceeds from our receivables facility of $99 million, a decrease in the proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $25 million and a decrease in proceeds from noncontrolling investors in joint ventures of $47 million. These increases were offset by a decrease in the cash paid to repurchase vested restricted stock for payroll tax withholding requirements of $14 million, a reduction in cash paid for stock buy-backs of $159 million, a reduction in cash paid for deferred financing costs and other debt-related costs of $4 million, a reduction in cash paid for the redemption of noncontrolling investments in joint ventures of $17 million, a reduction in cash paid for the distribution of noncontrolling investments in joint ventures of $8 million, and an increase in proceeds of $159 million from the sale-lease back of certain of our medical office buildings.

The table below sets forth additional detail about our upcoming cash obligations and a further discussion of our existing Credit Facility is set out under the section “Capital Resources” in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K. Other than periodic short-term borrowings on the revolving credit facility, we do not anticipate the need to use funds currently available under our Credit Facility for purposes of funding our operations, although these funds could be used for the purpose of making further acquisitions or for restructuring our existing debt. Furthermore, we anticipate we will remain in compliance with our debt covenants during 2017.

As described in Notes 7, 10 and 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, at December 31, 2016, we had certain cash obligations, which are due as follows (in millions):


	Total		2017		2018-2020		2021-2022		2023 and thereafter
Credit Facility	$	6,606	$	187	$	3,637	$	2,782	$	-
8% Senior Notes due 2019		1,925		-		1,925		-		-
7¹⁄₈% Senior Notes due 2020		1,200		-		1,200		-		-
5¹⁄₈% Senior Secured Notes due 2018		700		-		700		-		-
5¹⁄₈% Senior Secured Notes due 2021		1,000		-		-		1,000		-
6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes due 2022		3,000		-		-		3,000		-
Receivables facility		677		242		435		-		-

Total long-term debt (4)		15,108		429		7,897		6,782		-
Interest on credit facility, notes and receivables facility (1)		2,908		798		1,849		261		-
Capital lease obligations, including interest		461		43		81		42		295
Operating leases		1,077		269		481		143		184
Replacement facilities and other capital commitments (2)		504		118		381		5		-
Open purchase orders (3)		781		734		47		-		-
Liability for uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties		12		-		7		4		1

Total	$	20,851	$	2,391	$	10,743	$	7,237	$	480

(1)

Estimate of interest payments assumes the interest rates at December 31, 2016 remain constant during the period presented for our credit facility and our receivables facility, which are variable rate debt. The interest rate used to calculate interest payments for our credit facility was the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, as of December 31, 2016 plus the applicable spread. The 8% Senior Notes, 7¹⁄₈% Senior Notes, 5¹⁄₈% Senior Secured Notes due 2018 and 2021 and 6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes have fixed rates of interest.

(2)

Pursuant to hospital purchase agreements in effect as of December 31, 2016, we have commitments to build three replacement facilities and the following capital commitments. As part of an acquisition in 2012, we agreed to build a replacement hospital in York, Pennsylvania, by July 2017. Construction costs, including equipment costs, for this replacement facility is currently estimated to be approximately $125 million, of which approximately $17 million has been incurred to date. The Company is required to build replacement facilities in La Porte and Knox, Indiana. The estimated construction costs, including equipment costs, are approximately $125 million and $15 million, respectively. No costs have been incurred to date on those two facilities. In addition, under other purchase agreements, we have committed to spend approximately $464 million for costs such as capital improvements, equipment, selected leases and physician recruiting. These commitments are required to be fulfilled generally over a five to seven year period after acquisition. Through December 31, 2016, we have incurred approximately $209 million related to these commitments.

(3)	Open purchase orders represent our commitment for items or services ordered but not yet received.

(4)	Total long-term debt is exclusive of deferred debt issuance costs of approximately $204 million.

At December 31, 2016, we had issued letters of credit primarily in support of potential insurance related claims and specified outstanding bonds of approximately $55 million.

Our debt as a percentage of total capitalization increased from 81% for the year ended December 31, 2015 to 90% for the year ended December 31, 2016.

2015 Compared to 2014

Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $694 million, from approximately $1.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2014 to approximately $921 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities was primarily the result of higher cash outflows for compensation liabilities, which was impacted by having an additional payroll period in 2015 compared to 2014 (27 pay periods compared to 26 pay periods), an increase in cash outflow related to the timing of payments on accounts payable, an increase in cash payments for legal settlements that were accrued in the prior year, an increase in interest paid based on the timing of scheduled interest payments, a reduction in tax refunds received in excess of taxes paid, and a decrease in the amount of cash received for HITECH incentive reimbursement. These decreases in cash flow were partially offset by a net improvement in accounts receivable compared to the prior year. Total cash paid for interest during the year ended December 31, 2015 increased to approximately $925 million compared to $831 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, which is related to the timing of additional interest payments made in 2015 for the debt financing in January 2014 for the acquisition of HMA. Approximately $12 million was paid for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to a net tax refund of $180 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, where such decreases is related to the timing and recognition of net operating losses in the prior year. Included in net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $75 million of cash received for HITECH incentive reimbursements, compared to $253 million received for the year ended December 31, 2014.

The cash used in investing activities decreased $3.3 billion, from approximately $4.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2014 to approximately $1.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease in cash used in investing activities was primarily due to a decrease in cash paid for acquisitions of facilities and other related equipment of $3.0 billion as a result of the acquisition of HMA during the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to no hospital acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2015, as well as an increase in

2015 in proceeds from the disposition of hospitals and other ancillary operations of $67 million, a decrease in the net impact of the purchases and sales of available-for-sale securities of $28 million and a decrease in cash used for other investments (primarily from internal-use software expenditures) of $306 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. These decreases were offset by a decrease in proceeds from the sale of property and equipment of $35 million and an increase in the cash used for the purchase of property and equipment of $100 million. Included in cash outflows for other investments for the year ended December 31, 2015 is approximately $19 million of capital expenditures related to the purchase and implementation of certified EHR technology, including implementation of Cerner software at several hospital locations. The remaining cash outflows for other investments for the year ended December 31, 2015 consists primarily of purchases and development of other internal-use software and payments made under non-employee physician recruiting agreements of $186 million. We anticipate being able to fund future routine capital expenditures with cash flows generated from operations.

Our net cash used by financing activities was $195 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $2.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities, in comparison to the prior year, is primarily due to a reduction in our long-term borrowings and issuance of long-term debt totaling $8.2 billion, which was mostly offset by a reduction in the repayments of our long-term debt of $4.9 billion, all of which was impacted by the financing transactions in 2014 related to the HMA merger. We also experienced a decrease in the proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $40 million and an increase in cash paid to repurchase stock of $150 million. These decreases were offset by a reduction in cash paid for deferred financing costs and other debt-related costs of $246 million and a reduction in cash paid for the redemption of noncontrolling investments in joint ventures of $122 million.

Capital Expenditures

Cash expenditures for purchases of facilities were $123 million in 2016, $57 million in 2015 and $3.1 billion in 2014. Our expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2016 were primarily related to the purchase of two hospitals in Indiana and one hospital in Arkansas, physician practices and other ancillary services. Our expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2015 were primarily related to physician practices and other ancillary services. No hospital acquisitions occurred during the year ended December 31, 2015. Our expenditures in 2014 were primarily related to the purchase price paid by us in the acquisition of HMA (which owned and operated 71 hospitals at the time of the completion of the HMA merger), the acquisition of four additional hospitals, and the purchase of several surgery centers, physician practices and other ancillary services.

Excluding the cost to construct replacement hospitals, our cash expenditures for routine capital for the year ended December 31, 2016 totaled $732 million, compared to $830 million in 2015 and $733 million in 2014. These capital expenditures related primarily to the purchase of additional equipment, minor renovations and information systems infrastructure. Costs to construct replacement hospitals totaled $12 million in 2016, $123 million in 2015 and $120 million in 2014. The costs to construct replacement hospitals for the year ended December 31, 2016 represented both planning and construction costs for the replacement hospital in York, Pennsylvania. The costs to construct replacement hospitals for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, represented both planning and construction costs for the replacement hospitals in both York, Pennsylvania and Birmingham, Alabama. Completion of the replacement hospital, Grandview Medical Center in Birmingham, Alabama, and transfer of all operations was completed on October 10, 2015.

Pursuant to a hospital purchase agreement in effect as of December 31, 2016, we have committed to build a replacement facility in York, Pennsylvania by July 2017. Construction costs, including equipment costs, for the York replacement facility are currently estimated to be approximately $125 million.

Pursuant to a hospital purchase agreement from our March 1, 2016 acquisition of IU Health La Porte Hospital and IU Health Starke Hospital, we have committed to build replacement facilities in both La Porte, Indiana and Knox, Indiana within five years, or by March 2021. Construction costs, including equipment costs, for the La

Porte and Starke replacement facilities are currently estimated to be approximately $125 million and $15 million, respectively. We expect total capital expenditures of approximately $625 million to $775 million in 2017 (which includes amounts that are required to be expended pursuant to the terms of hospital purchase agreements), including approximately $585 million to $715 million for renovation and equipment cost and approximately $40 million to $60 million for construction and equipment cost of the replacement hospitals in York, Pennsylvania, La Porte, Indiana, and Knox, Indiana.

Capital Resources

Net working capital was approximately $1.8 billion at December 31, 2016, compared to $2.1 billion at December 31, 2015. Adjusting for the net working capital reduction attributed to the spin-off of QHC, net working capital increased by approximately $21 million between December 31, 2015 and 2016. This increase in working capital is primarily due to an increase in cash and a decrease in accounts payable, offset by an increase in employee compensation accrued liabilities and a decrease in other current assets.

We have senior secured financing under a credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions led by Credit Suisse, as administrative agent and collateral agent. In connection with the HMA merger in 2014, we and CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., or CHS, entered into a third amendment and restatement of its Credit Facility, providing for additional financing and recapitalization of certain of our term loans, including (i) the replacement of the revolving credit facility with a new $1.0 billion revolving facility maturing in 2019, or Revolving Facility, (ii) the addition of a new $1.0 billion Term A facility due 2019, or the Term A Facility, (iii) a Term D facility in an aggregate principal amount equal to approximately $4.6 billion due 2021 (which included certain term C loans that were converted into such Term D facility (collectively, the Term D Facility)), (iv) the conversion of certain term C loans into Term E Loans and the borrowing of new Term E Loans in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $1.7 billion due 2017 and (v) the addition of flexibility commensurate with our post-acquisition structure. In addition to funding a portion of the consideration in connection with the HMA merger, some of the proceeds of the Term A Facility and Term D Facility were used to refinance the outstanding $637 million existing term A facility due 2016 and the $60 million of term B loans due 2014, respectively. The Revolving Facility includes a subfacility for letters of credit.

On March 9, 2015, CHS entered into Amendment No. 1 and Incremental Term Loan Assumption Agreement to refinance the existing Term E Loans due 2017 into Term F Loans due 2018, in an original aggregated principal amount of $1.7 billion, or Term F Facility. On May 18, 2015, CHS entered into an Incremental Term Loan Assumption Agreement to provide for a new $1.6 billion incremental Term G facility due 2019, or Term G Facility, and a new approximately $2.9 billion incremental Term H facility due 2021, or Term H Facility. The proceeds of the Term G Facility and Term H Facility were used to repay our existing Term D Facility in full. On April 29, 2016, using part of the cash generated from the QHC spin-off, we repaid approximately $190 million of our Term F Facility. On December 30, 2016, using the cash generated from the sale of a majority ownership in our home care division and from the completion of the sale-lease back transaction for ten of our medical office buildings, we repaid approximately $48 million of our Term F Facility, approximately $26 million of our Term A Facility, approximately $52 million of our Term G Facility and $96 million of our Term H Facility.

On December 5, 2016, CHS entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Facility, or Amendment No. 2, to adjust upward the maximum leverage ratios and adjust downward the minimum interest coverage ratio we are required to comply with each fiscal quarter under the financial maintenance covenants in the Credit Facility. In connection with the amendment, we agreed to certain other additional undertakings for the benefit of the lenders under the Revolving Facility and the Term A Facility.

The loans under the Credit Facility bear interest on the outstanding unpaid principal amount at a rate equal to an applicable percentage plus, at our option, either (a) an Alternate Base Rate (as defined) determined by reference to the greater of (1) the Prime Rate (as defined) announced by Credit Suisse or (2) the Federal Funds Effective Rate (as defined) plus 0.50% or (3) the adjusted LIBOR rate on such day for a three-month interest period commencing on the second business day after such day plus 1% or (b) LIBOR. Loans in respect of the

Revolving Facility and the Term A Facility will accrue interest at a rate per annum initially equal to LIBOR plus 2.75%, in the case of LIBOR borrowings, and Alternate Base Rate plus 1.75%, in the case of Alternate Base Rate borrowings. In addition, the margin in respect of the Revolving Facility and the Term A Facility will be subject to adjustment determined by reference to a leverage-based pricing grid. Loans in respect of the Term F Facility will accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.25%, in the case of LIBOR borrowings, and Alternate Base Rate plus 2.25%, in the case of Alternate Base Rate borrowings. The Term G Loan and Term H Loan will accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 2.75% and 3.00%, respectively, in the case of LIBOR borrowings, and Alternate Base Rate plus 1.75% and 2.00%, respectively, in the case of Alternate Base Rate borrowings. The Term G Loan and the Term H Loan are subject to a 1.00% LIBOR floor and a 2.00% Alternate Base Rate floor.

Under the Term A Facility, CHS is required to make amortization payments in aggregate amounts equal to 15% of the original principal amount of the Term A Facility in 2017 and 45% of the original principal amount of the Term A Facility in 2018. Under the Term F Facility, the Term G Facility and the Term H Facility, CHS is required to make amortization payments in aggregate amounts equal to 1% of the original principal amount of the Term F Facility, the Term G Facility, or the Term H Facility, as applicable, each year.

The term loan facility must be prepaid in an amount equal to (1) 100% of the net cash proceeds of certain asset sales and dispositions by us and our subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions and reinvestment rights (provided that, in connection with Amendment No. 2, CHS agreed with the lenders under the Revolving Facility and the Term A Facility not to exercise such reinvestment rights prior to January 1, 2018), (2) 100% of the net cash proceeds of issuances of certain debt obligations or receivables-based financing by us and our subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions, and (3) 50%, subject to reduction to a lower percentage based on our leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Facility generally as the ratio of total debt on the date of determination to our EBITDA, as defined, for the four quarters most recently ended prior to such date), of excess cash flow (as defined) for any year, subject to certain exceptions. Voluntary prepayments and commitment reductions are permitted in whole or in part, without any premium or penalty, subject to minimum prepayment or reduction requirements.

The borrower under the Credit Facility is CHS. All of our obligations under the Credit Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by Community Health Systems, Inc. and certain of its existing and subsequently acquired or organized domestic subsidiaries. All obligations under the Credit Facility and the related guarantees are secured by a perfected first priority lien or security interest in substantially all of the assets of Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS and each subsidiary guarantor, including equity interests held by us or any subsidiary guarantor, but excluding, among others, the equity interests of non-significant subsidiaries, syndication subsidiaries, securitization subsidiaries and joint venture subsidiaries. Such assets constitute substantially the same assets, subject to certain exceptions, that secure CHS’ obligations under its outstanding senior secured notes.

We have agreed to pay letter of credit fees equal to the applicable percentage then in effect with respect to LIBOR borrowings under the Revolving Facility times the maximum aggregate amount available to be drawn under all letters of credit outstanding under the subfacility for letters of credit. The issuer of any letter of credit issued under the subfacility for letters of credit will also receive a customary fronting fee and other customary processing charges. We are obligated to pay commitment fees of 0.50% per annum (subject to adjustment based upon our leverage ratio), on the unused portion of the Revolving Facility.

The Credit Facility contains customary representations and warranties, subject to limitations and exceptions, and customary covenants restricting our and our subsidiaries’ ability, subject to certain exceptions, to, among other things, (1) declare dividends, make distributions or redeem or repurchase capital stock, (2) prepay, redeem or repurchase other debt, (3) incur liens or grant negative pledges, (4) make loans and investments and enter into acquisitions and joint ventures, (5) incur additional indebtedness or provide certain guarantees, (6) make capital expenditures, (7) engage in mergers, acquisitions and asset sales, (8) conduct transactions with affiliates, (9) alter the nature of our businesses, (10) grant certain guarantees with respect to physician practices, (11) engage in sale and leaseback transactions or (12) change our fiscal year. We and our subsidiaries are also required to comply

with specified financial covenants (consisting of a maximum secured net leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio) and various affirmative covenants. Under the Credit Facility, the secured net leverage ratio is calculated as the ratio of total secured debt, less unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, to consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Facility, and the interest coverage ratio is the ratio of consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Facility, to consolidated interest expense for the period. The calculation of consolidated EBITDA as defined in the Credit Facility is a trailing 12-month calculation that begins with net income attributable to us, with certain pro forma adjustments to consider the impact of material acquisitions or divestitures, and adjustments for interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, stock compensation expense, restructuring costs, and the financial impact of other non-cash or non-recurring items recorded during any such 12-month period. For the 12-month period ended December 31, 2016, the secured net leverage ratio financial covenant in the Credit Facility limited the ratio of secured debt to EBITDA, as defined, to less than or equal to 4.50 to 1.00, which will decrease to 4.00 to 1.00 on January 1, 2018. For the 12-month period ended December 31, 2016, the interest coverage ratio financial covenant in the Credit Facility required the ratio of consolidated EBITDA, as defined, to consolidated interest expense to be greater than or equal to 2.00 to 1.00, which will increase to 2.25 to 1.00 on January 1, 2018. We were in compliance with all such covenants at December 31, 2016, with a secured net leverage ratio of approximately 3.96 to 1.00 and an interest coverage ratio of approximately 2.43 to 1.00.

Events of default under the Credit Facility include, but are not limited to, (1) our failure to pay principal, interest, fees or other amounts under the credit agreement when due (taking into account any applicable grace period), (2) any representation or warranty proving to have been materially incorrect when made, (3) covenant defaults subject, with respect to certain covenants, to an available cure through the issuance of qualified equity for a period of 60 days after the end of the first three quarters and 100 days after a year end, (4) bankruptcy and insolvency events, (5) a cross default to certain other debt, (6) certain undischarged judgments (not paid within an applicable grace period), (7) a change of control (as defined), (8) certain ERISA-related defaults and (9) the invalidity or impairment of specified security interests, guarantees or subordination provisions in favor of the administrative agent or lenders under the Credit Facility.

As of December 31, 2016, the availability for additional borrowings under our Credit Facility, subject to certain limitations as set forth in the Credit Facility, was $1.0 billion pursuant to the Revolving Facility, of which $55 million was set aside for outstanding letters of credit. We believe that these funds, along with internally generated cash and continued access to the capital markets, will be sufficient to finance future acquisitions, capital expenditures and working capital requirements during the next 12 months.

In connection with the consummation of the HMA merger, CHS issued: (i) $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 5¹⁄₈% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, or the 2021 Senior Secured Notes, pursuant to an indenture, as supplemented, dated as of January 27, 2014, collectively, the Secured Indenture, by and among CHS, the Parent Company, the other guarantors from time to time party thereto, Regions Bank, as trustee, and Credit Suisse AG, as collateral agent, or the Collateral Agent and (ii) $3.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes due 2022, or the 6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes, pursuant to an indenture, as supplemented, dated as of January 27, 2014, collectively, the Unsecured Indenture, by and among CHS, the Parent Company, the other guarantors from time to time party thereto, and Regions Bank, as trustee, or the Unsecured Indenture.

On November 22, 2011, CHS completed its offering of $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 8% Senior Notes due 2019, which were issued in a private placement. On March 21, 2012, CHS completed an offering of an additional $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 8% Senior Notes, which were issued in a private placement (at a premium of 102.5%). The net proceeds from these issuances were used to finance the purchase of approximately $1.85 billion aggregate principal amount of CHS’ then outstanding 8⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes, to pay related fees and expenses and for general corporate purposes. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we repurchased approximately $75 million of the approximately $2 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of the 8% Senior Notes due 2019 in open market transactions.

On July 18, 2012, CHS completed an underwritten public offering under an automatic shelf registration statement filed with the SEC of $1.2 billion aggregate principal amount of 7¹⁄₈% Senior Notes due 2020. The net

proceeds of the offering were used to finance the purchase or redemption of the then outstanding $934 million principal amount plus accrued interest of the 8⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes, to pay for consents delivered in connection with a related tender offer, to pay related fees and expenses, and for general corporate purposes.

On August 17, 2012, CHS completed an underwritten public offering under an automatic shelf registration statement filed with the SEC of $1.6 billion aggregate principal amount of 5¹⁄₈% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, or the 2018 Senior Secured Notes. Both the 2018 Senior Secured Notes and the 2021 Senior Secured Notes are secured by a first-priority lien subject to a shared lien of equal priority with certain other obligations, including obligations under the Credit Facility, and subject to prior ranking liens permitted by the indentures governing the 2018 Senior Secured Notes and the 2021 Senior Secured Notes on substantially the same assets, subject to certain exceptions, that secure CHS’ obligations under the Credit Facility. The net proceeds of the offering, together with available cash on hand, were used to finance the prepayment of $1.6 billion of the outstanding term loans due 2014 under the Credit Facility and related fees and expenses. On May 16, 2016, using part of the cash generated from the QHC spin-off, we completed a cash tender offer for $900 million of the approximately $1.6 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of the 2018 Senior Secured Notes.

On March 21, 2012, through certain of its subsidiaries, CHS entered into an accounts receivable loan agreement, or the Receivables Facility, with a group of lenders and banks, Credit Agricolé Corporate and Investment Bank, as a managing agent and as the administrative agent, and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as a managing agent. On March 7, 2013, CHS and certain of its subsidiaries amended the Receivables Facility to add an additional managing agent, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., to increase the size of the facility from $300 million to $500 million and to extend the scheduled termination date. Additional subsidiaries also agreed to participate in the Receivables Facility as of that date. On March 31, 2014, CHS and certain of its subsidiaries amended the Receivables Facility to increase the size of the facility from $500 million to $700 million and to extend the scheduled termination date. Additional subsidiaries also agreed to participate in the Receivables Facility as of that date. On November 13, 2015, CHS and certain of its subsidiaries amended the Receivables Facility to extend the scheduled termination date and amend certain other provisions thereof. On November 18, 2016, CHS and certain of its subsidiaries amended the Receivables Facility to extend the scheduled termination date in respect of a $450 million portion of the commitments thereunder and amend certain other provisions thereof. The existing and future non-self pay patient-related accounts receivable, or the Receivables, for certain affiliated hospitals serve as collateral for the outstanding borrowings under the Receivables Facility. The interest rate on the borrowings is based on the commercial paper rate plus an applicable interest rate spread. Unless earlier terminated or subsequently extended pursuant to its terms, the Receivables Facility will expire on November 13, 2017 in respect of a $250 million portion of the commitments thereunder and November 13, 2018 in respect of the remaining $450 million of commitments thereunder, subject to customary termination events that could cause an early termination date. CHS maintains effective control over the Receivables because, pursuant to the terms of the Receivables Facility, the Receivables are sold from certain of CHS’ subsidiaries to CHS, and CHS then sells or contributes the Receivables to a special-purpose entity that is wholly-owned by CHS. The wholly-owned special-purpose entity in turn grants security interests in the Receivables in exchange for borrowings obtained from the group of third-party lenders and banks of up to $700 million outstanding from time to time based on the availability of eligible Receivables and other customary factors. The wholly-owned special-purpose entity is not a subsidiary guarantor under the Credit Facility or CHS’ outstanding notes. The group of third-party lenders and banks do not have recourse to CHS or its subsidiaries beyond the assets of the wholly-owned special-purpose entity that collateralizes the loan. The Receivables and other assets of the wholly-owned special-purpose entity will be available first and foremost to satisfy the claims of the creditors of such entity. The outstanding borrowings pursuant to the Receivables Facility at December 31, 2016 totaled $677 million with approximately $435 million classified as long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet. At December 31, 2016, the carrying amount of Receivables included in the Receivables Facility totaled approximately $1.7 billion and is included in patient accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheet.

As of December 31, 2016, we are currently a party to the following interest rate swap agreements to limit the effect of changes in interest rates on approximately 36.1% of our variable rate debt. On each of these swaps, we receive a variable rate of interest based on the three-month LIBOR, in exchange for the payment by us of a fixed

rate of interest. We currently pay, on a quarterly basis, interest on the Revolving Facility and the Term A Facility at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 2.75%. Loans in respect of the Term F Facility accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.25%. The Term G Loan and Term H Loan accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 2.75% and 3.00%, respectively, in the case of LIBOR borrowings, and Alternate Base Rate plus 1.75% and 2.00%, respectively, in the case of Alternate Base Rate Borrowings. The Term G Loan and the Term H Loan are subject to a 1.00% LIBOR floor and a 2.00% Alternate Base Rate floor.


Swap #	Notional Amount (in millions)		Fixed Interest Rate			Termination Date		Fair Value (in millions)
1	$	200		2.055	%		July 25, 2019	$	3
2		200		2.059	%		July 25, 2019		2
3		400		1.882	%		August 30, 2019		3
4		200		2.515	%		August 30, 2019		5
5		200		2.613	%		August 30, 2019		5
6		300		2.041	%		August 30, 2020		2
7		300		2.738	%		August 30, 2020		9
8		300		2.892	%		August 30, 2020		11
9		300		2.363	%		January 27, 2021		5
10		200		2.368	%		January 27, 2021		4

The swaps that were in effect prior to the HMA merger remain in effect after the refinancing for the HMA merger and will continue to be used to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on portions of our amended credit facility.

The Credit Facility and the indentures that govern our outstanding notes contain various covenants that limit our ability to take certain actions, including our ability to:

•

incur, assume or guarantee additional indebtedness;

•

issue redeemable stock and preferred stock;

•

repurchase capital stock;

•

make restricted payments, including paying dividends and making certain loans, acquisitions and investments;

•

redeem debt that is subordinated in right of payment to our outstanding notes;

•

create liens;

•

sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of subsidiaries;

•

impair the security interests;

•

enter into agreements that restrict dividends and certain other payments from subsidiaries;

•

merge, consolidate, sell or otherwise dispose of substantially all of our assets;

•

enter into transactions with affiliates; and

•

guarantee certain obligations.

In addition, our Credit Facility contains restrictive covenants and requires us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy other financial condition tests. Our ability to meet these restricted covenants and financial ratios and tests can be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we will meet those tests. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under our Credit Facility and/or the indentures that govern our outstanding notes. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under our Credit Facility or indentures

that govern our outstanding notes, all amounts outstanding under our Credit Facility and the indentures that govern our outstanding notes may become immediately due and payable and all commitments under the Credit Facility to extend further credit may be terminated.

We believe that internally generated cash flows, availability for additional borrowings under our Credit Facility, subject to certain limitations as set forth in the Credit Facility, of $1.0 billion (consisting of a $1.0 billion Revolving Facility, of which $55 million is in the form of outstanding letters of credit) and our ability to amend the Credit Facility to provide for one or more tranches of term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1.5 billion, only $750 million of which is effectively available because of our additional undertakings in connection with Amendment No. 2, and our continued access to the capital markets will be sufficient to finance acquisitions, capital expenditures, working capital requirements, and any equity or debt repurchases or other debt repayments we may elect to make through the next 12 months. In addition, we may elect to utilize proceeds received from any dispositions of hospitals or investments to repay outstanding debt.

We may elect from time to time to purchase our common stock under our open market repurchase program adopted on November 6, 2015, which authorizes us to purchase up to 10,000,000 shares of our common stock, not to exceed $300 million in repurchases (we have currently repurchased 532,188 shares under such program, all of which shares were repurchased during the three months ended December 31, 2015). In addition, we may elect from time to time to purchase our outstanding debt in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Any such equity or debt repurchases will depend upon prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, applicable securities laws requirements, and other factors.

On May 6, 2015, we filed a universal automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3ASR that will permit us, from time to time, in one or more public offerings, to offer debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, warrants, depositary shares, or any combination of such securities. The shelf registration statement will also permit our subsidiary, CHS, to offer debt securities that would be guaranteed by us, from time to time in one or more public offerings. The terms of any such future offerings would be established at the time of the offering.

The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is a measure of our ability to meet our fixed obligations related to our indebtedness. The following table shows the ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the periods indicated:

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)

1.69 x

1.51 x

1.29 x

1.36 x

(1)	Fixed charges include interest expensed and capitalized during the year plus an estimate of the interest component of rent expense. There are no shares of preferred stock outstanding. See exhibit 12 filed as part of this Report for the calculation of this ratio.

*	For the year ended December 31, 2016, earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by approximately $1.7 billion.

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

In the past, we have utilized operating leases as a financing tool for obtaining the operations of specified hospitals without acquiring, through ownership, the related assets of the hospital and without a significant outlay of cash at the front end of the lease. We utilize the same operating strategies to improve operations at those hospitals held under operating leases as we do at those hospitals that we own. We have not entered into any operating leases for hospital operations since December 2000. At December 31, 2016, we operated two hospitals under operating leases that had an immaterial impact on our consolidated operating results. The terms of the two operating leases we currently have in place expire between December 2020 and June 2028, not including lease extension options. If we allow these leases to expire, we would no longer generate revenues nor incur expenses from these hospitals.

As described more fully in Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, at December 31, 2016, we have certain cash obligations for a replacement facility and other construction commitments of $504 million and open purchase orders for $781 million.

Noncontrolling Interests

We have sold noncontrolling interests in certain of our subsidiaries or acquired subsidiaries with existing noncontrolling interest ownership positions. As of December 31, 2016, we have hospitals in 23 of the markets we serve, with noncontrolling physician ownership interests ranging from less than 1% to 40%, including one hospital that also has a non-profit entity as a partner. In addition, we have 9 other hospitals with noncontrolling interests owned by non-profit entities. Redeemable noncontrolling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries was $554 million and $571 million as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and noncontrolling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries was $113 million and $86 million as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The amount of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was $95 million, $101 million and $111 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As a result of the change in the Stark Law “whole hospital” exception included in the Affordable Care Act, we are not permitted to introduce physician ownership at any of our hospital facilities that did not have physician ownership at the time of the adoption of the Affordable Care Act, or increase the aggregate percentage of physician ownership in any of our former or existing hospital joint ventures in excess of the aggregate physician ownership level held at the time of the adoption of the Affordable Care Act.

Reimbursement, Legislative and Regulatory Changes

Ongoing legislative and regulatory efforts could reduce or otherwise adversely affect the payments we receive from Medicare and Medicaid. Within the statutory framework of the Medicare and Medicaid programs, including programs currently unaffected by the Affordable Care Act, there are substantial areas subject to administrative rulings, interpretations and discretion which may further affect payments made under those programs, and the federal and state governments might, in the future, reduce the funds available under those programs or require more stringent utilization and quality reviews of hospital facilities. Additionally, there may be a continued rise in managed care programs and additional restructuring of the financing and delivery of healthcare in the United States. These events could cause our future financial results to decline. We cannot estimate the impact of Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement changes that have been enacted or are under consideration. We cannot predict whether additional reimbursement reductions will be made or whether any such changes would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, results of operations, cash flow, capital resources and liquidity.

Inflation

The healthcare industry is labor intensive. Wages and other expenses increase during periods of inflation and when labor shortages occur in the marketplace. In addition, our suppliers pass along rising costs to us in the form of higher prices. We have implemented cost control measures, including our case and resource management program, to curb increases in operating costs and expenses. We have generally offset increases in operating costs by increasing reimbursement for services, expanding services and reducing costs in other areas. However, we cannot predict our ability to cover or offset future cost increases, particularly any increases in our cost of providing health insurance benefits to our employees as a result of the Affordable Care Act.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that our critical accounting policies are limited to those described below.

Third-party Reimbursement

Net operating revenues include amounts estimated by management to be reimbursable by Medicare and Medicaid under prospective payment systems and provisions of cost-reimbursement and other payment methods. In addition, we are reimbursed by non-governmental payors using a variety of payment methodologies. Amounts we receive for treatment of patients covered by these programs are generally less than the standard billing rates. Contractual allowances are automatically calculated and recorded through our internally developed “automated contractual allowance system.” Within the automated system, payors’ historical paid claims data are utilized to calculate the contractual allowances. This data is automatically updated on a monthly basis. All hospital contractual allowance calculations are subjected to monthly review by management to ensure reasonableness and accuracy. We account for the differences between the estimated program reimbursement rates and the standard billing rates as contractual allowance adjustments, which we deduct from gross revenues to arrive at operating revenues (net of contractual allowances and discounts). The process of estimating contractual allowances requires us to estimate the amount expected to be received based on payor contract provisions. The key assumption in this process is the estimated contractual reimbursement percentage, which is based on payor classification and historical paid claims data. Our automated contractual allowance system does not maintain the contractual allowance at the patient account level as it estimates an average contractual allowance by payor classification. Due to the complexities involved in these estimates, actual payments we receive could be different from the amounts we estimate and record. If the actual contractual reimbursement percentage under government programs and managed care contracts differed by 1% at December 31, 2016 from our estimated reimbursement percentage, net (loss) income for the year ended December 31, 2016 would have changed by approximately $93 million, and net accounts receivable at December 31, 2016 would have changed by $123 million. Final settlements under some of these programs are subject to adjustment based on administrative review and audit by third parties. We account for adjustments to previous program reimbursement estimates as contractual allowance adjustments and report them in the periods that such adjustments become known. Contractual allowance adjustments related to final settlements and previous program reimbursement estimates impacted net operating revenues and net (loss) income by an insignificant amount in each of the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Substantially all of our accounts receivable are related to providing healthcare services to patients at our hospitals and affiliated businesses. Collection of these accounts receivable is our primary source of cash and is critical to our operating performance. Our primary collection risks relate to uninsured patients and outstanding patient balances for which the primary insurance payor has paid some but not all of the outstanding balance, with the remaining outstanding balance (generally deductibles and co-payments) owed by the patient. For all procedures scheduled in advance, our policy is to verify insurance coverage prior to the date of the procedure. Insurance coverage is not verified in advance of procedures for walk-in and emergency room patients.

We estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts by reserving a percentage of all self-pay accounts receivable without regard to aging category, based on collection history, adjusted for expected recoveries and any anticipated changes in trends. Our ability to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts is not impacted by not utilizing an aging of our net accounts receivable as we believe that substantially all of the risk exists at the point in time such accounts are identified as self-pay. For all other non-self-pay payor categories, we reserve an estimated amount based on historical collection rates for the uncontractualized portion of all accounts aging over 365 days from the date of discharge. These amounts represent an immaterial percentage of our outstanding accounts receivable. The percentage used to reserve for all self-pay accounts is based on our collection history. We believe that we collect substantially all of our third-party insured receivables, which include receivables from governmental agencies.

Collections are impacted by the economic ability of patients to pay and the effectiveness of our collection efforts. Significant changes in payor mix, business office operations, economic conditions or trends in federal and state governmental healthcare coverage could affect our collection of accounts receivable and are considered in our estimates of accounts receivable collectability. If the actual collection percentage differed by 1% at December 31, 2016 from our estimated collection percentage as a result of a change in expected recoveries, net (loss) income for the year ended December 31, 2016 would have changed by $60 million, and net accounts receivable at December 31, 2016 would have changed by $80 million. We also continually review our overall reserve adequacy by monitoring historical cash collections as a percentage of trailing net revenue less provision for bad debts, as well as by analyzing current period net revenue and admissions by payor classification, days revenue outstanding, the composition of self-pay receivables between pure self-pay patients and the patient responsibility portion of third-party insured receivables and the impact of recent acquisitions and dispositions.

Our policy is to write-off gross accounts receivable if the balance is under $10.00 or when such amounts are placed with outside collection agencies. We believe this policy accurately reflects our ongoing collection efforts and is consistent with industry practices. We had approximately $3.9 billion and $4.0 billion at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, being pursued by various outside collection agencies. We expect to collect less than 3%, net of estimated collection fees, of the amounts being pursued by outside collection agencies. As these amounts have been written-off, they are not included in our gross accounts receivable or our allowance for doubtful accounts. Collections on amounts previously written-off are recognized as a reduction to bad debt expense when received. However, we take into consideration estimated collections of these future amounts written-off in evaluating the reasonableness of our allowance for doubtful accounts.

All of the following information is derived from our hospitals, excluding clinics, unless otherwise noted.

Patient accounts receivable from our hospitals represent approximately 95% of our total consolidated accounts receivable.

Days revenue outstanding, adjusted for the impact of receivables for state Medicaid supplemental payment programs, was 63 days at both December 31, 2016 and 2015. Our target range for days revenue outstanding is from 60 to 65 days.

Total gross accounts receivable (prior to allowance for contractual adjustments and doubtful accounts) was approximately $19.7 billion as of December 31, 2016 and approximately $20.5 billion as of December 31, 2015. The approximate percentage of total gross accounts receivable (prior to contractual adjustments and the allowance for doubtful accounts) summarized by aging categories is as follows:

As of December 31, 2016:


	% of Gross Receivables
Payor	0 - 90 Days			90 - 180 Days			180 - 365 Days			Over 365 Days
Medicare		14	%		1	%		-	%		-	%
Medicaid		7	%		2	%		1	%		1	%
Managed Care and Other		25	%		4	%		3	%		2	%
Self-Pay		9	%		6	%		14	%		11	%

As of December 31, 2015:


	% of Gross Receivables
Payor	0 - 90 Days			90 - 180 Days			180 - 365 Days			Over 365 Days
Medicare		14	%		1	%		-	%		-	%
Medicaid		9	%		2	%		1	%		1	%
Managed Care and Other		24	%		4	%		3	%		2	%
Self-Pay		9	%		7	%		12	%		11	%

The approximate percentage of total gross accounts receivable (prior to allowances for contractual adjustments and doubtful accounts) summarized by payor is as follows:


	December 31,
	2016			2015
Insured receivables		59.8	%		60.6	%
Self-pay receivables		40.2			39.4

Total		100.0	%		100.0	%

For the hospital segment, the combined total of the allowance for doubtful accounts for self-pay accounts receivable and related allowances for other self-pay discounts and contractuals, as a percentage of gross self-pay receivables, was approximately 89% and 88% at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. If the receivables that have been written-off, but where collections are still being pursued by outside collection agencies, were included in both the allowances and gross self-pay receivables specified above, the percentage of combined allowances to total self-pay receivables would have been approximately 93% and 92% at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

Goodwill represents the excess of the fair value of the consideration conveyed in the acquisition over the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment at the same time every year and when an event occurs or circumstances change that, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. There is a two-step method for determining goodwill impairment. Step one is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit with the unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill. If this test indicates the fair value is less than the carrying value, then step two is required to compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. Our most recent annual goodwill evaluation was performed during the fourth quarter of 2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we allocated approximately $709 million of goodwill to the spin-off of QHC, including approximately $33 million of goodwill related to the former management services reporting unit and approximately $676 million of goodwill allocated from the hospital operations reporting unit based on a relative fair value calculation of the hospitals that were included in the QHC distribution. We allocated approximately $365 million of goodwill to hospitals held for sale based on a calculation of the relative fair value of those hospitals compared to the total hospital reporting unit goodwill. Additionally, we allocated approximately $46 million of goodwill related to the sale of the majority ownership interest in the home care operations reporting unit on December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2016, after giving effect to the disposition of QHC, the sale of an 80% majority ownership interest in our home care division, and the $1.395 billion impairment charge, as discussed below, we had approximately $6.5 billion of goodwill recorded, all of which resides at our hospital operations reporting unit.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, we identified certain indicators of impairment requiring an interim goodwill impairment evaluation. Those indicators were primarily the decline in our market capitalization and fair value of long-term debt during the three months ended June 30, 2016, and a decline in our projected future earnings compared to our most recent annual evaluation. We performed an estimated calculation of fair value in step one of the impairment test at June 30, 2016, which indicated that the carrying value of our hospital operations reporting unit exceeded its fair value. An initial step two calculation was performed to determine the implied value of goodwill in a hypothetical purchase price allocation. We recorded an estimated non-cash impairment charge of $1.4 billion to goodwill at June 30, 2016 based on these analyses, and adjusted the estimated impairment charge based on the final step two valuation of $1.395 billion at September 30, 2016.

The Company performed its annual goodwill evaluation during the fourth quarter of 2016. No impairment was indicated by this evaluation. The next annual goodwill evaluation will be performed during the fourth quarter of

2017. While no impairment was indicated by this evaluation, the reduction in our fair value and the resulting goodwill impairment charge recorded during 2016 reduced the excess of fair value calculated in the step two analysis over the carrying value of our hospital operations reporting unit to an amount less than 1% of our carrying value. This minimal amount in the excess fair value over carrying value of our hospital operations reporting unit increases the risk that future declines in fair value could result in goodwill impairment. The determination of fair value in step one of our goodwill impairment analysis is based on an estimate of fair value for each reporting unit utilizing known and estimated inputs at the evaluation date. Some of those inputs include, but are not limited to, the most recent price of our common stock or fair value of our long-term debt, estimates of future revenue and expense growth, estimated market multiples, expected capital expenditures, income tax rates, and costs of invested capital. Future estimates of fair value could be adversely affected if the actual outcome of one or more of these assumptions changes materially in the future, including further decline in our stock price or fair value of our long-term debt, lower than expected hospital volumes, or increased operating costs. Such changes impacting the calculation of our fair value could result in a material impairment charge in the future.

Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets

Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values of certain long-lived assets may be impaired, we project the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by these assets. If the projections indicate that the reported amounts are not expected to be recovered, such amounts are reduced to their estimated fair value based on a quoted market price, if available, or an estimate based on valuation techniques available in the circumstances.

Professional Liability Claims

As part of our business of owning and operating hospitals, we are subject to legal actions alleging liability on our part. We accrue for losses resulting from such liability claims, as well as loss adjustment expenses that are out-of-pocket and directly related to such liability claims. These direct out-of-pocket expenses include fees of outside counsel and experts. We do not accrue for costs that are part of our corporate overhead, such as the costs of our in-house legal and risk management departments. The losses resulting from professional liability claims primarily consist of estimates for known claims, as well as estimates for incurred but not reported claims. The estimates are based on specific claim facts, our historical claim reporting and payment patterns, the nature and level of our hospital operations, and actuarially determined projections. The actuarially determined projections are based on our actual claim data, including historic reporting and payment patterns which have been gathered over approximately a 20-year period. As discussed below, since we purchase excess insurance on a claims-made basis that transfers risk to third-party insurers, the liability we accrue does include an amount for the losses covered by our excess insurance. We also record a receivable for the expected reimbursement of losses covered by our excess insurance. Since we believe that the amount and timing of our future claims payments are reliably determinable, we discount the amount we accrue for losses resulting from professional liability claims using the risk-free interest rate corresponding to the timing of our expected payments.

Our processes for obtaining and analyzing claims and incident data are standardized across all of our hospitals and have been consistent for many years. We monitor the outcomes of the medical care services that we provide and for each reported claim, we obtain various information concerning the facts and circumstances related to that claim. In addition, we routinely monitor current key statistics and volume indicators in our assessment of utilizing historical trends. The average lag period between claim occurrence and payment of a final settlement is between four and five years, although the facts and circumstances of individual claims could result in the timing

of such payments being different from this average. Since claims are paid promptly after settlement with the claimant is reached, settled claims represent approximately 1.0% of the total liability at the end of any period.

For purposes of estimating our individual claim accruals, we utilize specific claim information, including the nature of the claim, the expected claim amount, the year in which the claim occurred and the laws of the jurisdiction in which the claim occurred. Once the case accruals for known claims are determined, information is stratified by loss layers and retentions, accident years, reported years, geography, and claims relating to the acquired HMA hospitals versus claims relating to our other hospitals. Several actuarial methods are used against this data to produce estimates of ultimate paid losses and reserves for incurred but not reported claims. Each of these methods uses our company-specific historical claims data and other information. This company-specific data includes information regarding our business, including historical paid losses and loss adjustment expenses, historical and current case loss reserves, actual and projected hospital statistical data, a variety of hospital census information, employed physician information, professional liability retentions for each policy year, geographic information and other data.

Based on these analyses, we determine our estimate of the professional liability claims. The determination of management’s estimate, including the preparation of the reserve analysis that supports such estimate, involves subjective judgment of management. Changes in reserving data or the trends and factors that influence reserving data may signal fundamental shifts in our future claim development patterns or may simply reflect single-period anomalies. Even if a change reflects a fundamental shift, the full extent of the change may not become evident until years later. Moreover, since our methods and models use different types of data and we select our liability from the results of all of these methods, we typically cannot quantify the precise impact of such factors on our estimates of the liability. Due to our standardized and consistent processes for handling claims and the long history and depth of our company-specific data, our methodologies have produced reliably determinable estimates of ultimate paid losses.


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Accrual for professional liability claims, beginning of year	$	901		$	924		$	644

Liability for insured claims (1)		(15	)		3			6
Liability transferred to QHC		(5	)		-			-
Liability acquired through HMA merger:
Gross liability acquired		-			-			292
Discount of liability acquired		-			-			(7	)

Discounted liability acquired		-			-			285
Expense (income) related to:
Current accident year		199			183			179
Prior accident years		(87	)		(60	)		(51	)
Expense (income) from discounting		3			5			(7	)

Total incurred loss and loss expense (2)		115			128			121

Paid claims and expenses related to:
Current accident year		-			-			-
Prior accident years		(208	)		(154	)		(132	)

Total paid claims and expenses		(208	)		(154	)		(132	)

Accrual for professional liability claims, end of year	$	788		$	901		$	924

(1)

The liability for insured claims is recorded on the consolidated balance sheet with a corresponding insurance recovery receivable.

(2)

Total expense, including premiums for insured coverage, was $162 million in 2016, $174 million in 2015 and $170 million in 2014.

The impact of risk management patient safety quality programs and initiatives implemented at our hospitals, as well as decreasing obstetric admissions, surgeries and admissions, resulted in the current accident year expense decreasing, as a percentage of net operating revenues, for each year presented. Income related to prior accident years reflects changes in estimates resulting from the filing of claims for prior year incidents, claim settlements, updates from litigation and our ongoing investigation of open claims. Expense/income from discounting reflects the changes in the weighted-average risk-free interest rate used and timing of estimated payments for discounting in each year.

We are primarily self-insured for these claims; however, we obtain excess insurance that transfers the risk of loss to a third-party insurer for claims in excess of our self-insured retentions. Our excess insurance is underwritten on a claims-made basis. For claims reported prior to June 1, 2002, substantially all of our professional and general liability risks were subject to a less than $1 million per occurrence self-insured retention and for claims reported from June 1, 2002 through June 1, 2003, these self-insured retentions were $2 million per occurrence. Substantially all claims reported after June 1, 2003 and before June 1, 2005 are self-insured up to $4 million per claim. Substantially all claims reported on or after June 1, 2005 and before June 1, 2014 are self-insured up to $5 million per claim. Substantially all claims reported on or after June 1, 2014 are self-insured up to $10 million per claim. Management, on occasion, has selectively increased the insured risk at certain hospitals based upon insurance pricing and other factors and may continue that practice in the future. Excess insurance for all hospitals has been purchased through commercial insurance companies and generally covers us for liabilities in excess of the self-insured retentions. The excess coverage consists of multiple layers of insurance, the sum of which totals up to $95 million per occurrence and in the aggregate for claims reported on or after June 1, 2003, up to $145 million per occurrence and in the aggregate for claims reported on or after January 1, 2008, up to $195 million per occurrence and in the aggregate for claims reported on or after June 1, 2010, and up to $220 million per occurrence and in the aggregate for claims reported on or after June 1, 2015. In addition, for integrated occurrence malpractice claims, there is an additional $50 million of excess coverage for claims reported on or after June 1, 2014 and an additional $75 million of excess coverage for claims reported on or after June 1, 2015. For certain policy years prior to June 1, 2014, if the first aggregate layer of excess coverage becomes fully utilized, then the self-insured retention will increase to $10 million per claim for any subsequent claims in that policy year until our total aggregate coverage is met.

Effective June 1, 2014, the hospitals acquired from HMA were insured on a claims-made basis as described above and through commercial insurance companies as described above for substantially all claims reported on or after June 1, 2014 except for physician-related claims with an occurrence date prior to June 1, 2014. Prior to June 1, 2014, the former HMA hospitals obtained insurance coverage through a wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiary and a risk retention group subsidiary which are domiciled in the Cayman Islands and South Carolina, respectively. Those insurance subsidiaries, which are collectively referred to as the “Insurance Subsidiaries,” provided (i) claims-made coverage to all of the former HMA hospitals and (ii) occurrence-basis coverage to most of the physicians employed by the former HMA hospitals. The employed physicians not covered by the Insurance Subsidiaries generally maintained claims-made policies with unrelated third party insurance companies. To mitigate the exposure of the program covering the former HMA hospitals and other healthcare facilities, the Insurance Subsidiaries bought claims-made reinsurance policies from unrelated third parties for claims above self-retention levels of $10 million or $15 million per claim, depending on the policy year.

Effective January 1, 2008, the former Triad hospitals were insured on a claims-made basis as described above and through commercial insurance companies as described above for substantially all claims occurring on or after January 1, 2002 and reported on or after January 1, 2008. Substantially all losses for the former Triad hospitals in periods prior to May 1, 1999 were insured through a wholly-owned insurance subsidiary of HCA Holdings, Inc., or HCA, Triad’s owner prior to that time, and excess loss policies maintained by HCA. HCA has agreed to indemnify the former Triad hospitals in respect of claims covered by such insurance policies arising prior to May 1, 1999. From May 1, 1999 through December 31, 2006, the former Triad hospitals obtained insurance coverage on a claims incurred basis from HCA’s wholly-owned insurance subsidiary with excess coverage obtained from other carriers that is subject to certain deductibles. Effective for claims incurred after

December 31, 2006, Triad began insuring its claims from $1 million to $5 million through its wholly-owned captive insurance company, replacing the coverage provided by HCA. Substantially all claims occurring during 2007 were self-insured up to $10 million per claim.

Income Taxes

We must make estimates in recording provision for income taxes, including determination of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities and any valuation allowances that might be required against the deferred tax assets. We believe that future income will enable us to realize certain deferred tax assets, subject to the valuation allowance we have established.

The total amount of unrecognized benefit that would impact the effective tax rate, if recognized, was approximately $9 million as of December 31, 2016. A total of approximately $3 million of interest and penalties is included in the amount of liability for uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2016. It is our policy to recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized benefits in our consolidated statements of (loss) income as income tax expense.

It is possible the amount of unrecognized tax benefit could change in the next 12 months as a result of a lapse of the statute of limitations and settlements with taxing authorities; however, we do not anticipate the change will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or consolidated financial position.

We, or one of our subsidiaries, files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. We have extended the federal statute of limitations through March 31, 2017 for Triad Hospitals, Inc. for the tax periods ended December 31, 1999, December 31, 2000, April 30, 2001, June 30, 2001, December 31, 2001, December 31, 2002, December 31, 2003, December 31, 2004, December 31, 2005, December 31, 2006 and July 25, 2007. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to state income tax examinations for years prior to 2012. Our federal income tax returns for the 2009 and 2010 tax years are currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service. We believe the results of these examinations will not be material to our consolidated results of operations or consolidated financial position. We have extended the federal statute of limitations through January 31, 2018 for Community Health Systems, Inc. for the tax periods ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010, and through December 31, 2017 for the tax periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2012.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2014-08, which changes the requirements for reporting discontinued operations. A discontinued operation continues to include a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity, or a business activity. However, in a shift reflecting stakeholder concerns that too many disposals of small groups of assets that are recurring in nature qualified for reporting as discontinued operations, a disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity will be required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. A business or nonprofit activity that, on acquisition, meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale will still be a discontinued operation. Additional disclosures will be required for significant components of the entity that are disposed of or are held for sale but do not qualify as discontinued operations. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2014 and is to be applied on a prospective basis for disposals or components initially classified as held for sale after that date. We adopted this ASU on January 1, 2015 and the adoption resulted in divestitures occurring subsequent to the date of adoption being included in continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, which outlines a single comprehensive model for recognizing revenue and supersedes most existing revenue recognition guidance, including guidance specific to the healthcare industry. This ASU provides companies the option of applying a full or modified retrospective approach upon

adoption. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We expect to adopt this ASU on January 1, 2018 and are currently developing our plan for adoption and the impact on our revenue recognition policies, procedures and control framework and the resulting impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. An implementation group for this ASU has been established with an implementation plan to transition to the new standard and determine its impact during 2017. Additionally, we plan to elect to apply the full retrospective approach upon adoption.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, which requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with the accounting for debt discounts. The ASU did not change the measurement or recognition guidance for debt issuance costs. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2015. We adopted this ASU on January 1, 2016, which resulted in the reclassification of approximately $266 million of debt issuance costs from other long-term assets to a reduction of the related long-term debt.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, which amended the balance sheet classification requirements for deferred income taxes to simplify their presentation in the statement of financial position. The ASU requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We early adopted the provisions of this ASU for the presentation and classification of its deferred tax assets at December 31, 2015. The effect of this change primarily resulted in the current portion of deferred income taxes at December 31, 2015 being included in the noncurrent deferred income tax liability.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, which amends the measurement, presentation and disclosure requirements for equity investments, other than those accounted for under the equity method or that require consolidation of the investee. The ASU eliminates the classification of equity investments as available-for-sale with any changes in fair value of such investments recognized in other comprehensive income, and requires entities to measure equity investments at fair value, with any changes in fair value recognized in net income. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We expect to adopt this ASU on January 1, 2018, and are currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, which amends the accounting for leases, requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheet with a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating leases, which will impact the expense recognition of such leases over the lease term. The ASU also modifies the lease classification criteria for lessors and eliminates some of the real estate leasing guidance previously applied for certain leasing transactions. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We expect to adopt this ASU on January 1, 2019. Because of the number of leases we utilize to support our operations, the adoption of this ASU is expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations. We are currently evaluating the extent of this anticipated impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations and the quantitative and qualitative factors that will impact us as part of the adoption of this ASU, as well as any changes to our leasing strategy because of the changes to the accounting and recognition of leases.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, which was issued to simplify some of the accounting guidance for share-based compensation. Among the areas impacted by the amendments in this ASU is the accounting for income taxes related to share-based payments, accounting for forfeitures, classification of awards as equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We will adopt this ASU on January 1, 2017. We are evaluating the impact that the adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Because of the decline in our stock price within the last year, the principal impact from adopting this ASU will be an increase in our provision for income taxes due to the deficiency in income

taxes recorded for book purposes over the vesting of the outstanding share-based awards compared to the actual tax deduction that will be recognized upon vesting.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, which simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment by eliminating step two from the goodwill impairment test. Instead of a two-step impairment model, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value as determined in step one of the impairment test, an impairment loss is measured at the amount equal to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. This ASU is effective for any interim or annual impairment tests for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. As noted in our critical accounting policy discussion on goodwill, during the fourth quarter of 2016 we performed our annual goodwill impairment analysis. While the result of the step two valuation in that analysis did not indicate an impairment of goodwill, the initial calculation of reporting unit fair value in the step one test indicated that the carrying amount of the hospital reporting unit exceeded its fair value by approximately $800 million. Depending on future changes in fair value and the impact of allocated goodwill for planned divestitures, at adoption there could be a material impairment charge recorded for this excess amount. We are evaluating whether to early adopt this ASU and what impact it will have on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of the matters discussed in this Report include forward-looking statements. Statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions or that include words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “thinks,” and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results and performance to be materially different from any future results or performance expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include the following:

•

general economic and business conditions, both nationally and in the regions in which we operate,

•

the impact of the 2016 federal elections, which may lead to the repeal of or significant changes to the Affordable Care Act, its implementation or its interpretation, as well as changes in other federal, state or local laws or regulations affecting our business,

•

the extent to which states support increases, decreases or changes in Medicaid programs, implement health insurance exchanges or alter the provision of healthcare to state residents through regulation or otherwise,

•

the future and long-term viability of health insurance exchanges, which may be affected by whether a sufficient number of payors participate as well as the impact of the 2016 federal elections on the Affordable Care Act,

•

risks associated with our substantial indebtedness, leverage and debt service obligations, including our ability to refinance such indebtedness on acceptable terms or to incur additional indebtedness,

•

demographic changes,

•

changes in, or the failure to comply with, governmental regulations,

•

potential adverse impact of known and unknown government investigations, audits, and federal and state false claims act litigation and other legal proceedings,

•

our ability, where appropriate, to enter into and maintain provider arrangements with payors and the terms of these arrangements, which may be further affected by the increasing consolidation of health insurers and managed care companies,

•

changes in, or the failure to comply with, contract terms with payors and changes in reimbursement rates paid by federal or state healthcare programs or commercial payors,

•

any potential additional impairments in the carrying value of goodwill, other intangible assets, or other long-lived assets, or changes in the useful lives of other intangible assets,

•

changes in inpatient or outpatient Medicare and Medicaid payment levels,

•

the effects related to the continued implementation of the sequestration spending reductions and the potential for future deficit reduction legislation,

•

increases in the amount and risk of collectability of patient accounts receivable, including decreases in collectability which may result from, among other things, self-pay growth in states that have not expanded Medicaid and difficulties in recovering payments for which patients are responsible, including co-pays and deductibles,

•

the efforts of insurers, healthcare providers and others to contain healthcare costs, including the trend toward value-based purchasing,

•

our ongoing ability to demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology and recognize income for the related Medicare or Medicaid incentive payments, to the extent such payments have not expired,

•

increases in wages as a result of inflation or competition for highly technical positions and rising supply and drug costs due to market pressure from pharmaceutical companies and new product releases,

•

liabilities and other claims asserted against us, including self-insured malpractice claims,

•

competition,

•

our ability to attract and retain, at reasonable employment costs, qualified personnel, key management, physicians, nurses and other healthcare workers,

•

trends toward treatment of patients in less acute or specialty healthcare settings, including ambulatory surgery centers or specialty hospitals,

•

changes in medical or other technology,

•

changes in U.S. GAAP,

•

the availability and terms of capital to fund any additional acquisitions or replacement facilities or other capital expenditures,

•

our ability to successfully make acquisitions or complete divestitures, including the disposition of hospitals and non-hospital businesses pursuant to our portfolio rationalization and deleveraging strategy, our ability to complete any such acquisitions or divestitures on desired terms or at all (including to realize the anticipated amount of proceeds from contemplated dispositions), the timing of the completion of any such acquisitions or divestitures, and our ability to realize the intended benefits from any such acquisitions or divestitures,

•

our ability to successfully integrate any acquired hospitals, including those of HMA, or to recognize expected synergies from acquisitions,

•

the impact of seasonal severe weather conditions,

•

our ability to obtain adequate levels of general and professional liability insurance,

•

timeliness of reimbursement payments received under government programs,

•

effects related to outbreaks of infectious diseases,

•

the impact of the external, criminal cyber-attack suffered by us in the second quarter of 2014, including potential reputational damage, the outcome of our investigation and any potential governmental inquiries, the outcome of litigation filed against us in connection with this cyber-attack, the extent of remediation costs and additional operating or other expenses that we may continue to incur, and the impact of potential future cyber-attacks or security breaches,

•

any failure to comply with the terms of the Corporate Integrity Agreement,

•

the concentration of our revenue in a small number of states,

•

our ability to realize anticipated cost savings and other benefits from our current strategic and operational cost savings initiatives,

•

any effects of our previously announced adoption of a Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement,

•

any effects related to our previously announced exploration of strategic alternatives, and

•

the other risk factors set forth in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 and our other public filings with the SEC.

Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, these assumptions are inherently subject to significant regulatory, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and may be beyond the control of the Company. Accordingly, the Company cannot give any assurance that its expectations will in fact occur and cautions that actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Given these uncertainties, prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this filing. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, or to make any other forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to interest rate changes, primarily as a result of our Credit Facility which bears interest based on floating rates. In order to manage the volatility relating to the market risk, we entered into interest rate swap agreements described under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Part II, Item 7. We utilize risk management procedures and controls in executing derivative financial instrument transactions. We do not execute transactions or hold derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. Derivative financial instruments related to interest rate sensitivity of debt obligations are used with the goal of mitigating a portion of the exposure when it is cost effective to do so. As of December 31, 2016, our approximately $2.6 billion notional amount of interest rate swap agreements outstanding represented approximately 36.1% of our variable rate debt.

A 1% change in interest rates on variable rate debt in excess of that amount covered by interest rate swaps would have resulted in interest expense fluctuating approximately $50 million in 2016 and $61 million in 2015 and $59 million in 2014. On a prospective basis, a 1% change in interest rates on the remaining unhedged variable rate debt existing as of December 31, 2016, would result in interest expense fluctuating approximately $46 million per year.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index to Financial Statements


	Page
Community Health Systems, Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		97
Consolidated Statements of (Loss) Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014		98
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014		99
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015		100
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014		101
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014		102
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		103

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Community Health Systems, Inc.

Franklin, Tennessee

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Community Health Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of (loss) income, comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Community Health Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 21, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Nashville, Tennessee

February 21, 2017

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF (LOSS) INCOME


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
	(In millions, except share and per share data)
Operating revenues (net of contractual allowances and discounts)	$	21,275		$	22,564		$	21,561
Provision for bad debts		2,837			3,127			2,922

Net operating revenues		18,438			19,437			18,639

Operating costs and expenses:
Salaries and benefits		8,624			8,991			8,618
Supplies		3,011			3,048			2,862
Other operating expenses		4,248			4,520			4,322
Government and other legal settlements and related costs		16			4			101
Electronic health records incentive reimbursement		(70	)		(160	)		(259	)
Rent		450			457			434
Depreciation and amortization		1,100			1,172			1,106
Amortization of software to be abandoned		-			-			75
Impairment and (gain) loss on sale of businesses, net		1,919			68			41

Total operating costs and expenses		19,298			18,100			17,300

(Loss) income from operations		(860	)		1,337			1,339
Interest expense, net of interest income of $14, $15 and $5 in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively		962			973			972
Loss from early extinguishment of debt		30			16			73
Gain on sale of investments in unconsolidated affiliates		(94	)		-			-
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates		(43	)		(63	)		(48	)

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes		(1,715	)		411			342
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes		(104	)		116			82

(Loss) income from continuing operations		(1,611	)		295			260

Discontinued operations, net of taxes:
Loss from operations of entities sold or held for sale		(7	)		(27	)		(7	)
Impairment of hospitals sold or held for sale		(8	)		(5	)		(50	)
Loss on sale, net		-			(4	)		-

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(15	)		(36	)		(57	)

Net (loss) income		(1,626	)		259			203
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		95			101			111

Net (loss) income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders	$	(1,721	)	$	158		$	92

Basic (loss) earnings per share attributable to Community
Health Systems, Inc. common stockholders (1):
Continuing operations	$	(15.41	)	$	1.69		$	1.33
Discontinued operations		(0.13	)		(0.31	)		(0.51	)

Net (loss) income	$	(15.54	)	$	1.38		$	0.82

Diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to Community
Health Systems, Inc. common stockholders (1):
Continuing operations	$	(15.41	)	$	1.68		$	1.32
Discontinued operations		(0.13	)		(0.31	)		(0.51	)

Net (loss) income	$	(15.54	)	$	1.37		$	0.82

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding:
Basic		110,730,971			114,454,674			111,579,088

Diluted		110,730,971			115,272,404			112,549,320

(1)	Total per share amounts may not add due to rounding.

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014

	(In millions)
Net (loss) income	$	(1,626	)	$	259		$	203
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes:
Net change in fair value of interest rate swaps, net of tax benefit of $10, $(3) and $7 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively		17			(6	)		13
Net change in fair value of available-for-sale securities, net of tax		(11	)		(5	)		-
Amortization and recognition of unrecognized pension cost components, net of tax (benefit) of $2, $1 and $(9) for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively		3			1			(9	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)		9			(10	)		4

Comprehensive (loss) income		(1,617	)		249			207
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		95			101			111

Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders	$	(1,712	)	$	148		$	96

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


	December 31,
	2016			2015
	(In millions, except share data)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	238		$	184
Patient accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,773 and $4,110 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively		3,176			3,611
Supplies		480			580
Prepaid income taxes		17			27
Prepaid expenses and taxes		187			197
Other current assets (including assets of hospitals held for sale of $117 and $17 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively)		568			567

Total current assets		4,666			5,166

Property and equipment
Land and improvements		782			969
Buildings and improvements		7,438			9,051
Equipment and fixtures		4,202			4,886

Property and equipment, gross		12,422			14,906
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(4,273	)		(4,794	)

Property and equipment, net		8,149			10,112

Goodwill		6,521			8,965

Other assets, net of accumulated amortization of $929 and $903 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively (including assets of hospitals held for sale of $878 and $41 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively)		2,608			2,352

Total assets	$	21,944		$	26,595

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	455		$	229
Accounts payable		995			1,258
Accrued liabilities:
Employee compensation		731			823
Interest		207			227
Other (including liabilities of hospitals held for sale of $81 and $6 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively)		499			535

Total current liabilities		2,887			3,072

Long-term debt		14,789			16,556

Deferred income taxes		411			593

Other long-term liabilities		1,575			1,698

Total liabilities		19,662			21,919

Redeemable noncontrolling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries		554			571

Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)
EQUITY
Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized; none issued		-			-
Common stock, $.01 par value per share, 300,000,000 shares authorized; 113,876,580 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016, and 113,732,933 shares issued and 112,757,384 shares outstanding at December 31, 2015		1			1
Additional paid-in capital		1,975			1,963
Treasury stock, at cost, no shares at December 31, 2016 and 975,549 shares at December 31, 2015		-			(7	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(62	)		(73	)
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings		(299	)		2,135

Total Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders’ equity		1,615			4,019
Noncontrolling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries		113			86

Total equity		1,728			4,105

Total liabilities and equity	$	21,944		$	26,595

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

100

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY


				Community Health Systems, Inc. Stockholders
	Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests			Common Stock					Additional Paid-in Capital			Treasury Stock						Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests			Shares			Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital			Shares			Amount			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Stockholders’ Equity
												(In millions, except share data)
Balance, December 31, 2013		358			95,987,032			1		1,256			(975,549	)		(7	)		(67	)		1,885			64			3,132
Comprehensive income		86			-			-		-			-			-			4			92			25			121
Distributions to noncontrolling interests, net of contributions		(78	)		-			-		-			-			-			-			-			(26	)		(26	)
Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests		(156	)		-			-		(2	)		-			-			-			-			-			(2	)
Other reclassifications of noncontrolling interests		11			-			-		-			-			-			-			-			(11	)		(11	)
Noncontrolling interests in acquired entity		316			-			-		-			-			-			-			-			28			28
Adjustment to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interests		(6	)		-			-		6			-			-			-			-			-			6
Repurchases of common stock		-			(175,000	)		-		(9	)		-			-			-			-			-			(9	)
Issuance of common stock in connection with the exercise of stock options		-			1,767,806			-		65			-			-			-			-			-			65
Issuance of shares in exchange for HMA common stock		-			18,364,420			-		736			-			-			-			-			-			736
Cancellation of restricted stock for tax withholdings on vested shares		-			(270,997	)		-		(11	)		-			-			-			-			-			(11	)
Stock-based compensation		-			2,027,826			-		54			-			-			-			-			-			54

Balance, December 31, 2014		531			117,701,087			1		2,095			(975,549	)		(7	)		(63	)		1,977			80			4,083
Comprehensive income		74			-			-		-			-			-			(10	)		158			27			175
Contributions from noncontrolling interests		47			-			-		-			-			-			-			-			-			-
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		(70	)		-			-		-			-			-			-			-			(30	)		(30	)
Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests		(25	)		-			-		(16	)		-			-			-			-			5			(11	)
Disposition of less-than-wholly owned hospital		(8	)		-			-		-			-			-			-			-			(2	)		(2	)
Other reclassifications of noncontrolling interests		(1	)		-			-		-			-			-			-			-			1			1
Noncontrolling interests in acquired entity		2			-			-		-			-			-			-			-			5			5
Adjustment to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interests		21			-			-		(21	)		-			-			-			-			-			(21	)
Repurchases of common stock		-			(5,532,188	)		-		(159	)		-			-			-			-			-			(159	)
Issuance of common stock in connection with the exercise of stock options		-			712,235			-		25			-			-			-			-			-			25
Issuance of shares in exchange for HMA common stock		-			(56	)		-		-			-			-			-			-			-			-
Cancellation of restricted stock for tax withholdings on vested shares		-			(417,019	)		-		(20	)		-			-			-			-			-			(20	)
Stock-based compensation		-			1,268,874			-		59			-			-			-			-			-			59

Balance, December 31, 2015		571			113,732,933			1		1,963			(975,549	)		(7	)		(73	)		2,135			86			4,105
Comprehensive income		71			-			-		-			-			-			9			(1,721	)		24			(1,688	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests, net of contributions		(69	)		-			-		-			-			-			-			-			(23	)		(23	)
Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests		(14	)		-			-		(9	)		-			-			-			-			4			(5	)
Disposition of less-than-wholly owned hospital		(3	)		-			-		-			-			-			-			-			-			-
Noncontrolling interests in acquired entity		-			-			-		-			-			-			-			-			33			33
Adjustment to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interests		6			-			-		(6	)		-			-			-			-			-			(6	)
Distribution of Quorum Health Corporation		(8	)		-			-		-			-			-			2			(713	)		(11	)		(722	)
Cancellation of treasury stock		-			(975,549	)		-		(7	)		975,549			7			-			-			-			-
Cancellation of restricted stock for tax withholdings on vested shares		-			(368,945	)		-		(6	)		-			-			-			-			-			(6	)
Income tax payable increase from vesting of restricted shares		-			-			-		(6	)		-			-			-			-			-			(6	)
Stock-based compensation		-			1,488,141			-		46			-			-			-			-			-			46

Balance, December 31, 2016	$	554			113,876,580		$	1	$	1,975			-		$	-		$	(62	)	$	(299	)	$	113		$	1,728

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

101

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
	(In millions)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(1,626	)	$	259		$	203
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,100			1,174			1,187
Deferred income taxes		(116	)		103			107
Government and other legal settlements and related costs		16			4			101
Stock-based compensation expense		46			59			54
Loss on sale, net		-			4			-
Impairment of hospitals sold or held for sale		8			5			50
Impairment and (gain) loss on sale of businesses, net		1,919			68			41
Loss from early extinguishment of debt		30			16			73
Gain on sale of investments in unconsolidated affiliates		(94	)		-			-
Other non-cash expenses, net		31			47			13
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures:
Patient accounts receivable		(96	)		(219	)		(306	)
Supplies, prepaid expenses and other current assets		25			(68	)		28
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and income taxes		(137	)		(478	)		147
Other		31			(53	)		(83	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		1,137			921			1,615

Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisitions of facilities and other related equipment		(123	)		(57	)		(3,091	)
Purchases of property and equipment		(744	)		(953	)		(853	)
Proceeds from disposition of hospitals and other ancillary operations		143			155			88
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		15			15			50
Purchases of available-for-sale securities		(505	)		(162	)		(263	)
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities		464			156			229
Proceeds from sale of investments in unconsolidated affiliates		403			-			-
Distribution from Quorum Health Corporation		1,219			-			-
Increase in other investments		(242	)		(205	)		(511	)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		630			(1,051	)		(4,351	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		-			25			65
Repurchase of restricted stock shares for payroll tax withholding requirements		(6	)		(20	)		(11	)
Stock buy-back		-			(159	)		(9	)
Deferred financing costs and other debt-related costs		(26	)		(30	)		(276	)
Proceeds from noncontrolling investors in joint ventures		-			47			10
Redemption of noncontrolling investments in joint ventures		(19	)		(36	)		(158	)
Distributions to noncontrolling investors in joint ventures		(92	)		(100	)		(104	)
Proceeds from sale-lease back		159			-			-
Borrowings under credit agreements		4,879			4,922			9,131
Issuance of long-term debt		-			-			4,000
Proceeds from receivables facility		107			206			204
Repayments of long-term indebtedness		(6,715	)		(5,050	)		(9,980	)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(1,713	)		(195	)		2,872

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		54			(325	)		136
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		184			509			373

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	238		$	184		$	509

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest payments	$	(930	)	$	(925	)	$	(831	)

Income tax refunds (payments), net	$	16		$	(12	)	$	180

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

102

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Business. Community Health Systems, Inc. is a holding company and operates no business in its own name. On a consolidated basis, Community Health Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) own, lease and operate general acute care hospitals in communities across the country. As of December 31, 2016, the Company owned or leased 155 hospitals, included in continuing operations, including three stand-alone rehabilitation or psychiatric hospitals, licensed for 26,222 beds in 21 states. Throughout these notes to the consolidated financial statements, Community Health Systems, Inc. (the “Parent”) and its consolidated subsidiaries are referred to on a collective basis as the “Company.” This drafting style is not meant to indicate that the publicly-traded Parent or any particular subsidiary of the Parent owns or operates any asset, business, or property. The hospitals, operations and businesses described in this filing are owned and operated, and management services provided, by distinct and indirect subsidiaries of Community Health Systems, Inc. The results of Health Management Associates, Inc. (“HMA”) are included from January 27, 2014, the date of the HMA merger.

As of December 31, 2016, Florida, Texas, Pennsylvania and Indiana represent the only areas of significant geographic concentration. Operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before the provision for bad debts), generated by the Company’s hospitals in Florida, as a percentage of consolidated operating revenues, were 14.1% in 2016, 13.6% in 2015 and 13.0% in 2014. Operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before the provision for bad debts), generated by the Company’s hospitals in Texas, as a percentage of consolidated operating revenues, were 11.4% in 2016, 11.1% in 2015 and 10.9% in 2014. Operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before the provision for bad debts), generated by the Company’s hospitals in Pennsylvania, as a percentage of consolidated operating revenues, were 11.2% in 2016, 10.6% in 2015 and 11.1% in 2014. Operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before the provision for bad debts), generated by the Company’s hospitals in Indiana, as a percentage of consolidated operating revenues, were 8.6% in 2016, 7.3% in 2015 and 7.6% in 2014.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Parent, its subsidiaries, all of which are controlled by the Parent through majority voting control, and variable interest entities for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. All intercompany accounts, profits and transactions have been eliminated. Noncontrolling interests in less-than-wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries of the Parent are presented as a component of total equity to distinguish between the interests of the Parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. Revenues, expenses and income from continuing operations from these subsidiaries are included in the consolidated amounts as presented on the consolidated statements of (loss) income, along with a net income measure that separately presents the amounts attributable to the controlling interests and the amounts attributable to the noncontrolling interests for each of the periods presented. Noncontrolling interests that are redeemable or may become redeemable at a fixed or determinable price at the option of the holder or upon the occurrence of an event outside of the control of the Company are presented in mezzanine equity on the consolidated balance sheets.

Cost of Revenue. Substantially all of the Company’s operating costs and expenses are “cost of revenue” items. Operating costs that could be classified as general and administrative by the Company would include the

103

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Company’s corporate office costs at its Franklin, Tennessee office and Naples, Florida office (which was the headquarters of HMA prior to the closing of the HMA merger), which collectively were $197 million, $266 million and $281 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Included in these corporate office costs is stock-based compensation of $46 million, $59 million and $54 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Cash Equivalents. The Company considers highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Supplies. Supplies, principally medical supplies, are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out basis) or market.

Marketable Securities. The Company’s marketable securities are classified as trading or available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value as determined by quoted market prices, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Trading securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax, included an unrealized loss of $11 million and $5 million during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and an unrealized gain of less than $1 million during the year ended December 31, 2014, related to these available-for-sale securities.

Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is recognized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the land and improvements (3 to 20 years), buildings and improvements (5 to 40 years) and equipment and fixtures (3 to 18 years). Costs capitalized as construction in progress were $227 million and $267 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Expenditures for renovations and other significant improvements are capitalized; however, maintenance and repairs which do not improve or extend the useful lives of the respective assets are charged to operations as incurred. Interest capitalized related to construction in progress was $9 million, $16 million and $10 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Purchases of property and equipment and internal-use software accrued in accounts payable and not yet paid were $115 million and $173 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The Company also leases certain facilities and equipment under capital leases (see Note 10). Such assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the term of the lease or the remaining useful lives of the applicable assets. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company had non-cash investing activity of $17 million related to certain facility and equipment additions that were financed through capital leases and other debt.

Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the fair value of the consideration conveyed in the acquisition over the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill arising from business combinations is not amortized. Goodwill is required to be evaluated for impairment at the same time every year and when an event occurs or circumstances change such that it is more likely than not that impairment may exist. The Company performs its annual testing of impairment for goodwill in the fourth quarter of each year. As further discussed in Note 5, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $1.395 billion during the year ended December 31, 2016, based on an interim impairment evaluation performed during the second quarter of 2016.

Other Assets. Other assets consist of the insurance recovery receivable from excess insurance carriers related to the Company’s self-insured malpractice general liability and workers’ compensation insurance liability; costs to recruit physicians to the Company’s markets, which are deferred and expensed over the term of the respective physician recruitment contract, generally three years, and included in amortization expense; and capitalized internal-use software costs, which are expensed over the expected useful life, which is generally three years for routine software and eight to ten years for major software projects, and included in amortization expense.

104

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Third-Party Reimbursement. Net patient service revenue is reported at the estimated net realizable amount from patients, third-party payors and others for services rendered. Operating revenues include amounts estimated by management to be reimbursable by Medicare and Medicaid under prospective payment systems, provisions of cost-reimbursement and other payment methods. Approximately 34.4%, 35.3% and 35.5% of operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before the provision for bad debts), for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, are related to services rendered to patients covered by the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Revenues from Medicare outlier payments are included in the amounts received from Medicare and were approximately 0.38%, 0.28% and 0.41% of operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before the provision for bad debts), for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In addition, the Company is reimbursed by non-governmental payors using a variety of payment methodologies. Amounts received by the Company for treatment of patients covered by such programs are generally less than the standard billing rates. The differences between the estimated program reimbursement rates and the standard billing rates are accounted for as contractual adjustments, which are deducted from gross revenues to arrive at operating revenues (net of contractual allowances and discounts). These net operating revenues are an estimate of the net realizable amount due from these payors. The process of estimating contractual allowances requires the Company to estimate the amount expected to be received based on payor contract provisions. The key assumption in this process is the estimated contractual reimbursement percentage, which is based on payor classification and historical paid claims data. Due to the complexities involved in these estimates, actual payments the Company receives could be different from the amounts it estimates and records. Final settlements under some of these programs are subject to adjustment based on administrative review and audit by third parties. Adjustments to previous program reimbursement estimates are accounted for as contractual allowance adjustments and reported in the periods that such adjustments become known.

Amounts due to third-party payors were $99 million and $112 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and are included in accrued liabilities-other in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Amounts due from third-party payors were $186 million and $213 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and are included in other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Substantially all Medicare and Medicaid cost reports are final settled through 2012.

Net Operating Revenues. Net operating revenues are recorded net of provisions for contractual allowance of approximately $98.2 billion, $95.3 billion and $84.4 billion for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Net operating revenues are recognized when services are provided and are reported at the estimated net realizable amount from patients, third-party payors and others for services rendered. Also included in the provision for contractual allowance shown above is the value of administrative and other discounts provided to self-pay patients eliminated from net operating revenues which was $3.2 billion, $3.0 billion and $2.8 billion for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company renders services to patients who are financially unable to pay for hospital care. The Company’s policy is to not pursue collections for such amounts; therefore, the related charges for those patients who are financially unable to pay and that otherwise do not qualify for reimbursement from a governmental program are not reported in net operating revenues or in the provision for bad debts, and are thus classified as charity care. The Company determines amounts that qualify for charity care primarily based on the patient’s household income relative to the federal poverty level guidelines, as established by the federal government.

Included in the provision for contractual allowance shown above is $487 million, $453 million and $550 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, representing the value (at the Company’s standard charges) of these charity care services that are excluded from net operating revenues.

105

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The estimated cost incurred by the Company to provide these charity care services to patients who are unable to pay was approximately $64 million, $64 million and $84 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The estimated cost of these charity care services was determined using a ratio of cost to gross charges and applying that ratio to the gross charges associated with providing care to charity patients for the period.

Currently, several states utilize supplemental reimbursement programs for the purpose of providing reimbursement to providers to offset a portion of the cost of providing care to Medicaid patients. These programs are designed with input from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and are funded with a combination of state and federal resources, including, in certain instances, fees or taxes levied on the providers. Similar programs are also being considered by other states. After these supplemental programs are signed into law, the Company recognizes revenue and related expenses in the period in which amounts are estimable and collection is reasonably assured. Reimbursement under these programs is reflected in net operating revenues and fees, taxes or other program-related costs are reflected in other operating expenses.

Operating revenues, net of contractual allowances and discounts (but before the provision for bad debts), recognized during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, were as follows (in millions):


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2015		2014
Medicare	$	5,089	$	5,439	$	5,327
Medicaid		2,234		2,532		2,332
Managed Care and other third-party payors		11,354		11,816		11,109
Self-pay		2,598		2,777		2,793

Total	$	21,275	$	22,564	$	21,561

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. Accounts receivable are reduced by an allowance for amounts that could become uncollectible in the future. Substantially all of the Company’s receivables are related to providing healthcare services to patients at its hospitals and affiliated businesses.

The Company estimates the allowance for doubtful accounts by reserving a percentage of all self-pay accounts receivable without regard to aging category, based on collection history, adjusted for expected recoveries and any anticipated changes in trends. The Company’s ability to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts is not impacted by not utilizing an aging of net accounts receivable as the Company believes that substantially all of the risk exists at the point in time such accounts are identified as self-pay. For all other non-self-pay payor categories, the Company reserves an estimated amount on historical collection rates for the uncontractualized portion of all accounts aging over 365 days from the date of discharge. These amounts represent an immaterial percentage of the outstanding accounts receivable. The percentage used to reserve for all self-pay accounts is based on the Company’s collection history. The Company collects substantially all of its third-party insured receivables, which include receivables from governmental agencies.

Collections are impacted by the economic ability of patients to pay and the effectiveness of the Company’s collection efforts. Significant changes in payor mix, business office operations, economic conditions or trends in federal and state governmental healthcare coverage could affect the Company’s collection of accounts receivable and the estimates of the collectability of future accounts receivable and are considered in the Company’s estimates of accounts receivable collectability. The Company also continually reviews its overall reserve adequacy by monitoring historical cash collections as a percentage of trailing net revenue less provision for bad debts, as well as by analyzing current period net revenue and admissions by payor classification, aged accounts

106

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

receivable by payor, days revenue outstanding, the composition of self-pay receivables between pure self-pay patients and the patient responsibility portion of third-party insured receivables and the impact of recent acquisitions and dispositions.

During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company recorded $169 million of additional provision for bad debts and a corresponding increase to the allowance for doubtful accounts. The additional amount was the result of new information obtained since the end of the third quarter of 2015 related to the deterioration in the overall collectability of self-pay accounts receivable. As a result, the Company refined its estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts and the additional amount was recorded as a change in estimate for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Electronic Health Records Incentive Reimbursement. The federal government has implemented a number of regulations and programs designed to promote the use of electronic health records (“EHR”) technology and, pursuant to the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”), established requirements for a Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments program for eligible hospitals and professionals that adopt and meaningfully use certified EHR technology. The Company utilizes a gain contingency model to recognize EHR incentive payments. Recognition occurs when the eligible hospitals adopt or demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology for the applicable payment period and have available the Medicare cost report information for the relevant full cost report year used to determine the final incentive payment.

Medicaid EHR incentive payments are calculated based on prior period Medicare cost report information available at the time when eligible hospitals adopt, implement, upgrade or demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology. Since the information for the relevant full Medicare cost report year is available at the time of attestation, the incentive income from resolving the gain contingency is recognized when eligible hospitals adopt, implement, upgrade or demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology.

Medicare EHR incentive payments are calculated based on the Medicare cost report information for the full cost report year that began during the federal fiscal year in which meaningful use is demonstrated. Since the necessary information is only available at the end of the relevant full Medicare cost report year and after the cost report is settled, the incentive income from resolving the gain contingency is recognized when eligible hospitals demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology and the information for the applicable full Medicare cost report year to determine the final incentive payment is available.

In some instances, the Company may receive estimated Medicare EHR incentive payments prior to when the Medicare cost report information used to determine the final incentive payment is available. In these instances, recognition of the gain for EHR incentive payments is deferred until all recognition criteria described above are met.

Eligibility for annual Medicare incentive payments is dependent on providers successfully attesting to the meaningful use of EHR technology. Medicaid incentive payments are available to providers in the first payment year that they adopt, implement or upgrade certified EHR technology; however, providers must demonstrate meaningful use of such technology in any subsequent payment years to qualify for additional incentive payments. Medicaid EHR incentive payments are fully funded by the federal government and administered by the states; however, the states are not required to offer EHR incentive payments to providers.

The Company recognized approximately $70 million, $160 million and $259 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, of incentive reimbursement for HITECH incentives from Medicare and Medicaid related to certain of the Company’s hospitals and for certain of the Company’s employed physicians that have demonstrated meaningful use of certified EHR technology or have completed attestations to their adoption or implementation of certified EHR technology. These incentive reimbursements are presented as a reduction of operating costs and expenses on the consolidated statements of (loss) income. The Company

107

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

received cash related to the incentive reimbursement for HITECH incentives of approximately $123 million, $75 million and $253 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Company recorded no deferred revenue in connection with the receipt of these cash payments at either December 31, 2016 or 2015.

Physician Income Guarantees. The Company enters into physician recruiting agreements under which it supplements physician income to a minimum amount over a period of time, typically one year, while the physicians establish themselves in the community. As part of the agreements, the physicians are committed to practice in the community for a period of time, typically three years, which extends beyond their income guarantee period. The Company records an asset and liability for the estimated fair value of minimum revenue guarantees on new agreements. Adjustments to the ultimate value of the guarantee paid to physicians are recognized in the period that the change in estimate is identified. The Company amortizes an asset over the life of the agreement. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the unamortized portion of these physician income guarantees was $37 million and $47 million, respectively.

Concentrations of Credit Risk. The Company grants unsecured credit to its patients, most of whom reside in the service area of the Company’s facilities and are insured under third-party payor agreements. Because of the economic diversity of the Company’s facilities and non-governmental third-party payors, Medicare represents the only significant concentration of credit risk from payors. Accounts receivable, net of contractual allowances, from Medicare was $402 million and $453 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, representing 6% of consolidated net accounts receivable, before allowance for doubtful accounts, for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a total impairment charge of $326 million to reduce the carrying value of certain hospitals that have been deemed held for sale based on the difference between the carrying value of the hospital disposal groups compared to estimated fair value less costs to sell. Additionally, the Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $270 million for several underperforming hospitals to their estimated fair value. The impairment charge for the year ended December 31, 2016 also included approximately $19 million recorded on the sale or closure of certain of the Company’s hospitals during the year based on the remaining net book value of the assets at the date of disposal. In total, the Company recorded impairment charges of approximately $615 million on its long-lived assets other than the impairment charge taken on the hospital reporting unit goodwill that is further discussed in Note 5. Included in the carrying value of the hospital disposal groups is an allocation of approximately $365 million of goodwill allocated from the hospital reporting unit goodwill based on a calculation of the disposal groups’ relative fair value compared to the total reporting unit.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded a pretax impairment charge of approximately $68 million related to the write-off of approximately $6 million of allocated reporting unit goodwill for Payson Regional Medical Center and $62 million for the impairment of certain long-lived assets for several smaller hospitals to their estimated fair value. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded a pretax impairment charge of $17 million to reduce the carrying value of certain long-lived assets at three of its smaller hospitals to their estimated fair value. The impairments for 2016, 2015 and 2014 were identified because of declining operating results and projections of future cash flows at these hospitals caused by competitive and operational challenges specific to the markets in which these hospitals operate.

Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, in which deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the tax consequences of “temporary differences” by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in the consolidated statement of (loss) income during the period in which the tax rate change becomes law.

108

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Comprehensive (Loss) Income. Comprehensive (loss) income is the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources.

Segment Reporting. A public company is required to report annual and interim financial and descriptive information about its reportable operating segments. Operating segments, as defined, are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Aggregation of similar operating segments into a single reportable operating segment is permitted if the businesses have similar economic characteristics and meet the criteria established by U.S. GAAP.

The Company operated in two distinct operating segments during 2016, represented by the hospital operations (which includes the Company’s acute care hospitals and related healthcare entities that provide inpatient and outpatient healthcare services) and the home care agencies operations (which provide in-home outpatient care). U.S. GAAP requires (1) that financial information be disclosed for operating segments that meet a 10% quantitative threshold of the consolidated totals of net revenue, profit or loss, or total assets; and (2) that the individual reportable segments disclosed contribute at least 75% of total consolidated net revenue. Based on these measures, only the hospital operations segment meets the criteria as a separate reportable segment. Financial information for the home care agencies segment does not meet the quantitative thresholds and is therefore combined with corporate into the all other reportable segment. Additionally, as discussed in Note 3, on December 31, 2016, the Company sold 80% of its ownership interest in the home care segment.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The Company records derivative instruments on the consolidated balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. Changes in a derivative’s fair value are recorded each period in earnings or other comprehensive income (“OCI”), depending on whether the derivative is designated and is effective as a hedged transaction, and on the type of hedge transaction. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments recorded to OCI are reclassified to earnings in the period affected by the underlying hedged item. Any portion of the fair value of a derivative instrument determined to be ineffective under the standard is recognized in current earnings.

The Company has entered into several interest rate swap agreements. See Note 8 for further discussion about the swap transactions.

New Accounting Pronouncements. In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, which outlines a single comprehensive model for recognizing revenue and supersedes most existing revenue recognition guidance, including guidance specific to the healthcare industry. This ASU provides companies the option of applying a full or modified retrospective approach upon adoption. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company expects to adopt this ASU on January 1, 2018 and is currently developing its plan for adoption and the impact on its revenue recognition policies, procedures and control framework and the resulting impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. An implementation group for this ASU has been established with an implementation plan to transition to the new standard and determine its impact during 2017. Additionally, the Company plans to elect to apply the full retrospective approach upon adoption.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, which requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with the accounting for debt discounts. The ASU did not change the measurement or recognition guidance for debt issuance costs. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2015. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2016, which resulted in the reclassification of approximately

109

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

$266 million of debt issuance costs from other long-term assets to a reduction of the related long-term debt. The adoption of this ASU was applied retroactively to all periods presented, and had no impact on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, which amended the balance sheet classification requirements for deferred income taxes to simplify their presentation in the statement of financial position. The ASU requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company early adopted the provisions of this ASU for the presentation and classification of its deferred tax assets at December 31, 2015. The effect of this change primarily resulted in the current portion of deferred income taxes at December 31, 2015 being included in the noncurrent deferred income tax liability.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, which amends the measurement, presentation and disclosure requirements for equity investments, other than those accounted for under the equity method or that require consolidation of the investee. The ASU eliminates the classification of equity investments as available-for-sale with any changes in fair value of such investments recognized in other comprehensive income, and requires entities to measure equity investments at fair value, with any changes in fair value recognized in net income. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company expects to adopt this ASU on January 1, 2018, and is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, which amends the accounting for leases, requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheet with a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating leases, which will impact the expense recognition of such leases over the lease term. The ASU also modifies the lease classification criteria for lessors and eliminates some of the real estate leasing guidance previously applied for certain leasing transactions. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company expects to adopt this ASU on January 1, 2019. Because of the number of leases the Company utilizes to support its operations, the adoption of this ASU is expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations. Management is currently evaluating the extent of this anticipated impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations, and the quantitative and qualitative factors that will impact the Company as part of the adoption of this ASU, as well as any changes to its leasing strategy that may occur because of the changes to the accounting and recognition of leases.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, which was issued to simplify some of the accounting guidance for share-based compensation. Among the areas impacted by the amendments in this ASU is the accounting for income taxes related to share-based payments, accounting for forfeitures, classification of awards as equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company expects to adopt this ASU on January 1, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Because of the decline in the Company’s stock price within the last year, the principal impact from adopting this ASU will be an increase in the Company’s provision for income taxes due to the deficiency in income taxes recorded for book purposes over the vesting of the outstanding share-based awards compared to the actual tax deduction that will be recognized upon vesting.

110

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

reporting unit. This ASU is effective for any interim or annual impairment tests for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. As noted in the Company’s critical accounting policy discussion on goodwill, during the fourth quarter of 2016 the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment analysis. While the result of the step two valuation in that analysis did not indicate an impairment of goodwill, the initial calculation of reporting unit fair value in the step one test indicated that the carrying amount of the hospital reporting unit exceeded its fair value by approximately $800 million. Depending on future changes in fair value and the impact of allocated goodwill for planned divestitures, at adoption there could be a material impairment charge recorded for this excess amount. The Company is evaluating whether to early adopt this ASU and what impact it will have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

2. ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock-based compensation awards have been granted under the Community Health Systems, Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option and Award Plan, amended and restated as of March 20, 2013 (the “2000 Plan”), and the Community Health Systems, Inc. Amended and Restated 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan, which was amended and restated as of March 16, 2016 and approved by the Company’s stockholders at the annual meeting of stockholders held on May 17, 2016 (the “2009 Plan”).

The 2000 Plan allowed for the grant of incentive stock options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “IRC”), as well as stock options which do not so qualify, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance-based shares or units and other share awards. Prior to being amended in 2009, the 2000 Plan also allowed for the grant of phantom stock. Persons eligible to receive grants under the 2000 Plan include the Company’s directors, officers, employees and consultants. All options granted under the 2000 Plan have been “nonqualified” stock options for tax purposes. Generally, vesting of these granted options occurs in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the award date. Options granted prior to 2005 have a 10-year contractual term, options granted in 2005 through 2007 have an eight-year contractual term and options granted in 2008 through 2011 have a 10-year contractual term. The Company has not granted stock option awards under the 2000 Plan since 2011. Pursuant to the amendment and restatement of the 2000 Plan dated March 20, 2013, no further grants will be awarded under the 2000 Plan.

The 2009 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the IRC and for the grant of stock options which do not so qualify, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance-based shares or units and other share awards. Persons eligible to receive grants under the 2009 Plan include the Company’s directors, officers, employees and consultants. To date, all options granted under the 2009 Plan have been “nonqualified” stock options for tax purposes. Generally, vesting of these granted options occurs in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the award date. Options granted in 2011 or later have a 10-year contractual term. The amendment and restatement of the 2009 Plan, as approved by the Company’s stockholders at the 2016 Annual Meeting, increased the number of shares of common stock available for grant under the 2009 Plan by an additional 5,000,000 shares. As of December 31, 2016, 5,960,188 shares of unissued common stock were reserved for future grants under the 2009 Plan.

The exercise price of all options granted under the 2000 Plan and the 2009 Plan has been equal to the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the option grant date.

111

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The following table reflects the impact of total compensation expense related to stock-based equity plans on the reported operating results for the respective periods (in millions):


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2015		2014
Effect on (loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes	$	(46)	$	(59)	$	(54)

Effect on net (loss) income	$	(27)	$	(35)	$	(34)

At December 31, 2016, $32 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to outstanding unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units (the terms of which are summarized below) was expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 19 months. There is no expense to be recognized related to stock options. There were no modifications to awards during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, other than those required by the Employee Matters Agreement (“EMA”) entered into as part of the spinoff of Quorum Health Corporation (“QHC”), as further discussed below.

Options outstanding and exercisable under the 2000 Plan and the 2009 Plan as of December 31, 2016, and changes during each of the years in the three-year period prior to December 31, 2016, were as follows (in millions, except share and per share data):


	Shares			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value as of December 31, 2016
Outstanding at December 31, 2013		3,737,545		$	34.88
Granted		-			-
Exercised		(1,768,473	)		37.06
Forfeited and cancelled		(15,345	)		29.92

Outstanding at December 31, 2014		1,953,727			32.94
Granted		-			-
Exercised		(711,568	)		35.15
Forfeited and cancelled		(10,001	)		34.96

Outstanding at December 31, 2015		1,232,158			31.65
Granted		-			-
Exercised		-			-
Forfeited and cancelled		(46,838	)		27.44

Outstanding at December 31, 2016		1,185,320		$	28.12		3.0 years	$	-

Exercisable at December 31, 2016		1,185,320		$	28.12		3.0 years	$	-

The weighted-average exercise prices in the table above for periods prior to the April 29, 2016 spin-off of QHC reflect the historical prices at those dates. No stock options were granted during the years ended

112

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. The aggregate intrinsic value (calculated as the number of in-the-money stock options multiplied by the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the reporting period ($5.59) and the exercise price of the respective stock options) in the table above represents the amount that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31, 2016. This amount changes based on the market value of the Company’s common stock. There were no options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2016. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $9 million and $22 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options vested and expected to vest approximates that of the outstanding options.

In accordance with the terms of the EMA, on April 29, 2016, the exercise prices of all stock options outstanding as of that date were modified to reflect the reduction in the Company’s stock price that occurred as a result of the distribution of QHC to the Company’s stockholders in order to maintain a consistent intrinsic value before and following the QHC distribution. There were no other modifications to the term or number of the outstanding options. The Company evaluated the fair value of the stock options immediately before and after the exercise price modification, and concluded that no incremental stock compensation expense should be recorded.

The Company has also awarded restricted stock under the 2000 Plan and the 2009 Plan to its directors and employees of certain subsidiaries. The restrictions on these shares generally lapse in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the award date. Certain of the restricted stock awards granted to the Company’s senior executives contain a performance objective that must be met in addition to any time-based vesting requirements. If the performance objective is not attained, the awards will be forfeited in their entirety. Once the performance objective has been attained, restrictions will lapse in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the award date. In addition, 835,000 restricted stock awards granted March 1, 2014 had a performance objective that was measured based on the realization of synergies related to the acquisition of Health Management Associates, Inc. (“HMA”) over a two-year period that began on February 1, 2014. The performance objective could be met in part in the first year or in whole or in part over such two-year period. Depending on the degree of attainment of the performance objective, restrictions would lapse on a portion of the award grant over the first three anniversaries of the award date at a level dependent upon the amount of synergies realized. If the synergies related to the HMA merger had not reached a certain level, then the awards would have been forfeited in their entirety. Based on the synergy levels attained in the first annual measurement period ended on January 31, 2015, the performance objective for the first measurement period was met, and one-third of the awards vested on March 1, 2015. Based on the synergy levels attained in the second annual measurement period ended on January 31, 2016, the performance objective for the second measurement period was also met, so the full amount of each award has been earned and one-third of the awards vested on March 1, 2016. The remaining one-third of each award will vest on March 1, 2017. Notwithstanding the above-mentioned performance objectives and vesting requirements, the restrictions with respect to restricted stock granted under the 2000 Plan and the 2009 Plan will lapse earlier in the event of death, disability or termination of employment by the Company for any reason other than for cause of the holder of the restricted stock, or change in control of the Company. Restricted stock awards subject to performance standards that have not yet been satisfied are not considered outstanding for purposes of determining earnings per share until the performance objectives have been satisfied.

On April 29, 2016, the Company cancelled 106,005 restricted stock awards from the March 1, 2016 grant that were held by former employees whose employment with the Company terminated as the result of commencing employment with QHC in connection with the spin-off. This cancellation did not include the issuance of replacement awards by the Company. As a result, the Company recorded approximately $2 million of compensation expense related to the unrecognized stock compensation expense for those awards at the cancellation date. This expense is recorded as part of the costs related to the spin-off of QHC presented in other operating expenses on the accompanying consolidated statement of (loss) income for the year ended December 31, 2016.

113

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Restricted stock outstanding under the 2000 Plan and the 2009 Plan as of December 31, 2016, and changes during each of the years in the three-year period prior to December 31, 2016, were as follows:


	Shares			Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at December 31, 2013		1,607,489		$	35.13
Granted		2,011,000			41.35
Vested		(846,818	)		34.60
Forfeited		(11,032	)		37.37

Unvested at December 31, 2014		2,760,639			39.82
Granted		1,254,500			47.69
Vested		(1,156,226	)		37.61
Forfeited		(13,334	)		41.32

Unvested at December 31, 2015		2,845,579			44.18
Granted		1,611,049			14.11
Vested		(1,343,003	)		43.39
Forfeited		(144,340	)		19.99

Unvested at December 31, 2016		2,969,285			29.39

Restricted stock units (“RSUs”) have been granted to the Company’s outside directors under the 2000 Plan and the 2009 Plan. On March 1, 2014, each of the Company’s outside directors received a grant under the 2009 Plan of 3,614 RSUs. On March 1, 2015, each of the Company’s outside directors received a grant under the 2009 Plan of 3,504 RSUs. On March 1, 2016, each of the Company’s outside directors received a grant under the 2009 Plan of 11,017 RSUs. Both the 2015 and 2016 grants had a grant date fair value of approximately $170,000. The 2014 grants had a grant date fair value of approximately $150,000. Vesting of these RSUs occurs in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the award date.

In connection with the spin-off of QHC, holders of outstanding RSUs were credited with a total of 22,021 incremental RSUs at a ratio calculated to maintain a consistent intrinsic value before and following the QHC distribution. There were no other changes to the awards and the incremental RSUs will vest in accordance with the initial vesting period of the corresponding original award.

114

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

RSUs outstanding under the 2000 Plan and the 2009 Plan as of December 31, 2016, and changes during each of the years in the three-year period prior to December 31, 2016, were as follows:


	Shares			Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at December 31, 2013		55,536		$	31.33
Granted		21,684			41.51
Vested		(27,858	)		30.87
Forfeited		-			-

Unvested at December 31, 2014		49,362			36.07
Granted		21,024			47.70
Vested		(27,708	)		31.76
Forfeited		-			-

Unvested at December 31, 2015		42,678			44.59
Granted		99,140			16.90
Vested		(21,432	)		43.87
Forfeited		-			-

Unvested at December 31, 2016		120,386			22.06

3. ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES

Acquisitions

The Company accounts for all transactions that represent business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting, where the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquired entity are recognized and measured at their fair values on the date the Company obtains control in the acquiree. Such fair values that are not finalized for reporting periods following the acquisition date are estimated and recorded as provisional amounts. Adjustments to these provisional amounts during the measurement period (defined as the date through which all information required to identify and measure the consideration transferred, the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interests has been obtained, limited to one year from the acquisition date) are recorded as of the date of acquisition. Goodwill is determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration conveyed in the acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired.

Excluding acquisition and integration expenses related to the 2014 acquisition of HMA, approximately $5 million, $8 million and $13 million of acquisition costs related to prospective and closed acquisitions were expensed during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, are included in other operating expenses on the consolidated statements of (loss) income. Approximately $1 million and $69 million of acquisition and related integration expense related to the HMA acquisition were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

On April 1, 2016, one or more subsidiaries of the Company completed the acquisition of an 80% interest in Physicians’ Specialty Hospital (20 licensed beds), a Medicare-certified specialty surgical hospital in Fayetteville, Arkansas. The total cash consideration paid for the 80% ownership interest in this joint venture was approximately $12 million, with additional consideration of $2 million assumed in liabilities, for a total consideration of $14 million. The value of the noncontrolling interest at acquisition was $2 million. Based upon the Company’s final purchase price allocation relating to this acquisition as of December 31, 2016, approximately $12 million of goodwill has been recorded.

115

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

On March 1, 2016, one or more subsidiaries of the Company completed the acquisition of an 80% ownership interest in a joint venture entity with Indiana University Health that includes substantially all of the assets of IU Health La Porte Hospital (“La Porte”) in La Porte, Indiana (227 licensed beds) and IU Health Starke Hospital (“Starke”) in Knox, Indiana (50 licensed beds), and affiliated outpatient centers and physician practices. The total cash consideration paid for the 80% ownership interest in this joint venture was approximately $96 million with additional consideration of $8 million assumed in liabilities, for a total consideration of $104 million. The value of the noncontrolling interest at acquisition was $25 million. Based upon the Company’s final purchase price allocation relating to this acquisition as of December 31, 2016, approximately $45 million of goodwill has been recorded.

Effective November 1, 2014, the Company entered into and closed on a restructuring agreement related to the joint venture between an affiliate of the Company and an affiliate of Novant Health, Inc. (“Novant”), the non-profit joint venture partner. Through this joint venture, Novant owned an indirect noncontrolling interest in Lake Norman Regional Medical Center (“Lake Norman”), one of the former HMA hospitals. The HMA merger triggered a change in control provision in the operating agreement of this joint venture, requiring the Company to purchase the 30% noncontrolling interest in Lake Norman held by Novant for the higher of fair value or $150 million. As part of the restructuring agreement, on November 3, 2014, the Company paid Novant (1) $150 million for its 30% noncontrolling interest in Lake Norman, (2) approximately $4 million to acquire Upstate Carolina Medical Center (125 licensed beds) in Gaffney, South Carolina, and (3) approximately $5 million to settle prior claims with Novant. The amounts paid to Novant to acquire the noncontrolling interest in Lake Norman and to settle prior claims were recognized as part of the opening balance sheet in the purchase accounting for HMA. Based upon the Company’s final purchase price allocation relating to this acquisition as of December 31, 2015, no goodwill has been recorded related to the acquisition of Upstate Carolina Medical Center.

On October 1, 2014, one or more subsidiaries of the Company completed the acquisition of Natchez Regional Medical Center (179 licensed beds) in Natchez, Mississippi. The total cash consideration paid at closing for long-lived assets was $10 million. As part of the closing, the Company also paid $8 million as a prepayment for future property taxes that will be applied to the tax liability for the next 17 years. Based upon the Company’s final purchase price allocation relating to this acquisition as of December 31, 2015, no goodwill has been recorded.

Effective April 1, 2014, one or more subsidiaries of the Company completed the acquisition of Sharon Regional Health System in Sharon, Pennsylvania. This healthcare system includes Sharon Regional (258 licensed beds) and other outpatient and ancillary services. The total cash consideration paid for long-lived assets and working capital was approximately $67 million and $1 million, respectively, with additional consideration of $9 million assumed in liabilities, for a total consideration of $77 million. Based upon the Company’s final purchase price allocation relating to this acquisition as of December 31, 2015, approximately $8 million of goodwill has been recorded.

Effective April 1, 2014, one or more subsidiaries of the Company completed the acquisition of a 95% interest in Munroe Regional Medical Center (421 licensed beds) in Ocala, Florida and its other outpatient and ancillary services through a joint venture arrangement with an affiliate of a regional not-for-profit healthcare system, which acquired the remaining 5% interest. The total cash consideration paid for long-lived assets plus prepaid rent on the leased property and working capital was approximately $192 million and $4 million, respectively, with additional consideration of $11 million assumed in liabilities, for a total consideration of $207 million. The value of the noncontrolling interest at acquisition was $10 million. Based upon the Company’s final purchase price allocation relating to this acquisition as of December 31, 2015, approximately $11 million of goodwill has been recorded.

116

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The table below summarizes the allocations of the purchase price (including assumed liabilities) for the above hospital acquisition transactions (excluding HMA) in 2016 and 2014 (in millions) and reflects the fact that there were no hospital acquisitions in 2015:


	2016			2015		2014
Current assets	$	7			N/A	$	29
Property and equipment		69			N/A		257
Goodwill		57			N/A		19
Intangible assets		10			N/A		-
Other long-term assets		3			N/A		28
Liabilities		(10	)		N/A		(46	)
Noncontrolling interests		(28	)		N/A		(10	)

Total identifiable net assets	$	108			N/A	$	277

The operating results of the foregoing transactions have been included in the accompanying consolidated statements of (loss) income from their respective dates of acquisition, including net operating revenues of $214 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, from hospital acquisitions that closed during that year.

HMA Merger

On January 27, 2014, the Company completed the HMA merger by acquiring all the outstanding shares of HMA’s common stock for approximately $7.3 billion, including the assumption of approximately $3.8 billion of existing indebtedness, for consideration for each share of HMA’s common stock consisting of $10.50 in cash, 0.06942 of a share of the Company’s common stock, and one contingent value right (“CVR”). The CVR entitles the holder to receive a cash payment of up to $1.00 per CVR (subject to downward adjustment but not below zero), subject to the final resolution of certain legal matters pertaining to HMA, as defined in the CVR agreement. At the time of the completion of the HMA merger, HMA owned and operated 71 hospitals in 15 states in non-urban communities located primarily in the southeastern United States.

In connection with the HMA merger, the Company and CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. (“CHS”) entered into a third amendment and restatement of its credit facility, providing for additional financing and recapitalization of certain of the Company’s term loans. In addition, the Company and CHS also issued in connection with the HMA merger: (i) $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 and (ii) $3.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022.

The total consideration of the HMA merger has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their respective fair values, resulting in approximately $4.5 billion of goodwill resulting from the final purchase price allocation at December 31, 2014. The purchase price represented a premium over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired for reasons such as:

•

the expansion of the number of markets in which the Company operates in existing states;

•

the extension and strengthening of the Company’s hospital and physician networks;

•

the centralization of many support functions; and

•

the elimination of duplicate corporate functions.

117

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The table below summarizes the calculation of consideration paid and allocations of the purchase price (including assumed liabilities and long-term debt assumed and repaid at closing) for the HMA merger (in millions):


Cash paid	$	2,778
Shares issued		736
Contingent value right		17

Total consideration	$	3,531


Current assets	$	1,519
Property and equipment		2,895
Goodwill		4,494
Intangible assets		112
Other long-term assets		508
Liabilities		(5,662	)
Noncontrolling interests		(335	)

Total identifiable net assets	$	3,531

The allocation process requires the analysis of acquired fixed assets, contracts, contractual commitments, and legal contingencies to identify and record the fair value of all assets acquired and liabilities assumed. All goodwill related to HMA is recorded in the hospital operations reporting unit.

Net operating revenues and income from continuing operations before income taxes and allocation of both interest and corporate overhead from hospitals acquired from HMA from the date of acquisition through December 31, 2014 was approximately $5.3 billion and $564 million, respectively.

Other Acquisitions

During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, one or more subsidiaries of the Company paid approximately $16 million, $51 million and $29 million, respectively, to acquire the operating assets and related businesses of certain physician practices, clinics and other ancillary businesses that operate within the communities served by the Company’s affiliated hospitals. In connection with these acquisitions, during the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company allocated approximately $8 million of the consideration paid to property and equipment and net working capital and the remainder, approximately $14 million consisting of intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition, to goodwill. The value of the noncontrolling interest recorded in these acquisitions was $6 million. During 2015, the Company allocated approximately $19 million of the consideration paid to property and equipment and net working capital and the remainder, approximately $39 million consisting of intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition, to goodwill. The value of noncontrolling interest acquired in these acquisitions was $7 million. During 2014, the Company allocated approximately $15 million of the consideration paid to property and equipment and net working capital and the remainder, approximately $14 million consisting of intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition, to goodwill.

Divestitures

In April 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-08, which changes the requirements for reporting discontinued operations. A discontinued operation is a disposal that represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. Additional disclosures are required for significant

118

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

components of the entity that are disposed of or are held for sale but do not qualify as discontinued operations. This ASU was adopted on January 1, 2015 and is required to be applied on a prospective basis for disposals or components initially classified as held for sale after adoption. As a result, the following divestitures occurring subsequent to the date of adoption are included in continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Additionally, the impact of the hospitals and other assets spun off to QHC are discussed in Note 4 below.

On December 31, 2016, one or more subsidiaries of the Company sold an 80% majority ownership interest in the home care division to a subsidiary of Almost Family, Inc. for $128 million. In connection with the divestiture of a controlling interest in the home care division, the Company recorded a gain of approximately $91 million during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Effective September 3, 2016, one or more subsidiaries of the Company finalized an agreement to terminate the lease and cease operations of Alliance Health Blackwell (53 licensed beds) in Blackwell, Oklahoma, agreeing to terminate the lease with the landlord, The Blackwell Hospital Trust Authority. Income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 includes an impairment charge of approximately $3 million related to the write-off of certain intangible assets abandoned as part of exiting the lease to operate this hospital.

Effective February 1, 2016, one or more subsidiaries of the Company sold Lehigh Regional Medical Center (88 licensed beds) in Lehigh Acres, Florida, (“Lehigh”) and related outpatient services to Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Prime”) for approximately $11 million in cash. In connection with the divestiture of Lehigh, the Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $4 million related to the allocated hospital reporting unit goodwill in 2016.

Effective January 1, 2016, one or more subsidiaries of the Company sold Bartow Regional Medical Center (72 licensed beds) in Bartow, Florida, (“Bartow”) and related outpatient services to BayCare Health Systems, Inc. for approximately $60 million in cash, which was received at a preliminary closing on December 31, 2015. In connection with the divestiture of Bartow, the Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $5 million related to the allocated hospital reporting unit goodwill in 2016.

Effective July 31, 2015, one or more subsidiaries of the Company sold certain assets used in the operation of Payson Regional Medical Center (44 licensed beds) in Payson, Arizona (“Payson”) to Banner Health for approximately $20 million in cash. The Company previously operated Payson under the terms of an operating lease with Mogollon Health Alliance, Inc., an Arizona nonprofit corporation, that expired on July 31, 2015. The lease termination and sale closed effective July 31, 2015.

The financial results included in discontinued operations for divestitures or hospitals held for sale at December 31, 2014, prior to the Company’s adoption of ASU 2014-08, are summarized below.

During the three months ended June 30, 2015, one or more subsidiaries of the Company finalized an agreement to terminate the lease and cease operations of Fallbrook Hospital (47 licensed beds) in Fallbrook, California. In agreeing to terminate the lease, the Company received approximately $3 million in cash from the Fallbrook Healthcare District, as the landlord, as consideration for certain operating assets of the hospital.

Effective April 1, 2015, one or more subsidiaries of the Company sold Chesterfield General Hospital (59 licensed beds) in Cheraw, South Carolina and Marlboro Park Hospital (102 licensed beds) in Bennettsville, South Carolina and related outpatient services to M/C Healthcare, LLC for approximately $4 million in cash.

Effective March 1, 2015 one or more subsidiaries of the Company sold Dallas Regional Medical Center (202 licensed beds) in Mesquite, Texas to Prime for approximately $25 million in cash.

119

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Effective March 1, 2015 one or more subsidiaries of the Company sold Riverview Regional Medical Center (281 licensed beds) in Gadsden, Alabama to Prime for approximately $25 million in cash. This hospital was required to be divested by the Federal Trade Commission as a condition of its approval of the HMA merger.

Effective February 1, 2015, one or more subsidiaries of the Company sold Harris Hospital (133 licensed beds) in Newport, Arkansas and related healthcare services to White County Medical Center in Searcy, Arkansas for approximately $5 million in cash.

Effective January 1, 2015, one or more subsidiaries of the Company sold Carolina Pines Regional Medical Center (116 licensed beds) in Hartsville, South Carolina and related outpatient services to Capella Healthcare for approximately $74 million in cash, which was received at the closing on December 31, 2014. This hospital was required to be divested by the Federal Trade Commission as a condition of its approval of the HMA merger.

On November 3, 2014, one or more subsidiaries of the Company sold Special Care Hospital (67 licensed beds) located in Nanticoke, Pennsylvania, which is a long-term acute care hospital, to Post Acute Medical, LLC for approximately $3 million in cash.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company made the decision to sell and began actively marketing several smaller hospitals. In addition, HMA entered into a definitive agreement to sell Williamson Memorial Hospital (76 licensed beds) located in Williamson, West Virginia prior to the HMA merger, and the Company has continued the effort to divest this facility. In connection with management’s decision to sell these hospitals and the sale of the seven hospitals (excluding Payson) noted above during 2015, the Company has classified the results of operations of such hospitals as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of (loss) income, and classified these hospitals as held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Net operating revenues and loss from discontinued operations for the respective periods are as follows (in millions):


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Net operating revenues	$	99		$	114		$	426

Loss from operations of entities sold or held for sale before income taxes		(11	)		(42	)		(11	)
Impairment of hospitals sold or held for sale		(12	)		(8	)		(71	)
Loss on sale, net		-			(6	)		-

Loss from discontinued operations, before taxes		(23	)		(56	)		(82	)
Income tax benefit		(8	)		(20	)		(25	)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes	$	(15	)	$	(36	)	$	(57	)

Interest expense was allocated to discontinued operations based on sale proceeds available for debt repayment.

Other Hospital Closures

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company announced the planned closure of McNairy Regional Hospital in Selmer, Tennessee. The Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016, to adjust the fair value of the supplies inventory and

120

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

long-lived assets of this hospital, including property and equipment and capitalized software costs, based on their estimated fair value and future utilization. McNairy Regional Hospital closed on May 19, 2016. No additional impairment was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2016.

4. SPIN-OFF OF QUORUM HEALTH CORPORATION

On April 29, 2016, the Company completed the spin-off of 38 hospitals and Quorum Health Resources, LLC into Quorum Health Corporation, an independent, publicly traded corporation. The transaction was structured to be generally tax free to the Company and its stockholders. The Company distributed, on a pro rata basis, all of the shares of QHC common stock to the Company’s stockholders of record as of April 22, 2016. These stockholders of record as of April 22, 2016 received a distribution of one share of QHC common stock for every four shares of Company common stock held as of the record date plus cash in lieu of any fractional shares. In recognition of the spin-off, the Company recorded a non-cash dividend of approximately $713 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, representing the net assets of QHC distributed to the Company’s stockholders. Immediately following the completion of the spin-off, the Company’s stockholders owned 100% of the outstanding shares of QHC common stock. Following the spin-off, QHC became an independent public company with its common stock listed for trading under the symbol “QHC” on the New York Stock Exchange.

In connection with the spin-off, the Company and QHC entered into a separation and distribution agreement as well as certain ancillary agreements on April 29, 2016. These agreements allocate between the Company and QHC the various assets, employees, liabilities and obligations (including investments, property and employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) that comprise the separate companies and govern certain relationships between, and activities of, the Company and QHC for a period of time after the spin-off.

The results of operations for QHC through the date of the spin-off are presented in continuing operations in the consolidated statements of (loss) income as the Company has determined that the spin-off of QHC does not meet the criteria as discontinued operations under ASU 2014-08.

Financial and statistical data reported in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) include QHC operating results through April 29, 2016. Summary financial results of QHC for the periods included in the accompanying consolidated statements of (loss) income are as follows:


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015		2014
(Loss) income from operations before income taxes	$	(12	)	$	21	$	14
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interests		1			3		-

(Loss) income from operations before income taxes attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc.	$	(13	)	$	18	$	14

121

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

5. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows (in millions):


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
Balance, beginning of year	$	8,965		$	8,951
Goodwill acquired as part of acquisitions during current year		71			39
Consideration and purchase price allocation adjustments for prior year’s acquisitions and other adjustments		-			11
Goodwill allocated to QHC in the spin-off		(709	)		-
Goodwill in the home care operations reporting unit included in the sale of a majority interest in the home care division		(46	)		-
Goodwill allocated to hospitals held for sale		(365	)		(36	)
Impairment of goodwill		(1,395	)		-

Balance, end of year	$	6,521		$	8,965

Goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit, which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment (referred to as a component of the entity). Management has determined that the Company’s operating segments meet the criteria to be classified as reporting units. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company allocated approximately $709 million of goodwill to the spin-off of QHC, including approximately $33 million of goodwill related to the former management services reporting unit and approximately $676 million of goodwill allocated from the hospital operations reporting unit based on the relative fair value of the hospitals that were included in the QHC distribution. Additionally, the Company allocated approximately $46 million of goodwill related to the sale of the home care operations reporting unit on December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2016, after giving effect to the disposition of QHC, the sale of an 80% majority ownership interest in the Company’s home care division and the $1.395 billion impairment charge discussed below, the Company had approximately $6.5 billion of goodwill recorded, all of which resides at its hospital operations reporting unit.

Goodwill is evaluated for impairment at the same time every year and when an event occurs or circumstances change that, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. There is a two-step method for determining goodwill impairment. Step one is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit with the unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill. If this test indicates the fair value is less than the carrying value, then step two is required to compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill utilizing a hypothetical purchase price allocation with the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. The Company performed its last annual goodwill evaluation during the fourth quarter of 2016. No impairment was indicated by this evaluation. The next annual goodwill evaluation will be performed during the fourth quarter of 2017, or sooner if the Company identifies certain indicators of impairment.

While no impairment was indicated by the fourth quarter of 2016 evaluation, the reduction in the Company’s fair value and the resulting goodwill impairment charge recorded during 2016 reduced the excess of fair value calculated in the step two analysis over the carrying value of the Company’s hospital operations reporting unit to an amount less than 1% of the Company’s carrying value. This minimal amount in the excess fair value over carrying value of the hospital operations reporting unit increases the risk that future declines in fair value could result in goodwill impairment. The determination of fair value in step one of the Company’s goodwill

122

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

impairment analysis is based on an estimate of fair value for each reporting unit utilizing known and estimated inputs at the evaluation date. Some of those inputs include, but are not limited to, the most recent price of the Company’s common stock or fair value of long-term debt, estimates of future revenue and expense growth, estimated market multiples expected capital expenditures, income tax rates, and costs of invested capital. Future estimates of fair value could be adversely affected if the actual outcome of one or more of these assumptions changes materially in the future, including further decline in the Company’s stock price or fair value of long-term debt, lower than expected hospital volumes, or increased operating costs. Such changes impacting the calculation of fair value could result in a material impairment charge in the future.

The Company estimates the fair value of the related reporting units using both a discounted cash flow model as well as a market multiple model. The cash flow forecasts are adjusted by an appropriate discount rate based on the Company’s estimate of a market participant’s weighted-average cost of capital. These models are both based on the Company’s best estimate of future revenues and operating costs and are reconciled to the Company’s consolidated market capitalization, with consideration of the amount a potential acquirer would be required to pay, in the form of a control premium, in order to gain sufficient ownership to set policies, direct operations and control management decisions.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, the Company identified certain indicators of impairment requiring an interim goodwill impairment evaluation. Those indicators were primarily the decline in the Company’s market capitalization and fair value of long-term debt during the three months ended June 30, 2016, as well as a decrease in the estimated future earnings of the Company compared to the Company’s most recent annual evaluation. The Company performed an estimated calculation of fair value in step one of the impairment test at June 30, 2016, which indicated that the carrying value of its hospital operations reporting unit exceeded its fair value. An initial step two calculation was performed to determine the implied value of goodwill in a hypothetical purchase price allocation. The Company recorded an estimated non-cash impairment charge of $1.4 billion to goodwill at June 30, 2016 based on these analyses, and adjusted the estimated impairment charge based on the final step two valuation of $1.395 billion at September 30, 2016. The decrease in the goodwill impairment as of September 30, 2016, from the original estimate as of June 30, 2016, was primarily due to lower estimated fair values of the individual hospital property and equipment assets as compared to the assumptions used in the June 30, 2016 estimate, resulting in a higher implied goodwill amount when applied to a hypothetical purchase price allocation as required in the step two analysis. This impairment charge taken during 2016 represents the cumulative amount of impairment recorded historically on the Company’s goodwill.

The determination of fair value of the Company’s hospital operations reporting unit represents a Level 3 fair value measurement in the fair value hierarchy due to its use of internal projections and unobservable measurement inputs.

These impairment charges do not have an impact on the calculation of the Company’s financial covenants under the Company’s Credit Facility.

Intangible Assets

Approximately $10 million of intangible assets other than goodwill were acquired during the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily related to the preliminary fair value of the tradename intangible asset associated with the La Porte and Starke acquisitions. The gross carrying amount of the Company’s other intangible assets subject to amortization was $41 million and $82 million at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and the net carrying amount was $14 million and $31 million at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The carrying amount of the Company’s other intangible assets not subject to amortization was $86 million and $121 million at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Other intangible assets are included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

123

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Substantially all of the Company’s intangible assets are contract-based intangible assets related to operating licenses, management contracts, or non-compete agreements entered into in connection with prior acquisitions.

The weighted-average remaining amortization period for the intangible assets subject to amortization is approximately six years. There are no expected residual values related to these intangible assets. Amortization expense on these intangible assets was $14 million, $15 million and $13 million during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amortization expense on intangible assets is estimated to be $4 million in 2017, $3 million in 2018, $1 million in 2019, $1 million in 2020, $1 million in 2021 and $4 million thereafter.

The gross carrying amount of capitalized software for internal use was approximately $1.3 billion and $1.5 billion at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and the net carrying amount was approximately $574 million and $771 million at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The estimated amortization period for capitalized internal-use software is generally three years, except for capitalized costs related to significant system conversions, which is generally eight to ten years. There is no expected residual value for capitalized internal-use software. At December 31, 2016, there was approximately $33 million of capitalized costs for internal-use software that is currently in the development stage and will begin amortization once the software project is complete and ready for its intended use. Amortization expense on capitalized internal-use software was $201 million, $212 million and $260 million during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amortization expense on capitalized internal-use software is estimated to be $176 million in 2017, $125 million in 2018, $83 million in 2019, $60 million in 2020, $48 million in 2021 and $82 million thereafter.

In connection with the HMA merger, the Company further analyzed its intangible assets related to internal-use software used in certain of its hospitals for patient and clinical systems, including software required to meet criteria for meaningful use attestation and ICD-10 compliance. This analysis resulted in management reassessing its usage of certain software products and rationalizing that, with the addition of the HMA hospitals in the first quarter of 2014, those software applications were going to be discontinued and replaced with new applications that better integrate meaningful use and ICD-10 compliance, are more cost effective and can be implemented at a greater efficiency of scale over future implementations. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $24 million related to software in-process that was abandoned and the acceleration of amortization of approximately $75 million related to shortening the remaining useful life of software abandoned.

124

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

6. INCOME TAXES

The (benefit from) provision for income taxes for (loss) income from continuing operations consists of the following (in millions):


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Current:
Federal	$	5		$	7		$	(29	)
State		7			7			3

		12			14			(26	)
Deferred:
Federal		(88	)		103			106
State		(28	)		(1	)		2

		(116	)		102			108

Total (benefit from) provision for income taxes for (loss) income from continuing operations	$	(104	)	$	116		$	82

The following table reconciles the differences between the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective tax rate (dollars in millions):


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016						2015						2014
	Amount			%			Amount			%			Amount			%
Provision for income taxes at statutory federal rate	$	(600	)		35.0	%	$	144			35.0	%	$	120			35.0	%
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit		(1	)		0.1			13			3.3			11			3.2
Release of unrecognized tax benefit		-			-			-			-			(9	)		(2.6	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(33	)		1.9			(35	)		(8.6	)		(39	)		(11.5	)
Change in valuation allowance		(1	)		0.1			(2	)		(0.4	)		-			-
Federal and state tax credits		(6	)		0.3			(5	)		(1.2	)		(4	)		(1.2	)
Nondeductible transaction costs		3			(0.2	)		-			-			3			0.9
Nondeductible goodwill		536			(31.2	)		-			-			-			-
Other		(2	)		0.1			1			0.3			-			-

(Benefit from) provision for income taxes and effective tax rate for (loss) income from continuing operations	$	(104	)		6.1	%	$	116			28.4	%	$	82			23.8	%

The Company’s effective tax rates were 6.1%, 28.4% and 23.8% for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Including the net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, which is not tax effected in the consolidated statement of (loss) income, the effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 would have been 5.7%, 37.6% and 35.5% respectively. This decrease in the Company’s effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2016, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, was primarily due to the non-deductible nature of goodwill written off for impairment and divestitures, as well as the non-deductible nature of certain costs incurred to complete the spin-off of QHC.

125

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Deferred income taxes are based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities under the provisions of the enacted tax laws. Deferred income taxes as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 consist of (in millions):


	December 31,
	2016					2015
	Assets			Liabilities		Assets			Liabilities
Net operating loss and credit carryforwards	$	412		$	-	$	609		$	-
Property and equipment		-			583		-			836
Self-insurance liabilities		130			-		149			-
Prepaid expenses		-			61		-			62
Intangibles		-			238		-			353
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates		-			81		-			133
Other liabilities		-			22		-			16
Long-term debt and interest		-			12		-			20
Accounts receivable		70			-		21			-
Accrued vacation		56			-		66			-
Other comprehensive income		38			-		45			-
Stock-based compensation		23			-		31			-
Deferred compensation		132			-		125			-
Other		125			-		117			-

		986			997		1,163			1,420
Valuation allowance		(385	)		-		(336	)		-

Total deferred income taxes	$	601		$	997	$	827		$	1,420

The Company believes that the net deferred tax assets will ultimately be realized, except as noted below. Its conclusion is based on its estimate of future taxable income and the expected timing of temporary difference reversals. The Company has state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $5.5 billion, which expire from 2017 to 2036. The Company also has unrecognized deferred tax assets primarily related to interest expense that are included in other comprehensive income. If recognized, additional state net operating losses will be created which the Company does not expect to be able to utilize prior to the expiration of the carryforward period. A valuation allowance of approximately $4 million has been recognized for those items. With respect to the deferred tax liability pertaining to intangibles, as included above, goodwill purchased in connection with certain of the Company’s business acquisitions is amortizable for income tax reporting purposes. However, for financial reporting purposes, there is no corresponding amortization allowed with respect to such purchased goodwill.

The valuation allowance increased by $49 million and $56 million during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In addition to amounts previously discussed, the change in valuation allowance relates to a redetermination of the amount of, and realizability of, net operating losses and credits in certain income tax jurisdictions.

The total amount of unrecognized benefit that would affect the effective tax rate, if recognized, was approximately $9 million as of December 31, 2016. A total of approximately $3 million of interest and penalties is included in the amount of the liability for uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2016. It is the Company’s policy to recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized benefits in its consolidated statements of (loss) income as income tax expense.

126

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

It is possible the amount of unrecognized tax benefit could change in the next 12 months as a result of a lapse of the statute of limitations and settlements with taxing authorities; however, the Company does not anticipate the change will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or consolidated financial position.

The following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amount of unrecognized tax benefit for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (in millions):


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Unrecognized tax benefit, beginning of year	$	15		$	16		$	-
Gross increases — assumed liability of acquired entity		-			-			26
Gross increases — tax positions in current period		4			-			-
Reductions — tax positions in prior period		-			-			(8	)
Lapse of statute of limitations		(1	)		(1	)		(1	)
Settlements		-			-			(1	)

Unrecognized tax benefit, end of year	$	18		$	15		$	16

The Company, or one of its subsidiaries, files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. The Company has extended the federal statute of limitations through March 31, 2017 for Triad Hospitals, Inc. for the tax periods ended December 31, 1999, December 31, 2000, April 30, 2001, June 30, 2001, December 31, 2001, December 31, 2002, December 31, 2003, December 31, 2004, December 31, 2005, December 31, 2006 and July 25, 2007. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to state income tax examinations for years prior to 2012. The Company’s federal income tax returns for the 2009 and 2010 tax years are currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company believes the results of these examinations will not be material to its consolidated results of operations or consolidated financial position. The Company has extended the federal statute of limitations through January 31, 2018 for Community Health Systems, Inc. for the tax periods ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010, and through December 31, 2017 for the tax periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2012.

Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds received, resulted in a net cash refund of $16 million and $180 million during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2014, respectively, and net cash paid of $12 million during the year ended December 31, 2015.

127

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

7. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt, net of debt issuance costs and discounts or premiums, consists of the following (in millions):


	December 31,
	2016			2015
Credit Facility:
Term A Loan	$	745		$	844
Term F Loan		1,435			1,671
Term G Loan		1,510			1,568
Term H Loan		2,776			2,884
Revolving credit loans		(10	)		147
8% Senior Notes due 2019		1,920			1,992
7¹⁄₈% Senior Notes due 2020		1,189			1,186
5¹⁄₈% Senior Secured Notes due 2018		698			1,587
5¹⁄₈% Senior Secured Notes due 2021		972			967
6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes due 2022		2,932			2,921
Receivables Facility		675			699
Capital lease obligations		328			227
Other		74			92

Total debt		15,244			16,785
Less current maturities		(455	)		(229	)

Total long-term debt	$	14,789		$	16,556

The amounts in the table above represent the outstanding principal balance for each debt issue at the respective balance sheet date, adjusted for the unamortized balance of deferred debt issuance costs and any debt premium or discount.

Credit Facility

The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, CHS, has senior secured financing under a credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions led by Credit Suisse, as administrative agent and collateral agent. In connection with the HMA merger, the Company and CHS entered into a third amendment and restatement of its credit facility (the “Credit Facility”), providing for additional financing and recapitalization of certain of the Company’s term loans, including (i) the replacement of the revolving credit facility with a new $1.0 billion revolving facility maturing in 2019 (the “Revolving Facility”), (ii) the addition of a new $1.0 billion Term A facility due 2019 (the “Term A Facility”), (iii) a Term D facility in an aggregate principal amount equal to approximately $4.6 billion due 2021 (which included certain term C loans that were converted into such Term D facility (collectively, the “Term D Facility”)), (iv) the conversion of certain term C loans into Term E Loans and the borrowing of new Term E Loans in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $1.7 billion due 2017 and (v) the addition of flexibility commensurate with the Company’s post-acquisition structure. In addition to funding a portion of the consideration in connection with the HMA merger, some of the proceeds of the Term A Facility and Term D Facility were used to refinance the outstanding $637 million existing term A facility due 2016 and the $60 million of term B loans due 2014, respectively. The Revolving Facility includes a subfacility for letters of credit.

128

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Facility”) and a new approximately $2.9 billion incremental Term H facility due 2021 (the “Term H Facility”). The proceeds of the Term G Facility and Term H Facility were used to repay the Company’s existing Term D Facility in full. Pursuant to a special distribution paid by QHC to the Company as part of the series of transactions to complete the spin-off, the Company received approximately $1.2 billion in cash generated from the net proceeds of certain financing arrangements entered into by QHC as part of the separation. On April 29, 2016, using part of the cash generated from the QHC spin-off, the Company repaid approximately $190 million of its Term F Facility. On December 30, 2016, using the cash generated from the sale of a majority ownership in the Company’s home care division and from the completion of the sale-lease back transaction for ten of the Company’s owned medical office buildings, the Company repaid approximately $48 million of the Term F Facility, approximately $26 million of the Term A Facility, approximately $52 million of the Term G Facility and $96 million of the Term H Facility.

On December 5, 2016, CHS entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Facility (“Amendment No. 2”) to adjust upward the maximum leverage ratios and adjust downward the minimum interest coverage ratio the Company is required to comply with each fiscal quarter under the financial maintenance covenants in the Credit Facility. In connection with the amendment, the Company agreed to certain other additional undertakings for the benefit of the lenders under the Revolving Facility and the Term A Facility.

The loans under the Credit Facility bear interest on the outstanding unpaid principal amount at a rate equal to an applicable percentage plus, at CHS’ option, either (a) an Alternate Base Rate (as defined) determined by reference to the greater of (1) the Prime Rate (as defined) announced by Credit Suisse or (2) the Federal Funds Effective Rate (as defined) plus 0.50% or (3) the adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) on such day for a three-month interest period commencing on the second business day after such day plus 1% or (b) LIBOR. Loans in respect of the Revolving Facility and the Term A Facility will accrue interest at a rate per annum initially equal to LIBOR plus 2.75%, in the case of LIBOR borrowings, and Alternate Base Rate plus 1.75%, in the case of Alternate Base Rate borrowings. In addition, the margin in respect of the Revolving Facility and the Term A Facility will be subject to adjustment determined by reference to a leverage-based pricing grid. Loans in respect of the Term F Facility will accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.25%, in the case of LIBOR borrowings, and Alternate Base Rate plus 2.25%, in the case of Alternate Base Rate borrowings. The Term G Loan and Term H Loan will accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 2.75% and 3.00%, respectively, in the case of LIBOR borrowings, and Alternate Base Rate plus 1.75% and 2.00%, respectively, in the case of Alternate Base Rate borrowings. The Term G Loan and the Term H Loan are subject to a 1.00% LIBOR floor and a 2.00% Alternate Base Rate floor.

The term loan facility must be prepaid in an amount equal to (1) 100% of the net cash proceeds of certain asset sales and dispositions by the Company and its subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions and reinvestment rights (provided that, in connection with Amendment No. 2, CHS agreed with the lenders under the Revolving Facility and the Term A Facility not to exercise such reinvestment rights prior to January 1, 2018), (2) 100% of the net cash proceeds of issuances of certain debt obligations or receivables-based financing by the Company and its subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions, and (3) 50%, subject to reduction to a lower percentage based on the Company’s leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Facility generally as the ratio of total debt on the date of determination to the Company’s EBITDA, as defined, for the four quarters most recently ended prior to such date), of excess cash flow (as defined) for any year, subject to certain exceptions. Voluntary prepayments and commitment reductions are permitted in whole or in part, without any premium or penalty, subject to minimum prepayment or reduction requirements.

129

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The borrower under the Credit Facility is CHS. All of the obligations under the Credit Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by the Company and certain of its existing and subsequently acquired or organized domestic subsidiaries. All obligations under the Credit Facility and the related guarantees are secured by a perfected first priority lien or security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Company, CHS and each subsidiary guarantor, including equity interests held by the Company, CHS or any subsidiary guarantor, but excluding, among others, the equity interests of non-significant subsidiaries, syndication subsidiaries, securitization subsidiaries and joint venture subsidiaries. Such assets constitute substantially the same assets, subject to certain exceptions, that secure CHS’ obligations under the 2018 Senior Secured Notes (as defined below) and the 2021 Senior Secured Notes (as defined below).

CHS has agreed to pay letter of credit fees equal to the applicable percentage then in effect with respect to LIBOR borrowings under the Revolving Facility times the maximum aggregate amount available to be drawn under all letters of credit outstanding under the subfacility for letters of credit. The issuer of any letter of credit issued under the subfacility for letters of credit will also receive a customary fronting fee and other customary processing charges. CHS is obligated to pay commitment fees of 0.50% per annum (subject to adjustment based upon the Company’s leverage ratio) on the unused portion of the Revolving Facility.

The Credit Facility contains customary representations and warranties, subject to limitations and exceptions, and customary covenants restricting the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ ability, subject to certain exceptions, to, among other things (1) declare dividends, make distributions or redeem or repurchase capital stock, (2) prepay, redeem or repurchase other debt, (3) incur liens or grant negative pledges, (4) make loans and investments and enter into acquisitions and joint ventures, (5) incur additional indebtedness or provide certain guarantees, (6) make capital expenditures, (7) engage in mergers, acquisitions and asset sales, (8) conduct transactions with affiliates, (9) alter the nature of the Company’s businesses, (10) grant certain guarantees with respect to physician practices, (11) engage in sale and leaseback transactions or (12) change the Company’s fiscal year. The Company is also required to comply with specified financial covenants (consisting of a maximum secured net leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio) and various affirmative covenants. Under the Credit Facility, the secured net leverage ratio is calculated as the ratio of total secured debt, less unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, to consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Facility, and the interest coverage ratio is the ratio of consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Facility, to consolidated interest expense for the period. The calculation of consolidated EBITDA as defined in the Credit Facility is a trailing 12-month calculation that begins with net income attributable to the Company, with certain pro forma adjustments to consider the impact of material acquisitions or divestitures, and adjustments for interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, stock compensation expense, restructuring costs, and the financial impact of other non-cash or non-recurring items recorded during any such 12-month period. For the 12-month period ended December 31, 2016, the secured net leverage ratio financial covenant in the Credit Facility limited the ratio of secured debt to EBITDA, as defined, to less than or equal to 4.50 to 1.00, which will decrease to 4.00 to 1.00 on January 1, 2018. For the 12-month period ended December 31, 2016, the interest coverage ratio financial covenant in the Credit Facility required the ratio of consolidated EBITDA, as defined, to consolidated interest expense to be greater than or equal to 2.00 to 1.00, which will increase to 2.25 to 1.00 on January 1, 2018. The Company was in compliance with all such covenants at December 31, 2016, with a secured net leverage ratio of approximately 3.96 to 1.00 and an interest coverage ratio of approximately 2.43 to 1.00.

Events of default under the Credit Facility include, but are not limited to, (1) CHS’ failure to pay principal, interest, fees or other amounts under the credit agreement when due (taking into account any applicable grace period), (2) any representation or warranty proving to have been materially incorrect when made, (3) covenant defaults subject, with respect to certain covenants, to an available cure through the issuance of qualified equity for a period of 60 days after the end of the first three quarters and 100 days after a year end, (4) bankruptcy and insolvency events, (5) a cross default to certain other debt, (6) certain undischarged judgments (not paid within

130

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

an applicable grace period), (7) a change of control (as defined), (8) certain ERISA-related defaults and (9) the invalidity or impairment of specified security interests, guarantees or subordination provisions in favor of the administrative agent or lenders under the Credit Facility.

As of December 31, 2016, the availability for additional borrowings under the Credit Facility, subject to certain limitations as set forth in the Credit Facility, was approximately $1.0 billion pursuant to the Revolving Facility, of which $55 million is in the form of outstanding letters of credit. CHS has the ability to amend the Credit Facility to provide for one or more tranches of term loans or increases in the Revolving Facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1.5 billion, only $750 million of which is effectively available because of the Company’s additional undertakings in connection with Amendment No. 2. As of December 31, 2016, the weighted-average interest rate under the Credit Facility, excluding swaps, was 5.0%.

As of December 31, 2016, the term loans and outstanding revolving credit loans are scheduled to be paid with principal payments for future years as follows (in millions):


Year	Amount
2017	$	149
2018		1,895
2019		1,678
2020		29
2021		2,782
Thereafter		-

Total maturities		6,533
Less: Deferred debt issuance costs		(77	)

Total term loans and outstanding revolving credit loans	$	6,456

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had letters of credit issued, primarily in support of potential insurance-related claims and certain bonds, of approximately $55 million.

8% Senior Notes due 2019

On November 22, 2011, CHS completed an offering of $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 8% Senior Notes due 2019 (the “8% Senior Notes”), which were issued in a private placement. The net proceeds from this issuance, together with available cash on hand, were used to finance the purchase of up to $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of CHS’ then outstanding 8⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes due 2015 and related fees and expenses. On March 21, 2012, CHS completed an offering of an additional $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 8% Senior Notes, which were issued in a private placement (at a premium of 102.5%). The net proceeds from this issuance were used to finance the purchase of approximately $850 million aggregate principal amount of CHS’ then outstanding 8⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes due 2015, to pay related fees and expenses and for general corporate purposes. The 8% Senior Notes bear interest at 8% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on May 15 and November 15, commencing May 15, 2012. Interest on the 8% Senior Notes accrues from the date of original issuance. Interest is calculated on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months.

131

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

CHS is entitled, at its option, to redeem all or a portion of the 8% Senior Notes upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ notice, at the following redemption prices (expressed as a percentage of principal amount on the redemption date), plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date (subject to the right of holders of record on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date), if redeemed during the periods set forth below:


Period	Redemption Price
November 15, 2016 to November 14, 2017		102.000%
November 15, 2017 to November 14, 2019		100.000%

Pursuant to a registration rights agreement entered into at the time of the issuance of the 8% Senior Notes, as a result of an exchange offer made by CHS, substantially all of the 8% Senior Notes issued in November 2011 and March 2012 were exchanged in May 2012 for new notes (the “8% Exchange Notes”) having terms substantially identical in all material respects to the 8% Senior Notes (except that the 8% Exchange Notes were issued under a registration statement pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”)). References to the 8% Senior Notes shall also be deemed to include the 8% Exchange Notes unless the context provides otherwise.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company repurchased approximately $75 million of aggregate principal amount outstanding of the 8% Senior Notes in open market transactions.

7¹⁄₈% Senior Notes due 2020

On July 18, 2012, CHS completed an underwritten public offering under its automatic shelf registration statement filed with the SEC of $1.2 billion aggregate principal amount of 7¹⁄₈% Senior Notes due 2020 (the “7¹⁄₈% Senior Notes”). The net proceeds from this issuance were used to finance the purchase or redemption of $934 million aggregate principal amount of CHS’ then outstanding 8⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes due 2015, to pay for consents delivered in connection with a related tender offer, to pay related fees and expenses, and for general corporate purposes. The 7¹⁄₈% Senior Notes bear interest at 7.125% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on July 15 and January 15, commencing January 15, 2013. Interest on the 7¹⁄₈% Senior Notes accrues from the date of original issuance. Interest is calculated on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months.

CHS is entitled, at its option, to redeem all or a portion of the 7¹⁄₈% Senior Notes upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ notice, at the following redemption prices (expressed as a percentage of principal amount on the redemption date), plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date (subject to the right of holders of record on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date), if redeemed during the periods set forth below:


Period	Redemption Price
July 15, 2016 to July 14, 2017		103.563 %
July 15, 2017 to July 14, 2018		101.781 %
July 15, 2018 to July 15, 2020		100.000 %

5¹⁄₈% Senior Secured Notes due 2018

On August 17, 2012, CHS completed an underwritten public offering under its automatic shelf registration statement filed with the SEC of $1.6 billion aggregate principal amount of 5¹⁄₈% Senior Secured Notes due 2018 (the “2018 Senior Secured Notes”). The net proceeds from this issuance, together with available cash on hand, were used to finance the prepayment of $1.6 billion of the then outstanding term loans due 2014 under the Credit

132

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Facility and related fees and expenses. The 2018 Senior Secured Notes bear interest at 5.125% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on August 15 and February 15, commencing February 15, 2013. Interest on the 2018 Senior Secured Notes accrues from the date of original issuance. Interest is calculated on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months. The 2018 Senior Secured Notes are secured by a first-priority lien subject to a shared lien of equal priority with certain other obligations, including obligations under the Credit Facility, and subject to prior ranking liens permitted by the indenture governing the 2018 Senior Secured Notes on substantially the same assets, subject to certain exceptions, that secure CHS’ obligations under the Credit Facility.

CHS is entitled, at its option, to redeem all or a portion of the 2018 Senior Secured Notes upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ notice, at the following redemption prices (expressed as a percentage of principal amount on the redemption date), plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date (subject to the right of holders of record on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date), if redeemed during the periods set forth below:


Period	Redemption Price
August 15, 2016 to August 14, 2017		101.281 %
August 15, 2017 to August 14, 2018		100.000 %

On May 16, 2016, using part of the cash generated from the QHC spin-off, the Company completed a cash tender offer for $900 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of the 2018 Senior Secured Notes.

5¹⁄₈% Senior Secured Notes due 2021

On January 27, 2014, CHS issued $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 5¹⁄₈% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (the “2021 Senior Secured Notes”) in connection with the HMA merger, which were issued in a private placement. The net proceeds from this issuance were used to finance the HMA merger. The 2021 Senior Secured Notes bear interest at 5.125% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on February 1 and August 1, commencing August 1, 2014. Interest on the 2021 Senior Secured Notes accrues from the date of original issuance. Interest is calculated on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months. The 2021 Senior Secured Notes are secured by a first-priority lien, subject to a shared lien of equal priority with certain other obligations, including obligations under the Credit Facility and the 2018 Senior Secured Notes, and subject to prior ranking liens permitted by the indenture governing the 2021 Senior Secured Notes, on substantially the same assets, subject to certain exceptions, that secure CHS’ obligations under the Credit Facility and the 2018 Senior Secured Notes.

CHS is entitled, at its option, to redeem all or a portion of the 2021 Senior Secured Notes upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ notice, at the following redemption prices (expressed as a percentage of principal amount on the redemption date), plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date (subject to the right of holders of record on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date), if redeemed during the periods set forth below:


Period	Redemption Price
February 1, 2017 to January 31, 2018		103.844 %
February 1, 2018 to January 31, 2019		102.563 %
February 1, 2019 to January 31, 2020		101.281 %
February 1, 2020 to January 31, 2021		100.000 %

Pursuant to a registration rights agreement entered into at the time of the issuance of the 2021 Senior Secured Notes, as a result of an exchange offer made by CHS, all of the 2021 Senior Secured Notes issued in January

133

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

2014 were exchanged in October 2014 for new notes (the “2021 Exchange Notes”) having terms substantially identical in all material respects to the 2021 Senior Secured Notes (except that the exchange notes were issued under a registration statement pursuant to the 1933 Act). References to the 2021 Senior Secured Notes shall be deemed to be the 2021 Exchange Notes unless the context provides otherwise.

6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes due 2022

On January 27, 2014, CHS issued $3.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes”) in connection with the HMA merger, which were issued in a private placement. The net proceeds from this issuance were used to finance the HMA merger. The 6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes bear interest at 6.875% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on February 1 and August 1, commencing August 1, 2014. Interest on the 6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes accrues from the date of original issuance. Interest is calculated on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months.

Prior to February 1, 2018, CHS may redeem some or all of the 6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, plus a “make-whole” premium, as described in the indenture governing the 6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes. After February 1, 2018, CHS is entitled, at its option, to redeem all or a portion of the 6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ notice, at the following redemption prices (expressed as a percentage of principal amount on the redemption date), plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date (subject to the right of holders of record on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date), if redeemed during the periods set forth below:


Period	Redemption Price
February 1, 2018 to January 31, 2019		103.438 %
February 1, 2019 to January 31, 2020		101.719 %
February 1, 2020 to January 31, 2022		100.000 %

Pursuant to a registration rights agreement entered into at the time of the issuance of the 6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes, as a result of an exchange offer made by CHS, all of the 6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes issued in January 2014 were exchanged in October 2014 for new notes (the “6⁷⁄₈% Exchange Notes”) having terms substantially identical in all material respects to the 6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes (except that the exchange notes were issued under a registration statement pursuant to the 1933 Act). References to the 6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes shall be deemed to be the 6⁷⁄₈% Exchange Notes unless the context provides otherwise.

Receivables Facility

On March 21, 2012, through certain of its subsidiaries, CHS entered into an accounts receivable loan agreement (the “Receivables Facility”) with a group of lenders and banks, Credit Agricolé Corporate and Investment Bank, as a managing agent and as the administrative agent, and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as a managing agent. On March 7, 2013, CHS and certain of its subsidiaries amended the Receivables Facility to add an additional managing agent, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., to increase the size of the facility from $300 million to $500 million and to extend the scheduled termination date. Additional subsidiaries also agreed to participate in the Receivables Facility as of that date. On March 31, 2014, CHS and certain of its subsidiaries amended the Receivables Facility to increase the size of the facility from $500 million to $700 million and to extend the scheduled termination date. Additional subsidiaries also agreed to participate in the Receivables Facility as of that date. On November 13, 2015, CHS and certain of its subsidiaries amended the Receivables Facility to extend the scheduled termination date and amend certain other provisions thereof. On November 18, 2016, CHS and certain of its subsidiaries amended the Receivables Facility to extend the scheduled termination date in respect of a $450 million portion of the commitments thereunder and amend certain other provisions

134

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

thereof. The existing and future non-self pay patient-related accounts receivable (the “Receivables”) for certain affiliated hospitals serve as collateral for the outstanding borrowings under the Receivables Facility. The interest rate on the borrowings is based on the commercial paper rate plus an applicable interest rate spread. Unless earlier terminated or subsequently extended pursuant to its terms, the Receivables Facility will expire on November 13, 2018 in respect of a $450 million portion of the commitments thereunder and November 13, 2017 in respect of the remaining $250 million of commitments thereunder, subject to customary termination events that could cause an early termination date. CHS maintains effective control over the Receivables because, pursuant to the terms of the Receivables Facility, the Receivables are sold from certain of CHS’ subsidiaries to CHS, and CHS then sells or contributes the Receivables to a special-purpose entity that is wholly-owned by CHS. The wholly-owned special-purpose entity in turn grants security interests in the Receivables in exchange for borrowings obtained from the group of third-party lenders and banks of up to $700 million outstanding from time to time based on the availability of eligible Receivables and other customary factors. The wholly-owned special-purpose entity is not a subsidiary guarantor under the Credit Facility or CHS’ outstanding notes. The group of third-party lenders and banks do not have recourse to CHS or its subsidiaries beyond the assets of the wholly-owned special-purpose entity that collateralizes the loan. The Receivables and other assets of the wholly-owned special-purpose entity will be available first and foremost to satisfy the claims of the creditors of such entity. The outstanding borrowings pursuant to the Receivables Facility at December 31, 2016 totaled $677 million with approximately $435 million classified as long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet. At December 31, 2016, the carrying amount of Receivables included in the Receivables Facility totaled approximately $1.7 billion and is included in patient accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheet.

Loss from Early Extinguishment of Debt

The financing and repayment transactions discussed above resulted in a loss from the early extinguishment of debt of $30 million, $16 million and $73 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and an after-tax loss of $19 million, $10 million and $45 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Other Debt

As of December 31, 2016, other debt consisted primarily of the mortgage obligation on the Company’s corporate headquarters and other obligations maturing in various installments through 2021.

To limit the effect of changes in interest rates on a portion of the Company’s long-term borrowings, the Company is a party to 10 separate interest swap agreements in effect at December 31, 2016, with an aggregate notional amount for currently effective swaps of $2.6 billion. On each of these swaps, the Company receives a variable rate of interest based on the three-month LIBOR in exchange for the payment of a fixed rate of interest. The Company currently pays, on a quarterly basis, interest on the Revolving Facility and the Term A Facility at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 2.75%. Loans in respect of the Term F Facility accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.25%. The Term G Loan and Term H Loan accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 2.75% and 3.00%, in the case of LIBOR borrowings, respectively, and Alternate Base Rate plus 1.75% and 2.00%, respectively, in the case of Alternate Base Rate Borrowings. The Term G Loan and the Term H Loan are subject to a 1.00% LIBOR floor and a 2.00% Alternate Base Rate floor. See Note 8 for additional information regarding these swaps.

135

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

As of December 31, 2016, the scheduled maturities of long-term debt outstanding, including capital lease obligations for each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in millions):


Year	Amount
2017	$	455
2018		3,054
2019		3,641
2020		1,240
2021		3,790
Thereafter		3,257

Total maturities		15,437
Less: Deferred debt issuance costs		(204	)
Plus unamortized note premium		11

Total long-term debt	$	15,244

The Company paid interest of $930 million, $925 million and $831 million on borrowings during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

8. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The fair value of financial instruments has been estimated by the Company using available market information as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and valuation methodologies considered appropriate. The estimates presented in the table below are not necessarily indicative of amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange (in millions):


	December 31, 2016				December 31, 2015
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	238	$	238	$	184	$	184
Available-for-sale securities		299		299		271		271
Trading securities		80		80		61		61
Liabilities:
Contingent Value Right		1		1		2		2
Credit Facility		6,456		6,370		7,114		7,115
8% Senior Notes		1,920		1,615		1,992		2,018
7¹⁄₈% Senior Notes		1,189		917		1,186		1,193
5¹⁄₈% Senior Secured Notes due 2018		698		690		1,587		1,610
5¹⁄₈% Senior Secured Notes due 2021		972		930		967		997
6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes		2,932		2,102		2,921		2,858
Receivables Facility and other debt		749		749		791		791

The estimated fair value is determined using the methodologies discussed below in accordance with accounting standards related to the determination of fair value based on the U.S. GAAP fair value hierarchy as discussed in Note 9. The estimated fair value for financial instruments with a fair value that does not equal its

136

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

carrying value is considered a Level 1 valuation. The Company utilizes the market approach and obtains indicative pricing from the administrative agent to the Credit Facility to determine fair values or through publicly available subscription services such as Bloomberg where relevant.

Cash and cash equivalents. The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments (less than three months).

Available-for-sale securities. Estimated fair value is based on closing price as quoted in public markets or other various valuation techniques.

Trading securities. Estimated fair value is based on closing price as quoted in public markets.

Contingent Value Right. Estimated fair value is based on the closing price as quoted on the public market where the CVR is traded.

Credit Facility. Estimated fair value is based on publicly available trading activity and supported with information from the Company’s bankers regarding relevant pricing for trading activity among the Company’s lending institutions.

8% Senior Notes. Estimated fair value is based on the closing market price for these notes.

7¹⁄₈% Senior Notes. Estimated fair value is based on the closing market price for these notes.

5¹⁄₈% Senior Secured Notes due 2018. Estimated fair value is based on the closing market price for these notes.

5¹⁄₈% Senior Secured Notes due 2021. Estimated fair value is based on the closing market price for these notes.

6⁷⁄₈% Senior Notes. Estimated fair value is based on the closing market price for these notes.

Receivables Facility and other debt. The carrying amount of the Receivables Facility and all other debt approximates fair value due to the nature of these obligations.

Interest rate swaps. The fair value of interest rate swap agreements is the amount at which they could be settled, based on estimates calculated by the Company using a discounted cash flow analysis based on observable market inputs and validated by comparison to estimates obtained from the counterparty. The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments (“CVAs”) to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance or credit risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance or credit risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its interest rate swap agreements for the effect of nonperformance or credit risk, the Company has considered the impact of any netting features included in the agreements.

The Company assesses the effectiveness of its hedge instruments on a quarterly basis. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company completed an assessment of the cash flow hedge instruments and determined the hedges to be highly effective. The Company has also determined that the ineffective portion of the hedges do not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, operations or cash flows. The counterparties to the interest rate swap agreements expose the Company to credit risk in the event of nonperformance. However, at December 31, 2016, all of the swap agreements entered into by the Company were in a net liability position such that the Company would be required to make the net settlement payments to the counterparties; the Company does not anticipate nonperformance by those counterparties. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

137

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Interest rate swaps consisted of the following at December 31, 2016:


Swap #	Notional Amount (in millions)		Fixed Interest Rate		Termination Date	Fair Value (in millions)
1	$	200		2.055 %	July 25, 2019	$	3
2		200		2.059 %	July 25, 2019		2
3		400		1.882 %	August 30, 2019		3
4		200		2.515 %	August 30, 2019		5
5		200		2.613 %	August 30, 2019		5
6		300		2.041 %	August 30, 2020		2
7		300		2.738 %	August 30, 2020		9
8		300		2.892 %	August 30, 2020		11
9		300		2.363 %	January 27, 2021		5
10		200		2.368 %	January 27, 2021		4

The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The risk managed by using derivative instruments is interest rate risk. Interest rate swaps are entered into to manage interest rate fluctuation risk associated with the term loans in the Credit Facility. Companies are required to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the consolidated statement of financial position. The Company designates its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transactions affect earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings.

Assuming no change in December 31, 2016 interest rates, approximately $35 million of interest expense resulting from the spread between the fixed and floating rates defined in each interest rate swap agreement will be recognized during the next 12 months. If interest rate swaps do not remain highly effective as a cash flow hedge, the derivatives’ gains or losses resulting from the change in fair value reported through OCI will be reclassified into earnings.

The following tabular disclosure provides the amount of pre-tax loss recognized as a component of OCI during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (in millions):


	Amount of Pre-Tax Loss Recognized in OCI (Effective Portion)
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Interest rate swaps	$	(27	)	$	(51	)	$	(41	)

138

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The following tabular disclosure provides the location of the effective portion of the pre-tax loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss (“AOCL”) into interest expense on the consolidated statements of (loss) income during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (in millions):


Location of Loss Reclassified from AOCL into Income (Effective Portion)	Amount of Pre-Tax Loss Reclassified from AOCL into Income (Effective Portion)
	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2015		2014
Interest expense, net	$	54	$	42	$	61

The fair values of derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were as follows (in millions):

Asset Derivatives

Liability Derivatives

December 31, 2016

December 31, 2015

December 31, 2016

December 31, 2015

Balance
Sheet
Location

Fair Value

Balance
Sheet
Location

Fair Value

Balance
Sheet
Location

Fair Value

Balance
Sheet
Location

Fair Value

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

Other
assets,
net

Other
long-
term
liabilities

9. FAIR VALUE

Fair Value Hierarchy

Fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the Company utilizes the U.S. GAAP fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumption about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).

The inputs used to measure fair value are classified into the following fair value hierarchy:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 includes values determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques reflecting the Company’s own assumptions.

In instances where the determination of the fair value hierarchy measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its

139

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment of factors specific to the asset or liability. Transfers between levels within the fair value hierarchy are recognized by the Company on the date of the change in circumstances that requires such transfer. There were no transfers between levels during the years ending December 31, 2016 or December 31, 2015.

The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in millions):


	December 31, 2016		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Available-for-sale securities	$	299	$	163	$	136	$	-
Trading securities		80		80		-		-

Total assets	$	379	$	243	$	136	$	-


Contingent Value Right (CVR)	$	1	$	1	$	-	$	-
CVR-related liability		252		-		-		252
Fair value of interest rate swap agreements		49		-		49		-

Total liabilities	$	302	$	1	$	49	$	252


	December 31, 2015		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Available-for-sale securities	$	271	$	155	$	116	$	-
Trading securities		61		61		-		-

Total assets	$	332	$	216	$	116	$	-


Contingent Value Right (CVR)	$	2	$	2	$	-	$	-
CVR-related liability		261		-		-		261
Fair value of interest rate swap agreements		76		-		76		-

Total liabilities	$	339	$	2	$	76	$	261

Available-for-sale securities and trading securities classified as Level 1 are measured using quoted market prices. Level 2 available-for-sale securities primarily consisted of bonds and notes issued by the United States government and its agencies and domestic and foreign corporations. The estimated fair values of these securities are determined using various valuation techniques, including a multi-dimensional relational model that incorporates standard observable inputs and assumptions such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids/offers and other pertinent reference data.

140

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Available-for-sale Securities

Supplemental information regarding the Company’s available-for-sale securities (all of which had no withdrawal restrictions) is set forth in the table below (in millions):


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Values
As of December 31, 2016:
Debt securities and debt-based mutual funds
Government and corporate	$	232	$	-	$	(9	)	$	223
Equity securities and equity-based mutual funds
Domestic		67		3		-			70
International		6		-		-			6

Totals	$	305	$	3	$	(9	)	$	299


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Values
As of December 31, 2015:
Debt securities and debt-based mutual funds
Government and corporate	$	161	$	1	$	(6	)	$	156
Equity securities and equity-based mutual funds
Domestic		79		15		(1	)		93
International		21		1		-			22

Totals	$	261	$	17	$	(7	)	$	271

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, investments with aggregate estimated fair values of approximately $232 million (226 investments) and $119 million (329 investments), respectively, generated the gross unrealized losses disclosed in the above table. At each reporting date, the Company performs an evaluation of impaired securities to determine if the unrealized losses are other-than-temporary. This evaluation considers a number of factors including, but not limited to, the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, and management’s ability and intent to hold the securities until fair value recovers. Based on the results of this evaluation, management concluded that as of December 31, 2016, there are approximately $2 million of other-than-temporary losses related to available-for-sale securities. The recent declines in value of the remaining securities and/or length of time they have been below cost, as well as the Company’s ability and intent to hold the securities for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a projected recovery of fair value, have caused management to conclude that the remaining securities, that have generated gross unrealized losses, were not other-than-temporarily impaired. Management will continue to monitor and evaluate the recoverability of the Company’s available-for-sale securities.

141

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The contractual maturities of debt-based securities held by the Company as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, excluding mutual fund holdings, are set forth in the table below (in millions). Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the debt securities may have the right to prepay their obligations without prepayment penalties.


	December 31, 2016				December 31, 2015
	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Values		Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Values
Within 1 year	$	2	$	2	$	1	$	1
After 1 year and through year 5		40		40		12		12
After 5 years and through year 10		42		40		11		11
After 10 years		57		54		22		22

Gross realized gains and losses on sales of available-for-sale securities and other investment income, which includes interest and dividends, are summarized in the table below (in millions):


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Realized gains	$	28		$	8		$	13
Realized losses		(6	)		(6	)		(3	)
Investment income		7			8			8

Contingent Value Right (CVR)

The CVR represents the estimate of the fair value for the contingent consideration paid to HMA shareholders as part of the HMA merger. The CVR is listed on the NASDAQ and the valuation at December 31, 2016 is based on the quoted trading price for the CVR on the last day of the period. Changes in the estimated fair value of the CVR are recorded through the consolidated statements of (loss) income.

CVR-related Liability

The CVR-related legal liability represents the Company’s estimate of fair value at December 31, 2016 of the liability associated with the legal matters assumed in the HMA merger, which are included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. This liability did not include those matters previously accrued by HMA as a probable contingency, which were settled and paid during the year ended December 31, 2015. To develop the estimate of fair value, the Company engaged an independent third-party valuation firm to measure the liability. The valuation was made utilizing the Company’s estimates of future outcomes for each legal case and simulating future outcomes based on the timing, probability and distribution of several scenarios using a Monte Carlo simulation model. Other inputs were then utilized for discounting the liability to the measurement date. The HMA legal matters underlying this fair value estimate were evaluated by management to determine the likelihood and impact of each of the potential outcomes. Using that information, as well as the potential correlation and variability associated with each case, a fair value was determined for the estimated future cash outflows to conclude or settle the HMA legal matters included in the analysis, excluding legal fees (which are expensed as incurred). Because of the unobservable nature of the majority of the inputs used to value the liability, the Company has classified the fair value measurement as a Level 3 measurement in the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value of the CVR-related legal liability will be measured each reporting period using similar measurement techniques, updated for the assumptions and facts existing at that date for each of the underlying legal matters. Changes in the fair value of the CVR related legal liability are recorded in future periods through the consolidated statements of (loss) income.

142

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Fair Value of Interest Rate Swap Agreements

The valuation of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements is determined using market valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each agreement. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the agreement, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including forward interest rate curves. The fair value of interest rate swap agreements are determined by netting the discounted future fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based on the expectation of future interest rates based on observable market forward interest rate curves and the notional amount being hedged.

The Company incorporates CVAs to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance or credit risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance or credit risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its interest rate swap agreements for the effect of nonperformance or credit risk, the Company has considered the impact of any netting features included in the agreements. The CVA on the Company’s interest rate swap agreements resulted in a decrease in the fair value of the related liability of $3 million and an after-tax adjustment of $2 million to OCI at December 31, 2016. The CVA on the Company’s interest rate swap agreements resulted in a decrease in the fair value of the related liability of $4 million and an after-tax adjustment of $2 million to OCI at December 31, 2015.

The majority of the inputs used to value the Company’s interest rate swap agreements, including the forward interest rate curves and market perceptions of the Company’s credit risk used in the CVAs, are observable inputs available to a market participant. As a result, the Company has determined that the interest rate swap valuations are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

10. LEASES

The Company leases hospitals, medical office buildings, and certain equipment under capital and operating lease agreements. During 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company entered into capital lease obligations of $179 million, $50 million and $18 million, respectively. All lease agreements generally require the Company to pay maintenance, repairs, property taxes and insurance costs.

Commitments relating to noncancellable operating and capital leases for each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in millions):


Year Ending December 31,	Operating (1)		Capital
2017	$	269	$	43
2018		207		32
2019		156		27
2020		118		22
2021		81		22
Thereafter		246		315

Total minimum future payments	$	1,077		461

Less: Imputed interest				(133	)

Total capital lease obligations				328
Less: Current portion				(26	)

Long-term capital lease obligations			$	302

(1)	Minimum lease payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals due in the future of $15 million.

143

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

On December 22, 2016, the Company completed the sale and leaseback of ten medical office buildings for net proceeds of $159 million to HCP, Inc. The buildings, with a combined total of 756,183 square feet, are located in five states and support a wide array of diagnostic, medical and surgical services in an outpatient setting for the respective nearby hospitals. Because of the Company’s continuing involvement in these leased buildings, the transaction does not qualify for sale treatment and the related leases have been recorded as financing obligations in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016. Such financing obligations are included with the capital lease obligations discussed throughout these footnotes to the consolidated financial statements.

Assets capitalized under capital leases as reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets were $69 million of land and improvements, $826 million of buildings and improvements and $56 million of equipment and fixtures as of December 31, 2016 and $74 million of land and improvements, $793 million of buildings and improvements and $112 million of equipment and fixtures as of December 31, 2015. The accumulated depreciation related to assets under capital leases was $240 million and $246 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Depreciation of assets under capital leases is included in depreciation and amortization expense and amortization of debt discounts on capital lease obligations is included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of (loss) income.

11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company maintains various benefit plans, including defined contribution plans, defined benefit plans and deferred compensation plans, for which certain of the Company’s subsidiaries are the plan sponsors. The CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan is a defined contribution plan which covers the majority of the employees at subsidiaries owned prior to the HMA merger. Employees at these locations whose employment is covered by collective bargaining agreements are generally eligible to participate in the CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. Standard 401(k) Plan. The Company also maintains the Health Management Associates, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan, a defined contribution plan covering substantially all of the employees formerly employed by HMA. Total expense to the Company under the 401(k) plans was $98 million, $103 million and $99 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and is recorded in salaries and benefits expense on the consolidated statements of (loss) income.

The Company maintains unfunded deferred compensation plans that allow participants to defer receipt of a portion of their compensation. The liability for the deferred compensation plans was $229 million and $199 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and is included in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company had assets of $219 million and $197 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, in a non-qualified plan trust generally designated to pay benefits of the deferred compensation plans, consisting of trading securities of $80 million and $61 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and company-owned life insurance contracts of $139 million and $136 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The Company provides an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) for certain members of its executive management. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for the benefit obligations and a January 1 measurement date for its net periodic costs for the SERP. Variances from actuarially assumed rates will result in increases or decreases in benefit obligations and net periodic cost in future periods. Benefits expense under the SERP was $12 million, $12 million and $11 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The accrued benefit liability for the SERP totaled $122 million and $131 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and is included in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The weighted-average assumptions used in determining net periodic cost for the year ended December 31, 2016 was a discount rate of 3.6% and annual salary increase of 3.0%. The Company had available-for-sale securities in a rabbi trust generally designated to pay benefits of the SERP in the amounts of $131 million and $95 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These amounts are included in other assets, net on the consolidated balance sheets.

144

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The Company maintains the CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. Retirement Income Plan (“Pension Plan”), which is a defined benefit, non-contributory pension plan that covers certain employees at three of its hospitals. The Pension Plan provides benefits to covered individuals satisfying certain age and service requirements. Employer contributions to the Pension Plan are in accordance with the minimum funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. The Company expects to make no contribution to the Pension Plan in 2017. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for the benefit obligations and a January 1 measurement date for its net periodic costs for the Pension Plan. Variances from actuarially assumed rates will result in increases or decreases in benefit obligations, net periodic cost and funding requirements in future periods. Benefits expense under the Pension Plan was less than $1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. The accrued benefit liability for the Pension Plan totaled $16 million and $13 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and is included in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The weighted-average assumptions used for determining the net periodic cost for the year ended December 31, 2016 was a discount rate of 4.5% and the expected long-term rate of return on assets of 7.0%.

12. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Authorized capital shares of the Company include 400,000,000 shares of capital stock consisting of 300,000,000 shares of common stock and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Each of the aforementioned classes of capital stock has a par value of $0.01 per share. Shares of preferred stock, none of which were outstanding as of December 31, 2016, may be issued in one or more series having such rights, preferences and other provisions as determined by the Board of Directors without approval by the holders of common stock.

On November 6, 2015, the Company adopted an open market repurchase program for up to 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, not to exceed $300 million in repurchases. The repurchase program will expire on the earlier of November 5, 2018, when the maximum number of shares has been repurchased, or when the maximum dollar amount has been expended. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company repurchased and retired 532,188 shares at a weighted-average price of $27.31 per share, which is the cumulative number of shares repurchased and retired under this program. No shares were repurchased under this program during the year ended December 31, 2016.

On December 10, 2014, the Company adopted an open market repurchase program for up to 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, not to exceed $150 million in repurchases. This repurchase program expired on December 1, 2015 after the Company repurchased and retired the maximum 5,000,000 shares at a weighted average price of $28.84 per share during the three months ended December 31, 2015.

On December 14, 2011, the Company adopted an open market repurchase program for up to 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, not to exceed $100 million in repurchases. This repurchase program expired on December 13, 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company repurchased and retired 175,000 shares at a weighted-average price of $49.72 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company repurchased and retired 706,023 shares at a weighted-average price of $38.39 per share. The cumulative number of shares repurchased and retired under this program was 881,023 shares at a weighted-average price of $40.64 per share.

The Company is a holding company which operates through its subsidiaries. The Company’s Credit Facility and the indentures governing the senior and senior secured notes contain various covenants under which the assets of the subsidiaries of the Company are subject to certain restrictions relating to, among other matters, dividends and distributions, as referenced in the paragraph below.

With the exception of a special cash dividend of $0.25 per share paid by the Company in December 2012, historically, the Company has not paid any cash dividends. Subject to certain exceptions, the Company’s Credit Facility limits the ability of the Company’s subsidiaries to pay dividends and make distributions to the Company,

145

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

and limits the Company’s ability to pay dividends and/or repurchase stock, to an amount not to exceed $200 million in the aggregate plus an additional $25 million in any particular year plus the aggregate amount of proceeds from the exercise of stock options. The indentures governing the senior and senior secured notes also restrict the Company’s subsidiaries from, among other matters, paying dividends and making distributions to the Company, which thereby limits the Company’s ability to pay dividends and/or repurchase stock. The non-cash dividend of approximately $713 million recorded by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2016 to reflect the distribution of the net assets of QHC was a permitted transaction under the Company’s Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2016, under the most restrictive test under these agreements (and subject to certain exceptions), the Company has approximately $318 million remaining available with which to pay permitted dividends and/or repurchase shares of stock or its senior and senior secured notes.

The following schedule discloses the effects of changes in the Company’s ownership interest in its less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries on Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders’ equity (in millions):


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Net (loss) income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders	$	(1,721	)	$	158		$	92
Transfers from the noncontrolling interests:
Net decrease in Community Health Systems, Inc.paid-in-capital for purchase of subsidiary partnership interests		(9	)		(16	)		(2	)

Net transfers from the noncontrolling interests		(9	)		(16	)		(2	)

Change to Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders’ equity from net (loss) income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders and transfers to noncontrolling interests	$	(1,730	)	$	142		$	90

146

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

13. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the components of the numerator and denominator for the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for (loss) income from continuing operations, discontinued operations and net (loss) income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. common stockholders (in millions, except share data):


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Numerator:
(Loss) income from continuing operations, net of taxes	$	(1,611	)	$	295		$	260
Less: Income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of taxes		95			101			111

(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. common stockholders — basic and diluted	$	(1,706	)	$	194		$	149


Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes	$	(15	)	$	(36	)	$	(57	)
Less: Loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of taxes		-			-			-

Loss from discontinued operations attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. common stockholders — basic and diluted	$	(15	)	$	(36	)	$	(57	)


Denominator:
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding — basic		110,730,971			114,454,674			111,579,088
Effect of dilutive securities:
Restricted stock awards		-			449,961			377,190
Employee stock options		-			357,188			578,395
Other equity-based awards		-			10,581			14,647

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding — diluted		110,730,971			115,272,404			112,549,320

The Company generated a loss from continuing operations attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2016, so the effect of dilutive securities is not considered because their effect would be antidilutive. If the Company had generated income from continuing operations during the year ended December 31, 2016, the effect of restricted stock awards, employee stock options, and other equity-based awards on the diluted shares calculation would have been an increase in shares of 331,518 shares.

Year Ended December 31,

2016

2015

2014

Dilutive securities outstanding not included in the computation of earnings per share because their effect is antidilutive:

Employee stock options and restricted stock awards

2,554,627

255,564

472,570

147

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

14. EQUITY INVESTMENTS

As of December 31, 2016, the Company owned equity interests of 38.0% in three hospitals in Macon, Georgia, in which HCA Holdings, Inc. (“HCA”) owns the majority interest. On April 29, 2016, the Company sold its unconsolidated minority equity interests in Valley Health System, LLC, a joint venture with Universal Health Systems, Inc. (“UHS”) representing four hospitals in Las Vegas, Nevada, in which the Company owned a 27.5% interest, and in Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC, a joint venture with UHS representing one hospital in Las Vegas, Nevada, in which the Company owned a 26.1% interest. The Company received $403 million in cash in return for the sale of its equity interests and, as a result, recognized a gain of approximately $94 million on the sale of investments in unconsolidated affiliates during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Summarized combined financial information for these unconsolidated entities in the periods in which the Company owned these equity interests is as follows (in millions):


	December 31,
	2016		2015
Current assets	$	54	$	283
Noncurrent assets		112		838

Total assets	$	166	$	1,121


Current liabilities	$	17	$	111
Noncurrent liabilities		2		2
Members’ equity		147		1,008

Total liabilities and equity	$	166	$	1,121


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2015		2014
Revenues	$	731	$	1,494	$	1,368
Operating costs and expenses		602		1,287		1,184
Income from continuing operations before taxes		129		207		184

The summarized financial information was derived from the financial information provided to the Company by those unconsolidated entities.

In March 2005, the Company began purchasing items, primarily medical supplies, medical equipment and pharmaceuticals, under an agreement with HealthTrust Purchasing Group, L.P. (“HealthTrust”), a group purchasing organization in which the Company is a noncontrolling partner. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had a 23.1% ownership interest in HealthTrust.

On December 31, 2016, the Company sold 80% of its ownership interest in the legal entity that owned and operated its home care agency business. As part of the divestiture of its controlling interest in the home care agency business, the Company recorded an equity method investment representing its remaining 20% ownership at a fair value of $32 million.

The Company’s investment in all of its unconsolidated affiliates was $177 million and $479 million at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and is included in other assets, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Included in the Company’s results of operations is the Company’s equity in pre-tax earnings from all of its investments in unconsolidated affiliates, which was $43 million, $63 million and $48 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

148

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

15. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company operates in two distinct operating segments, represented by hospital operations (which includes its general acute care hospitals and related healthcare entities that provide inpatient and outpatient healthcare services) and home care agency operations (which provide in-home outpatient care).

Only the hospital operations segment meets the criteria as a separate reportable segment. The financial information for the home care agency segment does not meet the quantitative thresholds for a separate identifiable reportable segment and is combined into the corporate and all other reportable segment. On December 31, 2016, the Company sold 80% of its ownership interest in the home care division.

The distribution between reportable segments of the Company’s net operating revenues and (loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes, expenditures for segment assets and total assets is summarized in the following tables (in millions):


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Net operating revenues:
Hospital operations	$	18,210		$	19,234		$	18,399
Corporate and all other		228			203			240

Total	$	18,438		$	19,437		$	18,639


(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes:
Hospital operations	$	(1,418	)	$	767		$	772
Corporate and all other		(297	)		(356	)		(430	)

Total	$	(1,715	)	$	411		$	342


Expenditures for segment assets:
Hospital operations	$	727		$	915		$	817
Corporate and all other		17			38			36

Total	$	744		$	953		$	853


	December 31,
	2016			2015
Total assets:
Hospital operations	$	20,582		$	25,005
Corporate and all other		1,362			1,590

Total	$	21,944		$	26,595

149

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

16. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The following tables present information about items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income by component for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in millions, net of tax):


	Change in Fair Value of Interest Rate Swaps			Change in Fair Value of Available for Sale Securities			Change in Unrecognized Pension Cost Components			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance as of December 31, 2015	$	(48	)	$	1		$	(26	)	$	(73	)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications		(17	)		2			1			(14	)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		34			(13	)		2			23

Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income		17			(11	)		3			9
AOCI distributed to QHC in spin-off		-			-			2			2

Balance as of December 31, 2016	$	(31	)	$	(10	)	$	(21	)	$	(62	)


	Change in Fair Value of Interest Rate Swaps			Change in Fair Value of Available for Sale Securities			Change in Unrecognized Pension Cost Components			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance as of December 31, 2014	$	(43	)	$	7		$	(27	)	$	(63	)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications		(32	)		(6	)		(1	)		(39	)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		27			-			2			29

Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income		(5	)		(6	)		1			(10	)

Balance as of December 31, 2015	$	(48	)	$	1		$	(26	)	$	(73	)

150

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The following tables present a subtotal for each significant reclassification to net (loss) income out of AOCL and the line item affected in the accompanying consolidated statements of (loss) income for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in millions):


	Amount reclassified from AOCL			Affected line item in the statement where net (loss) income is presented
Details about accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components	Year Ended December 31, 2016
Gains and losses on cash flow hedges
Interest rate swaps	$	(54	)	Interest expense, net
		20		Tax benefit

	$	(34	)	Net of tax

Amortization of defined benefit pension items
Prior service costs	$	(2	)	Salaries and benefits
Actuarial losses		(1	)	Salaries and benefits

		(3	)	Total before tax
		1		Tax benefit

	$	(2	)	Net of tax


	Amount reclassified from AOCL			Affected line item in the statement where net income is presented
Details about accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components	Year Ended December 31, 2015
Gains and losses on cash flow hedges
Interest rate swaps	$	(42	)	Interest expense, net
		15		Tax benefit

	$	(27	)	Net of tax

Amortization of defined benefit pension items
Prior service costs	$	(1	)	Salaries and benefits
Actuarial losses		(2	)	Salaries and benefits

		(3	)	Total before tax
		1		Tax benefit

	$	(2	)	Net of tax

17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Construction and Other Capital Commitments. Pursuant to a hospital purchase agreement in effect as of December 31, 2016, the Company has agreed to build a replacement facility in York, Pennsylvania. The estimated construction cost, including equipment costs, is approximately $125 million. This project is required to be completed in 2017 and approximately $17 million has been expended through December 31, 2016 related to this replacement hospital. Pursuant to a hospital purchase agreement in effect as of December 31, 2016, the Company is required to build replacement facilities in La Porte and Knox, Indiana. The estimated construction costs, including equipment costs, are approximately $125 million and $15 million, respectively. No costs have

151

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

been incurred to date on those facilities. In addition, under other purchase agreements outstanding at December 31, 2016, the Company has committed to spend approximately $464 million for costs such as capital improvements, equipment, selected leases and physician recruiting. These commitments are required to be fulfilled generally over a five to seven year period after acquisition. Through December 31, 2016, the Company has spent approximately $209 million related to these commitments.

Physician Recruiting Commitments. As part of its physician recruitment strategy, the Company provides income guarantee agreements to certain physicians who agree to relocate to its communities and commit to remain in practice there. Under such agreements, the Company is required to make payments to the physicians in excess of the amounts they earned in their practice up to the amount of the income guarantee. These income guarantee periods are typically for 12 months. Such payments are recoverable by the Company from physicians who do not fulfill their commitment period, which is typically three years, to the respective community. At December 31, 2016, the maximum potential amount of future payments under these guarantees in excess of the liability recorded is $30 million.

Professional Liability Claims. As part of the Company’s business of owning and operating hospitals, it is subject to legal actions alleging liability on its part. The Company accrues for losses resulting from such liability claims, as well as loss adjustment expenses that are out-of-pocket and directly related to such liability claims. These direct out-of-pocket expenses include fees of outside counsel and experts. The Company does not accrue for costs that are part of corporate overhead, such as the costs of in-house legal and risk management departments. The losses resulting from professional liability claims primarily consist of estimates for known claims, as well as estimates for incurred but not reported claims. The estimates are based on specific claim facts, historical claim reporting and payment patterns, the nature and level of hospital operations and actuarially determined projections. The actuarially determined projections are based on the Company’s actual claim data, including historic reporting and payment patterns which have been gathered over an approximate 20-year period. As discussed below, since the Company purchases excess insurance on a claims-made basis that transfers risk to third-party insurers, the liability it accrues does include an amount for the losses covered by its excess insurance. The Company also records a receivable for the expected reimbursement of losses covered by excess insurance. Since the Company believes that the amount and timing of its future claims payments are reliably determinable, it discounts the amount accrued for losses resulting from professional liability claims using the risk-free interest rate corresponding to the timing of expected payments.

The net present value of the projected payments was discounted using a weighted-average risk-free rate of 1.8%, 1.6% and 1.7% in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. This liability is adjusted for new claims information in the period such information becomes known. The Company’s estimated liability for professional and general liability claims was $788 million and $901 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The estimated undiscounted claims liability was $843 million and $949 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The current portion of the liability for professional and general liability claims was $130 million and $156 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and is included in other accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, with the long-term portion recorded in other long-term liabilities. Professional malpractice expense includes the losses resulting from professional liability claims and loss adjustment expense, as well as paid excess insurance premiums, and is presented within other operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of (loss) income.

The Company’s processes for obtaining and analyzing claims and incident data are standardized across all of its hospitals and have been consistent for many years. The Company monitors the outcomes of the medical care services that it provides and for each reported claim, the Company obtains various information concerning the facts and circumstances related to that claim. In addition, the Company routinely monitors current key statistics and volume indicators in its assessment of utilizing historical trends. The average lag period between claim occurrence and payment of a final settlement is between four and five years, although the facts and circumstances

152

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

of individual claims could result in the timing of such payments being different from this average. Since claims are paid promptly after settlement with the claimant is reached, settled claims represent approximately 1.0% of the total liability at the end of any period.

For purposes of estimating its individual claim accruals, the Company utilizes specific claim information, including the nature of the claim, the expected claim amount, the year in which the claim occurred and the laws of the jurisdiction in which the claim occurred. Once the case accruals for known claims are determined, information is stratified by loss layers and retentions, accident years, reported years, geography and claims relating to the acquired HMA hospitals versus claims relating to the Company’s other hospitals. Several actuarial methods are used against this data to produce estimates of ultimate paid losses and reserves for incurred but not reported claims. Each of these methods uses company-specific historical claims data and other information. This company-specific data includes information regarding the Company’s business, including historical paid losses and loss adjustment expenses, historical and current case loss reserves, actual and projected hospital statistical data, a variety of hospital census information, employed physician information, professional liability retentions for each policy year, geographic information and other data.

Based on these analyses the Company determines its estimate of the professional liability claims. The determination of management’s estimate, including the preparation of the reserve analysis that supports such estimate, involves subjective judgment of the management. Changes in reserving data or the trends and factors that influence reserving data may signal fundamental shifts in the Company’s future claim development patterns or may simply reflect single-period anomalies. Even if a change reflects a fundamental shift, the full extent of the change may not become evident until years later. Moreover, since the Company’s methods and models use different types of data and the Company selects its liability from the results of all of these methods, it typically cannot quantify the precise impact of such factors on its estimates of the liability. Due to the Company’s standardized and consistent processes for handling claims and the long history and depth of company-specific data, the Company’s methodologies have produced reliably determinable estimates of ultimate paid losses.

The Company is primarily self-insured for professional liability claims; however, the Company obtains excess insurance that transfers the risk of loss to a third-party insurer for claims in excess of self-insured retentions. The Company’s excess insurance is underwritten on a claims-made basis. For claims reported prior to June 1, 2002, substantially all of the Company’s professional and general liability risks were subject to a less than $1 million per occurrence self-insured retention and for claims reported from June 1, 2002 through June 1, 2003, these self-insured retentions were $2 million per occurrence. Substantially all claims reported after June 1, 2003 and before June 1, 2005 are self-insured up to $4 million per claim. Substantially all claims reported on or after June 1, 2005 and before June 1, 2014 are self-insured up to $5 million per claim. Substantially all claims reported on or after June 1, 2014 are self-insured up to $10 million per claim. Management on occasion has selectively increased the insured risk at certain hospitals based upon insurance pricing and other factors and may continue that practice in the future. Excess insurance for all hospitals has been purchased through commercial insurance companies and generally covers the Company for liabilities in excess of the self-insured retentions. The excess coverage consists of multiple layers of insurance, the sum of which totals up to $95 million per occurrence and in the aggregate for claims reported on or after June 1, 2003, up to $145 million per occurrence and in the aggregate for claims reported on or after January 1, 2008, up to $195 million per occurrence and in the aggregate for claims reported on or after June 1, 2010, and up to $220 million per occurrence and in the aggregate for claims reported on or after June 1, 2015. In addition, for integrated occurrence malpractice claims, there is an additional $50 million of excess coverage for claims reported on or after June 1, 2014 and an additional $75 million of excess coverage for claims reported on or after June 1, 2015. For certain policy years prior to June 1, 2014, if the first aggregate layer of excess coverage becomes fully utilized, then the Company’s self-insured retention will increase to $10 million per claim for any subsequent claims in that policy year until the Company’s total aggregate coverage is met.

153

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Effective January 1, 2008, the hospitals acquired from Triad were insured on a claims-made basis as described above and through commercial insurance companies as described above for substantially all claims occurring on or after January 1, 2002 and reported on or after January 1, 2008. Substantially all losses for the former Triad hospitals in periods prior to May 1, 1999 were insured through a wholly-owned insurance subsidiary of HCA, Triad’s owner prior to that time, and excess loss policies maintained by HCA. HCA has agreed to indemnify the former Triad hospitals in respect of claims covered by such insurance policies arising prior to May 1, 1999. After May 1, 1999 through December 31, 2006, the former Triad hospitals obtained insurance coverage on a claims incurred basis from HCA’s wholly-owned insurance subsidiary, with excess coverage obtained from other carriers that is subject to certain deductibles. Effective for claims incurred after December 31, 2006, Triad began insuring its claims from $1 million to $5 million through its wholly-owned captive insurance company, replacing the coverage provided by HCA. Substantially all claims occurring during 2007 were self-insured up to $10 million per claim.

Legal Matters. The Company is a party to various legal, regulatory and governmental proceedings incidental to its business. Based on current knowledge, management does not believe that loss contingencies arising from pending legal, regulatory and governmental matters, including the matters described herein, will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or liquidity of the Company. However, in light of the inherent uncertainties involved in pending legal, regulatory and governmental matters, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, and the very large or indeterminate damages sought in some of these matters, an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters could be material to the Company’s results of operations or cash flows for any particular reporting period.

With respect to all legal, regulatory and governmental proceedings, the Company considers the likelihood of a negative outcome. If the Company determines the likelihood of a negative outcome with respect to any such matter is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company records an accrual for the estimated loss for the expected outcome of the matter. If the likelihood of a negative outcome with respect to material matters is reasonably possible and the Company is able to determine an estimate of the possible loss or a range of loss, whether in excess of a related accrued liability or where there is no accrued liability, the Company discloses the estimate of the possible loss or range of loss. However, the Company is unable to estimate a possible loss or range of loss in some instances based on the significant uncertainties involved in, and/or the preliminary nature of, certain legal, regulatory and governmental matters.

In connection with the spin-off of QHC, the Company agreed to indemnify QHC for certain liabilities relating to outcomes or events occurring prior to April 29, 2016, the closing date of the spin-off, including (i) certain claims and proceedings that were known to be outstanding at or prior to the consummation of the spin-off and involved multiple facilities and (ii) certain claims, proceedings and investigations by governmental authorities or private plaintiffs related to activities occurring at or related to QHC’s healthcare facilities prior to the closing

154

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

date of the spin-off, but only to the extent, in the case of clause (ii), that such claims are covered by insurance policies maintained by the Company, including professional liability and employer practices. In this regard, the Company continues to be responsible for HMA Legal Matters (as defined below) covered by the CVR agreement that relate to QHC’s business, and any amounts payable by the Company in connection therewith will continue to reduce the amount payable by the Company in respect of the CVRs. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company is not required to indemnify QHC in respect of any claims or proceedings arising out of or related to the business operations of Quorum Health Resources, LLC at any time or QHC’s compliance with the corporate integrity agreement. Subsequent to the spin-off of QHC, the Office of the Inspector General provided the Company with written assurance that it would look solely at QHC for compliance for its facilities under the Company’s Corporate Integrity Agreement; however, the Office of the Inspector General declined to enter into a separate corporate integrity agreement with QHC.

HMA Legal Matters and Related CVR

The CVR agreement entitles the holder to receive a one-time cash payment of up to $1.00 per CVR, subject to downward adjustment based on the final resolution of certain litigation, investigations (whether formal or informal, including subpoenas), or other actions or proceedings related to HMA or its affiliates existing on or prior to July 29, 2013 (the date of the Company’s merger agreement with HMA) as more specifically provided in the CVR agreement (all such matters are referred to as the “HMA Legal Matters”), which include, but are not limited to, investigation and litigation matters as previously disclosed by HMA in public filings with the SEC and/or as described in more detail below. The adjustment reducing the ultimate amount paid to holders of the CVR is determined based on the amount of losses incurred by the Company in connection with the HMA Legal Matters as more specifically provided in the CVR agreement, which generally includes the amount paid for damages, costs, fees and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees and expenses), and all fines, penalties, settlement amounts, indemnification obligations and other liabilities (all such losses are referred to as “HMA Losses”). If the aggregate amount of HMA Losses exceeds a deductible of $18 million, then the amount payable in respect of each CVR shall be reduced (but not below zero) by an amount equal to the quotient obtained by dividing: (a) the product of (i) all losses in excess of the deductible and (ii) 90%; by (b) the number of CVRs outstanding on the date on which final resolution of the existing litigation occurs. There are 264,544,053 CVRs outstanding as of the date hereof. If total HMA Losses (including HMA Losses that have occurred to date as noted in the table below) exceed approximately $312 million, then the holders of the CVRs will not be entitled to any payment in respect of the CVRs.

The CVRs do not have a finite payment date. Any payments the Company makes under the CVR agreement will be payable within 60 days after the final resolution of the HMA Legal Matters. The CVRs are unsecured obligations of CHS and all payments under the CVRs will be subordinated in right of payment to the prior payment in full of all of the Company’s senior obligations (as defined in the CVR agreement), which include outstanding indebtedness of the Company (subject to certain exceptions set forth in the CVR agreement) and the HMA Losses. The CVR agreement permits the Company to acquire all or some of the CVRs, whether in open market transactions, private transactions or otherwise. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had acquired no CVRs.

155

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The following table represents the impact of legal expenses paid or incurred and settlements paid or deemed final as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 on the amounts owed to CVR holders (in millions):


			Allocation of Expenses and Settlements Paid
	Total Expenses and Settlement Cost		Deductible		CHS Responsibility at 10%		Reduction to Amount Owed to CVR Holders at 90%
As of December 31, 2014	$	24	$	18	$	-	$	6
Settlements paid		26		-		3		23
Legal expenses incurred and/or paid during the year ended December 31, 2015		8		-		1		7

As of December 31, 2015	$	58	$	18	$	4	$	36
Settlements paid		1		-		-		1
Legal expenses incurred and/or paid during the year ended December 31, 2016		3		-		-		3

As of December 31, 2016	$	62	$	18	$	4	$	40

Amounts owed to CVR holders are dependent on the ultimate resolution of the HMA Legal Matters and determination of HMA Losses incurred. The settlement of any or all of the claims and expenses incurred on behalf of the Company in defending itself will (subject to the deductible) reduce the amounts owed to the CVR holders.

Underlying the CVR agreement are a number of claims included in the HMA Legal Matters asserted against HMA. The Company has recorded a liability in connection with those claims as part of the acquired assets and liabilities at the date of acquisition pursuant to the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805 “Business Combinations.” For the estimate of the Company’s liabilities associated with the HMA Legal Matters that will be covered by the CVR and were not previously accrued by HMA, the Company recorded a liability of $284 million as part of the acquisition accounting for the HMA merger based on the Company’s estimate of fair value of such liabilities as of the date of acquisition. There was a $9 million decrease in the liability during the year ended December 31, 2016 and the fair value of such liabilities of $252 million as of December 31, 2016 is recorded in other long-term liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2016, there is currently no accrual recorded for the probable contingency claims underlying the CVR agreement. The estimated liability for probable contingency claims underlying the CVR agreement that was previously recorded by HMA, and reflected in the purchase accounting for HMA as an acquired liability has been settled and was paid during the year ended December 31, 2015. In addition, although legal fees are not included in the amounts currently accrued, such legal fees are taken into account in determining HMA Losses under the CVR agreement. Certain significant HMA Legal Matters underlying these liabilities are discussed in greater detail below.

HMA Matters Recorded at Fair Value

Medicare/Medicaid Billing Lawsuits

Beginning during the week of December 16, 2013, eleven qui tam lawsuits filed by private individuals against HMA were unsealed in various United States district courts. The United States has elected to intervene in all or part of eight of these matters; namely U.S. ex rel. Craig Brummer v. Health Management Associates, Inc. et al. (Middle District Georgia) (“Brummer”); U.S. ex rel. Ralph D. Williams v. Health Management Associates, Inc. et al. (Middle District Georgia) (“Williams”); U.S. ex rel. Scott H. Plantz, M.D. et al. v. Health Management Associates,

156

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Inc., et al. (Northern District Illinois) (“Plantz”); U.S. ex rel. Thomas L. Mason, M.D. et al. v. Health Management Associates, Inc. et al. (Western District North Carolina) (“Mason”); U.S. ex rel. Jacqueline Meyer, et al. v. Health Management Associates, Inc., Gary Newsome et al. (“Jacqueline Meyer”) (District of South Carolina); U.S. ex rel. George Miller, et al. v. Health Management Associates, Inc. (Eastern District of Pennsylvania) (“Miller”); U.S. ex rel. Bradley Nurkin v. Health Management Associates, Inc. et al. (Middle District of Florida) (“Nurkin”); and U.S. ex rel. Paul Meyer v. Health Management Associates, Inc. et al. (Southern District Florida) (“Paul Meyer”). The United States has elected to intervene with respect to allegations in these cases that certain HMA hospitals inappropriately admitted patients and then submitted reimbursement claims for treating those individuals to federal healthcare programs in violation of the False Claims Act or that certain HMA hospitals had inappropriate financial relationships with physicians which violated the Stark law, the Anti-Kickback Statute, and the False Claims Act. Certain of these complaints also allege the same actions violated various state laws which prohibit false claims. The United States has declined to intervene in three of the eleven matters, namely U.S. ex rel. Anita France, et al. v. Health Management Associates, Inc. (Middle District Florida) (“France”) which involved allegations of wrongful billing and was settled; U.S. ex rel. Sandra Simmons v. Health Management Associates, Inc. et al. (Eastern District Oklahoma) (“Simmons”) which alleges unnecessary surgery by an employed physician and which was settled as to all allegations except alleged wrongful termination; and U.S. ex rel. David Napoliello, M.D. v. Health Management Associates, Inc. (Middle District Florida) (“Napoliello”) which alleges inappropriate admissions. On April 3, 2014, the Multi District Litigation Panel ordered the transfer and consolidation for pretrial proceedings of the eight intervened cases, plus the Napoliello matter, to the District of the District of Columbia under the name In Re: Health Management Associates, Inc. Qui Tam Litigation. On June 2, 2014, the court entered a stay of this matter until October 6, 2014, which was subsequently extended until February 27, 2015, May 27, 2015, September 25, 2015, January 25, 2016, May 25, 2016, September 26, 2016, December 27, 2016 and now until April 27, 2017. The Company intends to defend against the allegations in these matters, but also continues to cooperate with the government in the ongoing investigation of these allegations. The Company has been in discussions with the Civil Division of the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) regarding the resolutions of these matters. During the first quarter of 2015, the Company was informed that the Criminal Division continues to investigate former executive-level employees of HMA, and continues to consider whether any HMA entities should be held criminally liable for the acts of the former HMA employees. The Company is voluntarily cooperating with these inquiries and has not been served with any subpoenas or other legal process.

Other Probable Contingencies

Lopez v. Yakima Regional Medial & Cardiac Center and Toppenish Community Hospital. This class action lawsuit arose out of alleged conduct at these hospitals prior to the HMA acquisition. The suit alleges the hospitals’ charity care policies did not comply with Washington state law. The trial court has certified a class and granted partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. This matter has now been settled. The Company has recorded an estimate of the probable liability at December 31, 2016 based on the settlement of this matter.

157

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

court dismissed Community Health Systems, Inc. from the state case and subsequently certified the state case for an interlocutory appeal of the denial to dismiss his employer and the management company. The appellate court accepted the interlocutory appeal, and it was argued on April 30, 2014. On August 14, 2014, the court denied the Company’s appeal. On October 20, 2014, the Company filed a petition to review the denial with the Washington Supreme Court. The appeal was accepted and oral argument was heard on June 9, 2015. On September 15, 2015, the court denied the Company’s appeal and remanded to the trial court; a previous trial setting of September 12, 2016 has been vacated and not reset. The Company continues to vigorously defend these actions.

Summary of Recorded Amounts

The table below presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability balances (in millions) during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, with respect to the Company’s fair value determination in connection with HMA Legal Matters that were not previously accrued by HMA, the estimated liability in connection with HMA legal matters that were previously recorded by HMA as a probable contingency, and the remaining contingencies of the Company in respect of which an accrual has been recorded. In addition, future legal fees (which are expensed as incurred) and costs related to possible indemnification and criminal investigation matters associated with the HMA Legal Matters have not been accrued or included in the table below. Furthermore, although not accrued, such costs, if incurred, will be taken into account in determining the total amount of reductions applied to the amounts owed to CVR holders.


	CVR-Related Liability at Fair Value			CVR-Related Liability for Probable Contingencies			Other Probable Contingencies
Balance as of December 31, 2014	$	265		$	29		$	125
Expense (income)		4			(12	)		20
Cash payments		(8	)		(17	)		(135	)

Balance as of December 31, 2015	$	261		$	-		$	10
(Income) expense		(8	)		-			14
Reserve for insured claim		-			-			1
Cash payments		(1	)		-			(11	)

Balance as of December 31, 2016	$	252		$	-		$	14

With respect to the “Other Probable Contingencies” referenced in the chart above, in accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Company establishes a liability for litigation, regulatory and governmental matters for which, based on information currently available, the Company believes that a negative outcome is known or is probable and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. For all such matters (whether or not discussed in this contingencies footnote), such amounts have been recorded in other accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet and are included in the table above in the “Other Probable Contingencies” column. Due to the uncertainties and difficulty in predicting the ultimate resolution of these contingencies, the actual amount could differ from the estimated amount reflected as a liability on the consolidated balance sheet.

In the aggregate, attorneys’ fees and other costs incurred but not included in the table above related to probable contingencies, and CVR-related contingencies accounted for at fair value, totaled $4 million and $9 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and are included in other operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of (loss) income.

Matters for which an Outcome Cannot be Assessed

For the legal matters below, the Company cannot at this time assess what the outcome may be and is further unable to determine any estimate of loss or range of loss. Because the matters below are at a preliminary stage and other factors, there are not sufficient facts available to make these assessments.

158

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Class Action Shareholder Federal Securities Cases. Three purported class action cases have been filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee; namely, Norfolk County Retirement System v. Community Health Systems, Inc., et al., filed May 9, 2011; De Zheng v. Community Health Systems, Inc., et al., filed May 12, 2011; and Minneapolis Firefighters Relief Association v. Community Health Systems, Inc., et al., filed June 21, 2011. All three seek class certification on behalf of purchasers of the Company’s common stock between July 27, 2006 and April 11, 2011 and allege that misleading statements resulted in artificially inflated prices for the Company’s common stock. In December 2011, the cases were consolidated for pretrial purposes and NYC Funds and its counsel were selected as lead plaintiffs/lead plaintiffs’ counsel. In lieu of ruling on the Company’s motion to dismiss, the court permitted the plaintiffs to file a first amended consolidated class action complaint, which was filed on October 5, 2015. The Company’s motion to dismiss was filed on November 4, 2015 and oral argument was held on April 11, 2016. The Company’s motion to dismiss was granted on June 16, 2016 and on June 27, 2016, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. The matter is fully briefed and the Company is waiting on the setting of a date for oral argument. The Company believes this consolidated matter is without merit and will vigorously defend this case.

Other Matters

Shareholder Derivative Actions. Three purported shareholder derivative actions have also been filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee; Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 630 Pension Annuity Trust Fund v. Wayne T. Smith, et al., filed May 24, 2011; Roofers Local No. 149 Pension Fund v. Wayne T. Smith, et al., filed June 21, 2011; and Lambert Sweat v. Wayne T. Smith, et al., filed October 5, 2011. These three cases allege breach of fiduciary duty arising out of allegedly improper inpatient admission practices, mismanagement, waste and unjust enrichment. These cases have been consolidated into a single, consolidated action. The plaintiffs filed an operative amended derivative complaint in these three consolidated actions on March 15, 2012. The Company’s motion to dismiss was argued on June 13, 2013. On September 27, 2013, the court issued an order granting in part and denying in part the Company’s motion to dismiss. This case was settled pursuant a final order entered on January 17, 2017. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, the Company is required to adopt and maintain for a specified period certain corporate governance measures. For more information, see the order and stipulation of settlement filed as Exhibit 99.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated all material events occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date for events requiring disclosure or recognition in the consolidated financial statements.

As noted above, a final order approving the terms of settlement of the shareholder derivative action was entered on January 17, 2017. In January 2017, the Company received $40 million of proceeds, which is net of attorneys’ costs, from the settlement of this litigation. These proceeds were paid out of the Company’s directors and officers’ insurance policy.

On February 16, 2017, the Company signed a definitive agreement for the sale of eight hospitals and their associated assets to subsidiaries of Steward Health, Inc. The facilities included in this transaction are Easton Hospital (254 licensed beds) in Easton, Pennsylvania, Sharon Regional Health System (258 licensed beds) in Sharon, Pennsylvania, Northside Medical Center (355 licensed beds) in Youngstown, Ohio, Trumbull Memorial Hospital (311 licensed beds) in Warren, Ohio, Hillside Rehabilitation Hospital (69 licensed beds) in Warren, Ohio, Wuesthoff Health System – Rockledge (298 licensed beds) in Rockledge, Florida, Wuesthoff Health System – Melbourne (119 licensed beds) in Melbourne, Florida and Sebastian River Medical Center (154 licensed beds) in Sebastian, Florida.

159

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

19. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)


	Quarter
	1^st			2^nd			3^rd			4^th			Total (2)
	(in millions, except share and per share data)
Year ended December 31, 2016:
Net operating revenues	$	4,999		$	4,590		$	4,380		$	4,469		$	18,438
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		63			(1,543	)		(83	)		(152	)		(1,715	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations		37			(1,405	)		(54	)		(189	)		(1,611	)
Loss from discontinued operations		(1	)		(1	)		(2	)		(9	)		(15	)
Net income (loss) attributable to Community
Health Systems, Inc.	$	11		$	(1,432	)	$	(79	)	$	(220	)	$	(1,721	)
Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. common stockholders(1):
Continuing operations	$	0.11		$	(12.90	)	$	(0.69	)	$	(1.91	)	$	(15.41	)
Discontinued operations		(0.01	)		(0.01	)		(0.02	)		(0.09	)		(0.13	)

Net income (loss)	$	0.10		$	(12.91	)	$	(0.71	)	$	(1.99	)	$	(15.54	)

Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. common stockholders(1):
Continuing operations	$	0.11		$	(12.90	)	$	(0.69	)	$	(1.91	)	$	(15.41	)
Discontinued operations		(0.01	)		(0.01	)		(0.02	)		(0.09	)		(0.13	)

Net income (loss)	$	0.10		$	(12.91	)	$	(0.71	)	$	(1.99	)	$	(15.54	)

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding:
Basic		110,247,867			110,879,285			110,888,040			110,905,052			110,730,971
Diluted		110,309,372			110,879,285			110,888,040			110,905,052			110,730,971
Year ended December 31, 2015:
Net operating revenues	$	4,911		$	4,882		$	4,846		$	4,798		$	19,437
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		168			214			121			(91	)		411
Income (loss) from continuing operations		112			140			83			(40	)		295
Loss from discontinued operations		(13	)		(6	)		(8	)		(9	)		(36	)
Net income (loss) attributable to Community
Health Systems, Inc.	$	79		$	111		$	52		$	(83	)	$	158
Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. common stockholders(1):
Continuing operations	$	0.80		$	1.02		$	0.52		$	(0.66	)	$	1.69
Discontinued operations		(0.11	)		(0.06	)		(0.07	)		(0.08	)		(0.31	)

Net income (loss)	$	0.69		$	0.96		$	0.45		$	(0.73	)	$	1.38

Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. common stockholders(1):
Continuing operations	$	0.79		$	1.01		$	0.51		$	(0.66	)	$	1.68
Discontinued operations		(0.11	)		(0.06	)		(0.07	)		(0.08	)		(0.31	)

Net income (loss)	$	0.68		$	0.95		$	0.44		$	(0.73	)	$	1.37

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding:
Basic		114,419,590			115,194,899			115,319,986			112,891,505			114,454,674
Diluted		115,057,668			116,100,417			116,368,157			112,891,505			115,272,404

(1)	Total per share amounts may not add due to rounding.

(2)	Total quarterly amounts may not add due to rounding.

160

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

20. SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The Senior Notes due 2019, 2020 and 2022, which are senior unsecured obligations of CHS, and the 5¹⁄₈% Senior Secured Notes due 2018 and 2021 (collectively, “the Notes”) are guaranteed on a senior basis by the Company and by certain of its existing and subsequently acquired or organized 100% owned domestic subsidiaries. The Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis, with exceptions considered customary for such guarantees, limited to the release of the guarantee when a subsidiary guarantor’s capital stock is sold, or a sale of all of the subsidiary guarantor’s assets used in operations. The following condensed consolidating financial statements present Community Health Systems, Inc. (as parent guarantor), CHS (as the issuer), the subsidiary guarantors, the subsidiary non-guarantors and eliminations. These condensed consolidating financial statements have been prepared and presented in accordance with SEC Regulation S-X Rule 3-10 “Financial Statements of Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities Registered or Being Registered.”

The accounting policies used in the preparation of this financial information are consistent with those elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements of the Company, except as noted below:

•

Intercompany receivables and payables are presented gross in the supplemental condensed consolidating balance sheets.

•

Cash flows from intercompany transactions are presented in cash flows from financing activities, as changes in intercompany balances with affiliates, net.

•

Income tax expense is allocated from the parent guarantor to the income producing operations (other guarantors and non-guarantors) and the issuer through stockholders’ equity. As this approach represents an allocation, the income tax expense allocation is considered non-cash for statement of cash flow purposes.

•

Interest expense, net has been presented to reflect net interest expense and interest income from outstanding long-term debt and intercompany balances.

The Company’s intercompany activity consists primarily of daily cash transfers for purposes of cash management, the allocation of certain expenses and expenditures paid for by the Parent on behalf of its subsidiaries, and the push down of investment in its subsidiaries. This activity also includes the intercompany transactions between consolidated entities as part of the Receivables Facility that is further discussed in Note 7. The Company’s subsidiaries generally do not purchase services from one another; thus, the intercompany transactions do not represent revenue generating transactions. All intercompany transactions eliminate in consolidation.

From time to time, subsidiaries of the Company sell and/or repurchase noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries, which may change subsidiaries between guarantors and non-guarantors. Effective with the spin-off of QHC, all subsidiaries of the Company that were part of that distribution have been removed as guarantors. Amounts for prior periods have been revised to reflect the status of guarantors or non-guarantors as of December 31, 2016.

161

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Loss

Year Ended December 31, 2016


	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			Other Guarantors			Non - Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(In millions)
Operating revenues (net of contractual allowances and discounts)	$	-		$	(25	)	$	13,213		$	8,087		$	-		$	21,275
Provision for bad debts		-			-			1,902			935			-			2,837

Net operating revenues		-			(25	)		11,311			7,152			-			18,438
Operating costs and expenses:
Salaries and benefits		-			-			4,569			4,055			-			8,624
Supplies		-			-			1,990			1,021			-			3,011
Other operating expenses		-			-			2,823			1,425			-			4,248
Government and other legal settlements and related costs		-			-			16			-			-			16
Electronic health records incentive reimbursement		-			-			(42	)		(28	)		-			(70	)
Rent		-			-			235			215			-			450
Depreciation and amortization		-			-			734			366			-			1,100
Impairment and (gain) loss on sale of businesses, net		-			-			1,409			510			-			1,919

Total operating costs and expenses		-			-			11,734			7,564			-			19,298

Loss from operations		-			(25	)		(423	)		(412	)		-			(860	)
Interest expense, net		-			241			655			66			-			962
Loss from early extinguishment of debt		-			30			-			-			-			30
Gain on sale of investments in unconsolidated affiliates		-			-			(94	)		-			-			(94	)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates		1,721			1,461			467			-			(3,692	)		(43	)

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes		(1,721	)		(1,757	)		(1,451	)		(478	)		3,692			(1,715	)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes		-			(36	)		7			(75	)		-			(104	)

(Loss) income from continuing operations		(1,721	)		(1,721	)		(1,458	)		(403	)		3,692			(1,611	)
Discontinued operations, net of taxes:
(Loss) income from operations of entities sold or held for sale		-			-			(9	)		2			-			(7	)
Impairment of hospitals sold or held for sale		-			-			(2	)		(6	)		-			(8	)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		-			-			(11	)		(4	)		-			(15	)

Net (loss) income		(1,721	)		(1,721	)		(1,469	)		(407	)		3,692			(1,626	)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		-			-			-			95			-			95

Net (loss) income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders	$	(1,721	)	$	(1,721	)	$	(1,469	)	$	(502	)	$	3,692		$	(1,721	)

162

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income

Year Ended December 31, 2015


	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			Other Guarantors			Non - Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(In millions)
Operating revenues (net of contractual allowances and discounts)	$	-		$	(20	)	$	12,983		$	9,601		$	-		$	22,564
Provision for bad debts		-			-			1,961			1,166			-			3,127

Net operating revenues		-			(20	)		11,022			8,435			-			19,437
Operating costs and expenses:
Salaries and benefits		-			-			4,506			4,485			-			8,991
Supplies		-			-			1,911			1,137			-			3,048
Other operating expenses		-			-			2,693			1,827			-			4,520
Government and other legal settlements and related costs		-			-			4			-			-			4
Electronic health records incentive reimbursement		-			-			(95	)		(65	)		-			(160	)
Rent		-			-			223			234			-			457
Depreciation and amortization		-			-			729			443			-			1,172
Impairment and (gain) loss on sale of businesses, net		-			-			55			13			-			68

Total operating costs and expenses		-			-			10,026			8,074			-			18,100

(Loss) income from operations		-			(20	)		996			361			-			1,337
Interest expense, net		-			107			742			124			-			973
Loss from early extinguishment of debt		-			16			-			-			-			16
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates		(158	)		(226	)		(106	)		-			427			(63	)

Income from continuing operations before income taxes		158			83			360			237			(427	)		411
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes		-			(75	)		136			55			-			116

Income (loss) from continuing operations		158			158			224			182			(427	)		295
Discontinued operations, net of taxes:
Loss from operations of entities sold or held for sale		-			-			(3	)		(24	)		-			(27	)
Impairment of hospitals sold or held for sale		-			-			(5	)		-			-			(5	)
Loss on sale, net		-			-			-			(4	)		-			(4	)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		-			-			(8	)		(28	)		-			(36	)

Net income		158			158			216			154			(427	)		259
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		-			-			-			101			-			101

Net income attributable to Community Health
Systems, Inc. stockholders	$	158		$	158		$	216		$	53		$	(427	)	$	158

163

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income

Year Ended December 31, 2014


	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			Other Guarantors			Non - Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(In millions)
Operating revenues (net of contractual allowances and discounts)	$	-		$	(18	)	$	12,420		$	9,159		$	-		$	21,561
Provision for bad debts		-			-			1,819			1,103			-			2,922

Net operating revenues		-			(18	)		10,601			8,056			-			18,639
Operating costs and expenses:
Salaries and benefits		-			-			4,394			4,224			-			8,618
Supplies		-			-			1,804			1,058			-			2,862
Other operating expenses		-			-			2,401			1,921			-			4,322
Government and other legal settlements and related costs		-			-			101			-			-			101
Electronic health records incentive reimbursement		-			-			(149	)		(110	)		-			(259	)
Rent		-			-			216			218			-			434
Depreciation and amortization		-			-			708			398			-			1,106
Amortization of software to be abandoned		-			-			45			30			-			75
Impairment and (gain) loss on sale of businesses, net		-			-			40			1			-			41

Total operating costs and expenses		-			-			9,560			7,740			-			17,300

(Loss) income from operations		-			(18	)		1,041			316			-			1,339
Interest expense, net		-			(10	)		492			490			-			972
Loss from early extinguishment of debt		-			73			-			-			-			73
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates		(92	)		(222	)		179			-			87			(48	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		92			141			370			(174	)		(87	)		342
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes		-			49			136			(103	)		-			82

Income (loss) from continuing operations		92			92			234			(71	)		(87	)		260
Discontinued operations, net of taxes:
(Loss) income from operations of entities sold or held for sale		-			-			(12	)		5			-			(7	)
Impairment of hospitals sold or held for sale		-			-			-			(50	)		-			(50	)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		-			-			(12	)		(45	)		-			(57	)

Net income (loss)		92			92			222			(116	)		(87	)		203
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		-			-			-			111			-			111

Net income (loss) attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders	$	92		$	92		$	222		$	(227	)	$	(87	)	$	92

164

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Loss

Year Ended December 31, 2016


	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			Other Guarantors			Non - Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(In millions)
Net loss	$	(1,721	)	$	(1,721	)	$	(1,469	)	$	(407	)	$	3,692		$	(1,626	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes:
Net change in fair value of interest rate swaps, net of tax		17			17			-			-			(17	)		17
Net change in fair value of available-for-sale securities, net of tax		(11	)		(11	)		(11	)		-			22			(11	)
Amortization and recognition of unrecognized pension cost components, net of tax		3			3			3			-			(6	)		3

Other comprehensive income (loss)		9			9			(8	)		-			(1	)		9

Comprehensive loss		(1,712	)		(1,712	)		(1,477	)		(407	)		3,691			(1,617	)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		-			-			-			95			-			95

Comprehensive loss attributable to
Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders	$	(1,712	)	$	(1,712	)	$	(1,477	)	$	(502	)	$	3,691		$	(1,712	)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income

Year Ended December 31, 2015


	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			Other Guarantors			Non - Guarantors		Eliminations			Consolidated
	(In millions)
Net income	$	158		$	158		$	216		$	154	$	(427	)	$	259
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of income taxes:
Net change in fair value of interest rate swaps, net of tax		(6	)		(6	)		-			-		6			(6	)
Net change in fair value of available-for-sale securities, net of tax		(5	)		(5	)		(5	)		-		10			(5	)
Amortization and recognition of unrecognized pension cost components, net of tax		1			1			1			-		(2	)		1

Other comprehensive loss		(10	)		(10	)		(4	)		-		14			(10	)

Comprehensive income		148			148			212			154		(413	)		249
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		-			-			-			101		-			101

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to
Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders	$	148		$	148		$	212		$	53	$	(413	)	$	148

165

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income

Year Ended December 31, 2014


	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			Other Guarantors			Non - Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(In millions)
Net income (loss)	$	92		$	92		$	222		$	(116	)	$	(87	)	$	203
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes:
Net change in fair value of interest rate swaps, net of tax		13			13			-			-			(13	)		13
Net change in fair value of available-for-sale securities, net of tax		-			-			-			-			-			-
Amortization and recognition of unrecognized pension cost components, net of tax		(9	)		(9	)		(9	)		-			18			(9	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)		4			4			(9	)		-			5			4

Comprehensive income (loss)		96			96			213			(116	)		(82	)		207
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		-			-			-			111			-			111

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders	$	96		$	96		$	213		$	(227	)	$	(82	)	$	96

166

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

December 31, 2016


	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			Other Guarantors			Non - Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(In millions)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	-		$	-		$	162		$	76		$	-		$	238
Patient accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts		-			-			843			2,333			-			3,176
Supplies		-			-			324			156			-			480
Prepaid income taxes		17			-			-			-			-			17
Prepaid expenses and taxes		-			-			133			54			-			187
Other current assets		-			-			283			285			-			568

Total current assets		17			-			1,745			2,904			-			4,666

Intercompany receivable		295			14,966			667			6,985			(22,913	)		-

Property and equipment, net		-			-			5,403			2,746			-			8,149

Goodwill		-			-			3,735			2,786			-			6,521

Other assets, net		15			-			2,820			995			(1,222	)		2,608

Net investment in subsidiaries		1,728			22,205			8,607			-			(32,540	)		-

Total assets	$	2,055		$	37,171		$	22,977		$	16,416		$	(56,675	)	$	21,944


LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	-		$	149		$	56		$	250		$	-		$	455
Accounts payable		-			-			715			280			-			995
Accrued interest		-			205			1			1			-			207
Accrued liabilities		17			-			775			438			-			1,230

Total current liabilities		17			354			1,547			969			-			2,887

Long-term debt		-			14,018			233			538			-			14,789

Intercompany payable		-			19,811			17,508			13,393			(50,712	)		-

Deferred income taxes		411			-			-			-			-			411

Other long-term liabilities		12			1,259			1,187			339			(1,222	)		1,575

Total liabilities		440			35,442			20,475			15,239			(51,934	)		19,662

Redeemable noncontrolling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries		-			-			-			554			-			554

Equity:
Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders’ equity:
Common stock		1			-			-			-			-			1
Additional paid-in capital		1,975			676			1,080			816			(2,572	)		1,975
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(62	)		(62	)		(22	)		(9	)		93			(62	)
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings		(299	)		1,115			1,444			(297	)		(2,262	)		(299	)

Total Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders’ equity		1,615			1,729			2,502			510			(4,741	)		1,615
Noncontrolling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries		-			-			-			113			-			113

Total equity		1,615			1,729			2,502			623			(4,741	)		1,728

Total liabilities and equity	$	2,055		$	37,171		$	22,977		$	16,416		$	(56,675	)	$	21,944

167

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

December 31, 2015


	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			Other Guarantors			Non - Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(In millions)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	-		$	-		$	31		$	153		$	-		$	184
Patient accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts		-			-			924			2,687			-			3,611
Supplies		-			-			362			218			-			580
Prepaid income taxes		27			-			-			-			-			27
Prepaid expenses and taxes		-			-			128			69			-			197
Other current assets		-			-			336			231			-			567

Total current assets		27			-			1,781			3,358			-			5,166

Intercompany receivable		1,159			16,540			4,062			7,479			(29,240	)		-

Property and equipment, net		-			-			6,311			3,801			-			10,112

Goodwill		-			-			5,501			3,464			-			8,965

Other assets, net		-			-			2,185			1,212			(1,045	)		2,352

Net investment in subsidiaries		3,438			20,257			9,354			-			(33,049	)		-

Total assets	$	4,624		$	36,797		$	29,194		$	19,314		$	(63,334	)	$	26,595


LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	-		$	162		$	49		$	18		$	-		$	229
Accounts payable		-			-			785			473			-			1,258
Accrued interest		-			226			-			1			-			227
Accrued liabilities		4			-			824			530			-			1,358

Total current liabilities		4			388			1,658			1,022			-			3,072

Long-term debt		-			15,605			136			815			-			16,556

Intercompany payable		-			16,150			22,232			15,524			(53,906	)		-

Deferred income taxes		593			-			-			-			-			593

Other long-term liabilities		8			1,216			1,196			322			(1,044	)		1,698

Total liabilities		605			33,359			25,222			17,683			(54,950	)		21,919

Redeemable noncontrolling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries		-			-			-			571			-			571

Equity:
Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders’ equity:
Common stock		1			-			-			-			-			1
Additional paid-in capital		1,963			1,324			1,505			965			(3,794	)		1,963
Treasury stock, at cost		(7	)		-			-			-			-			(7	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(73	)		(73	)		(21	)		(3	)		97			(73	)
Retained earnings		2,135			2,187			2,488			12			(4,687	)		2,135

Total Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders’ equity		4,019			3,438			3,972			974			(8,384	)		4,019
Noncontrolling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries		-			-			-			86			-			86

Total equity		4,019			3,438			3,972			1,060			(8,384	)		4,105

Total liabilities and equity	$	4,624		$	36,797		$	29,194		$	19,314		$	(63,334	)	$	26,595

168

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2016


	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			Other Guarantors			Non - Guarantors			Eliminations		Consolidated
	(In millions)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	14		$	(335	)	$	1,322		$	136		$	-	$	1,137

Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisitions of facilities and other related equipment		-			-			(3	)		(120	)		-		(123	)
Purchases of property and equipment		-			-			(519	)		(225	)		-		(744	)
Proceeds from disposition of hospitals and other ancillary operations		-			-			16			127			-		143
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		-			-			8			7			-		15
Purchases of available-for-sale securities		-			-			(263	)		(242	)		-		(505	)
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities		-			-			218			246			-		464
Proceeds from sale of investments in unconsolidated affiliates		-			-			403			-			-		403
Distribution from Quorum Health Corporation		-			1,219			-			-			-		1,219
Increase in other investments		-			-			(178	)		(64	)		-		(242	)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		-			1,219			(318	)		(271	)		-		630


Cash flows from financing activities:
Repurchase of restricted stock shares for payroll tax withholding requirements		(6	)		-			-			-			-		(6	)
Deferred financing costs and other debt-related costs		-			(26	)		-			-			-		(26	)
Redemption of noncontrolling investments in joint ventures		-			-			-			(19	)		-		(19	)
Distributions to noncontrolling investors in joint ventures		-			-			-			(92	)		-		(92	)
Proceeds from sale-lease back		-			-			147			12			-		159
Changes in intercompany balances with affiliates, net		(8	)		801			(980	)		187			-		-
Borrowings under credit agreements		-			4,848			28			3			-		4,879
Proceeds from receivables facility		-			-			-			107			-		107
Repayments of long-term indebtedness		-			(6,507	)		(68	)		(140	)		-		(6,715	)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(14	)		(884	)		(873	)		58			-		(1,713	)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		-			-			131			(77	)		-		54
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		-			-			31			153			-		184

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	-		$	-		$	162		$	76		$	-	$	238

169

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2015


	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			Other Guarantors			Non - Guarantors			Eliminations		Consolidated
	(In millions)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(25	)	$	159		$	569		$	218		$	-	$	921

Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisitions of facilities and other related equipment		-			-			(21	)		(36	)		-		(57	)
Purchases of property and equipment		-			-			(660	)		(293	)		-		(953	)
Proceeds from disposition of hospitals and other ancillary operations		-			-			21			134			-		155
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		-			-			7			8			-		15
Purchases of available-for-sale securities		-			-			(53	)		(109	)		-		(162	)
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities		-			-			46			110			-		156
Increase in other investments		-			-			(156	)		(49	)		-		(205	)

Net cash used in investing activities		-			-			(816	)		(235	)		-		(1,051	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		25			-			-			-			-		25
Repurchase of restricted stock shares for payroll tax withholding requirements		(20	)		-			-			-			-		(20	)
Stock buy-back		(159	)		-			-			-			-		(159	)
Deferred financing costs and other debt-related costs		-			(30	)		-			-			-		(30	)
Proceeds from noncontrolling investors in joint ventures		-			-			-			47			-		47
Redemption of noncontrolling investments in joint ventures		-			-			-			(36	)		-		(36	)
Distributions to noncontrolling investors in joint ventures		-			-			-			(100	)		-		(100	)
Changes in intercompany balances with affiliates, net		179			(181	)		(57	)		59			-		-
Borrowings under credit agreements		-			4,880			34			8			-		4,922
Proceeds from receivables facility		-			-			-			206			-		206
Repayments of long-term indebtedness		-			(4,828	)		(69	)		(153	)		-		(5,050	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		25			(159	)		(92	)		31			-		(195	)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		-			-			(339	)		14			-		(325	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		-			-			370			139			-		509

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	-		$	-		$	31		$	153		$	-	$	184

170

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2014


	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			Other Guarantors			Non - Guarantors			Eliminations		Consolidated
	(In millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	176		$	319		$	919		$	201		$	-	$	1,615

Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisitions of facilities and other related equipment		-			-			(2,876	)		(215	)		-		(3,091	)
Purchases of property and equipment		-			-			(577	)		(276	)		-		(853	)
Proceeds from disposition of hospitals and other ancillary operations		-			-			3			85			-		88
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		-			-			41			9			-		50
Purchases of available-for-sale securities		-			-			(23	)		(240	)		-		(263	)
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities		-			-			24			205			-		229
Increase in other investments		-			-			(352	)		(159	)		-		(511	)

Net cash used in investing activities		-			-			(3,760	)		(591	)		-		(4,351	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		65			-			-			-			-		65
Repurchase of restricted stock shares for payroll tax withholding requirements		(11	)		-			-			-			-		(11	)
Stock buy-back		(9	)		-			-			-			-		(9	)
Deferred financing costs and other debt-related costs		-			(276	)		-			-			-		(276	)
Proceeds from noncontrolling investors in joint ventures		-			-			-			10			-		10
Redemption of noncontrolling investments in joint ventures		-			-			-			(158	)		-		(158	)
Distributions to noncontrolling investors in joint ventures		-			-			-			(104	)		-		(104	)
Changes in intercompany balances with affiliates, net		(221	)		(3,334	)		3,017			538			-		-
Borrowings under credit agreements		-			9,081			34			16			-		9,131
Issuance of long-term debt		-			4,000			-			-			-		4,000
Proceeds from receivables facility		-			-			-			204			-		204
Repayments of long-term indebtedness		-			(9,790	)		(89	)		(101	)		-		(9,980	)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(176	)		(319	)		2,962			405			-		2,872

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		-			-			121			15			-		136
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		-			-			249			124			-		373

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	-		$	-		$	370		$	139		$	-	$	509

171

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, with the participation of other members of management, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a- 15(e) and 15d-15(e)) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluations, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective (at the reasonable assurance level) to ensure that the information required to be included in this report has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and to ensure that the information required to be included in this report was accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting is included herein at page 173.

The attestation report from Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, on our internal control over financial reporting is included herein at page 174.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

172

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We are responsible for the preparation and integrity of the consolidated financial statements appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include amounts based on management’s estimates and judgments. All other financial information in this report has been presented on a basis consistent with the information included in the consolidated financial statements.

We are also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). We maintain a system of internal controls that is designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the fair and reliable preparation and presentation of the consolidated financial statements, as well as to safeguard assets from unauthorized use or disposition.

Our control environment is the foundation for our system of internal control over financial reporting and is embodied in our Code of Conduct. It sets the tone of our organization and includes factors such as integrity and ethical values. Our internal control over financial reporting is supported by formal policies and procedures which are reviewed, modified and improved as changes occur in business conditions and operations.

The Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed solely of outside directors, meets periodically with members of management, the internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm to review and discuss internal control over financial reporting and accounting and financial reporting matters. The independent registered public accounting firm and internal auditors report to the Audit and Compliance Committee and have full and free access to the Audit and Compliance Committee at any time.

We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. We have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016, based on these criteria.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.

We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

173

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Community Health Systems, Inc.

Franklin, Tennessee

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Community Health Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles , and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 of the Company and our report dated February 21, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and schedule.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Nashville, Tennessee

February 21, 2017

174

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The Company has adopted a Code of Conduct that is applicable to all members of the Board of Directors and our officers, as well as employees of our subsidiaries. A copy of the current version of our Code of Conduct is available in the Company-Overview — Corporate Governance section of our internet website at www.chs.net/company-overview/corporate-governance. A copy of the Code of Conduct is also available in print, free of charge, to any stockholder who requests it by writing to Community Health Systems, Inc., Investor Relations, at 4000 Meridian Boulevard, Franklin, TN 37067. The Company intends to post amendments to or waivers, if any, from its Code of Conduct at this location on its website, in each case to the extent such amendment or waiver would otherwise require the filing of a Current Report on Form 8-K pursuant to Item 5.05 thereof.

The committee report of the Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors is presented below. The other information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed under Regulation 14A in connection with the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of the Company scheduled to be held on May 16, 2017, under “General Information,” “Members of the Board of Directors,” “Information About our Executive Officers,” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.”

AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company is composed of three directors, each of whom is “independent” as defined by the listing standards of the NYSE and Section 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. All of our Audit and Compliance Committee members meet the Securities and Exchange Commission definition of “audit committee financial expert.” The Audit and Compliance Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors, which is posted on our corporate website (www.chs.net) and which is reviewed by the Committee annually, in conjunction with the Committee’s annual self-evaluation. The Company’s management is responsible for its internal controls and the financial reporting process. Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, is responsible for performing an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and to issue its reports thereon. The Audit and Compliance Committee is responsible for, among other things, monitoring and overseeing these processes, and recommending to the Board of Directors: (i) that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K; and (ii) the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

In keeping with that responsibility, the Audit and Compliance Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements with management and with the independent registered public accounting firm, reviewed internal controls and accounting procedures and provided oversight review of the Company’s corporate compliance program. In addition, the Audit and Compliance Committee has discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

The Audit and Compliance Committee discussed with the Company’s internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit and Compliance Committee met with the internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm with and without management present to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

The Audit and Compliance Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence. The Audit and Compliance Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence and also has reviewed the amount of fees paid to the independent registered accounting firm for audit and non-audit services.

Based on the Audit and Compliance Committee’s discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm and the Audit and Compliance Committee’s review of the representations of management and the materials it received from the independent registered public accounting firm as described above, the Audit and Compliance Committee

175

recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for filing with the SEC.

This report is respectfully submitted by the Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors.

THE AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE

John A. Clerico, Chair

James S. Ely III

John A. Fry

H. James Williams, Ph.D.

176

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed under Regulation 14A in connection with the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of the Company scheduled to be held on May 16, 2017 under “Executive Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Director Compensation,” and “Compensation Committee Report.”

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed under Regulation 14A in connection with the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of the Company scheduled to be held on May 16, 2017 under “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information.”

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed under Regulation 14A in connection with the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of the Company scheduled to be held on May 16, 2017 under “General Information” and “Relationships and Certain Transactions Between the Company and Its Officers, Directors and 5% Beneficial Owners and Their Family Members.”

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed under Regulation 14A in connection with the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of the Company scheduled to be held on May 16, 2017 under “Fees Paid to Auditors” and “Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services.”

177

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Item 15(a) 1. Financial Statements

Reference is made to the index of financial statements and supplementary data under Item 8 in Part II.

Item 15(a) 2. Financial Statement Schedules

The following financial statement schedule is filed as part of this Form 10-K at page 196 hereof:

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

All other schedules are omitted since the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

Item 15(a)(3):

The following exhibits are either filed with this Report or incorporated herein by reference.


No.		Description
2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 29, 2013, by and among Health Management Associates, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc. and FWCT-2 Acquisition Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 30, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

2.2		Amendment and Consent to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 24, 2013, by and among Health Management Associates, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc. and FWCT-2 Acquisition Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 25, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

2.3		Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated April 29, 2016, by and between Community Health Systems, Inc. and Quorum Health Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

2.4		Tax Matters Agreement, dated April 29, 2016, by and between Community Health Systems, Inc. and Quorum Health Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

2.5		Employee Matters Agreement, dated April 29, 2016, by and between Community Health Systems, Inc. and Quorum Health Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

2.6		Amendment to the Employee Matters Agreement, effective as of April 29, 2016, by and between Community Health Systems, Inc. and Quorum Health Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

3.1		Form of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Community Health Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed June 8, 2000 (No. 333-31790))

178


No.		Description
3.2		Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Community Health Systems, Inc., dated May 18, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 20, 2010 (No. 001-15925))

3.3		Amended and Restated By-laws of Community Health Systems, Inc. (as of December 7, 2016) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 12, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.1		Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 filed May 7, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.2		Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2016, between Community Health Systems, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as Rights Agent, including as Exhibit A the forms of Rights Certificate and of Election to Exercise and as Exhibit B the Form of Certificate of Designation and Terms of Participating Preferred Stock of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 3, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.3		Senior Notes Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of November 22, 2011, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the Guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed February 23, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.4		Form of 8.000% Senior Note due 2019 (included in Exhibit 4.3)

4.5		Registration Rights Agreement relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of November 22, 2011, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the Guarantors party thereto and the Initial Purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed February 23, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.6		First Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of January 31, 2012, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.35 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-4/A filed April 2, 2012 (No. 333-180265))

4.7		Second Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of March 31, 2012, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.36 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-4/A filed April 2, 2012 (No. 333-180265))

4.8		Third Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of May 15, 2012, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 18, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.9		Fourth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of September 30, 2012, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed November 1, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

179


No.		Description
4.10		Fifth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of March 31, 2013, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 filed April 30, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

4.11		Sixth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of September 30, 2013, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 filed October 31, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

4.12		Seventh Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of February 12, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed February 26, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.13		Eighth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of June 30, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 filed August 1, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.14		Ninth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of December 1, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed February 25, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.15		Tenth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of March 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 filed May 6, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.16		Eleventh Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 filed August 4, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.17		Twelfth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of September 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed November 3, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

180


No.		Description
4.18		Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of December 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed February 17, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.19		Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of March 31, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed May 3, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.20		Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of September 30, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 filed November 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.21		Senior Notes Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of July 18, 2012, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the Guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 18, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.22		Form of 7.125% Senior Note due 2020 (included in Exhibit 4.21)

4.23		First Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of September 30, 2012, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed November 1, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.24		Second Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of March 31, 2013, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 filed April 30, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

4.25		Third Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of September 30, 2013, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 filed October 31, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

4.26		Fourth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of February 12, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed February 26, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

181


No.		Description
4.27		Fifth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of June 30, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 filed August 1, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.28		Sixth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of December 1, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.23 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed February 25, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.29		Seventh Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of March 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 filed May 6, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.30		Eighth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 filed August 4, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.31		Ninth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of September 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed November 3, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.32		Tenth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of December 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.29 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed February 17, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.33		Eleventh Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of March 31, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed May 3, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.34		Twelfth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of September 30, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30 , 2016 filed November 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.35		Senior Secured Notes Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of August 17, 2012, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the Guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 20, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.36		Form of 5.125% Senior Secured Note due 2018 (included in Exhibit 4.35)

182


No.		Description
4.37		First Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of September 30, 2012, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed November 1, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.38		Second Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of March 31, 2013, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 filed April 30, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

4.39		Third Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of September 30, 2013, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 filed October 31, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

4.40		Fourth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of February 12, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.26 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed February 26, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.41		Fifth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of June 30, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 filed August 1, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.42		Sixth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of December 1, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.32 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed February 25, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.43		Seventh Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of March 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 filed May 6, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.44		Eighth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 filed August 4, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

183


No.		Description
4.45		Ninth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of September 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed November 3, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.46		Tenth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of December 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.41 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed February 17, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.47		Eleventh Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of March 31, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed May 3, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.48		Twelfth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of September 30, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 filed November 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.49		Amendment No. 1 and Reaffirmation Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2012, relating to the Amended and Restated Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2007, as amended and restated as of November 5, 2010, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed November 1, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.50		First Lien Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2012, among Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent, Credit Suisse AG, as authorized representative, Regions Bank, as Trustee and authorized representative, and the additional authorized representatives party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed November 1, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.51		Copyright Security Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2012, among Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS Washington Holdings, LLC, Northwest Hospital, LLC, Quorum Health Resources, LLC, and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed November 1, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.52		Trademark Security Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2012, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Blue Island Hospital Company, LLC, CHS Washington Holdings, LLC, Quorum Health Resources, LLC, Triad Healthcare Corporation, Youngstown Ohio Hospital Company, LLC, and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed November 1, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

184


No.		Description
4.53		Senior Secured Notes Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and among FWCT-2 Escrow Corporation, Regions Bank, as Trustee, and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.54		Form of 5.125% Senior Secured Note due 2021 (included in Exhibit 4.53)

4.55		First Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee, and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.56		Second Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of June 30, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 filed August 1, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.57		Third Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of December 1, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.41 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed February 25, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.58		Fourth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of March 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 filed May 6, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.59		Fifth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 filed August 4, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.60		Sixth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of September 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed November 3, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.61		Seventh Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of December 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.54 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed February 17, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

185


No.		Description
4.62		Eighth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of March 31, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed May 3, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.63		Ninth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of September 30, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 filed November 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.64		Senior Notes Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and among FWCT-2 Escrow Corporation and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.65		Form of 6.875% Senior Note due 2022 (included in Exhibit 4.64)

4.66		First Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.67		Second Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of June 30, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 filed August 1, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.68		Third Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of December 1, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.46 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed February 25, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.69		Fourth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of March 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 filed May 6, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.70		Fifth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 filed August 4, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.71		Sixth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of September 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed November 3, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

186


No.		Description
4.72		Seventh Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of December 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.63 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed February 17, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.73		Eighth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of March 31, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed May 3, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.74		Ninth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of September 30, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 filed November 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.75		Secured Notes Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and among FWCT-2 Escrow Corporation, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, each as a representative of the initial purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.76		Unsecured Notes Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and among FWCT-2 Escrow Corporation, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, each as a representative of the initial purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.77		Secured Notes Registration Rights Agreement Joinder, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the subsidiaries party thereto, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, each as a representative of the initial purchasers thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.78		Unsecured Notes Registration Rights Agreement Joinder, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the subsidiaries party thereto, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, each as a representative of the initial purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.1		Amended and Restated Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2007, as amended and restated as of November 5, 2010, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc., the subsidiaries of CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. from time to time party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 9, 2010 (No. 001-15925))

10.2		Third Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2014, to the Credit Agreement dated as of July 25, 2007, as amended and restated as of November 5, 2010 and as of February 2, 2012, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc., the subsidiaries of CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

187


No.		Description
10.3		Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2014, to the Credit Agreement dated as of July 25, 2007, as amended and restated as of November 5, 2010 and as of February 2, 2012, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc., the subsidiaries of CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.4		Amendment No. 1 and Incremental Term Loan Assumption Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2015, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 10, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

10.5		Incremental Term Loan Assumption Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2015, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 18, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

10.6		Amendment No. 2, dated as of December 5, 2016, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 6, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

10.7		Contingent Value Rights Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and between Community Health Systems, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.8		Receivables Sale Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2012, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the originators party thereto and CHSPSC, LLC (formerly Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation), as Collection Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

10.9		Receivables Purchase and Contribution Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2012, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS Receivables Funding, LLC and CHSPSC, LLC (formerly Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation), as Collection Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

10.10		Receivables Loan Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2012, among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC (formerly Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation), as Collection Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

188


No.		Description
10.11		First Omnibus Amendment, dated July 30, 2012, to the Receivables Sale Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the originators party thereto and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, to the Receivables Purchase and Contribution Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS Receivables Funding, LLC and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, and to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed November 1, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

10.12		Second Omnibus Amendment, dated March 7, 2013, to the Receivables Sale Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the originators party thereto and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, to the Receivables Purchase and Contribution Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS Receivables Funding, LLC and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, and to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 8, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

10.13		Third Omnibus Amendment, dated March 31, 2014, to the Receivables Sale Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the originators party thereto and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, to the Receivables Purchase and Contribution Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS Receivables Funding, LLC and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, and to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 1, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.14		Fourth Amendment, dated August 29, 2014, to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 filed November 4, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.15		Fifth Amendment, dated February 28, 2015, to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 filed May 6, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

10.16		Fourth Omnibus Amendment, dated March 31, 2015, to the Receivables Sale Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the originators party thereto and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, to the Receivables Purchase and Contribution Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS Receivables Funding, LLC and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, and to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 1, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

189


No.		Description
10.17		Fifth Omnibus Amendment, dated November 13, 2015, to the Receivables Sale Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the originators party thereto and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, to the Receivables Purchase and Contribution Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS Receivables Funding, LLC and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, and to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 13, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

10.18		Sixth Omnibus Amendment, dated November 18, 2016, to the Receivables Sale Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the originators party thereto and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, to the Receivables Purchase and Contribution Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS Receivables Funding, LLC and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, and to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 21, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

10.19 *		Sixth Amendment, dated December 16 , 2016, to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012

10.20 †		Form of Indemnification Agreement between Community Health Systems, Inc. and its directors and executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed May 2, 2000 (No. 333-31790))

10.21 †		CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed February 27, 2009 (No. 001-15925))

10.22 †		Amendment No. 1, dated as of September 13, 2011, to the CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 filed October 28, 2011 (No. 001-15925))

10.23 †		Amendment No. 2, dated as of January 1, 2014, to the CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 filed May 7, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.24 †		Community Health Systems Supplemental Executive Benefits, amended and restated effective April 1, 2015(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, filed August 4, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

190


No.		Description
10.25 †		Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Trust, dated June 1, 2005, by and between CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., as grantor, and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 1, 2005 (No. 001-15925))

10.26 †		CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated effective January 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed February 26, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.27 †		Community Health Systems Deferred Compensation Plan Trust, amended and restated effective February 26, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 filed March 27, 2003 (No. 001-15925))

10.28 †		CHS NQDCP, effective as of September 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed December 11, 2009 (No. 333-163691))

10.29 †		CHS NQDCP Adoption Agreement, executed as of August 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed December 11, 2009 (No. 333-163691))

10.30 †		Guarantee, dated December 9, 2009, made by Community Health Systems, Inc. in favor of CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. with respect to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s payment obligations under the CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan and the NQDCP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed December 11, 2009 (No. 333-163691))

10.31 †		Community Health Systems, Inc. 2004 Employee Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of February 26, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 filed August 1, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.32 †		Community Health Systems, Inc. Directors’ Fees Deferral Plan, as amended and restated as of December 10, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed February 27, 2009 (No. 001-15925))

10.33 †		Community Health Systems, Inc. 2000 Stock Option and Award Plan, as amended and restated as of March 20, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 filed July 31, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

10.34 †		Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (Employee) for Community Health Systems, Inc. 2000 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed February 26, 2010 (No. 001-15925))

10.35 †		Community Health Systems, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan, as amended and restated as of March 16, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 19, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

10.36 †		Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (Employee) for Community Health Systems, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed February 26, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

191


No.		Description
10.37 †		Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Community Health Systems, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 filed July 31, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

10.38 †		Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Most Highly Compensated Executive Officers) for Community Health Systems, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan (for awards granted from January 1, 2014 through February 29, 2016)(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 filed July 31, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

10.39 †		Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Most Highly Compensated Executive Officers) for Community Health Systems, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan (for awards granted from March 1, 2016 through February 28, 2017)(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed May 3, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

10.40 †		Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Special Purpose) for Community Health Systems, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 filed May 7, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.41 †		Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Community Health Systems, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 filed July 31, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

10.42 †		Form of Amended and Restated Change in Control Severance Agreement effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed February 27, 2009 (No. 001-15925))

10.43 †		Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement (for executive officers appointed since January 1, 2009) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 filed May 7, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.44		Participation Agreement entered into as of January 1, 2005, by and between Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation and HealthTrust Purchasing Group, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 7, 2005 (No. 001-15925))

10.45		Amendment effective as of January 1, 2015, by and between CHSPSC, LLC and HealthTrust Purchasing Group, L.P., to Participation Agreement entered into as of January 1, 2005, by and between Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation and HealthTrust Purchasing Group, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed February 25, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

10.46 †		Consultancy Agreement, dated December 31, 2016, by and between CHSPSC, LLC and David L. Miller (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 3, 2017 (No. 001-15925))

192


No.			Description
	12 *		Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

	21 *		List of Subsidiaries

	23.1 *		Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP

	31.1 *		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	31.2 *		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	32.1 *		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	32.2 *		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	99.1		Corporate Integrity Agreement, dated July 28, 2014, between Community Health Systems, Inc. and the Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (incorporated by referent to Exhibit 99.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 filed November 4, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

	99.2 *		Order Approving Derivative Settlement and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice, dated January 17, 2017 and Stipulation of Settlement, dated November 18, 2016

	101.INS	*	XBRL Instance Document

	101.SCH	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

	101.CAL	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

	101.DEF	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

	101.LAB	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

	101.PRE	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

*	Filed herewith.

†	Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

193

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

By:		/s/ Wayne T. Smith
		Wayne T. Smith
		Chairman of the Board
		and Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 21, 2017

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Name	Title	Date
/s/ WAYNE T. SMITH Wayne T. Smith	Chief Executive Officer and Director (principal executive officer)	February 21, 2017

/s/ W. LARRY CASH W. Larry Cash	President of Financial Services, Chief Financial Officer and Director (principal financial officer)	February 21, 2017

/s/ KEVIN J. HAMMONS Kevin J. Hammons	Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (principal accounting officer)	February 21, 2017

/s/ JOHN A. CLERICO John A. Clerico	Director	February 21, 2017

/s/ JAMES S. ELY III James S. Ely III	Director	February 21, 2017

/s/ JOHN A. FRY John A. Fry	Director	February 21, 2017

/s/ WILLIAM NORRIS JENNINGS, M.D. William Norris Jennings, M.D.	Director	February 21, 2017

/s/ JULIA B. NORTH Julia B. North	Director	February 21, 2017

/s/ H. MITCHELL WATSON, JR. H. Mitchell Watson, Jr.	Director	February 21, 2017

/s/ H. JAMES WILLIAMS, PH.D. H. James Williams, Ph.D.	Director	February 21, 2017

194

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Community Health Systems, Inc.

Franklin, Tennessee

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Community Health Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, and have issued our reports thereon dated February 21, 2017; such reports are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of the Company listed in Item 15. This consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Nashville, Tennessee

February 21, 2017

195

Community Health Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts


Description	Balance at Beginning of Year		Acquisitions and Dispositions			Charged to Costs and Expenses		Write-offs			Balance at End of Year
	(In millions)
Year ended December 31, 2016 allowance for doubtful accounts	$	4,110	$	(365	)	$	2,849	$	(2,821	)	$	3,773
Year ended December 31, 2015 allowance for doubtful accounts	$	3,504	$	(17	)	$	3,168	$	(2,545	)	$	4,110
Year ended December 31, 2014 allowance for doubtful accounts	$	2,438	$	960		$	3,022	$	(2,916	)	$	3,504

196

Exhibit Index


No.		Description
	2.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 29, 2013, by and among Health Management Associates, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc. and FWCT-2 Acquisition Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 30, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

	2.2	Amendment and Consent to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 24, 2013, by and among Health Management Associates, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc. and FWCT-2 Acquisition Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 25, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

	2.3	Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated April 29, 2016, by and between Community Health Systems, Inc. and Quorum Health Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

	2.4	Tax Matters Agreement, dated April 29, 2016, by and between Community Health Systems, Inc. and Quorum Health Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

	2.5	Employee Matters Agreement, dated April 29, 2016, by and between Community Health Systems, Inc. and Quorum Health Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

	2.6	Amendment to the Employee Matters Agreement, effective as of April 29, 2016, by and between Community Health Systems, Inc. and Quorum Health Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

	3.1	Form of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Community Health Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed June 8, 2000 (No. 333-31790))

	3.2	Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Community Health Systems, Inc., dated May 18, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 20, 2010 (No. 001-15925))

	3.3	Amended and Restated By-laws of Community Health Systems, Inc. (as of December 7, 2016) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 12, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

	4.1	Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 filed May 7, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

	4.2	Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2016, between Community Health Systems, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as Rights Agent, including as Exhibit A the forms of Rights Certificate and of Election to Exercise and as Exhibit B the Form of Certificate of Designation and Terms of Participating Preferred Stock of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 3, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

197


No.		Description
4.3		Senior Notes Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of November 22, 2011, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the Guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed February 23, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.4		Form of 8.000% Senior Note due 2019 (included in Exhibit 4.3)

4.5		Registration Rights Agreement relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of November 22, 2011, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the Guarantors party thereto and the Initial Purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed February 23, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.6		First Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of January 31, 2012, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.35 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-4/A filed April 2, 2012 (No. 333-180265))

4.7		Second Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of March 31, 2012, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.36 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-4/A filed April 2, 2012 (No. 333-180265))

4.8		Third Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of May 15, 2012, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 18, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.9		Fourth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of September 30, 2012, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed November 1, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.10		Fifth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of March 31, 2013, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 filed April 30, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

4.11		Sixth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of September 30, 2013, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 filed October 31, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

4.12		Seventh Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of February 12, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed February 26, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

198


No.		Description
4.13		Eighth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of June 30, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 filed August 1, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.14		Ninth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of December 1, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed February 25, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.15		Tenth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of March 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 filed May 6, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.16		Eleventh Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 filed August 4, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.17		Twelfth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of September 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed November 3, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.18		Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of December 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed February 17, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.19		Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of March 31, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed May 3, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.20		Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 8.000% Senior Notes due 2019, dated as of September 30, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 filed November 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

199


No.		Description
4.21		Senior Notes Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of July 18, 2012, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the Guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 18, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.22		Form of 7.125% Senior Note due 2020 (included in Exhibit 4.21)

4.23		First Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of September 30, 2012, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed November 1, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.24		Second Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of March 31, 2013, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 filed April 30, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

4.25		Third Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of September 30, 2013, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 filed October 31, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

4.26		Fourth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of February 12, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed February 26, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.27		Fifth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of June 30, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 filed August 1, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.28		Sixth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of December 1, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.23 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed February 25, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.29		Seventh Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of March 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 filed May 6, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.30		Eighth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 filed August 4, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

200


No.		Description
4.31		Ninth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of September 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed November 3, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.32		Tenth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of December 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.29 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed February 17, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.33		Eleventh Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of March 31, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed May 3, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.34		Twelfth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of September 30, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30 , 2016 filed November 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.35		Senior Secured Notes Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of August 17, 2012, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the Guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 20, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.36		Form of 5.125% Senior Secured Note due 2018 (included in Exhibit 4.35)

4.37		First Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of September 30, 2012, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed November 1, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.38		Second Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of March 31, 2013, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 filed April 30, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

4.39		Third Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of September 30, 2013, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 filed October 31, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

4.40		Fourth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of February 12, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.26 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed February 26, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

201


No.		Description
4.41		Fifth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of June 30, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 filed August 1, 2014 (No. 001-15925))
4.42		Sixth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of December 1, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.32 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed February 25, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.43		Seventh Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of March 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 filed May 6, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.44		Eighth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 filed August 4, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.45		Ninth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of September 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed November 3, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.46		Tenth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of December 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.41 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed February 17, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.47		Eleventh Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of March 31, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed May 3, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.48		Twelfth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, dated as of September 30, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 filed November 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

202


No.		Description
4.49		Amendment No. 1 and Reaffirmation Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2012, relating to the Amended and Restated Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2007, as amended and restated as of November 5, 2010, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed November 1, 2012 (No. 001-15925))
4.50		First Lien Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2012, among Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent, Credit Suisse AG, as authorized representative, Regions Bank, as Trustee and authorized representative, and the additional authorized representatives party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed November 1, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.51		Copyright Security Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2012, among Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS Washington Holdings, LLC, Northwest Hospital, LLC, Quorum Health Resources, LLC, and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed November 1, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.52		Trademark Security Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2012, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Blue Island Hospital Company, LLC, CHS Washington Holdings, LLC, Quorum Health Resources, LLC, Triad Healthcare Corporation, Youngstown Ohio Hospital Company, LLC, and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed November 1, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

4.53		Senior Secured Notes Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and among FWCT-2 Escrow Corporation, Regions Bank, as Trustee, and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.54		Form of 5.125% Senior Secured Note due 2021 (included in Exhibit 4.53)

4.55		First Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee, and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.56		Second Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of June 30, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 filed August 1, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.57		Third Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of December 1, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.41 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed February 25, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

203


No.		Description
4.58		Fourth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of March 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 filed May 6, 2015 (No. 001-15925))
4.59		Fifth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 filed August 4, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.60		Sixth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of September 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed November 3, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.61		Seventh Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of December 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.54 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed February 17, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.62		Eighth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of March 31, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed May 3, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.63		Ninth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, dated as of September 30, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, Regions Bank, as Trustee and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 filed November 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.64		Senior Notes Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and among FWCT-2 Escrow Corporation and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.65		Form of 6.875% Senior Note due 2022 (included in Exhibit 4.64)

4.66		First Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

204


No.		Description
4.67		Second Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of June 30, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 filed August 1, 2014 (No. 001-15925))
4.68		Third Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of December 1, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.46 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed February 25, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.69		Fourth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of March 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 filed May 6, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.70		Fifth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 filed August 4, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.71		Sixth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of September 30, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed November 3, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

4.72		Seventh Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of December 31, 2015, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.63 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed February 17, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.73		Eighth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of March 31, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed May 3, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.74		Ninth Supplemental Indenture relating to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of September 30, 2016, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Regions Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 filed November 2, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

4.75		Secured Notes Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and among FWCT-2 Escrow Corporation, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, each as a representative of the initial purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

205


No.		Description
4.76		Unsecured Notes Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and among FWCT-2 Escrow Corporation, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, each as a representative of the initial purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))
4.77		Secured Notes Registration Rights Agreement Joinder, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the subsidiaries party thereto, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, each as a representative of the initial purchasers thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

4.78		Unsecured Notes Registration Rights Agreement Joinder, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the subsidiaries party thereto, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, each as a representative of the initial purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.1		Amended and Restated Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2007, as amended and restated as of November 5, 2010, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc., the subsidiaries of CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. from time to time party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 9, 2010 (No. 001-15925))

10.2		Third Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2014, to the Credit Agreement dated as of July 25, 2007, as amended and restated as of November 5, 2010 and as of February 2, 2012, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc., the subsidiaries of CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.3		Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2014, to the Credit Agreement dated as of July 25, 2007, as amended and restated as of November 5, 2010 and as of February 2, 2012, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc., the subsidiaries of CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.4		Amendment No. 1 and Incremental Term Loan Assumption Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2015, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 10, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

10.5		Incremental Term Loan Assumption Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2015, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 18, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

206


No.		Description
10.6		Amendment No. 2, dated as of December 5, 2016, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., Community Health Systems, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 6, 2016 (No. 001-15925))
10.7		Contingent Value Rights Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2014, by and between Community Health Systems, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.8		Receivables Sale Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2012, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the originators party thereto and CHSPSC, LLC (formerly Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation), as Collection Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

10.9		Receivables Purchase and Contribution Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2012, among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS Receivables Funding, LLC and CHSPSC, LLC (formerly Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation), as Collection Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

10.10		Receivables Loan Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2012, among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC (formerly Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation), as Collection Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

10.11		First Omnibus Amendment, dated July 30, 2012, to the Receivables Sale Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the originators party thereto and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, to the Receivables Purchase and Contribution Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS Receivables Funding, LLC and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, and to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed November 1, 2012 (No. 001-15925))

10.12		Second Omnibus Amendment, dated March 7, 2013, to the Receivables Sale Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the originators party thereto and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, to the Receivables Purchase and Contribution Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS Receivables Funding, LLC and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, and to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 8, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

207


No.		Description
10.13		Third Omnibus Amendment, dated March 31, 2014, to the Receivables Sale Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the originators party thereto and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, to the Receivables Purchase and Contribution Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS Receivables Funding, LLC and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, and to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 1, 2014 (No. 001-15925))
10.14		Fourth Amendment, dated August 29, 2014, to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 filed November 4, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.15		Fifth Amendment, dated February 28, 2015, to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 filed May 6, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

10.16		Fourth Omnibus Amendment, dated March 31, 2015, to the Receivables Sale Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the originators party thereto and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, to the Receivables Purchase and Contribution Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS Receivables Funding, LLC and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, and to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 1, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

10.17		Fifth Omnibus Amendment, dated November 13, 2015, to the Receivables Sale Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the originators party thereto and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, to the Receivables Purchase and Contribution Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS Receivables Funding, LLC and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, and to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 13, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

10.18		Sixth Omnibus Amendment, dated November 18, 2016, to the Receivables Sale Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., the originators party thereto and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, to the Receivables Purchase and Contribution Agreement among CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., CHS Receivables Funding, LLC and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, and to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 21, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

208


No.		Description
10.19 *		Sixth Amendment, dated December 16 , 2016, to the Receivables Loan Agreement among CHS Receivables Funding, LLC, the lenders party thereto, the managing agents party thereto, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent, and CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent, all dated as of March 21, 2012

10.20 †		Form of Indemnification Agreement between Community Health Systems, Inc. and its directors and executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed May 2, 2000 (No. 333-31790))
10.21 †		CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed February 27, 2009 (No. 001-15925))

10.22 †		Amendment No. 1, dated as of September 13, 2011, to the CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 filed October 28, 2011 (No. 001-15925))

10.23 †		Amendment No. 2, dated as of January 1, 2014, to the CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 filed May 7, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.24 †		Community Health Systems Supplemental Executive Benefits, amended and restated effective April 1, 2015(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, filed August 4, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

10.25 †		Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Trust, dated June 1, 2005, by and between CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., as grantor, and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 1, 2005 (No. 001-15925))

10.26 †		CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated effective January 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed February 26, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.27 †		Community Health Systems Deferred Compensation Plan Trust, amended and restated effective February 26, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 filed March 27, 2003 (No. 001-15925))

10.28 †		CHS NQDCP, effective as of September 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed December 11, 2009 (No. 333-163691))

10.29 †		CHS NQDCP Adoption Agreement, executed as of August 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed December 11, 2009 (No. 333-163691))

209


No.		Description
10.30 †		Guarantee, dated December 9, 2009, made by Community Health Systems, Inc. in favor of CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. with respect to CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.’s payment obligations under the CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan and the NQDCP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed December 11, 2009 (No. 333-163691))

10.31 †		Community Health Systems, Inc. 2004 Employee Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of February 26, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 filed August 1, 2014 (No. 001-15925))
10.32 †		Community Health Systems, Inc. Directors’ Fees Deferral Plan, as amended and restated as of December 10, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed February 27, 2009 (No. 001-15925))

10.33 †		Community Health Systems, Inc. 2000 Stock Option and Award Plan, as amended and restated as of March 20, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 filed July 31, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

10.34 †		Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (Employee) for Community Health Systems, Inc. 2000 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed February 26, 2010 (No. 001-15925))

10.35 †		Community Health Systems, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan, as amended and restated as of March 16, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 19, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

10.36 †		Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (Employee) for Community Health Systems, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed February 26, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.37 †		Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Community Health Systems, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 filed July 31, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

10.38 †		Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Most Highly Compensated Executive Officers) for Community Health Systems, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan (for awards granted from January 1, 2014 through February 29, 2016)(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 filed July 31, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

10.39 †		Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Most Highly Compensated Executive Officers) for Community Health Systems, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan (for awards granted from March 1, 2016 through February 28, 2017)(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed May 3, 2016 (No. 001-15925))

10.40 †		Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Special Purpose) for Community Health Systems, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 filed May 7, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

210


No.		Description
10.41 †		Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Community Health Systems, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 filed July 31, 2013 (No. 001-15925))

10.42 †		Form of Amended and Restated Change in Control Severance Agreement effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed February 27, 2009 (No. 001-15925))
10.43 †		Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement (for executive officers appointed since January 1, 2009) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 filed May 7, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

10.44		Participation Agreement entered into as of January 1, 2005, by and between Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation and HealthTrust Purchasing Group, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 7, 2005 (No. 001-15925))

10.45		Amendment effective as of January 1, 2015, by and between CHSPSC, LLC and HealthTrust Purchasing Group, L.P., to Participation Agreement entered into as of January 1, 2005, by and between Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation and HealthTrust Purchasing Group, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed February 25, 2015 (No. 001-15925))

10.46 †		Consultancy Agreement, dated December 31, 2016, by and between CHSPSC, LLC and David L. Miller (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 3, 2017 (No. 001-15925))

12 *		Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

21 *		List of Subsidiaries

23.1 *		Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP

31.1 *		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2 *		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1 *		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2 *		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

99.1		Corporate Integrity Agreement, dated July 28, 2014, between Community Health Systems, Inc. and the Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (incorporated by referent to Exhibit 99.1 to Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 filed November 4, 2014 (No. 001-15925))

99.2 *		Order Approving Derivative Settlement and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice, dated January 17, 2017 and Stipulation of Settlement, dated November 18, 2016

211


No.			Description
	101.INS	*	XBRL Instance Document

	101.SCH	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

	101.CAL	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

	101.DEF	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

	101.LAB	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

	101.PRE	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

*	Filed herewith

†	Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

212

EX-10.19

Exhibit 10.19

SIXTH AMENDMENT TO RECEIVABLES LOAN AGREEMENT

This SIXTH AMENDMENT TO RECEIVABLES LOAN AGREEMENT is made as of December 16, 2016 (this “Amendment”), among CHS RECEIVABLES FUNDING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Receivables Funding”), as Borrower, THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA (“Scotia”), as a Committed Lender and as a Managing Agent, CRÉDIT AGRICOLE CORPORATE AND INVESTMENT BANK (“CA-CIB”), as a Committed Lender, as a Managing Agent and as Administrative Agent, THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD. (“BTMU”), as a Committed Lender and as a Managing Agent, ATLANTIC ASSET SECURITIZATION LLC (“Atlantic”), as a Conduit Lender, LIBERTY STREET FUNDING LLC (“Liberty Street”), as a Conduit Lender, VICTORY RECEIVABLES CORPORATION (“Victory”), as a Conduit Lender, and CHSPSC, LLC (as successor-by-conversion to Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation), a Delaware limited liability company (“Professional Services”), as Collection Agent under the Receivables Loan Agreement, and is acknowledged and agreed by Receivables Funding, as the Company, Professional Services, as Collection Agent under each of the Contribution Agreement and the Sale Agreement, and as Authorized Representative (as defined in the Sale Agreement, the “Authorized Representative”), CHS/COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation (“CHS”), as Transferor, as Buyer and individually (as the provider of a performance undertaking), and EACH OF THE OTHER PERSONS IDENTIFIED AS ORIGINATORS ON THE SIGNATURE PAGES HERETO AFFILIATED WITH CHS/COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., as Originators. All capitalized terms used herein without reference shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Receivables Loan Agreement (as defined below) after giving effect to this Amendment.

WHEREAS, Receivables Funding, as Borrower, Scotia, as a Committed Lender and as a Managing Agent, CA-CIB, as a Committed Lender, as a Managing Agent and as Administrative Agent, BTMU, as a Committed Lender and as a Managing Agent, the other Lenders party thereto and Professional Services, as Collection Agent, have entered into the Receivables Loan Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2012 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified prior to the date hereof, the “Receivables Loan Agreement”);

WHEREAS, CHS, as Transferor, Receivables Funding, as the Company, and Professional Services, as Collection Agent thereunder, have entered into the Receivables Purchase and Contribution Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2012 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified prior to the date hereof, the “Contribution Agreement”);

WHEREAS, the Originators, Professional Services, as Collection Agent and Authorized Representative thereunder, and CHS, as Buyer, have entered into the Receivables Sale Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2012 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified prior to the date hereof, the “Sale Agreement”);

WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend certain provisions of the Receivables Loan Agreement pursuant to Section 10.01 of the Receivables Loan Agreement, Section 9.01 of the Contribution Agreement, and Section 9.01 of the Sale Agreement and take the other actions set forth herein, and have agreed to do so subject to the terms and conditions of this Amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements hereinafter set forth, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

SECTION 1. Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement. Subject to all of the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment effective as of the Effective Date (as defined below), the Receivables Loan Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

(a) Section 1.01 of the Receivables Loan Agreement is amended by inserting the following definitions in the appropriate alphabetical order:

“Consent Fee Letter” means that certain fee letter dated as of the Sixth Amendment Effective Date, by and among the Borrower, each Managing Agent and the Administrative Agent.

“Sixth Amendment Effective Date” means December 16, 2016.

(b) Section 2.06 of the Receivables Loan Agreement is amended by adding a new clause (l) to the end thereof to read as follows:

(l) On the Sixth Amendment Effective Date, the Borrower shall pay to the Administrative Agent for its own benefit and the benefit of each Managing Agent and each Lender, as applicable, the fees set forth in the Consent Fee Letter that are due and payable on such date.

(r) CHS or any subsidiary thereof shall fail to perform or observe any term, covenant or agreement contained in (i) Section 6.12 or Section 6.13 of the Parent Credit Agreement as in effect on the Sixth Amendment Effective Date or (ii) Section 6.12 or Section 6.13 of the Parent Credit Agreement as in effect from time to time thereafter, in each case, without regard to any waiver or modification to any of those provisions or any of the defined terms used therein and such failure shall continue for a period of 10 Business Days after the date on which financial statements are required to be delivered with respect to the applicable fiscal quarter hereunder (the “Financial Covenant Cure Period”); or

(d) The second paragraph of Section 7.01 is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Article VII, during the Financial Covenant Cure Period and in addition to the Borrower’s rights under Section 2.04(d), the Parent may issue Qualified Capital Stock (as defined in the Parent Credit Agreement) and elect to treat all or any portion of the net cash proceeds thereof as having

increased Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Parent Credit Agreement) with respect to such applicable quarter solely for the purpose of determining actual and pro forma compliance with Section 6.12 or Section 6.13 of the Parent Credit Agreement whether as in effect on the Sixth Amendment Effective Date or as in effect from time to time thereafter for purposes of Section 7.01(r) at the end of such applicable quarter and applicable subsequent periods, provided that (a) such proceeds (i) are actually received by the Parent and contributed to CHS no later than ten days after the date on which financial statements are required to be delivered with respect to such fiscal quarter hereunder and (ii) do not exceed the aggregate amount necessary to cause Parent to be in compliance with the covenants under Section 6.12 or Section 6.13 of the Parent Credit Agreement whether as in effect on the Sixth Amendment Effective Date or as in effect from time to time thereafter for purposes of Section 7.01(r) for any applicable period and (b) in each period of four fiscal quarters, there shall be at least two fiscal quarters in which no such right to cure permitted by this paragraph is utilized.

SECTION 2. Conditions to Effectiveness. This Amendment shall become effective upon the date on which the following conditions have been satisfied (with respect to documentary conditions, in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the Administrative Agent) (such date, the “Effective Date”):

(a) The Administrative Agent shall have received counterparts of (i) this Amendment duly executed by each of the Borrower, the Collection Agent, the Managing Agents, the Committed Lenders, the Conduit Lenders and the Administrative Agent and counterparts evidencing acknowledgment and agreement duly executed by each of the Company, the Collection Agent (as Collection Agent under each of the Contribution Agreement and the Sale Agreement), the Authorized Representative, the Transferor, the Buyer, CHS individually and the Originators and (ii) the Consent Fee Letter duly executed by each of the Borrower, the Collection Agent, the Managing Agents, the Committed Lenders, the Conduit Lenders and the Administrative Agent.

(b) All fees and expenses required to be paid prior to an Advance under the Receivables Loan Agreement (as amended by this Amendment) pursuant to (i) the Receivables Loan Agreement (as amended by this Amendment) and (ii) the Consent Fee Letter shall have been paid.

(c) Each Managing Agent and the Administrative Agent shall have completed satisfactory due diligence and obtained the requisite credit approvals.

SECTION 3. Representations and Warranties.

(a) Each of the Borrower and the Collection Agent represents and warrants as of the date hereof that (i) it has taken all necessary action to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this Amendment and the performance of the Receivables Loan Agreement and the other Facility Documents, each as amended hereby, as applicable, and (ii) no consent, approval, authorization or order of, or filing, registration or qualification with, any court or governmental authority or third party is required in connection with the execution, delivery or performance by such Person of this Amendment other than such as has been met or obtained and are in full force and effect.

(b) Each of the Borrower and the Collection Agent represents and warrants as of the date hereof that each of this Amendment and each Facility Document (as amended by this Amendment or otherwise as of the date hereof, as applicable) constitutes such Person’s legal, valid and binding obligation, enforceable against such person in accordance with its terms, except as such enforceability may be subject to (A) bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, fraudulent conveyance or transfer, moratorium or similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and (B) general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding at law or in equity).

(c) The Borrower hereby makes each of the representations and warranties contained in Sections 4.01 and 4.03 of the Receivables Loan Agreement as of the date hereof, in each case after giving effect to this Amendment, except for those representations and warranties that refer to specific dates, which are made as of the dates indicated therein.

(d) The Collection Agent hereby makes each of the representations and warranties contained in Section 4.02 of the Receivables Loan Agreement as of the date hereof, in each case after giving effect to this Amendment, except for those representations and warranties that refer to specific dates, which are made as of the dates indicated therein.

(e) Each of the Borrower and the Collection Agent further represents and warrants that, both before and after giving effect to this Amendment, no event has occurred and is continuing which constitutes an Event of Default, or would, with the passage of time or the giving of notice, constitute an Event of Default.

SECTION 4. Facility Document. This Amendment shall constitute a Facility Document under the terms of the Receivables Loan Agreement as amended hereby.

SECTION 5. Further Assurances. The Borrower and the Collection Agent agree to promptly take such action, upon the reasonable request of the Administrative Agent, as is necessary to carry out the intent of this Amendment.

SECTION 6. Confirmation of Agreement. On and after the date hereof, all references to the Receivables Loan Agreement in the Facility Documents and the other documents and instruments delivered pursuant to or in connection with such Facility Documents shall mean the Receivables Loan Agreement as amended by this Amendment, and as hereafter modified, amended or restated in accordance with its terms. Except as herein expressly amended, the Receivables Loan Agreement is ratified and confirmed in all respects and shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

SECTION 7. Confirmation of Undertaking. CHS, as undertaking party under the Collection Agent Performance Undertaking, dated as of March 21, 2012 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified prior to the date hereof, the “Performance Undertaking”), in favor of CA-CIB as administrative agent on behalf of the Lenders, hereby consents to the amendment to the Receivables Loan Agreement set forth in Section 1 of this Amendment, and hereby confirms and agrees that, notwithstanding the effectiveness of this Amendment, the Performance Undertaking heretofore executed and delivered by it is, and shall continue to be, in

full force and effect in accordance with its terms and shall apply to the Receivables Loan Agreement (as amended by this Amendment), the Contribution Agreement and the Sale Agreement and the Performance Undertaking is hereby so ratified and confirmed.

SECTION 8. GOVERNING LAW. THIS AMENDMENT SHALL, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 5-1401 OF THE GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE NON-EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS SITTING IN NEW YORK COUNTY, NEW YORK IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AMENDMENT, ANY OTHER FACILITY DOCUMENT, ANY OTHER DOCUMENT DELIVERED PURSUANT HERETO OR THERETO, OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY OR THEREBY. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY WAIVES ANY OBJECTION BASED ON FORUM NON CONVENIENS THE MAINTENANCE OF ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING AND CONSENTS TO THE GRANTING OF SUCH LEGAL OR EQUITABLE RELIEF AS IS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY SUCH COURT.

SECTION 9. Execution in Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page to this Amendment by facsimile or by electronic mail in portable document format (pdf) shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Amendment.

SECTION 10. Severability of Provisions. Any provision of this Amendment which is prohibited or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof or affecting the validity or enforceability of such provision in any other jurisdiction.

SECTION 11. Headings. Section headings used herein are for convenience of reference only, are not part of this Amendment and shall not affect the construction of, or be taken into consideration in interpreting, this Amendment.

[Signature Pages Follow]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed as of the date first written above.


CHS RECEIVABLES FUNDING, LLC, as Borrower

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

CHS Receivables Funding, LLC 4000 Meridian Boulevard Franklin, Tennessee 37067 Attention: Rachel A. Seifert Telephone No: (615) 465-7000 Facsimile No: (615) 373-9704 Email: rachel_seifert@chs.net

CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent under the Receivables Loan Agreement

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

CHSPSC, LLC
4000 Meridian Boulevard Franklin, Tennessee 37067 Attention: Rachel A. Seifert Telephone No: (615) 465-7000 Facsimile No: (615) 373-9704 Email: rachel_seifert@chs.net

Signature Page to Sixth Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement


CRÉDIT AGRICOLE CORPORATE AND INVESTMENT BANK, as Administrative Agent, as a Managing Agent and as a Committed Lender

By:	/s/ Kostantina Kourmpetis
	Name:	Kostantina Kourmpetis
	Title:	Managing Director

By:	/s/ Michael Regan
	Name:	Michael Regan
	Title:	Managing Director

Crédit Agricole CIB 1301 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019 Attention: Sunny Gulrajani Telephone No: (212) 261-7845 Facsimile No: (917) 849-5584 Email: sunny.gulrajani@ca-cib.com

ATLANTIC ASSET SECURITIZATION LLC, as a Conduit Lender

By:	CRÉDIT AGRICOLE CORPORATE AND INVESTMENT BANK, as attorney-in-fact

By:	/s/ Kostantina Kourmpetis
	Name:	Kostantina Kourmpetis
	Title:	Managing Director

By:	/s/ Michael Regan
	Name:	Michael Regan
	Title:	Managing Director

Atlantic Asset Securitization c/o Crédit Agricole CIB 1301 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019 Attention: Sunny Gulrajani Telephone No: (212) 261-7845 Facsimile No: (917) 849-5584 Email: sunny.gulrajani@ca-cib.com

Signature Page to Sixth Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement


THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, as a Managing Agent and as a Committed Lender

By:	/s/ Michelle C. Phillips
	Name:	Michelle C. Phillips
	Title:	Director and Execution Head

LIBERTY STREET FUNDING LLC, as a Conduit Lender

By:
	Name:
	Title:

Signature Page to Sixth Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement


THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, as a Managing Agent and as a Committed Lender

By:
	Name:
	Title:

LIBERTY STREET FUNDING LLC, as a Conduit Lender

By:	/s/ Jill A. Russo
	Name:	Jill A. Russo
	Title:	Vice President

Signature Page to Sixth Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement


THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD., as a Managing Agent

By:	/s/ Christopher Pohl
	Name:	Christopher Pohl
	Title:	Managing Director

THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD., as a Committed Lender

By:	/s/ Christopher Pohl
	Name:	Christopher Pohl
	Title:	Managing Director

VICTORY RECEIVABLES CORPORATION, as a Conduit Lender

By:	/s/ David V. DeAngelis
	Name:	David V. DeAngelis
	Title:	Vice President

Signature Page to Sixth Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:


CHS RECEIVABLES FUNDING, LLC, as Company

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

CHS Receivables Funding, LLC 4000 Meridian Boulevard Franklin, Tennessee 37067 Attention: Rachel A. Seifert Telephone No: (615) 465-7000 Facsimile No: (615) 373-9704 Email: rachel_seifert@chs.net

CHSPSC, LLC, as Collection Agent under each of the Contribution Agreement and the Sale Agreement and as Authorized Representative

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

CHSPSC, LLC 4000 Meridian Boulevard Franklin, Tennessee 37067 Attention: Rachel A. Seifert Telephone No: (615) 465-7000 Facsimile No: (615) 373-9704 Email: rachel_seifert@chs.net

Signature Page to Sixth Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:


CHS/COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., as Transferor, as Buyer and individually

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

Signature Page to Sixth Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:


ORIGINATORS:

AFFINITY HOSPITAL, LLC BERWICK HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC BLUEFIELD HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC BLUFFTON HEALTH SYSTEM LLC BULLHEAD CITY HOSPITAL CORPORATION CARLSBAD MEDICAL CENTER, LLC CLEVELAND TENNESSEE HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC COATESVILLE HOSPITAL CORPORATION CRESTVIEW HOSPITAL CORPORATION DEACONESS HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC DUKES HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC DYERSBURG HOSPITAL CORPORATION EMPORIA HOSPITAL CORPORATION FOLEY HOSPITAL CORPORATION FRANKLIN HOSPITAL CORPORATION GADSDEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC GRANBURY HOSPITAL CORPORATION GREENBRIER VMC, LLC HOSPITAL OF MORRISTOWN, INC. JACKSON, TENNESSEE HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC JOURDANTON HOSPITAL CORPORATION KAY COUNTY OKLAHOMA HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC LAKE WALES HOSPITAL CORPORATION LANCASTER HOSPITAL CORPORATION LAS CRUCES MEDICAL CENTER, LLC LEA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LLC MARTIN HOSPITAL CORPORATION MARY BLACK HEALTH SYSTEM LLC MCSA, L.L.C. MOBERLY HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

Signature Page to Sixth Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement


ORIGINATORS (CONT.):

NATIONAL HEALTHCARE OF LEESVILLE, INC. NORTHAMPTON HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC NORTHWEST HOSPITAL, LLC ORO VALLEY HOSPITAL, LLC PETERSBURG HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC PHOENIXVILLE HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC POTTSTOWN HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC PORTER HOSPITAL, LLC QHG OF ENTERPRISE, INC. QHG OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. ROSWELL HOSPITAL CORPORATION RUSTON LOUISIANA HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC SCRANTON HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC SHELBYVILLE HOSPITAL CORPORATION SILOAM SPRINGS ARKANSAS HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC SPOKANE VALLEY WASHINGTON HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC SPOKANE WASHINGTON HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC ST. JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM LLC TOMBALL TEXAS HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC WARREN OHIO HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC WARREN OHIO REHAB HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC WARSAW HEALTH SYSTEM LLC WEATHERFORD TEXAS HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC WESLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC WEST GROVE HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC WILKES-BARRE HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC WOMEN & CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL, LLC YOUNGSTOWN OHIO HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

Signature Page to Sixth Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement


ORIGINATORS (CONT.):

KIRKSVILLE MISSOURI HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC LUTHERAN MUSCULOSKELETAL CENTER, LLC OAK HILL HOSPITAL CORPORATION SALEM HOSPITAL CORPORATION SCRANTON QUINCY HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC WOODWARD HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

Signature Page to Sixth Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement


ORIGINATORS (CONT.):

AMORY HMA, LLC ANNISTON HMA, LLC BILOXI H.M.A., LLC BRANDON HMA, LLC CAMPBELL COUNTY HMA, LLC CARLISLE HMA, LLC CHESTER HMA, LLC CITRUS HMA, LLC CLARKSDARE HMA, LLC CLINTON HMA, LLC COCKE COUNTY HMA, LLC DURANT H.M.A., LLC EAST GEORGIA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC FORT SMITH HMA, LLC HAINES CITY HMA, LLC HERNANDO HMA, LLC HMA FENTRESS COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL, LLC HMA SANTA ROSA MEDICAL CENTER, LLC JACKSON HMA, LLC JEFFERSON COUNTY HMA, LLC KEY WEST HMA, LLC LANCASTER HMA, LLC LEBANON HMA, LLC MADISON HMA, LLC MARSHALL COUNTY HMA, LLC MELBOURNE HMA, LLC METRO KNOXVILLE HMA, LLC MIDWEST REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

Signature Page to Sixth Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement


ORIGINATORS (CONT.):

NORTHWEST ARKANSAS HOSPITALS, LLC
PASCO REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC
POPLAR BLUFF REGIONAL MEDICAL
CENTER, LLC
PORT CHARLOTTE HMA, LLC
PUNTA GORDA HMA, LLC
RIVER OAKS HOSPITAL, LLC
ROCKLEDGE HMA, LLC
ROH, LLC
ROSE CITY HMA, LLC
SEBASTIAN HOSPITAL, LLC
SEBRING HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT
ASSOCIATES, LLC
SEMINOLE HMA, LLC
STATESVILLE HMA, LLC
TRIAD OF ALABAMA, LLC
TULLAHOMA HMA, LLC
TUNKHANNOCK HOSPITAL COMPANY LLC
VENICE HMA, LLC
VICKSBURG HEALTHCARE, LLC
YAKIMA HMA, LLC
YORK PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL
COMPANY, LLC

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

Signature Page to Sixth Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement


ORIGINATORS (CONT.):

BROWNWOOD HOSPITAL, L.P.
By:	Brownwood Medical Center, LLC
Its:	General Partner

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

COLLEGE STATION HOSPITAL, L.P.
By:	College Station Medical Center, LLC
Its:	General Partner

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

IOM HEALTH SYSTEM, L.P.
By:	Lutheran Health Network Investors, LLC
Its:	General Partner

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

Signature Page to Sixth Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement


ORIGINATORS (CONT.):

LAREDO TEXAS HOSPITAL COMPANY, L.P.
By:	Webb Hospital Corporation
Its:	General Partner

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

LONGVIEW MEDICAL CENTER, L.P.
By:	Regional Hospital of Longview, LLC
Its:	General Partner

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

NAVARRO HOSPITAL, L.P.
By:	Navarro Regional, LLC
Its:	General Partner

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

Signature Page to Sixth Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement


ORIGINATORS (CONT.):

PINEY WOODS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P.
By:	Woodland Heights Medical Center, LLC
Its:	General Partner

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

REHAB HOSPITAL OF FORT WAYNE GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
By:	Lutheran Health Network Investors, LLC
Its:	General Partner

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

SAN ANGELO HOSPITAL, L.P.
By:	San Angelo Community Medical Center, LLC
Its:	General Partner

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

VICTORIA OF TEXAS, L.P.
By:	Detar Hospital, LLC
Its:	General Partner

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

Signature Page to Sixth Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement


ORIGINATORS (CONT.):

ARMC, L.P.
By:	Triad-ARMC, LLC
Its:	General Partner

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

CRESTWOOD HEALTHCARE, L.P.
By:	Crestwood Hospital, LLC
Its:	General Partner

By:	/s/ Edward W. Lomicka
	Name:	Edward W. Lomicka
	Title:	Vice President and Treasurer

Signature Page to Sixth Amendment to Receivables Loan Agreement

EX-12

Exhibit 12

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)


	Year Ended December 31,

	2012				2013				2014				2015				2016
Earnings
Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income taxes	$	522			$	346			$	342			$	411			$	(1,715	)
Income from equity investees		(42	)			(43	)			(48	)			(63	)			(43	)
Distributed income from equity investees		32				59				29				64				40
Interest and amortization of deferred finance costs		621				613				972				973				962
Amortization of capitalized interest		4				4				4				5				9
Implicit rental interest expense		66				70				108				114				112


Total earnings	$	1,203			$	1,049			$	1,407			$	1,504			$	(635	)

Fixed Charges
Interest and amortization of deferred finance costs	$	621			$	613			$	972			$	973			$	962
Capitalized interest		24				10				10				16				9
Implicit rental interest expense		66				70				108				114				112


Total fixed charges	$	711			$	693			$	1,090			$	1,103			$	1,083

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges		1.69		x		1.51		x		1.29		x		1.36		x		*

* - For the year ended December 31, 2016, earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by approximately $1.7 billion.

EX-21

Exhibit 21

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING

(*) Majority position held in an entity with physicians, non-profit entities or both

(#) Minority position held in a non-consolidating entity


5300 Grand Limited Partnership* (OK)
A Woman’s Place, LLC (DE)
Abilene Clinic Asset Holding Company, LLC (DE)
Abilene Hospital, LLC (DE)
Abilene Merger, LLC (DE)
AF-CH-HH, LLC# (DE)
Affinity Cardio-Thoracic Specialists, LLC (DE)
Affinity Cardiovascular Specialists, LLC (DE)
Affinity Health Systems, LLC (DE)
Affinity Hospital, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Grandview Medical Center
Affinity Neurosurgical Specialists, LLC (DE)
Affinity Orthopedic Services, LLC (DE)
Affinity Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Affinity Skilled Nursing, LLC (DE)
Alabama HMA Physician Management, LLC (AL)
Alaska Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Alice Hospital, LLC (DE)
Alice Regional Hospital Community Alliance, Inc. (TX)
Alliance Health Partners, LLC (MS)		d/b/a Merit Health Batesville
Alliance Outpatient Imaging JV, LLC# (DE)
Ambulance Services of Dyersburg, Inc. (TN)
Ambulance Services of McNairy, Inc. (TN)
Amory HMA Physician Management, LLC (MS)
Amory HMA, LLC (MS)		d/b/a Merit Health Gilmore Memorial
Anesthesiology Group of Hattiesburg, LLC (DE)
Angelo Community Healthcare Services, Inc. (TX)
Anna Home Care Services, LLC (DE)
Anniston HMA, LLC* (AL)		d/b/a Stringfellow Memorial Hospital
APS Medical, LLC (DE)
Arizona ASC Management, Inc. (AZ)
Arizona DH, LLC (DE)
Arizona Medco, LLC (DE)
Arkansas HMA Regional Service Center, LLC (AR)
Arkansas Medical Imaging JV, LLC# (DE)
ARMC, LP (DE)		d/b/a Abilene Regional Medical Center
ASC JV Holdings, LLC (DE)
ASCOA JV, LLC* (DE)
Augusta HMA Physician Management, Inc. (GA)
Augusta HMA, Inc. (GA)
Augusta Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Barberton Health System, LLC (DE)
Barberton Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Bartow HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
Bartow HMA, LLC (FL)


Batesville HMA Development, LLC (MS)
Batesville HMA Medical Group, LLC* (MS)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Bayfront Ambulatory Surgical Center, LLC* (DE)
Bayfront Health Imaging Center, LLC* (DE)
Bayfront HMA Convenient Care, LLC* (FL)
Bayfront HMA Healthcare Holdings, LLC* (FL)
Bayfront HMA Home Health, LLC# (FL)
Bayfront HMA Investments, LLC* (FL)
Bayfront HMA Medical Center, LLC* (FL)		d/b/a Bayfront Health St. Petersburg
Bayfront HMA Physician Management, LLC* (FL)
Bayfront HMA Real Estate Holdings, LLC* (FL)
Bayfront HMA Wellness Center, LLC* (FL)
Beauco, LLC (DE)
Beaumont Medical Center, L.P. (DE)
Beaumont Regional, LLC (DE)
Berwick Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Berwick Clinic Corp. (PA)
Berwick Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Berwick Home Health Private Care, Inc. (PA)
Berwick Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Berwick Hospital Center
BH Trans Company, LLC (DE)
Big Bend Home Care Services, LLC (DE)
Biloxi H.M.A., LLC (MS)		d/b/a Merit Health Biloxi
Biloxi HMA Physician Management, LLC (MS)
Birmingham Holdings II, LLC (DE)
Birmingham Holdings, LLC (DE)
Birmingham Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Blackwell HMA, LLC (OK)
Blackwell HMPN, LLC (OK)
Blackwell Home Health & Hospice, LLC (OK)
Blue Island Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Bluefield Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Bluefield HBP Medical Group, LLC (DE)
Bluefield Holdings, LLC (DE)
Bluefield Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Bluefield Regional Medical Center
Bluffton Health System LLC (DE)		d/b/a Bluffton Regional Medical Center
Bluffton Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Boyertown Medical Services, L.P.# (PA)
Brandon HMA, LLC (MS)		d/b/a Merit Health Rankin
Brandon Physician Management, LLC (DE)
Brandywine Hospital Malpractice Assistance Fund, Inc. (PA)
Brazos Valley of Texas, L.P. (DE)
Brazos Valley Surgical Center, LLC (DE)
Brevard HMA ALF, LLC (FL)
Brevard HMA APO, LLC (FL)
Brevard HMA ASC, LLC (FL)
Brevard HMA Diagnostic Imaging, LLC (FL)
Brevard HMA HME, LLC (FL)
Brevard HMA Holdings, LLC (FL)
Brevard HMA Home Health, LLC# (FL)
Brevard HMA Hospice, LLC# (FL)
Brevard HMA Hospitals, LLC (FL)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Brevard HMA Investment Properties, LLC (FL)
Brevard HMA Nursing Home, LLC (FL)
Broken Arrow Medical Group, LLC (DE)
Brooklyn Medical Associates, LLC (IN)
Brooksville HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
Brownsville Clinic Corp. (TN)
Brownsville Hospital Corporation (TN)
Brownwood Asset Holding Company, LLC (DE)
Brownwood Hospital, L.P. (DE)		d/b/a Brownwood Regional Medical Center
Brownwood Medical Center, LLC (DE)
Bullhead City Clinic Corp. (AZ)
Bullhead City Hospital Corporation (AZ)		d/b/a Western Arizona Regional Medical Center
Bullhead City Hospital Investment Corporation (DE)
Bullhead City Imaging Corporation (AZ)
Byrd Medical Clinic, Inc. (LA)
Cahaba Orthopedics, LLC (DE)
Campbell County HMA, LLC (TN)		d/b/a LaFollette Medical Center
Canton HMA, LLC (MS)
Cardiology Associates of Spokane, LLC (DE)
Cardiology Associates of Tri-cities, LLC (DE)
Carlisle HMA Physician Management, LLC (PA)
Carlisle HMA Surgery Center, LLC (PA)
Carlisle HMA, LLC (PA)		d/b/a Carlisle Regional Medical Center
Carlisle Medical Group, LLC (PA)
Carlsbad Medical Center, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Carlsbad Medical Center
Carolina Surgery Center, LLC* (SC)
Carolinas Holdings, LLC (DE)
Carolinas Internal Medicine, LLC (DE)
Carolinas JV Holdings General, LLC (DE)
Carolinas JV Holdings II, LLC (DE)
Carolinas JV Holdings, L.P. (DE)
Carolinas Medical Alliance, Inc. (SC)
Carolinas OB/GYN Medical Group, LLC (DE)
CDI JV, LLC# (DE)
Cedar Park Clinic Asset Holding Company, LLC (DE)
Cedar Park Health System, L.P.* (DE)		d/b/a Cedar Park Regional Medical Center
Cedar Park Surgery Center, L.L.P.# (TX)
Center for Adult Healthcare, LLC (DE)
Center for Medical Interoperability, Inc.# (DE)
Central Florida HMA Holdings, LLC (DE)
Central Polk, LLC* (FL)
Central States HMA Holdings, LLC (DE)
Centre Home Care, LLC# (AL)
Chaves County New Mexico Hospital Company, LLC (DE)
Chester HMA Physician Management, LLC (SC)
Chester HMA, LLC (SC)		d/b/a Chester Regional Medical Center
Chester Medical Group, LLC (SC)
Chester PPM, LLC (SC)
Chesterton Surgery Center, LLC* (DE)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Chestnut Hill Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Chestnut Hill Health System, LLC (DE)
Chestnut Knoll Home Health Care, L.P.# (PA)
CHHS ALF Company, LLC (DE)
CHHS Development Company, LLC (DE)
CHHS Holdings, LLC (DE)
CHHS Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Chestnut Hill Hospital
CHHS Rehab Company, LLC (DE)
Children’s Mobile Team# (PA)
CHS Kentucky Holdings, LLC (DE)
CHS Mississippi State Political Action Committee (TN)
CHS Pennsylvania Holdings, LLC (DE)
CHS PSO, LLC (DE)
CHS Realty Holdings I, Inc. (TN)
CHS Realty Holdings II, Inc. (TN)
CHS Realty Holdings III, LLC (DE)
CHS Realty Holdings Joint Venture (TN)
CHS Receivables Funding, LLC (DE)
CHS Tennessee Holdings, LLC (DE)
CHS Virginia Holdings, LLC (DE)
CHS Washington Holdings, LLC (DE)
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. (DE)
CHS-ASC, LLC (DE)
CHSPSC Leasing, Inc. (DE)
CHSPSC, LLC (DE)
Citrus HMA, LLC (FL)		d/b/a Seven Rivers Regional Medical Center
Claremore Anesthesia, LLC (DE)
Claremore Internal Medicine, LLC (DE)
Claremore Physicians, LLC (DE)
Claremore Regional Hospital, LLC (DE)
Clarksdale HMA Physician Management, LLC (MS)
Clarksdale HMA, LLC (MS)		d/b/a Merit Health Northwest Mississippi
Clarksville Endoscopy Center, LLC* (DE)
Clarksville Health System, G.P.* (DE)		d/b/a Tennova Healthcare - Clarksville
Clarksville Holdings II, LLC (DE)
Clarksville Holdings, LLC (DE)
Clarksville Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Clarksville Imaging Center, LLC# (TN)
Clarksville Physician Services, G.P.* (DE)
Clarksville Surgicenter, LLC# (TN)
Cleveland Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Cleveland Hospital Company, LLC (TN)
Cleveland Medical Clinic, Inc. (TN)
Cleveland PHO, Inc. (TN)
Cleveland Tennessee Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Tennova Healthcare – Cleveland
Click to Care, LLC (FL)
Clinton County Health System, LLC (DE)
Clinton HMA, LLC (OK)		d/b/a AllianceHealth Clinton
Clinton HMPN, LLC (OK)
Clinton Home Health & Hospice LLC# (OK)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Coast Imaging, LLC# (MS)
Coatesville Cardiology Clinic, LLC (DE)
Coatesville Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Coatesville Hospital Corporation (PA)		d/b/a Brandywine Hospital
Cocke County HMA, LLC (TN)		d/b/a Newport Medical Center
Coffee Hospital Management Associates, Inc. (TN)
C-OK, LLC (DE)
College Station Clinic Asset Holding Company, LLC (DE)
College Station Diagnostic Clinic (TX)
College Station Hospital, L.P. (DE)		d/b/a College Station Medical Center
College Station Medical Center, LLC (DE)
College Station Merger, LLC (DE)
College Station RHC Company, LLC (DE)
Collier Boulevard HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
Collier HMA Facility Based Physician Management, LLC (FL)
Collier HMA Neurological Vascular Medical Group, LLC (FL)
Collier HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
Commonwealth CyberKnife, LLC# (DE)
Commonwealth Health Clinically Integrated Network, LLC (DE)
Commonwealth Health Urgent Care, LLC (DE)
Commonwealth Physician Network, LLC (DE)
Community GP Corp. (DE)
Community Health Care Partners, Inc. (MS)
Community Health Investment Company, LLC (DE)
Community Health Network, Inc. (AL)
Community Health Physicians Operations Holding Company, LLC (DE)
Community Health Systems Foundation (TN)
Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation Political Action Committee (TN)
Community Health Systems, Inc. (DE)
Community Information Network, Inc.
Community Insurance Group SPC, LTD. (Cayman Islands)
Community LP Corp. (DE)
Community Network Solutions, LLC (DE)
Compass Imaging, LLC (MS)
Consolidated Hospital Laundry Services, Inc.# (IN)
Coronado Medical, LLC (DE)
Coventry Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
CP Hospital GP, LLC (DE)
CPLP, LLC (DE)
Credentialing Verification Services, LLC (DE)
Crestview Hospital Corporation* (FL)		d/b/a North Okaloosa Medical Center
Crestview Professional Condominiums Association, Inc.* (FL)
Crestview Surgery Center, L.P. (TN)
Crestwood Healthcare, L.P. (DE)		d/b/a Crestwood Medical Center
Crestwood Hospital LP, LLC (DE)
Crestwood Hospital, LLC (DE)
Crestwood Physician Services, LLC (DE)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Crestwood Surgery Center, LLC* (DE)
Crossgates HMA Medical Group, LLC (MS)
Crossroads Healthcare Management, LLC# (TX)
Crossroads Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Crystal River HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
CS Surgery Center Holdings, LLC* (DE)
CSMC, LLC (DE)
CSP ASC Holdings, LLC* (DE)
Dallas Phy Service, LLC (DE)
Dallas Physician Practice, L.P. (DE)
Day Surgery, Inc. (KS)
DCF (TX)
Deaconess Health System, LLC* (OK)		d/b/a AllianceHealth Deaconess
Deaconess Holdings, LLC (DE)
Deaconess Hospital Holdings, LLC (DE)
Deaconess Metropolitan Physicians, LLC (DE)
Deaconess Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Deaconess Portland MOB Limited Partnership# (OK)
Deming Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Desert Hospital Holdings, LLC (DE)
Detar Hospital, LLC (DE)
DFW Physerv, LLC (DE)
DH Cardiology, LLC (DE)
DHFW Holdings, LLC (DE)
Diagnostic Clinic of Longview (TX)
Diagnostic Imaging Centers of NEPA, LLC# (PA)
Diagnostic Imaging Management of Brandywine Valley, LLC (PA)
Diagnostic Imaging of Brandywine Valley, LP (PA)
Doctors of Laredo, LLC (DE)
Dothan HBP Services, LLC (DE)
Dukes Health System, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Dukes Memorial Hospital
Dukes Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Dupont Hospital, LLC* (DE)		d/b/a Dupont Hospital
Durant H.M.A., LLC* (OK)		d/b/a AllianceHealth Durant
Durant HMA Home Health, LLC (OK)
Durant HMA Physician Management, LLC (OK)
Durant HMA Surgical Center, LLC* (OK)
Dyersburg Clinic Corp. (TN)
Dyersburg HBP Medical Group, LLC (DE)
Dyersburg Hospital Company, LLC (TN)		d/b/a Tennova Healthcare – Dyersburg Regional
E.D. Clinics, LLC (DE)
East Georgia HMA Physician Management, LLC (GA)
East Georgia Regional Medical Center, LLC* (GA)		d/b/a East Georgia Regional Medical Center
East Tennessee Clinic Corp. (TN)
East Tennessee Health Systems, Inc. (TN)
Easton Hospital Malpractice Assistance Fund, Inc. (PA)
Edge Medical Clinic, Inc. (AL)
El Dorado Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


El Dorado Surgery Center, L.P.* (DE)
EL MED, LLC (DE)
Eligibility Screening Services, LLC (DE)
Empire Health Services (WA)
Emporia Clinic Corp. (VA)
Emporia Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Emporia Hospital Corporation (VA)		d/b/a Southern Virginia Regional Medical Center
Enterprise Clinic, LLC (DE)
Eufaula Clinic Corp. (AL)
Eufaula Hospital Corporation (AL)
EverRad HMA Holdings, LLC (FL)
Fallbrook Home Care Services, LLC (DE)
Fallbrook Hospital Corporation (DE)
Family Home Care, Inc. (TN)
Fayetteville Arkansas Hospital Company, LLC* (DE)		d/b/a Northwest Health Physicians’ Specialty Hospital
First Choice Health Network, Inc.# (WA)
First Choice Health Plan of Mississippi, LLC# (MS)
Firstcare, Inc.# (IN)
Florence Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Florida Endoscopy and Surgery Center, LLC* (FL)
Florida HMA Holdings, LLC (DE)
Florida HMA Regional Service Center, LLC (FL)
Florida HMA Urgent Care, LLC (FL)
Florida Medical Imaging JV, LLC# (DE)
Florida West Coast Health Alliance, LLC* (DE)
Flowood River Oaks HMA Medical Group, LLC (MS)
Foley Clinic Corp. (AL)
Foley Home Health Corporation (AL)
Foley Hospital Corporation (AL)		d/b/a South Baldwin Regional Medical Center
Fort Payne Home Care, LLC# (AL)
Fort Smith HMA Home Health, LLC# (AR)
Fort Smith HMA PBC Management, LLC (AR)
Fort Smith HMA Physician Management, LLC (AR)
Fort Smith HMA, LLC (AR)		d/b/a Sparks Health System
Frankfort Health Partner, Inc. (IN)
Franklin Clinic Corp. (VA)
Franklin Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Franklin Hospital Corporation (VA)		d/b/a Southampton Memorial Hospital
Fresenius Vascular Care Petersburg, LLC# (DE)
Fulton Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Gadsden HMA Physician Management, LLC* (AL)
Gadsden Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Gadsden Regional Medical Center, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Gadsden Regional Medical Center
Gadsden Regional Physician Group Practice, LLC (DE)
Gadsden Regional Primary Care, LLC (AL)
Gaffney Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Gaffney H.M.A., LLC (SC)		d/b/a Mary Black Health System – Gaffney
Gaffney HMA Physician Management, LLC (SC)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Gaffney PPM, LLC (SC)
Galesburg Home Care, LLC# (DE)
Gateway Medical Services, Inc. (FL)
Granbury Clinic Asset Holding Company, LLC (DE)
Granbury Hospital Corporation (TX)		d/b/a Lake Granbury Medical Center
Granbury Mammography JV, LLC# (DE)
Granbury Texas Hospital Investment Corporation (DE)
Granite City Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
GRB Real Estate, LLC (DE)
Green Clinic, LLC (FL)
Greenbrier Valley Anesthesia, LLC (DE)
Greenbrier Valley Emergency Physicians, LLC (DE)
Greenbrier VMC, LLC* (DE)		d/b/a Greenbrier Valley Medical Center
GRMC Holdings, LLC (DE)
Gulf Coast HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
Gulf Coast Hospital, L.P. (DE)
Gulf Coast Medical Center, LLC (DE)
Gulf Oaks Therapeutic Day School, LLC (MS)
Gulf South Surgery Center, LLC# (MS)
Gulfmed, Inc.# (MS)
Haborside Surgery Center, LLC (FL)
Haines City HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
Haines City HMA Urgent Care, LLC (FL)
Haines City HMA, LLC* (FL)		d/b/a Heart of Florida Regional Medical Center
Hallmark Healthcare Company, LLC (DE)
Hamlet PPM, LLC (NC)
Harris Managed Services, Inc. (AR)
Harrison HMA Physician Management, LLC (MS)
Harrison HMA, LLC (MS)
Harton Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Hartsville ENT, LLC (SC)
Hartsville HMA Physician Management, LLC (SC)
Hartsville PPM, LLC (SC)
Hattiesburg ASC-GP, LLC (DE)
Hattiesburg Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Health Management Associates, LLC (DE)
Health Management Associates, LP (DE)
Health Management General Partner I, LLC (DE)
Health Management General Partner, LLC (DE)
Health Management Information Technology, LLC (DE)
Health Management Intellectual Properties, LLC (TX)
Health Management Physician Associates, LLC (DE)
Healthcare of Forsyth County, Inc. (GA)
HealthTrust Purchasing Group, L.P.# (DE)
Healthwest Holdings, Inc. (AZ)
Heart of Florida Surgery Center, LLC* (DE)
Hefner Pointe Medical Associates, LLC# (OK)
Helena Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Heritage Healthcare Innovation Fund II, LP# (DE)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Heritage Healthcare Innovation Fund, LP# (DE)
Hernando HMA Ancillary, LLC (FL)
Hernando HMA, LLC* (FL)		d/b/a Bayfront Health Brooksville; Bayfront Health Spring Hill
Highland Health Systems, Inc. (TX)
Hill Country ASC Partners, L.L.C.# (TX)
Hill Regional Clinic Corp. (TX)
HIM Central Services, LLC (DE)
HMA ASC Holdings, LLC (DE)
HMA ASCOA Holdings, LLC (DE)
HMA Bayflite Services, LLC (FL)
HMA Blue Chip Holdings, LLC (DE)
HMA CAT, LLC (TX)
HMA Employee Disaster Relief Fund, Inc. (FL)
HMA Fentress County General Hospital, LLC (TN)		d/b/a Tennova Healthcare – Jamestown
HMA Hospital Holdings, LP (DE)
HMA Lake Shore, Inc.* (FL)
HMA Leasing, LLC (TN)
HMA MRI, LLC (TX)
HMA Oklahoma Clearing Service, LLC (OK)
HMA Physician Practice Management, LLC (FL)
HMA Professional Services Group, LP (DE)
HMA Regent Holdings, LLC (DE)
HMA Santa Rosa Medical Center, LLC (FL)		d/b/a Santa Rosa Medical Center
HMA Services GP, LLC (DE)
HMA/Solantic Joint Venture, LLC# (DE)
HMA-ASCOA Investments, LLC* (DE)
HMA-ASCOA Investments, LLC* (DE)
HMA-TRI Holdings, LLC (DE)
Hobbs Medco, LLC (DE)
Hobbs Physician Practice, LLC (DE)
Hood Medical Group (TX)
Hood Medical Services, Inc. (TX)
Hospital Management Associates, LLC (FL)
Hospital Management Services of Florida, LP (FL)
Hospital of Fulton, Inc. (KY)
Hospital of Morristown, LLC (TN)		d/b/a Lakeway Regional Hospital
Hot Springs Outpatient Surgery Center, G.P. (AR)
HP LRHS Land, LLC# (IN)
HTI Tucson Rehabilitation, Inc. (AZ)
Humble Texas Home Care Corporation (TX)
ICSE Leasing Corp. (DE)
Illinois Home Care Holdings, LLC# (DE)
Imaging JV Holdings, LLC (DE)
INACTCO, Inc. (DE)
Innovations Surgery Center, LLC (FL)
Innovative Recoveries, LLC (DE)
Intermountain Medical Group, Inc. (PA)
IOM Health System, L.P.* (IN)		d/b/a Lutheran Hospital of Indiana
Jackson HMA North Medical Office Building, LLC (MS)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Jackson HMA, LLC (MS)		d/b/a Merit Health Central
Jackson Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Jackson Hospital Corporation (TN)
Jackson, Tennessee Hospital Company, LLC* (TN)		d/b/a Tennova Healthcare – Regional Jackson
Jamestown HMA Leasing, LLC (TN)
Jamestown HMA Physician Management, LLC (TN)
Jasper Medical Group, LLC (FL)
Jefferson County HMA, LLC (TN)		d/b/a Jefferson Memorial Hospital
Jennersville Family Medicine, LLC (DE)
Jennersville Regional Hospital Malpractice Assistance Fund, Inc. (PA)
Jourdanton Clinic Asset Holding Company, LLC (DE)
Jourdanton Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Jourdanton Hospital Corporation (TX)		d/b/a South Texas Regional Medical Center
Kay County Clinic Company, LLC (OK)
Kay County Hospital Corporation (OK)
Kay County Oklahoma Hospital Company, LLC (OK)		d/b/a AllianceHealth Ponca City
Kennett HMA Physician Management, LLC (MO)
Kennett HMA, LLC (MO)		d/b/a Twin Rivers Regional Medical Center
Key West HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
Key West HMA, LLC (FL)		d/b/a Lower Keys Medical Center
Keystone HMA Property Management, LLC (PA)
Kirksville Academic Medicine, LLC (MO)
Kirksville Clinic Corp. (MO)
Kirksville Home Care Services, LLC (MO)
Kirksville Hospital Company, LLC (DE)
Kirksville Missouri Hospital Company, LLC* (MO)		d/b/a Northeast Regional Medical Center
Kirksville Physical Therapy Services, LLC (DE)
Knox Hospital Company, LLC* (DE)		d/b/a Starke Hospital
Knoxville HMA Cardiology PPM, LLC (TN)
Knoxville HMA Development, LLC (TN)
Knoxville HMA Family Services, LLC (TN)
Knoxville HMA Holdings, LLC (TN)
Knoxville HMA Homecare DME & Hospice, LLC (TN)
Knoxville HMA JV Holdings, LLC (TN)
Knoxville HMA Mission Services, LLC (TN)
Knoxville HMA Physician Management, LLC (TN)
Knoxville HMA Wellness Center, LLC (TN)
Knoxville Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Knoxville, Tennessee Turkey Creek MOB, LLC (DE)
Kosciusko Ambulance Services, LLC (DE)
Kosciusko Medical Group, LLC (DE)
La Porte Clinic Company, LLC* (DE)
La Porte Health System, LLC* (DE)
La Porte Home Care Services, LLC* (DE)
La Porte Hospital Company, LLC* (DE)		d/b/a La Porte Hospital
La Porte Occupational Health Services, LLC* (DE)
Lake Area Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Lake Area Surgicare, A Partnership in Commendam* (LA)
Lake Shore HMA Medical Group, LLC* (FL)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Lake Shore HMA, LLC* (FL)		d/b/a Shands Lake Shore Regional Medical Center
Lake Wales Clinic Corp. (FL)
Lake Wales Hospital Corporation* (FL)		d/b/a Lake Wales Medical Center
Lake Wales Hospital Investment Corporation* (FL)
Lake Wales Imaging Center, LLC (DE)
Lakeland Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Lakeway Hospital Company, LLC (TN)
Lancaster Clinic Corp. (SC)
Lancaster Emergency Medical Services Association (PA)
Lancaster HMA Physician Management, LLC (PA)
Lancaster HMA, LLC* (PA)		d/b/a Heart of Lancaster Regional Medical Center
Lancaster Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Lancaster Hospital Corporation (DE)		d/b/a Springs Memorial Hospital
Lancaster Imaging Center, LLC (SC)
Lancaster Medical Group HMA, LLC (PA)
Lancaster Medical Group, LLC (PA)
Lancaster Outpatient Imaging, LLC (PA)
LaPorte Medical Group Surgical Center, LLC# (IN)
Laredo Clinic Asset Holding Company, LLC (DE)
Laredo Texas Hospital Company, L.P. (TX)		d/b/a Laredo Medical Center
Las Cruces ASC-GP, LLC (DE)
Las Cruces Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Las Cruces Medical Center, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Mountain View Regional Medical Center
Las Cruces Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Las Cruces Surgery Center – Telshor, LLC (DE)
Las Cruces Surgery Center, L.P.* (DE)
Lea Regional Hospital, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Lea Regional Medical Center
Lebanon HMA Leasing, LLC (TN)
Lebanon HMA Physician Management, LLC (TN)
Lebanon HMA Surgery Center, LLC (TN)
Lebanon HMA, LLC (TN)		d/b/a Tennova Healthcare – Lebanon; Tennova Healthcare – McFarland Lebanon Campus
Lehigh HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
Lehigh HMA, LLC (FL)
LHT Knoxville Properties, LLC# (DE)
Little Rock HMA, Inc. (AR)
Live Oak HMA Medical Group, LLC* (FL)
Live Oak HMA, LLC* (FL)		d/b/a Shands Live Oak Regional Medical Center
Logan Hospital Corporation (WV)
Logan, West Virginia Hospital Company, LLC (WV)
Lone Star HMA Physician Management, Inc. (TX)
Lone Star HMA, L.P. (DE)
Longview Clinic Operations Company, LLC (DE)
Longview Medical Center, L.P. (DE)		d/b/a Longview Regional Medical Center
Longview Merger, LLC (DE)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Longview Outpatient Physical Therapy, LLC (DE)
Louisa Home Care Holdings, LLC (DE)
Louisa Home Care Services, LLC (DE)
Louisburg HMA Physician Management, LLC (NC)
Louisburg/Novant, LLC (NC)
Lower Florida Keys Physician/Hospital Organization, Inc.# (FL)
LRH, LLC (DE)
LS Psychiatric, LLC (DE)
Lufkin Clinic Asset Holding Company, LLC (DE)
Lutheran Health Network CBO, LLC (DE)
Lutheran Health Network Investors, LLC* (DE)
Lutheran Health Network of Indiana, LLC (DE)
Lutheran Health Quality Alliance, LLC (DE)
Lutheran Medical Group, LLC (DE)
Lutheran Medical Office Park Phase II Property Owners Association, Inc. # (IN)
Lutheran Medical Office Park Property Owners Association, Inc.# (IN)
Lutheran Musculoskeletal Center, LLC* (DE)
Lutheran/TRMA Network, LLC# (IN)
Macon Healthcare, LLC# (DE)
Madison Cardiovascular Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Madison Clinic Corp. (TN)
Madison HMA Physician Management, LLC (MS)
Madison HMA, LLC (MS)		d/b/a Merit Health Madison
Madison Hospital, LLC (AL)
Marathon H.M.A., LLC (FL)
Marathon HMA Medical Group, LLC (FL)
Marion Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Marshall County HMA, LLC (OK)		d/b/a AllianceHealth Madill
Marshall County HMPN, LLC (OK)
Martin Clinic Corp. (TN)
Martin Hospital Company, LLC (TN)		d/b/a Tennova Healthcare – Volunteer Martin
Martins Ferry Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Martins Ferry Hospital Company, LLC (DE)
Mary Black Health System LLC (DE)		d/b/a Mary Black Health System – Spartanburg
Mary Black Medical Office Building Limited Partnership* (SC)
Mary Black MOB II, L.P.* (SC)
Mary Black Orthopedic Group, LLC (DE)
Mary Black Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Mary Black Physicians Group, LLC (DE)
Mat-Su Regional ASC GP, LLC (DE)
Mat-Su Regional Surgery Center, L.P. (DE)
Mat-Su Valley II, LLC* (AK)
Mat-Su Valley III, LLC* (AK)
Mat-Su Valley Medical Center, LLC* (AK)		d/b/a Mat-Su Regional Medical Center
Mayes County HMA, LLC (OK)		d/b/a AllianceHealth Pryor

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Mayes County HMPN, LLC (OK)
Mayes County Home Health, LLC# (OK)
McKenna Court Homes, LLC (DE)
McNairy Clinic Corp. (TN)
McNairy Hospital Corporation (TN)
MCSA, L.L.C. (AR)
MDSave, Inc.# (DE)
Medical Arts General Partnership# (PA)
Medical Center at Terrell, LLC (DE)
Medical Center of Brownwood, LLC (DE)
Medical Holdings, Inc. (KS)
Medical Imaging Center of Ocala, LLP# (FL)
MEDSTAT, LLC (IN)
Melbourne HMA Medical Group, LLC (FL)
Melbourne HMA, LLC (FL)		d/b/a Wuesthoff Medical Center – Melbourne
Memorial Hospital of Salem Malpractice Assistance Fund, Inc. (NJ)
Mercy Cardiovascular Cath Lab, LLC# (PA)
Merger Legacy Holdings, LLC (DE)
Meridian HMA Clinic Management, LLC (MS)
Meridian HMA Nursing Home, LLC (MS)
Meridian HMA, LLC (MS)
Merit Health Biloxi ASC Holdings, LLC (DE)
Merritt Island ASC, LLC* (FL)
Mesquite HMA General, LLC (DE)
Metro Knoxville HMA, LLC (TN)		d/b/a Physicians Regional Medical Center; Turkey Creek Medical Center; North Knoxville Medical Center
MHS Ambulatory Surgery Center, Inc. (ND)
Michigan City MOB, LLC# (IN)
Mid-Plains, LLC (DE)
Midwest City HMA Physician Management, LLC* (OK)
Midwest Regional Medical Center, LLC* (OK)		d/b/a AllianceHealth Midwest
Minot Health Services, Inc. (ND)
Mississippi Alzheimer Holdings, LLC (DE)
Mississippi Health Management Medical Education Fund, LLC (MS)
Mississippi HMA DME, LLC (MS)
Mississippi HMA Holdings I, LLC (DE)
Mississippi HMA Holdings II, LLC (DE)
Mississippi HMA Hospitalists, LLC (MS)
Mississippi HMA Regional Service Center, LLC (MS)
Mississippi HMA Urgent Care, LLC (MS)
Mississippi HMA Ventures, LLC (MS)
Mississippi LTAC Holdings, LLC (DE)
ML Surgery Center, L.L.C. (PA)
Moberly HBP Medical Group, LLC (DE)
Moberly Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Moberly Regional Medical Center
Moberly Medical Clinics, Inc. (MO)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Moberly Physicians Corp. (MO)
Mohave Imaging Center, LLC (AZ)
Mooresville HMA Investors, LLC* (NC)
Mooresville HMA Physician Management, LLC (NC)
Mooresville Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Mooresville Hospital Management Associates, LLC* (NC)		d/b/a Lake Norman Regional Medical Center
Mooresville PPM, LLC* (NC)
Morristown Clinic Corp. (TN)
Morristown Professional Centers, Inc. (TN)
Morristown Surgery Center, LLC (TN)
Munroe HMA HMPN, LLC (FL)
Munroe HMA Holdings, LLC* (FL)
Munroe HMA Hospital, LLC (FL)		d/b/a Munroe Regional Medical Center
Munroe HMA Physician Health Partners, LLC (FL)
Munroe Regional Homecare, LLC# (FL)
Nanticoke Hospital Company, LLC (DE)
Naples HMA, LLC (FL)		d/b/a Physicians Regional Medical Center – Pine Ridge; Physicians Regional Medical Center – Collier
Natchez Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Natchez HBP Services, LLC (DE)
Natchez Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Merit Health Natchez
National Healthcare of England Arkansas, Inc. (AR)
National Healthcare of Holmes County, Inc. (FL)
National Healthcare of Leesville, Inc. (DE)		d/b/a Byrd Regional Hospital
National Healthcare of Newport, Inc. (DE)
Navarro Hospital, L.P. (DE)		d/b/a Navarro Regional Hospital
Navarro Regional, LLC (DE)
NC-CSH, Inc. (CA)
NC-DSH, LLC (NV)
Neuroskeletal Imaging, LLC* (FL)
New Cedar Lake Surgery Center, LLC# (MS)
Newport Home Care Services, LLC (DE)
Newport Physician Clinics, Inc. (AR)
NHCI of Hillsboro, Inc. (TX)		d/b/a Hill Regional Hospital
North Carolina HMA Regional Service Center, LLC (NC)
North Okaloosa Clinic Corp. (FL)
North Okaloosa Home Health, LLC# (FL)
North Okaloosa Medical Corp.* (FL)
North Okaloosa Surgery Venture Corp. (FL)
North Port HMA, LLC (FL)
Northampton Cardiology Clinic, LLC (DE)
Northampton Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Northampton Endoscopy Center, LLC* (DE)
Northampton Home Care, LLC# (DE)
Northampton Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Easton Hospital
Northampton Physician Services Corp. (PA)
Northampton Urgent Care, LLC (DE)
Northeast Medical Center, L.P. (DE)
Northeastern Pennsylvania Imaging Center# (PA)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Northern Indiana Oncology Center of Porter Memorial Hospital, LLC* (IN)
Northwest Allied Physicians, LLC (DE)
Northwest Arkansas Employees, LLC (DE)
Northwest Arkansas Hospitals, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Northwest Medical Center – Bentonville; Northwest Medical Center – Springdale; Willow Creek Women’s Hospital
Northwest Benton County Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Northwest Cardiology, LLC (DE)
Northwest Hospital Cardiac Diagnostics, L.P. (TN)
Northwest Hospital, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Northwest Medical Center
Northwest Indiana Health System, LLC* (DE)
Northwest Marana Hospital, LLC (DE)
Northwest Medical Center CT/MRI at Marana, LLC (DE)
Northwest Physicians, LLC (AR)
Northwest Rancho Vistoso Imaging Services, LLC (DE)
Northwest Tucson ASC-GP, LLC (DE)
Northwest-Sparks Quality Alliance, LLC (DE)
NOV Holdings, LLC (DE)
NRH, LLC (DE)
NWA Outpatient Surgery Center, LLC (DE)
Oak Hill Clinic Corp. (WV)
Oak Hill Hospital Corporation (WV)		d/b/a Plateau Medical Center
Ohio Medical Imaging JV, LLC# (DE)
Ohio Sleep Disorders Centers, LLC# (OH)
Oklahoma City ASC-GP, LLC (DE)
Oklahoma City Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Oklahoma HMA Urgent Care, LLC* (OK)
Olive Branch Clinic Corp. (MS)
Olive Branch Hospital, Inc. (MS)
One Boyertown Properties, L.P.# (PA)
Open Air of MSLOU, L.L.C. (LA)
Oro Valley Hospital, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Oro Valley Hospital
OsceolaSC, LLC* (DE)		d/b/a St. Cloud Regional Medical Center
Osler HMA Medical Group, LLC (FL)
Oviedo HMA, LLC (FL)
Pacific Group ASC Division, Inc. (AZ)
Pacific Physicians Services, LLC (DE)
Pain Management Joint Venture, LLP# (TX)
Palm Drive Hospital, L.P. (DE)
Palm Drive Medical Center, LLC (DE)
Palmer-Wasilla Health System, LLC (DE)
Palmetto Tri-County Medical Specialists, LLC (DE)
Palmetto Women’s Care, LLC (DE)
Pampa Medical Center, LLC (DE)
Panhandle Medical Center, LLC (DE)
Panhandle Surgical Hospital, L.P. (DE)
Parkway Regional Medical Clinic, Inc. (KY)
Pasco Hernando HMA Physician Management, LLC* (FL)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Pasco Regional Medical Center, LLC (FL)		d/b/a Bayfront Health Dade City
Payson Healthcare Management, Inc. (AZ)
Payson Home Care Services, LLC (DE)
Payson Hospital Corporation (AZ)
PBEC HMA, Inc. (FL)
PDMC, LLC (DE)
Peace River HMA Nursing Center, LLC (FL)
Peckville Hospital Company, LLC (DE)
Pecos Valley of New Mexico, LLC (DE)
Peerless Healthcare, LLC (TN)
Pennsylvania Hospital Company, LLC (DE)
Personal Home Health Care, LLC (TN)
Petersburg Clinic Company, LLC (VA)
Petersburg Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Petersburg Hospital Company, LLC* (VA)		d/b/a Southside Regional Medical Center
Phillips & Coker OB-GYN, LLC (DE)
Phoenix Surgical, LLC (DE)
Phoenixville Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Phoenixville Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Phoenixville Hospital
Phoenixville Hospital Malpractice Assistance Fund, Inc. (PA)
Phoenixville Orthopedic Specialists, LLC (DE)
Phoenixville Specialty Clinics, LLC (DE)
Physician Practice Support, LLC (TN)
Physicians Regional Marco Island, LLC (FL)
Piney Woods Healthcare System, L.P.* (DE)		d/b/a Woodland Heights Medical Center
Plymouth Hospital Corporation (NC)
Poinciana HMA, LLC (FL)
Polk Medical Services, Inc. (TN)
Ponca City Home Care Services, LLC# (OK)
Poplar Bluff Physician Management, LLC (MO)
Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center, LLC (MO)		d/b/a Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center
Port Charlotte HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
Port Charlotte HMA, LLC (FL)		d/b/a Bayfront Health Port Charlotte
Porter Health Services, LLC (DE)
Porter Hospital, LLC* (DE)		d/b/a Porter Regional Hospital
Porter Outpatient Services, LLC (DE)
Porter Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Pottstown Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Pottstown Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Pottstown Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Pottstown Memorial Medical Center
Pottstown Hospital Corporation (PA)
Pottstown Imaging Company, LLC (DE)
Pottstown Medical Specialists, Inc.# (PA)
Pottstown Memorial Ambulance Company, LLC (DE)
Pottstown Memorial Malpractice Assistance Fund, Inc. (PA)
Pottstown Professional Services Company, LLC (DE)
Preferential Health Network, Inc. (SC)
Preferred Nurse Staffing, LLC (MS)
Premier Care Super PHO, LLC (DE)
PremierCare of Arkansas, LLC (DE)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


PremierCare of Northwest Arkansas, LLC (AR)
Procure Solutions, LLC (DE)
Professional Account Services Inc. (TN)
Punta Gorda HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
Punta Gorda HMA, LLC (FL)		d/b/a Bayfront Health Punta Gorda
Punta Gorda Medical Arts Center Association, Inc. (FL)
QHG Georgia Holdings II, LLC (DE)
QHG Georgia Holdings, Inc. (GA)
QHG Georgia, L.P. (GA)
QHG of Barberton, Inc. (OH)
QHG of Bluffton Company, LLC (DE)
QHG of Clinton County, Inc. (IN)
QHG of Enterprise, Inc. (AL)		d/b/a Medical Center Enterprise
QHG of Forrest County, Inc. (MS)
QHG of Fort Wayne Company, LLC (DE)
QHG of Hattiesburg, Inc. (MS)
QHG of Kenmare, Inc. (ND)
QHG of Lake City, Inc. (SC)
QHG of Minot, Inc. (ND)
QHG of Ohio, Inc. (OH)
QHG of South Carolina, Inc. (SC)		d/b/a Carolinas Hospital System; Carolinas Hospital System - Marion
QHG of Spartanburg, Inc. (SC)
QHG of Springdale, Inc. (AR)
QHG of Texas, Inc. (TX)
QHG of Warsaw Company, LLC (DE)
Quorum ELF, Inc. (DE)
Quorum Health Services, Inc. (DE)
Rankin Cardiology Center, LLC (MS)
Red Bud Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Redimed Dekalb, LLC (IN)
Regional Cancer Treatment Center, Ltd.# (TX)
Regional Cardiology Center, L.L.C.# (MS)
Regional Cardiology Group, LLC (DE)
Regional Employee Assistance Program (TX)
Regional Hospital of Longview, LLC (DE)
Regional Surgical Services, LLC (VA)
Rehab Hospital of Fort Wayne General Partnership* (DE)
Revenue Cycle Service Center, LLC (DE)
River Oaks Hospital, LLC (MS)		d/b/a Merit Health River Oaks
River Oaks Management Company, LLC (MS)
River Oaks Medical Office Building, LLC (MS)
River Region Medical Corporation (MS)
Riverpark Community Cath Lab, LLC# (DE)
Riverview Regional Medical Center, LLC* (DE)
Rockledge HMA Convenient Care, LLC (FL)
Rockledge HMA Medical Group, LLC (FL)
Rockledge HMA Urgent Care, LLC (FL)
Rockledge HMA, LLC (FL)		d/b/a Wuesthoff Medical Center - Rockledge
Rockwood Clinic Real Estate Holdings, LLC (DE)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Rockwood Clinic, P.S.* (WA)
ROH, LLC (MS)		d/b/a Merit Health Woman’s Hospital
Ronceverte Physician Group, LLC (DE)
Rose City HMA Medical Group, LLC* (PA)
Rose City HMA, LLC* (PA)		d/b/a Lancaster Regional Medical Center
Roswell Clinic Corp. (NM)
Roswell Community Hospital Investment Corporation (DE)
Roswell Hospital Corporation (NM)		d/b/a Eastern New Mexico Medical Center
Russell County Clinic Corp. (VA)
Russell County Medical Center, Inc. (VA)
Ruston Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Ruston Hospital Corporation (DE)
Ruston Louisiana Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Northern Louisiana Medical Center
SACMC, LLC (DE)
Salem Clinic Corp. (NJ)
Salem Home Care Holdings, LLC (DE)
Salem Home Care Services, LLC (DE)
Salem Hospital Corporation (NJ)		d/b/a The Memorial Hospital of Salem County
Samaritan Surgicenters of Arizona II, LLC (AZ)
San Angelo Ambulatory Surgery Center, Ltd.# (TX)
San Angelo Community Medical Center, LLC (DE)
San Angelo Hospital, L.P.# (DE)		d/b/a San Angelo Community Medical Center
San Angelo Medical, LLC (DE)
San Leandro Hospital, L.P. (DE)
San Leandro Medical Center, LLC (DE)
San Leandro, LLC (DE)
Santa Rosa HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
Santa Rosa HMA Urgent Care, LLC (FL)
SCA JV II, LLC# (DE)
SCA JV, LLC* (DE)
Schuylkill Internal Medicine Associates, LLC (DE)
Scott County HMA, LLC (TN)
Scranton Cardiovascular Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Scranton Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Scranton Emergency Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Scranton GP Holdings, LLC (DE)
Scranton Holdings, LLC (DE)
Scranton Home Care Services, LLC (DE)
Scranton Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Regional Hospital of Scranton
Scranton Hospitalist Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Scranton Quincy Ambulance, LLC (DE)
Scranton Quincy Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Scranton Quincy Holdings, LLC (DE)
Scranton Quincy Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Scranton Quincy Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Moses Taylor Hospital
Scranton Quincy QRFS, LLC (DE)
SE PA Medical Imaging JV, LLC# (DE)
Sebastian HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
Sebastian Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Sebastian Hospital, LLC (FL)		d/b/a Sebastian River Medical Center

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Sebastian River Medical Plaza Condominium Association, Inc.* (FL)
Sebastopol, LLC (DE)
Sebring HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
Sebring Hospital Management Associates, LLC (FL)		d/b/a Highlands Regional Medical Center
Seminole HMA, LLC (OK)		d/b/a AllianceHealth Seminole
Seminole HMPN, LLC (OK)
Senior Circle Association (TN)
SEPA Integrated Providers Alliance, LLC (DE)
SEPASC JV, LLC* (DE)
Sharon Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Sharon Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Sharon Pennsylvania Holdings, LLC (DE)
Sharon Pennsylvania Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Sharon Regional Health System
Sharon Regional HBP Medical Group, LLC (DE)
Shelby Alabama Real Estate, LLC (DE)
Shelbyville Clinic Corp. (TN)
Shelbyville Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Shelbyville Hospital Company, LLC (TN)		d/b/a Tennova Healthcare – Shelbyville
Sherman Hospital, L.P. (DE)
Sherman Medical Center, LLC (DE)
Siloam Springs Arkansas Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Siloam Springs Regional Hospital
Siloam Springs Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Siloam Springs Holdings, LLC (DE)
Silver Creek MRI, LLC (AZ)
SJ Home Care, LLC# (DE)
SkyRidge Clinical Associates, LLC (DE)
SLH, LLC (DE)
South Alabama Managed Care Contracting, Inc. (AL)
South Alabama Medical Management Services, Inc. (AL)
South Alabama Physician Services, Inc. (AL)
South Arkansas Clinic, LLC (DE)
South Arkansas Physician Services, LLC (DE)
South Tulsa Medical Group, LLC (DE)
SouthCrest Anesthesia Group, LLC (DE)
SouthCrest Medical Group, LLC (DE)
SouthCrest, L.L.C. (OK)
Southeast Alabama Maternity Center, LLC# (AL)
Southeast HMA Holdings, LLC (DE)
Southern Chester County Medical Building I* (PA)
Southern Chester County Medical Building II* (PA)
Southern Texas Medical Center, LLC (DE)
Southside Physician Network, LLC (DE)
Southwest Florida HMA Holdings, LLC (DE)
Southwest Physicians Risk Retention Group, Inc. (SC)
Sparks PremierCare, L.L.C. (AR)
Spokane Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Spokane Valley Washington Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Valley Hospital and Medical Center
Spokane Washington Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Deaconess Hospital
Spring Hill HMA Medical Group, LLC (FL)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Spring Hill HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
Springdale Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Sprocket Medical Management, LLC (TX)
SS ParentCo., LLC (DE)
St. Cloud HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
St. Cloud Physician Management, LLC* (FL)
St. Joseph Health System, LLC* (DE)		d/b/a St. Joseph Health System
St. Joseph Medical Group, Inc. (IN)
Starke HMA Medical Group, LLC* (FL)
Starke HMA, LLC* (FL)		d/b/a Shands Starke Regional Medical Center
Statesboro HMA Medical Group, LLC (GA)
Statesboro HMA Physician Management, LLC (GA)
Statesville HMA Medical Group, LLC (NC)
Statesville HMA Physician Management, LLC (NC)
Statesville HMA, LLC (NC)		d/b/a Davis Regional Medical Center
Statesville PPM, LLC (NC)
StrokeCareNow, LLC# (IN)
Summit Surgical Suites, LLC# (IN)
Sumter HMA, LLC (FL)
Supply Chain Shared Service Center, LLC (DE)
Surgery Center of Midwest City, LLC* (DE)
Surgery Center of Salem County, L.L.C.* (NJ)
Surgical Center of Amarillo, LLC (DE)
Surgical Center of Carlsbad, LLC (DE)
Surgicare of Clarksville, LLC# (TN)
Surgicare of Independence, Inc. (MO)
Surgicare of San Leandro, Inc. (CA)
Surgicare of Sherman, Inc. (TX)
Surgicare of Victoria, Inc. (TX)
Surgicare of Victoria, Ltd. (TX)
Surgicare Outpatient Center of Lake Charles, Inc. (LA)
Surgicenter of Johnson County, Inc. (KS)
Surgicenters of America, Inc. (AZ)
Susitna Surgery Center, LLC (DE)
SVRMC-HBP, LLC (DE)
Tennessee HMA Holdings, LP (DE)
Tennessee HMA Regional Service Center, LLC (TN)
Tennyson Holdings, LLC (DE)
Terrell Hospital, L.P. (DE)
Terrell Medical Center, LLC (DE)
Texas Bay Area Clinical Services, Inc. (TX)
Texas Mammography JV Holdings, LLC# (DE)
Texas Women’s Imaging JV Holdings, LLC (DE)
The LAMC Building E Condominium Association, Inc.* (LA)
The Sleep Disorder Center of Wyoming Valley, LLC (PA)
The Surgery Center at Durant, LLC* (OK)
The Surgery Center of Ocala, LLC# (TN)
The Surgery Center, LLC (MS)
The Vicksburg Clinic, LLC (DE)
Timberland Medical Group (TX)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


TimberRidge Imaging Center, LLP# (FL)
Tomball Ambulatory Surgery Center, L.P. (TX)
Tomball Clinic Asset Holding Company, LLC (DE)
Tomball Sports Training Venture, LLC* (DE)
Tomball Texas Equipment Ventures, LLC (TX)
Tomball Texas Holdings, LLC (DE)
Tomball Texas Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Tomball Texas Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Tomball Regional Medical Center
Tomball Texas Ventures, LLC (DE)
Triad Corporate Services, Limited Partnership (DE)
Triad CSGP, LLC (DE)
Triad CSLP, LLC (DE)
Triad Healthcare System of Phoenix, L.P. (DE)
Triad Healthcare, LLC (DE)
Triad Holdings III, LLC (DE)
Triad Holdings IV, LLC (DE)
Triad Holdings V, LLC (DE)
Triad Holdings VI, Inc. (DE)
Triad Indiana Holdings, LLC* (DE)
Triad Nevada Holdings, LLC (DE)
Triad of Alabama, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Flowers Hospital
Triad of Arizona (L.P.), Inc. (AZ)
Triad of Phoenix, Inc. (AZ)
Triad RC, Inc. (DE)
Triad-Arizona I, Inc. (AZ)
Triad-ARMC, LLC (DE)
Triad-Denton Hospital GP, LLC (DE)
Triad-Denton Hospital, L.P. (DE)
Triad-El Dorado, Inc. (AR)
Triad-Navarro Regional Hospital Subsidiary, LLC (DE)
Triad-South Tulsa Hospital Company, Inc. (OK)
Tri-Irish, Inc. (DE)
Tri-World, LLC (DE)
TROSCO, LLC (DE)
Troy Hospital Corporation (AL)
Tucson Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Tug Valley Healthcare Alliance, Inc. (WV)
Tullahoma HMA Leasing, LLC (TN)
Tullahoma HMA Physician Management, LLC (TN)
Tullahoma HMA, LLC (TN)		d/b/a Tennova Healthcare – Harton
Tunkhannock Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Tunkhannock Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Tyler Memorial Hospital
Tunkhannock Hospital Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Tuscora Park Medical Specialists, LLC (DE)
Upper Delaware Valley Cancer Center Associates# (PA)
Urgent Care JV Holdings, LLC (DE)
USRC Montgomery Partners, LLC# (PA)
USRC PMMC, LLC# (PA)
USRC Pottstown, LLC# (PA)
Valley Advanced Imaging, LLC# (IN)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


Valley Advanced MRI, LLC# (IN)
ValleyCare Cardiology Group, LLC (DE)
Valparaiso Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Van Buren H.M.A., LLC (AR)		d/b/a Summit Medical Center
Van Buren HMA Central Business Office, LLC (AR)
Vanderbilt-Gateway Cancer Center, G.P.# (DE)
Venice HMA, LLC (FL)		d/b/a Venice Regional Bayfront Health
Venice Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Vero Beach Florida ASC, LLC (DE)
VHC Holdings, LLC (DE)
VHC Medical, LLC (DE)
Vicksburg Healthcare, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Merit Health River Region
Vicksburg HMA Physician Management, LLC (MS)
Vicksburg Surgical Center, LLC (DE)
Victoria Clinic Asset Holding Company, LLC (DE)
Victoria Hospital, LLC (DE)
Victoria of Texas, L.P. (DE)		d/b/a DeTar Hospital Navarro; DeTar Hospital North
Victoria Texas Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Village Medical Center Associates, LLC (DE)
Virginia Care Company, LLC (DE)
Virginia Hospital Company, LLC (VA)
VirtualHealthNow, LLC (DE)
Warren Ohio Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Trumbull Memorial Hospital
Warren Ohio Physician Services, LLC (DE)
Warren Ohio Rehab Hospital Company, LLC (DE)
Warsaw Health System, LLC* (DE)		d/b/a Kosciusko Community Hospital
Washington Clinic Corp. (MS)
Washington Hospital Corporation (MS)
Washington Physician Corp. (MS)
WA-SPOK DH CRNA, LLC (DE)
WA-SPOK DH Urgent Care, LLC (DE)
WA-SPOK Kidney Care, LLC (DE)
WA-SPOK Medical Care, LLC (DE)
WA-SPOK Primary Care, LLC (DE)
WA-SPOK Pulmonary & Critical Care, LLC (DE)
WA-SPOK VH CRNA, LLC (DE)
WA-SPOK VH Urgent Care, LLC (DE)
Wauchula HMA Physician Management, LLC (FL)
Waukegan Hospice, LLC# (DE)
Weatherford Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Weatherford Hospital Corporation (TX)
Weatherford Mammography JV, LLC# (DE)
Weatherford Texas Hospital Company, LLC (TX)		d/b/a Weatherford Regional Medical Center
Webb County Texas Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Webb Hospital Corporation (DE)
Webb Hospital Holdings, LLC (DE)
Wesley Health System LLC (DE)		d/b/a Merit Health Wesley
Wesley HealthTrust, Inc. (MS)
Wesley Physician Services, LLC (DE)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


West Anaheim Medical Center, LLC (DE)
West Anaheim, LLC (DE)
West Grove Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
West Grove Family Practice, LLC (DE)
West Grove Home Care, LLC# (DE)
West Grove Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Jennersville Regional Hospital
Western Arizona Regional Home Health and Hospice, LLC# (AZ)
Western Reserve Health Education, Inc. (DE)
Westmed (TX)
Wharton Medco, LLC (DE)
Wheeling HBP Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Wheeling West Virginia Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Wheeling West Virginia Hospital Company, LLC (DE)
WHMC, LLC (DE)
Wichita Falls Texas Home Care, LLC# (TX)
Wichita Falls Texas Private Duty Corporation (TX)
Wilkes-Barre Academic Medicine, LLC (DE)
Wilkes-Barre Behavioral Hospital Company, LLC (DE)
Wilkes-Barre Behavioral Ventures, LLC (DE)
Wilkes-Barre Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Wilkes-Barre Community Residential Unit, LLC (DE)
Wilkes-Barre Holdings, LLC (DE)
Wilkes-Barre Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Wilkes-Barre Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Wilkes-Barre General Hospital
Wilkes-Barre Intermountain Clinic, LLC (DE)
Wilkes-Barre Personal Care Services, LLC (DE)
Wilkes-Barre Radiation Oncology, LLC# (DE)
Wilkes-Barre Skilled Nursing Services, LLC (DE)
Willamette Community Medical Group, LLC (DE)
Williamson HMA Physician Management, LLC* (DE)
Williamson Memorial Hospital, LLC* (WV)		d/b/a Williamson Memorial Hospital
Wiregrass Clinic, LLC (DE)
Women & Children’s Hospital, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Lake Area Medical Center
Women’s Health Partners, LLC (DE)
Women’s Health Specialists of Birmingham, Inc. (AL)
Women’s Health Specialists of Carlisle, LLC (PA)
Woodland Heights Medical Center, LLC (DE)
Woodward Clinic Company, LLC (DE)
Woodward Health System, LLC (DE)		d/b/a AllianceHealth Woodward
Woodward Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Wyoming Michigan Holdings, LLC (DE)
Yakima HMA Home Health, LLC (WA)
Yakima HMA Physician Management, LLC (WA)
Yakima HMA, LLC (WA)		d/b/a Toppenish Community Hospital; Yakima Regional Medical & Cardiac Center
Yakima Home Care Holdings, LLC (DE)
York Anesthesiology Physician Services, LLC (DE)
York Clinic Company, LLC (DE)

Community Health Systems, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LISTING


York Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
York Pathology Physician Services, LLC (DE)
York Pennsylvania Holdings, LLC (DE)
York Pennsylvania Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Memorial Hospital
Youngstown Home Care Services, LLC# (DE)
Youngstown Ohio Hospital Company, LLC (DE)		d/b/a Northside Medical Center
Youngstown Ohio Laboratory Services Company, LLC (DE)
Youngstown Ohio Outpatient Services Company, LLC (DE)
Youngstown Ohio Physician Services Company, LLC (DE)
Youngstown Ohio PSC, LLC (DE)

EX-23.1

Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-203918 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-61614, 333-100349, 333-107810, 333-121282, 333-144525, 333-163688, 333-163689, 333-163691, 333-176893, 333-188343, 333-190260, 333-197813, 333-207772, 333-212874, and 333-214389 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 21, 2017, relating to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule of Community Health Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of Community Health Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Community Health Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2016.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Nashville, Tennessee

February 21, 2017

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Wayne T. Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Community Health Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Wayne T. Smith

Wayne T. Smith

Chairman of the Board

and Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 21, 2017

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, W. Larry Cash, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Community Health Systems, Inc.;

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ W. Larry Cash

W. Larry Cash

President of Financial Services,

Chief Financial Officer and Director

Date: February 21, 2017

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Community Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wayne T. Smith, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Wayne T. Smith

Wayne T. Smith

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer

February 21, 2017

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Community Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, W. Larry Cash, President of Financial Services and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ W. Larry Cash

W. Larry Cash

President of Financial Services, Chief Financial

Officer and Director

February 21, 2017

EX-99.2

Exhibit 99.2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

NASHVILLE DIVISION


In re COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS,	)	Master Docket No. 3:11-cv-00489
INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE	)
LITIGATION	)	(Consolidated with No. 3:11-cv-00598 and
	)	No. 3:11-cv-00952)
	)
This Document Relates To:	)	Judge Kevin H. Sharp
	)
ALL ACTIONS.	)	Magistrate Judge Joe B. Brown
	)

ORDER APPROVING DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

^{This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to the Order of this Court, dated November 22, 2016 (“Order”), on Plaintiffs’ motion for approval of the settlement
(“Settlement”) set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement, dated November 18, 2016 (the “Stipulation”). Due and adequate notice having been given of the Settlement as required in said Order, and the Court having considered
all papers filed and proceedings had herein, and otherwise being fully informed in the premises and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED
that:}

^{1. This Final Approval Order incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation, and all
capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation (in addition to those capitalized terms defined herein).}

^{2.
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action, including all matters necessary to effectuate the Settlement, and over all parties to the Action, including, but not limited to, the Plaintiffs,
Community Health Systems, Inc. (“CHSI”), CHSI stockholders, and the Settling Defendants.}

^{3.
The Court finds that the notice provided to CHSI stockholders was the best notice practicable under the circumstances of these proceedings and of the matters set forth therein, including the Settlement set forth in the
Stipulation, to all Persons entitled to such notice. The notice fully satisfied the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1 and the requirements of due process.}

^{4.
The Action and all claims contained therein, as well as all of the Released Claims, are dismissed with prejudice. As among Plaintiffs, the Settling Defendants and CHSI, the parties are to bear their own costs, except as
otherwise provided in the Stipulation.}

^{5. The Court finds that the terms of the Stipulation and Settlement are fair, reasonable and
adequate as to each of the Settling Parties, and hereby finally approves the Stipulation and Settlement in all respects, and orders the Settling Parties to perform its terms to the extent the Settling Parties have not already done so.}

^{6. Upon the Effective Date, CHSI, CHSI stockholders and the Plaintiffs (acting on their own behalf and derivatively on behalf of CHSI) shall be
deemed to have, and by operation of this}

- 1 -

^{Final Approval Order and the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released,
relinquished and discharged and dismissed with prejudice the Released Claims against the Released Persons and any and all causes of action or claims (including Unknown Claims) that have or could have been asserted in the Action by Plaintiffs, CHSI
or any CHSI stockholder derivatively on behalf of CHSI against the Settling Defendants or the Released Persons, based on the Settling Defendants’ acts and/or omissions in connection with, arising out of, or relating to, the facts, transactions,
events, matters, occurrences, acts, disclosures, statements, omissions or failures to act at issue in this Action through and including the date of execution of the Stipulation and including claims arising out of, relating to, or in connection with
the defense, settlement, or resolution of the Action. Nothing herein shall in any way impair or restrict the rights of any Settling Party to enforce the terms of the Stipulation.}

^{7.
Upon the Effective Date, Plaintiffs (acting on their own behalf and derivatively on behalf of CHSI and its stockholders), CHSI, and any Person acting on behalf of CHSI, shall be forever barred and enjoined from
commencing, instituting or prosecuting any of the Released Claims against any of the Released Persons or any action or other proceeding against any of the Released Persons arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the Released Claims, the
Action, or the filing, prosecution, defense, settlement, or resolution of the Action. Nothing herein shall in any way impair or restrict the rights of any Settling Party to enforce the terms of the Stipulation.}

^{8. Upon the Effective Date, each of the Released Persons and the Related Parties shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Final Approval
Order and the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and discharged each and all of the Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Counsel and all CHSI stockholders (solely in their capacity as CHSI stockholders) from all
claims (including Unknown Claims) arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the institution, prosecution, assertion, settlement or resolution of the Action or the Released Claims. Nothing herein shall in any way impair or restrict the
rights of any Settling Party to enforce the terms of the Stipulation.}

^{9.
The Court hereby approves the Fee and Expense Amount in accordance with the Stipulation and finds that such fee is fair and reasonable.}

- 2 -

^{10. Neither the Stipulation nor the Settlement, including the Exhibits attached thereto, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in
furtherance of the Stipulation or the Settlement: (a) is or may be deemed to be or may be offered, attempt to be offered or used in any way as a concession, admission, or evidence of the validity of any Released Claims or any fault, wrongdoing
or liability of the Released Persons or CHSI; or (b) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as a presumption, admission, or evidence of any liability, fault or omission of any of the Released Persons or CHSI in any civil, criminal or
administrative or other proceeding in any court, administrative agency, tribunal or other forum. Neither the Stipulation nor the Settlement, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the
Settlement, shall be admissible in any proceeding for any purpose, except to enforce the terms of the Settlement and Stipulation, and except that the Released Persons may file or use the Stipulation, the Final Approval Order and/or the Judgment in
any action that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, full faith and credit, release, standing, judgment bar or reduction or any other theory
of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim.}

^{11.
During the course of the Action, the parties and their respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, any applicable Tennessee law and all other similar laws.}

^{12. Without affecting the finality of this Final Approval Order and the Judgment in any way, this Court hereby retains continuing jurisdiction over the Action
and the parties to the Stipulation to enter any further orders as may be necessary to effectuate, implement and enforce the Stipulation and the Settlement provided for therein and the provisions of this Final Approval Order.}

- 3 -

^{13. This Final Approval Order and the Judgment is a final and appealable resolution in the Action as to all claims and the Court directs immediate entry of the
Judgment forthwith by the Clerk in accordance with Rule 58, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, dismissing the Action with prejudice.}


IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:	January 17, 2017	/s/ Kevin H. Sharp
		THE HONORABLE KEVIN H. SHARP
		UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Submitted by:

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN

& DOWD LLP

DARREN J. ROBBINS

BENNY C. GOODMAN III

ERIK W. LUEDEKE

JUAN CARLOS SANCHEZ

/s/ Benny C. Goodman III

BENNY C. GOODMAN III

655 West Broadway, Suite 1900

San Diego, CA 92101

Telephone: 619/231-1058

619/231-7423 (fax)

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN

& DOWD LLP

JOHN C. HERMAN

Monarch Centre, Suite 1650

3424 Peachtree Road, N.E.

Atlanta, GA 30326

Telephone: 404/504-6500

404/504-6501 (fax)

DAVIES, HUMPHREYS, HORTON

& REESE

WADE B. COWAN

85 White Bridge Road, Suite 300

Nashville, TN 37205

Telephone: 615/256-8125

615/242-7853 (fax)

- 4 -

ROBBINS ARROYO LLP

BRIAN J. ROBBINS

KEVIN A. SEELY

ASHLEY R. RIFKIN

600 B Street, Suite 1900

San Diego, CA 92101

Telephone: 619/525-3990

619/525-3991 (fax)

SULLIVAN, WARD, ASHER & PATTON, P.C.

MICHAEL J. ASHER

25800 Northwestern Highway

1000 Maccabees Center

Southfield, MI 48075-1000

Telephone: 248/746-0700

248/746-2760 (fax)

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

PROSKAUER LLP

PETER DUFFY DOYLE

/s/ Peter D. Doyle

PETER DUFFY DOYLE

Eleven Times Square

New York, NY 10036-8299

Telephone: 212/969-3000

212/969-2900 (fax)

Counsel for Defendants Wayne T. Smith, W. Larry

Cash, John A. Clerico, John A. Fry, William

Norris Jennings, Julia B. North, H. Mitchell

Watson, Jr. and Counsel for T. Mark Buford and

James S. Elv III

ROBBINS, RUSSELL, ENGLERT, ORSECK,

UNTEREINER & SAUBER LLP

GARY A. ORSECK

MICHAEL L. WALDMAN

ALISON C. BARNES

MATTHEW M. MADDEN

/s/ Matthew Madden

MATTHEW M. MADDEN

- 5 -

1801 K Street, N.W., Suite 411L

Washington, DC 20006

Telephone: 202/775-4500

202/775-4510 (fax)

RILEY, WARNOCK & JACOBSON, PLC

STEVEN A. RILEY

JOHN R. JACOBSON

MILTON S. McGEE III

1906 West End Avenue

Nashville, TN 37203

Telephone: 615/3203700

615/320-3737 (fax)

Counsel for Nominal Defendant Community

Health Systems, Inc.

- 6 -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

NASHVILLE DIVISION


In re COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS,	)	Master Docket No. 3:11-cv-00489
INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE	)
LITIGATION	)	(Consolidated with No. 3:11-cv-00598 and
	)	No. 3:11-cv-00952)
	)
This Document Relates To:	)	Judge Kevin H. Sharp
	)
ALL ACTIONS.	)	Magistrate Judge Joe B. Brown
	)

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

^{This Stipulation of Settlement, dated November 18, 2016 (“Stipulation” or “Settlement”), is made and entered into by and among the following parties, and by and through
their respective counsel: (i) Plaintiffs Roofers Local No. 149 Pension Fund (the “Roofers”) and Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 630 Pension-Annuity Trust Fund (the “Plumbers”), in the action captioned
In re Community Health Systems, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, Master Docket No. 3:11-cv-00489 (the “Action”) (on behalf of themselves and
derivatively on behalf of Community Health Systems, Inc. (“CHSI” or the “Company”)); (ii) Defendants Wayne T. Smith, W. Larry Cash, John A. Clerico, John A. Fry, William Norris Jennings, Julia B. North, and H. Mitchell Watson,
Jr. (together, “Settling Defendants”); and (iii) Nominal Party CHSI (together, the “Settling Parties”). The Stipulation is intended by the Settling Parties to fully, finally and forever resolve, discharge and settle the
Released Claims (as defined below) upon Court approval and subject to the terms and conditions hereof.}

I.	BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE ACTION

Commencement and Consolidation of the Action

^{On May 24 and
June 21, 2011, respectively, plaintiffs Plumbers and Roofers filed shareholder derivative actions asserting claims on behalf of CHSI for alleged violations of law, including allegations that CHSI’s directors and certain of its officers
breached their fiduciary duties owed to the Company. On September 28, 2011, the Court consolidated the derivative actions and appointed Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP and Robbins Arroyo LLP as Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs. On
November 29, 2011, the Court further consolidated a derivative action captioned Sweat v. Smith, et al., No. 3:11-cv-00952, with the Plumbers’ and
Roofers’ actions.}

^{On March 15, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a Verified Amended Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint for Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Corporate
Waste and Unjust Enrichment (“Amended Consolidated Complaint”) (Dkt. No. 50). The Amended Consolidated Complaint alleged that Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by causing CHSI to adopt an unlawful inpatient admissions policy
to enable CHSI to artificially inflate reimbursement payments from Medicare, Medicaid and other payer sources, resulting in damages to the Company. Id., ¶¶2-7,
45-85.}

- 1 -

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Reconsideration

^{On May 14,
2012, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Consolidated Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. No. 53). In the Motion to Dismiss, Defendants argued, among other things, that the Amended Consolidated Complaint failed to
adequately plead futility of demand. Defendants also argued that the facts pleaded in the Amended Consolidated Complaint failed to state any actionable claim for relief. Id. On July 13, 2012, Plaintiffs filed an Opposition to the Motion
to Dismiss (“Opposition”) (Dkt. No. 58).}

^{On June 13, 2013,
the Court, the Honorable John T. Nixon presiding, conducted a hearing on the Motion to Dismiss. Thereafter, on September 27, 2013, the Court issued an Order denying in part and granting in part the Motion to Dismiss (“September 27, 2013
Order”) (Dkt. No. 87). More particularly, the Court ruled that Plaintiffs had adequately pleaded demand futility under Delaware law on their fiduciary duty claim, but not on their gross mismanagement, corporate waste, or unjust enrichment
claims.}

^{On October 14, 2013, Defendants filed a Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss
(“Motion for Reconsideration”) (Dkt. No. 89), which Plaintiffs opposed on October 30, 2013 (Dkt. No. 95). The Court denied the Motion for Reconsideration on December 22, 2014 (Dkt. No. 140). In particular, the
Court held that “Defendants have not presented sufficient grounds to reconsider its [the Court’s] decision to deny Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss with respect to Plaintiffs’ breach of fiduciary duties claim.”
Id. at 8.}

Discovery

^{On November 10,
2014, the Court, the Honorable Joe B. Brown, United States Magistrate Judge, presiding, conducted an Initial Case Management Conference. Following the Conference, the Court issued an Order establishing a
pre-trial schedule. Dkt. No. 136. Thereafter, the parties began to engage in a vigorous discovery process.}

^{As discovery
progressed, the parties served written discovery on each other, as well as issued subpoenas to third parties, and have briefed at least seven discovery-related issues for the Court. As of today, Plaintiffs have collected and reviewed approximately
2.7 million pages of documents and have deposed 39 witnesses, including most of the Settling Defendants, CHSI’s top executives and}

- 2 -

^{numerous hospital-level representatives. Similarly, Defendants obtained over 10,000
pages of documents from Plaintiffs and have deposed representatives from both Roofers and Plumbers. Finally, with an expert discovery period fast approaching, the Settling Parties engaged numerous expert witnesses who had begun to compile and review
materials in anticipation of drafting their respective reports.}^¹

Settlement Negotiations

^{On or about November
10, 2014, the Court also directed the parties to explore private resolution of the Action through mediation. The parties agreed to participate in a mediation before the Honorable Layn R. Phillips, United States District Judge (Ret.). The Court
directed pre-mediation discovery, which included CHSI’s production of all documents that the Company and its affiliates had provided to the Department of Justice in connection with related Government
subpoenas. The parties then participated in an in-person mediation session before Judge Phillips on April 17, 2015. This April 2015 mediation was unsuccessful.}

^{While the parties pushed forward with the litigation and discovery, the Settling Parties continued to talk about resolution with the help of Judge Phillips. After months of discovery and, nearing
the discovery cut-off set by the Court, the Settling Parties engaged in a second in-person mediation session with Judge Phillips on September 9, 2016. While the
Settling Parties did not reach an agreement to settle the Action at that session, the Settling Parties continued negotiations with the assistance of Judge Phillips in parallel with ongoing discovery. These efforts culminated with the Settling
Parties agreeing to settle this Action for a $60 million payment from the Settling Defendants’ insurance carriers and the Company agreeing to adopt meaningful corporate governance reforms relating to the issues raised by this Action,
subject to the negotiation of the terms of this Stipulation of Settlement and approval by the Court. The Settling Parties further agreed that $40}

¹ On October 5, 2016, Plaintiffs stipulated to the dismissal of defendant T. Mark Buford, and on October 12, Judge Sharp entered an order consistent with that stipulation. On October 25, 2016, Plaintiffs filed an unopposed motion to amend the complaint. Unlike the then-operative complaint, the proposed Second Amended Verified Consolidated Derivative Complaint did not name James S. Ely III as a defendant, and did not assert claims of gross mismanagement, corporate waste, or unjust enrichment. Magistrate Judge Brown granted the motion for leave to amend the same day, and Plaintiffs subsequently filed the Second Amended Verified Consolidated Derivative Complaint.

- 3 -

^{million of that settlement payment should be payable to the Company, and
$20 million should be payable to counsel for the Plaintiffs as attorneys’ fees and expenses, subject to Court approval.}

Approval of the Settlement by the CHSI Board

^{On November 2,
2016, the CHSI Board, exercising its business judgment, unanimously approved the Settlement and its terms as being in the best interest of CHSI and its stockholders.}

II.

CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFFS AND BENEFITS OF SETTLEMENT

^{Plaintiffs and
Plaintiffs’ Counsel believe that the claims asserted in the Action have merit. However, Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Counsel recognize and acknowledge the expense and length of continued proceedings necessary to prosecute the Action against
the Settling Defendants through trial and potential appeals. Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Counsel also have taken into account the uncertain outcome and the risk of any litigation, especially in a complex action such as this one, as well as the
difficulties and delays inherent in such litigation. Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Counsel also are mindful of the inherent problems of proof of, and possible defenses to, the claims asserted in the Action. Based on their evaluation, Plaintiffs
and Plaintiffs’ Counsel have determined that the Settlement set forth in this Stipulation is in the best interests of CHSI and its stockholders.}

III.

THE SETTLING DEFENDANTS’ DENIALS OF WRONGDOING AND LIABILITY

^{The Settling
Defendants have denied and continue to deny each and every one of the claims and contentions alleged by the Plaintiffs in the Action. The Settling Defendants expressly have denied and continue to deny all allegations of wrongdoing or liability
against them or any of them arising out of, based upon or related to any of the conduct, statements, acts or omissions alleged, or that could have been alleged, in the Action. Without limiting the foregoing, the Settling Defendants have denied and
continue to deny, among other things, that they breached their fiduciary duties or any other duty owed to CHSI or its stockholders, or that Plaintiffs, CHSI, or its stockholders suffered any damage or were harmed as a result of any conduct alleged
in the Action or otherwise. The Settling Defendants have further asserted and continue to assert that at all relevant times, they acted in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believed to be in the best interests of CHSI and its
stockholders.}

- 4 -

^{Nonetheless, the Settling Defendants also have taken into account the expense, uncertainty and risks inherent in any litigation, especially in a complex case like the Action. Therefore, the
Settling Defendants have determined that it is desirable and beneficial that the Action, and all of the Settling Parties’ disputes related thereto, be fully and finally settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in this
Stipulation. Pursuant to the terms set forth below, this Stipulation (including all of the Exhibits hereto) shall in no event be construed as or deemed to be evidence of an admission or concession by the Settling Defendants with respect to any claim
of fault, liability, wrongdoing, or damage whatsoever.}

IV.

TERMS OF STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT

^{NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the Plaintiffs (for themselves and derivatively on behalf of CHSI), the Settling Defendants, and CHSI, that in exchange for the
consideration set forth below, the Action and Released Claims shall be fully, finally and forever compromised, settled, discharged, relinquished and released, and the Action shall be dismissed with prejudice as to the Settling Defendants, upon and
subject to the following terms and conditions:}

Definitions

As used in this Stipulation the following terms have the meanings specified below:

^{1.1 “Action” means, collectively, the consolidated shareholder derivative action pending in the Middle District of Tennessee
under the caption In re Community Health Systems, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, Master Docket No. 3:11-cv-00489, pending before the Honorable Kevin H.
Sharp.}

^{1.2 “CHSI” means Community Health Systems, Inc., including, but not limited
to, its predecessors, successors, subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, and assigns.}

^{1.3
“Company Portion” means the balance of the Settlement Payment and any other sum in the Settlement Escrow after accounting for and deducting the Fee and Expense Amount.}

^{1.4 “Court” means the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.}

^{1.5 “Effective Date” means the first date by which all of the events and conditions specified in ¶6.1 of this Stipulation
have been met and have occurred.}

- 5 -

^{1.6 “Fee and Expense Amount” means $20,000,000, subject to Court approval.}

^{1.7 “Final” means the time when the Judgment has not been reversed, vacated, or modified in any way and is no longer subject
to appellate review, either because of disposition on appeal and conclusion of the appellate process or because of passage, without action, of time for seeking appellate review. More specifically, it is that situation when: (1) either no appeal
has been filed and the time has passed for any notice of appeal to be timely filed in the Action; or (2) an appeal has been filed and the court(s) of appeal has/have either affirmed the Judgment or dismissed that appeal and the time for any
reconsideration or further appellate review has passed and the appellate court mandate(s) has/have issued; or (3) a higher court has granted further appellate review and that court has either affirmed the underlying Judgment or affirmed the
court of appeal’s decision affirming the Judgment or dismissing the appeal.}

^{1.8
“Final Approval Order” means the Order Approving Derivative Settlement and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice, substantially in the form attached as Exhibit B hereto.}

^{1.9 “Judgment” means the judgment to be rendered by the Court in the Action upon its final approval of the Settlement,
substantially in the form attached as Exhibit C hereto.}

^{1.10
“Person” means an individual, corporation, limited liability company, professional corporation, limited liability partnership, partnership, limited partnership, association, joint venture, joint stock
company, estate, legal representative, trust, unincorporated association, government or any political subdivision or agency thereof, and any business or legal entity, and each of their spouses, heirs, predecessors, successors, representatives, or
assignees.}

^{1.11 “Plaintiffs” means collectively the Roofers and the Plumbers.}

^{1.12 “Plaintiffs’ Counsel” means any counsel that has appeared of record or rendered legal services to any of the Plaintiffs in
connection with the Action.}

^{1.13 “Related Parties” means (i) as to CHSI, CHSI’s past or present directors,
officers, managers, employees, partners, agents, attorneys, accountants, auditors, banks, insurers, co-insurers, re-insurers, consultants, experts, successors,
subsidiaries, divisions, joint ventures, assigns, general or limited partners or partnerships, limited liability companies, any entity in which CHSI has a controlling interest, and all officers, directors and employees of CHSI’s current and
former}

- 6 -

^{subsidiaries, and (ii) as to the Settling Defendants, (1) each spouse,
immediate family member, heir, executor, estate, administrator, agent, attorney, accountant, auditor, bank, insurer, co-insurer, re-insurer, advisor, consultant, expert, or affiliate of any of them,
(2) any trust in respect of which any Settling Defendant, or any spouse or family member thereof serves as a settlor, beneficiary or trustee, and (3) any entity in which a Settling Defendant, or any spouse or immediate family member
thereof, holds a controlling interest or for which a Settling Defendant has served as an employee, director, officer, managing director, advisor, general partner, limited partner, or member and any collective investment vehicle which is advised or
managed by any of them. For the sake of clarity, and without limitation, James S. Ely III and T. Mark Buford, each previously a defendant in this Action, are among the Related Parties.}

^{1.14 “Released Claims” means all claims, demands, rights, liabilities and claims for relief of every nature and description whatsoever,
known or unknown (as set forth below), that have been, and could have been, asserted in the Action by Plaintiffs, CHSI, or any CHSI stockholder derivatively on behalf of CHSI against the Settling Defendants, based on the Settling Defendants’
acts and/or omissions in connection with, arising out of, or relating to, the facts, transactions, events, matters, occurrences, acts, disclosures, statements, omissions or failures to act related to CHSI’s inpatient admission policies and
procedures that Plaintiffs allege violated certain federal laws through and including the date of execution of this Stipulation.}

^{1.15
“Released Persons” means the Settling Defendants, CHSI and their respective Related Parties.}

^{1.16
“Settlement” means the terms and conditions contained in this agreement.}

^{1.17
“Settling Defendants” means Wayne T. Smith, W. Larry Cash, John A. Clerico, John A. Fry, William Norris Jennings, Julia B. North, and H. Mitchell Watson, Jr.}

^{1.18 “Settling Parties” means, collectively, each of the Plaintiffs, the Settling Defendants and CHSI.}

^{1.19 “Stipulation” means this agreement.}

^{1.20
“Unknown Claims” means any Released Claims which Plaintiffs, CHSI or a CHSI stockholder does not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of the}

- 7 -

^{Released Persons, including claims which, if known by him, her or it, might have
affected his, her or its settlement with, and release of the Released Persons, or might have affected his, her or its decision not to object to this Settlement. With respect to any and all Released Claims, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree
that, upon the Effective Date, Plaintiffs, CHSI, and its stockholders shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, expressly waived, the provisions, rights and benefits of California Civil Code §1542, which
provides:}

A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.

^{Further, with respect to any and all
claims released pursuant to ¶¶4.1-4.3 below, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date, each of the Released Persons also shall expressly waive, and by operation of the
Judgment shall have expressly waived any and all provisions, rights and benefits conferred by any law of any jurisdiction or any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable or equivalent to
California Civil Code §1542. Plaintiffs, CHSI and each CHSI stockholder may hereafter discover facts in addition or different from those which he, she or it now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released
Claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist, or heretofore have existed upon any theory of law or equity now existing
or coming into existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct which is negligent, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different
or additional facts. The Settling Parties acknowledge, and the CHSI stockholders shall be deemed by operation of the Judgment to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and is a key element of the Settlement of
which this release is a part.}

^{2. Consideration}

^{2.1
In connection with the Settlement of the Action, the Insurers shall pay $60,000,000 in the aggregate (the “Settlement Payment”) in the manner described in ¶2.3. In addition, in connection with the settlement of the
Action, the CHSI Board shall adopt the corporate governance measures}

- 8 -

^{specified herein within thirty (30) days after the Final Approval Order for the
proposed Settlement is entered by the Court, and maintain such measures for at least four (4) years except in the event that public shareholders no longer hold 10% or more of the CHSI’s outstanding stock.}

^{2.2 CHSI acknowledges and agrees that the payment of the Company Portion and implementation of the corporate governance measures set forth in ¶2.4
below will confer substantial benefits upon CHSI and its stockholders. CHSI also acknowledges that the commencement, prosecution, and settlement of the Action were material and substantial factors in the Company’s ability to receive the Company
Portion and in the Board’s decision to adopt, implement, and maintain the corporate governance reforms set forth in ¶2.4 below.}

^{2.3
The Settlement Payment:}

^{(a)
Settling Defendants’ insurance carriers (the “Insurers”) shall pay or cause to be paid the Settlement Payment, no later than twenty-one (21) days following the later
of (i) entry of an order granting preliminary approval of the Settlement by the Court, and (ii) receipt by the Insurers in writing of all necessary instructions for payment by wire transfer or by check, including necessary W-9 forms (the “Funding Date”), directly into an interest-bearing escrow account (the “Settlement Escrow”) on terms agreed to by the Settling Parties in an escrow agreement governing the
Settlement Escrow (the “Escrow Agreement”). Counsel for the Company shall serve as the escrow agent for the Settlement Escrow (in such capacity, the “Escrow Agent”).}

^{(b) The Settling Parties acknowledge and agree that:}

^{(i) the amounts deposited in the Settlement Escrow, while on deposit therein, are not, and shall not be deemed to be, property of the estate of any Person (including, but
not limited to, any Settling Party or any Insurer) within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. §541 or any similar provision of any other law;}

^{(ii) each of the Settling Parties hereby disclaims, releases, and waives any right it may have to assert that it has any equitable title to any amount in the Settlement Escrow
other than each of the Settling Parties’ rights, if any, to receive from the Settlement Escrow the Company}

- 9 -

^{Portion or the Fee and Expense Amount, as applicable, as provided for in this
Stipulation, the Escrow Agreement, and the Final Approval Order;}

^{(iii) neither the Settling Defendants nor CHSI is funding any portion of the amounts being deposited into the Settlement Escrow;}

^{(iv) the commencement by or against any Settling Party of a case or proceeding under title 11 of the
United States Code, any state insolvency or receivership law, or any state law relating to general assignment for the benefit of creditors, composition, marshaling, or other similar arrangements and procedures, shall not operate to stay, terminate,
cancel, suspend, excuse, delay, impede, or otherwise interfere with or impair (x) the rights, if any, of the other Settling Parties to receive the Company Portion and the Fee and Expense Amount, as applicable, from the Escrow Account, as
applicable, pursuant to this Stipulation, the Escrow Agreement, and the Final Approval Order, or (y) the duties of the Escrow Agent under this Stipulation, the Escrow Agreement, and the Final Approval Order, including, but not limited to, the
Escrow Agent’s obligation to release the Company Portion and/or the Fee and Expense Amount consistent with ¶¶2.3(d) and 5.1 of this Stipulation;}

^{(v) the Settling Defendants shall not have any interest in any amounts deposited in the Settlement Escrow at any time;}

^{(vi) CHSI shall not have any interest in any amounts deposited in the Settlement Escrow
corresponding to the Fee and Expense Amount at any time;}

^{(vii) the Insurers shall have no interest in any amounts deposited in the Settlement Escrow at any time unless, until, and solely to the extent that any funds are due to the
Insurers pursuant to ¶¶2.3(d) and (e) and 5.2 below; and}

^{(viii) in the event of the entry of a final order of a court of competent jurisdiction determining that the payment of the Settlement Payment or any portion thereof by any Person is a
preferential transfer, voidable or avoidable transfer, fraudulent transfer, or similarly recoverable transaction and requiring any portion thereof to be returned, and such amount is not promptly deposited into the Settlement Escrow by the Settling
Defendants or others on their behalf, then, at the election of Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs may move the Court to vacate and set aside the Judgment,}

- 10 -

^{in which event the Settling Parties, Released Persons, and Related Parties shall be
restored to their respective positions that existed immediately prior to October 23, 2016.}

^{(c)
None of the Settling Parties shall have any right, title, or interest in or to, or possession of, the Settlement Escrow, and therefore shall not have the ability to pledge, convey, hypothecate, or grant as security all or any
portion of the funds in the Settlement Escrow, unless and until, and solely to the extent that, any such funds have been released from escrow pursuant to this Stipulation and the applicable escrow agreement and received by a Settling Party. The
Escrow Agent shall be in sole possession of the funds therein solely in its capacity as such, and shall not act as custodian of the Settling Parties for purposes of perfecting a security interest therein, and no creditor of any of the Settling
Parties shall have any right to have or to hold or otherwise attach or seize all or any portion of either of the Settlement Escrow as collateral for or in satisfaction of any obligation, and shall not be able to obtain a security interest in any of
the funds in the Settlement Escrow unless and until, and solely to the extent that, any such funds have been released from escrow pursuant to this Stipulation and the applicable escrow agreement and received by a Settling Party.}

^{(d) The Escrow Agent shall pay the Company Portion, as defined above, to the Company or its designee fourteen (14) calendar days after entry of the Final
Approval Order, without further action or authorization by or on behalf of Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs’ Counsel, the Company, or any of the Settling Parties other than notifying the Escrow Agent of the entry of such order, notwithstanding the
existence of any timely filed objections thereto, or potential for appeal therefrom, or collateral attack on the Settlement or any part thereof. If the Settling Parties fail to obtain entry of the Final Approval Order within 180 calendar days of the
Funding Date (the “Approval Deadline”), or if the Final Approval Order is subsequently overturned by an order or judgment that is not subject to further approval, appeal, reconsideration, rehearing, or review, in either circumstance for
any reason, the Company shall be obligated to refund or repay (or to cause to be refunded or repaid) the Company Portion and any Fee and Expense Amount that has been disbursed as Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and expenses (the “Refund
Amount”), to the Insurers, within}

- 11 -

^{fourteen (14) calendar days after the date such order or judgment ceases to be
subject to further approval, appeal, reconsideration, rehearing, or review (the “Refund Date”).}

^{(e)
Notwithstanding ¶2.3(d) above, if the parties re-file in a court of competent jurisdiction prior to any Refund Date a renewed motion for preliminary or final approval of the
Settlement to which the Insurers have provided prior written consent (not to be unreasonably withheld), the Company’s obligation to repay or refund the Refund Amount to Insurers shall be suspended, and the Approval Deadline for final and non-appealable approval of the Settlement shall be reset to 90 calendar days after the date of such filing. If the parties fail to obtain such final approval by the reset Approval Deadline, or if any such approval
of the Settlement is subsequently overturned by a final order or judgment that is not subject to further approval, appeal, reconsideration, rehearing, or review, in each case for any reason, the Company shall be obligated to refund or repay (or to
cause to be refunded or repaid) the Refund Amount to the Insurers within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date such order or judgment ceases to be subject to further approval, appeal, reconsideration, rehearing, or review.}

^{(f) The Settling Defendants represent and warrant, with respect to the Settlement Payment made or to be made by the Insurers on their behalf, at the time of
entering into this Stipulation and at the time the Settlement Payment is made, that neither they nor any Person contributing to the Settlement Payment on their behalf are insolvent, nor will the payment of the Settlement Payment by them or on their
behalf render them insolvent, within the meaning of and/or for the purposes of title 11 of the United States Code (including, but not limited to, sections 101 and 547 thereof). The foregoing representation is made by each of the Settling Defendants
and not by their counsel.}

^{2.4 The Corporate Governance Reforms:}

^I.

^{CHSI BOARD OF DIRECTORS
(“BOARD”)}

^{1. Shareholder Nominated Directors. CHSI’s Governance and Nominating Committee shall work with plaintiffs’ corporate
governance expert to secure the names of six mutually acceptable candidates for election to the Board who have no prior connection to the}

- 12 -

^{Company, its directors, or to its senior officers. The candidates shall be additional
independent directors and will have expertise and experience with accounting issues and compliance. The Board shall then select two of these candidates to recommend for election at the next shareholders meeting.}

^{(a) The
procedure for identifying and nominating directors shall be:}

^{(i) The
designee of the Governance and Nominating Committee together with plaintiffs’ corporate governance expert, shall establish an objective set of criteria to be utilized in conducting the canvassing efforts detailed below;}

^{(ii) Each
individual or entity holding more than at least 1% of CHSI’s common stock for a period of no less than one year, other than individuals who are current employees of CHSI, shall be jointly contacted by a representative of both CHSI and
plaintiffs’ corporate governance expert for the purpose of requesting that such shareholder(s) provide the name(s) of prospective candidates for the Board;}

^{(iii) An
appropriate review, including background information and interviews of prospective candidates, shall be conducted with respect to all candidates who express their consent to being considered and to serving as a director. No less than six candidates
deemed qualified by the designated representative of CHSI and plaintiffs’ corporate governance expert shall be sent to the Governance and Nominating Committee for review;}

^{(iv) The Governance and Nominating Committee shall identify two candidates from those submitted for review, based on the business judgment of the
committee’s members and input from plaintiffs’ corporate governance expert;}

^{(v) In
the event that fewer than two candidates are nominated, the process detailed in §I.1.(a) above shall be repeated sequentially and two}

- 13 -

^{additional candidates shall be sent to the Governance and Nominating Committee for
review and the Governance and Nominating Committee shall select from the candidates until both positions are filled;}

^{(vi) Once
the candidates are identified by the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board shall, subject to its fiduciary duties, nominate the candidates for election to the Board or, if no shareholders’ meeting is scheduled in the next ninety
(90) days, the Board shall elect the candidates to fill any Board vacancies until such meeting is held and the candidates can be voted upon by shareholders;}

^{(vii) If,
during the four years that this Agreement is in force, either of the two shareholder-nominated directors is no longer able to serve on the Board, or the Board in exercise of its business judgment can no longer nominate such director(s), the process
described in §I.1.(a)(i)-(vi) above shall be repeated for the selection of a replacement director.}

^{2.
Lead Independent Director. The Board shall designate one of the independent directors as the “Lead Director.”}

^{3. In
addition to the duties of all Board members, the “Lead Director” shall be responsible for the following functions:}

^{(a) Seeking
input from all directors as to the preparation of the agendas for CHSI Board and committee meetings.}

^{(b) Advising
the Board as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information from CHSI’s management that is necessary for the directors to effectively and responsibly perform their duties.}

^{(c) Assisting
CHSI’s officers along with the Board of Directors’ Audit and Compliance Committee in assuring compliance with and implementation of all applicable state and federal healthcare laws, including but not limited to, Medicare}

- 14 -

^{and Medicaid laws, rules and regulations, and for revisions to CHSI’s policies,
procedures and practices for compliance with and implementation of same.}

^{(d) Developing
the agenda for, and moderate executive sessions of, the Board and act as principal liaison between the Board and management on sensitive issues.}

^{(e) Evaluating,
along with the members of the Compensation Committee, the CEO’s performance and meeting with the CEO to discuss such evaluation.}

^{4. Director
Compensation. The Board shall amend the Compensation Committee’s Charter to require that the Compensation Committee be comprised solely of independent directors.}

^{5. The Board shall adopt a policy providing for the following types and restrictions on director’s compensation:}

^{(a) At
least one-half of directors’ annual fees shall be paid in stock, provided that this amount may be reduced by any restricted stock awards granted to a director. In addition, directors shall be required to
maintain ownership of stock in the company equal to five (5) times the value of the individual’s annual base salary if a company executive or five (5) times the value of the director’s annual fees if a non-executive director.}

^{(b) Aside
from meeting-related expenses such as airfare, hotel accommodations and modest travel/accident insurance, directors shall receive no other perquisites. Health, life and other forms of insurance, financial planning, automotive allowances and similar
perquisites shall not be provided as benefits to directors.}

^{(c) Non-employee directors shall not be eligible to receive any change-in-control
payments or severance arrangements of any kind.}

- 15 -

^II.

^{ESTABLISHMENT OF A HEALTHCARE
LAW COMPLIANCE COORDINATOR}

^{1. Subject
to the approval of the Inspector General’s Office of HHS, the Board shall hire or appoint a Healthcare Law Compliance Coordinator (“Compliance Coordinator”), who will work with the Company’s CCO to coordinate and oversee
implementation of the Company’s compliance programs, with particular emphasis on Medicare and Medicaid compliance programs.}

^{2. The
Compliance Coordinator shall hold a juris doctor and/or Masters (or higher degree) in Health Administration and have substantial knowledge of, and experience with, the type of compliance issues historically and/or routinely experienced by CHSI,
with a particular emphasis on Medicare and Medicaid compliance.}

^{3. The
Compliance Coordinator shall meet with CHSI’s CCO at least bi-monthly regarding the Company’s policies, procedures, and practices designed to ensure Medicare and Medicaid compliance, and shall work
with the CCO to create quarterly reports regarding compliance matters.}

^{4. The
Compliance Coordinator shall report directly to the CEO and shall meet with both the Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors and the General Counsel at least quarterly to review and act upon the quarterly reports prepared by the
Compliance Coordinator and the CCO. The Compliance Coordinator shall also report to the Audit and Compliance Committee as requested, including when requested to provide assistance in connection with any investigation or review of a potential
violation of law or in connection with any review of CHSI’s Medicare and Medicaid billing policies or procedures.}

^{5. The
Board, with input from the Compliance Coordinator and the CCO, shall review the existing Code of Conduct and Medicare and Medicaid Compliance Program on an annual basis and approve amendments, if needed. The Program, Compliance Code and Code of
Conduct, as well as all other CHSI’s ethics or legal policies, and any amendments or upgrades to the Code of Conduct and Medicare and Medicaid Compliance Program shall be immediately distributed to all CHSI directors, officers and relevant
employees, agents or}

- 16 -

^{independent contractors, as appropriate. In addition, the Code of Conduct shall be
posted on the Company’s website and intranet.}

^{6. The
Compliance Coordinator or his designee shall conduct bi-annual reviews of the Medicare and Medicaid Compliance Program and shall conduct at least annually unannounced visits to 10% of the Company’s then
existing hospitals/facilities as of the beginning of each calendar year (on a rotating basis) to ensure compliance. The Compliance Coordinator shall conduct at least six unannounced visits to Company hospitals annually. The Compliance Coordinator
shall prepare written reports regarding the bi-annual reviews and any results or conclusions reached concerning the compliance status. These bi-annual reports shall be
provided to the Board and maintained by the Company’s General Counsel within the legal department for a period of at least ten (10) years.}

^{7. CHSI’s
Corporate Compliance Directors shall be the liaison between each hospital or facility from which CHSI conducts operations and the CCO. The Company’s Corporate Compliance Directors shall provide monthly written reports to the CCO concerning the
compliance status of hospitals within their respective divisions, and communicate orally with the CCO at least bimonthly.}

^{8. In
addition to the bi-annual reports, the Compliance Coordinator shall provide a written report to the Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board, the CEO, General Counsel at least quarterly (before the
issuance of the Company’s SEC Form 10-Q filings) concerning the functioning of the Medicare and Medicaid Compliance Program and the Code of Conduct (and any potential or actual violations thereof). These
reports shall be maintained as exhibits to the Audit and Compliance Committee Board minutes, and such minutes shall be maintained by the Company’s General Counsel within the legal department for a period of at least ten
(10) years.}

^{9. In addition to the presentation of the bi-annual reports,
the Compliance Coordinator shall have the right to attend and speak at each meeting of the Board (or any committee thereof) regarding the functioning of the Medicare and Medicaid Compliance Program.}

- 17 -

^{10. The Compliance Coordinator shall be responsible for oversight of CHSI’s Disclosure Program (including the Hotline and Log) and shall be responsible for
providing documentation concerning the Disclosure Hotline (and log) to the Audit and Compliance Committee.}

III.

CONFIDENTIAL DISCLOSURE PROGRAM

^{1. The
Compliance Coordinator shall review and oversee the confidential disclosure mechanisms in CHSI’s current policy to ensure that:}

^{(a) The
policy makes clear that the confidential disclosure provisions are designed to report any potential or actual suspected violation of the federal and/or state healthcare laws, including but not limited to, the Medicare and/or Medicaid laws, rules
and regulations, and not simply to report violations of internal CHSI policies.}

^{(b) In
addition to the other existing mechanisms for reporting a complaint, the reporting person (i.e., the “disclosing person”) shall be directed to report the matter to an independent party (the “Third Party”) retained by the Company
to receive such complaints by mail or e-mail. Such complaints may be anonymous, but the Board shall encourage the disclosing persons to reveal their identity to permit a more efficient and timely resolution of
the matter. The Board shall also have the power, at its discretion, to reward employees who come forward within the Company and promptly bring meritorious complaints and concerns to the Company’s attention.}

^{(c) All
complaints received by the Third Party shall be forwarded in writing (translated into English where necessary) to the CCO who shall promptly investigate each complaint.}

- 18 -

^{(d) The log of Disclosure complaints as well as the results of all investigations of complaints shall be memorialized in writing and maintained by the
Compliance Coordinator for a period of not less than ten (10) years. The Company shall require its external auditor to review the log and investigation results in connection with each annual audit.}

^{(e) Where
the disclosing person has identified him/her/itself in a complaint, the Compliance Coordinator shall notify the disclosing person when the investigation or evaluation of the complaint is complete and the results thereof. If the disclosing person
does not believe his/her/its report was properly explained or resolved, he/she/it may contact the full Board and CHSI’s external auditor concerning the complaint.}

^{(f) All contact information and reporting directions shall be conspicuously and widely posted by CHSI on its website and elsewhere, as to be available not only
to CHSI employees but also to patients, vendors and other third parties.}

IV.

CLAWBACK IN THE EVENT OF RESTATEMENT

^{1. CHSI
shall modify its claw-back policy to require the Company to “claw-back” any compensation paid to CEO or CFO for any accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of CHSI with any financial reporting requirement under the
federal and/or state securities laws. For any such accounting restatement, CHSI shall recoup all incentive-based compensation (calculated as the excess amount paid on the basis of the restated results) paid to such officer(s) during the two-year period preceding the date the Company is required to prepare the restatement.}

- 19 -

^{2. The modified “ClawBack” policy shall also require the Company to “claw-back” compensation as described herein regardless of
any lesser “claw-back” obligations enacted by the United States Securities & Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Act.}

^{3. The claw-back provision set forth above shall be incorporated into all future employment agreements with any CEO or CFO, and all current
employment agreements with the current CEO and CFO shall be amended to incorporate these provisions. Additionally, until the Company begins entering into written employment agreements with its executive officers, the claw-back provisions set forth
above shall be incorporated into separate written agreements between the Company and its applicable executive officers (including requiring executives to voluntarily repay compensation when necessary under these provisions). The Board shall not hire
and/or shall terminate any executives who do not agree to such amendments.}

INSIDER TRADING CONTROLS

^{1. The
Board shall appoint a management level committee consisting of CHSI’s CFO and General Counsel, which committee shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with CHSI’s stock trading. The committee will be designated the “Trading
Compliance Committee,” and shall be responsible for developing (with Board involvement), present to the Board for approval, and monitoring and updating (with Board involvement and approval) a comprehensive program designed to ensure compliance
with CHSI’s insider stock trading policy (“Trading Compliance Policy”).}

^{2. The
Board shall be responsible for direct oversight of the Trading Compliance Program and the members of the Board will have direct access to the Trading Compliance Committee, including the opportunity to meet with the Trading Compliance
Committee}

- 20 -

^{outside the presence of any other members of management. At least once a year, the non-executive members of the Board shall receive a report from the Trading Compliance Committee.}

^{3. CHSI
shall not buy back stock from any Section 16 officer or any director in the open market or otherwise, except in connection with the payment of taxes relating to the vesting of restricted stock.}

^{4. Any
director or elected officer who acquires CHSI shares via option exercise, shall retain 100% of the net shares acquired, after taking into account the sale of shares to pay taxes and the option exercise price, for at least 12 months or such earlier
time as the individual ceases to be a director or officer of CHSI or until such time as the individual satisfies the stock ownership metrics set forth in §I.5(a) above (or in the case of an officer, the stock ownership metrics set forth in
CHSI’s Governance Guidelines posted on its website).}

VI.

POLITICAL EXPENDITURE DISCLOSURE POLICY

^{The
Board shall adopt the following Political Contribution Policy (“Policy”).}

^{1. Statement
of Policy}

^{(a) CHSI acknowledges that existing and proposed laws, legislation, regulations and policy initiatives,
including but not limited to those regarding the federal and state healthcare laws, may have a significant impact on CHSI and its operations. As such, CHSI may engage in transparent and responsible participation in the political process at the U.S.
federal and/or state level.}

^{(b) CHSI’s
political contributions shall be subject to the approval of senior management and oversight by the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors.}

- 21 -

^{(c) No CHSI resources, including but not limited to, the use of Company premises, use of Company equipment, or monetary payments, may be contributed
to any political candidate, political committee political party, ballot measure committee, or to other organization for use in making Political Expenditures without specific approval and disclosure if applicable as set forth under this
Policy.}

^{(d) For the purpose of this Policy, the term “Political Expenditures” shall mean all
monetary and non-monetary payments that CHSI intended to be used, or had reason to believe would be used, to participate in or influence public opinion with respect to any political campaign on behalf of or in
opposition to any candidate for public office or any voter referenda ballot measures, including but not limited to all funds meeting the above description that were provided to any candidate, candidate committee, political organization, political
party, business association, advocacy organization, educational group, media organization, political action committee, or any other comparable entity, whether or not it qualifies as a 501(c)(4) organization.}

^{2. Promotion
of Company Interests}

^{(a) All Political Expenditures made with CHSI funds or resources shall be used solely to promote the interests
of the Company, and shall be made without regard for the personal political preferences of CHSI’s directors, officers, employees, independent contractors and/or agents.}

^{3. Approvals}

^{(a) No
Political Expenditures shall be made using CHSI funds or resources to, or in support of, any political candidate, political campaign, political party, political committee, or public official in any country, or to any other}

- 22 -

^{organization for use in making Political Expenditures, unless the contribution is lawful
and expressly authorized in writing by the Company’s CEO, CFO, and General Counsel, to ensure consistency with CHSI’s business objectives and public policy priorities.}

^{(b) Any employee who believes that a payment using CHSI funds that the employee has requested may be used in making Political Expenditures must
contact the General Counsel to determine whether the payment requires the approvals specified in the preceding paragraph.}

^{4. Oversight}

^{(a) The Governance and Nominating Committee of the CHSI Board of Directors shall be responsible for
overseeing CHSI’s political activity and contributions, including Political Expenditures to trade associations or other organizations, to ensure consistency with the Company’s business objectives and public policy priorities.}

^{(b) The
Governance and Nominating Committee shall no less than annually receive and review a report on CHSI’s political contributions and expenditures.}

^{(c) The
Governance and Nominating Committee shall also annually review this Policy.}

^{5. Federal
Political Contributions}

^{(a) CHSI shall not make any corporate contributions to federal candidates, federal campaign
committees, national political party committees, and all other federal political committees.}

- 23 -

^{(b) CHSI shall not make contributions to “federal independent expenditure-only committees” as that term is defined by the Federal Election
Commission.}

^{6. State Political Contributions}

^{(a) Where
permitted by law, and with the required internal approvals set forth above in §VI.3, CHSI may participate in the political process at the state level by contributing to political candidates, political parties, political committees and ballot
initiatives.}

^{(b) Information concerning any such political contributions will be posted to CHSI’s website
pursuant to §VI.7 herein, and shall be updated at least quarterly. If CHSI chooses to make a contribution to a political committee that is a state or local independent expenditure-only committee, and the contribution would be publicly disclosed
as required by law on state election agency websites, then the same information will also be posted to and maintained on CHSI’s website pursuant to §VI.7 herein.}

^{7. Internet and Website Disclosure}

^{(a) To
ensure that CHSI’s political activities are transparent to all CHSI stakeholders, the Company shall disclose political activities as follows:}

^{(i) CHSI
shall post to its website within 30 days of any applicable state reporting and disclosure obligation or within 90 days of any applicable reporting requirement greater than quarterly, any monetary and nonmonetary corporate contributions to political
candidates, political parties, organizations intending to influence the outcome of ballot measures, and other political}

- 24 -

^{organizations established under Section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code, including
recipient names and amounts given.}

^{(ii) CHSI
shall post to its website and update within 30 days all contributions made by CHSI’s federal political action committee, and by any state or local political action committees established by CHS, including recipient names and amounts
given.}

^{3. Settlement Procedures}

^{3.1
After execution of this Stipulation, Plaintiffs shall submit the Stipulation together with its Exhibits to the Court and shall move for entry of an order substantially in the form of Exhibit A hereto (the
“Preliminary Approval Order”), requesting, among other things, the preliminary approval of the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation, and approval for the filing and publication of the Settlement Notice, substantially in the forms
attached hereto as Exhibits A-1 (“Notice”) and A-2 (“Summary Notice”; the Notice and Summary Notice collectively, the “Settlement Notice”),
which shall include the general terms of the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation and the date of the Settlement Hearing as described below.}

^{3.2
The parties agree to file a motion with the Court seeking to expedite a hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Settlement.}

^{3.3
Within five (5) business days of the issuance by the Court of an Order preliminarily approving the Settlement, CHSI shall cause the Stipulation and Notice to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission via a
Form 8-K, shall publish the Summary Notice for one day in}^{Investor’s Business Daily}^{, and shall post the Stipulation and Notice on CHSI’s website at www.chs.net/investor-relations/ such that visitors to the
“Investors” section of the website, until entry of the Final Approval Order, will readily find a hyperlink to the Notice. The Company shall pay for reasonable costs, if any, of providing reasonable notice of the Settlement, in the form
approved by the Court.}

^{3.4 Plaintiffs will also request that forty-five (45) calendar days after the Settlement Notice is
disseminated, the Court hold a hearing (the “Settlement Hearing”) to consider and}

- 25 -

^{determine whether the Final Approval Order and the Judgment, substantially in the forms
of Exhibits B and C hereto, should be entered: (a) approving the terms of the Settlement as fair, reasonable and adequate; and (b) dismissing with prejudice the Action against the Settling Defendants.}

^{3.5 Pending the Effective Date, all proceedings and discovery in the Action shall be stayed except as otherwise provided herein, and the Settling
Parties shall not file or prosecute any other Action or proceedings relating to the Settlement.}

^{4.
Releases}

^{4.1 Upon the Effective Date, CHSI, each of CHSI’s stockholders and the Plaintiffs (acting on their own behalf and derivatively on behalf of
CHSI), for good and sufficient consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and discharged and
dismissed with prejudice the Released Claims against the Released Persons and any and all causes of action or claims (including Unknown Claims) that have and could have been asserted in the Action by Plaintiffs, CHSI or any CHSI stockholder
derivatively on behalf of CHSI against the Settling Defendants or the Released Persons, based on the Settling Defendants’ acts and/or omissions in connection with, arising out of, or relating to, the facts, transactions, events, matters,
occurrences, acts, disclosures, statements, omissions or failures to act at issue in this Action, through and including the date of execution of this Stipulation, including claims arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the defense,
settlement, or resolution of the Action. Nothing herein shall in any way impair or restrict the rights of any Settling Party to enforce the terms of the Stipulation.}

^{4.2
Upon the Effective Date, Plaintiffs (acting on their own behalf and derivatively on behalf of CHSI and its stockholders), CHSI and any Person acting on behalf of CHSI, for good and sufficient consideration, the receipt
and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, shall be forever barred and enjoined from commencing, instituting or prosecuting any of the Released Claims against any of the Released Persons or any action or other proceeding against any of the
Released Persons arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the Released Claims, the Action, or the filing,}

- 26 -

^{prosecution, defense, settlement, or resolution of the Action. Nothing herein shall in
any way impair or restrict the rights of any Settling Party to enforce the terms of the Stipulation.}

^{4.3
Upon the Effective Date, each of the Released Persons and the Related Parties, for good and sufficient consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of
the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and discharged each and all of the Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Counsel and all current CHSI stockholders (solely in their capacity as CHSI stockholders) from all claims
(including Unknown Claims) arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the institution, prosecution, assertion, settlement or resolution of the Action or the Released Claims. Nothing herein shall in any way impair or restrict the rights of
any Settling Party to enforce the terms of the Stipulation.}

^{5.
Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s Separately Negotiated Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses}

^{5.1
The Escrow Agent shall pay the Fee and Expense Amount, as defined above, from the Escrow Account to Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, as receiving agent for Plaintiffs’ Counsel, within fourteen (14) calendar
days after entry of the Final Approval Order, without further action or authorization by or on behalf of Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs’ Counsel, the Company, or any of the Settling Parties other than notifying the Escrow Agent of the entry of such
order, notwithstanding the existence of any timely filed objections thereto, or potential for appeal therefrom, or collateral attack on the Settlement or any part thereof. If final approval of the Settlement is subsequently overturned for any
reason, by an order or judgment that is not subject to further approval, appeal, reconsideration, rehearing, or review, then within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date such order or judgment ceases to be subject to further approval, appeal,
reconsideration, rehearing, or review (the “Fee Refund Date”), Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall be severally obligated to refund or repay to the Escrow Account (or if such account has been terminated, to CHSI or its successor in interest),
the Fee and Expense Amount.}

^{5.2 Notwithstanding ¶5.1 above, if the parties re-file
in a court of competent jurisdiction prior to any Fee Refund Date a renewed motion for preliminary or final approval of the Settlement to which the Insurers have provided prior written consent (not to be unreasonably withheld),
Plaintiffs’}

- 27 -

^{Counsel’s obligation to repay or refund the Fee and Expense Amount to the
Settlement Escrow shall be suspended, and the Fee Refund Date shall be reset to 90 calendar days after the date of such filing. If the parties fail to obtain such final approval by the reset Fee Refund Date, or if any such approval of the Settlement
is overturned by an order or judgment that is not subject to further approval, appeal, reconsideration, rehearing, or review, in either circumstance for any reason, Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall be severally obligated to refund or repay the Fee and
Expense Amount to the Settlement Escrow (or if such account has been terminated, to CHSI or its successor in interest) within fourteen (14) calendar days after such order or judgment ceases to be subject to further approval, appeal, reconsideration,
rehearing, or review.}

^{5.3 Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall consent to the jurisdiction and venue of the U.S. District Court
for the Middle District of Tennessee, or of any other court of competent jurisdiction in Davidson County, Tennessee, in any action to obtain any refund, repayment or indemnification provided for in ¶¶5.1 & 5.2 above.}

^{5.4 Neither CHSI nor the Settling Defendants shall have any responsibility or liability whatsoever with respect to the allocation of the
attorneys’ fees awarded in this matter among Plaintiffs’ Counsel, or any other counsel representing Plaintiffs, or any other individual or entity asserting a right to recover any portion of the attorneys’ fees awarded. Any dispute
regarding any allocation of fees or expenses among Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall have no effect on the Settlement.}

^{6.
Conditions of Settlement; Effect of Disapproval, Cancellation or Termination}

^{6.1
The Effective Date shall be conditioned on the occurrence of all of the following events:}

^{(a)
the CHSI Board of Directors has approved the Settlement and each of its terms, including the separately negotiated Fee and Expense Amount;}

^{(b)
the Court has entered the Final Approval Order and Judgment, substantially in the forms of Exhibits B and C attached hereto; and}

^{(c)
the Judgment has become Final.}

- 28 -

^{6.2 If any of the conditions specified in ¶6.1 are not met, or if preliminary approval for this Settlement is not obtained on or before December 9,
2016, then the Stipulation of Settlement shall be canceled and terminated subject to the provisions of ¶¶6.2 & 6.3, unless counsel for the Settling Parties mutually agree in writing to proceed with a renewed, alternative, or modified
Stipulation and submit it for Court approval. If for any reason the Effective Date does not occur, or if this Stipulation is terminated, or is cancelled, or otherwise fails to become effective for any reason:}

^{(d) The Settling Parties, Released Persons and Related Parties shall be restored to their respective positions that existed immediately prior to
October 23, 2016;}

^{(e) All negotiations, proceedings, documents prepared and statements made in connection with this Stipulation
shall be without prejudice to the Settling Parties, shall not be deemed or construed to be an admission by a Settling Party of any act, matter, or proposition and shall not be used in any manner for any purpose (other than to enforce the terms
remaining in effect) in any subsequent proceeding in the Action or in any other action or proceeding; and}

^{(f)
The terms and provisions of the Stipulation, with the exception of the provisions of ¶5.1, ¶5.2 and ¶6.2 shall have no further force and effect with respect to the Settling Parties and shall not be used in
the Action or in any other proceeding for any purpose, and any judgment or orders entered by the Court in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation shall be treated as vacated, nunc pro tunc.}

^{6.3 No order of the Court or modification or reversal on appeal of any order of the Court concerning the amount of attorneys’ fees, costs, expenses and
interest awarded by the Court to Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall constitute grounds for cancellation or termination of the Stipulation, affect the enforceability of the Stipulation, or delay or preclude the Judgment from becoming Final.}

^{7. Miscellaneous Provisions}

^{7.1
The Settling Parties (a) acknowledge that it is their intent to consummate the terms and conditions of this Stipulation; and (b) agree to cooperate to the extent reasonably necessary to effectuate and implement all terms
and conditions of the Stipulation and to exercise their best efforts to accomplish the foregoing terms and conditions of the Stipulation.}

- 29 -

^{7.2 The Settling Parties intend this Settlement to be a final and complete resolution of all Released Claims between Plaintiffs and CHSI and its stockholders,
on the one hand, and the Released Persons, on the other hand. The Settlement compromises claims that are contested and shall not be deemed an admission by any Settling Party or Released Person as to the merits of any claim, allegation or defense.
The Final Approval Order shall contain a finding that during the course of the litigation, the parties and their respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and all other similar
laws. The Settling Parties further agree that the Released Claims are being settled voluntarily after consultation with competent legal counsel and an experienced mediator.}

^{7.3
Pending the Effective Date, the Settling Parties agree not to initiate any proceedings concerning the Released Claims other than those incident to the settlement itself; provided, however, that CHSI and the Settling Defendants may
seek to prevent or stay any other action or claims brought seeking to assert any Released Claims.}

^{7.4
Any Settlement documentation, the Settlement, the Stipulation and any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of any of the foregoing: (a) shall not be deemed to be or be offered, attempted to be
offered or used in any way by the parties as a presumption, a concession or an admission of, or evidence of, any fault, wrongdoing or liability of the parties or the validity of any of the claims released in the Settlement; and (b) are not
intended by the parties to be offered or received as evidence or used by any other person in any other actions or proceedings, whether civil, criminal or administrative, except as may be necessary to effectuate the Settlement or enforce a
party’s rights under the Settlement. Neither this Stipulation nor the Settlement shall be admissible in any proceeding for any purpose, except to enforce the terms of the Settlement, and except that the Released Persons may file or use the
Stipulation, the Final Approval Order and/or the Judgment in any action that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, full faith and credit, release,
good faith settlement, standing, judgment bar or reduction or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim.}

- 30 -

^{7.5 This Stipulation shall survive any Change of Control of the Company, regardless of the effect a change in control will otherwise have on the litigation,
including on the Corporate Governance Provisions provided for herein. For purposes of this Paragraph, “Change of Control” means the sale of all or substantially all the assets of the Company; any merger, consolidation or acquisition of the
Company with, by or into another corporation, entity or person; or any change in the ownership of more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting capital stock of the Company in one or more related transactions.}

^{7.6 All agreements made and orders entered during the course of the Action relating to the confidentiality of information or sealing of documents shall survive
this Stipulation and the Judgment.}

^{7.7 All Exhibits to this Stipulation are material and integral parts hereof and are fully incorporated herein by
this reference.}

^{7.8 This Stipulation may be amended or modified only by a written instrument signed by or on behalf of all
Settling Parties or their respective successors-in-interest.}

^{7.9
This Stipulation and the Exhibits attached hereto constitute the entire agreement among the Settling Parties and no representations, warranties or inducements have been made to any Settling Party concerning the Stipulation and/or
any of its Exhibits, other than the representations, warranties and covenants contained and memorialized in such documents. The Stipulation supersedes and replaces any prior or contemporaneous writing, statement or understanding pertaining to the
Action and no parole or other evidence may be offered to explain, construe, contradict or clarify its terms, the intent of the Settling Parties or their counsel, or the circumstances under which the Stipulation was made or executed. It is understood
by the Settling Parties that, except for matters expressly represented herein, the facts or law with respect to which this Stipulation is entered into may turn out to be other than or different from the facts now known to each party or believed by
such party to be true; each party therefore expressly assumes the risk of facts or law turning out to be different, and agrees that this Stipulation shall be in all respects effective and not subject to termination by reason of any such different
facts or law.}

- 31 -

^{7.10 Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, all parties, including all Settling Defendants, their counsel, CHSI and its counsel, and Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’
Counsel, shall bear their own fees, costs, and expenses.}

^{7.11
Counsel for the Settling Parties are expressly authorized by their respective clients to take all appropriate action required or permitted to be taken pursuant to the Stipulation to effectuate its terms and conditions.}

^{7.12 Plaintiffs represent and warrant they have not assigned or transferred, or attempted to assign or transfer, to any Person any Released Claim or any portion thereof or
interest therein.}

^{7.13 Each counsel or other Person executing this Stipulation or any of its Exhibits on behalf of any party hereto hereby
warrants that such Person has the full authority to do so.}

^{7.14
Any failure by any party to this Stipulation to insist upon the strict performance by any other party of any of the provisions of the Stipulation shall not be deemed a waiver of any of the provisions, and such party, notwithstanding such
failure, shall have the right thereafter to insist upon the strict performance of any and all of the provisions of the Stipulation to be performed by such other party.}

^{7.15
The Stipulation and Exhibits may be executed in one or more counterparts. A faxed or PDF signature shall be deemed an original signature for purposes of this Stipulation. All executed counterparts including facsimile and/or PDF
counterparts shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. A complete set of counterparts, either originally executed or copies thereof, shall be filed with the Court.}

^{7.16
This Stipulation shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the Settling Parties and the Released Persons and their respective successors, assigns, heirs, spouses, marital communities, executors, administrators, trustees in
bankruptcy and legal representatives.}

^{7.17 Without affecting the finality of the Judgment entered in accordance with this Stipulation, the Court shall retain
jurisdiction with respect to implementation and enforcement of the terms of the Stipulation, the Final Approval Order, and the Judgment, and the Settling Parties hereto submit to the jurisdiction of the Court for purposes of implementing and
enforcing the Settlement}

- 32 -

^{embodied in the Stipulation, the Final Approval Order, and the Judgment and for matters
arising out of, concerning or relating thereto.}

^{7.18
Upon the payment of the Settlement Payment pursuant to ¶2.3(a) of this Stipulation, (a) this Stipulation shall not be executory, as that term has been interpreted under 11 U.S.C. §365, and (b) neither (i)
any other provision of this Stipulation, including, but not limited to, ¶¶2, 3, 5, 7.1, 7.3, and 7.11, nor (ii) any further effort or responsibility to defend against any appeal or proceeding seeking judicial review of any order
contemplated by this Stipulation (including, but not limited to, the Final Approval Order and any order approving the fees and expenses of Plaintiffs’ Counsel) shall render the Settlement or this Stipulation executory, as that term has been
interpreted under 11 U.S.C. §365.}

^{7.19 This Stipulation and the Exhibits hereto shall be considered to have been negotiated, executed and
delivered, and to be wholly performed, in the State of Tennessee, and the rights and obligations of the Settling Parties to the Stipulation shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the internal substantive laws of the
State of Tennessee without giving effect to Tennessee’s choice-of-law principles.}

^{IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Settling Parties have caused the Stipulation to be executed, by themselves and/or by their duly authorized attorneys, dated November 18, 2016.}


DATED: November 18, 2016				ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
				DARREN J. ROBBINS
				BENNY C. GOODMAN III
				ERIK W. LUEDEKE
				JUAN CARLOS SANCHEZ

				/s/ Benny C. Goodman III
				BENNY C. GOODMAN III

				655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
				San Diego, CA 92101
				Telephone: 619/231-1058
				619/231-7423 (fax)

- 33 -


				ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
				JOHN C. HERMAN
				Monarch Centre, Suite 1650
				3424 Peachtree Road, N.E.
				Atlanta, GA 30326
				Telephone: 404/504-6500
				404/504-6501 (fax)

				DAVIES, HUMPHREYS, HORTON & REESE
				WADE B. COWAN
				85 White Bridge Road, Suite 300
				Nashville, TN 37205
				Telephone: 615/256-8125
				615/242-7853 (fax)

				ROBBINS ARROYO LLP
				BRIAN J. ROBBINS
				KEVIN A. SEELY
				ASHLEY R. RIFKIN
				600 B Street, Suite 1900
				San Diego, CA 92101
				Telephone: 619/525-3990
				619/525-3991 (fax)

				SULLIVAN, WARD, ASHER & PATTON, P.C.
				MICHAEL J. ASHER
				25800 Northwestern Highway
				1000 Maccabees Center
				Southfield, MI 48075-1000
				Telephone: 248/746-0700
				248/746-2760 (fax)

				Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DATED: November 18, 2016				PROSKAUER LLP
				PETER DUFFY DOYLE

				/s/ Peter Doyle
				PETER DUFFY DOYLE

				Eleven Times Square
				New York, NY 10036-8299
				Telephone: 212/969-3000
				212/969-2900 (fax)

				Counsel for Defendants Wayne T. Smith, W. Larry Cash, John A. Clerico, John A. Fry, William Norris Jennings, Julia B. North, H. Mitchell Watson, Jr. and Counsel for T. Mark Buford and James S. Ely III

- 34 -


DATED: November 18, 2016				ROBBINS, RUSSELL, ENGLERT, ORSECK,
				UNTEREINER & SAUBER LLP
				GARY A. ORESCK
				MICHAEL L. WALDMAN
				ALISON C. BARNES
				MATTHEW M. MADDEN

				/s/ Matthew Madden
				MATTHEW M. MADDEN

				1801 K Street, N.W., Suite 411L
				Washington, DC 20006
				Telephone: 202/775-4500
				202/775-4510 (fax)

				RILEY, WARNOCK & JACOBSON, PLC
				STEVEN A. RILEY
				JOHN R. JACOBSON
				MILTON S. McGEE III
				1906 West End Avenue
				Nashville, TN 37203
				Telephone: 615/3203700
				615/320-3737 (fax)

				Counsel for Nominal Defendant Community Health Systems, Inc.

- 35 -