UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant   ☒                             Filed by a party other than the Registrant   ☐

Check the appropriate box:

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

FULFILLING OUR purposeCOMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMSNotice of 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy StatementTo be held: Tuesday, May 10, 2022 8:00 a.m. (Central Daylight Time)Hilton Franklin Cool Springs601 Corporate Centre DriveFranklin, TennesseeCHS Community Health Systems

		March 31, 2022

DEAR FELLOW STOCKHOLDERS,

We are pleased to announce the Community Health Systems, Inc. 2022 Annual Meeting. The attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement describe the business to be considered and voted on during that meeting. We encourage you to read the Proxy Statement carefully for more information.

It is important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan on attending the meeting, the Company would appreciate your efforts to vote your shares. Additional information on this process can be found in the Proxy Statement.

We do not believe that communication begins and ends with the Annual Meeting. We appreciate the dialogue we have with our stockholders and look forward to continuing this dialogue in the future. Thank you for your investment in Community Health Systems, Inc. and your support.

Sincerely,

Wayne T. Smith

Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors

Tim L. Hingtgen

Chief Executive Officer

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Tuesday, May 10, 2022

8:00 a.m. (Central Time)

Hilton Franklin Cool Springs, 601 Corporate Centre Drive, Franklin, TN 37067

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Community Health Systems, Inc. (the “Annual Meeting”) will be held on Tuesday, May 10, 2022 at 8:00 a.m. (Central Time) at the Hilton Franklin Cool Springs, 601 Corporate Centre Drive, Franklin, TN 37067.*

The Annual Meeting will be held for the purpose of considering and acting upon the following matters:

The close of business on March 14, 2022, has been fixed as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

YOU ARE REQUESTED, WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING, TO VOTE VIA THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE, OR COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING AND WISH TO VOTE YOUR SHARES PERSONALLY, YOU MAY DO SO AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE PROXY IS EXERCISED. IF YOU HOLD YOUR SHARES THROUGH A BANK, BROKER OR OTHER NOMINEE, YOU MAY VOTE YOUR SHARES BY THE METHODS SPECIFIED ON THE VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM THAT THEY PROVIDE. WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO VOTE YOUR SHARES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Christopher G. Cobb

Vice President-Legal and Corporate Secretary

Franklin, Tennessee

March 31, 2022

* As a result of continuing uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, if conditions leading up to the meeting warrant, we may decide to hold the Annual Meeting remotely (via a virtual meeting), or otherwise alter the logistics of the Annual Meeting, in light of public health considerations. We would plan to announce any such updates on our internet website in the Investor Relations – Annual Reports & Proxy Statements section (www.chs.net/investor-relations/annual-reports/) and would also plan to announce any change to a virtual meeting via a press release and the filing of additional soliciting material with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risk and uncertainties. All statements in this Proxy Statement other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding projections, expected operating results, and other events that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions or that include words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “thinks,” and similar expressions, are forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, these assumptions are inherently subject to significant economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and may be beyond the control of the Company. Accordingly, the Company cannot give any assurance that its expectations will in fact occur and cautions that actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. A number of factors could affect the future results of the Company or the healthcare industry generally and could cause the Company’s expected results to differ materially from those expressed in this Proxy Statement. These factors including, without limitation, the risks and uncertainties disclosed in our public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on February 17, 2022. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events, or otherwise.

SUMMARY

This summary highlights information about Community Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”, “we”, “our”, or “us”) and certain information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. Our stockholders will be asked to consider and vote on the matters listed below at our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire Proxy Statement before voting. In addition, for more complete information about the Company’s business and details about the Company’s 2021 performance highlights and the financial measures mentioned in this Proxy Statement, please review the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2022.

2021 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Overall, 2021 was a strong year for CHS, as the Company’s strategic investments and resilience helped to deliver improved performance, despite the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic continuing to present a challenging operating environment for providers of healthcare services.

In 2021, the Company continued to make additional investments across its strategic imperatives, which are strategies designed to improve patient safety and quality, enhance operational excellence, advance patient connectivity, and improve our competitive position across the communities we serve. These investments, coupled with the Company’s dual track strategy of prioritizing care for COVID-19 patients, have allowed us to operate effectively during this ever-changing environment.

For 2021, net operating revenues of $12.4 billion represented a 4.9% increase compared to the prior year. While the Company’s net revenue was improved versus 2020, patient volumes across the industry continue to remain below the demand that was experienced prior to the pandemic. During 2021, the pandemic continued to negatively impact our patient volumes including the volume of elective procedures. The pandemic and associated inflationary pressures also resulted in increases to our expenses for labor, personal protective equipment (PPE), pharmaceuticals, and other costs to treat COVID-19 patients. Notwithstanding these challenges, in addition to executing across our net revenue initiatives, the Company also benefitted from the continued advancement of its margin improvement program. As such, the Company delivered improvements across a number of key metrics, such as Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin, in comparison to 2020. We also achieved significant improvements across our capital structure as a result of a number of capital market transactions that extended debt maturities and lowered annual cash interest. Additionally, the Company continued to invest in existing markets, adding incremental bed capacity, service lines, and access points, while at the same time investing additional resources for our medical staff and employees. We also benefitted from government stimulus measures intended to support providers of healthcare services during the pandemic.

As we look back at 2021, our entire organization is incredibly proud of our accomplishments. During an environment that continued to be unpredictable, our leadership teams, providers, and employees have worked together to deliver high-quality and safe patient care for the communities we serve. This level of performance would not have been possible without strong commitment and teamwork. While the COVID-19 pandemic is continuing into 2022, we are confident that all of the Company’s significant progress in 2021 positions the organization for further success. As we move forward, we expect to deliver additional value for all of the Company’s stakeholders.

S-1

Our consolidated results during 2021 and 2020 are reflected in the chart below.

S-2

(1) Earnings (loss) per diluted share, as adjusted, reflects our reported earnings (loss) attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. stockholders per diluted share for the periods presented adjusted for certain items as reflected on Annex A. Adjusted EBITDA is EBITDA (which is a non-GAAP financial measure that consists of net (loss) income attributable to Community Health Systems, Inc. before interest, income taxes and depreciation and amortization) adjusted for certain items as reflected on Annex A. For a definition and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA and Earnings (loss) per Diluted Share excluding adjustments, to the most comparable GAAP measures, and why we believe these non-GAAP financial measures present useful information to investors, see Annex A.

S-3

BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOMINEES

Upon the recommendation of our Governance and Nominating Committee, our Board of Directors has nominated twelve (12) people for election at this Annual Meeting to hold office until the next annual meeting and the election of their successors. A more detailed biography of each director can be found on pages 23 to 29 of the Proxy Statement.

S-4

* Committee Chair

S-5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

We value our stockholders’ perspective on our business and each year we interact with stockholders through a variety of stockholder engagement activities. During 2021, these engagement activities largely remained in virtual format due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, our key stockholder engagement activities included in-person or virtual attendance at nine investor conferences, five large group investor and prospective investor meetings, and our virtual 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Our Investor Relations department is the contact point for stockholder interaction with the Company. Stockholders may also access investor information about the Company through our website (www.chs.net/investor-relations/). For questions concerning Investor Relations, you may call (615) 465-7000 or email us from the Contact Us section on our website (www.chs.net/contact-us/).

ALIGNING PAY AND PERFORMANCE

2021 Executive Compensation

At our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 98% of the votes cast by our stockholders, excluding broker non-votes, were voted in favor of the Company’s advisory Say-on-Pay proposal with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers as described in our 2021 Proxy Statement. As our Compensation Committee has continued to review our compensation practices, it is mindful of the level of support received from our stockholders with respect to this Say-on-Pay proposal.

S-6

As a leading operator of general acute care hospitals and outpatient facilities within the healthcare industry, one of the nation’s largest and most dynamic industries, the Company must ensure that it attracts and retains the leadership and managerial talent needed to sustain its position in this rapidly changing industry. To remain competitive in the Company’s financial, capital and business markets, the Company views improving earnings and profitability as well as achieving growth as paramount objectives of the Company’s strategy. We believe these strategic objectives are fundamental points of alignment between stockholder value and the compensation of executive management.

We achieved or exceeded our primary financial targets in 2021 and made progress on other key objectives intended to position the Company for future growth, while also continuing to assist our affiliated hospitals and outpatient facilities in managing challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Consistent with the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy, taking these factors into account, our Chief Executive Officer received 130% of his target short-term cash incentive award for 2021 (in comparison, our then-serving Chief Executive Officer received 128% of his target short-term cash incentive award during 2020). Our long-term incentive (“LTI”) mix further aligns our executive compensation program with stockholder interests by virtue of the fact that 75% of the target LTI awards (based on the number of shares subject to such awards) granted to each of our named executive officers during 2021 was in the form of performance-based restricted stock or non-qualified stock options, which will result in value to the named executive officers only to the extent the Company achieves its long-term performance goals and/or our stock price increases in the future. Moreover, despite the improvement in our stock price between the LTI grant date in March 2020 and the LTI grant date in March 2021, the grant date fair value of the target LTI award to Mr. Hingtgen in 2021 was below the 25^th percentile of our peer group in 2021.

In addition, with respect to the performance-based restricted stock awards granted to our named executive officers in March 2019, which vested based on the Company’s three-year cumulative financial results during the 2019–2021 performance period, the Company’s performance exceeded 120% of the target for both of the three-year performance objectives (set in February 2019) underlying these awards, and the Company’s three-year TSR Percentile Rank was above the 75th percentile (which was an additional performance objective for the then-serving Chief Executive Officer and the then-serving Chief Financial Officer only). As a result, these performance-based restricted stock awards were earned at 200% of the target number of shares originally granted to each award recipient.

We conduct year-round proactive stockholder interaction and are committed to a continuing dialogue between stockholders and the Company to fully understand and consider stockholder perspectives on executive compensation and other topics that are important to our stockholders. In addition to our SEC filings, press releases, 2020/2021 Community Impact Report, 2021 Environmental Sustainability Report, and company website, we also communicate with stakeholders through earnings calls and investor conferences. In addition, during 2021, we met or consulted with stockholders that held over 50% of our shares outstanding at that time to discuss topics that are important to our stockholders, including soliciting feedback on corporate governance matters and our executive compensation program. Our Compensation Committee considers the feedback and suggestions we receive in light of both market best practices and what we believe to be necessary to execute a best-in-class compensation program that successfully addresses our senior executive talent attraction and retention needs.

Going forward, we will continue to evaluate our executive compensation program in light of stockholder feedback, governance best practices, regulatory requirements, economic and industry factors, current trends in public company pay practices, and competitive considerations. We intend to continue to make changes, as applicable, that both ensure the alignment between the interests of our stockholders and our executives and reflect industry-leading executive compensation programs.

S-7

KEY FEATURES OF OUR COMPENSATION SYSTEM

S-8

2021 COMPENSATION PROGRAM

The Company’s executive compensation philosophy is to develop and utilize a combination of compensation elements that reward current period performance, continued service, and attainment of future goals, and is designed to encourage the retention of executive talent. The key elements of executive compensation are linked either directly or indirectly to enhancing stockholder value. Attainment of annual incentive compensation requires achievement of targets with challenging thresholds and incentive compensation for above-target performance is capped. The Company continues to develop its compensation policies, programs, and disclosures to provide transparency and accountability to all of its stakeholders.

S-9

S-10

ROADMAP OF VOTING ITEMS

S-11

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

OF

COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

4000 Meridian Boulevard

Franklin, Tennessee 37067

PROXY STATEMENT

March 31, 2022

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDERS’ MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 10, 2022: THIS PROXY STATEMENT, THE FORM OF PROXY CARD AND THE 2021 ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS ARE AVAILABLE AT WWW.CHS.NET. ADDITIONALLY, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (“SEC”) RULES, YOU MAY ACCESS OUR PROXY MATERIALS AT WWW.PROXYVOTE.COM.

INTRODUCTION

Solicitation

This Proxy Statement and the form of proxy card of Community Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) are being mailed or made available to stockholders beginning on or about March 31, 2022. The Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board” or the “Board of Directors”) is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the Company’s 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Meeting”). The Board is soliciting your proxy to give all stockholders the opportunity to vote on matters that will be presented at the Meeting. This Proxy Statement provides you with information on these matters to assist you in voting your shares.

For simplicity of presentation throughout this Proxy Statement, we refer to employees of our indirect subsidiaries as “employees of the Company,” “our employees” or similar language. Notwithstanding this presentation style, the Company itself does not have any employees. Similarly, the healthcare operations and businesses described in this Proxy Statement are owned and operated and management services provided by distinct and indirect subsidiaries of the Company.

When and where will the Meeting be held?

We currently intend to hold the Meeting in person on Tuesday, May 10, 2022 at 8:00 a.m. (Central Daylight Time) at the Hilton Franklin Cool Springs, 601 Corporate Centre Drive, Franklin, Tennessee 37067. However, we are sensitive to the continuing uncertainty surrounding the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, if conditions leading up to the meeting warrant, we may decide to hold the Meeting remotely (via a virtual meeting), or (if the Meeting is not held remotely) hold the Meeting in a different location, impose additional procedures or limitations on Meeting attendees or otherwise alter the logistics of the Meeting, in light of public health considerations. We would plan to announce any such updates on our internet website in the Investor Relations – Annual Reports & Proxy Statements section (www.chs.net/investor-relations/annual-reports/) and would also plan to announce any changes to a virtual meeting via a press release and the filing of additional soliciting material with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Please check the website prior to the Meeting date if you are planning to attend. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Meeting.

Why did I receive a one-page notice in the mail regarding the internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

Pursuant to SEC rules and in order to help reduce the environmental impact and cost to the Company associated with the printing and mailing of proxy materials, the Company has elected to

1

provide access to our proxy materials via the internet. Accordingly, we are sending to many of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (a “Notice”) instead of sending a paper copy of the proxy materials. All stockholders receiving a Notice will have the ability to access the proxy materials on a website referenced in the Notice or to request a printed set of proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials via the internet or to request printed copies may be found in the Notice and in this Proxy Statement.

What is a proxy?

A proxy is your legal designation of another person (the “proxy”) to vote on your behalf. By completing and returning the enclosed proxy card (if applicable) or by indicating your vote via one of the other voting methods described below under “How do I vote my shares?”, you are giving the Chief Executive Officer or the Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of the Company the authority to vote your shares in the manner you indicate.

Why did I receive more than one proxy card or Notice?

You may receive multiple proxy cards if you hold your shares in different ways (e.g., joint tenancy, trusts, and custodial accounts) or in multiple accounts. You should indicate your vote on and sign each proxy card you receive. If your shares are held by one or more brokers, banks, trustees or other nominees (i.e., in “street name” as explained further below), you will receive separate voting instructions from each broker, bank, trustee or other nominee holding shares on your behalf regarding how you may vote such shares. You should follow the voting instructions received from each broker, bank, trustee or other nominee to separately indicate your vote for the shares held in each such account.

How can I elect to receive proxy materials electronically in future years?

We encourage stockholders to take advantage of the availability of the proxy materials on the internet to help reduce the environmental impact of our annual meetings as well as reduce the cost to the Company associated with the printing and mailing of proxy materials. If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials and wish to receive the proxy materials only electronically in the future, the proxy card (or voting instructions) provided with the proxy materials contains instructions on how you may elect to access proxy materials electronically in the future. If you received more than one paper copy of the proxy materials, please follow these instructions on each proxy card (or voting instructions) you received.

Voting Information

Who is qualified to vote?

You are qualified to receive notice of and to vote on the matters described in this Proxy Statement if you owned shares of common stock of the Company (“Common Stock”) at the close of business on our record date of Monday, March 14, 2022.

How many shares of Common Stock may vote at the Meeting?

As of March 14, 2022, there were 134,673,587 shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote on each matter presented.

What is the difference between a “stockholder of record” and a “street name” holder?

These terms describe how your shares are held. If your shares are registered directly in your name with American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, the Company’s transfer agent, you are a “stockholder of record.” If your shares are held in the name of a brokerage, bank, trust or other nominee as a custodian, you are a “street name” holder.

2

How do I vote my shares?

If you are a “stockholder of record” who received printed copies of the proxy materials, you can vote your proxy by mailing in the enclosed proxy card or you can vote prior to the Meeting by using one of the alternatives below:

To vote by telephone: 1-800-690-6903

To vote by internet: www.proxyvote.com

Please refer to the specific instructions set forth on the enclosed proxy card. In addition, please have the 16 digit control number, located on the proxy card, available when voting your shares. If you choose to vote your shares by telephone or through the internet, as noted above, it is not necessary for you to mail back your proxy card.

If you received one or more Notices instead of printed copies of the proxy materials, you should follow the voting instructions set forth in each Notice.

If you hold your shares in “street name,” your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee will provide you with materials and instructions for voting your shares, which may allow you to vote prior to the Meeting by using the internet or a toll free telephone number to vote your shares. If you hold shares through more than one broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, you will receive separate materials and voting instructions from each. You will need to separately follow the instructions received from each broker, bank, trustee or other nominee through which you hold shares in order to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

In addition to the voting methods set forth above, “stockholders of record” and holders of shares in “street name” may vote at the Meeting as set forth below under “Can I vote my shares at the Meeting?”

Can I vote my shares at the Meeting?

If you are a “stockholder of record,” you may vote your shares in person at the Meeting. If you hold your shares in “street name,” you must obtain a proxy from your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Meeting. In order to be admitted to the Meeting, you must present a valid government-issued photo identification and proof of ownership of the Company’s stock as of the record date. This can be a brokerage statement or letter from a bank indicating ownership as of the record date, a proxy card or a legal proxy provided by your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee. If you hold your shares in “street name,” please consult with your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, as necessary, in advance of the Meeting date to ensure that you have what you need to access the Meeting.

What are the Board’s recommendations on how I should vote my shares?

The Board recommends that you vote your shares as follows:

3

How would my shares be voted if I do not specify how they should be voted?

If you are a stockholder of record and you sign and return your proxy card without indicating how you want your shares to be voted, your shares will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations for the proposals listed above and in the discretion of the named proxies regarding any other matters properly presented for a vote at the Meeting.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and do not provide each broker, bank, trustee or other nominee that holds your shares with specific voting instructions, under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), the broker, bank, trustee or other nominee that holds your shares may generally vote on “routine” matters without instructions from you. We expect the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022 (Proposal 3) to be the only proposal that is considered a “routine” matter. Accordingly, if your shares are held through a broker, bank, trust or other nominee, that person will have discretion to vote your shares on only that matter if you fail to provide instructions.

On the other hand, under NYSE rules, your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee is not entitled to vote your shares on any “non-routine” matters if it does not receive instructions from you on how to vote. The election of directors (Proposal 1), and the approval, on an advisory basis, of named executive officer (“NEO”) compensation (Proposal 2) will be considered “non-routine” matters. Thus, if you do not give your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee specific instructions on how to vote your shares with respect to those proposals, your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee will inform the Inspectors of Election that it does not have the authority to vote on those matters with respect to your shares. This is generally referred to as a “broker non-vote.” A broker non-vote may also occur if your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee fails to vote your shares for any reason. Therefore, if you hold your shares through a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, please instruct that person regarding how to vote your shares on at least Proposals 1 and 2.

How many votes must be present to hold the Meeting?

The presence, in person or represented by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding on the record date for the Meeting will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Meeting.

How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?

Abstentions are deemed to be “present” at the Meeting, are counted for quorum purposes and, other than for the election of directors (Proposal 1), will have the same effect as a vote against the matter. In the case of Proposal 1, an abstention will not be deemed to be a vote cast either for or against any nominee. Broker non-votes, if any, while counted for general quorum purposes, will have no effect on the voting results for any non-routine matter in respect of which there may be broker non-votes.

Can I change my vote?

If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy by doing one of the following:

4

If you hold your shares in “street name,” your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee will provide you with instructions on how to revoke your proxy.

What vote is required to approve each proposal?

With respect to Proposal 1, you may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN with respect to each nominee. If you ABSTAIN from voting on Proposal 1 with respect to any nominee, the abstention will not have any effect on the outcome of the vote with respect to such nominee.

With respect to Proposals 2 and 3, you may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN. If you ABSTAIN from voting on either of Proposals 2 or 3, the abstention will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal.

Who will count the votes?

Representatives from Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will count the votes and serve as our Inspectors of Election. The Inspectors of Election will be present at the Meeting.

Who pays the cost of proxy solicitation?

The Company pays the costs of soliciting proxies. The Company has engaged Georgeson Inc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of approximately $18,000, plus reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Upon request, the Company will reimburse brokers, banks, trustees or their other nominees for reasonable expenses incurred by them in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners of shares of the Company’s Common Stock. In addition, certain of our directors and officers, as well as employees of our management company, may aid in the solicitation of proxies. These individuals will receive no compensation in addition to their regular compensation.

Is this Proxy Statement the only way that proxies are being solicited?

No. As stated above, in addition to mailing or providing notice of the availability of these proxy materials, our proxy solicitor, Georgeson Inc., and certain of our directors and officers, as well as employees, may solicit proxies by telephone, e-mail or personal contact. These directors, officers and employees will not be specifically compensated for doing so.

If you have any further questions about voting your shares or attending the Meeting, please call our Corporate Secretary at (615) 465-7000.

5

GENERAL INFORMATION

How may I contact the Lead Director of the Board of Directors or other non-management members of the Board of Directors?

The Lead Director of the Company’s Board of Directors is John C. Clerico, who presides at regularly scheduled executive sessions of our Board. He and any of the other non-management directors (including the chair of any of the standing committees of our Board) may be contacted by any stockholder or other interested party in the following manner:

c/o Community Health Systems

4000 Meridian Boulevard

Franklin, TN 37067

Attention: Corporate Secretary

(615) 465-7000

Investor_Communications@chs.net

In the alternative, stockholders or other interested parties may communicate with our directors or our corporate compliance officer by accessing the Confidential Disclosure Program established under our Code of Conduct:

Corporate Compliance and Privacy Officer

Community Health Systems

4000 Meridian Boulevard

Franklin, TN 37067

(800) 495-9510

https://www.mycompliancereport.com/ (use code “CYH”)

Generally, all materials that are appropriate director communications will be forwarded to the intended recipient; however, management may simultaneously conduct an investigation of any operational, compliance, or legal matter in accordance with its established policies and procedures. Management reserves the right to reject from this process any material that is harassing, unduly offensive or otherwise not credible, or that solicits business on behalf of the sender.

How is the Board of Directors organized and how is the independence of the Board of Directors determined?

The role of our Board is governed by the Company’s Amended and Restated By-laws (the “By-laws”), and is further described in our Governance Guidelines (the “Governance Guidelines”). Currently, our Board has eleven (11) members following the death of director Julia B. North in December 2021. In addition to the incumbent directors, upon the recommendation of our Governance and Nominating Committee, our Board of Directors has nominated Susan W. Brooks to stand for election at this Annual Meeting as noted herein.

A majority of our directors must be “independent” under NYSE rules. In addition, our Governance Guidelines include independence standards established by our Board to assist it in determining independence in accordance with such rules for those directors who are not also members of management. To determine whether our incumbent directors and any new director nominees are independent, the Board evaluates any relationships of our directors and director nominees with the Company and the members of the Company’s management, against the independence standards set forth in our Governance Guidelines and the applicable rules of the NYSE and SEC. In making its independence determinations, the Board broadly considers all relevant facts and circumstances, including the responses of our directors and director nominees to a questionnaire completed by each

6

of them on an annual basis, which solicits information about their relationships and other facts and circumstances that may be relevant to such independence determination. The Board also considers any relationships between the Company and other organizations on which our directors or director nominees serve as directors or with respect to which such directors or director nominees are otherwise affiliated. The Board determined that each of our existing non-management directors and the new director nominee satisfied all of the independence standards set forth in the Governance Guidelines and the applicable rules of the NYSE and SEC (including the specific standards applicable to members of our Audit and Compliance Committee and Compensation Committee) and did not otherwise have a material relationship with the Company (either directly or as an officer, employee, shareholder or partner of an organization that has a relationship with the Company). After such evaluations, our Board has affirmatively determined that each of the following non-management directors and the new director nominee are independent under the Governance Guidelines and the applicable rules of the NYSE and the SEC:

John A. Clerico

Michael Dinkins

James S. Ely III

John A. Fry

Joseph A. Hastings, D.M.D.

Elizabeth T. Hirsch

William Norris Jennings, M.D.

K. Ranga Krishnan, MBBS

H. James Williams, Ph.D.

Susan W. Brooks (nominee)

Mr. Smith and Mr. Hingtgen, who are also officers of the Company and employed by a subsidiary of the Company, are not independent.

Do the independent members of the Board of Directors meet in separate sessions?

The independent members of our Board meet frequently in executive sessions, typically at the end of each regularly scheduled Board meeting, and otherwise as needed. The Lead Director presides over those sessions and is in a position to take a leadership role in certain limited circumstances when leadership by the Executive Chairman is not deemed advisable. The Lead Director also provides significant input into Board meeting agendas and presentation topics. During 2021, the independent members of our Board met in executive session eleven (11) times, either in conjunction with a Board meeting or a committee meeting at which the other independent members were present.

What is the leadership structure of the Board of Directors?

The Board is currently led by Wayne T. Smith as Executive Chairman. The Board has carefully considered its leadership structure and believes at this time that the Company and its stockholders are best served by having the positions of Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer filled by different individuals. This allows the Chief Executive Officer to focus on the Company’s day-to-day operations, while allowing the Executive Chairman to lead the Board in providing advice and oversight to management. Further, the Board believes that having the Executive Chairman serve dual roles as Chairman of the Board of Directors and as an executive officer of the Company promotes information flow between management and the Board, effective decision making and an alignment of corporate strategy as well as enabling the Executive Chairman to assist in certain strategic and other executive management responsibilities. The Board believes that Mr. Smith’s broad and lengthy leadership experience in the healthcare industry, including 24 years of prior service as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company through the end of 2020, uniquely qualify him for the role of Executive Chairman. In addition, the Board believes that certain other practices and policies (including

7

the role of our independent Lead Director) assure that the independent members of the Board (who comprise a super-majority of the Board) provide appropriate oversight, consultation, and involvement. The Governance and Nominating Committee regularly reviews the Board’s leadership structure to assess whether to separate or combine the roles of Executive Chairman (or Chairman, as applicable) and Chief Executive Officer based on the Company’s particular facts and circumstances at the time, and the Board retains flexibility to determine the appropriate leadership structure for the Company based on such facts and circumstances.

The Board is responsible for broad corporate policy and overseeing the overall performance of the Company. Members of the Board are kept informed of the Company’s business by various documents sent to them before each meeting and oral reports made to them during these meetings by the Company’s Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and other corporate executives. All directors are advised of actions taken by the various committees of the Board and are invited to, and frequently do, attend meetings of Board committees on which they do not serve. Directors have access to the Company’s books, records and reports, and members of management are available at all times to answer their questions.

The Governance and Nominating Committee, which consists entirely of independent directors, periodically examines the Board leadership structure, as well as other governance practices, and also conducts an annual assessment of the Board’s and each committee’s effectiveness. The Governance and Nominating Committee has determined that the present leadership structure is effective and appropriate.

As indicated above, the independent members of the Board meet in executive sessions that are presided over by the independent Lead Director, currently John C. Clerico. As previously announced in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 18, 2022, Mr. Clerico succeeded Julia B. North, who passed away in December 2021, in this role. Mr. Clerico has been a member of our Board since 2003 with former service as chair of both our Audit and Compliance Committee and our Compensation Committee. The Lead Director serves as the principal liaison between the independent directors and the Chair and other members of management. The Lead Director also has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors and prepare agendas for such meetings. The Lead Director also takes an active role in approving and setting agendas and presentation topics, and approving the materials to be sent to the Board prior to its meetings. Upon request, the Lead Director is also available for consultation and direct communication with major stockholders.

Board independence is further achieved through the completely independent composition of the three standing committees of the Board: Audit and Compliance, Compensation, and Governance and Nominating, each of which is supported by an appropriate charter and holds executive sessions without management present. Each of the Board’s independent directors serves on one or more of these committees and, as noted above, is invited to, and frequently does, attend meetings and executive sessions of Board committees on which he or she does not serve. Thus, there is ample opportunity to meet and confer without any member of management present.

The Board has concluded that the structure and practices of the independent members of the Board assure effective independent oversight, as well as effective independent leadership while maintaining practical efficiency.

8

What are the Company’s environmental, social and governance initiatives and where can I find additional information regarding these initiatives?

In addition to our good corporate governance practices highlighted above in the Corporate Governance Highlights section, we have implemented, various environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) initiatives, including in the following areas:

Environment/Sustainability. We are committed to providing high-quality care in the communities we serve while identifying and implementing processes that improve energy efficiency, reduce consumption and waste, minimize environmental impact and improve community well-being. We have established goals which focus on the reduction of our carbon footprint, water and energy usage and material waste. Achieving these goals can often be cost-effective as well as important for environmental sustainability. Our key environmental goals include the following:

9

Responding to COVID-19. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, our hospitals, medical clinics, medical personnel, and employees have been actively caring for COVID-19 patients. The safety of our patients, physicians, nurses, and employees in the communities in which we serve has remained our primary focus during the pandemic. At the beginning of the pandemic, we established a COVID-19 Crisis Command Center and Response Team to ensure support for our workforce and the coordination of our resources and leadership in connection with responding to the pandemic. As part of our approach, we implemented a dual-track operating model which supported a high level of care for COVID-positive patients while also ensuring the delivery of other critical health services.

We have also implemented considerable safety measures in connection with the pandemic, including through purchasing personal protective equipment for front-line caregivers and other personnel working in our healthcare facilities. In addition, we have transferred supplies and other resources among our facilities to ensure that the necessary resources are available at facilities with the greatest need as conditions have evolved with respect to the pandemic.

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. We are committed to diversity, equity and inclusion, including recruiting and retaining a diverse population of employees with respect to their experiences, education, socioeconomic status, race, color, ethnicity, religion, national origin, disability, culture, sexual orientation and gender identity or expression that are reflective of the communities we serve. To further this priority, during 2021, we hired a new vice president and a new senior director of diversity, equity and inclusion, and also established a diversity leadership committee. Our diversity, equity and inclusion plan objectives are to strengthen cultural competence, build a diverse talent pipeline, retain and develop high potential employees, improve patient experience and outcomes, and increase supplier diversity. In 2021, as part of our annual Employee Engagement Surveys, we polled our employees on their individual perceptions of diversity, equity and inclusion across our facilities and are actively using the survey results to inform the actions of our diversity leadership committee, specifically in the areas of education and training. By fostering a culture of inclusion, we believe that we are able to retain the best and brightest talent by making all employees feel valued by members of their respective team. As of December 31, 2021, approximately 80% of our employees were women and approximately 25% were people of color.

Sustaining Our People. Our employees are vital contributors to the success of our organization, and we devote significant resources to recruit, retain and develop our workforce. Our healthcare personnel have provided quality and compassionate care to patients suffering from COVID-19 and other medical conditions, and we have offered mental health support for our personnel struggling with the emotional impact of caring for patients during the pandemic. We also provide a wide range of development programs and resources, including the following:

10

Patient Safety and High Quality of Care. We maintain an emphasis on patient safety and clinical outcomes and we are continuously focused on ways to improve patient, physician and employee satisfaction. To improve outcomes, healthcare personnel at our facilities use evidence-based medicine and clinical care paths in the treatment of our patients. We believe that a focus on continuous improvement yields the best results for patients, reduces risk and liability, and creates value for the people and communities we serve. As the result of our patient safety efforts, our Serious Safety Event Rate has declined significantly since 2013.

We also have expanded our network of outpatient services to create greater access and more convenience for our patients. Moreover, as conditions arising from the pandemic accelerated the need for telehealth appointments, particularly earlier in the pandemic, we have significantly expanded our ability to provide remote care.

For additional information regarding our focus on patient safety and quality of care, see the discussion under “Our Business Strategy — Continuously improve patient safety and quality of care” in Part I, Item 1 (Business) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on February 17, 2022.

Community Involvement. The Company is committed to supporting the communities in which we operate. For example, our hospitals improve the wellbeing of local residents through health fairs, screenings and educational programs, and actively participate in civic and charitable causes, sponsor community events and support local programs through volunteerism. Moreover, we and our employees support our communities and employees through organizations such as the CHS Foundation, a foundation funded by charitable gifts from the Company and its employees which supports organizations involved with education, health, human services and international development, and the CHS Cares Fund, a non-profit charitable fund (administered by The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee) whose purpose is to provide financial assistance to employees of the Company’s affiliated entities, clinics and offices who have experienced hardship due to events beyond their control such as natural disasters and extended illnesses or injuries. In this regard, numerous grants have been made by the CHS Cares Fund to employees of the Company who have suffered financial hardship as the result of the pandemic.

In addition, we have developed strategies with our affiliated hospitals to manage controlled substances, especially opioids. Opioid management teams at our hospitals elevate awareness, define direction, and drive efforts related to pain assessment and management.

We have reported on our ESG initiatives since 2010. Our most recent reports are our 2020/2021 Community Impact Report and 2021 Environmental Sustainability Report, both of which are available on our internet website in the Company Overview — Community Impact Report section (www.chs.net/company-overview/community-impact-report/). Please note that our website is provided as an inactive textual reference and the information on our website (whether referenced here or elsewhere in this Proxy Statement) is not incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement.

How does the Board of Directors oversee risk?

Risk management is primarily the responsibility of the Company’s management team, which is administered through a broad-based committee that includes executives from our operations, internal

11

audit, clinical services, compliance, quality, revenue management, accounting, risk management, finance, facilities management, human resources, information technology, and legal departments. The Board is responsible for the overall supervision of the Company’s risk management activities. The risks overseen by the Board include, without limitation, business, industry, economic, patient safety, and ESG risks. ESG matters overseen by the Board include environmental, sustainability, corporate social responsibility, energy and natural resource conservation, and human capital management strategies and programs, including with respect to diversity, equity and inclusion, and leadership and talent development. For additional information regarding the Company’s ESG initiatives, see “What are the Company’s environmental, social and governance initiatives and where can I find additional information regarding these initiatives?” The Board’s oversight of the material risks faced by the Company occurs at both the full board level and at the committee level.

The Audit and Compliance Committee has oversight responsibility, not only for financial reporting with respect to the Company’s major financial exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, but also for the effectiveness of management’s enterprise risk management process that monitors key business risks facing the Company. In addition, as discussed in greater detail below, the Audit and Compliance Committee has primary oversight responsibility regarding the Company’s information security programs, including cybersecurity and procedures, data privacy and data protection risks. See “What is the Board’s role in overseeing information security?” The Audit and Compliance Committee also oversees the delegation of responsibility for the oversight of specific risk areas among the other Board committees, consistent with the committees’ charters and responsibilities.

The Compensation Committee oversees risks associated with the Company’s executive compensation programs, including confirming that such programs do not encourage conduct that would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Taking into account the Compensation Committee’s oversight of such risks, the Company has determined that any risks arising from its compensation programs and policies are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. For additional information regarding the Company’s risk assessment of its compensation programs and practices, and relevant considerations in connection therewith, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Risk Assessment of Executive Compensation.”

Management provides regular updates throughout the year to the respective Board committees regarding the management of the risks each committee oversees, and each of these committees discusses those risks with the full Board at either regular meetings of the Board or at committee meetings in which all Board members participate. At least once every year, the Audit and Compliance Committee reviews the allocation of risk responsibility among the Board’s committees and implements any changes it deems appropriate. The Audit and Compliance Committee, together with the full Board of Directors, is actively involved in the oversight of risk issue identification and assessment at the Company and mitigation strategies employed by the Company with respect to each of these risks.

In addition to the reports from the committees, the Board receives presentations throughout the year from various department and business unit leaders that include discussions of possible risks. At each Board meeting, the Executive Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer address, in a director-only session, matters of particular importance or concern, including any areas of risk that require attention from the Board. Additionally, through dedicated sessions focusing entirely on corporate strategy, the full Board reviews in detail the Company’s short and long-term strategies, including consideration of risks facing the Company and their potential impact.

We believe that our approach to risk oversight, as described above, optimizes our ability to assess inter-relationships among the various risks, make informed cost-benefit decisions, and approach emerging risks in a proactive manner for the Company. We also believe that our risk structure complements our current Board leadership structure, as it allows our independent directors, through the three fully independent Board committees, as well as the Lead Director, to exercise effective oversight

12

of the actions of management, led by Mr. Smith as Executive Chairman and Mr. Hingtgen as Chief Executive Officer, in identifying risks and implementing effective risk management policies and controls.

What is the Board’s role in overseeing information security?

The Company places the utmost importance on information security and privacy, including protecting the personal medical, financial and insurance information of its patients and employees. The Audit and Compliance Committee has primary oversight responsibility regarding the Company’s information security programs, including cybersecurity and procedures, data privacy and network security. The Audit and Compliance Committee and the full Board receive updates at least quarterly from management covering the Company’s programs for managing information security risks, including data privacy and data protection risks. The Company has adopted the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework to assess the maturity of its cybersecurity programs. Other aspects of the Company’s comprehensive information security program include:

The Company’s management regularly monitors best practices in this area and seeks to implement changes to the Company’s security programs as needed to ensure the Company maintains a robust data security and privacy program. The Company also maintains an information security insurance policy that provides coverage for data security breaches.

What are the standing committees of the Board of Directors?

Our Board has three standing committees: Audit and Compliance, Compensation, and Governance and Nominating. Each standing committee operates pursuant to a committee charter. Each of these committees is comprised solely of independent directors, and each independent director meets the additional criteria for committee membership, as set forth in the Company’s Governance Guidelines and the applicable committee charter. The current composition of our Board’s standing committees is as follows:

It is currently anticipated that Ms. Brooks, our director nominee, will not be appointed to a Committee at the time of her election to the Board of Directors.

13

How many times did the Board of Directors and its committees meet in 2021? What was the attendance by the members? What are the duties of the Board’s committees?

Directors are encouraged to attend our annual meeting of stockholders; all of our then-serving directors were present at our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which was held virtually due to the uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. The annual meeting of the Board in 2021 was held immediately after the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

In 2021, the Board held five (5) meetings (all of which were regular meetings). Each director attended at least 75% of the Board meetings and meetings of the committees of the Board on which he or she served during the period.

The Audit and Compliance Committee held eight (8) meetings during 2021. The other independent members of the Board were invited to and generally attended the meetings of the Audit and Compliance Committee. As set forth in its charter, the Audit and Compliance Committee’s responsibility is to provide advice and counsel to management regarding, and to assist the Board in its oversight of: (i) the integrity of the Company’s consolidated financial statements; (ii) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (iii) the requirements of the Corporate Integrity Agreement, Amended, dated September 21, 2018, between the Company and the Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, and any amendments thereto; (iv) the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence; (v) the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and its independent registered public accounting firm; and (vi) the Company’s policy on the use of derivative products. As discussed above under “How does the Board of Directors Oversee Risks?” and “What is the Board’s role in overseeing information security?”, the Audit and Compliance Committee also has oversight responsibilities with respect to enterprise risk management and the Company’s information security programs. The Audit and Compliance Committee report is incorporated herein by reference to Part III of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 17, 2022 under “Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.”

The Compensation Committee held four (4) meetings during 2021. The primary purpose of the Compensation Committee is to: (i) assist the Board in discharging its responsibilities relating to compensation of the Company’s executives; (ii) administer the Company’s cash-based incentive compensation plans with regard to executive officers of the Company; (iii) approve awards and grants and administer outstanding awards and grants of equity-based compensation arrangements to directors, employees, and others pursuant to the Company’s equity compensation plans; and (iv) produce an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statement in accordance with applicable rules and regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Compensation Committee’s report is set forth later in this Proxy Statement.

As set forth in its charter, the primary responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are to oversee the elements of the compensation arrangements available to the Company and its subsidiaries that are used to compensate the Company’s executive officers, and in particular, the Executive Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee also approves the goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Executive Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and the other executive officers and determines whether targets have been attained in connection with target-based compensation awards and equity grants.

Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee has authority to engage its own executive compensation consultants and legal advisors. Since 2005, Mercer Human Resources Consulting (“Mercer”), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (“MMC”), has served as the independent executive compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee. A

14

representative of Mercer attends meetings of the Compensation Committee and communicates with the Compensation Committee chair between meetings on matters related to executive compensation. Mercer’s fees for serving as the Compensation Committee’s independent executive compensation consultant in 2021 were approximately $252,000. During 2021, the Company, at the direction of management, also retained MMC or its affiliates to provide limited consulting services to management, which services were limited primarily to conducting actuarial analyses of the Company’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans. In 2021, the total amount paid to MMC or its affiliates for such services was approximately $80,000. Although the Compensation Committee is aware that the Company uses MMC or its affiliates for such services, it does not specifically approve those services. The Compensation Committee has assessed Mercer’s independence pursuant to the independence factors set forth for compensation consultants in the NYSE listing standards and in the Compensation Committee’s charter and has determined that no conflicts of interest exist.

The Governance and Nominating Committee met two (2) times during 2021. The primary responsibilities of the Governance and Nominating Committee are to: (i) identify individuals qualified to become Board members and to select, or recommend that the Board select, the director nominees for the next annual meeting of stockholders, and make recommendations for directors’ assignments to the Committees of the Board; (ii) develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance guidelines applicable to the Company and regularly review such corporate governance guidelines and recommend to the Board any changes thereto; (iii) review and make recommendations to the Board regarding compensation programs for non-employee directors; and (iv) review and approve the Company’s policies on and responses to important stockholder issues and proposals, including recommending to the Board the placement of stockholder proposals, and the Board’s response thereto, in the Proxy Statement.

Who are the Company’s audit committee financial experts?

Our Board has determined that all four of the members of our Audit and Compliance Committee are “audit committee financial experts” as defined by the Exchange Act — Michael Dinkins, James S. Ely III, Elizabeth T. Hirsch, and H. James Williams, Ph.D.

Does the Company have limitations regarding service on other boards by the Company’s directors?

Yes, in order to ensure that our directors have sufficient time to devote to Company matters, under the Company’s Governance Guidelines, no non-management director of the Company may serve on more than four public companies’ boards of directors, including our Board. In addition, no member of the Company’s Audit and Compliance Committee may serve on more than two other public companies’ audit committees. No director who is an executive officer of the Company may serve on more than two public companies’ boards of directors, including our Board. The Executive Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer are required to obtain the approval of the Governance and Nominating Committee prior to accepting any nomination or appointment to serve on the board of directors of another public company. In addition, a director of the Company is required to notify the chair of the Company’s Governance and Nominating Committee and the Corporate Secretary in a timely fashion of his or her appointment to or resignation from the board of directors of another public company. Any member of the Audit and Compliance Committee is also required to notify the chair of the Company’s Governance and Nominating Committee and the Corporate Secretary of his or her appointment to or resignation from another company’s audit committee.

Does the Company have a code of conduct?

The Company has a robust compliance program, the cornerstone of which is our Code of Conduct. Our Code of Conduct has been adopted and implemented throughout our organization and is

15

applicable to all members of the Board and our officers, as well as employees of our subsidiaries. A variation of this Code of Conduct has been in effect at our Company since 1997.

Where can I obtain a copy of the Company’s Board of Directors’ governance documents?

Copies of the current version of our Governance Guidelines, including our independence standards, along with current versions of our By-laws, Code of Conduct and Board committee charters are posted on our internet website in the Company Overview — Corporate Governance section (www.chs.net/company-overview/corporate-governance/). These items are also available in print to any stockholder who requests them by writing to Community Health Systems, Attn: Investor Relations, 4000 Meridian Boulevard, Franklin, TN 37067.

How are the Company’s Directors compensated?

Our Board has approved a compensation program for non-management directors, which consists of both cash and equity-based compensation. Non-management director compensation is typically reviewed annually by the Governance and Nominating Committee, in consultation with the Compensation Committee’s independent executive compensation consultant, Mercer Human Resources Consulting, and adjusted if needed, on the same cycle as is our executive compensation. In addition, to further align directors’ interests with the long-term interests of stockholders, the Company requires that at least 50% of the non-management directors’ annual compensation be paid in the form of equity in the Company.

For 2021, consistent with past practice, the non-management directors’ compensation package was reviewed by the Governance and Nominating Committee, in consultation with Mercer. For 2021, Mercer advised that, based on a review of the board compensation paid by our peer group as set forth below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Components of the Executive Compensation Program — Peer Group Companies (for 2021 Compensation Cycle),” the annual total compensation package of $290,000 (exclusive of the annual stipends paid to the Lead Director and the chairs of the Board’s three standing committees as referenced below) paid to our non-management directors in 2021 continued to be generally consistent with the median total director compensation package paid by companies within our peer group. Mercer also advised that the additional annual stipends paid to the Lead Director and the three committee chairs in 2021 continued to be generally consistent with the median of such stipends paid by companies within our peer group. Taking Mercer’s review into account, the Governance and Nominating Committee recommended that no changes be made to the directors’ compensation package for 2021. As such, in 2021, each non-management director received a cash stipend of $120,000 as well as an equity award with a grant date fair value of approximately $170,000 (both of which were unchanged from the amounts awarded to our non-management directors in 2020). For 2021, the additional annual stipends paid to the Lead Director and the three committee chairs remained unchanged from 2020, and were as follows: Lead Director, $35,000; Audit and Compliance Committee chair, $20,000; Compensation Committee chair, $15,000; and Governance and Nominating Committee chair, $12,250.

The annual cash stipend payable to all non-management directors and the additional annual stipends payable to the Lead Director and the three committee chairs were paid in quarterly installments for 2021. Non-management directors who served for only a portion of the year received a pro rata portion of the annual cash stipend. No separate meeting attendance fees are paid to the directors. All directors are reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses arising from attendance at meetings of the Board and its committees.

Prior to the beginning of the calendar year, a non-management director may elect to defer some or all of their cash compensation for the upcoming year into a cash account or stock unit account pursuant to the Company’s Directors’ Fees Deferral Plan, amended and restated as of May 11, 2021.

16

When making a deferral election, a non-management director may elect to receive payment for the deferred amounts in a lump sum or in annual installments beginning either upon the last day of the fiscal quarter following his or her (i) separation from service with the Company or (ii) attainment of an age specified in advance by the non-management director. For 2021, Dr. Krishnan elected to defer the entire amount of his cash compensation into a cash account under the Company’s Directors’ Fees Deferral Plan. None of the other non-management directors elected to defer any portion of their cash compensation payable for 2021.

In March 2021, at the same time that management’s long-term incentive (“LTI”) awards were granted, each of our non-management directors was granted 19,296 restricted stock units in respect of the equity portion of the non-management directors’ compensation. On the date of grant, these awards had an actual award value of approximately $170,000 per non-management director, which represented the number of restricted stock units valued at $170,000 (based on the closing market price of our Common Stock on that date of $8.81/share) rounded to the nearest whole number of units.

Any non-management director who joins our Board during the first six months of the year will receive the same number of restricted stock units as is awarded to the other non-management directors as stock-based compensation for that year; however, if a non-management director’s appointment occurs during the last six months of the year such non-management director will receive no stock-based compensation for that year. For example, Dr. Hastings joined the Board during the 3^rd quarter of 2021, and, therefore, did not receive any stock-based compensation for 2021.

The restricted stock unit awards to our non-management directors vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date for so long as the director is a member of the Board. If a non-management director’s service as a member of the Board terminates as a result of death, disability, or for any other reason (other than “for cause”), all unvested restricted stock units held by such non-management director will vest as of the date of termination. A non-management director may elect, prior to the beginning of the calendar year in which the award is granted, to defer the receipt of shares of the Company’s Common Stock issuable upon vesting of the restricted stock units until either his or her (i) separation from service with the Company or (ii) attainment of an age specified in advance by the non-management director. In the absence of a prior deferral election, the non-management director will receive shares of the Company’s Common Stock issuable upon the vesting of such restricted stock units. Drs. Jennings, Krishnan and Williams and Mr. Ely elected to defer the receipt of shares of the Company’s Common Stock issuable upon vesting of the restricted stock units granted to each of them on March 1, 2021.

Management directors do not receive any additional compensation for their service on the Board.

17

Non-Management Director Compensation

The following table summarizes the aggregate fees earned and the value of equity-based awards earned by our then-serving non-management directors for 2021.

How are Directors nominated by the Company?

The Governance and Nominating Committee has responsibility for the director nomination process.

The Governance and Nominating Committee believes that the minimum qualifications that must be met by any director nominee, including any director nominee who is recommended by stockholders, include (i) a reputation for the highest ethical and moral standards, (ii) good judgment, (iii) a positive record of achievement, (iv) if on other boards, an excellent reputation for preparation, attendance,

18

participation, interest and initiative, (v) business knowledge and experience relevant to the Company, and (vi) a willingness to devote sufficient time to carrying out his or her duties and responsibilities effectively.

The qualities and skills necessary in a director nominee are governed by the specific needs of the Board at the time the Governance and Nominating Committee determines to nominate a candidate for director. The specific requirements of the Board will be determined by the Governance and Nominating Committee and will be based on, among other things, the Company’s then-existing strategies and business, market and regulatory environments, and the mix of perspectives, experience and competencies then represented by the other Board members. The Governance and Nominating Committee will also take into account the views of the Executive Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer as to areas in which management desires additional advice and counsel.

When the need to recruit a director arises, the Governance and Nominating Committee will consult the other directors, including the Executive Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer and, when deemed appropriate, utilize fee-paid third-party recruiting firms to identify potential candidates. The candidate evaluation process may include inquiries as to the candidate’s reputation and background, examination of the candidate’s experiences and skills in relation to the Board’s requirements at the time, consideration of the candidate’s independence as measured by the Company’s independence standards, and other considerations as the Governance and Nominating Committee deems appropriate at the time. Prior to formal consideration by the Governance and Nominating Committee, any candidate who passes such screening would be interviewed by the chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Executive Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer. The nomination of Dr. Hastings, who was appointed to our Board in September 2021, and Ms. Brooks, who our Board has nominated to stand for election at this Annual Meeting, were consistent with the above-described process. Our Executive Chairman introduced Dr. Hastings to the Governance and Nominating Committee for its consideration as a potential addition to the Board based on his knowledge of Dr. Hastings’ professional background and other attributes. In addition, following the death of our director, Julia B. North, in December 2021, Ms. Brooks was recommended to our Executive Chairman by a former colleague of Ms. Brooks as a potential candidate to join the Board due to her colleague’s knowledge of her professional background and other attributes. Thereafter, our Executive Chairman introduced Ms. Brooks to the Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee subsequently followed the above-described process in determining to appoint Dr. Hastings to our Board in September 2021 and in determining to nominate Ms. Brooks to stand for election to our Board at the upcoming Annual Meeting. The Board approved their appointment and nomination, respectively.

What diversity considerations are evaluated in nominating Directors?

As set forth in the charter of the Governance and Nominating Committee, the nominating criteria require the committee to “determine as necessary the portfolio of skills, experience, perspective and background required for the effective functioning of the Board.” The most robust selection process occurs at the time a new director is being added. The Governance and Nominating Committee takes into account a variety of factors in selecting and nominating individuals to serve on the Board, including:

19

The Governance and Nominating Committee seeks candidates with broad backgrounds and experience that will enable them to serve on and contribute to any of the Board’s three standing committees. In addition, every director nominee should demonstrate a strong record of integrity and ethical conduct, an absence of conflicts that might interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment, and a willingness and ability to represent all stockholders of the Company.

The experience and skills of each of the members of the Board is described below under “Members of the Board of Directors.” The Governance and Nominating Committee considers and assesses these contributions and the effectiveness of its nominating criteria in connection with nominating individuals to serve on the Board.

Three of our 11 incumbent directors are racially and/or ethnically diverse. In addition, one of our 11 incumbent directors as well as our new director nominee are female. Moreover, our Board included two female members prior to the death of Julia B. North in December 2021. As noted above, the Governance and Nominating Committee takes into account gender, racial, ethnic and cultural diversity considerations when selecting and nominating individuals to serve on our Board. The following charts show the percentage of our director nominees (including both the incumbent directors and the new director nominee) who are diverse based on gender and race/ethnicity, respectively.

How can stockholders nominate or recommend individuals to serve on the Company’s Board?

There are two ways in which stockholders can participate in the nomination process.

20

When evaluating any director recommendations or nominations properly submitted by a stockholder as set forth above, the Governance and Nominating Committee will conduct the same analysis that it conducts with respect to its director nominees or other potential candidates recommended by a Board member, management, a search firm or other source.

How can I submit a stockholder proposal or bring business for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders?

If a stockholder seeks to have a proposal included in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, the proposal must be received by the Company no later than December 1, 2022 and be submitted in accordance with applicable SEC rules, including Rule 14a-8. Such proposals must be delivered to Community Health Systems, Inc., Attn: Corporate Secretary, 4000 Meridian Boulevard, Franklin, TN 37067.

If a stockholder seeks to bring business before our annual meeting that is not the subject of a proposal submitted for inclusion in the proxy statement under Rule 14a-8 (excluding director nominations, which are discussed above under “How can stockholders nominate or recommend individuals to serve on the Company’s Board?”), such stockholder must bring such business in compliance with the advance notice procedures described in the By-laws. For the Company’s 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Corporate Secretary must receive notice of such business no earlier than January 15, 2023 and no later than February 14, 2023 (or, if the annual meeting is called

21

for a date that is not within 30 days of May 10, 2023, the notice must be received by the later of the date that is 90 days prior to such annual meeting or the 10^th day following the date such annual meeting is first publicly announced or disclosed). In addition, any such business to be brought before our annual meeting must be in proper written form and must meet the detailed disclosure and other requirements applicable to such matters set forth in the advance notice provisions of the Company’s By-laws.

22

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Each of the Company’s director nominees are nominated for election to a term of one (1) year. Upon the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, the twelve (12) persons listed in the table below are nominated for election at the Meeting, each to serve as a director for a term of one (1) year and until his or her successor is elected and qualified.

Lead Director

Compensation Committee Member

Mr. Clerico serves as our Lead Director. Since 2000, when Mr. Clerico co-founded ChartMark Investments, Inc., a registered investment advisor providing portfolio management, investment consulting and financial planning solutions to individuals, small businesses and institutions, he has served as its chairman and as a registered financial advisor. From 2006 until 2012, Mr. Clerico served on the board of directors of Global Industries, Ltd., a provider of solutions for offshore oil and gas construction, engineering, project management and support services, with prior service on its audit, compensation and finance (chair) committees. In 2008, Mr. Clerico resigned from these committees upon his appointment as chairman of the board and interim chief executive officer. He stepped down as Global Industries, Ltd.’s interim chief executive officer in 2010 but continued to serve as chairman of its board through 2011, when Global Industries, Ltd. was acquired by Technip S.A. From 1992 to April 2000, he served as an executive vice president and chief financial officer and on the board of directors of Praxair, a supplier of industrial gases and coatings and related healthcare services and technologies. From 1983 until its spin-off of Praxair in 1992, he served as an executive officer of Union Carbide Corporation in various financial and accounting areas. Mr. Clerico serves on the board of directors of Educational Development Corporation, a trade publisher and distributor of children’s books, where he serves as lead independent director as well as on its on its audit (chair), nominating and corporate governance (chair), compensation, and executive committees. He previously served on the board of MacroSolve, Inc., a provider of consulting services related to the development, marketing and financing of mobile app businesses, where he also served on its audit (chair) and compensation committees.

Mr. Clerico brings executive leadership experience and skills to the Board. He has held the positions of chairman of the board, chief executive officer, co-chief operating officer, chief financial officer and treasurer at various points of his career. His extensive experience in industries (chemical and industrial gases) with a high risk profile give him a unique perspective on risk oversight. In

23

addition, his prior service as chair of both our Board’s Audit and Compliance Committee and Compensation Committee lend important continuity to the Board’s financial, audit, compliance and compensation oversight functions. Finally, having formed and operated his own investment company, Mr. Clerico also brings the investor perspective to the Board’s review activities.

Audit and Compliance Committee Chair

Mr. Dinkins has served as president and chief executive officer of Dinkins Financial, a consulting firm that helps small businesses gain access to capital, since October 2017. From 2008 until May 2012, Mr. Dinkins served on the board of directors of Integer Holdings Corporation (formerly known as Greatbatch, Inc.), a medical device outsource manufacturer, where he also served on its audit committee and compensation and organization committee. In May 2012, Mr. Dinkins resigned from Integer Holdings Corporation’s board of directors and its committees in conjunction with his

appointment as senior vice president (later executive vice president) and chief financial officer of Integer Holdings Corporation, a position he held until his retirement in March 2017. From 2008 until 2012, Mr. Dinkins served as executive vice president and chief financial officer of USI Insurance Services, an insurance intermediary company. From 2005 until 2008, he was executive vice president and chief financial officer of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co., an insurance and risk management services company. Mr. Dinkins was vice president, global control & reengineering at Guidant Corporation from 2004 to 2005, and vice president and chief financial officer for NCR Worldwide Customer Service Operation from 2002 to 2004. Prior to 2002, he held senior positions at Access Worldwide Communications, Inc., Cadmus Communications Group and General Electric Company. Mr. Dinkins serves on the board of directors of Crane Co., a manufacturer of industrial products in the chemicals, oil and gas, power, automated payment solutions, banknote design and production, and aerospace and defense markets and serves on its audit and compliance committee. He also serves on the board of directors of The Shyft Group, Inc., a manufacturer and upfitter of specialty vehicles for the commercial, retail and service specialty vehicle markets, and serves on its audit and compliance committee. He is a former director of LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc. Mr. Dinkins also served on the National Council on Compensation Insurance from 2015 to 2020, including service on its audit, finance, and governance committees.

Mr. Dinkins brings extensive experience as a board member and a chief financial officer of a publicly-traded company to the Board, as well as knowledge of complex financial and operational issues facing large organizations and an understanding of operations and financial strategy in challenging environments. Through his role as a chief financial officer, he has also overseen the information technology risk assessment processes of a company. In addition, Mr. Dinkins brings the perspective of the insurance industry and the medical device industry to the Board, both of which are important related industries for the Company. Mr. Dinkins is National Association of Corporate directors (NACD) Directorship Certified.

Compensation Committee Chair

Audit and Compliance Committee Member

Mr. Ely founded PriCap Advisors, LLC, an investment management firm, in 2009 and has served as its chief executive officer since its inception. From 1995 to 2008, he was a Managing Director in the Leveraged Finance Group at JPMorgan Chase & Co., where he was responsible for structuring and arranging syndicated loans and high yield issues in the healthcare, aerospace, defense and other sectors. Mr. Ely’s service with JPMorgan’s predecessor institutions commenced in 1987. He serves on the board of directors of Select Medical Holdings Corporation, a provider of long-term hospitalization services, and serves as chair of both its audit and compliance and nominating and corporate governance committees.

24

Mr. Ely’s educational background (MBA in finance and accounting from the University of Chicago) and extensive (over twenty years) experience in the financing industry, and in the healthcare sector in particular, provide a needed area of expertise among the independent Board members. In addition, his years of prior service as the chair of our Board’s Audit and Compliance Committee provides valuable continuity to the Board’s financial, audit, and compliance oversight functions. Finally, he is able to assist the Board members and management in evaluating financing opportunities, as he has specific experience in financing the types of indebtedness reflected on the Company’s balance sheet.

Governance and Nominating Committee Chair

Compensation Committee Member

Mr. Fry has served as president of Drexel University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania since 2010. Prior to becoming president of Drexel University, Mr. Fry served as president of Franklin & Marshall College in Lancaster, Pennsylvania from 2002 until 2010. From 1995 to 2002, he was executive vice president of the University of Pennsylvania and served as the chief operating officer of the university and as a member of the executive committee of the University of Pennsylvania Health System. Mr. Fry also serves on the board of directors of vTV Therapeutics Inc., a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company focused on the discovery and development of human therapeutics, and serves on its compensation committee (chair) and audit committee. He is a member of the board of trustees of Macquarie Investment Management (formerly Delaware Investments), an asset management firm, with oversight responsibility for all of the portfolios in that mutual fund family; he also serves on its audit committee and its nominating and corporate governance committee. Mr. Fry also serves on the board of directors of FS Investment Credit Real Estate Income Trust Inc., an alternative asset manager, where he serves on its audit committee.

Mr. Fry’s experience as the president of an academic institution, together with his prior experience with the University of Pennsylvania Health System and service on the boards of a number of non-profit institutions, brings two important perspectives to the Board. His familiarity with the governance issues faced by non-profit organizations assists the Board in understanding the competitive environment in which many of the Company’s competitors and acquisition targets operate. His educational background (MBA in accounting from New York University) and his experience in financial management, financial reporting, audit and compliance, and risk management are all skill sets available to and needed by the Board.

Governance and Nominating Committee Member

Dr. Hastings is a private practice orthodontist in Mobile, Alabama with over 37 years of health care experience. Dr. Hasting previously served on the board of directors of Quorum Health Corporation, an operator of general acute care hospitals and outpatient services, from 2016 until 2020, where he also served on its compensation committee, governance committee, and patient safety and quality of care committee. He has served in numerous dental and orthodontic leadership positions in local, state, and national societies. Dr. Hastings is board certified in orthodontics and has been published in several orthodontic journals. He also holds two United States patents. Dr. Hastings graduated with honors from the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry, and completed his post-doctoral training at the Louisiana State University School of Dentistry in New Orleans.

Dr. Hastings brings the perspective of a health care practitioner as well as prior experience as a public-company board member to the Board. His experience in managing a health care practice is similar to that of many of the Company’s affiliated physician practices, and he can provide valuable advice to the Board and management regarding trends in both medicine and the organization and operation of health care practices.

25

Mr. Hingtgen has served as our Chief Executive Officer since January 2021. Prior to that, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer from September 2016 through December 2020. In his role as Chief Executive Officer, he is responsible for strategic and operational priorities of the Company, and providing oversight and direction to the senior corporate and regional operations leaders who directly support the Company’s affiliated markets and related acute and ambulatory offerings. Mr. Hingtgen joined us in 2008 as a vice president of division operations, and, in January 2014, he was promoted to division president. In that position, he oversaw the operations of our affiliated markets in the western United States. In May 2016, Mr. Hingtgen was promoted again to executive vice president of operations. In that position he worked directly with the Company’s chief executive officer, chief operating officer and chief financial officer to advance the Company’s strategic priorities and to help elevate operational and financial performance in key markets. Mr. Hingtgen has over 20 years of healthcare management experience. Prior to joining us, he held chief executive officer and chief operating officer positions at for-profit hospitals in Arizona, Indiana and Nevada. Mr. Hingtgen has a master’s degree in business administration from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

As the Company’s chief executive officer, Mr. Hingtgen brings a deep perspective on the strategic development of the Company and its business lines, as well as the operation of hospitals, outpatient care centers, and integrated network delivery systems. His vision and implementation of the corporate-wide efforts to strengthen the Company’s overall operations and support of organic growth and the delivery of high quality healthcare services are needed inputs on the Board’s development of its agenda.

Audit and Compliance Committee Member

Compensation Committee Member

Ms. Hirsch is currently retired. She served as vice president and controller of Praxair from 2010 until her retirement in August 2016. In that role, she was responsible for Praxair’s global financial statement consolidation and SEC reporting. Prior to becoming controller, Ms. Hirsch served as Praxair’s director and then vice president of investor relations from 2002 until 2010. In that role she was recognized as the Best Investor Relations Professional in the Chemicals Sector by both buy-side and sell-side analysts in a 2011 Institutional Investor Survey. Ms. Hirsch joined Praxair in 1995 as director of corporate finance and later served as assistant treasurer. Prior to joining Praxair, she had fifteen years of experience in corporate banking, primarily at Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company. Ms. Hirsch also serves on the board of trustees of Devereux Advanced Behavioral Health, a non-profit organization providing services and leadership in the field of behavioral health. She is a member of Devereux’s executive committee, finance committee (chair), audit and compliance committee and clinical committee. Ms. Hirsch is also a trustee of the Helena Devereux Foundation. In addition, she is chair of the board of directors of the Women’s Business Development Council of Connecticut.

Ms. Hirsch’s educational background (MBA in finance from New York University) and her years of experience as a senior accounting and finance executive in a large publicly-traded corporation provide the Board with valuable additional insight in the areas of accounting and finance, including financial statement preparation, internal controls, SEC reporting and financings similar to the Company’s outstanding indebtedness. She also brings investor relations expertise to the Board, including an understanding of the perspective of institutional investors.

26

Governance and Nominating Committee Member

Dr. Jennings is currently retired. For more than 43 years, he was a practicing family medicine physician, most recently with KentuckyOne Health, in Louisville, Kentucky, which was formed by the merger of Jewish Hospital & St. Mary’s HealthCare with Saint Joseph Health System in 2012. He served on KentuckyOne Health’s quality committee and formerly served as the quality committee chair for The Physician Group, which was affiliated with Jewish Hospital & St. Mary’s HealthCare prior to its merger with Saint Joseph Health System. From 1971 until 2005, when the practice was acquired by Jewish Hospital, Dr. Jennings was in private practice with Southend Medical Clinic, PSC, serving as its managing partner.

Dr. Jennings brings the perspective of a physician to the Board. His career in a community practice setting is typical to that of most of the Company’s facilities and he provides advice to the Board and management about trends in medicine as well as the organization and operation of physician practices. His experience managing large physician practices, with particular focus in the areas of risk and quality oversight, offers the Board a physician’s viewpoint in these areas. He also brings practitioner insight to quality measures and reporting, electronic health record implementation, and federal government regulation of practitioner-hospital relationships.

Governance and Nominating Committee Member

Dr. Krishnan has served since 2019 as the chief executive officer of Rush University System for Health, an internationally known academic health center and health system in Chicago, Illinois. He also serves as a professor in the department of psychiatry at Rush Medical College. From 2015 to 2019, Dr. Krishnan served as dean of Rush Medical College and as senior vice president of Rush University Medical Center. He serves as a member of the board of directors of Singapore Health Services (SingHealth), the largest healthcare system in Singapore, and also serves as chairman of the National Medical Research Council and the National Health Innovation Center Singapore. From 2008 to 2015, Dr. Krishnan served as dean at the Duke-NUS Medical School, a joint venture between Duke University, in Durham, North Carolina and the National University of Singapore, in Singapore. Prior to and during his tenure in Singapore, Dr. Krishnan was a professor in the department of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Duke University Medical Center, including serving as chairman of psychiatry and behavioral sciences from 1998 to 2009. He is a member of several professional societies, including the American Psychiatric Association, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the New York Academy of Sciences, and the National Academy of Medicine. Dr. Krishnan has also received numerous honors and awards, including the Distinguished Scientist Award from the American Association of Geriatric Psychiatry and the Public Service Medal (Friend of Singapore) from the president of Singapore for his service to that country.

Dr. Krishnan’s service as an executive and administrator at a large medical center and as the dean of two medical schools provides the Board with valuable experience in the management of physician practices and in maintaining compliance with the complex regulatory requirements of the hospital and healthcare industries.

Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors

Mr. Smith has served as the Executive Chairman of our Board of Directors since January 2021. He has been a member of the Board since April 1997 and has served as Chairman since 2001. Mr. Smith joined us in January 1997 as President, a position he held until January 2014. From April 1997 through

27

December 2020, he served as our Chief Executive Officer. Prior to joining us, Mr. Smith was president and chief operating officer of Humana Inc., where he served in various management positions during 23 years with that company and as a director from 1993 to 1996. Mr. Smith also serves on the board of trustees of Auburn University. He previously served on the board of directors of Praxair from July 2001 until its merger with Linde AG in October 2018, with service initially on Praxair’s audit committee and later on its compensation committee (former chair). Mr. Smith is the past-chair of the board of the Federation of American Hospitals. He is also the past-chair and a former board member of both the Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce and the Nashville Health Care Council. Mr. Smith is the uncle of Austen D. (Drew) Mason, who serves as the Regional President — Region 1 Operations of the Company as noted below.

Mr. Smith is one of the most tenured executives in the healthcare industry, with decades of experience in both the hospital and outpatient facilities sector and the managed care sector. He was named one of the 100 Most Influential People in Healthcare in Modern Healthcare’s peer-voted list for 19 consecutive years. Institutional Investor magazine named Mr. Smith a Top CEO for the healthcare facilities sector multiple times. Mr. Smith was honored on several occasions as being one of the top chief executive officers in the institutional provider segment of the healthcare sector. In addition, his experience serving on other companies’ boards of directors provides him with insight and experiences to support his leadership of the Company’s Board of Directors.

Audit and Compliance Committee Member

Dr. Williams has served as president of Mount St. Joseph University in Cincinnati, Ohio since March 2016. Mount St. Joseph University provides interdisciplinary liberal arts and professional curricula to its students, including a number of graduate and doctoral healthcare programs. Prior to that, he served as president of Fisk University, a leading liberal arts university located in Nashville, Tennessee, from February 2013 until September 2015. Fisk University is renowned for its leadership role and history in the education of African-American students. Dr. Williams also served as dean and a professor of accounting at the Seidman College of Business of Grand Valley State University in Grand Rapids, Michigan from 2004 until 2013. From 2006 until 2013, Dr. Williams served on the board of trustees of St. Mary’s Hospital, a non-profit hospital in Grand Rapids, Michigan. From 1999 until 2004, he was dean and a professor of accounting at the School of Business of North Carolina Central University in Durham, North Carolina. From 1994 to 1999, Dr. Williams was dean of the School of Management and a professor of accounting at Delaware State University in Dover, Delaware. Prior to that, he held faculty positions in the business schools at several universities. Dr. Williams also serves on the boards of several non-profit organizations. He previously served on the advisory board of Fifth Third Bank of Tennessee and as a member of the Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority’s Air Service Coalition. Dr. Williams has also practiced law, primarily in the areas of partnership and corporate tax, as well as contract law. He started his diverse career as an accountant with Ernst & Young where he worked in the audit division with companies in the banking, textiles, automotive and shipping industries.

Dr. Williams’ educational background (MBA in accounting from the University of Wisconsin-Madison; Ph.D. in accounting from University of Georgia; and J.D. and LL.M. degrees from Georgetown University Law Center) and his extensive teaching experience provide additional accounting expertise to the Board. Additionally, his diverse experience, including serving as president of academic institutions and service on the boards of a number of non-profit institutions and a bank, bring a unique perspective to the Board.

28

Ms. Brooks is a former Congresswoman and former U.S. Attorney. From 2013 to 2021, she served as the U.S. Representative for the 5th District of Indiana, where she was instrumental in legislation to reform emergency response, healthcare, manufacturing, technology innovation, higher education and public safety. Ms. Brooks served as the Chair for the House Ethics Committee and was a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. She also held subcommittee roles in Health; Communications and Technology; Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade; and Oversight and Investigations. Ms. Brooks served on the Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress and on the House Committee on Education and Workforce and Homeland Security Committee. She also co-founded the 5G Caucus with a goal of positioning the United States as a leader in 5G wireless technology. Ms. Brooks co-chaired the Women’s Caucus and Women in High Tech Coalition and served as the Recruitment Chair for the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC). In this role, she recruited 94 women and 75 minority candidates who stood for election to Congress on general election ballots. Prior to serving in Congress, Ms. Brooks was Senior Vice President and General Counsel for Ivy Tech Community College, the public community college system for the state of Indiana, from 2007 to 2012. From 2001 to 2007, she served as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana, where she oversaw the prosecution of Medicaid fraud and illegal opioid prescriptions. Prior to her appointment as U.S. Attorney, Ms. Brooks’ broad professional experience included practicing criminal defense law and later government services law at law firms in Indianapolis, Indiana. She also served as Deputy Mayor for the City of Indianapolis overseeing public safety operations and helped manage law enforcement and emergency response efforts. Ms. Brooks serves on the board of directors of First Merchants Corporation, a Nasdaq-listed financial holding company headquartered in central Indiana, and serves on its Nominating and Governance Committee. She also serves on the board of directors of Team Health Holdings, Inc., a leading physician practice company. Ms. Brooks has served on several non-profit boards, including Ascension St. Vincent Hospital in Indianapolis. Ms. Brooks has received numerous awards, including the Congressional Champion Award from the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs and the Congressional Leadership Award from the Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of America, both in 2020; and the Champion of Healthcare Innovation Award from the Healthcare Leadership Council and the Legislator of the Year from the Indiana Health Industry Forum, both in 2015.

Ms. Brooks’ deep knowledge of and experience in both the legislative and judicial branches of the Federal government provide our Board with valuable insight into the governmental processes and priorities that impact the heavily-regulated industry in which we operate. In addition, her diverse experience, including advising public and privately-held companies, non-profits, educational institutions, and hospitals, gives her valuable insight both related to the healthcare industry as well as to other sectors with which our Company frequently interacts.

29

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information as of March 14, 2022, except as otherwise footnoted, with respect to ownership of our Common Stock by:

Except as otherwise indicated, the persons or entities listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by them, except to the extent such power may be shared with a spouse. Ownership percentages are calculated based on 134,673,587 shares of our Common Stock outstanding as of March 14, 2022.

30

31

RELATIONSHIPS AND CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND 5% BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS

Except as otherwise noted below, since January 1, 2021, the Company has not been a participant in any transaction, and is not a participant in any currently proposed transaction, in which any related party had or will have a direct or indirect material interest that would require disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K.

On February 28, 2022, CHSPSC, LLC entered into a retainer agreement with Benjamin C. Fordham, the Company’s former Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary, upon his retirement. The Company believes that the compensation paid to Mr. Fordham under his retainer agreement is on terms as favorable to the Company as could have been maintained with an unrelated third party. Pursuant to the retainer agreement, Mr. Fordham provides certain consulting services related to legal matters as requested by our Chief Executive Officer or his designee. The term of the retainer agreement is from March 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024. During the term of the retainer agreement, Mr. Fordham receives consulting fees of $25,000 per month and he is subject to restrictions on solicitation and conflicts of interest with the Company or its affiliates. For the duration of the retainer agreement, Mr. Fordham’s previously granted stock options will remain in effect in accordance with the applicable terms of their grant. He will also continue to vest in previously granted restricted stock of the Company in accordance with the applicable time-vesting schedule.

A subsidiary of the Company employs Rebecca Pitt, the spouse of Justin D. Pitt, who became an executive officer when he was named Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of the Company, effective March 1, 2022. Ms. Pitt serves as a Vice President of Corporate Communications, a position she held prior to her marriage to Mr. Pitt. Mr. Pitt has no input or oversight regarding Ms. Pitt’s compensation and other terms of employment, which are consistent with those of other employees of Ms. Pitt’s level of responsibility, seniority and performance. Ms. Pitt’s total compensation for 2022, including base salary, target cash bonus and the grant date fair value of all equity awards is not expected to exceed $300,000.

32

The Company applies the following policy and procedure with respect to related person transactions. Any potential related party transactions are first referred to our General Counsel to determine if they are within the scope of the Company’s written related party transactions policy. Under the Company’s policy, “related person transaction” means those transactions, arrangements or relationships involving the Company and any of its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any “related person,” on the other hand, excluding any exempted transactions (as described below). Under this policy, a “related person” is defined to mean any person who is, or at any time since the beginning of the Company’s last fiscal year was, a director or an executive officer of the Company, any director nominee, any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons, any person who, at the time of the occurrence or existence of the transaction at issue, is known to the Company to be a beneficial owner of 5% or more of the Company’s Common Stock (our only class of voting securities) or any immediate family member of such owner, or any entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a general partner or principal or in a similar position or in which any of the foregoing persons has a 5% or more beneficial ownership interest. The Company’s policy exempts related person transactions if it is determined by our General Counsel that the direct or indirect interest a related person had, has or will have in the transaction is not material or that such transaction is not otherwise required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K. If any such transaction is within the scope of the Company’s related party transactions policy, the transaction must be reviewed by the Audit and Compliance Committee (or, in those instances in which our General Counsel, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer, determines that it is not practicable or desirable for the Company to wait until the next Committee meeting, will be reviewed by the Chair of the Audit and Compliance Committee, who has delegated authority to act between Committee meetings) to consider and determine whether, among other factors, the benefits of the relationship outweigh the potential conflicts inherent in such relationships and whether the transaction is otherwise in compliance with the Company’s Code of Conduct and other policies, including for example, the independence standards of the Governance Guidelines of the Board of Directors. Related person transactions are reviewed not less frequently than annually if they are to continue beyond the year in which the transaction is initiated.

The Audit and Compliance Committee approved the terms of the retainer agreement with Mr. Fordham noted above prior to the entry into such retainer agreement, and the Audit and Compliance Committee approved the 2022 employment terms of Ms. Pitt prior to Mr. Pitt becoming an executive officer, effective March 1, 2022, as noted above, and the Company otherwise complied with its related person transaction policy as noted above in connection with such transactions.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

During 2021, John A. Clerico, John A. Fry and Julia B. North (until her death on December 9, 2021) served as members of the Compensation Committee. None of these persons has at any time been an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. In addition, there are no relationships among our executive officers, members of the Compensation Committee or entities whose executives serve on the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee that require disclosure under applicable rules of the SEC.

33

INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following sets forth information regarding our executive officers as of March 14, 2022. Each of our executive officers holds an identical position with CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., and CHSPSC, LLC, two of our wholly-owned subsidiaries:

Wayne T. Smith — The principal occupation and employment experience of Mr. Smith during the last five years is set forth on page 27 of this Proxy Statement.

Tim L. Hingtgen — The principal occupation and employment experience of Mr. Hingtgen during the last five years is set forth on page 26 of this Proxy Statement

Kevin J. Hammons serves as President and Chief Financial Officer. He joined us in 1997, and, in 2002, he was promoted to Assistant Vice President (later Vice President), Financial Reporting. In 2012, he was promoted to Vice President (later Senior Vice President) and Chief Accounting Officer. In 2017, Mr. Hammons was named Assistant Chief Financial Officer, and in 2018, he was also named Treasurer. In those roles, he was responsible for overseeing accounting and financial reporting, SEC reporting, budgeting, design and implementation of financial systems and processes, capital market transactions, corporate finance and treasury management functions, and the Company’s divestiture program. Mr. Hammons was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in 2020 and to President and Chief Financial Officer in February 2021. Prior to joining us, Mr. Hammons served in various positions in the Assurance and Advisory Services practice at Ernst & Young LLP from 1988 until 1997, serving both public and privately-held companies. Mr. Hammons previously served as a member of the Board of Trustees of Malone University in Canton, Ohio.

Lynn T. Simon, M.D. serves as President of Clinical Operations and Chief Medical Officer. She has leadership responsibilities for all aspects of clinical operations, including quality and safety, clinical service lines, nursing, case management and post-acute services, including inpatient rehabilitation, skilled nursing and behavioral health. She also oversees medical staff relations, physician practice management, clinical informatics, telemedicine initiatives, and corporate support areas such as pharmacy and clinical documentation improvement. Upon joining us in 2010 and until she assumed her current position in January 2014, Dr. Simon served as Senior Vice President and Chief Quality Officer. She serves on the board of directors of Ascend Learning, LLC, a leading provider of educational content, software and analytics to institutions, students and employers in healthcare and other high-growth, licensure-driven professions, and also serves on its audit committee. Dr. Simon also served on the board of directors of Kindred Healthcare, Inc., a provider of post-acute care services, and on its audit committee and its quality of care and patient outcomes committee, from November 2016 until Kindred’s acquisition by a consortium led by Humana, Inc., in July 2018. Prior to joining us, Dr. Simon served as vice president of medical affairs at Jewish Hospital in Louisville, Kentucky from 2004 to 2005

34

and as senior vice president and chief medical officer of Jewish Hospital & St. Mary’s HealthCare from 2005 to 2010, following the merger of Jewish Hospital and St. Mary’s HealthCare. She was a full-time practicing neurologist in Louisville, Kentucky from 1989 until 2005. She has a medical degree from the University of Louisville and a master’s degree in business administration from Bellarmine University in Louisville, Kentucky. Dr. Simon has been named to Modern Healthcare’s 50 Most Influential Physician Executives and Leaders list and Modern Healthcare’s biennial Top 25 Women in Healthcare list on multiple occasions.

Justin D. Pitt serves as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary. He joined us in 2009 as Litigation Counsel after several years of private practice as a litigator and lobbyist to the Tennessee General Assembly. In 2017, he was promoted to Senior Vice President and Chief Litigation Counsel. In that role, he served as our primary counsel for litigation, managed care, reimbursement and other legal matters and also oversaw the operations of the legal and government relations departments. He was promoted to Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary effective March 1, 2022. Mr. Pitt serves as a member of the American Health Lawyers Association and on the Federation of American Hospitals’ Medicaid and Managed Care Committee. He is a Fellow of the Nashville Health Care Council and a member of the Leaders Council of the Legal Services Corporation, the largest funder of civil legal aid for low income Americans in the United States. Mr. Pitt also serves on the boards of various non-profit organizations including One Willco and The Village at Glencliff, which provides medical respite and bridge housing for those experiencing homelessness. He received his law degree, Order of the Coif, from Washington University School of Law, where he was a William Webster Fellow.

Chad A. Campbell serves as the Regional President – Region 4 Operations. In this role, he oversees the operations of our affiliated markets in Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas. Mr. Campbell originally joined us in 2007 and served in hospital executive roles, including as chief executive officer, at various of our affiliated hospitals in the western United States. He was the chief executive officer at McKenzie-Willamette Medical Center, our formerly-affiliated hospital in Springfield, Oregon, when that hospital was included in our spin-off of Quorum Health Corporation in 2016. Mr. Campbell continued in that role with Quorum until 2018 when he rejoined us as a Vice President of Division Operations. He was promoted to Regional President in 2019. Mr. Campbell holds a master’s degree in health care administration from Trinity University.

Austen D. (Drew) Mason serves as the Regional President – Region 1 Operations. In this role, he oversees the operations of our affiliated markets in Alabama, Florida and Georgia. Mr. Mason joined us in 2009 and served in various corporate operations roles. From 2012 through 2020, he served as a hospital executive at various of our affiliated hospitals in the southeast United States, including as chief executive officer of Grandview Medical Center in Birmingham, Alabama, from 2017 through 2020. Mr. Mason was promoted to Regional President in January 2021. He holds a master’s degree in business administration with a specialization in healthcare from Vanderbilt University. Mr. Mason is the nephew of Wayne T. Smith, the Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company.

Mark B. Medley serves as the Regional President – Region 3 Operations. In this role, he oversees the operations of our affiliated markets in Indiana, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Mr. Medley joined us in this role in 2019. From 2018 to 2019, he was the chief executive officer and owner of Alee Healthcare Advisory Services. In that role, Mr. Medley provided healthcare advisory services to healthcare investors and healthcare providers. From 2016 to 2018, he was executive vice president and group president at RCCH Healthcare Partners, a privately-owned healthcare system operator in Brentwood, Tennessee. Mr. Medley also served in various senior executive roles with Capella Healthcare, Inc., a privately-owned healthcare system operator in Franklin, Tennessee, including service on Capella’s board of directors, from 2008 until Capella’s 2016 merger with RegionalCare Hospital Partners to form RCCH Healthcare Partners. Prior to that, Mr. Medley served in

35

both corporate and hospital executive roles, including as a division chief financial officer and a hospital chief executive officer and chief financial officer, with other healthcare system operators. He holds a master’s degree in business administration with a concentration in healthcare management from Western Governors University.

Kevin A. Stockton serves as the Regional President – Region 2 Operations. In this role, he oversees the operations of our affiliated markets in Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Missouri and New Mexico. Mr. Stockton joined us in 2011 as chief executive officer of Northwest Medical Center, the Company’s affiliated hospital in Tucson, Arizona. In 2015, he was promoted to market chief executive officer for Arizona. He was promoted to Regional President in 2017. Prior to joining us, Mr. Stockton served in hospital executive roles, including as chief executive officer and chief operating officer, for hospitals in the western United States. Mr. Stockton holds a master’s degree in public administration from the University of Arizona.

Jason K. Johnson serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. In this role, he is responsible for our Securities and Exchange Commission reporting matters, as well as overseeing various other accounting and financial reporting matters, including accounting policies and procedures, consolidations and accounting for acquisitions and divestitures. Mr. Johnson joined us in 2012 as Vice President, Assistant Corporate Controller, and in 2018 he was promoted to Vice President, Corporate Controller. In 2019, he was promoted to Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, and he was promoted to Senior Vice President in 2020. Prior to joining us, Mr. Johnson held various positions in the assurance and advisory services practice at Deloitte & Touche LLP. He also previously served as controller of an alternative energy marketing and distribution company. Mr. Johnson holds a master’s degree in accounting from the University of Kentucky. He is a member of the American Institute for Certified Public Accountants and Tennessee Society of Certified Public Accountants.

The executive officers named above were appointed by the Board to serve in such capacities until their respective successors have been duly appointed and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal from office.

PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Upon the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board has nominated the twelve (12) persons listed below for election to serve as directors, each for a term of one (1) year and until his or her successor is elected and qualified.

The nominees for director are:

Susan W. Brooks

John A. Clerico

Michael Dinkins

James S. Ely III

John A. Fry

Joseph A. Hastings, D.M.D.

Tim L. Hingtgen

Elizabeth T. Hirsch

William Norris Jennings, M.D.

K. Ranga Krishnan, MBBS

Wayne T. Smith

H. James Williams, Ph.D.

36

Each of the nominees, other than Ms. Brooks, is an incumbent. Each of the nominees has consented to being named as a director nominee in this Proxy Statement and has agreed to serve for the one (1) year term to which he or she has been nominated, if elected. If any of the nominees are unable to serve or refuses to serve as a director, the proxies will be voted in favor of such other nominee(s), if any, as the Board may designate. The Company has no reason to believe that any director nominee will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected as a director.

Required Vote

Each director nominee will be elected if he or she receives more votes “for” his or her election than “against” his or her election. Abstentions and broker non-votes in connection with the election of directors have no effect on such election. If any director nominee does not receive more votes “for” his or her election than “against,” then pursuant to the Governance Guidelines, that nominee is required to promptly submit his or her resignation to the Board following certification of the vote. The Governance and Nominating Committee (excluding any member of such committee whose resignation is to be considered) is required to consider the resignation and recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation or whether other action should be taken. The Board is required to take action on the recommendation within 90 days following certification of the vote, and promptly thereafter to publicly disclose its decision and the reasons therefor.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS A DIRECTOR.

PROPOSAL 2 — ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Consistent with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and as required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to express their views with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers. The vote is on an advisory basis and is non-binding and applies to the compensation disclosed in this Proxy Statement, which has been prepared in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

As described in detail under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” we seek to closely align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. Our compensation programs are designed to retain and reward our named executive officers for the achievement of short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals and the achievement of increased total shareholder return.

The Company’s executive compensation philosophy and program have consistently and proactively sought to be responsive to governance and stockholder concerns as evidenced by our stockholder outreach efforts and our responsiveness to feedback received in connection with those efforts. Our executive compensation program is overseen by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors (which is wholly-comprised of independent members of the Board), and our Compensation Committee engages an independent executive compensation consultant, Mercer, to advise the Compensation Committee.

Our executive compensation program has been designed, reviewed and modified over time to conform to governance best practices and to respond to investor feedback regarding pay practices. For example, a significant portion of the compensation payable to our named executive officers is in the form of at-risk variable compensation; we utilize multiple performance metrics in connection with both our cash incentive compensation and performance-based restricted stock awarded to our named executive officers; and each of our executives is an at-will employee.

37

Our Compensation Committee monitors changes in our industry and our business to ensure that the compensation elements continue to meet the goals of the program and the expectations of our stockholders and makes adjustments as necessary.

As described in detail under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” we achieved or exceeded our primary financial targets in 2021 and made progress on other key objectives intended to position the Company for future growth, while continuing to assist our affiliated hospitals and outpatient facilities in managing through the COVID-19 pandemic. Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, this performance is reflected in the compensation paid to our named executive officers for 2021.

The vote on this resolution is advisory, which means that the vote is not binding on the Company, our Board, or the Compensation Committee of our Board. To the extent there is any significant vote against our named executive officer compensation, the Compensation Committee will consider the results of this advisory vote and will evaluate whether any additional actions are necessary to address the concerns of stockholders.

Accordingly, we ask our stockholders to vote on the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables, and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock entitled to vote and present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting is required to approve this Proposal 2. Abstentions will be considered a vote against this proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on such matter since these votes will not be considered present and entitled to vote for this purpose.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

38

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Introduction

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our executive compensation program, explains how our Compensation Committee oversees and implements this program, and reviews the 2021 compensation for the executive officers identified below, who are our “named executive officers” for purposes of this Proxy Statement in accordance with SEC rules. Throughout this Compensation Discussion and Analysis and elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, we refer to this group of individuals as the “Named Executive Officers.”

As part of the Board’s ongoing leadership succession planning process, Mr. Hingtgen was appointed Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2021. Prior to that, Mr. Hingtgen served as the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer since September 2016 and has served on the Company’s Board of Directors since 2017. Unless otherwise noted, all references to our “Chief Executive Officer” or “CEO” in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis refer to Mr. Hingtgen.

Also effective January 1, 2021, Mr. Smith was appointed Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Smith served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer from 1997 and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 2001 until his appointment as Executive Chairman of the Board.

As a leading operator of general acute care hospitals and outpatient facilities within the healthcare industry, one of the nation’s largest and most dynamic industries, the Company must ensure that it attracts and retains the leadership and managerial talent needed to sustain its position in this rapidly changing industry. To remain competitive in the Company’s financial, capital and business markets, the Company views improving earnings and profitability as well as achieving growth as paramount objectives of the Company’s strategy. We believe these strategic objectives are fundamental points of alignment between stockholder value and the compensation of executive management.

In 2021, the Company delivered strong financial performance, despite the ongoing challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic. We believe that prior Company investments across our strategic imperatives, which have improved patient safety and quality, advanced operational excellence, enhanced patient connectivity, and strengthened our competitive position, continue to benefit the Company’s performance.

During 2021, the Company also executed across its initiatives and made additional investments throughout the organization, which we believe positions the Company for continued net revenue and Adjusted EBITDA growth. Investments to drive net revenue growth included advancing the transfer

39

center initiative, further building out our Accountable Care Organizations, primary care development, expanding service lines, adding new inpatient capacity, and increasing access points across the continuum of care. To further improve operating efficiency, the Company continued the execution of its margin improvement program, which contributed to additional cost savings during the year.

Complementing our growth and margin improvement initiatives have been improvements across our capital structure. During 2021, in addition to the Company extending a number of debt maturities, the Company also lowered annual cash interest and reduced its financial leverage through the Company’s debt capital market transactions.

We believe that the execution of our initiatives has strengthened the Company across multiple fronts and benefitted our financial performance. As a result, the Company delivered improvements in 2021 related to a number of key metrics. Due to these initiatives, we believe the Company is positioned to further improve performance and long-term stockholder value in the future.

Please see, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 17, 2022, for more details about the Company’s performance during 2021 and in prior years.

We achieved or exceeded our primary financial targets in 2021 and made progress on other key objectives intended to position the Company for future growth, while continuing to assist our affiliated hospitals and outpatient facilities in managing through the COVID-19 pandemic. Consistent with the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy, taking these factors into account, our Chief Executive Officer received 130% of his target cash incentive award for 2021 (in comparison, our then-serving Chief Executive Officer received 128% of his target cash incentive award during 2020).    

Our long-term incentive (“LTI”) mix further aligns our executive compensation program with stockholder interests by virtue of the fact that 75% of the LTI awards (based on the number of shares subject to such awards) granted to each of our named executive officers in 2021 was in the form of performance-based restricted stock or non-qualified stock options, which will result in value to the named executive officers only to the extent the Company achieves its long-term performance goals and/or our stock price increases in the future. The Compensation Committee generally utilizes a share-denominated approach to LTI grants. In other words, barring any promotions, changes in responsibilities, and/or changes in LTI market values within our peer group, the Committee generally does not modify the number of shares subject to option, time-based restricted stock or performance-based restricted stock grants to take into account changes in our share price that have occurred over the prior year. The Compensation Committee believes that this approach results in directly aligning our executives’ long-term incentive compensation with the interests of our stockholders. When the stock price declines, the value of an executive’s LTI award (and thus target total compensation) declines. When the stock price improves, the value of an executive’s LTI award (and thus target total compensation) increases. Within this framework, the Company increased the number of shares subject to LTI grants made to Mr. Hingtgen in 2021 compared to 2020 due to his promotion to Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2021; increased the number of shares subject to LTI grants made to Mr. Hammons in 2021 compared to 2020 due to his promotion to President and Chief Financial Officer (from Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer) in February 2021; increased the number of shares subject to LTI grants made to Dr. Simon in 2021 compared to 2020 to reflect her level of responsibility within the Company; and decreased the number of shares subject to LTI grants made to Mr. Smith in 2021 compared to 2020 due to the change in Mr. Smith’s role in connection with becoming Executive Chairman effective January 1, 2021. Between the LTI grant date in March 2020 and the LTI grant date in March 2021, our stock price improved from $4.93 to $8.81. Our stock price improved further to $13.31 at December 31, 2021. Despite the improvement in our stock price, the grant date fair value of the Company’s aggregate target LTI awards remained at or below the median of our peer group (as described below) in 2021.

40

Executive Summary

Compensation Program Objectives and Best Practices

The primary objectives of the Company’s executive compensation program are to:

Our executive compensation program has been designed, reviewed and modified over time to conform to governance best practices and to respond to investor feedback regarding pay practices. For example, the Company, over the years, has implemented the following policies:

41

A more detailed discussion of these policies and actions can be found on the following pages.

Over the years, we have continued to enhance and modify aspects of our executive compensation program, as appropriate, taking into account stockholder expectations and feedback in order to ensure that our executive compensation program continues to be structured in an optimal manner.

Key 2021 Compensation Designs/Outcomes

Taking into account our commitment to link pay and performance, the following compensation-related decisions were made for 2021:

42

The majority of our NEO compensation is performance-based and is issued in the form of both annual and long-term incentives. Individuals in a position to influence the growth of stockholder value have larger portions of their total compensation delivered in the form of equity-based long-term incentives. The target mix of the elements of the compensation program for the CEO and other NEOs is shown in the following charts which outline the size, in percentage terms, of each element of target compensation (based on the base salary amount, target short-term cash incentive opportunity and grant date fair value of equity grants made in 2021).

Stockholder Outreach and Responsiveness to Feedback

2021 Say on Pay Results and 2021 Stockholder Outreach Efforts

At our annual meeting of stockholders in May 2021, approximately 98% of the votes cast by our stockholders, excluding broker non-votes, were voted in favor of the Company’s advisory Say-on-Pay proposal with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers as described in our 2021 Proxy Statement. As our Compensation Committee has continued to review our compensation practices, it is mindful of the level of support received from our stockholders with respect to this Say-on-Pay proposal.

We conduct year-round proactive stockholder interaction and are committed to a continuing dialogue between stockholders and the Company to fully understand and consider stockholder perspectives on executive compensation and other topics that are important to our stockholders. In addition to our SEC filings, press releases, 2020/2021 Community Impact Report, 2021 Environmental Sustainability Report, and company website – we also communicate with stakeholders through

43

earnings calls and investor conferences. In addition, during 2021, we met or consulted with stockholders that held over 50% of our shares outstanding at that time to discuss topics that are important to our stockholders, including soliciting feedback on corporate governance matters and our executive compensation program. Moreover, our Lead Director, the members of our independent Compensation Committee and our other outside directors are available to speak directly with our stockholders if requested. Our Compensation Committee considers the feedback and suggestions we receive in light of both market best practices and what we believe to be necessary to execute a best-in-class compensation program that successfully addresses our senior executive talent attraction and retention needs.

2021 Program Changes

Our Compensation Committee and management, in consultation with Mercer, continued to evaluate our executive compensation program during 2021 in light of stockholder feedback, governance best practices, regulatory requirements, economic and industry factors, current trends in public company pay practices, and competitive considerations. In addition, we intend to make changes, as applicable, that both ensure the alignment between the interests of our stockholders and our executives and reflect industry-leading executive compensation programs.

After considering those objectives, our Compensation Committee made the following change to our executive compensation programs for 2021 in comparison to 2020:

We will continue to monitor market best practices and thoughtfully consider stockholder feedback in future years with respect to potential changes to our executive compensation programs.

ESG Program Change for 2022

In keeping with the Company’s commitment to ESG initiatives more broadly, in February 2022, the Compensation Committee added ESG goals as a component of the non-financial performance strategic and operational improvement goals in the annual cash incentive plan for our named executive officers in 2022. The ESG goals included continued advancement of the Company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion objectives and other environmental, social and governance objectives, such as those set forth in its Community Impact Report and Environmental Sustainability Report. For additional information regarding the Company’s ESG initiatives, see “What are the Company’s environmental, social and governance initiatives and where can I find additional information regarding these initiatives?“

44

2021 Guiding Principles and Compensation Framework

The core goals applied by the Company in implementing its executive compensation program for 2021 were to provide a mix of compensation vehicles that generated a compensation package that is competitive with an appropriate peer group, provides for the attainment of performance and growth objectives from both a short-term and long-term perspective, aligns the interests of executive management with stockholders, and retains and attracts valuable executive talent.

The guiding principles used by the Company during 2021 included:

The Company believes that the flexibility to make upward or downward adjustments as needed for individual performance, unusual market fluctuations, or extraordinary performance considerations, provides consistency and predictability to the Company’s executives and alignment of interests and transparency to the Company’s investors. Variations in pay levels for executives are based on factors such as internal equity, level of responsibility, individual performance, an individual’s tenure in his or her current role, and Company performance.

Components of our 2021 Executive Compensation Program

Peer Group

In accordance with the process described above, the Company utilizes a benchmark peer group in connection with determining the executive compensation for the named executive officers.

The Company regularly reviews the composition of its peer group to ensure comparability between the Company and its peer group. The only change to the Company’s peer group for 2021 as set forth below in comparison to 2020 is that WellCare Health Plans, Inc. was removed from the Company’s 2021 peer group following its acquisition by Centene Corporation.

45

The 2021 peer group included the other three publicly-traded major hospital management companies. In addition, given the limited number of large, publicly-traded hospital management companies, the 2021 peer group also included 12 other companies in the healthcare facilities, healthcare services, healthcare distribution, insurance or managed care areas. The 15 companies included in the 2021 peer group analysis were:

Peer Group Companies (for 2021 Compensation Cycle)

In selecting the peer group companies, consideration was given to revenue, market capitalization, enterprise value and number of employees of each company, while being sensitive to the positioning of the Company in relation to the peer group medians. The goal was to have the Company fit within the middle of the peer group (i.e., between the 25^th and the 75^th percentile) with respect to these metrics if possible. At the time the group was selected, the Company was near the median of this peer group in terms of revenue and enterprise value. Our Compensation Committee believes that the Company’s peer group continues to align the Company with the competitive market for talent for our key executives.

Base Salary

Base salary, as its name implies, is the basic compensatory element of the employment relationship, designed to compensate the executive for his or her day-to-day performance of duties. The amount of base salary distinguishes individuals’ level and responsibility within the organization and may also be impacted by the individual’s tenure in his or her current role. Exceptional performance and contribution to the growth and greater success of the organization are rewarded through other compensation elements, and for this reason, the benchmark target for base salary for each of our executive officers is set at a market-competitive level relative to our peer group as identified above when considering each executive’s role and responsibilities, as well as individual performance.

Effective January 1, 2021, Mr. Smith transitioned from the role of Chief Executive Officer into the role of Executive Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors, and Mr. Hingtgen transitioned from the role of President and Chief Operating Officer into the role of Chief Executive Officer. In anticipation of these new roles, in December 2020, the Compensation Committee reviewed the base salaries of Mr. Smith and Mr. Hingtgen and approved revisions to their base salaries, effective January 1, 2021, commensurate with their new roles and responsibilities. The base salaries of our other named executive officers were reviewed by the Compensation Committee in early 2021 as part of its annual compensation review. The Compensation Committee approved an increase in Mr. Hammons’ base salary for 2021 as a result of his promotion to President and Chief Financial Officer (from Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer) in February 2021 and the corresponding changes in his role and responsibilities. Salary increases for our other named executive officers were generally consistent with percentage increases among the broader market.

46

The base salaries approved for each of our named executive officers for 2021 and 2020 are set forth in the following table.

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation (EPIP)

Annual cash incentive compensation awards to the named executive officers were made in 2021 pursuant to the Company’s 2019 Employee Performance Incentive Plan (“EPIP”). Annual cash incentive compensation awards are intended to align employees’ interests with the goals and strategic initiatives established by the Company and to reward employees for their contributions during the period to which the incentive award relates. Targets for the annual cash incentive compensation awards are typically expressed as a percentage of the individual’s base salary.

Annual cash incentive compensation awards are “at risk” as they are subject to the attainment of specific goals. For 2021, each individual’s target plan continued to include multiple budgeted financial goals, and for each goal, varying award amounts could be earned depending on the level at which that goal was attained, (i.e., an underachievement and overachievement opportunity). For each named executive officer, the financial goals for 2021 were similar to those used in 2020.

The annual cash incentive compensation awards also continued to include non-financial strategic and operational performance improvement goals, which are intended to reward our named executive officers for progress on the Company’s key strategic priorities, including executing on the Company’s previously identified strategic imperatives (as referenced in greater detail below) and margin improvement initiatives. In addition, for 2021, as noted above, the following non-financial performance objectives were added: (i) providing support to the Company’s affiliated hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic while also focusing on recovering volume decreases that occurred during the pandemic, and (ii) continuing to execute on improvements in the Company’s capital structure and extension of its long-term debt.

As in prior years, the Company’s financial goals were based on the attainment of key financial objectives, including, where applicable, budgeted operating performance within the range of the Company’s annual guidance to investors reflected in the Company’s earnings release issued in February 2021 (the “2021 Performance Objectives”). The Compensation Committee reviews and

47

approves financial performance targets under our EPIP annually. The process begins with our rigorous internal budgeting process, which is undertaken each year and approved by our Board. Significant effort is invested to ensure that the metrics and targets in our annual cash incentive program reflect both a focus on continuous improvement and a realistic assessment of any changes in the market environment or within the Company. At the time the target levels were set in early 2021, the Compensation Committee believed that such target levels were appropriately challenging taking into account the uncertain economic and public health environment at such time and that achieving such target levels was possible only with significant effort from the named executive officers. The likelihood of the named executive officers achieving their respective target levels under our EPIP was not known at the time these target levels were set, and historically, in any given year, not all of the target levels have been achieved. The Compensation Committee determined that it was appropriate to set rigorous financial targets used to determine the cash incentive compensation awards in order to motivate the named executive officers to meet the Company’s business goals and to align named executive officers’ interests with the goals and strategic initiatives established by the Company.

The Company’s 2021 financial performance objectives under our EPIP for our named executive officers were as set forth in the tables below. Each goal target was scaled to achieve a partial award for less than targeted performance or above target award for overachievement as illustrated below:

Linear interpolation is used for performance between the points shown in the tables.

48

The annual cash incentive compensation awards also continued to include non-financial strategic and operational performance improvement goals, which are intended to reward our named executive officers for progress on the Company’s key strategic priorities, including executing on the Company’s previously identified strategic imperatives (as referenced in greater detail below) and margin improvement initiatives. In addition, for 2021, as noted above, the following non-financial performance objectives were added for each of our named executive officers: (i) providing support to the Company’s affiliated hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic while also focusing on recovering volume decreases that occurred during the pandemic, and (ii) continuing to execute on improvements in the Company’s capital structure and extension of its long-term debt.

In addition, the President of Clinical Services and Chief Medical Officer’s and the Executive Vice President and General Counsel’s annual incentive compensation awards included goals related to their specific functional area that are key to the Company’s overall success. For example, the President of Clinical Services and Chief Medical Officer’s annual incentive compensation opportunity was based in part on improving physician practice service margin, improving supply expenses, quality indicators and patient safety. In addition, the Executive Vice President and General Counsel’s annual incentive compensation opportunity included a component for successful progress toward resolving government investigations and stockholder litigation as well as managing department expenses.

The Company’s performance in 2021 resulted in each of our named executive officers receiving levels of cash incentive compensation in excess of their target levels. For example, our Chief Executive Officer earned 130% of his target cash incentive award attainable for 2021 (compared to our then-serving Chief Executive Officer who earned 128% of his target cash incentive award in 2020). For each component of the annual cash incentive compensation, the targeted award and attained award, expressed as a percentage of base salary, for each named executive officer along with the maximum incentive award attainable, including non-financial strategic and operational performance improvements and overachievement of Company goals, are set forth in the following tables:

49

Long-Term Incentives (LTI)

Long-term incentives continue to comprise a very important part of the Company’s executive compensation program. Equity awards are designed to reward the executives for their longer-term contributions to the success and growth of the Company and are directly linked to maximizing stockholder value. They also serve as a key retention tool.

Equity-based incentive awards are made pursuant to the Company’s 2009 Stock Option and Award Plan, as most recently amended and restated in March 2021 and approved by our stockholders in May 2021 (the “2009 Plan”). This plan provides for a wide variety of stock-based compensation awards, including incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance awards and other share-based awards. The Company has historically made awards only in the form of non-qualified stock options and both time-based and performance-based restricted stock, as these types of awards are most consistently used by the Company’s peer group and are thus deemed to provide the most competitive compensation element for LTI compensation.

Our named executive officers are granted 50% of their target annual LTI awards in the form of performance-based restricted stock with three-year cumulative performance targets. The Company believes that this reflects current governance best practices and helps to ensure that our executive management team is focused on maximizing the Company’s long-term performance.

2021 Equity-Based Incentive Awards

For 2021, consistent with recent years, our named executive officers received 50% of their target annual LTI awards in the form of performance-based restricted stock with three-year cumulative performance targets. The other 50% of the target annual LTI awards granted to each named executive officer in 2021 was allocated evenly between non-qualified stock options and time-based restricted stock, both of which vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date (March 1, 2021). The closing price of the Company’s stock on the grant date for these awards was $8.81 per share:

50

As previously discussed, the Compensation Committee generally utilizes a share-denominated approach to LTI grants. For 2021, Mr. Hingtgen received an annual LTI grant with the shares subject to these awards representing 11% fewer shares than the shares subject to the LTI awards granted to Mr. Smith for 2020 when he was serving as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. The target value of Mr. Hingtgen’s LTI award for 2021 was below the 25^th percentile for our peer group. Similarly, the aggregate number of shares for Mr. Smith’s 2021 LTI award was reduced by 20% relative to the shares subject to the LTI award granted to him in 2020 when he was serving as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. The value of the Company’s aggregate target LTI awards to its named executive officers remained at or below the median of our peer group in 2021.

As set forth above, 75% of the annual LTI award granted to each of our named executive officers in 2021 was in the form of performance-based restricted stock or non-qualified stock options, which will result in value to the named executive officer only to the extent the Company achieves its long-term performance goals and/or the Company’s stock price increases in the future. The Company believes that the LTI program properly aligns our executives’ interests with those of stockholders and helps to ensure that our executive management team is focused on maximizing the Company’s long-term performance while continuing to assist in attracting and retaining valuable executive talent.

For 2021, the three-year financial performance targets for the performance-based restricted stock awards granted to all named executive officers included Cumulative Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Growth and Cumulative Same-Store Net Revenue Growth performance metrics. These were the same three-year financial performance targets used in the 2020 LTI awards. The Compensation Committee believes these metrics emphasize financial growth and align the interest of our named executive officers with the Company’s long-term business strategy. In addition, for the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Executive Chairman, TSR Percentile Rank is included as an additional three-year financial performance target. The Compensation Committee believes that focusing on the long-term performance of the Company’s stock and tying such metric to our Chief Executive Officer’s, Chief Financial Officer’s and Executive Chairman’s long-term incentive compensation aligns the interests of our most senior executives with the interests of our stockholders as the Company executes on its long-range strategic plan.

51

The 2021 LTI awards to our named executive officers are further illustrated in the following table:

52

The following table illustrates the potential vesting on the third anniversary of the grant date of the portion of the 2021 performance-based restricted stock awards allocated to each performance objective based on various levels of achievement of that performance objective:

  Linear interpolation is used for performance between the points shown in the tables.

For purposes of determining the level of achievement for each portion of the performance-based awards, the determination of the level of achievement for Cumulative Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Growth, Cumulative Same-Store Net Revenue Growth and TSR Percentile Rank (for Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Chairman only), as applicable, during the Performance Period, will be determined independently from each other and will not impact the determination of the level of achievement for the other portions of the award.

To the extent that the performance objectives are attained, the restrictions will lapse on the portion of the award subject to that performance objective on the third anniversary of the grant date, provided that the grantee continues to be employed on such date, subject to certain exceptions. To the extent that the minimum performance objective achievement (80% for Cumulative Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Growth and Cumulative Same-Store Net Revenue Growth; 25^th percentile for TSR Percentile Rank (for Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Chairman only)) is not attained, the portion of the award subject to that performance objective will be forfeited in its entirety.

The following definitions will be used in determining achievement of the three-year performance targets for all performance-based restricted stock awards granted in 2021:

“Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA” for any fiscal year means Adjusted EBITDA as defined in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

“Cumulative Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Growth” over the Performance Period means the sum of each individual year’s Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Growth, which is a fraction, the numerator of which is the excess of (A) the Company’s Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA at the end of the year less (B) the Company’s Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA for the prior period, and the denominator of which is the Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA for the prior period. To the extent that the Cumulative Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Growth exceeds or falls short of the Cumulative Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Growth target, the amount of over achievement or underachievement will be determined based on the sum of the three-years Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA results divided by the sum of the three-year Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA targets.

“Performance Period” means the three-year performance period beginning January 1, 2021 and ending December 31, 2023.

“Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Target” means the Cumulative Three-Year Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Growth Target, as approved by the Compensation Committee.

53

“Same-Store Net Revenue” for any fiscal year means Net Revenue as defined in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, related to those hospitals to the extent the Company operated them in both comparable periods, excluding those hospitals that have been previously classified as discontinued operations for accounting purposes. In addition, it excludes Net Revenue from hospitals divested during the year of measurement, as well as, the comparable prior year. Same-Store Net Revenue should further be adjusted to exclude the effect of adverse or delayed federal, state or local governmental or regulatory action with regard to the Affordable Care Act, and other items as determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

“Cumulative Same-Store Net Revenue Growth” over the Performance Period means the sum of each individual year’s Same-Store Net Revenue growth, which is a fraction, the numerator of which is the excess of (A) the Company’s Same-Store Net Revenue at the end of the year less (B) the Company’s Same-Store Net Revenue for the prior year, and the denominator of which is the Same-Store Net Revenue for the prior year. To the extent that the Cumulative Same-Store Net Revenue Growth exceeds or falls short of the Cumulative Same-Store Net Revenue Growth target, the amount of over achievement or underachievement will be determined based on the sum of the three-year Same-Store Net Revenue results divided by the sum of the three-year Same-Store Net Revenue Growth targets.

“Same-Store Net Revenue Target” means the Cumulative Three-Year Same-Store Net Revenue Growth Target, as approved by the Compensation Committee.

In addition, the following definitions will be used in determining achievement of the three-year TSR Percentile Rank performance target for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Chairman, only:

“TSR” means total shareholder return as determined by dividing (i) the sum of (A) the Ending Period Average Price minus the Beginning Period Average Price plus (B) all dividends and other distributions paid on the issuer’s shares during the Performance Period by (ii) the Beginning Period Average Price. In calculating TSR, all dividends are assumed to have been reinvested in shares on the ex-dividend date.

“Beginning Period Average Price” means the average official closing price per share of the issuer over the 20-consecutive-trading days ending with and including the first day of the Performance Period (if the applicable day is not a trading day, the immediately preceding trading day).

“Ending Period Average Price” means the average official closing price per share of the issuer over the 20-consecutive-trading days ending with and including the last day of the Performance Period (if the applicable day is not a trading day, the immediately preceding trading day).

“TSR Percentile Rank” means the Company’s percentile ranking relative to the members of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index, excluding payors and distribution companies, at the end of the Performance Period based on TSR. TSR Percentile Rank is determined by ordering the relevant S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index companies, excluding payors and distribution companies, (plus the Company if the Company is not one of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index companies) from highest to lowest based on TSR for the Performance Period and assigning a TSR Percentile Rank to each company, with the TSR Percentile Rank for the company with the highest TSR at 100%, the TSR Percentile Rank for the company with the lowest TSR at 0% and the TSR Percentile Rank for the remaining companies determined based on straight line interpolation.

54

2019-2021 Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards

In March 2019, each of our named-executive officers received performance-based restricted stock awards tied to achieving Cumulative Same-Store Adjusted EBITDA Growth (with a target of 9.0% cumulative same-store growth) and Cumulative Same-Store Net Revenue Growth (with a target of 6.0% cumulative same-store growth) during the three-year performance period from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2021 (the “2019-2021 Performance Period”). The grant date fair value of these awards was $4.99 per share. For the then-serving Chief Executive Officer (now the Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors) and the then-serving Chief Financial Officer (who is no longer employed by the Company), a portion of their performance-based restricted stock award was also tied to the Company’s TSR Percentile Rank (with a target of the 50^th percentile). For the then-serving Chief Executive Officer and the then-serving Chief Financial Officer, 40% of their performance-based restricted stock award was tied to the achievement of the Cumulative Same-Store Adjusted EBITDA Growth target, 40% was tied to the achievement of the Cumulative Same-Store Net Revenue Growth target, and 20% was tied to achievement of the TSR Percentile Rank target. For our other current named executive officers, 50% of their performance-based restricted stock award was tied to the achievement of the Cumulative Same-Store Adjusted EBITDA Growth target, and 50% was tied to the achievement of the Cumulative Same-Store Net Revenue Growth target. The Compensation Committee believed these metrics emphasized financial growth and aligned the interest of our named executive officers with the Company’s long-term business strategy. Each performance target was scaled to achieve a partial award for less than targeted performance or above target award for exceptional performance as illustrated below:

  Linear interpolation is used for performance between the points shown in the tables.

55

Based on the Company’s three-year cumulative financial results from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2021, the Company achieved Cumulative Same-Store EBITDA Growth of 27.6% and Cumulative Same-Store Net Revenue Growth of 13.3%. In addition, the Company’s three-year TSR Percentile Rank was at the 80^th percentile. Because the Company’s performance was at least 120% of the target for Cumulative Same-Store Adjusted EBITDA Growth and for Cumulative Same-Store Net Revenue Growth, and the Company’s TSR Percentile Rank was at least at the 75^th percentile, the 2019 performance-based restricted stock awards to our named executive officers vested at 200% of the number of shares originally granted to each award recipient in 2019 as shown in the table below: